government of india 7 floor, a wing,
TRANSCRIPT
Government of India
Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Office of Development Commissioner (MSME),
7th
Floor, A Wing,
Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road,
New Delhi-110108
Agenda
for
51st Meeting of Steering Committee
of
Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme
(MSE-CDP)
Date &Time : 12.09.2019 at 4:30 PM
Venue : New Delhi
Agenda
Points
Description Page No.
51.1 Confirmation of Minutes 1
51.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2
51.3 Proposals for In-Principle Approval
Andhra Pradesh
51.3.1 Up-gradation of Industrial Park (Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam,
Krishna District
3
51.3.2 Up-gradation of Growth Centre at Hindupur, Anantapuramu District 7
51.3.3 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Autonagar, Phase-IV, Guntur
District
11
Gujarat
51.3.4 CFC in Textile Cluster, Dahod 15
51.3.5 CFC in Gold Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar 20
51.3.6 CFC in Textile Cluster, Ahmedabad 25
51.3.7 CFC in Hazardous Waste Incincration Facility Cluster, Ahmadabad 30
51.3.8 CFC in Ferrous Scrap Processing Cluster, Bhavnagar 35
Himachal Pradesh
51.3.9 CFC in General Engineering Cluster, Una 40
51.3.10 Up-gradation of Infrastructure Development at Parwanoo Industrial
Area
48
Kerala
51.3.11 CFC in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam 52
Maharashtra
51.3.12 CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Armori 59
Odisha
51.3.13 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Jagatpur, Cuttack 65
Punjab
51.3.14 CFC in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana 68
Rajasthan
51.3.15 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at IGC, Parbatsar, Nagour 75
51.3.16 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Peepalawa, Banswara 78
51.3.17 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Jaisalmer 81
51.3.18 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at MTC, Ajmer 84
51.3.19 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Makrana, Nagaur 87
Tamil Nadu
51.3.20 CFC in Sweater Cluster, Coonoor, Nilgiris 90
Telangana
51.3.21 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri
District
96
51.3.22 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Autonagar, Rangga Reddy District 100
51.3.23 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District 104
51.3.24 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District 108
Agenda
Points
Description Page No.
51.3.25 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Warangal (Urban) District 112
51.3.26 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam
District
116
51.3.27 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally
Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District
120
51.4 Proposals for Final Approval
Jharkhand
51.4.1 Setting up of Industrial Estate at Gopalganj Village, P.O. Nirsa,
District Dhanbad
124
51.4.2 Setting up of Industrial Estate at Barhe Village, Chahno Block,
Bijupara, Ranchi
129
Rajasthan
51.4.3 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Sirohi Road, Sirohi 133
Punjab
51.4.4 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Focal Point, Amritsar 137
51.4.5 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib,
District Tarn Taran
142
51.4.6 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Focal Point, Pathankot 147
51.4.7 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Chanalon, District SAS Nagar 152
51.4.8 Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point, Kotkapura, District Faridkot 157
51.4.9 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Focal Point, Hoshiarpur 162
51.4.10 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Focal Point, Nawanshahr 167
Tamil Nadu
51.4.11 CFC in Apparel Cluster, Tirupur 172
51.5 Ratification of Decisions
Haryana
51.5.1 CFC in Footwear Cluster, Bahdurgarh - for replacement of machinery 180
Karnataka
51.5.2 Time extension to CFC in Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara
Kannada
181
Maharashtra
51.5.3 Time extension to CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Ramtek, Nagpur 182
Odisha
51.5.4 Time extension to CFC in Pharmaceutical Cluster, Cuttack 183
Punjab
51.5.5 Final approval of up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Focal Point,
Batala, District Gurdaspur
184
Telangana
51.5.6 New Industrial Estate at Ravalkole, Malkajgiri District 185
51.5.7 Time extension for new Industrial Estate at Automotive &
Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District
188
51.5.8 Approval of old funding pattern of GoI grant in respect of setting up
of CFC in Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali, Punjab.
190
51.6 Any Other Points
*****
1
Item No. 51.1. : Confirmation of Minutes of 50th
Meeting of Steering Committee held
on 02.07.2019.
Minutes of 50th
Meeting of Steering Committee held on 02.07.19 were uploaded on the website
and communicated to stakeholders on 18.07.19. Minutes are annexed at Annexure-I. Since no
comments have been received from any of the members, minutes may kindly be confirmed.
******
2
Item No. 51.2 : Action Taken Report on the action points of 50th
Meeting of Steering
Committee
Item No. Item Description Decision Taken Action Taken
50.3.1 to
50.3.23
In-principle approval for various
proposals.
In-principle approval
accorded
Communicated
to all
concerned
50.4.1 to
50.4.35
Final approval for various proposals. Final approval accorded
50.5.1 to
50.5.12
Ratification of decisions taken on
file.
Ratified the decision of
time extension.
50.6 Any Other Points
50.6.1 Dropping of proposal of setting up
of new ID Centre at Ibrahimpatnam,
Rangareddy District, Telangana
Based on the request of
State Government,
Steering Committee
agreed to drop the
proposal.
*******
3
Agenda No. 51.3.1: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
(Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.
Background
(i) Proposal was received from Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
(APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada vide application ref. No. 14037 dated 19.02.19 &
recommended by MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(ii) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Andhra
Pradesh in its meeting held on 26.02.19.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 07.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Krishna Industrial Estate : Jewellery Park Machilipatnam (Up-gradation).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 89.83 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 46.48 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 258
Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 256 0.26 - 0.5 1 1.01 – 3.0 1 Total No. of Plots 258
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic
--
4
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Jewellery Park is well connected by road, rail, sea and airport with nearest NH – 216 located at 1.5 km North west of the site; the nearest railway station is at Machilipatnam (~ 5 km). The proposed Machilipatnam port is located at about ~ 5 km from the Jewellery Park. Power supply: A 33/11 KV substation is located within the Jewellery Park. Water Supply: Water is being sourced from Municipal water supply connection and also bore wells, water is being supplied through tankers drawing water from summer storage tank.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure facilities.
English version of registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The JP Machilipatnam is expected to generate direct and indirect. The total direct employment is estimated to be about 450. The indirect employment is expected to be about 900. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 1350. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for the local people.
Required in format.
Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in the JP, Machilipatnam will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and setting up of new units in the already allotted
--
5
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks vacant lands. Based on the existing profile of JP, Machilipatnam and discussions with the members of JP, Machilipatnam (representatives of Industrial units), an attempt has been made to quantify the expected benefits of the JP.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 93.40
(ii) Cost of laying roads (internal roads – CC) 165.75
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 106.83
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 63.65
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
105.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 564.63
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 35.00
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 154.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 23.81
Total 817.44
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 78.39 640.78 (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 21.61 176.66
Total 100.00 817.44
6
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) English version of registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(viii) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
(Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.
*****
7
Agenda No. 51.3.2: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Growth Centre at
Hindupur, Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh.
Background
(i) Proposal was received from Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
(APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada vide application ref. No. 14017 dated 18.02.19 &
recommended by MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(ii) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Andhra
Pradesh in its meeting held on 26.02.19.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 07.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Ananthapur Industrial Estate : Growth Centre Hindupur (Up-gradation ).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 391.21 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 391.21 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 279
Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 138 0.26 - 0.5 73 0.51 - 1.0 37 1.01 - 5.0 23 5.0 and above 8 Total No. of Plots 279
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial
--
8
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Growth Centre, Hindupur (HGC) is well connected by road network. Site abuts SH 9 that connects Hindupur and Gauribindanur (Karnataka). NH 44 is at a distance of 40 km east of project site. South central railway line connecting Hindupur and Bangalore cuts across the HGC in north south direction. Nearest railway station is Devarapalli located abutting HGC. Nearest airport to HGC is Kempegowda International Airport at Bangalore located at about 100 km south. Nearest domestic airport is located at Kadapa at about 200 km east of site.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure facilities.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes --
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
GC Hindupur is expected to generate both direct and indirect employment. The total direct employment is estimated to be is about 300. The indirect employment expected to be created by the HGC would be about 600. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 900. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both direct & in direct) for the local people.
Required in format.
Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in Growth Center, Hindupur will facilitate improved functioning of existing units and would attract new units in the allotted vacant land.
--
9
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 81.19
(ii) Cost of laying roads (roads – CC) 239.28
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 111.08
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 74.78
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
246.53
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 782.86
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 154.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.11
Total 964.97
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by
IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 74.30 716.98
(ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 25.70 247.99
Total 100.00 964.97
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
10
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(viii) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Growth Centre
at Hindupur, Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh.
*****
11
Agenda No. 51.3.3: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
(Autonagar), Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
Background
(i) Proposal was received from Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
(APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada vide application ref. No. 14033 dated 19.02.19 &
recommended by MSME-DI, Hyderabad
(ii) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Andhra
Pradesh in its meeting held on 26.02.19.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 07.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Guntur. Industrial Estate : Autonagar, Guntur (Up-gradation)
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan Yes. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 131.45 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 92.36 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 1424
Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 1424 Total No. of Plots 1424
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada.
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
12
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Connectivity: The Autonagar, Guntur (Phase – IV) Industrial Park is well connected by road, rail, sea and airport with NH – 16 abutting the IP on northern side of the site; NH-71 abuts the project site on the Eastern side, the nearest airport is Gannavaram Airport ~ 50 km from project site. The nearest railway station is at Guntur (~ 3 km). Power supply: A 33/11 KV substation is located within the Industrial Park. Water supply: Water is being sourced from borewells connection and to OHT, water is being supplied through tankers drawing water from OHT and individual borewells of units.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure facilities.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes --
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The Auto Nagar Guntur is expected to generate direct and indirect. The total direct employment is estimated to be about 500. The indirect employment is expected to be about 1000. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 1500. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for the local people.
Required in format.
Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in the AN, Guntur will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and Expansion of units in the already allotted plots. Based on the existing profile of Autonagar (AN), Guntur and discussions with the members of AN, Guntur (representatives of Industrial units), an attempt has been made to quantify the expected benefits of the AN.
--
13
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 96.61
(ii) Cost of laying roads (roads – CC) 225.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 127.16
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 83.25
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
236.96
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 798.98
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 150.50
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.48
Total 977.96
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 73.50 718.85
(ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 26.50 259.11
Total 100.00 977.96
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
14
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(viii) APIICd, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
(Autonagar), Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
*****
15
Agenda No. 51.3.4: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Textile Cluster, Dahod, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) held
on 05.07.19.
Focus Report for the proposal received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide email dated
02.08.19.
Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide online ref. No. 14358 dated
06.08.19.
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meetings held on 09.08.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Textile Cluster
District : Dahod
Location of Cluster : Sahkar Nagar
Lok Sabha Constituency : Dahod (ST)
Main Product : Fabric Cutting and Designing
No. of Enterprises including
break up (Micro, Small,
Medium) :
Micro : 60 Small : 0 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore)
2013-14 : 8.50
2014-15 : 9.45
2015-16 : 10.50
2016-17 : 11.66
2017-18 : 12.96
Exports for the last five years Nil
Employment in Cluster : Total 540 Nos. (Direct: 240 Nos. Indirect: 300 Nos.)
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology
thus upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a
common facility centre
Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Advanced Technology Lower Productivity in various segments. No R&D Facilities
Other Information : NA
16
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance
Technology and R&D Facilities to
improve the final product.
--
(b.) Location of CFC 1147, Vidhya dham Socity, Sahkar Nagar, Dahod
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
30 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered lease of land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Sarthak Charitable Trust
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
33 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 1500 Sq mtr --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Leaser Fabric Cutting Machine Automatic Fabrics Designing
Machine
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before CFC
After CFC
No. of Units 60 150 Prod. (Mtr) 1,080,000 4,050,000 Turnover (Rs. in cr)
12.96 44.55
Employment (Nos)
240 900
Profit (Rs. in cr)
1.50 6.75
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Exempted for NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
Undertaking in regard to exemption is required from GPCB .
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- --
3. Information about SPV
17
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Sarthak Charitable Trust 1147, Vidhya dham Socity, Sahkar nagar, Dahod
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Trust Required
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
-- --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 10.02.16 --
(e.) Number of Members 40 Nos --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Provided --
(h.) Paid up capital Provided --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account No: 208210110023907 (Bank of India)
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
-- --
(b) Water 75000 LTR per year --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
18
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Month 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 05.07.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 35.06 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 18.65% Pay Back Period comes at 4.54 Years
--
(c.) DSCR -- --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26.30% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% comes Rs. 111.00 Lakhs. --
(f.) DER -- --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Only one CFC operational in State and one accord Final Approval during 50
th
SCM held on 02.07.19
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
Sr. No Particulars Amount
1 Land and Building -
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc.
247.80
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 29.00
4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 5.80
5 Margin money for Working Capital 10.00
Total 292.60
19
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 234.08
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 10.00 29.26
3 SPV contribution 10.00 29.26
Total 100.00 292.60
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of
GST GST
Total Cost
1 Automatic Fabric Laser Cutting Machine
1 85.00 18% 15.30 100.30
2 Automatic Fabrics Designing Machine
1 115.00 18% 20.70 135.70
Total 236.00
Contingencies @ 5% 11.80
Total Cost of Equipments 247.80
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of
installed capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Details of SPV and MoA and AoA.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Textile Cluster, Dahod, Gujarat.
*********
20
Agenda No. 51.3.5: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) held
on 05.07.19.
Focus Report for the proposal received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide email dated
02.08.19.
Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide online ref. No. 14378 dated
06.08.19.
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meetings held on 09.08.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Jewellery Cluster
District : Jamnagar
Location of Cluster : Hathi street
Lok Sabha Constituency : Jamnagar
Main Product : Ornaments
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro :125 Small : 0 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 44.30 2014-15 : 49.20 2015-16 : 54.60 2016-17 : 60.75 2017-18 : 67.50
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : Total: 1425 Nos. (Direct: 625 Nos. and Indirect: 800 Nos.)
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are having no testing facilities, units are using conventional technology, which are affecting quality of the products.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : No Testing Facility Non availability of Advanced Technology No Quality Lab
Other Information : NA
21
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology Testing Lab, Quality Lab to improve the final product.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Styanaran Temple Road, Hathi Streeet, Dis- Jamnagar 361001
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
70 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
30 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered lease of land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Shri Ghanshyam Gold Jewellery Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
31 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 5000 Sq ft --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Turning, Casting and Designing Facility for Bangle Ring etc.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before Intervention
After Intervention
No. of Units 125 240 Production (K.G.)
5,625 17,640
Turnover (Rs. in Cr)
67.50 176.40
Employment (Nos.)
625 1680
Profit (Rs. In Cr)
4.38 13.20
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Exempted for NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
Undertaking in regard to exemption is required from GPCB .
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- --
22
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Shri Ghanshyam Gold Jewellery Foundation, Address- Styanaran Temple Road, Hathi Street, District- Jamnagar 361001
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company Required
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
-- Required
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 25.06.19 --
(e.) Number of Members 100 Nos --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Yes, Please Refer SPV MOA - Annexure: B SPV Rules and Regulation Annexure: B
Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Provided --
(h.) Paid up capital Provided --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c -- --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized. --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII, Gandhinagar.
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
-- --
(b) Water 5000 ltr/ year --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Month 24 months from date
23
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 05.07.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 37.11 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 17.69% Pay Back Period comes at 4.78 Years
--
(c.) DSCR -- --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.25 % --
(e.) NPV @ 10% NPV @ 10% comes Rs. Rs.313.78 lakh. --
(f.) DER -- --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Only one CFC operational in State and one
accord Final Approval during 50th
SCM held
on 02.07.19
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
Sr. No Particulars Amount 1 Land and Building -
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc.
844.29
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 31.50 4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 18.00 5 Margin money for Working Capital 20.00
Total 913.79
24
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 731.03
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 10.00 91.38
3 SPV contribution 10.00 91.38
Total 100.00 913.79
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of GST
GST Total Cost
1 Bangle Ring and Bead Designing Plant 1 351.70 18% 63.31 415.01
2 Casting Plant
1 329.73 18% 59.35 389.08
Total 804.09
Contingencies @ 5% 40.20
Total Cost of Equipments 844.29
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Details of SPV and MoA and AoA.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar, Gujarat.
*********
25
Agenda No. 51.3.6: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Textile Cluster, Narol, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) held
on 05.07.19.
Focus Report for the proposal received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide email dated
02.08.19.
Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide online ref. No. 14377 dated
06.08.19.
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meetings held on 09.08.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Textile Cluster
District : Ahmedabad
Location of Cluster : Narol
Lok Sabha Constituency : Ahmedabad East
Main Product : Readymade Garments product like Shirt, Jeans, T-shirt etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro : 85 Small : 0 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 15.65 2014-15 : 17.40 2015-16 : 19.35 2016-17 : 21.51 2017-18 : 23.91
Exports for the last five years Nil
Employment in Cluster : Total: 1000 Nos. (Direct: 350 Nos. and Indirect: 650 Nos.)
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology, advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Advanced Technology Lack of skilled labour Lack of Quality Lab
Other Information : --
26
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology, R& D Facility and Quality Lab to improve the final product.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Block-A, F.F. 109 Survey No-293,Krishna, Complex, Shahwadi Bus Stop, Narol Road, Ahmedabad
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
65 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
35 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered lease of land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Sonipra Textile Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
33 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
1000 Sq. Yard --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed 100 Layer Fabric Cutting Machine Laser Fabrics Designing Machine
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before Intervention
After Intervention
No. of Units 85 175 Production (Mtr)
1912500 6300000
Turnover (Rs. in Crore)
23.91 69.30
Employment (in No)
340 1050
Profit (Rs. in Crore)
2.55 7.88
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Exempted for NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
Undertaking in regard to exemption is required from GPCB .
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- --
27
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Name : Sonipra Textile Foundation Address-Block-A, F.F. 109 Survey No-293,Krishna, Complex, Shahwadi Bus Stop, Narol Road, Ahmedabad
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
-- Required
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
-- --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
30.04.19 --
(e.) Number of Members 50 Nos --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital -- --
(h.) Paid up capital -- --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Account. No: 10190004139653, Bandhan Bank, Ashram Road
Bank account open in national bank is
required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII Gandhinagar
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
-- --
(b) Water 75000 LTR/year --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --
28
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months --
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 05.07.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
As per Financial Statement --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 35.24 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 19.06% Pay Back Period comes at 4.48 Years
--
(c.) DSCR -- --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26.78% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% comes Rs. 158.89 Lakhs. --
(f.) DER -- --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Only one CFC operational in State and one accord Final Approval during 50
th SCM held
on 02.07.19
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
Sr. No Particulars Amount 1 Land and Building -
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc.
353.12
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 25.00 4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 7.80
5 Margin money for Working Capital 12.00
Total 397.92
29
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 318.34
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 10.00 39.79
3 SPV contribution 10.00 39.79
Total 100.00 397.92
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
S.No. Name of Machinery Qty. Unit Basic Price
Rate of GST
GST Total Cost
1 100 Layer Fabric Cutting Machine 2 85.00 18% 15.30 200.60
2 Laser Fabrics Designing Machine 1 115.00 18% 20.70 135.70
Total 336.30
Contingencies @ 5% 16.82
Total Cost of Equipments 353.12
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Bank account open in Nationalized Bank is required
(xi) Details of SPV and MOA and AOA.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Textile Cluster, Narol, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
*********
30
Agenda No. 51.3.7: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Hazardous Waste Incineration Facility Cluster,
Ahmadabad, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) held
on 05.07.19.
Focus Report for the proposal received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide email dated
02.08.19.
Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide online ref. No. 14384 dated
06.08.19.
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meetings held on 09.08.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Hazardous Waste Incincration Facility Cluster
District : Ahmedabad
Location of Cluster : Balva
Lok Sabha Constituency : Ahmedabad West(SC)
Main Product : Waste decontamination, Recycle
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro :55 Small : 35 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2013-14 37.60
2014-15 44.20
2015-16 52.00
2016-17 61.20
2017-18 72.00
Exports for the last five years Nil
Employment in Cluster : Total: 1900 Nos. (Direct: 900 Nos. and Indirect: 1000 Nos.)
Technology Details : There is no Solid Hazard Waste Incinerator EPT Plant ( Zero Liquid Discharged Testing Equipments )
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre
Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Technology to treatment of waste before disposal.
Non availability of Technology for waste segregation at source.
Other Information : NA
31
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like waste decontamination and Recycling plant in the units. EPT Plant (Zero Liquid Discharged), testing unit with modern tools and technology.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Plot no: 213, Kerala GIDC, Taluka Bavla Dis. Ahmedabad
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
65 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
35 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered lease of land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Watair Envisol Waste Management Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
32 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 3500 Sq Yard --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Solid Hazarded Waste Incinerator EPT Plant ( Zero Liquid Discharged) Testing Equipments
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before Intervention
After Intervention
No. of Units 90 175 Employment 900 2,100 Turnover (Rs. in Cr)
72.00 175.00
Profit (Rs. In Cr)
5.40 14.00
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
-- NOC from State Pollution Control Board is required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- --
(l.) --
32
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Watair Envisol Waste Management Foundation Address;- Plot no: 213, Kerala GIDC, Taluka Bavla Dis. Ahmedabad
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company Required
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
- --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 25.06.2019 --
(e.) Number of Members 70 Nos. --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital -- --
(h.) Paid up capital -- Required
(i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c -- --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII, Gandhinagar
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
-- --
(b) Water 75,00,000 Ltr/ year --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development CED, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
33
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Guajarat on 05.07.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 39.80 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 17.70% Pay Back Period comes at 4.78 Years
--
(c.) DSCR -- --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.41% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% comes Rs. Rs. 217.42 Lakhs --
(f.) DER -- --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Only one CFC operational in State and one accord Final Approval during 50
th SCM held
on 02.07.19
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
Sr. No Particulars Amount
1 Land and Building -
2 Plant & Machinery including Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc. 569.94
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 33.00
4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 12.50
5 Margin money for Working Capital 15.00
Total 630.44
34
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 504.36
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 10.00 63.04
3 SPV contribution 10.00 63.04
Total 100.00 630.44
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Name of Machinery QTY Unit Basic Price
Rate of
GST GST
Total Cost
1 Solid Hazarded Waste Incinerator 1 350.00 18% 63.00 413.00
2 ETP Plant (Zero Liquid Discharged)
1 30.00 18% 5.40 35.40
3 Testing Equipment
1 80.00 18% 14.40 94.40
Total 542.80
Contingencies @ 5% 27.14
Total Cost of Equipments 569.94
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Details of SPV and MOA and AOA.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Hazardous Waste Incincration Facility Cluster, Ahmadabad, Gujarat.
*********
35
Agenda No. 51.3.8: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Ferrous Scrap Processing Cluster, Bhavnagar,
Bhavnagar, Gujarat.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) held
on 05.07.19.
Focus Report for the proposal received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide email dated
02.08.19.
Proposal was received from MSME-DI, Ahmedabad vide online ref. No. 14397 dated
06.08.19.
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meetings held on 09.08.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Ferrous Scrap Processing Cluster
District : Bhavnagar
Location of Cluster : Bhavnagar
Lok Sabha Constituency : Bhavnagar
Main Product : Ferrous Ingots making
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro :260 Small : 40 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2013-14 : 242.10 2014-15 : 269.00 2015-16 : 298.90 2016-17 : 332.10 2017-18 : 369.00
Exports for the last five years Nil
Employment in Cluster : Total: 5700 Nos. (Direct: 2700Nos. and Indirect: 3000 Nos.)
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology; advance and upgraded technology is required.
Whether DS Conducted : DSR has been conducted on January 2019
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Advanced Technology
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance Technology to improve the final product.
--
36
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(b.) Location of CFC Village Bhandariya, Bhavnagar alang Road, national highway 8, Bhavnagar.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
60 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
40 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered lease of land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of SDN Ferrous Scrap Processing Foundation
iii. Valuation and its basis
NA
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use No
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
32 Year
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
5000 Sq Meter --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
NA --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Electromagnetic Induction Furnace Testing Equipment
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before Intervention
After Intervention
No. of Units 300 650 Production (M.T.)
90,000 273,000
Turnover (Rs. In Cr)
369.00 1064.70
Employment 2,700 7,800
--
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
--. Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- --
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Name: SDN Ferrous Scrap Processing Foundation Address:307 EVA Complex , Opp. Gulista Ground, Bhavnagar- 364002
--
37
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(b.) Nature of SPV (company or Society or Trust)
Company Required
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Nil --
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
25.06.19 --
(e.) Number of Members 220 Nos --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
- --
(h.) Paid up capital - --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c -- Required
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
Awareness Camp Organized --
(m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India EDII
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- Required
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
-- --
(b) Water 250000 LTR / year --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
Na -- --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Centre for Entrepreneurship Development (CED), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
--
38
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR appraised by SLSC meeting held in Gandhi Nagar, Gujarat on 05.07.19 under chairmanship of Commissioner , MSME, Govt. of Gujarat
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP 37.09 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 15.73 % Pay Back Period comes at 5.15 Years
--
(c.) DSCR -- --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.35% --
(e.) NPV NPV @ 10% comes Rs. 505.46 Lakhs. --
(f.) DER -- --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- --
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Only one CFC operational in State and one accord Final Approval during 50
th SCM held on 02.07.19
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh)
S. No Particulars Amount 1 Land and Building 318.24
2 Plant & Machinery including ,Installation, Taxes/duties, Contingencies, etc. 1579.73
3 Misc. Fixed Assets 35.00 4 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 38.80
5 Margin money for Working Capital 25.00
Total 1996.77
39
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 67.61 1350.00
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 10.00 199.70
3 SPV contribution 22.39 447.07
Total 100.00 1996.77
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
SR.NO. Name of Machinery QTY
Unit
Basic
Price
Rate
of
GST
GST Total
Cost
1
Electromagnetic Induction Furnace
Plant ( 20 M.T. Capacity) with two
numbers Muffels and Accessories.
1 1275.00 18% 229.50 1504.50
Total 1504.50
Contingencies @ 5% 75.23
Total Cost of Equipments 1579.73
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be
(ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(x) Details of SPV and MOA and AOA.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Ferrous Scrap Processing Cluster, Bhavnagar, Bhavnagar, Gujarat.
*********
40
Agenda No. 51.3.9: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in General Engineering Cluster, Una, Himachal Pradesh.
Background:
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) in its
meeting held on 13.09.18 at Shimla.
(ii) Proposal was received from Government of Himachal Pradesh vide online ref. No.
13456 dated 06.10.18 & recommended by MSME-DI, Solan.
(iii) Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Solan vide letter dated 20.06.19.
(iv) Proposal was deliberated during 67th
meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee
(TEAC) held on 09.08.19 and recommended the proposal to place before the Steering
Committee for In-principle approval and advised MSME-DI, Solan to:
(i) Facilitate SPV members to include 3D Printing / Reverse Engineering
facilities in the list of machinery.
(ii) Provide details of all 300 units.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : General Engineering Cluster District Una Location of Cluster : Una Lok Sabha Constituency : Hamirpur Main Product : Manufacturing of Auto Components, Aviation Parts, Machinery
& Equipments, Fasteners, Forgings, Industrial Blades, Bearings, Hand Tools, Pipes, Steel Tubes, Welding Equipments, Fabrication products, Plastic & Rubber Products etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro 148 Small 122 Medium 30 Total 300
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2013-14 1575 2014-15 1650 2015-16 1825 2016-17 1900 2017-18 2000
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 7000 Nos. (Direct & Indirect) Technology Details : At present the Cluster members are using traditional
method. The engineering units of Tahliwal deploy conventional lathe machines rendering them incapable to manufacture high quality automotive products.
The finishing on the products is rather ordinary and often hinders the capacity of small firms to approach large OEMs. Moreover, there is no tool room with modern machines where cluster units can their tools or dyes made.
The outdated machineries that the cluster units deploy cannot match the quality and standard of modern age. These conventional machines are time and energy
41
consuming. Presently, cluster units are dependent on private players located far off like in Ludhiana and Jalandhar for getting the job work done.
The cluster units do not have the testing facility for raw material as well as finished products.
The NABL or equivalent testing lab is not available in the region. The lack of physical & chemical testing facilities hampers the growth of the cluster units. For any kind of tests, the entrepreneurs need to go to either Ludhiana, Chandigarh & Delhi, which is not only time consuming but also results in higher travel costs.
This is resulting in improper designing, time delays and higher costing. Some of the firms are also losing export market due to poor designing of the products. Thus, there is a need to establish a design development centre, which will also serves as training facility for skilled workers to learn Auto CAD.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : Obsolete level of technology.
Production inefficiencies due to manual operations as there is no tool room facility available in the district / area.
Substandard product quality hampering the market outreach.
Prevalent of job work from advanced units in Delhi, resulting higher costs.
No NABL Testing lab available. Main Problems of Cluster : Absence of Advanced Mini Tool Room.
Absence of NABL Testing Lab. Lack of Common Design Development & Training Centre. Lack of skilled workforce.
Other Information : --
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Justification for CFC Presently there is no tool room
available in the region housing modern machines for job work.
The Cluster units are mostly dependent on the private players located far off at places like Ludhiana, Delhi, Chennai for tooling job work. Moreover, the products are often sent faraway for obtaining better finishing on the products.
The private player's high prices for the job work and often refuse to accept low work volume from small players. These firm also require jigs & fixtures for job work which are presently outsourced.
In addition, there is an absence of repair & maintenance work machinery within the cluster which is badly required.
At present, no certified testing lab available in the region. Cluster units are totally dependent of private player sitting in gar flung place like Mohali,
--
42
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
Delhi, Mumabi and Faridabad for testing of their raw material as well final product. So, the NABL testing lab is the need of the hour.
Also the cluster units do not have the design and development facility. 80% of the cluster units are using the manual designing or hiring the services from outside consultants in computer aided designing. This is resulting in improper designing, time delay & higher costing.
The cluster badly needs a Rapid Prototype Machine to undertake new product development.
(b.) Location of CFC Village Bhatu Tehsil Haroli District Una Himachal Pradesh.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km
60
% age of units in radius of 10km
40
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired The land in the possession of Directorate
of Industries, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh and shall be provided on lease to SPV for a period of 30 years to set up the proposed CFC.
Registered land lease deed from Revenue Department of Government of HP for a period of 30 years or more is required.
ii. Title is in name of - iii. Valuation and its basis 133.43 Lakhs, basis prevalent
government industrial plot rates in Una. iv. Land is sufficient Yes. -- v. Change of land use No. -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Land on lease basis for 15 years.
30 years required.
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes.
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
82873.88 sq. ft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 557 per sq. ft. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Advanced Mini Tool Room with modern machines.
NABL Testing Lab. Common Design Development &
Training Centre.
--
g.) Prod capacity of CFC The CFC has been proposed for job work and will be operational on an eight (8) hours shift basis for 300 days in a year.
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Sl. No.
Parameter Before intervention
After Intervention
1. Nos. of cluster units
300 330
2 Cluster Turnover (Rs. in crore)
Appx. 2000 cr. Expected to increase Rs.100 crore in 1
st
year & subsequently will increase @ 10% per year.
43
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
3 Export (Rs. in crore)
Current exports from micro and small unit are negligible, only large units are exporting.
About 5 units shall start exporting within first two years of CFC operation.
4 Employment 7000 nos. 7500 nos.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Yes. NOC from PCB is required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC Total 44 person required for CFC -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Revenue will generated through user fee basis.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Name and Address Haroli Industrial Infrastructure
Development Society. Village - Bathu, Tehsil – Haroli, District – Una, Himachal Pradesh.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society registered under section 25 of H.P. Societies Act, 2006.
--
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
General Manager, DIC, Una and MSME DI official.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
26th
July 2017
--
(e.) Number of Members 21 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AOA submitted
Submitted. --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
NA
(h.) Paid up capital NA (i.) Shareholding Pattern None of the single units holds more than
10% contribution in the equity capital of the SPV.
Document required.
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Yes. --
(k.) SPV specific A/c HDFC Bank Branch, Una -- (l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
The SPV has conducted a series of stakeholder consultations (with various members, DIC, Una and EY experts) during finalization of project components, selection of technologies and development of DPR. The SPV has been instrumental in spreading awareness about the cluster development under MSE-CDP scheme in Una and has helped in validation of findings and recommendations. It has kept the state government and the DIC Una
--
44
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
engaged during the entire period of development of DSR and DPR.
(m.) Technical Institution Govt. ITI & Polytechnic Una, KC Engineering College, Indus University, NIT.
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
The SPV members form a major chunk of engineering units in district Una. The projections have been made on the basis of their requirement, though the proof of the same will be submitted before Steering Committee.
--
(o) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
267.85 KVA
--
(b) Water 500 lt, per for human consumption -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
Chemical, Lubricant, Grease, Machine Oil, Coolant etc.
--
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Implementing Agency Industrial Area Development Agency
(IADA), Tahliwal, Una District.
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
Industrial Area Development Agency (IADA), Tahliwal, District Una..
--
(c.) Implementation Period
24 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal.
Required prior to final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meeting of held on 09.08.19 recommended the proposal to place before the Steering Committee for In-principle approval and advised MSME-DI, Solan to: (i) Facilitate SPV members to include 3D Printing / Reverse
Engineering facilities in the list of machinery. (ii) Provide details of all 300 units.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank,if applicable arrangement made)
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by IA Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) BEP 58.55% As per MSE-CDP
guidelines. (b.) IRR, Payback period 17.12% & payback period 5.85
45
Description Proposed by IA Comments by Cluster Division
years. (c.) DSCR N/A (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
20.14% 25% is desirable.
(e.) NPV 539.14 As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(f.) DER N/A (g.) Sensitivity Analysis 58.55%, 63.06% & 68.33%. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Nil. --
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land its development 133.43 2. Building and other civil construction 277.96 3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1124.46 4. Misc. fixed assets 8.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses (maximum 2% of
project cost) 56.91
6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 52.77 7. Margin money for working capital 17.79 Total 1671.32
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 75.39 1259.93*
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of HP 7.98 133.43
(iii) SPV contribution 16.63 277.96
Total 100.00 1671.32
* 84% of eligible project cost of Rs. 15.00 crore.
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Description No. Amount
Primary Machines
A Proposed Machinery for Tool Room
1. Conventional Vertical Milling Machine 1 9.50
2. Conventional Lathe Machine 1 12.00
3. Universal Milling Machine 1 13.45
4. Radial Drill Machine (25 mm) 1 18.75
5. Surface Grinder (400 X 160) 1 18.20
6. Cylindrical Grinder (Dia 200, Centre distance 400 mm) 1 11.58
7. CNC Lathe 1 33.70
8. CNC Vertical Machining Centre (2000 x 500) 1 115.03
9. EDM Die Sinking 1 39.00
10. EDM wire cut 1 39.00
46
S. No. Description No. Amount
11. Mechanical Press (50 Ton) & (100 Ton) 1 21.25
12. Hydraulic press (100 Ton) 1 23.67
13. Gear Hobbing / Cutting 1 9.95
14. Salt Bath 1 11.92
15. Hydraulic Band Saw (300 mm) 1 15.25
16. Surface Plate cast iron (1 M x M) 1 0.91
17. Rapid Prototype shop machine 1 14.95
18. CNC sheet cutting Machine (6mm x 4000 mm) 1 18.25
19. CNC sheet cutting bending (6mm x 4000 mm) 1 24.55
20. Horizontal Boring Machine 1 46.40
21. Centerless Grinding Machine 1 12.00
22. EDM Spark Drill 1 16.00
23. Tool End Cutter 1 11.00
24. Arc Welding Machine 2 5.00
25. Mig Welding Machine 2 8.00
Sub Total 549.31
B Proposed Equipment for Testing Lab
26 Hardness Tester - Rockwell 1 5.80
27 Hardness Tester –Vickers 1 6.30
28. Spectroscope (12 elements) 1 25.22
29. Optical Profile projector Screen 300 mm 1 3.38
30. Electronic Height Gauge 1 4.52
31. Surface Plate Granite 1000 x 1000 1 1.04
32. Quality Control Equipment 1 44.50
33. Partial Discharge Test 1 157.95
34. AC dielectric Test 1 23.40
35. High current load cycle test 1 24.70
36. Impulse voltage test equipment 1 70.86
37. Ten Delta Bridge 1 22.75
38. Coordinate Measuring Machine 1 45.00
Sub Total 435.42
C Machinery for Training Centre
39 Conventional Milling Machine 1 9.78
40 Conventional Lathe Machine (6 ft.) 1 5.30
41 Conventional Lathe Machine (8 ft.) 1 8.22
47
S. No. Description No. Amount
42 Surface Grinder (500 x 500) 1 13.38
43 Welding Lab 1 4.52
44 Cylindrical Grinder (200 mm) 1 14.04
45 Drilling Machine (20 mm) 1 9.45
46 CNC Lathe 1 18.80
47 Computers 10 4.34
48 CAD / CAM software 10 5.00
Sub Total 92.83
Secondary Machines
D Proposed secondary machinery
49 Air Compressor (350 CFM) (100 CFM) 2 16.50
50 DG Set (150 KVA & 66 KVA) 2 17.50
51 Assemble Bench 5 2.50
Sub Total 36.50
Add: installation charges 10.40
Total 1124.46
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
A . (i) SIDBI appraisal report.
(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members.
(v) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered
lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
B. As decided in the TEAC meeting, MSME-DI, Solan to:
(i) Facilitate SPV members to include 3D Printing / Reverse Engineering facilities in
the list of machinery.
(ii) Provide details of all 300 units.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in General Engineering Cluster, Una, Himachal Pradesh.
*******
48
Agenda No. 51.3.10: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Development at Parwanoo Industrial Area, Himachal Pradesh.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its
meeting held on 13.09.18 at Shimla.
(ii) Proposal received from Director of Industries, Governemnt of Himachal Pradesh vide
application ref. No. 13480 dated 06.10.18 & recommended by MSME-DI, Solan.
(iii) MSME-DI, Solan vide letter dated 07.12.18, forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendations.
(iv) Vide letter dated 23.01.19, Office of DC (MSME) sought certain clarifications from
MSME-DI, Solan.
(v) Vide letter dated 10.06.19, MSME-DI, Solan has forwarded the clarifications along with
revised details of Implementing Agency and requested to consider for approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Coorporation Limited.
State : Himachal Pradesh District : Solan Industrial Estate : Parwanoo
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 1.199 acres Area to be developed (acre) 1.199 acres Number and sizes of plots developed 117 Implementing Period 12 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State --
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Himachal Housing & Urban Development
Authority (HIMUDA), Parwanoo As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. HIMUDA having a good track record in implementation of such projects. HIMUDA is already engaged for industrial promotion & development over the state and having its separate bank accounts. Hence, HIMUDA will act as an Implementing Agency for this project under MSE-CDP.
--
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site.
The town is situated on the junction of NH-22 and Parwanoo – Kausali road and is st a distance
--
49
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
of 22 kms from Chandigarh. It is connected by the road from Delhi, Chandigarh, Patiala, Ambala, Shimla, Kinnaur and Sirmour District. The town is at just at a distance of 25 kms from Kasauli and provides direct link to it and the other major cities in the plain. It is gateway to the State and serves as a mojor road link for the transport of goods in the state from the other parts of the country. Kalka railway station is at 2 kms from the town and Kalka – Shimla rail link passes through the township and board gauge.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land document not submitted. Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
The above ID Project is for up-gradation of Infrastructure Development at Parwanoo Industrial Area, Himachal Pradesh
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed which includes officials from Director of Industries, Government of Himachal Pradesh and MSME-DI, Solan
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Received.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Land and boundary wall and fencing, Cost of laying roads and Drainage etc.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
S. No. Perticulars Before Intervention
1. Total Area to be developed (in acres). 1.199 2. No. of plots developed / to be
developed along with size/number of units functioning
117
3. No. of plots allotted/ to be allotted to MSEs
113
4. No. of plots allotted/ to be allotted to Industries other than MSEs
04
5. Employment generated/ expected to be generated
1900
6. Turnover (in Rs. crore) 1000 Justification of the Proposal
No proper draining facilities owing to presence of large anchor units, good connectivity with other parts of country through railways and roads, Parwanoo has immense potential to grow and become an industrial powerhouse. Baddi, one of the largest hub for production of pharmaceuticals, is located at a distance of 28 km and Chandigarh is 40 km away from Parwanoo. Due to its strategic location, it has led to emergence of large no of units in not just engineering sector but in other areas such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, packaging, white goods, brown goods and agricultural products. But, due to infrastructure issues, even the existing industries are reluctant to expand their production facility. Large and medium scale industries such
--
50
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks as MFSI, Micro turners, Gabriel etc. who have made this place their home, are establishing their production facilities at different places due to lack of proper infrastructure.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing --
(ii) Cost of Laying roads 800.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry --
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses --
(v) Water harvesting --
(vi) Drainage 248.00
(vii) Power (Sub-station, Distribution Network, including Street light etc.)
Generation of Non-Conventional Energy
--
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences) --
Sub Total 1048.00
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office Building --
(ii) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre --
(iii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre --
(iv) Bank/Post office --
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets --
(vi) First aid centre, Creche Canteen Facilities --
(vii) Effluent Treatment Facilities --
(viii) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses --
Sub Total --
Total 1048.00
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 76.33 800.00*
(ii) State Government 23.67 248.00
Total 100.00 1048.00
*80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 10.00 crore.
6. Observations:
A. Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency i.e. HIMUDA,
Parwanoo.
(iii) Tangible outcomes before and after implementation of the ID project.
(iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
51
(v) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
B. (i) Land filling & levelling component in all the Industrial Estate should be funded by
State Share.
(ii) IA should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and
proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer
period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of
Himachal Pradesh / HIMUDA.
(iii) Agency charges and GST are not eligible under MSE-CDP.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Infrastructure
Development at Parwanoo Industrial Area, Himachal Pradesh.
*****
52
Agenda No. 51.3.11: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam, Kerala.
Background:
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee in its meeting held on
05.07.18.
Proposal was received from Government of Kerala vide online ref. No. 12085 dated
29.04.18 .
The DPR and focus report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Thrissur along with its
recommendations vide letter dated 19.02.19.
Revised Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Thrissur vide letter dated 30.07.19.
Proposal was deliberated during 67th
meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee
(TEAC) held on 09.08.19 and recommended the proposal to place before the Steering
Committee for In-principle approval, subject to creation of state-of-the-art Design Centre
with latest software & training facilities.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Steel Furniture Cluster District Ernakulam Location of Cluster : Kalady Lok Sabha Constituency : Ernakulam Main Product : Household Steel Furniture, Hotel Furniture, School / College
Furniture, Hospital Furniture, Office Furniture, Garden Furniture, Theatre Furniture, Auditorium Furniture, Shopping Mall Furniture.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium)
Micro - 525 Nos Small - 24 Nos.
Turn over for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Year Amount 2012-13 484.00 2013-14 538.00 2014-15 598.00 2015-16 664.00 2016-17 738.00
Exports for the last five years : (Rs. in Crore)
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 22439 nos. (Direct – 7439 & Indirect – 15000) Technology Details : There is need for firms in the cluster to establish design
studio and cutting facilities and value added component development facilities and testing lab facilities. Basically, cluster core firms confront gaps in terms of Raw material primary processing facilities. There is no facility for quality cutting, value added component development facility in the region. Cluster firms do not have access to capital intensive equipment in terms of advanced component development with respect to steel furniture. They are therefore constrained to produce lower value added products and are also not able to expand the product market mix.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR : The important findings encapsulated in the DSR may be
viewed in terms of critical gaps identified on the raw
53
material primary processing and value-added component development front. These gaps are evidently constraints that merit establishment of relatively capital-intensive equipment. Appropriate interventions could enable development of better quality products and enable the graduation of firms into producing value-added products like hospital furniture, quality auditorium chairs etc.
Main Problems of Cluster : The most critical gaps in the cluster value-chain activities (in the intra-cluster value-chain) may be redressed by way of a facility that comprise raw material primary processing facility and value added component development facility. The common facility basically comprises and facilitates several facilities that will complement existing core activity of steel furniture manufacturing in individual enterprises. The operations within the facility may be viewed in terms of raw material primary processing facility and value added component development facility.
Other Information : --
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC The machinery & Equipment based on latest technology are required to meet the challenges faced by the cluster units.
--
(b.) Location of CFC The facility is proposed to be located in Kombanad Village, Kunnathnadu Taluk, Ernakulam Dist.
--
% age of units in radius of 5km 33% -
% age of units in radius of 10km
67% -
(c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired The land has been acquired by the SPV. Registered land
documents from Revenue Department isrequired.
ii. Title is in name of The title is in the name of SPV. iii. Valuation and its basis The land has been bought by the SPV as
per market rates. iv. Land is sufficient Yes, the land admeasuring 1.3 acre is
sufficient --
v. Change of land use Change of land use may be required.
Document required.
vi. If on lease, duration of lease NA
--
vii Whether lease is legally
tenable
NA
--
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) The total land area is 1.3 acre out of which
24625.34 sq. ft. is built up area.
--
(e.) Rate of construction of
building
The rate of construction of building is Rs.
755/sq.ft approximately. --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Raw material primary processing
facility
Value-added component machines
facility.
--
54
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
g.) Prod capacity of CFC The equipment and technology options
may be viewed in terms of terms of raw
material primary processing facility and
value-added component machines.
(h.) Major Outputs/
Deliverables of CFC, Projected
performance of the cluster after
proposed intervention (in terms
of production, export/domestic
sales and direct/indirect
employment, etc.)
Sl.
No.
Parameter Before
intervention
After
Intervention
1. Nos. of units 549 10-15% increase
2 Turnover (Rs.
in crore)
738.00 1358.00
3 Export (Rs. in
crore)
Nil Competitive import
substitution &
substitute to China
products and there
is good potential for
exports also if
quality could be
enhanced to such
level.
4 Employment
Direct
7,349 Nos 10,439 Nos.
(i.) Pollution clearance
required or not
-- NOC from PCB is
required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 17 members per Shift --
(k.) Revenue generation
mechanism for sustainability of
assets(service/user charges to
be levied, any other-to be
specified)
Total gross revenue in flow works out to Rs. 776.45 lakh per
annum on the basis of operating capacity (on continuous shift
basis) of 80 per cent.
For projection purpose, operating capacity of 80% is
considered for the first year of operation, and 85%
subsequently.
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Name and Address Kalady Steel Consortium Private Limited.
19/258, Vincent Raphel, Moothedan House, Mavelippady, Koovapady P.O., Perumbavoor, Ernakulam, Kerala - 683544
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Pvt. Ltd. --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
The provision for the State Govt. and MSME officials has been provided in MoA and AoA of the SPV but the names will be finalised at the later stage.
Document required.
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
07.03.17.
Document required.
(e.) Number of Members 41 nos.
--
(f.) Bye Laws or MoA and Submitted. Document required.
55
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
AOA submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 160.00 lakh (h.) Paid up capital Rs. 150.00 lakh. (i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Document required. (j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted. Document required.
(k.) SPV specific A/c The SPV specific A/c is in Indian Overseas Bank.
Document required.
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation.
SPV members who include key office bearers of some related industry association have already taken the lead as pursue several joint and co-operative initiatives. These could very well serve as a demonstration for other MSE enterprise clusters in the State.
--
(m.) Technical Institution The name of Technical Institution is Federal Institute of Science and Technology (Angamaly).
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
--
Document required.
(O) Utilities (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
The total power requirement of the CFC is 118 KVA.
--
(b) Water The total water requirement is 2000
litres/day.
--
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division (a.) Implementing Agency Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (K-
BIP), Thiruvananthapuram As per MSE-CDP
guidelines. (b.) Fund receiving Agency Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (K-
BIP), Thiruvananthapuram --
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 Months from date of final approval.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
DPR will be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal.
Required prior to final approval.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meeting of held on 09.08.19 recommended the proposal to place before the Steering Committee for In-principle approval, subject to creation of state-of-the-art Design Centre with latest software & training facilities.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP.
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable
The working capital arrangements have been made from Indian Overseas Bank.
--
56
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
arrangement made)
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by
Cluster Division BEP 23%
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
IRR, Payback period IRR is 29.76% and payback period is 3 year 11 months.
DSCR N/A
Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26.23 %
NPV Rs. 980.15 lakh DER NA (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Particulars ROCE NPV IRR BEP
Base Case 26.23 980.15 29.76 23% With
decline in user charge
by 5 %.
- - - -
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Completed CFCs: 10 nos. Ongoing CFCs: 03 nos.
--
6. Proposed project cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA
1. Land & Site Development 100.00 2. Building & Other Civil Construction 186.00 3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1180.08 4. Misc. fixed assets 10.00 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 30.00 6. Contingencies (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 62.72 7. Margin money for working capital 2.47 Total 1571.27
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1050.00
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kerala 300.00
3 SPV contribution 221.27
Total 1571.27
57
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
A.
(i) Registered land documents in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, registered
lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(vi) Details of production capacity.
(vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(viii) Certificate of SPV formation is required.
(ix) Details of shareholding pattern.
(x) Details of SPV bank account.
(xi) Bye Laws or MA and AOA.
(xii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / CVC guidelines.
S.No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
1. Fully Automatic Panel Bending Machine 1 20 560.59
2. CNC Shearing Machine (with front table
attachment)
1 40 35.85
3. CNC Hydraulic Press brake 1 12 39.02
4. CNC 3 axis Pipe Bending Machine 2 15 169.30
5. Punching Machine (Turret Punch CNC Machine) 1 14 246.85
6. Hydraulic Press Notching Machine (30 ton) 1 12 27.34
7. Transformer 1 0 2.95
8. A.C 3 0 0.90
9. Compressor 1 5 3.06
10. Online UPS 4 0 25.48
11. DG Set 1 0 7.40
12. Computer - Administrative Purpose 1 0 0.80
13. Computer - Fully Automatic Panel Bending
Machine and Punching Machine (Turret Punch
CNC Machine)
1 0 4.35
58
B.
(i) Letter regarding creation of state-of-the-art Design Centre with latest software &
training facilities.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam, Kerala.
*******
59
Agenda No. 51.3.12: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Rice Mill Cluster, Armori, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee in its meeting
held on 20.12.18.
Proposal was received from Government of Maharashtra vide online ref. No. 13927 dated
02.04.19 & recommended by MSME-DI, Nagpur.
Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI, Nagpur vide letter dated 03.06.19.
Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 67th
meetings held on 09.08.19 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee
for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Rice Mill Cluster
District : Gadchiroli
Location of Cluster : Armori
Lok Sabha Constituency : Gadchiroli-Chimur(ST)
Main Product : Broken Rice, Rice Bran, Rice Husk and White Rice
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro : 40 Small : 8 Medium : 0
Turnover for the last five years
Year (Rs. in crore) 2017-18 : 22.00 2018-19 : 25.00 2019-20 : 28.00 2020-21 : 31.00 2021-22 : 33.00
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years :
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 500 Nos.
Technology Details : Cluster Units are operating with conventional technology
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : Cluster units have not upgraded themselves in terms of Technology, Quality & Value addition in their product range over the years.
Main Problems of Cluster : Gadchiroli a predominantly tribal & rural District, about 76% forest covered area with only two to three urban centers. Economy primarily depend on agricultural sector & forest produce. Gadchiroli District is fully affected by naxal-prone activities hence, less economic development. Technology Constraints due to high capital cost. Lack of facilities like Sorting, Polishing, Packaging & Quality Testing. Scope for developing Value added products.
Other Information : Few cluster units are having advanced machines like Color sorter & Silky polishing.
Remaining cluster units sell their products at low cost due to non-availability of advanced processing facilities.
60
Lack of packaging facility for lesser quantity packaging from 05Kg to 25Kg.
Capacity of individual Enterprise in order to create these facilities is out of scope due to high investment.
Less focus of Cluster units on Quality improvement, R&D efforts & Value addition.
Lack of local processing facility for value added product like Rice Bran oil.
Few Cluster units are availing this facility from Hyderabad.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC 1. Few cluster units are having advanced machines like Color sorter & Silky polishing. Remaining cluster units sell their products at low cost due to non-availability of advanced processing facilities. 2. Lack of testing facilities for raw material and finished product, testing like yield strength, Moisture contents in paddy, product analysis for Protein, Iron and Carbohydrate contents etc. 3. Lack of packaging facility for lesser quantity packaging from 05Kg to 25Kg. 4. Capacity of individual Enterprise in order to create these facilities is out of scope due to high investment.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Armori, Dist. Gadchiroli. --
% age of units in radius of 5km
60 --
% age of units in radius of 10km
40 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Land is Identified Registered lease of land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
ii. Title is in name of Shri. Atish Arvind Poreddywar
iii. Valuation and its basis Rs. 87.60 Lakhs
iv. Land is sufficient Yes
v. Change of land use In Process
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Not Applicable
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Not Applicable
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 42,859 --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 850/Sq.Ft --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Rice Bran Solvent Extraction Facility --
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 200 Tonnes per day --
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms
Parameter Before Intervention
After Intervention
Nos. of 48 55
--
61
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
units (nos.) Turnover (Rs. in crore)
33.00 36.30
Export (Rs. in crore)
Nil Export will initiate
Employment 500 550
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Non-polluted Industry NOC from State Pollution Control Board is required.
(j.) Man Power in CFC 51 Nos. --
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
70% of the facilities of CFC will be utilized by the SPV members. Will generate sufficient revenue to take care of recurring expenditures.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Gadchiroli Rice Cluster, C/O JENA Agro Process, A/P Armori, Tal. Armori, Dist. Gadchiroli, Maharashtra - 442605.
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company Act, 2013 --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Representative of Director, MSME-DI, Mumbai and State Government Representative officer designated by Directorate of Industries.
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 01.08.16 --
(e.) Number of Members 20 Nos. --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Given --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 1.00 Lakhs --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 1.00 Lakhs --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Given --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Given --
(k.) SPV specific A/c Bank of India, Armori Branch, district Gadchiroli and account number - 960120110000134.
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
DSR has been approved by Ministry of MSME, Govt. of India in their meeting dated 8th January 2016 in which they have sanctioned Soft Intervention Plan, which is under implementation.
--
(m.) Technical Institution Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), Mysore.
--
(n.) CFC may be utilised by Presently, SPV is having 20 members and Received
62
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
its open ended SPV. About 70% capacity of the proposed CFC will be utilized by existing SPV members.
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
687 KW --
(b) Water 116000 Liters/Day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Not Applicable --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Gadchiroli Rice Cluster. Development Commissioner (Industries), Government of Maharashtra
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC).
--
(c.) Implementation Period 12 Months. As per guidelines.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
Not done at this stage. SIDBI Appraisal Report is required
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC recommended the proposal
(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division:
-- --
(h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Not yet Received. --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(a.) BEP 15.78% --
(b.) IRR, Payback period IRR (After Tax) - 15.55%; IRR (Before Tax) - 24.08%; Payback Period - 5 years.
--
(c.) DSCR 8.22 --
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
20.38% --
(e.) NPV @ 10% 22.33 --
63
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Remarks
(f.) DER 1. SPV (Promoters) Contribution:10.00%; 2. MSECDP Government of India Grant:80.77%; 3. Bank Loan:9.23%.
--
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis 1. Criteria(10% Decrease in Revenue Generation); ROI(146.19%);ROCE Without Grant(146.19%); ROCE With Grant(14.62%);N.P. Ratio(17.53%);DSCR(5.79); BEP as % of Installed Capacity (18.34%); BEP of Sales(355.60); IRR-After Tax(9.03%); 2. Criteria(10% Increase in Direct Exps); ROI(167.98%);ROCE Without Grant(167.98%); ROCE With Grant(16.80%);N.P. Ratio(18.35%);DSCR(6.74); BEP as % of Installed Capacity (18.43%); BEP of Sales(357.28); IRR-After Tax(11.57%); 3. Criteria(Without any change in above parameters); ROI(203.77%);ROCE Without Grant(203.77%); ROCE With Grant(20.38%);N.P. Ratio(22.33%);DSCR(8.22); BEP as % of Installed Capacity (15.75%); BEP of Sales(305.32); IRR-After Tax(15.55%);
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Final Approval-18 Nos. In-Principal Approval-10 Nos.
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in Lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Land 91.98 2. Building 173.95 3. Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 818.48 4. Misc. fixed assets 181.30 5. Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 57.29 6. Contingencies (2% on building and 5% on plant and machinery) 24.55 7. Margin money for working capital 35.33
Total 1382.88
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars %age Amount
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.77 1116.95
2 Government of Maharashtra 0.00 0.00
3 SPV contribution 10.00 138.29
4 Bank Loan 9.23 127.64
Total 100.00 1382.88
64
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No.
Description No. Power Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1 Rice Bran Based Continuous Solvent Extraction Plant
1 450 480.76
2 Steam Generation Plant 1 20 207.83
3 Fully Automatic Water Softening Plant 1 20 3.69
4 Laboratory & its equipments (SEP) 1 0 23.80
5 Rice whitener Super Max 1 53 7.14
6 Multi Grain Colour Sorter 1 50 36.04
7 Rice Silky Polisher 1 51 5.83
8 Rice Length Grader 1 5 3.57
9 Bucket Elevator 1 8 8.17
10 Automatic Rice packaging machine 1 30 41.65
Total 818.48
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
(vi) A minimum of 10% contribution from Government of Maharashtra towards the project
is required.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Rice Mill Cluster, Armori, Gadchiroli, Maharashtra.
*********
65
Agenda No. 51.3.13: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack, Odisha.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Odisha in its meeting held on 04.08.18.
Proposal was received from Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
(IDCO) vide application ref. No. 14040 dated 20.02.19 & recommended by MSME-DI,
Cuttack.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report (DPR) & recommendation was forwarded by
MSME-DI, Cuttack vide letter dated 25.07.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO)
State : Odisha
District : Cuttack
Industrial Estate : IE, Jagatpur
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 343.00 Acres
Area to be developed (acre) 343.00 Acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
There are around 475 units operating within the Industrial Estate.
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
No other ID project is sanctioned till date.
Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (IDCO).
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal yet to be done. Required
66
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
(Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Cuttack Railway station is around 6.8km and Manguli- Chowdwar Railway station is around 6 km from Jagatpur IE. IE, Jagatpur is 200m away from NH-16. Sufficient quantity of water is available and is provided to existing industrial units at IE, Jagatpur.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Land is in possession and in the name of IDCO with clear title.
Required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Yes
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Required
Basis of elements of project Cost
Cost estimates have been made by internal engineering wing of IDCO.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Upgradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system.
--
Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, Jagatpur with components such as roads, drainage complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 2008. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.
--
67
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing: 96.55
(ii) Laying roads 201.46
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 14.90
(iv) Drainage 61.25
(v) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 245.50
(vi) Administrative and Other Services Complex 20.18
(vii) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 20.28
(viii) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 27.44
(ix) First aid centre,Creche Canteen 24.87
(x) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 14.25
Total 726.68
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 576.70
(ii) State Government 149.98
Total 726.68
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) Copy of approved Layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate
are micro.
(vii) IDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and
proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer
period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of
Odisha/ IDCO.
(viii) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by State share.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack, Odisha.
******
68
Agenda No. 51.3.14: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.
Background:
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) of
Punjab held on 18.02.19.
(ii) The proposal was submitted vide online application Ref. No. 14299 dated 31.05.19,
which was also recommended by MSME-DI, Ludhiana.
(iii) Detailed Project Report (DPR) along with Focus Report was forwarded by MSME-DI,
Ludhiana vide their letter dated 10.06.19.
(iv) The proposal was deliberated during 67th
meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal
Committee (TEAC) held on 09.08.19 and the Committee recommended the proposal to
place it before Steering Committee for In-principle approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Sewing Machine Cluster District : Ludhiana Location of Cluster : VPO Daburji, Tehsil Payal Lok Sabha Constituency : Ludhiana Main Product : Sewing machine body, its stand and various parts. No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Units : No. Micro : 91 Small : 11 Total : 102
Turnover for the last five years (Rs in Crore) :
Year Amount 2013-14 : Rs. 7.90 2014-15 : Rs. 8.40 2015-16 : Rs. 9.10 2016-17 : Rs. 8.70 2017-18 : Rs. 9.50
Exports for the last five years (Rs in Crore):
Year Amount 2013-14 : Rs. 0.60 2014-15 : Rs. 0.70 2015-16 : Rs. 0.90 2016-17 : Rs. 0.75 2017-18 : Rs. 1.00
Employment in Cluster : 6000 Technology Details : Conventional Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : A state of the art Centre needs to be created which will have
advanced technologies such as Automatic Casting Plant, VMC 5 Axis, HMC, CNC Turning, Automatic Powder Coating Plant, Automatic Painting Plant, Vacuum Hardening Machine, CNC Robo Drill, CNC Wire Cut, Automatic Machine Hardness Tester, Spectrometer Calibration, Lab Chemical and Metal Testing Lab, CAD/CAM Software, 3D Scanner etc.;
Installation of Non Conventional Energy Generation Equipments like Solar Power Plant etc.;
Establishment of lab and research & development which will have spectroscope, UTM, impact testing machine, polishing machine etc.
In order to train the workers on 5S, 3M & Kaizens, use of 7QC
69
tools for non conformity control, Pokayoke (Fool Proofing), inventory control, productivity (OEE) improvement etc. for skill development. Training Centre needs to be developed.
Main Problems of Cluster : No facilities of Tool Room with latest machines, calibration and testing lab service and training on design software/ designing of components/ dies/ jigs & fixtures in Ludhiana for Sewing Machine Industry. Due to which, the units are not able to produce good quality products to meet the requirements of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and other customers abroad.
Non-availability design facilities, units are not able to design new components or products marketable in Global Market. Hence, there is a need to establish Common Facility Centre at Ludhiana.
Currently, cost of manufacturing the Industrial Sewing Machines are quite higher in India and these are being imported from China, Japan and Taiwan.
By installing this plant, unit holders will be able to manufacture sewing machines at a reasonable cost and it will also serve the dream of Make in India initiative by Hon’ble Prime Minister.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments by Cluster
Division (a.) Justification for CFC The proposed Common Facility
Centre in this cluster will result in technological advancement in terms of development of International Standard Sewing Machines and Industrial Sewing Machines, which is in huge demand and is financially beneficial as compared to domestic Sewing Machine in Ludhiana. Imports will be reduced and quality of the machines will be improved.
There is a need for CFC, which will offer following facilities: Job work of casting through high
pressure unit, machining of the component, paint
Tool Room with Latest Machinery Design Centre for Designing and
Training Calibration & Testing Lab
Services etc. The machines being planned for the
CFC will be of high value and the building for such type of machinery is comprehensive and invites huge financial outlay, which is not possible by any individual catering to Sewing Machine market (comprising of majority of micro enterprises). In this case, CFC will serve the purpose.
--
(b.) Location of CFC VPO Daburji Tehsil Payal Ludhiana. -- % age of units in radius of 5km
20 --
% age of units in radius of 25 --
70
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments by Cluster Division
10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered land
documents in the name of SPV is required
ii. Title is in name of Sewing Machine Technology Park (Regd.)
iii. Valuation and its basis 60.00 lakh (Market price including stamp charges)
iv. Land is sufficient Yes -- v. Change of land use To be taken after purchase of land -- vi. If on lease, duration of lease
Not applicable --
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Not applicable --
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 43560 sq. ft -- (e.) Rate of construction of building
83.00 lakh --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Casting of sewing machine body and other components.
Machining of sewing machine body and its parts.
Paint/ Powder sewing machine and its parts.
Research & Development of New Sewing Machine Model.
Tool Room with latest machinery. Calibration & Testing lab services.
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Casting - 720000 kg per annum, Machine Process - 45600 hours per annum, Paint/Powder Coating - 90000 pc (Machine) per annum
--
(h.)Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Particulars Before CFC After CFC No. of units 102 125 Turnover (Rs. in crore) 950.00 1200.00 Export (Rs. in crore) 100.00 175.00 Employment (nos.) 6000 7500
(i.)Pollution clearance required or not
Yes Required
(j.) Manpower in CFC 35 -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
The Charges to be levied will be decided by Executive Body of SPV after consultation with members.
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency
(IA) Comments of Cluster
Division (a.) Name and Address Sewing Machine Technology Park
(Regd.), Sokhi Road, (Daba Road) Shimlapuri, Ludhiana-141003
Formed
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Society Under ACT XXI of 1860 --
71
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
(c.) Name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
GM-DIC Ludhiana, Director MSME-DI, Ludhiana
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV 23.10.09 -- (e.) Number of Members 26 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital 50 lakh Promoters Contribution -- (h.) Paid up capital as on............
--
(i.) Shareholding Pattern The Contribution would be shared equally & each member would not hold more than 10%.
Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
Submitted Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c M/s Sewing Machine Technology Park. (Rrgd.) Bank - Bank of Baroda, Branch - Industrial Area, Partap Nagar, Ludhiana A/c No. 01040200001537 IFSC Code - BARB0INDLUD
--
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
The SPV Members visited Mohali Cluster which has motivated them to set up a CFC.
--
(m.) Technical Institution MSME-D, Ludhiana -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
All members agreed that information about services available at CFC will be shared with non- SPV members units of cluster so that they can also get the benefit of facilities available at CFC. The target is to utilize 60% of capacity of CFC in 1
st year of running & capacity
utilization will be gradually increased to 100%
Required
(o.) (a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
500 KW or 1080000 Units --
(b) Water Submersible pump -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities N/A --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh
As per MSE-CDP guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency
(c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 months from issuance of final approval letter.
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) has cleared the project on 18.02.19
Required
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
Received TEAC recommended the proposal
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
Recommended
(g.) Comments of Cluster -- --
72
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Bank of Baroda agreed to sanction Working Capital Loan. State Government Contribution of 10% in the project of CFC in Sewing Machine Cluster has been considered.
--
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments of Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 35.16% -- (b.) IRR, Payback period 4 Years Approx. -- (c.) DSCR 3.21 -- (d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
25.31% --
(e.) NPV Rs. 127.87 lakh -- (f.) DER 2.0
Debt- Rs. 100.00 lakh Equity- Rs. 50.00 lakh
--
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 10% reduction of capacity or fall in sales.
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Two CFCs- Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali and Oil Expeller, Ludhiana are under process.
--
6. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount
(i) Land and its Development 60.00 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 83.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1266.97 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 42.86 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost 24.50 (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery) 18.00
Total 1495.33
7. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Amount
(i) Govt. of India grant under MSE-CDP 80.00 1195.85 (ii) Govt. of Punjab contribution 10.00 149.48 (iii) SPV contribution 3.34 50.00 (iv) Bank loan / others 6.66 100.00
Total 100.00 1495.33
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. .No. Description No. Power
Requirement (HP/KW)
Cost
1. Molding Machines Including - Electrical Control Panel, Hydraulic operated punchout System, Track Runway for
1 181 kw 567.34
73
S. .No. Description No. Power Requirement
(HP/KW)
Cost
Casting, Hopper with Load Cells, Mixer and Cooler, Belt Conveyor set, Pully, Pouring System, Technical support , Fabrication, Installation & Commissioning
2. EOT Crane 1 20kw 28.56
3. Furnace Accessories 1 - 17.70
4. Vertical Machining Centre 1 32 kw 61.22
5. Special Purpose Machinery 15 90 kw 106.20
6. Horizontal Machining Centre 1 32 kw 256.43
7. Powder Coating Plant 1 16 kw 41.30
8. 3D Scanner 1 1 kw 8.49
9. Spectrometre 1 3 kw 21.54
10. Hardness Tester 1 4 kw 3.36
11. CAD CAM Software 1 - 5.46
12. Air Pollution Control System for Induction Furnace and Machining Plant
1 16 kw 11.80
13. Furnance Duty Transformer 1 - 8.49
14. Genset 1 - 22.45
15. Power Point 1 240 KW 21.54
16. Furnace Transformer 1 240 KW 7.67
17. Melting Furnace 2 240 KW 10.39
18. Furnace Selector Switches 2 240 KW 2.12
19. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Lathe 1 24 KW 19.94
20. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Lathe 1 24 KW 27.49
21. Surface Plate 1 - 0.94
22. Zero Zero Grade Slip Gauge Box 1 - 4.13
23. Calliper Checker 1 - 0.12
24. Height Master 1 - 1.77
25. Pressure Gauge 1 - 1.48
26. Digital Pressure Gauge 1 - 0.35
27. Dial Calibrater 1 - 2.36
28. Main LT with APFC Panel 1 - 6.32
Total 1266.97
74
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents with clear title in the name of SPV.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(iv) Copy of Article of Association & Memorandum of Association.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(vi) Details of shareholding pattern.
(vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of installed
capacity.
(viii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(ix) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in the cluster are
Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.
*******
75
Agenda No. 51.3.15: Proposal for In-principle for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at IGC,
Parbatsar, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 01.07.19.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan
vide letter dated 18.07.19.
Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14459 dated 24.07.19 & recommended by MSME-
DI, Jaipur.
MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 14.08.19 forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendation.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Nagaur
Industrial Estate : IGC Parbatsar
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 86.86 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 86.86 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 4000 9 2000 36 1500 17 1000 16 700 17 500 30
Total 125
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
ID centre –Gogelao, Nagaur was sanctioned on 05.03.97.
Performance of ID projects in State Till date out of 19 ID projects, 15 projects have been completed.
76
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd.,(RIICO)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
DPR will be appraised from SIDBI after getting in principle approval from GoI.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes --
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Not Applicable
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :
Yes Required
Basis of elements of project Cost The estimates are based on PWD Road BSR-2018 (Nagaur District), PWD Building BSR-2017 (Nagaur District) and Electrical BSR 2013.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will cater more investment and employment.
--
Justification of the Proposal Need of Improvement in existing Infrastructure.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing 99.18 (ii) Cost of laying roads 212.21 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 7.40 (iv) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 96.28 (v) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 10.80 (vi) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 41.25 (vii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 10.80
Total 477.92
77
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 371.57
(ii) RIICO contribution 106.35
Total 477.92
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(iv) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Rajasthan/ RIICO, Jaipur.
(v) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by State share.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at IGC, Parbatsar, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
********
78
Agenda No. 51.3.16: Proposal for In-principle for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Peepalawa, Banswara, Rajasthan.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 01.07.19.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan
vide letter dated 18.07.19.
Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14457 dated 24.07.19 & recommended by MSME-
DI, Jaipur.
MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 23.08.19 forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendation.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Banswara
Industrial Estate : Up-gradation of Infrastructure Facilities at Industrial Area Peepalwa District Banswara
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 128.27acres
Area to be developed (acre) 128.27 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 4000 15 2000 39 1500 33 1000 67 700 8
Total 162
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Till date out of 19 ID projects, 15 projects have been completed.
79
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd.,(RIICO)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
DPR will be appraised from SIDBI after getting in-principle approval from GOI
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes --
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
NA
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes
Basis of elements of project Cost
The estimates are based on PWD BSR Banswara-2016 & Based on PWD Building BSR 2015.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will cater more investment by the existing units and will also
--
Justification of the Proposal Need of Improvement in existing Infrastructure.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by
IA (i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing 102.23 (ii) Cost of laying roads 255.31 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 4.47 (iv) Drainage 113.92 (v) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 21.69
Total 497.62
80
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 398.10
(ii) RIICO contribution 99.52
Total 497.62
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Copy of approved Layout plan.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(v) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Rajasthan/ RIICO, Jaipur.
(vi) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by State share.
(vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(viii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at Peepalawa, Banswara, Rajasthan.
******
81
Agenda No. 51.3.17: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 01.07.19.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan
vide letter dated 18.07.19.
Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14195 dated 03.09.19 & recommended by MSME-
DI, Jaipur.
MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 03.09.19 forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendation.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Jaisalmer
Industrial Estate : Industrial Area Jaisalmer
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
53.40 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 53.40 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 1500 28 1000 42 700 35 500 16
Total 121
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
ID centre – Kishanghat, Jaisalmer was sanctioned on 04.10.10.
Performance of ID projects in State Till date out of 19 ID projects, 15 projects have been completed.
82
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
DPR will be appraised after getting in-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes --
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
NA
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Required
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimates related to boundary wall & road work etc. are based on the PWD BSR, 2013 (Building works) and PWD BSR, 2013 (Road works) for district Jaisalmer. The contingencies charges of 4.5% has been considered in all the estimates based on PWD BSR, 2013 (Building works) and PWD BSR, 2013 (Road works) of district Jaisalmer.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will cater more investment by the existing units
Justification of the Proposal Need of Improvement in infrastructure.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of land filling / levelling including boundary wall and fencing 7.88 (ii) Cost of laying roads 268.40 (iii) Power distribution, Street light arrangement etc. 286.59
Total 562.87
83
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 366.30
(ii) RIICO contribution 196.57
Total 562.87
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(iv) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Rajasthan/ RIICO, Jaipur.
(v) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by State share.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
******
84
Agenda No. 51.3.18: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at MTC, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 01.07.19.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan
vide letter dated 18.07.19.
Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14458 dated 24.07.19 & recommended by MSME-
DI, Jaipur.
MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 23.08.19 forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendation.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Ajmer
Industrial Estate : Up-gradation of Infrastructure Facilities at Industrial Area M.T.C. Ajmer
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 17.22 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 17.22 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 22008 1 2000 3 1500 3 1000 23 700 6
Total 36
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Till date out of 19 ID projects, 15 projects have been completed.
85
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
DPR will be appraised after getting in-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes --
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
NA
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Required
Basis of elements of project Cost
The estimates are based on PWD Road BSR-2016 (Ajmer Circle), PWD Building BSR-2013 (Ajmer Circle), PWD BSR NH (Jaipur Circle) 2016 and PWD electrical BSR-2013.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will cater more investment by the existing units
Justification of the Proposal Need of Improvement in infrastructure.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(iv) Cost of laying roads 77.61 (v) Drainage 61.22 (vi) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc. 16.28
Total 155.11
86
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 123.11
(ii) RIICO contribution 32.00
Total 155.11
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(v) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate
are micro.
(vi) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Rajasthan/ RIICO, Jaipur.
(vii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at MTC, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
******
87
Agenda No. 51.3.19: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Makrana, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
Background
The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of Government
of Rajasthan in its meeting held on 01.07.19.
Proposal along with Detailed Project Report was forwarded by Government of Rajasthan
vide letter dated 18.07.19.
Proposal was received from Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd. vide application ref. No. 14460 dated 24.07.19 & recommended by MSME-
DI, Jaipur.
MSME-DI, Jaipur vide letter dated 14.08.19 forwarded the proposal along with their
recommendation.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation (RIICO) Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Nagaur
Industrial Estate : Makrana
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre): 286.72 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 286.72 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed Area (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 4000 130 2000 80 1500 57 700 27 500 9
Total 303
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
ID centre –Gogelao, Nagaur was sanctioned on 05.03.97.
Performance of ID projects in State Till date out of 19 ID projects, 15 projects have been completed.
88
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd.,(RIICO)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
DPR will be appraised from SIDBI after getting In-principle approval from GOI
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Not applicable
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes Required
Basis of elements of project Cost
The estimates are based on PWD Road BSR-2018 (Nagaur District) and PWD Building BSR-2017 (Nagaur District).
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Up-gradation of Infrastructure facilities will cater more investment by the existing units and will also provide employment opportunities.
--
Justification of the Proposal Need of Improvement in existing infrastructure.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated by IA
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall and fencing 38.25 (ii) Cost of laying roads 222.99 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 7.40 (iv) Drainage 63.20
Total 331.84
89
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 244.52
(ii) RIICO contribution 87.32
Total 331.84
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(v) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of
Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for
relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the
Government of Rajasthan/ RIICO, Jaipur.
(vi) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by State share.
(vii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Estate at Makrana, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
*******
90
Agenda No. 51.3.20: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Sweater Cluster, Coonoor, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu.
Background:
The proposal was forwarded by Government of Tamil Nadu vide letter dated 16.06.16.
The proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 43rd
meeting of Steering Committee,
held on 09.03.17 (as a special case on the request of Principal Secretary, MSME, Government
of Tamil Nadu, without technical examination of Technical Division & recommendations of
Technical Committee.
After, multiple correspondences between IA and this Office, Technical Division vide their
U.O. Note dated 13.02.18, informed that the proposal cannot be recommended in its present
form, as it would function as complete manufacturing unit. The same was communicated to
IA, SPV and MSME-DI, Chennai vide e-mail dated 16.02.18.
In response to the views of Office of DC (MSME), Small Industries Product Promotion
Organization Ltd. (SIPPO), vide their letter dated 07.03.18, addressed to AS&DC (MSME)
informed that the cluster consist of all women traditional people (about 200-300 members),
livelihood of whom is dependent on proposed CFC and thus requested for sanction of the
same.
In view of the representation of SIPPO Ltd, AS&DC (MSME) directed MSME-DI, Chennai
to depute suitable officers along with representatives from State Government / IA to study
and submit a comprehensive factual report.
After undertaking the study, MSME-DI, Chennai vide their e-mail dated 16.04.18 recommend
the proposal with following Comments:
“The proposed CFC is not a production centre because there is no stitching facility
provision at CFC. In case of ordinary/small quantity orders all processing activities will be
carried out at the unit level only, except knitting. In case of bulk demand/export demand then
only the individual entrepreneur will utilize all the facilities available at CFC. Moreover, the
huge demand never allow the CFC to eliminate any entrepreneur from the industry rather it
attract new entrepreneurs towards this Industry”.
The proposal was discussed during Technical Committee meeting held on 13.07.18,
committee recommended the proposal to place before Steering Committee with reduced
Plant & Machinery and subject to modification of the DPR.
The proposal was discussed during the 47th
meeting of Steering Committee held on 25.07.18,
wherein, Committee directed to submit the revised proposal with enhanced State
Government contribution.
Revised DPR conveying 10% of Govt. of Tamil Nadu contribution received on 20.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Sweater Cluster
District : Nilgiris
Location of Cluster : Coonoor
Lok Sabha Constituency : Nilgiris (SC)
91
Main Product :
Baby Set Sweaters, Ladies Choli, Scarf, Sweater, Muffler, Shawl, Door Mat
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro : 100
Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last five years:
2019-20 5.31 2020-21 9.10 2021-22 9.80 2022-23 9.80 2023-24 10.50
Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last five years:
Nil
Employment in Cluster : 60 Nos
Technology Details : Currently units in the cluster are using conventional technology
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a common facility centre.
Main Problems of Cluster : Non availability of Raw Material Bank Non availability of Advanced Technology Non availability of Quality control facility
Other Information : NA
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Justification for CFC To have facilities like Advance technology, Quality Control Facilities, R&D Facilities etc.
-
(b.) Location of CFC No.5/308 situated at R.S.No.308 (old no.397/2), Hubbathalai panchayat, Coonoor Taluk, Peria Karumpalam, Nilgiris District.
-
% age of units in radius of 5km
75 -
% age of units in radius of 10km
25 -
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired Lease -
ii. Title is in name of Coonoor Sweater Cluster Women Association -
iii. Valuation and its basis 5.14 lakhs -
iv. Land is sufficient Yes -
v. Change of land use The SPV agreed to get the land classification change to Industrial use
Required.
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
-- Registered Lease Deed in the name of SPV for a duration of at least 30 years.
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
yes -
(d.) Total Building area(sq Ground floor of 158.50 sq. mt. and first floor of -
92
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
ft) 69.50 sq. mt.
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs.189 per sq. ft (Renovation) -
(f.) Main Facility Proposed Computerized Knitting machines and design systems.
Modern Embroidery machine. Buttoning machine. Packing and labelling machines..
-
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC 5,76,000 sets of sweater per year -
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/ domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
-- Required.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
-- Required
(j.) Man Power in CFC -- -
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service / user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
-- -
(l.) -- -
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Name and Address Nilgiris Woolen Cluster Private Limited (NWCPL) 128, Attadi Road, Coonoor, Nilgiris District, Tamilnadu Pin 643101
-
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Private Limited -
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
Secretary, MSME, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Additional Industrial Advisor, MSMEDI, Chennai
-
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
26.06.13 --
(e.) Number of Members 60 --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
-- Required
(g.) Authorized Share Capital
-- --
(h.) Paid up capital -- --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern -- Required
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
-- Required
93
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(k.) SPV specific A/c -- --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
-- -
(m.) Technical Institution -- -
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
-- -
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
52.50 KW -
(b) Water -- -
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities
-- -
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) Implementing Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., (SIDCO)
--
(b.) Fund receiving Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., (SIDCO)
--
(c.) Implementation Period 24 Months --
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
The proposal was recommended by Government of Tamil Nadu during SLSC held on 05.08.15 and 27.01.16
--
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
-- --
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
-- TEAC Recommended the proposal.
(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
-- --
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks
(a.) BEP Rs. 84.19 lakh -
(b.) IRR, Payback period Before Tax – 66.99% After Tax - 46.91% -
94
(c.) DSCR Rs.97.84 lakh (1st year) -
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
39.50% -
(e.) NPV 1st year – Rs. 54.77 lakh
2nd
year – Rs.57.85 lakh -
(f.) DER -- -
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- -
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
-- -
6. Revised Project Cost is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost
Revised Project Cost
(i) Land and its Development 0.50 0.50
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 4.64 4.64
(iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 662.81 233.76
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 22.69 22.69
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
22.97 5.70
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
33.23 11.69
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 117.20 5.00
Total Project Cost 864.04 283.98
7. Revised means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost
Revised Project Cost
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 777.64 227.18
(ii) Grant-in-aid from Government of Tamil Nadu 0.00 28.40
(iii) SPV contribution 5.00 28.40
(iv) Bank Loan 81.40 0.00
Total 864.04 283.98
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Quantity Power Amount
1. Shima Seiki – Model SSR 112 SV 7 G –
Computerized flat knitting machine
5 units 9 kw 164.66
2. Shima Seiki – Model SDS – One Apex 3 –
Design System
1 0.75 kw
3. Kaja Button Machines 5 5.6 kw 9.97
4. Embroidery Machine 1 3 kw 18.37
5. Packing unit 1 6 kw 4.27
6. Washing, Drying and Ironing units 1 3.6 kw 10.93
7. Quality Control Equipment 1 2.25 kw 4.56
8. Labelling machine 1 1.5 kw 1.90
95
9. Electrification 5.00
10. 2% as transport, erection charges etc 14.12
Total 233.78
9. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years in the name of SPV.
(ii) Revised SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Tangible outcomes like number of units, turnover, export, employment etc. in the format
provided.
(iv) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.
(v) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
(vi) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate
are (a) Micro (b) SC/ST& (c) Women owned, as the case may be.
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(viii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up Common Facility
Centre (CFC) in Sweater Cluster, Coonoor, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu.
*********
96
Agenda No. 51.3.21: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park at
Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana in its meeting held on 28.12.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14011 dated 18.02.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 09.07.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Yadadri Bhuvanagiri. Industrial Estate : Industrial park at Bhongir (Existing)
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 64 acres Area to be developed (acre) 64 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 59
After further subdivision, No. of plots – 94 Plot Size (in acres) No. of plots < 0. 25 15 0.26 - 0.5 42 0.51 – 1.0 32 > 1.01 9 Total No. of Plots 94
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing infrastructure through development of industrial areas. TSIIC has
--
97
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks so far developed more than 160 industrial parks and created land banks for the future industrial development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Project site is well connected by road, rail and air. The project site has excellent road network through NH 163 & SH 17. The nearest railway station to the project site is Bhongir located at about 3.5 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 75 km towards southwest from the site. Adequate water & power supply facilities in the vicinity/IP.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Current Interventions
After interventions
Existing units (Nos.) 83 93 (additional upto 2025)
Total Investment (Rs. in crore.)
73.17 4.70 additional upto 2025)
Total employment (Nos.) 1029 Direct – 120 Indirect-240
Total turnover (Rs. in crore)
122.21 6.90 additional upto 2025)
Total Exports (Rs. in crore)
2.00 --
Justification of the Proposal The proposed upgradation of infrastructure --
98
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for the local people. The total employment generation is estimated at 450 persons. The upgradation of infrastructure in the IP Bhongir will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and setting up of new units in the allotted plots
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 76.50
(ii) Cost of laying roads (CC Roads) 212.14
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 85.31
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 67.46
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street
light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
74.96
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 546.37
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 28.00
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 17.50
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets ` 42.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 17.50
Sub Total 147.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 20.80
Total 714.17
99
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 77.27 551.82
(ii) State Government 22.73 162.35
Total 100.00 714.17
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents with clear title, in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of
operating units in present project.
(iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(v) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park
at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana.
*****
100
Agenda No. 51.3.22: Proposal for In-principle approval for up-gradation of Industrial Parks
at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana in its meeting held on 28.12.18.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14013 dated 18.02.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 09.07.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited. State : Telangana District : Rangareddy. Industrial Estate : Autonagar at Hyderabad (Existing)
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 221.29 acres Area to be developed (acre) 221.29 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 1410
Plot Size (in acres) No. of plots < 0. 25 1292 0.26 - 0.5 62 0.51 – 1.0 35 1.01 – 3.0 21 Total No. of Plots 1410
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing infrastructure through development of industrial areas. TSIIC has
--
101
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks so far developed more than 160 industrial parks and created land banks for the future industrial development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Autonagar Hyderabad is well connected by road network. Site abuts NH 65 that connects Pune & Machilipatnam. Nearest major railway station to Autonagar is Secunderabad Railway Station located at 18 km north. Nearest airport to Autonagar is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 25 km southwest. Water supply system exists in Autonagar. Water is drawn from dedicated industrial water supply line and GHMC water supply pipeline. 33/11 kV substation exists in close proximity to Autonagar Hyderabad.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Current Interventions
After interventions
Existing units (Nos.)
1350 100 (additional upto 2023)
Total Investment (Rs. in crore.)
949.08 37.50 additional upto 2023)
Total employment (Nos.)
7915 Direct – 500 Indirect-1000
Total turnover (Rs. in crore)
225.36 11.23 additional upto 2023)
Total Exports (Rs. in crore)
-- --
102
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in the
Autonagar Hyderabad will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for the local people.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Site fencing & leveling 97.00
(ii) Cost of laying Cement Concrete roads 227.18
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 153.87
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 97.50
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
224.00
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 829.55
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets ` 38.50
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 154.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 40.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 30.71
Total 1054.26
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(iii) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 70.53 743.60 (iv) State Government 29.47 310.66
Total 100.00 1054.26
103
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents with clear title, in the name of Implementing Agency.
(ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of
operating units in present project.
(iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over
and above the approved project cost.
(v) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(vii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for up-gradation of Industrial
Parks at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
*****
104
Agenda No. 51.3.23: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at
Sultanpur, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana in its meeting held on 26.03.19.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14433 dated 17.07.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 08.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Sangareddy. Industrial Estate : Industrial Park Sultanpur (Greenfield IP for FICCI Ladies
Organisation).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 552.70 acres Area to be developed (acre) 48.39 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 36
Plot Size (in acres) No. of plots 0.5 – 1.0 28 1.0 – 1.2 8 Total No. of Plots 36
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing infrastructure through development of industrial areas. TSIIC has
--
105
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks so far developed more than 160 industrial parks and created land banks for the future industrial development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres. In additional, TSIIC is developing Kakatiya Mega Textile Park in over 1000 acres at Warangal.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The nearest railway station to the site is Lingampally located at ~15 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 60 km south of project site. The nearest ports to the project site are Machilipatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port. Water for the proposed industrial park will be sourced from Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline. Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited (TSSPDCL) and Transmission Corporation of Telangana Limited (TSTRANSCO) are responsible for undertaking bulk supply and distribution in the area. A 33/11 kV substation is proposed at Sultanpur IP (overall industrial park).
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The development of infrastructure in the industrial park will attract new units. IP
Required in format.
106
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Sultanpur FICCI Ladies Organization is expected to induce investments of Rs 24 Cr by the new units within the next five years. In Addition, it is expected to generate employment to about 240 direct and about 480 indirect.
Justification of the Proposal The development of IP Sultanpur-FLO for MSEs in General Industrial Sector is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants to the allied industrial segments in the region. In addition, the development of IP is expected to generate direct & indirect employment opportunities
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 100.45
(ii) Cost of laying roads (CC Roads) 196.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 116.01
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 67.63
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
252.08
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 762.17
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 150.50
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 27.38
Total 940.05
107
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 77.52 728.80
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 22.47 211.25
Total 100.00 940.05
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title,
complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc..
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the
purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall
be borne by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up new Industrial
Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
*****
108
Agenda No. 51.3.24: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at
Kallem, Jangaon District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana during its meeting held on 26.03.19.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14431 dated 17.07.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 08.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Jangaon. Industrial Estate : Industrial Park Kallem (Greenfield).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 133.04 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 56.89 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 250
Plot Size (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 549 sq. m 221 550-600 sq. m 15 600-650 sq. m. 8 Above 650 sq. m 6 Total No. of Plots 250
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing infrastructure through development of industrial areas. TSIIC has so far developed more than 160 industrial parks and created land banks for the future industrial
--
109
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres. In additional, TSIIC is developing Kakatiya Mega Textile Park in over 1000 acres at Warangal.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Currently, site is accessible only through a village road that connects to NH 163 near Pembarthi. The nearest railway station is Pembarti Railway station which is about 6.5 km away & Jangaon railway station is located at ~about 10 km. The nearest airport is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 115 km. The nearest ports to the project site are Krishnapatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port. Water for the proposed industrial park can be sourced from the Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline that passes at a distance of less than 1 km. Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited (TSNPDCL) and Transmission Corporation of Telangana Limited (TSTRANSCO) are responsible for undertaking bulk supply and distribution in the area. A 33/11 kV substation exists at about 10 km from project site at Jangaon. A 220/132 kV substation is located at Kolanupaka at 12 km.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TS SSR.
--
110
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Tangible Outcomes of the project
The development of infrastructure in the industrial park will attract new units. IP Kallem is expected to induce investments of Rs 250 Cr by the new units within the next five years. In Addition, it is expected to generate employment to about 5000 direct and about 10000 indirect.
Required in format.
Justification of the Proposal The proposed development of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for the local people. The total employment generation is estimated at 15000 persons. The development of infrastructure in the IP Kallem will facilitate setting up of new units in the allotted plots.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 100.48
(ii) Cost of laying roads 258.71
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 121.93
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 72.93
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
226.64
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 810.69
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 154.00
3. Sewage Treatment Facilities 75.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 31.19
Total 1070.88
111
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 72.47 776.10
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 27.53 294.78
Total 100.00 1070.88
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title,
complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc..
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by
the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up new Industrial
Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District, Telangana.
*****
112
Agenda No. 51.3.25: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at
Warangal, Warangal (Urban) District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana in its meeting held on 26.03.19.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14432 dated 17.07.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 08.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Warangal Urban Industrial Estate : Industrial Park Warangal (Greenfield IP for Women Entrepreneurs).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 171.83 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 51.93 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 176
Plot Size (sq. mtr.) No. of plots 0-500 sq. m 15 500-700 sq. m 117 700-1000 sq. m. 25 1000-1500 sq. m 11 Above 1500 sq. m 8 Total No. of Plots 176
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing infrastructure through development of industrial areas. TSIIC has so far developed more than 160 industrial
--
113
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks parks and created land banks for the future industrial development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres. In additional, TSIIC is developing Kakatiya Mega Textile Park in over 1000 acres at Warangal.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The project site is located near Rampur village off NH 163 at a distance of 3 km. The nearest railway station to the site is Kazipet located at ~8 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 165km southwest of project site. The nearest ports to the project site are Krishnapatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port. Water for the proposed industrial park can either be sourced from (1) Devudula Canal (2) Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited (TSNPDCL) and Transmission Corporation of Telangana Limited (TSTRANSCO) are responsible for undertaking bulk supply and distribution in the area. A 33/11 kV substation exists at Madikonda ~4km from the project site. Necessary power supply infrastructure needs to be developed.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TSSSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The development of infrastructure in the industrial park will attract new units. IP
Required in format.
114
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Warangal is expected to induce investments of Rs 176 Cr by the new units within the next five years. In Addition, it is expected to generate employment to about 1760 direct and about 3520 indirect.
Justification of the Proposal The development of IP Warangal for MSEs in garments sector is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants to the textiles & Garments and allied industrial segments in the region. In addition, the development of IP is expected to generate direct & indirect employment opportunities for the local people.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 112.41
(ii) Cost of laying roads (internal roads – CC) 208.70
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 111.71
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Storm Water Drainage 64.20
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
141.25
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 668.27
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 154.00
3. Sewage Treatment Facilities 80.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 27.07
Total 929.34
5. Proposed means of finance:
115
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 76.60 711.80
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 23.40 217.54
Total 100.00 929.34
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title,
complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc..
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by
the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up new Industrial
Estate at Warangal, Warangal (Urban) District, Telangana.
*****
116
Agenda No. 51.3.26: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate
at Buggapadu, Khammam District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana during its meeting held on 26.03.19.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14434 dated 17.07.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 19.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Khammam. Industrial Estate : Industrial Park Buggapadu (Greenfield).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 142.54 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 56.14 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total No. of plots – 52
Plot Size (acre.) No. of plots < 0.5 33 0.5-1 acre 09 1- 1.25 acre 04 Above 1.25 acre 06 Total No. of Plots 52
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing infrastructure through
--
117
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks development of industrial areas. TSIIC has so far developed more than 160 industrial parks and created land banks for the future industrial development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres. In additional, TSIIC is developing Kakatiya Mega Textile Park in over 1000 acres at Warangal.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The proposed site is approachable through a blacktopped single lane road connecting Sathupally and Patwarigudem village and further to Palvancha. The nearest railway station to the site is Khammam located at ~90 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Gannavaram airport near Vijayawada at 90 km from project site. Rajahmundry Airport and Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad are located at ~120 km and ~ 290 km from the project site. The nearest ports to the project site are Kakinada Deep Water Port & proposed Machilipatnam Port. Water for the proposed industrial park can be sourced from the Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline. Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited (TSNPDCL) and Transmission Corporation of Telangana Limited (TSTRANSCO) are responsible for undertaking bulk supply and distribution in the area. A 33/11 kV substation exists within the premises of Mega Food Park, which is adjacent to the project site.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
118
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TSSSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The development of infrastructure in the industrial park will attract new units. IP Buggapadu is expected to induce investments of about Rs 50 Cr by the new units within the next five years. In Addition, it is expected to generate employment to about 415 direct and about 830 indirect.
Required in format.
Justification of the Proposal The development of IP Buggapadu for MSEs in Food Processing, general engineering & allied sector is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants to the food processing and allied industrial segments in the region. In addition, the development of IP is expected to generate direct & indirect employment opportunities for the local people.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 87.05
(ii) Cost of laying roads (internal roads – CC) 208.13
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 126.63
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Drainage 74.25
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
63.37
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 589.43
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 154.00
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00
119
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 24.70
Total 848.13
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 75.35 639.14
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 24.65 208.99
Total 100.00 848.13
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title,
complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up new Industrial
Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam District, Telangana.
*****
120
Agenda No. 51.3.27: Proposal for In-principle approval for setting up new Industrial Estate at
Autonagar, Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam Mandal in Peddapalli
District, Telangana.
Background
(i) The proposal was recommended by State Level Steering Committee (SLSC) of
Telangana in its meeting held on 26.03.19.
(ii) Proposal was received from Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Limited, Hyderabad vide application ref. No. 14477 dated 01.08.19 & recommended by
MSME-DI, Hyderabad.
(iii) Proposal along with recommendations was forwarded by MSME-DI, Hyderabad vide
letter dated 19.08.19.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Peddapalli. Industrial Estate : Autonagar Kundanpally (Greenfield IP).
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes.
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 25.97 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 25.97 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 250
Plot Size (sq. m.) No. of plots 0-150 104 150-200 54 200-400 36 400-500 56 Total No. of Plots 250
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), Hyderabad.
As per MSECDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Telangana State Industrial infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSIIC) established in the year 2014, is a Telangana State Government initiative for providing
--
121
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks infrastructure through development of industrial areas. TSIIC has so far developed more than 160 industrial parks and created land banks for the future industrial development. Currently, TSIIC is developing prestigious and priority projects of Government of Telangana including Hyderabad Pharma City in over 19,000 acres, Zaheerabad National Investment & Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in over 12,500 acres and Largest Electronic Manufacturing Clusters in the Country at e-City in over 600 acres and Maheshwaram in over 300 acres. In additional, TSIIC is developing Kakatiya Mega Textile Park in over 1000 acres at Warangal.
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle approval.
Required
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Proposed site for establishing Autonagar (AN) is near Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam Mandal in Peddapalli district (LWE District1) of Telangana State. The project site is located near Kundanpally Village abutting SH 1 & NH 63 is at a distance of ~21 km. The nearest railway station to the site is Ramagundam railway station located at ~2.5 km. The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at ~ 260 km southwest of project site. The nearest ports to the project site are Proposed Machilipatnam Port and Kakinada Deep Water Port. Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited (TSNPDCL) and Transmission Corporation of Telangana Limited (TSTRANSCO) are responsible for undertaking bulk supply and distribution in the area. A 33/11 kV substation exists abutting the project site.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in possession of land required for the development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title.
Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Yes.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the project has been constituted.
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes. Document required.
122
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Basis of elements of project Cost
Estimated have been prepared based on TSSSR.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The development of infrastructure in the Autonagar will attract new units. AN Kundanpally is expected to induce investments of Rs 62.50 crore by the new units within the next five years. In Addition, it is expected to generate employment to about 2500 direct and about 5000 indirect.
Required in format.
Justification of the Proposal The development of Autonagar (AN) Kundanpally for MSEs in automobile, auto servicing & allied sector is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants to the automobile and allied industrial segments in the region. In addition, the development of AN is expected to generate direct & indirect employment opportunities. The IP is expected to generate both direct and indirect employment. The total direct employment is estimated to be is about 2500. The indirect employment expected to be created by the cluster would be about 5000. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 7500. The proposed development of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for the local people.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 53.07
(ii) Cost of laying roads 228.20
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 104.97
(v) Water harvesting 10.00
(vi) Drainage 69.24
(vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy.
250.91
(viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00
Sub Total 736.39
2 Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00
(ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00
(iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50
123
S.No. Particulars Proposed Cost by IA
(iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00
Sub Total 150.50
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.86
Total 990.75
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Percentage Proposed by IA
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 75.74 750.43
(ii) Govt. of Telangana 24.26 240.32
Total 100.00 990.75
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency with clear title,
complying zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc..
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan.
(iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format.
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
(vii) TSIIC Ltd., Hyderabad should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place
of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose
for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne
by the Government of Telangana / TSIIC.
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro /
SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
(ix) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for In-principle Approval for setting up new Industrial
Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam Mandal in Peddapalli District, Telangana.
*****
124
Agenda No. 51.4.1: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at
Gopalganj Village, P.O. Nirsa, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide email dated 09.07.19, Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development
Corporation (JIIDCO) Ltd., Ranchi submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land documents with clear title, signed by Competent Authority and complying with zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. in the name of Implementing Agency.
Vide e-mail dated 08.08.19, Govt. of Jharkhand informed that JIADA will be the Implementing Agency for the project and the Grant-in-Aid will be disbursed to JIADA. JIDCO will support JIADA as technical agency.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan. Received (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the
cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(v) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC-ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
(vii) JIIDCO, Ranchi should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Jharkhand / JIIDCO, Ranchi.
Letter dated 16.02.19 received from Secretary (Industries), Government of Jharkhand cum Managing Director, Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA)
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA)
State : Jharkhand
District : Dhanbad
Industrial Estate : Development of Leather and Footwear Industrial Area
125
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
No
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area 30.00 acres
Area to be developed 30.00 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
112 units (100 no. of units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
NA
Performance of ID projects in State NA
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, the proposed site for leather & footwear Industrial Area is well connected with road, rail and air connectivity and is strategically placed to cater the needs of the Eastern India.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
34.07 acres of Govt. land in village –Gopalganj, Nirsa block, Dhanbad has been transferred to JIADA for industrial development. Hence, Non- agricultural conversion for industrial development is not required.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State Level Project Steering Committee (SLPSC) is functional and is headed by Director, Industries and Members as GM-DICs, Deputy Director (Industries), Joint Director (Industries), Cluster Directors, Director MSME-DI,
Constituted
126
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Ranchi and nominee from Planning and Finance Department to coordinate and monitor the progress.
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes, JIADA will meet the cost escalation cost of the project, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
Site Development & Compound Wall with fencing, roads and road side greenery & social forestry; water supply system with water storage tanks, pump houses, pumps and all required infrastructure; water harvesting; sewage system & treatment plant; electrical Infrastructure - Power Sub-station with electrical line from main station, distribution net-work including street light; storm water drainage; administrative office block; telecommunication system; conference hall/exhibition centre; bank/post office; first aid Centre, creche, canteen facility; pre-operative expenses & contingencies @ 5%, L-Cess @ 1%, GST @ 12% All above mentioned component are considered for calculating the project cost.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Particulars Before After Spinoff (Units) /Growth in cluster
30 112
Aggregate Investment by Cluster Firms (cr.)
24 100
Aggregate Production levels in the cluster (cr.)
90 280
Aggregate Business Turnovers of Cluster Firms (cr.)
108 350
Aggregate employment in the cluster (no.)
750 2500
Indirect investments expected to be triggered(no.)
45 150
Indirect employment expected to be triggered (no.)
1500 5000
Incremental average incomes spinoff anticipated (%)
20% 25%
--
Justification of the Proposal The Government of Jharkhand has focused leather and footwear sector (labour oriented sector) and announced one of the best policy for attracting
--
127
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
investment in the footwear sector. Footwear entrepreneurs have already started exploring opportunity for setting up of the manufacturing facility in the State. Few of them have already started their manufacturing unit and based on the demand, it is proposed to develop an industrial area for leather and footwear manufacturing industries. This project will give ready infrastructure to the investors for setting up their leather and footwear units.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
152.09 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 445.33 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 24.81 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
465.62 110.00
(v) Water harvesting 34.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage 178.02 60.00
(vii) Power (sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
875.14 250.00
(viii) Administrative office building 25.34 20.00
(ix) Telecommunication / Cyber centre/ Documentation centre
20.72 20.00
(x) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 33.26 30.00
(xi) Bank/Post office 39.49 20.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 81.57 40.00
(xiii) First aid centre, Crèche Canteen 34.43 20.00
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 186.98 80.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 149.15 20.00
(xvi) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 42.94 10.00
Cess @ 1% 26.4 -
GST@ 12% 316.77 -
Total 3132.06 1000.00
128
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-
CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 800.00*
(ii) State Government contribution 1166.03 1166.03
(iii) JIADA contribution 1166.03 1166.03
Total 3132.06 3132.06
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 800.00 lakh as 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.
1000.00 lakh.
6. Observations: (i) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
(ii) Roads in the proposed project should be constructed with Reinforced Cement Concrete
(RCC) in place of Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) as proposed by IA.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Industrial Estate at
Gopalganj Village, P.O. Nirsa, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand at a total project cost of Rs. 3132.06
lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 800.00 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 1166.03 lakh and
JIADA contribution of Rs. 1166.03lakh.
************
129
Agenda No. 51.4.2: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Industrial Estate at Barhe
Village, Chahno Block, Bijupara, Ranchi, Jharkhand.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide email dated 03.07.19, Jharkhand Industrial Infrastructure Development
Corporation (JIIDCO) Ltd., Ranchi submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land documents with clear title, signed by Competent Authority and complying with zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. in the name of Implementing Agency.
Vide e-mail dated 08.08.19, Govt. of Jharkhand informed that JIADA will be the implementing agency for the project and the grant-in-aid will be disbursed to JIADA. JIDCO will support JIADA as technical agency.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan. Received (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the
cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(v) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC-ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be.
Received
(vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines.
Received
(vii) JIIDCO, Ranchi should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Jharkhand / JIIDCO, Ranchi.
Letter dated 16.02.19 received from Secretary (Industries), Government of Jharkhand cum Managing Director, Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA)
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA)
State : Jharkhand
District : Ranchi
Industrial Estate : Pharmaceutical Park
130
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ area 35.08 acres
Area to be developed 23.90 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
54 units (29 no. of units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
NA
Performance of ID projects in State NA
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA)
Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority (JIADA)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received.
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Yes, the proposed location for the Pharmaceutical Park is well connected with road, rail and air connectivity and is strategically placed to cater to the needs of the Eastern India.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
50 acres of Govt. land in village –Barhe, Chanho block, Ranchi has been transferred to JIADA for industrial development. Hence, Non- agricultural conversion for industrial development is not required.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, State Level Steering Committee is functional and is headed by Director, Industries and Members as GM-DICs, Deputy Director (Industries), Joint Director (Industries), Cluster Directors, Director MSME-DI, Ranchi and nominee from
Constituted
131
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Planning and Finance Department to coordinate and monitor progress.
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Yes, JIADA will meet the cost escalation cost of the project, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
The cost of Administrative and Utility (Post Office & Bank) Building, Canteen, PCC Road, Main gate, Boundary wall, Sewerage system, sewerage Treatment Plant, Deep Boring, Recharging Pit, Drain, Electric Distribution System, Solid waste management, Street light, plantation, Effluent Treatment Plant (100 KLD), Water Supply System, Basic Site & Land Development and Levelling, Contingencies & Pre-Operative Expenses @ 5% & 3% respectively are taken into account for calculating the Project Cost.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
The development of new Industrial plots will create additional employment by setting up of new industries. The expected new employment generation from the Pharmaceutical Park is around 1300 and after 4-5 years of full operations the employment would reach upto 2000, similarly the indirect employment would be 3700 and after 4-5 years, it would reach to 5192. During the early years of construction, the total estimated investment in the park is to the tune of Rs. 247.00 crore and it may goes upto Rs. 370.00 crore once the project become fully operational.
--
Justification of the Proposal
Jharkhand has identified Pharmaceutical as a focus sector to attract the investors into the State. Best Incentives, Exemption and Concessions for Pharmaceutical units have been proposed in the Jharkhand Industrial promotion Policy 2016.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by
SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
552.29 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 273.36 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.48 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump 203.49 110.00
132
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by
SIDBI
houses
(v) Water harvesting 20.00 10.00
(vi) Drainage 85.84 60.00
(vii) Power (sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.), Generation of non-conventional energy
1167.79 250.00
(viii) Administrative office building 476.68 70.00
(ix) Telecommunication / Cyber centre/ Documentation centre
(x) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre
(xi) Bank/Post office 73.21 60.00
(xii) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets
(xiii) First aid centre, Crèche Canteen 142.52 20.00
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 204.50 80.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 258.70 20.00
(xvi) Other (Sanitary Conveniences) 25.62 10.00
Total 3494.48 1000.00
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 800.00*
(ii) State Government contribution 1347.24 1347.24
(iii) JIADA contribution 1347.24 1347.24
Total 3494.48 3494.48
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 800.00 lakh as 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.
1000.00 lakh.
6. Observations:
(i) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component Costs.
(ii) Roads in the proposed project should be constructed with Reinforced Cement Concrete
(RCC) in place of Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) as proposed by IA.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Industrial Estate at
Barhe Village, Chahno Block, Bijupara, Ranchi, Jharkhand at a total project cost of Rs. 3494.48
lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 800.00 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs. 1347.24 lakh and
JIADA contribution of Rs. 1347.24 lakh.
*********
133
Agenda No. 51.4.3: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Sirohi Road, Sirohi, Rajasthan.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 08.08.19, Government of Rajasthan submitted the following documents
and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
S. No. Documents required Status
(i) Confirmation from State Government regarding enhancement of their contribution towards the Project.
The project cost has been enhanced from Rs. 411.68 lakh to Rs. 518.87 lakh and State Government contribution has also been enhanced from Rs. 82.34 lakh (20% of Rs. 411.68 lakh) to Rs. 187.24 lakh (36.08% of Rs. 518.87 lakh).
(ii) SIDBI appraisal report. Received (iii) Copy of approved layout plan signed
by Competent Authority. Received
(iv) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency.
Received
(v) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost.
Received
(vi) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format to be provided by Office of DC (MSME).
Received
(vii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines.
Received
(viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.
Received
(ix) RIICO, Jaipur should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Rajasthan / RIICO, Jaipur.
As SIDBI appraisal report, construction of cement roads is necessary to withstand heavy loads. The project involves construction of cement concrete road of 1.89 km.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd.
State : Rajasthan
District : Sirohi
Industrial Estate : Industrial Area Sirohi Road
134
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 117.74 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 82.24 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed Size of plots (m) No. of plots 80x100 : 5 60x100 : 10 50x80 : 9 30x65 : 49 30x50 : 39 25x40 : 36 SP : 1
Total : 149
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
No ID project sanctioned in Sirohi District
Performance of ID projects in State Till date out of 19 ID projects, 15 projects have been completed.
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing
Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Rajasthan State Industrial
Development and Investment
Corporation Ltd
As per MSE-CDP
guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI
(Observations and
recommendations). Attach
SIDBI report
Submitted. Received
Whether sufficient facilities
available at site. (Proximity to
railway stations / state
highways, availability of water
supply, adequate power supply,
telecom facilities, dwelling
places of workers)
The Industrial Area is easily
accessible through all modes of
transport and is situated at a
distance of 2 kms from main NH-
62, nearest bus stand is at a distance
of about 1.5km from the Industrial
Area. Nearest Railway Station,
Pindwara is also situated at a
distance of about 3km and nearest
Airport, Udaipur is situated at a
--
135
Description Proposed by Implementing
Agency (IA)
Remarks
distance of 120 km.
Whether land is in possession
in the name of IA with Clear
Title
Yes Received
Whether Zoning regulations
and non-agricultural
conversion etc complied with)
Not applicable
Whether State Level
Committee to coordinate and
monitor progress has been
Constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received
form IA that it will meet the
cost in excess of approved
project cost and any escalation
in cost
Yes Received
Basis of elements of project
Cost
As per memorandum dated
10.02.2010 issued from the office
of DC MSME
As per SIDBI, the
estimates have been
prepared on the basis of
schedules of rates as per
PWD BSR 2016 for road
and BSR-2013 for
electrical work & PHED
BSR 2012 NH BSR
(amended)
Tangible Outcomes of the
project Better roads will reduce
congestion and lead time of
vehicles.
Increase in employment
opportunities with infrastructure
development.
Better infrastructure facilities
will bring in new investment
from people from Gujarat
which are keen to make new
investments in Sirohi.
The increase in manufacturing
activity in the region will
further result in increase in
support services, thereby
leading to overall all
development of the region.
--
136
Description Proposed by Implementing
Agency (IA)
Remarks
Justification of the Proposal The said industrial area was set up
during 1984-85 by RIICO and most
of the infrastructure facilities have
become obsolete. There is severe
need for up-gradation of
infrastructure in the area specially
the roads.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP
(i) Land development, levelling and boundary wall 96.18 96.18
(ii) Cost of laying roads 304.33 200.00
(iii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network including street light etc.)
118.36 118.36
Total 518.87 414.54
5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh)
S. No.
Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 331.63 331.63
(ii) RIICO contribution 187.24 187.24
Total 518.87 518.87
*SIBDI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 331.63 lakh as 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.
414.54 lakh.
6. Observations:
(i) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component Costs.
(ii) Roads in the proposed project should be constructed with Reinforced Cement Concrete.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Sirohi Road, Sirohi, Rajasthan at a total project cost of Rs. 518.87 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.
331.63 lakh and contribution from RIICO of Rs. 187.24 lakh.
********
137
Agenda Item No. 51.4.4: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Amritsar, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 05.02.19 & 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to
consider the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Fresh SIDBI appraisal report has been received after incorporating the revised (due to cement concrete) component-wise project cost and revised means of finance.
(ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent Authority.
Received
(iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.
Received
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
Undertaking received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with Cement Concrete in place of bituminous.
(vii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.
(iii) Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with AS&DC(MSME)
for finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to obtain final
approval on file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19,
66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on
08.07.19 under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of
components based on the actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate
138
and in the meeting, PSIEC requested the committee that they would like to reassess
the actual requirement of the components in consultation with the stakeholders and
submit the same to this Office along with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of
final approval.
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19
under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by
PSIEC and reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized
the eligible cost of components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to
obtain final approval from Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration
and final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Amritsar
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Focal Point Amritsar
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
184.04 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 184.04 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
460 plots with 115 operational units (out of which most of the units are micro).
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
N/A
Performance of ID projects in State Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.
139
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Amritsar is located close to NH-1 and is around 12 km from Amritsar Railway Station. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Amritsar was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC
received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment
--
140
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed during late 2002 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing:
108.88 100.00 - -
(ii) Cost of laying roads 489.40 200.00 289.00 289.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
9.86 9.86 - -
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
101.61 101.61 44.87 44.87
(v) Water harvesting 12.96 10.00 - -
(vi) Drainage 58.31 58.31 148.31 148.31
(vii) Power distribution, Street light arrangements, etc.
231.47 231.47 100.00 100.00
(viii) Administrative and Other Services Complex
46.22 20.00 - -
(ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation 20.00 20.00 - -
141
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
centre
(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 30.00 30.00 - -
(xi) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 - -
(xii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen 20.00 20.00 - -
(xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 80.00 400.00 400.00
(xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses @ 1.96% approx.
20.00 20.00 19.64 19.64
(xv) Other (Sanitary Convenience ) 10.25 10.00 - -
Total 1328.96 931.25 1001.82 1001.82
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 745.00 745.00* 800.00 800.00**
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 583.96 583.96 201.82 201.82
Total 1328.96 1328.96 1001.82 1001.82
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 745.00 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of
Rs.931.25 lakh.
** Maximum eligible GoI grant fixed upto Rs. 800.00 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved
project cost.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Amritsar, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1001.82 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.
800.00 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 201.82 lakh.
*****
142
Agenda Item No. 51.4.5: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC) Ltd.,
Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal
for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by
Competent Authority. Received
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.
Received
(v) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(vi) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh.
Request received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.
(vii) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.
(iii)Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with AS&DC(MSME) for
finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to obtain final approval on
file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19, 66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on 08.07.19 under
the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of components based on the
actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate and in the meeting, PSIEC
requested the committee that they would like to reassess the actual requirement of the
components in consultation with the stakeholders and submit the same to this Office along
with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of final approval.
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
143
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19 under the
Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by PSIEC and
reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized the eligible cost of
components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to obtain final approval from
Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration and
final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Tarn Taran
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Focal Point Goindwal Sahib
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
907.00 acres (Phase 1- 473 acres and Phase 2- 434 acres)
Area to be developed (acre) 825.00 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed
56 units (out of which 47 units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
N/A
Performance of ID projects in State Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory --
144
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
SIDBI report submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
Industrial area is located close to NH-54. Goindwal railway station is around 4 km away from Industrial Focal Point. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities such as roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Goindwal was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Received
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
State Government i.e. PSIEC had procured the land before the industrial area was developed.
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted
Yes, the Committee has been formed which includes officials from PSIEC, Industry Department, MSME-DI, Ludhiana
Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
The contribution will be made as per the means of finance mentioned in the report. State Govt. along with the other stakeholders will take care for any escalation in the project cost. Confirmation from PSIEC is mentioned in the covering letter.
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost PSIEC has informed that all the rates are in line with Punjab Common Schedule of Rates. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Up-gradation of Industrial area will provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear, better transport facilities, proper drainage system that will further lead to development of Industrial Estate.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed in late 1980s with all infrastructure
--
145
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project cost Revised Project cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
100.00 100.00 - -
(i) Cost of laying roads 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00
(ii) Road side greenery & social forestry
9.87 9.87 - -
(iii) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
107.80 107.80 132.80 132.80
(iv) Water harvesting 12.96 10.00 - -
(v) Drainage 59.11 59.11 32.36 32.36
(vi) Power (Up-gradation of street lights)
225.00 225.00 71.49 71.49
(vii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.25 10.00 - -
(viii) Telecommunication/Cyber/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00 - -
(ix) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 80.00 550.00 550.00
(x) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses (@2% approx.)
17.90 17.90 19.73 19.73
Total 912.89 839.68 1006.38 1006.38
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Earlier Project cost Revised Project cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed by
IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
146
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 671.74 671.74* 800.00 800.00**
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 241.15 241.15 206.38 206.38
Total 912.89 912.89 1006.38 1006.38
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 671.74 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
839.68 lakh.
**Maximum eligible GoI grant fixed upto Rs. 800.00 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(ii) Based on the request made by PSIEC, Competent Authority has given consent for laying
of Bituminous roads in place of Cement Concrete.
(iii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Goindwal Sahib, District Tarn Taran, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1006.38 lakh
with GoI assistance of Rs. 800.00 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 206.38 lakh.
*****
147
Agenda Item No. 51.4.6: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Pathankot, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18,
subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received. (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent
Authority Received.
(iii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iv) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received.
(v) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
As per SIDBI appraisal report, road will be laid with cement concrete.
(vi) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.
(iii) Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with
AS&DC(MSME) for finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to
obtain final approval on file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19,
66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on
08.07.19 under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of
components based on the actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate
and in the meeting, PSIEC requested the committee that they would like to reassess
the actual requirement of the components in consultation with the stakeholders and
submit the same to this Office along with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of
final approval.
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19
under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by
148
PSIEC and reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized
the eligible cost of components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to
obtain final approval from Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration
and final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation State : Punjab District : Pathankot Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Industrial Focal Point Pathankot
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
399.46 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 399.46 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed
370 plots with 16 units(out of which more than 50% units are micro)
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
Following two projects have been completed successfully: New Dhanchala of Jhans,Distt. Hoshiarpur and New MalaoutDistt. Muktsar. In both the cases, PSIEC was the Implementing Agency.
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Pathankot is located close to NH-44. Industrial units located in focal point are using ground water for their water requirements. Electricity is available through connection from Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL). The existing roads were developed by PSIEC at the time of allotment of plots. Amenities such as administrative office, banking facilities and public toilets are also available. The workers are from the
--
149
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
surrounding rural and urban areas. Whether land in possession is in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Pathankot was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed in 1990s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Further, due to deteriorated infrastructure, industries in the focal point are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are
--
150
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
also charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Currently, there are only 16 units in IndustrialFocal Point, Pathankot due to deteriorated condition of the focal point. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Earlier Project cost Revised Project cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
101.94 100.00 59.12 59.12
(ii) Cost of laying roads 201.14 200.00 201.14 201.14 (iii) Road side greenery & social
forestry 9.46 9.46 - -
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
109.98 109.98 109.98 109.98
(v) Water harvesting 8.48 8.48 - - (vi) Drainage/ Sewerage 59.96 59.96 59.96 59.96 (vii) Power (Sub-station,
Distribution Network, including Street light etc.) Generation of Non-Conventional Energy
207.25 207.25 150.00 150.00
(viii) Administrative and Other Services Complex
20.00 20.00 - -
(ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre
20.00 20.00 - -
(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre
30.00 30.00 - -
(xi) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 - - (xii) Raw material storage
facility, Marketing outlets 26.22 26.22 - -
(xiii) First aid centre, Creche Canteen facilities
20.00 20.00 - -
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities (Cost of improvement of existing STP)
150.00 80.00 400.00 400.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses @2%
20.00 20.00 19.60 19.60
(xvi) Others (Sanitary convenience )
10.25 10.00 - -
Total 1014.68 941.35 999.80 999.80
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
151
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project cost Revised Project cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under
MSE-CDP
753.08 753.08* 799.84 799.84**
(ii) Contribution from
PSIEC
261.60 261.60 199.96 199.96
Total 1014.68 1014.68 999.80 999.80
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 753.08 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of
Rs.941.35 lakh.
** 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs. 999.80 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Pathankot, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 999.80 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.
799.84 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 199.96 lakh.
*****
152
Agenda No. 51.4.7: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Chanalon, District SAS Nagar, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 48th
SCM held on 12.11.18
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 15.02.19 & 15.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
(PSIEC) Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider
the proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (ii) Registered land documents in the name of
Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.
Received
(iv) Details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(v) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
Undertaking received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with Cement Concrete in place of bituminous.
(vi) MSME-DI, Ludhiana should undertake visit to proposed ID Project along with representative of Government of Punjab (GM, DIC), Industries Associations and submit a Report justifying up-gradation in view of limited occupancy. The reason for low occupancy should also be reported.
Report submitted by MSME-DI, Ludhiana justifying upgradation in view of limited occupancy.
(iii) Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with AS&DC(MSME)
for finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to obtain final approval
on file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19,
66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on 08.07.19
under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of components based
on the actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate and in the meeting,
PSIEC requested the committee that they would like to reassess the actual requirement of
the components in consultation with the stakeholders and submit the same to this Office
along with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of final approval.
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
153
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19 under
the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by PSIEC
and reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized the eligible
cost of components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to obtain final
approval from Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration and
final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation State : Punjab District : S.A.S NAGAR
Industrial Estate : Upgradation of Industrial Focal Point Chanalon
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre)
150.48 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 150.48 acres
Number and sizes of plots developed 152 operational units (out of which 101 units are micro).
Implementing Period 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc.
N/A
Performance of ID projects in State Projects which were successfully completed under IID scheme are New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur, New Malaout Distt. Muktsar. In both the cases PSIEC was the implementing agency.
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report
Submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply,
The Focal Point, Chanalon is located besides NH-21. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads,
--
154
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Chanalon was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the proposal The focal point was developed during 1986 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and
--
155
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Comments of Cluster Division
other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh) S. No.
Items Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall and fencing
103.87 100.00 103.87 103.87
(ii) Cost of laying roads 480.62 200.00 480.62 480.62 (iii) Road side greenery & social
forestry 8.00 8.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses
115.76 110.00 153.80 153.80
(v) Water harvesting 8.00 8.00 -- -- (vi) Drainage 56.00 56.00 56.00 56.00 (vii) Power (Sub-station and
distribution network) 99.92 99.92 99.92 99.92
(viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.)
8.00 8.00 -- --
(ix) Administrative Office Building 21.52 20.00 -- --- (x) Cyber Centre/Documentation
centre/ Telecommunication 20.00 20.00 -- --
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre
20.00 20.00 -- --
(xii) Bank/Post office 20.00 20.00 -- -- (xiii) First aid centre, Creche
Canteen facilities 19.89 19.89 -- --
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities / Sewerage Treatment Plant
94.00 80.00 75.00 75.00
(xv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses
21.51 20.00 19.38 19.38
Total 1097.09 789.81 988.59 988.59
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
(iii) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 631.85 631.85* 790.87 790.87**
(iv) Contribution from PSIEC 465.24 465.24 197.72 197.72
Total 1097.09 1097.09 988.59 988.59
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 631.85 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
789.81 lakh.
** 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs. 988.59 lakh.
156
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Chanalon, District SAS Nagar, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 988.59 lakh with
GoI assistance of Rs. 790.87 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 197.72 lakh.
*****
157
Agenda No. 51.4.8: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point,
Kotkapura, District Faridkot, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of the requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC) Ltd.,
Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal
for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) Registered land documents with clear title in the name of Implementing Agency
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab along with copy of layout plan received.
(ii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (iv) Certificate from State Government for
compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. Received
(v) Status of Completed ID Projects in the State as per format provided and details of operating units in present project.
Received
(vi) Undertaking from State Government that more than 50% units are micro units.
As per the letter dated 15.10.18 by GM, DIC, Faridkot, there are 98 units, out of which, more than 50% are micro units whereas as per the details of industries operating in the Industrial Estate submitted by PSIEC vide letter dated 07.05.19 (verified by GM, DIC) and SIDBI appraisal report, 47 units are operating in the Industrial Estate.
(vii) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
The roads will be laid with cement concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4th revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001) as mentioned in Detailed project report and SIDBI appraisal report.
(iii) Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with AS&DC(MSME)
for finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to obtain final approval
on file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19,
66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on 08.07.19
under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of components
based on the actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate and in the
meeting, PSIEC requested the committee that they would like to reassess the actual
requirement of the components in consultation with the stakeholders and submit the
same to this Office along with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of final
approval.
158
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19 under
the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by PSIEC
and reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized the eligible
cost of components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to obtain final
approval from Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration
and final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation State : Punjab District : Faridkot Industrial Estate : Focal Point Kotkapura
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 53.25 acres Area to be developed (acre) 35.28 acres Number and sizes of plots developed 111 plots with 47 operational units.
Category of plots No. of plots
Area (in acres)
A:- Irregular plots 05 6.50 B:- ½ acres plots 10 5.80 C:- ¼ acres and above plots
16 22
4.56 4.78
D:- 500 sq. yards plots 32 2.97 “C” Type Plots C-12 to C-37 along with road allotted
26 6.05
Total 111 30.66
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about Proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA) Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report submitted Received
159
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Kotkapura is located close to NH-54. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Kotkapura was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with)
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted
Yes, constituted Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD) Received
Basis of elements of project Cost
The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during 1990s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
160
4. Proposed Project Cost:
S. No. Items Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
25.50 25.50 31.14 31.14
(ii) Cost of laying roads 165.00 165.00 169.87 169.87 (iii) Road side greenery & social
forestry 4.69 4.69 4.69 4.69
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
47.52 47.52 47.52 47.52
(v) Water harvesting 6.48 6.48 - - (vi) Drainage 5.68 5.68 5.68 5.68
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
248.20 248.20 248.20 248.20
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)
10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
(ix) Administrative office building 21.52 20.00 - - (x) Telecommunication/Cyber
Centre/ Documentation Centre 20.00 20.00 - -
(xi) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre
30.00 30.00 -- -
(xii) Bank/Post Office 20.00 20.00 - - (xiii) First Aid centre, crèche,
canteen facilities 19.89 19.89 - -
(xiv) Effluent Treatment Facilities 165.00 80.00 389.00 389.00 (xv) Contingencies and pre-
operative expenses@2% 15.79 15.79 18.12 18.12
Total 805.27 718.75 924.22 924.22
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed by
IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
(v) GoI Grant under MSE-
CDP
575.00 575.00* 739.38 739.38**
(vi) Contribution from PSIEC 230.27 230.27 184.84 184.84
Total 805.27 805.27 924.22 924.22
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 575.00 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 718.75 lakh
** 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs. 924.22 lakh.
161
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Kotkapura, District Faridkot, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 924.22 lakh with GoI
assistance of Rs. 739.38 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 184.84 lakh.
*****
162
Agenda Item No. 51.4.9: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19, subject
to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19, Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval.
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in
the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC, Notification of land from Government of Punjab and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
Request received from PSIEC to consider laying of road with bituminous in place of Cement Concrete.
(iii) Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with AS&DC(MSME)
for finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to obtain final approval
on file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19,
66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on 08.07.19
under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of components
based on the actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate and in the
meeting, PSIEC requested the committee that they would like to reassess the actual
requirement of the components in consultation with the stakeholders and submit the
same to this Office along with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of final
approval.
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19 under
the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by PSIEC
and reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized the eligible
cost of components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to obtain final
approval from Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration
and final approval.
Details of the proposal are as under:
163
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation State : Punjab District : Hoshiarpur Industrial Estate : Focal Point Hoshiarpur
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan
Yes
Total Area of Industrial Estate/ Area (acre)
82 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 82 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed
124 plots with 75 operational units (out of which more than 50% units are micro).
Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.
New Dhanchala of Jhans, Distt. Hoshiarpur
Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency
(IA) Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Report submitted Received
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Hoshiarpur is located close to NH-103A. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Hoshiarpur was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted :
Yes, constituted Constituted
164
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost :
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost :
The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project
Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve the occupancy of Focal Point.
--
Justification of the Proposal The focal point was developed during late 1970s with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
S. No. Items Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
16.06
16.06 40.91 40.91
165
S. No. Items Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(ii) Cost of laying roads 237.77 200.00 237.77 237.77
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry
13.02 10.00 - -
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
56.51 56.51 56.51 56.51
(v) Drainage 49.60 49.60 49.60 49.60
(vi) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
220.47 220.47 80.25 80.25
(vii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.)
10.25 10.00 - -
(viii) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre
14.28 14.28 - -
(ix) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
33.41 33.41 - -
(x) Effluent Treatment Facilities
0.00 0.00 475.00 475.00
(xi) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
13.02 13.02 18.80 18.80
Total 664.39 623.35 958.84 958.84
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 498.68 498.68* 767.07 767.07**
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 165.71 165.71 191.77 191.77
Total 664.39 664.39 958.84 958.84
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 498.68 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost of Rs. 623.35
lakh.
** 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs. 958.84 lakh.
166
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, District Hoshiarpur, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 958.84 lakh with GoI
assistance of Rs. 767.07 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 191.77 lakh.
*****
167
Agenda Item No. 51.4.10: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate
at Focal Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab.
Background
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during 49th
SCM held on 27.02.19,
subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.
(ii) Vide letter dated 30.05.19; Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (PSIEC)
Ltd., Chandigarh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the
proposal for final approval:
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (ii) Registered land documents with clear title, in
the name of Implementing Agency Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC and Jamabandi in English have been received in this regard.
(iii) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format provided and details of Industries operating in the Industrial Estate.
Received
(iv) PSIEC, Chandigarh should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Punjab/ PSIEC, Chandigarh
As per SIBDI, the internal roads will be laid with concrete, laying of roads have been designed as per standards stipulated in MoRTH specifications (4
th
revision and guidelines of IRC 37-2001).
(iii) Proposal was discussed in the 50th
SCM held on 02.07.19 and Committee decided that
officials from Government of Punjab/ PSIEC to have a meeting with AS&DC(MSME)
for finalization of eligible cost of components and GoI grant and to obtain final
approval on file.
(iv) As per the decision taken by Steering Committee in its 50th
Meeting held on 02.07.19,
66th
Meeting of Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) was held on 08.07.19
under the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME) to deliberate the cost of components
based on the actual requirement, in respect of the said Industrial Estate and in the
meeting, PSIEC requested the committee that they would like to reassess the actual
requirement of the components in consultation with the stakeholders and submit the
same to this Office along with SIDBI appraisal reports for consideration of final
approval.
(v) Vide letter dated 25.07.19, PSIEC has forwarded the revised DPR along with SIDBI
appraisal report based on their actual requirement of the components.
(vi) The proposal was again discussed in the 67th
Meeting of TEAC held on 09.08.19 under
the Chairmanship of AS& DC (MSME). As the proposal had been re-casted by PSIEC
and reappraised by SIDBI as per scheme guidelines and committee finalized the
eligible cost of components and GoI grant and recommended the proposal to obtain
final approval from Secretary, MSME on file.
(vii) Based on the directions of Secretary, MSME, the proposal is placed for consideration
and final approval.
168
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Pre-registration Information
Name of Organization : Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation
State : Punjab
District : Nawanshahr
Industrial Estate : Focal Point Nawanshahr
2. Basic Information about Proposal:
Particulars Description
Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan :
Yes
Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre):
50.70 acres
Area to be developed (acre) 34.73 acres
Number and sizes of plots to be developed :
116 plots with 34 operational units (out of which 28 units are micro). Details of plots: Category of plots No. of plots 1½ acres plots 1 1 acres plots 3 ¾ acres plots 5 ½ acres plots 14 3 Kanal plots 15 ¼ acres plots 26 500 sq. yards plots 52
Total 116
Implementing Period : 24 months
Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.:
Nil
Performance of ID projects in State: Satisfactory
3. Details about proposal:
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Implementing Agency (IA): Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation (a Government of Punjab undertaking)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines
Track Record of the IA Satisfactory. --
Appraisal by SIDBI (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.
Submitted Received
169
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
Whether sufficient facilities available at site. (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers)
The Focal Point, Nawanshahr is well connected to NH-18 & NH-103A. Nawanshahr Railway Station is present in Industrial focal point, which is 4.2 kms away. Being an existing industrial area, basic infrastructure facilities viz. roads, power, water supply and telecom facilities are available.
--
Whether land is in possession in the name of IA with Clear Title
Punjab Small Scale Industries & Export Corporation Ltd. (PSIEC) was the original owner of the land. When the focal point Batala was developed, the entire land was allotted to the unit holders present in the focal point. PSIEC is still responsible for operation and maintenance of focal point.
Undertaking from PSIEC that land is in possession of PSIEC received.
Whether Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with):
Project is about upgradation of Industrial Focal Point
--
Whether State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted:
Yes Constituted
Whether confirmation received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost:
Mentioned in Cover letter (Signed by MD)
Received
Basis of elements of project Cost: The cost and specifications have been given in the DPR. The cost estimates have been signed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer of PSIEC.
--
Tangible Outcomes of the project: Better roads will improve connectivity/ accessibility to Industrial Focal Point.
Proper usage of water will have a positive impact on the environment and thus improve the access to water supply.
With the upgradation of basic infrastructure, employment opportunities (direct & indirect) will increase.
The increase in manufacturing activity in the region will further result in ignition of support services, thereby leading to the overall development in the region.
Increased investments due to development of the infrastructure will also improve
--
170
Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA)
Remarks
the occupancy of Focal Point.
Justification of the Proposal: The focal point was developed during 1978 with all infrastructure facilities required for upgradation. However, with time basic infrastructures in the focal point has been deteriorated and require upgradation. The proposal will cater to the basic need of maintenance of road, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. Upgradation of Industrial focal Point will help in attracting the more and more investors/unit holders to establish their units.
--
4. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
(i) Cost of land filling / leveling including boundary wall/ fencing
28.50
28.50
28.50 28.50
(ii) Cost of laying roads 205.92 200.00 206.95 206.95
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 4.43 4.43 4.43 4.43
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and pump houses
113.34 110.00 113.34 113.34
(v) Drainage 28.83 28.83 28.83 28.83
(vi) Power (Sub-station and distribution network, including street lighting etc., Generation of non-conventional energy)
193.13 193.13 193.13 193.13
(vii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.25 10.00 10.25 10.25
(viii) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre 14.28 14.28 25.00 25.00
(ix) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets
33.41 33.41 - -
(x) Effluent Treatment Facilities 150.00 80.00 300.00 300.00
(xi) Contingencies and pre-operative expenses
15.64 15.64 18.21 18.21
Total 797.73 718.22 928.64 928.64
171
5. Proposed means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Earlier Project Cost Revised Project Cost
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
Proposed
by IA
As per MSE-
CDP/
Recommended
by SIDBI
(i) GoI Grant under MSE-
CDP
574.58 574.58* 742.91 742.91**
(ii) Contribution from PSIEC 223.15 223.15 185.73 185.73
Total 797.73 797.73 928.64 928.64
*SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 574.58 lakh as 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs.
718.22 lakh.
** 80% of total eligible Project cost of Rs. 928.64 lakh.
6. Observations:
Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval:
(i) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the
approved project cost.
(ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component
Costs.
7. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Nawanshahr, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 928.64 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.
742.91 lakh and contribution from PSIEC of Rs. 185.73 lakh.
*****
172
Agenda No. 51.4.11: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Apparel Cluster, Tirupur, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu.
Background:
Proposal accorded In-principle approval during the 44th
SCM held on 05.09.17, subject to
submission of following documents prior to Final approval.
Vide letter dated 02.08.19, TANSIDCO, Chennai has submitted the above documents except
Tangible Outcomes at serial No. (ii) and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Basic Information of Cluster
Name of Cluster : Apparel Cluster
District : Thiruvarur
Location of Cluster : Tirupur
Lok Sabha Constituency : Pollachi, Tiruppur
Main Product : Cotton T Shirts, Vests, Bady’s garments, men’s / boy’s shirts etc.
No. of Enterprises including break up (Micro, Small, Medium) :
Micro 2250 Small 1330
Medium 350 Total 3930
Turnover for the last five years :
Year Amount Rs. in Cr
2010-11 17504 2011-12 19449 2012-13 21610 2013-14 24012 2014-15 26680
Exports for the last five years :
Year Amount Rs. in Cr
2010-11 13122 2011-12 14580 2012-13 16200 2013-14 18000 2014-15 20000
Employment in Cluster: 20000 Nos.
Technology Details : Training equipments
Documents required Status
(i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Provided
(ii) Tangible outcomes like- number of units, turnover, employment etc. Required
(iii) Registered lease deed of premises on the name of SPV. Provided
(iv) Letter required from Bank for in-principle for grant of working capital
loan.
Provided
(v) Bank document. provided
173
1. Nano transfer (Label/sticker) printing machine (with dryer)/ yoke transfer label. 2. Carusel (round) type textile screen printing machines. 3. Digital sublimation printer. 4. Direct to panel/ garment printer. 5. Glass table (with drier). 6. Jacquard twill tape or elastic weaving machine. 7. Wash care label printing machine. Value added facilities 1. Oval automatic screen printing equipments. 2. Embroidery machine. 3. Direct to Fabric digital printing machine. Testing Facility 1.Colour matching &cabinet. 2.Crockmeter. 3.GSM Cutter. 4.Laundrometer. 5.Spectrophotometer.
Whether DS Conducted : Yes
Main findings of DSR : The diagnostic study recommended the establishment of a CFC.
Main Problems of Cluster: Market and product development. Social infrastructure. Lack of Manpower skills. Input access. Production and quality. Market and market development. Linkage with FIs.
2. Information about Proposed CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Justification for CFC
To have facilities like training and testing facilities particularly in the area of printing, weaving and labelling facility.
--
(b.) Location of CFC Veerapandi Village, Tiruppur Taluk, Tirupur Dist. --
Percentage of units in radius of 5 km
9,700 --
Percentage of units in radius of 10 km
18,600 --
(c.) Land for CFC
i. Whether land acquired
Land is on lease in the name of SPV Received.
ii. Title is in name of TTPK Apparel Cluster Pvt. Ltd. --
iii. Valuation and its basis
Land - 16 year --
iv. Land is sufficient The land is sufficient for the envisaged CFC --
v. Change of land use The CLU is in process --
vi. If on lease, duration of lease
16 year --
vii Whether lease is legally tenable
Yes, lease is legally tenable. --
174
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(d.) Total Building area(sq ft)
45000 sft. --
(e.) Rate of construction of building
Rs. 500/sft --
(f.) Main Facility Proposed
Training: Nano transfer (label/sticker) printing machine
(with dryer)/Yoke transfer label, Carousel (round) type textile screen printing machines.
Digital sublimation printer, Direct to Panel/Garment Printer.
Glass Table (with drier), Jacquard twill tape or elastic weaving machine.
Wash care label printing machine Value added facilities: Advanced oval automatic screen printing
equipment, Embroidery machine, Direct to Fabric digital printing machine.
Rapier Label loom Testing: Colour matching & cabinet, Crockmeter, GSM
Cutter, Laundrometer, Spectrophotometer
--
(g.) Prod capacity of CFC
1. With the establishment of CFC units could graduate from USD 3 (FOB) value products to USD 5-6 (FOB) value products. 2. CFC could help cluster firs even double turnover through producing higher producing higher value products. Capacity utilization may increase by at least 50 percent.
--
(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export /domestic sales and direct/indirect employment, etc.)
Profit margins may double from 5-10 percent. Units could graduate from USD 3 (FOB) value products to USD 5-6 (FOB) products.
The CFC will also enable increase in employment by at least about 3000 persons directly; train manpower to the tune of at least 3500 persons in 5 years.
There is an expected turnover rise to Rs. 44635 crore during 2018-19 from the existing turnover of Rs. 26680 crore for the period 2014-15.
Presently, about 80 per cent of output is export oriented. This could increase to even 85 per cent.
Tangible outcomes like units, turnover, employment etc. is required.
(i.) Pollution clearance required or not
Not required. Requisite Document from PCB is required
(j.) Man Power in CFC Training Facility A. Training In-charge -1No B. Instructor cum Supervisor-4 Nos C. Junior Instructors-5 Nos D. Operators(Experienced trainees-Stipend)-36 Nos E. Helpers(Fresh trainees-Stipend)-63 Nos Value Adding Facility A.Operators-10 Nos B.Helpers-22 Nos Testing Lab Facility
--
175
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
A. Lab Technician-1 No.
(k.) Revenue generation mechanism for sustainability of assets (service/ user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)
Training Facility - Training Facility - Job working Value Addition Facility - Job working
--
3. Information about SPV
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Name and Address TTPK Apparel Cluster Private Limited - Tiruppur
--
(b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society or Trust)
Company - Pvt. Ltd. --
(c.) Name of the state Govt. and MSME officials in SPV
The provision has been included in MoA & AoA. The name will be finalised after Final Approval
--
(d.) Date of formation of SPV
23.09.15 --
(e.) Number of Members 28 nos. --
(f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA submitted
Provided --
(g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 320 lakh --
(h.) Paid up capital Rs. 50 lakh --
(i.) Shareholding Pattern Provided --
(j.) Commitment letter for contribution
The SPV has provided the commitment letters Required
(k.) SPV specific A/c Syndicate Bank --
(l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation
SPV members who include key office bearers of some related industry associations have already taken the lead to pursue several joint and co-operative initiatives.
The major initiatives may be visualiased in terms of: Pursuing initiatives in close co-ordination
with the MSME-DI to facilitate networking with institutions to facilitate marketing in the short-to-medium term, organizing fairs in distant domestic marketsand organizing vendor development / sub-contraction programmes in Tiruppur.
Exposure visits to successful clusters in Tamil Nadu machinery fairs and to units in others locations, organizing bankers interface and enabling loans to firms with CGTMSE cover.
Spearheading various programmes and seminars related to industry needs including lean manufacturing seminars,
--
176
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
BDS on lean has also been catalysed. Securing land for upgrading plans.
(m.) Technical Institution Not provided in the DPR --
(n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.
--- Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed capacity is required.
(o.)
(a) Power requirement for commercial/domestic purpose
500 kVA. Please refer to Annexure XIV of the DPR
--
(b) Water 7000 ltrs per day --
(c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Please refer to Table - 18 of the DPR --
4. Implement Arrangements
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) Implementing Agency
Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO)
As per MSE-CDP guidelines.
(b.) Fund receiving Agency
Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited (TANSIDCO)
(c.) Implementation Period
24 months as per MSE-CDP Guidelines
(d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Recommendations
The appraisal of DPR is yet to be pending (SIDBI) SIDBI appraisal report received.
(e.) Comments of Technical Division
The issues raised by Technical Division were on repetition of machines of various sizes in training section as well as in the Value addition section.
Recommended the proposal.
(f.) Approval of Technical Committee
(i) Based on justification provided by SPV members, the technical division agreed for inclusion of machines as proposed for the training section, CFC members agreed to enhance their contribution so that value of machine of value addition section can be covered from SPV contribution, Which was agreed by Technical Division. (ii) SPV members were advised to revise the DPR accordingly by covering all the above aspects including enhanced contribution from Rs 301.81 lakh to 416.81 lakh and submit the revised DPR to this office through State Government
Recommended the proposal.
(g.) Working capital(In-principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)
Furnished. Please refer to Annexure IX of the DPR --
177
5. Financial Analysis of CFC
Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments by Cluster Division
(a.) BEP 26 % --
(b.) IRR, Payback period
23.24, 3 year 8 months --
(c.) DSCR Not Applicable (non-availment of term loan in this project).
--
(d.) Return on Capital employed (ROCE)
26.13% --
(e.) NPV NPV is positive and high (Rs.962.29 lakh) at a conservative project life of 10 years
--
(f.) DER Nil --
(g.) Sensitivity Analysis ROCE - 23.80, NPV - 739.78, IRR - 20.39, BEP - 28%
--
(h.) Status of CFCs approved in the State
Related data has been submitted by TANSIDCO/MSME DI
--
6. Proposed project cost of the CFC is as follow:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1 Land and its Development 15.00 15.00 15.00
2 Building and other Civil Constructions 225.00 284.11 284.11
3 Plant & Machinery (including electrification)
1195.37 1195.37 1195.37
4 Misc. fixed assets 20.00 20.00 20.00
5 Preliminary expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
16.00 16.00 16.00
6 Pre-operative expenses, maximum 2% of project cost
14.00 14.00 14.00
7 Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and machinery)
65.00 63.97 63.97
8 Margin money for Working Capital 6.57 16.55 16.55
Total Project Cost 1556.94 1625.00 1625.00
7. Proposed Means of Finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No.
Particulars Proposed by IA
Recommended by SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1040.13 856.94 856.94
2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 100.00 300.00 300.00
3 SPV contribution 416.81 468.06 468.06
Total 1556.94 1625.00 1625.00
178
8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)
(Rs. in lakh) S. No
Name of Machine Specifications Amount per Machine
Qty. Total Amount
1 Nano transfer (label/sticker) printing machine (with dryer)/ Yoke transfer label
Print area of 22X 28 inches capacity of 600 T shirts feeding per hour.
5.50 1 5.50
2 Carousel (round) type textile screen printing machines
10 color X 12 pallets with print area of 50 cmsX 60 cms. (or 20” x 28”)
40.00 2 80.00
3 Carousel (round) type textile screen printing machine
12 color X 14 pallets with print area of 50 cms X 60 cms
49.25 3 147.75
4 Digital sublimation printer/sublimation transfer printing machine
Max print width of 64”; production speed of about 225 of sq.mts per hour
12.00 2 24.00
5 Digital sublimation printer/sublimation transfer printing machine
Max print width of 44”; production speed of about 225 of sq.mts per hour
5.50 2 11.00
6 Direct to garment/ digital chest printer
5 colour – Maximum resolution of 2880 dpi; Printout area of 24” x 42”
26.00 1 26.00
7 Glass table (with auto moving drier)
2 automatic print head; Printing area of 70 x 100 cms; table length 105 ft x 60 inch
12.50 4 50.00
8 Jacquard twill tape weaving machine
6 heads with 50 mm reed width; 384 jac. hooks
25.00 1 25.00
9 Wash care label printing machine
3 colour +1 background 10.00 1 10.00
Sub- Total 379.25
Value added product development facility 1 Oval automatic screen
printing machine with Flock attachment
18 Colour and 40 pallet/station; with print area of 70|x 100 cm
220.00 1 220.00
2 Embroidery machine 12 colour; 15 heads; area of 850x550x230
91.00 1 91.00
3 Digital printing machine (direct to fabric)
72” width of print job/fabric; 8 colours; 8 print heads
120.00 1 120.00
4 Repair label machine Working width 120 cms; 6 segments; speed of 650 rpm with electronic jacquard; 12 colours; one- white base and second with black base
115.00 2 230.00
Sub-Total 661.00 Testing Lab Equipments 1 Colour matching
cabinet, crockmeter, GSM Cutter, Electronic balance,, grey scales, laundrometer, rotary shaker PH meter, TDS meter, washing machine, Template
-- 1.30 10 13.00
179
S. No
Name of Machine Specifications Amount per Machine
Qty. Total Amount
2 CETP 1000 litres/hour 11.50 1 11.50 3 Compressor 138 cfm 17.00 1 17.00 4
A.C 1.5 tons 0.30 9 17.00
5 Transformer
1 MW 15.00 1 15.00
6 Computer, Printer and EPABX
Assorted 3.00 set 3.00
DG set 250 kVA + kVA 18.00 2 36.00 Sub-total of machine cost 1138.4
5 Electrification and installation expenses @ 5% of P&M cost (viz 5% of Sr.
No. 21) 56.92
Total 1195.37
9. Observations:
Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:
(i) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60% of installed
capacity.
(ii) NOC from Pollution Control Board.
(iii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution.
(iv) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation cost, if any,
over and above the approved project cost.
(v) Documents regarding registration of all the units in MSME Data Bank.
(vi) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export, employment etc. in the
format provided.
10. Proposal for Steering Committee:
Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting of Common Facility Centre
(CFC) in Apparel Cluster, Tirupur, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu at a total project cost of Rs.1625.00 lakh
with Gol assistance of Rs.856.94 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs.300.00 lakh and SPV
contribution of Rs.468.06 lakh.
***********
180
Agenda No.50.5.1: Ratification for Replacement of Machinery for setting up of Common
Facility Centre (CFC) in Footwear Cluster, Bahadurgarh, Haryana
S. No. Description Status
1 Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of CFC in Footwear Cluster, Bahadurgarh,
Haryana
2 Approval accorded 29th
SCM of MSE-CDP held on 24.02.12 , later on file
3 Final approval order
issued on
03.12.12
4 Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP)
5 Means of Finance Rs. in lakh
GoI contribution : 916.68
State Government contribution : 150.00
SPV contribution : 443.14
Total : 1509.82
6 Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its development : 250.00
(ii) Building & Other Civil construction : 239.38
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including 5%
electrification charges)
: 906.94
(iv) Misc. fixed assets : 25.00
(v) Preliminary & pre-operative
expenses, maximum 2% of project
cost
: 30.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5%
on plant and machinery)
: 50.14
(vii) Margin money for working capital : 8.36
Total : 1509.82
7 Total GoI grant
released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 09.01.17 : Rs. 366.67
2nd
on 13.03.18 & 10.04.18 : Rs. 275.00
Total : Rs. 641.67
8 Validity upto 31.05.18
9 Time extension
accorded on file up to
--
10 Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify approval for
replacement of machinery accorded on file.
**********
181
Agenda No. 51.5.2: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Utopia
Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the
proposal and
location
Setting up of CFC in Utopia Cashew Cluster, Kumta, Uttara
Kannada, Karnataka.
2. Approval accorded 43rd
SCM held on 09.03.17.
3. Final approval order
issued on
31.03.17.
4. Name of the IA Karnataka Council for Technological Upgradation (KCTU),
Bangalore.
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1079.05
Govt. of Karnataka Grant : 147.00
SPV contribution : 235.00
Total : 1461.05
6. Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its Development 75.20
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 305.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including
electrification).
995.00
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost
5.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on
plant and machinery)
55.85
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 15.00
Total 1461.05
7. Total GoI grant
released
(Rs. in lakh)
1st installment on 29.06.18 431.62
2nd
installment on 08.01.19 323.00
8. Validity upto 30.03.19
9. Time extension
accorded on file up
to
31.10.19
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*********
182
Agenda No. 51.5.3: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Rice Mill
Cluster, Ramtek, Nagpur, Maharashtra.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal
and location
Setting up of CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Ramtek, Nagpur
2. Approval accorded 43rd
SCM held on 09.03.17
3. Final approval order
issued on
13.04.17
4. Name of the IA Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC),
Mumbai
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 1125.00
Govt. of Maharashtra Grant : 147.67
SPV contribution : 552.34
Total : 1825.01
1825.00
(say rounded off)
6. Project Costs and
component wise details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Land and its Development 108.30
(ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 240.00
(iii) Plant & Machinery (including
electrification)
1347.12
(iv) Misc. fixed assets 25.00
(v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses,
maximum 2% of project cost
25.00
(vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on
plant and machinery)
73.15
(vii) Margin money for Working Capital 6.44
Total Project Cost 1825.01
7. Total GoI grant
released Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh)
1st on 24.05.18 : 450.00
2nd
on 10.04.19 : 337.50
2nd
on 08.08.19 : 225.00
Total : 1012.50
8. Validity upto 12.04.19
9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.10.19
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*****
183
Agenda No. 51.5.4: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in
Pharmaceutical Cluster, Cuttack, Odisha.
S.
No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal and Location
Setting up of CFC in Pharmaceutical Cluster, Cuttack, Odisha.
2. Approval accorded 40th
SCM held on 23.06.16 3. Final approval order
issued on 19.10.16
4. Name of the Implementing Agency
Odisha Small Industries Corporation Limited (OSIC), Cuttack
5. Means of Finance
(Rs. in lakh) Grant from Govt. of India : 197.70 Grant from Govt. of Odisha : 60.00 SPV contribution : 35.00 Total : 292.70
6. Project Cost and component-wise details
(Rs. in lakh) i) Land & site Development 12.68
ii) Building 30.44
iii) Plant & Machinery 209.20
iv) Misc. Fixed Asset 19.88
v) Preliminary & pre-operative expenses
4.77
vi) Contingency for plant & machinery 10.46
vii) Margin money for working capital 5.27
Total 292.70
7. Total GoI grant released
Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) 1
st on 07.08.18 : 79.08
2nd
on 09.08.19 : 59.31 Total : 138.39
8. Validity upto 31.03.19 9. Time extension
accorded on file upto 31.03.20
10. Proposal for Steering Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension accorded on file.
*******
184
Agenda No. 51.5.5: Ratification for Final approval of up-gradation of Industrial Estate at
Focal Point, Batala, District Gurdaspur.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal
and location
Up-gradation of Industrial Focal Point at Batala, District
Gurdaspur, Punjab
2. Approval accorded Recommended by 66th
TEAC held on 08.07.19 and later
approved on file.
3. Final approval order
issued on
--
4. Name of the IA Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation (PSIEC),
Chandigarh
5. Means of Finance
*80% of total project cost of Rs. 831.46 lakh.
Rs. in lakh
GoI contribution : 665.17*
PSIEC contribution : 166.29
Total : 831.46
6. Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
(i) Cost of land filling / levelling
including boundary wall/ fencing
: 47.76
(ii) Cost of laying roads : 252.45
(iii) Road side greenery & social
forestry
: 10.84
(iv) Water supply including overhead
tanks and pump houses
: 94.18
(v) Water harvesting : 6.48
(vi) Drainage : 34.90
(vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution
network, including street lighting
etc., Generation of non-
conventional energy)
: 229.00
(viii) Other (Sanitary conveniences etc.) : 10.25
(ix) Administrative office building : 20.00
(x) Conference Hall/Exhibition Centre : 29.30
(xi) Contingencies and pre-operative
expenses
: 16.30
(xii) Effluent Treatment Facilities : 80.00
Total : 831.46
7. Total GoI grant
released
Nil
8. Validity upto --
9. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the final
approval accorded on file.
******
185
Agenda No. 51.5.6: Ratification for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate
at Ravalkole (V), Malkajgiri District, Telangana.
Background:
(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 44th
SCM held on 05.09.17.
(ii) The proposal was placed before Steering Committee in its 50th meeting held on 02.07.19
for Final Approval, wherein Committee differed the proposal with following decisions:
(a) State Government to clarify regarding their contribution and that of allotted
entrepreneurs.
(b) GoI grant would be decided after receiving clarification from Government of
Telangana.
(iii) Based on the directions of Steering Committee, Govt. of Telangana/IA, vide our letter
dated 24.07.19, was requested to furnish the clarifications. The response from Govt. of
Telangana/IA vis-à-vis our request are tabulated as given below:
S.No. Clarifications sought by this Office Reply given by TSIIC, Hyderabad
(i) Who will be responsible for maintaining the Industrial Estate, once it is developed and handed over to Industry Association (M/s Geethanagar Navajeevan Nagar Micro Industrial Association).
Local Body i.e. Gram Panchayat and the Industrial Association would be responsible for maintaining the Industrial Estate.
(ii) Government of Telangana/TSIIC (IA’s) contribution towards project cost (excluding land conversion charges Rs. 82.42 lakh, which is not part of project cost).
Vide letter dated 03.07.19 Government of Telangana informed that they would contribute 20% of the total project cost as its share.
(iii) Contribution of allottee units towards project cost.
The Association will contribute an amount of Rs. 50.00 lakh and also give undertaking that in case of any escalation, they will bear the escalation cost over and above the approved project cost.
Details of the proposal are as under:
1. Proposed Project Cost:
(Rs. in lakh)
S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure
(i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary wall /fencing:
184.43 100.00 100.00
(ii) Cost of laying roads 211.12 200.00 200.00
(iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 10.00
(iv) Water supply including overhead tanks,
and pump houses
88.51 88.51 88.51
(v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 10.00
186
S.No. Particulars Proposed by IA
As per SIDBI
As per MSE-CDP
(vi) Drainage 87.01 60.00 60.00
(vii) Power (sub-station and distribution net-
work including street light etc),
generation of non-conventional energy
271.00 250.00 250.00
(viii) Others (sanitary conveniences etc.) 11.38 10.00 10.00
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative Office Building 153.12 20.00 20.00
(ii) Telecommunication / Cyber Centre /
Documentation Centre
20.00 20.00
(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Centre 30.00 30.00
(iv) Bank / Post Office 20.00 20.00
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets.
40.00 40.00
(vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen
Facilities.
20.00 20.00
3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 10.00 10.00 10.00
Total 1036.57 888.51 888.51
2. Based on the clarifications received from State Govt./ IA, Secretary, MSME /Chairman of
the Steering Committee approved the means of finance on file as given below:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Percentage
Approved
Amount
(i) GoI grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 68.57 710.80 *
(ii) State Govt./TSIIC contribution 236.57 26.60 275.77
(iii) Industry Association contribution 0.00 4.83 50.00
Total 1036.57 100.00 1036.57
*80% of the eligible project cost of Rs.888.51lakh.
3. Observations:
(i) Compliance of terms and conditions as mentioned in SIDBI Appraisal Report.
(ii) TSIIC should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper
drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time.
The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Telangana.
187
4. Proposal for Steering Committee:
The proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Ravalkole (V), Malkajgiri
District, Telangana, at a total project of Rs. 1036.57 lakh with GoI grant of Rs.710.80 lakh, State
Govt./TSIIC contribution of Rs. 275.77 lakh and Industry Association contribution of Rs. 50.00 lakh has
been approved by Secretary, MSME on file.
Steering Committee may kindly ratify.
*****
188
Agenda No. 51.5.7: Ratification for Time Extension granted for setting up of new Industrial
Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal,
Medak District, Telangana.
S. No. Description Status
1. Name of the proposal
and location
New Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster
Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District, Telangana.
2. Approval accorded 32nd
SCM held on 20.03.13.
3. Final approval order
issued on
21.03.14.
4. Name of the IA Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC),
Hyderabad.
5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh)
Govt. of India Grant : 752.65
Govt. of Telangana Grant : 188.17
Total : 940.82
6. Project Costs and
component wise
details
(Rs. in lakh)
S.
No.
Particulars Approved
Cost
1. Land Development and other overhead
Infrastructure
i) Cost of land filling/ levelling including
boundary wall and fencing
100.00
ii) Cost of laying roads 145.00
iii) Landscaping / Road side greenery/ Social
forestry
10.00
iv) Water supply including overhead tanks
and pump house
110.00
v) Water harvesting 10.00
vi) Drainage 60.00
vii) Power (Sub-station and distribution
network work including street light etc.),
Generation of non-conventional energy
250.00
viii) Other (sanitary conveniences etc.) 10.00
2. Administrative and Other Services Complex
(i) Administrative office building 149.11
(ii) Tele-communication / Cyber
centre/Documentation centre
(iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition centre
(iv) Bank / Post office
(v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing
outlets
(vi) First aid centre, Creche, Canteen
3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 78.26
4. Contingencies & Pre-operative exp. 18.45
Total 940.82
189
7. Total GoI grant
released
(Rs. in lakh)
1st installment on 28.09.14 62.88
2nd
installment on 15.12.17 200.00
3rd
installment on 23.07.19 400.00
8. Validity upto 31.12.18
9. Time extension
accorded on file up to
31.12.19.
10. Proposal for Steering
Committee
Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension
accorded on file.
*********
190
Agenda No.51.5.8: Ratification for approval of old funding pattern of GoI grant in respect of
setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Hi-Tech Metal Cluster,
Mohali, Punjab.
The proposal for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Mohali Hi-Tech Metal
Cluster, Mohali, Punjab was granted in-principle approval in 29th
Meeting of Steering Committee of
MSE-CDP held on 24.02.12 and later on, granted final approval on file. Final approval letter was
issued on 03.07.13 with following means of finance:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars Amount
(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1106.85
(ii) SPV contribution 160.84
(iii) Unsecured Loan from members & others 140.00
Total 1407.69
2. After approval of the project, it was learnt that the SPV of the CFC earlier had availed
Rs.1.00 crore GoI grant from Ministry of Commerce & Industry under ASIDE Scheme for the same
project towards construction of the building without furnishing any information to State
Government and Ministry of MSME.
3. The matter was placed before Steering Committee and Steering Committee in its 40th
meeting held on 23.06.16 & 02.07.16 for deliberation and the Committee decided to reduce the GoI
contribution to the extent, after taking into account GoI grant availed by SPV under ASIDE Scheme
of Ministry of Commerce. Thus, the GoI grant under MSE-CDP has been revised to Rs. 1006.85
lakh. The revised financials are as given below:
(Rs. in lakh)
S. No. Particulars : Amount
(i) Grant received under ASIDE Scheme : 100.00
(ii) Grant to be released under MSE-CDP : 1006.85
(iii) SPV contribution : 160.84
(iv) Unsecured Loan from members & others : 140.00
Total : 1407.69
4. Based on the advice of Government of Punjab, for reverting to old funding pattern with GoI
grant of Rs.1106.85 lakh (to utilize an amount of Rs. 100.00 lakh received by SPV i.e. M/s Mohali
Hitech Metal Cluster Pvt. Ltd. under ASIDE Scheme for setting up of CFC in Hi-Tech Metal
Cluster, Mohali, Punjab in other ASIDE projects), SPV has returned Rs.100.00 lakh received under
ASIDE scheme to PSIEC, Chandigarh. Accordingly, approval of Secretary (MSME) has been
obtained on file to retain GoI grant as Rs.1106.85 lakh.
5. Steering Committee may kindly ratify approval to retain GoI grant as Rs.1106.85 lakh for
setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali, Punjab.
*****