government of india - wrpcwrpc.gov.in/ccm/62ccm_minute.pdfminutes of the 62nd commercial committee...

Baart sarkarGovernment of India kond`Iya ivaVut p`aiQakrNa

Central Electricity Authority piScama xao~Iya ivaVut saimait

Western Regional Power Committee ef -3, emaAayaDIsaI xao~, AMQaorI (pUva-), mauMba[- - 400 093

F-3, MIDC Area, Andheri (East), Mumbai - 400 093

Aa[- esa Aao : 9001-2008

ISO : 9001-2008

dUrBaaYa Phone: 022- 28221681; 28250004; 28200195; fO@sa Fax : 022 – 28370193 Website : www.wrpc.gov.in E-mail : [email protected]

saM#yaa : pxaoivasa /vaaiNaijyak –I / saIsaIema / kaya-vaR%t /2012- idnaaMk :22.10.2012 No. : WRPC/Comml.-I/CCM/Minutes/2012-10209 Date:22.10.2012 saovaa maoM / To, ( saUcaI ko Anausaar ) ivaYaya : 62 vaIM vaaiNaijyak saimait kI baOzk ka kaya-vaR%t . Sub : Minutes of 62nd Commercial Committee Meeting.

mahaodya / Sir, [sa p~ ko saaqa idnaaMk 08.10.2012 kao 1100 bajao samaRiQd vaoMcar pak-, enaTIpIsaI, emaAa[DIsaI maraola, AMQaorI pUva-, mauMba[- maoM hu[- p xao iva saimait kI vaaiNaijyak saimait kI 62 vaIM

baOzk ka kaya-vaR%t AapkI saUcanaa evaM AavaSyak kar-vaa[- hotu saMlagna hO.

Please find enclosed herewith Minutes of the 62nd Commercial

Committee Meeting of WRPC held on 08.10.2012 at 1100 Hrs at Samruddhi

Venture Park, NTPC, MIDC Marol, Andheri (E), Mumbai for your information

and necessary action.

BavadIya / Yours faithfully, saMlagna :- ]prao@tanausaar /As above sd/-

(Aao p` isaMh / O. P. Singh) AQaIxaNa AiBayaMta (vaaiNaijyak)

Superintending Engineer (Comml.)

Minutes of the 62nd Commercial Committee Meeting held on 08.10.2012 at Mumbai

Page

1

MINUTES OF 62nd MEETING OF COMMERCIAL COMMITTEE HELD ON 08th OCTOBER 2012 AT NTPC, MUMBAI

The 62nd meeting of Commercial Committee of WRPC was held at Mumbai on 08th

October 2012. The list of the participant is enclosed at Annex-1.

Shri S.D. Taksande, Member Secretary I/c, WRPC welcomed the participants of 62nd

Commercial Committee meeting. He thanked Shri S. S. Sen, GM (OS) NTPC and his

team for making excellent arrangements for the meeting. He briefly highlighted various

issues included in agenda. He hoped that members would deliberate on these issues and

arrive at decisions in an amicable manner. He requested Shri O. P. Singh, Superintending

Engineer (Comml), WRPC to take up the agenda items for discussion.

ITEM No.1: Confirmation of the minutes of the 61st meeting of Commercial

Committee

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) WRPC stated that the minutes of the 61st meeting

of Commercial Committee held on 10th April 2012 at WRPC Mumbai were circulated

vide WRPC letter no. WRPC/Comml-I/CCM/Minutes/2012-3805 dated 16.04.2012.

Following comments were received on the minutes:-

1) NTPC vide letter No. 01: CD: 203 Dated 01.05.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex-1.1)

have intimated that the metering arrangement at NTPC Mouda sent vide letter

dated 22nd Dec. 2011 was agreed by WRLDC in the 61st CCM during the

discussion under on Item 15 and requested to add “NTPC metering and accounting

scheme for Mouda (2x500MW) sent vide their letter dated 22nd Dec.2011 is

acceptable and stands approved” at Item No. 15 of the above MoM.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that the matter was deliberated in the

61st CCM where in WRLDC had intimated that the metering arrangements are

examined by them as per the metering guidelines of CEA and the details of the

arrangement is intimated to WRPC when the unit is first time synchronised with

the grid. The same is then made available by WRPC with the UI account of the

respective week. Further NTPC metering and accounting scheme for Mouda

(2x500MW) was not approved in the 61st CCM and it was under examination by


Page

2

WRLDC, therefore the above sought amendment by NTPC would not be in line

with deliberations..

2) PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS: COMML: NGP: 1100/1173 dated 15.05.2012(copy

enclosed at Annex-1.2) requested to modify the para recorded under item No.

12.1 “Committee opined that Charging of the line from one end only cannot be

treated as line synchronization for COD of a line .A line is required to be charged

and synchronized with established power flow for treating the line as

commissioned and only thereafter it can declared under commercial operation.

as

“SE (Commercial) opined that Charging of the line from one end only cannot be

treated as line synchronization for COD of a line .A line is required to be charged

and synchronized with established power flow for treating the line as

commissioned and only thereafter it can declared under commercial operation.”

and delete

“Committee opined that PGCIL may declare the line into commercial operation

w.e.f. the date of synchronization by putting all set of elements associated with it

in service when line is commercially available for wheeling the power.”

Of the last sub-para in the absence of consensus, further PGCIL has requested to

record the disagreement of PGCIL vide above letter as follows,

“POWERGRID did not agree with the contention that synchronization was

necessary for commercial operation, considering the CERC requirement. Code

was issued by WRLDC for the synchronization but it was not agreed by SLDC

(MP), may be due to system constraints. This was beyond the control of

POWERGRID and in such cases; commercial declaration cannot be deferred as

opined by POWERGRID”

MPPMCL vide letter No. 05-01/899 dated 23.05.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex-

1.3), have submitted that the opinion was put up by Shri K.K. Agrawal Addl.GM

(L&RA), MPPMCL on behalf of MP Power Management Company Ltd. Jabalpur

and accepted by SE (Commercial) and other SEBs also agreed with the opinion.

However, POWERGRID did not agree with the opinion of the Committee.


Page

3

3) POWERGRID vide letter WRTS-I: COMML: NGP: 75 dated 11.09.2012(copy

enclosed at Annex-1.4), has revised the declaration of commercial operation of

part of 400kV Korba-Birsingpur TL from Location No. 176/0 to Birsingpur

(MPPTCL) which was earlier declared successfully commissioned(COD) on

29.02.2012, vide their letter No. WRTS-I:COMML:NGP:1120 dated 01.03.2012

as follows;

a) Balance part of Korba/Balco-Birsingpur TL (first circuit) from Location

No.176/0 to Birsingpur (MPPTCL) has been commissioned successfully and

is in operation from 29.02.2012.

b) Balance part of Korba-Birsingpur TL(second circuit) from Location No.176/0

to Birsingpur (MPPTCL) has been commissioned successfully on 31st March

2012 along with line reactor at Birsingpur and is in operation.

has been revised as follows

a) Korba-Balco to Birsingpur (first circuit) date of commercial operation

01.03.2012

b) Korba to Birsingpur (second circuit) date of commercial operation 01.04.2012

D/c portion from Korba gantry till Loc 176/0 had been put in commercial

operation as already intimated vide letters dated 03.10.2011 & 01.012.2011.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that the above was not a part of

deliberations of 61st CCM. However, matter was discussed in the 20th WRPC

meeting and the decision on the above has been recorded in the minutes of the

20th WRPC meeting. Since comments have been received from POWERGRID

on the above issue, therefore it may further be discussed in the 21st WRPC

meeting.

4) Committee discussed the amendments sought by NTPC and POWERGRID and

also noted the contents of MPPMCL letter which was agreed by other SEBs.

After deliberations Committee agreed to add the following para:-

“POWERGRID did not agree with the contention that synchronization was

necessary for commercial operation, considering the CERC requirement. Code

was issued by WRLDC for the synchronization but it was not agreed by SLDC

(MP), may be due to system constraints. This was beyond the control of


Page

4

POWERGRID and in such cases; commercial declaration cannot be deferred as

opined by POWERGRID” as the forth para under item No. 12.1 of the minutes

of the 61st CCM.

The Minutes of 61st Commercial Committee meeting were confirmed with the

additions/modifications suggested at Sr. No.4 above.

ITEM No. 2: Revision of REAs.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that in accordance with the decision in the

60th CCM, WRPC vide letter no. WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/2012/179 Dtd.06.02.2012

have requested Powergrid to intimate the date of effect of LTA to Lanco Kondapalli, so

that REAs for the period prior to implementation of new transmission charges

Regulations 2010 (PoC), could be revised. However the date of effect of LTA to Lanco

Kondapalli was not intimated by Powergrid. WRPC vide WRPC/Comml-

I/3/ABTREA/2012/329 Dtd.15.03.2012 again requested Powergrid to communicate the

date of effect of LTA to Lanco Kondapalli.

In the absence of the above data the LTAs considered for sharing of WR transmission

charges during the revision of REAs for the month of March-11 to June-11 issued vide

letter dated 30.03.2012 were as follows;

1) Lanco Kondapalli targeted to WR : 200MW

2) DVC Mejia to MP : 400MW

In the 61st CCM, PGCIL representative stated that as per the REAs of SR the date of

effect of LTA to Lanco Kondapalli targeted to WR for a quantum of 150MW and targeted

to NR for quantum of 80MW without identifying beneficiaries’ in WR was 07th Dec

2009. Further date of effect of LTA to Lanco Kondapalli targeted to WR for a quantum of

200MW and targeted to NR for quantum of 150MW without identifying beneficiaries’ in

WR was 1st March 2010. 150MW LTA targeted to NR is wheeled through WR, therefore

share of 350MW (200MW to WR +150MW to NR) would be accounted in the

transmission shares of WR.

In the 61st CCM, the committee expressed that PGCIL shall formally communicate all

details (quantum, date etc) of effect of LTAs to Lanco Kondapalli and DVC Mejia to MP,

at the earliest. Accordingly PGCIL vide letter C/SEF/W/WRPC dated 29th June 2012

(copy enclosed at Annex-2.1) have communicated the quantum of LTA in respect of

Lanco Kondapalli as per the BPTA signed and targeted to WR & NR as 150MW and


Page

5

80MW respectively for the period Sept. 09 to Feb. 10 and 200MW and 150MW

respectively from Mar.10. The quantum of LTA without identifying beneficiaries’ in WR

& NR has been revised to 150MW and 100 MW respectively w.e.f. 01.02.2012.

GUVNL vide letter GUVNL:GM(Com.):2146 dated 17.09.2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex-2.6) have requested to discuss the issue of inclusion of Lanco Kondapalli in the

transmission shares of WR in this CCM so as to finalise the matter and enable settling

the adjustments of transmission charges with PGCIL.

Lanco Kondapalli vide letter LKPL:WRPC:4587:2012 dated 10.09.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex-2.7) have intimated that Lanco have represented their case to PGCIL

and have submitted that neither BPTA dated 02.09.2009 nor CERC (Open access in Inter

State Transmission) Regulations 2004 permit POWERGRID to share WR transmission

charges by Lanco Kondapalli.

Reply of PGCIL(vide letter WRTS-I: COML/Nagpur:67 dated 07.09.2012) to M/s

Lanco Kondapalli’s representation is enclosed at Annex.-2.8.

Member Secretary-I/C WRPC stated that representation have been received from

Lanco Kondapalli(LKPL) on the revised REA accounts for the month of Mar-11 to June-

11. The representative from Lanco Kondapalli has been invited to this meeting for

explaining their point of view on the LTA considered in the above REAs. He stated that

Committee may discuss the issue and come out with a decision in line the regulations of

the Commission.

Lanco Kondapalli(LKPL) representative made following points;

a) Lanco on 25.02.2008 submitted an application to PGCIL for grant of long term

open access of Inter-state Transmission System as per CERC (Open Access in

Inter-state Transmission) Regulations 2004 from its generating plant located at

Kondapalli IDA Krishna District in SR. In its application Lanco submitted that

point of injection of power shall be PGCIL sub station near Nunna, which falls in

Southern Region. Since no long term beneficiaries were tied up it provided that

target point of drawl of power shall be Western Region 200 MW and Northern

Region 150 MW.

b) The issue of grant of above stated LTOA to Lanco was discussed in the meeting

of the Standing Committee on 03.03.2009 wherein it was clearly recorded that in

the absence of finalization of beneficiaries the project authorities can sell power to

any constituent in SR/WR/NR following the short term open access regulations


Page

6

and by paying applicable short term transmission charges. It was further clarified

that “in any case project authority shall have to share transmission charges of

Southern Region proportionate to their installed capacity. Chief Engineer

(SP&PA), CEA referred to the regulation-33 of the CERC’s Tariff regulation,

2009 wherein the issue has been covered in detail.” From the above it is clear

that the transmission charges were to be paid by Lanco as per the CERC (Terms

and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009 including regulation 33 thereof.

c) The long term open access was granted to Lanco on 06.07.2009. The said

permission clearly showed that there was no identified beneficiary and WR and

NR were shown as target drawee utilities.

d) A BPTA was signed between Lanco and PGCIL on 02.09.2009. It clearly shows

that there were no identified beneficiaries and target drawee utilities were shown

as any constituent State in Western Region and Northern Region. Clause 2 of the

BPTA provided that the LTOA has been granted in accordance with CERC (Open

Access in Inter-state Transmission) Regulations, 2004. Therefore it is clear that

the open access has been granted to Lanco under the 2004 regulations. It may be

noted that the said 2004 regulations in Regulation 16 (i) provided that the

transmission charges will be in accordance with the terms and conditions of tariff

notified by CERC from time to time. This makes it clear that transmission charges

were to be paid by Lanco as per CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff)

Regulations, 2009 since they came into force before the grant of LTOA approval

to Lanco.

e) The transmission charges to be paid by any long term open access customer

continued to be paid according to the CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff)

Regulations, 2009 including Regulation 33 thereof. Therefore there is no question

of any change in the payment mechanism or sharing of transmission charges by

Lanco due to the coming into force of CERC (Grant of Connectivity, Long Term

Access and Medium Term Open Access in Inter-state Transmission and Related

matters) Regulations, 2009.

CERC framed (Sharing of Inter-state Transmission Charges and Losses)

Regulations, 2010 on 15.06.2010. The said Regulations came into force on

01.07.2011. After coming into force of the said regulations Regulation 33 of the


Page

7

CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations 2009 was repealed and a new

sharing of transmission charges and losses regime came into force. Since the said

regulations have a prospective effect the said regulations can be applied to the

BPTA dated 2.9.2009 between Lanco and PGCIL from 1.7.2011 only and not

retrospectively.

f) On 24.11.2011 CERC made a first amendment to its (Sharing of Inter-state

Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations 2010, which provided for the Point

of Demand (PoD) charges and inclusion of definition of target region for the first

time in the regulation with effect from the date of publication of the said regulation

in the official gazette. The above amendment regulations were published in the

official gazette on 25.11.2011 and came into force on the said date. The provisions

of this regulations can not be given any retrospective effect and are prospective in

nature.

Thus, from the above it is clear that before 01.07.2011 it is only CERC ( Terms &

Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009 applied to the said BPTA dated 02.09.2009 and

there is no occasion for PGCIL – WR to raise bill for a period prior to 01.07.2011 on the

basis of the CERC (Sharing of Inter-state Transmission Charges and Losses)

Regulations, 2010. The bill dated 24.08.2011 raised by PGCIL – WR on Lanco for the

period March 2011 to June 2011 is not valid and cannot be sustained. In view of the

above it is kindly requested that the revision in REA may be reverted and PGCIL be

directed to withdraw the bill dated 24.08.2012.

GUVNL representative with regards to point b) stated that in the minutes of meeting of

the Standing Committee of SR held on 03.03.2009, there is no mention of the fact that

LKPL, in the absence of finalization of beneficiaries, has to share only SR transmission

charges and not to share the regional transmission charges of WR & NR and related inter-

regional link charges. However it was clarified that in the above said meeting that “in

any case project authority shall have to share transmission charges of Southern Region

proportionate to their installed capacity. Chief Engineer (SP&PA), CEA referred to the

regulation-33 of the CERC’s Tariff regulation, 2009 wherein the issue has been covered

in detail.”


Page

8

GUVNL representative further stated that as per regulation 33 (7) of the CERC (Terms

and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009, which is an independent regulation

providing for sharing & payment of regional as well as Inter-regional transmission

charges in accordance to regulation 33 (1) to (4) by the concerned generating company (in

this case LKPL) corresponding to any plant capacity for which a beneficiary has not been

identified and contracted which was in force before grant of LTOA to LKPL and signing

of BPTA by LKPL. Therefore LKPL is required to pay the transmission charges for the

target regions as well as the transmission charges for the inter-regional links involved also

in addition to the SR transmission charges, since the beneficiaries have not been

identified. The inclusion of LKPL in the revised REA accounts for the months of March

2011 to June 2011 were not because of giving retrospective effect to CERC’s (Sharing of

Inter-state Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations, 2010 or CERC’s (Sharing of

Inter-state Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations 2010 (first amendment) which

came into effect from 25.11.2011. However it is as per the regulation in force at that time

i.e. CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2009. GUVNL representative

further requested that instead of 200MW the share of LKPL be revised to 350 MW in the

WR transmission account since 150 MW targeted to NR is through the WR transmission

system. Further, as regards submission of LKPL in its letter no. LKPL:PGCIL:4549:2012

dated 31.08.2012, that LKPL is neither a ‘beneficiary’ as required by 33(i) and 33(ii) nor

a Generating company owning generating stations connected to inter-state transmission

system in western region as required by 33(iii), GUVNL representative pointed out that

the opening words of regulation 3, “In these regulations, unless the context otherwise

requires” are relevant in respect of definition of ‘beneficiary’ and therefore, LKPL in

absence of identified long term customers is beneficiary for Regulation 33(1) and 33(2) in

respect of sharing of regional transmission charges and Regulation 33 (3) for sharing of

Inter-regional links charges. GUVNL representative also pointed out that CTU’s letter

dated 07.09.2012 at para-4 reads as, “M/s LANCO Kondapalli has signed BPTA on 2nd

September, 2009 and agreed to pay transmission charges to WR, NR, SR including inter-

regional links & ULDC charges.”

GUVNL representative citing LKPL letter no. LKPL: WRPC: 4587:2012 dated

10.09.2012, told that LKPL have not been charged compensation for relinquishing the

100MW of LTOA since there was no stranded capacity because of relinquishing of part

of LTOA as per CTU. However, as per regulation (12) of the CERC (Open Access in

Inter-state Transmission) Regulations, 2004 for Exit Option “ A long-term customer shall


Page

9

not relinquish or transfer his rights and obligations specified in the Bulk Power

Transmission Agreement, without prior approval of the Commission and subject to

payment of compensation, as may be determined by the Commission”. Therefore before

relinquishing the part of LTOA whether prior approval of the Commission is required or

not and whether CTU is competent to relinquish the LTOA without payment of

compensation or whether any approval of Hon’ble CERC is taken both in case of M/s

LKPL and M/s Torrent Power Limited. POWERGRID representative stated that such

matters are discussed in the meeting on LTOA in respective Regions and the decisions

might have been taken following the procedures laid down in the regulations on

relinquishing the LTOA without payment of compensation. He agreed to revert back on

the matter for clarifying the issue. GUVNL representative referring to Clause no.

31.1.1.(i) of “Detailed Procedures of Central Transmission Utility under Regulation 27

(1) of the CERC (Grant of Connectivity, Long-term Access and Medium-term Open

Access in inter-State Transmission and related matters) Regulations, 2009” conveyed

that the same is applicable in these cases.

LKPL representative informed that exit option in CERC (Open Access in Inter-state

Transmission) Regulations, 2004 has been repealed in the CERC (Grant of Connectivity,

Long-term Access and Medium-term Open Access in inter-State Transmission and related

matters) Regulations, 2009.

Referring to the routing of LTA targeted to NR, POWERGRID representative clarified

that the LTOA targeted to NR is routed through WR as per BPTA signed and therefore

the total quantum of LTOA of LKPL will have to be considered in the WR transmission

share.

Committee expressed that retrospective effect have not been given to the CERC’s

(Sharing of Inter-state Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations 2010 (first

amendment), while considering the share of LKPL in the revised REAs for the

months of Mar-11 to June-11 for sharing of transmission charges of WR which

pertained to pre PoC regime and share of LKPL has been considered as per LTA

and prevailing regulation at that point of time. Further, as intimated by

POWERGRID the LTOA targeted to NR and routed through WR may also be

considered for sharing of transmission charges of WR. LKPL may approach CERC


Page

10

if it feels that the interpretation of the Commercial Committee is not as per CERC

regulations cited above.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that with reference to DVC Mejia it has

been intimated by PGCIL that as per GoI allocation 200MW from DVC Mejia U# 5 & 6

(100MW from each unit) has been allocated to M.P. and no separate LTA has been given

by POWERGRID to DVC Mejia U# 5 & 6.

WRPC vide letter WRPC/Comml-I/REA(Corr)/2012/955 dated 03.07.2012 (copy

along with representation of MPPMCL & reply of NLDC POSOCO enclosed at Annex.-

2.2) copy endorsed to ED(SEF), have again requested PGCIL to clarify on the different

status(i.e. LTA in one correspondence and GoI allocation in other correspondence) of the

LTA from DVC to MP.

PGCIL vide letter no. WRTS-1/Comml./2011/11 dated 13.07.2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex-2.3) addressed to M/s WRT (Maharashtra) Pvt. Ltd., have advised to raise the

adjustment bill on the revision in REA issued by WRPC on 30th March 2012, after the

REA is modified, since the revision in REA is already contested by MP and M/s Torrent

Power.

PGCIL was requested vide copy of the letter No. WRPC/Comml-I/REA

(Corr)/2012/955 dated 03.07.2012, endorsed to them to give the exact quantum and date

of effect of the GoI allocation or the LTOA from DVC Mejia to M.P., so that the pre PoC

REAs can be further revised which is still awaited from them.

GM WRLDC stated that in 2011 a meeting was convened in ER to address the issue of

effect of allocations from DVC Mejia/ Chandrapura plants to various utilities. Therefore

the minutes of the meeting may be referred to ascertain the exact dates for effect of the

LTA/GoI allocations.

Committee opined that in absence of clarity on LTOA/GoI allocations in the above

meeting the share for transmission charges for LTOA/GoI allocations from DVC

Mejia/Chandrapura to MPPTCL may be considered as per the REAs of ER, since the

allocations for ER stations is issued by GoI through ERPC.

PGCIL representative agreed on the above suggestion made by GM WRLDC, PGCIL

would also give a formal communication to WRPC on above.


Page

11

M/s Torrent Power vide letter TPL/SUGEN/COMMERCIAL/12-13/028 dated

15.06.2012(copy enclosed at Annex-2.4) have intimated that the 100MW LTOA from

TPL to MP from 27.03.11(effective from April 2011) has not been considered in the

revised REAs for April-June-11.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) intimated that this would be incorporated during

further revision in REAs for April-2011 to June-2011, after receipt of communication

on revision in requite data from WRLDC in respect of Korba Stage-III for the period

21.3.2011 to 30.6.2011.

GUVNL vide letter GUVNL: GM (Com):1345 dated 07.06.2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex-2.5) have requested for revision of REAs for the following reasons:

(i) Inclusion of 148MW share of Maharashtra from Kahalgaon-II as per allocation of

MoP vide letter dated 19.03.2010 for the period Aug-10 to Jan-11.

(ii) Inclusion of 350MW LTOA of Lanco Kondapalli w.e.f 07th Dec 2009 to 28th Feb

2010 for WR Inter State & respective Inter Regional charges and wheeling of power

to DD & DNH.

(iii) Monthly transmission charges for transmission of power to DD & DNH through

GETCO transmission system for the period 01.04.2004 to 31.03.2009 and up to

30.06.2011 as per CERC order dated 31.07.2009 and 03.02.2009.

Committee opined that 148MW share of Maharashtra from Kahalgaon-II as per

allocation of MoP vide letter dated 19.03.2010 for the period Aug-10 to Jan-11 shall be

considered for revision in the REA for the period Aug-10 to Jan-11. As regards to

monthly transmission charges for transmission of power to DD & DNH through

GETCO transmission system for the period 01.04.2004 to 31.03.2009 and up to

30.06.2011 the same was discussed in the 13th meeting of WRPC held on 09th April

2010 at Mumbai wherein the discussion on this matter has been recorded at Item 10.2.

Revisions if any may be done as per the decision of the above WRPC meeting.

OPTCL vide letter RT&C-Bill-31/2006(Vol-II)/4195(4) dated 06.07.12 (copy enclosed

at Annex-2.9) have requested to furnish the year/month wise allocation of ER NTPC

power stations to WR constituents from financial year 2004 onwards.

Committee opined that the information of allocation of ER NTPC power stations to WR

constituents from financial year 2004 onwards is reflected in the REAs and OPTCL

may refer to the REAs.


Page

12

ITEM No. 3: Evacuation of power from Korba STPS-III of NTPC.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that in the matter of evacuation of power

from Korba unit 7 of stage III of NTPC station after declaration of commercial operation

(COD) of the unit till commissioning of the identified 400 kV Raipur-Korba D/c line,

Hon’ble CERC vide para no 32 of order dated 6.9.2011 in petition no 122/2011 has

directed as follows:

Quote:

“In view of the foregoing discussion, we have come to the conclusion that the petitioner

is bound by the terms and conditions of the BPTA and the Implementation Agreement

signed by it with the CTU. However, after allocation of power from Korba-III by

Government of India, Ministry of Power to the western region beneficiaries and

execution of PPAs by the petitioner, the western region beneficiaries have become long

term customers by operation of Regulation 2(1)(m) of the Connectivity Regulations. The

long term customers have right to schedule power on long term access from Korba-III on

the available spare capacity and such scheduling shall have priority over the medium

term open access and short term open access. The ATS for Korba-III was declared under

commercial operation with effect from 27.6.2011. Consequently, scheduling of power

from Korba-III for the period from 21.3.2011 to 26.6.2011 on the existing transmission

capacity shall be deemed to have been made on long-term access. The energy and UI

accounts shall be revised and settled accordingly. “

Un-Quote

The WR Power Committee in the 18th WRPC meeting held on 1.10.2011 decided that

WRLDC would refund whatever charges collected by WRLDC from all the constituents

on account of short term scheduling of power from Korba-III and would furnish

necessary data to WRPC Secretariat to revise the energy and UI accounts and suggested

that accounting details may be finalized based on data to be furnished by WRLDC in line

with the above mentioned CERC order dated 6.9.2011.

In order to implement the above order of Hon’ble Commission, WRLDC have

submitted the 15-minute block-wise data viz DC of unit no 7 of Korba-III, entitlements of

beneficiaries of Korba-III, their Long-Term schedules from Korba-III and related data


Page

13

necessary for preparation of revised energy and UI accounts data on 08.02.2012.

Accordingly, the REAs have been revised on 30.03.2012.

During examination of revision of UI based on the data submitted by WRLDC it was

observed that the revised schedules submitted by WRLDC remained unchanged and there

would not be any change in payable/receivables on account of this for the above period.

Hence the revision of UI A/c’s was not undertaken.

In the 61st CCM, while discussing examination of the revision of UI, beneficiaries

expressed that during few occasions they were unable to revise the schedules since the

schedules were treated as STOA and any revision of the requisitioned schedules would

not have been effective before expiry of a minimum period of two (2) days and not from

the fourth time block as in case of LT schedules. Conversion of STOA schedules of

beneficiaries to LTA schedules without any change in schedules due to revision of DC

(as available in LTA schedules) have deprived the beneficiaries to avail the benefit of

revision of schedules due to revision of DC which otherwise would have been available

had the schedules been treated as LT schedules.

The Commercial Committee suggested forming of a small group comprising of

members from constituents, NTPC & WRLDC who would look into such instances and

the practicability of implementing post-facto revision of schedules and give its

recommendation accordingly.

The group met on 14.05.2012, and it was decided that NTPC would submit following

data for the period 21.3.2011 to 30.6.2011 for revision of schedules:-

(i) date and time of tripping of Korba-III unit

(ii) declared date and time of restoration of the unit

(iii) actual date and time of restoration of the unit

(iv) DC prior (at the time of tripping)

(v) DC after restoration (at the time of restoration of the unit).

During the 20th WRPC meeting held at Indore on 18.05.2012, WRLDC and PGCIL

representatives informed that a petition has been filed with Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal

against the above order of Hon’ble CERC by PGCIL. MPPMC in the meeting requested

to issue the revised UI account in defined time frame preferably before next WRP


Page

14

Committee meeting to be held in September 2012, which was agreed by the WRP

Committee.

WR Power Committee in 20th WRPC recommended that since there is no stay on

Hon’ble CERC order by Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal, the CERC directives could be acted

upon so that the dues are settled as per CERC order, revision of UI A/c’s shall be carried

out by WRPC on receipt of revised data from WRLDC.

As decided by small group comprising of members from constituents, NTPC &

WRLDC regarding submission of data by NTPC, NTPC vide email dated 01.06.2012

submitted the data which was circulated to the beneficiaries and WRLDC for validation

vide WRPC letter WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/2012/739 dated 01.06.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex-3.1) and reminder to beneficiaries for forwarding their comments if

any by 25.06.2012, vide letter WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/2012/864 dated 20.06.2012

(copy enclosed at Annex-3.2). MPPTCL vide their letter 07-05/RPC-14/1273 dated

14.06.2012 (received on 27.06.2012 copy enclosed at Annex-3.3) have intimated that the

data submitted by NTPC was verified and is in order.

WRPC vide letter WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/2012/904 dated 26.06.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex-3.4) requested WRLDC for revision of schedules based on the data

forwarded, observations of GUVNL and as per the decision taken in the meeting held on

14th May 2012 at WRPC.

WRLDC vide letter WRLDC/MO-II/2012/6806 dated 13.08.2012(copy enclosed at

Annex-3.5) have intimated that the Data forwarded in the above matter only contains

tripping details of NTPC Korba Stage-III and with this data the schedules cannot be

revised and 96 block wise DC which is agreeable to all the constituents is required for

revision in schedules of NTPC Korba Stage-III. POWERGRID did not agree with the

aforesaid CERC order dated 06.09.11 and has submitted its appeal before Appellate

Tribunal against the CERC order. The same has been accepted by Appellate Tribunal and

the first hearing already taken place on 23.07.2012. Further they have intimated that the

matter is still sub-judice and the decision of Appellate Tribunal is awaited, the matter will

be settled after the decision of Appellate Tribunal.

WRPC in view of the decisions of 20th WR Power Committee vide letter

WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/2012/1296 dated 17.08.2012(copy enclosed at Annex-3.6),

requested WRLDC to review their stand expressed in the above letter in view of


Page

15

GM WRLDC stated that they have not received the data of DC prior (at the time of

tripping) and DC after restoration. NTPC representative informed that this data was

already given to WRLDC and the same would again be given to WRLDC.

MSEDCL representative stated that there would be modification/revision of the

beneficiary schedules during which the DC of Korba Stage-III was revised by NTPC also

in addition to above. Other members expressed that as decided in the meeting to discuss

revision of the schedules in respect of Korba Stage –III held on 14th May 2012 the failure

to revise the schedules under such occasions was the individual organisational issue and

had it been addressed by MSEDCL the way other beneficiaries addressed the issue would

not have aroused.

GUVNL/GETCO, CSPDCL/CSPTCL, MPPMCL representative were of the opinion

that they do not intend to agree modification/revision of schedules as desired by

MSEDCL, since this would mean revision of the schedules post facto. GUVNL/GETCO,

CSPDCL/CSPTCL, MPPMCL representative stated that they have acted based on the real

time drawal status of their utilities at that point of time and any revision in schedules as

desired by MSEDCL would have adverse UI implications on their utilities which has not

been directed in the CERCs order.

Committee discussed and expressed that post facto modification/revision of schedules

would be inappropriate as other beneficiaries except Maharashtra have acted based on

the real time drawal status of their utilities ( might have availed the URS) at that point

of time. NTPC may give the data of DC prior (at the time of tripping) and DC after

restoration as decided in the meeting held on 14th May 2012 at the earliest to WRLDC

and WRLDC shall revise and submit the data to WRPC for further revisions of REA

and UI accounts.

ITEM NO.4: Certification to NTPC for the deemed generation due to gas shortage

at its Kawas & Gandhar gas based power stations for the period prior

to August 1996

CEA vide letter No.1/WR/Cor/GM-12/273 dated 26.03.2012 have intimated that the

matter regarding certification to NTPC for the deemed generation due to gas shortage at

its Kawas & Gandhar gas based power stations for the period prior August 1996 was

discussed by the Authority at its special meeting held on 19th March 2012 and decided


Page

16

that the data received by WRPC secretariat from NTPC for loss of generation due to

shortage of gas for the period prior to August 1996 be placed again in the next WRPC

meeting before submission to CEA for certification.

The matter was discussed in the 61st Commercial Committee Meeting, and the

constituents were requested to give their observation on data placed at Annexure-6.2 of

the CCM.

In the 20th WRP Committee meeting WRPC Committee consented for forwarding the

verified loss of generation data in respect of Kawas & Gandhar Gas Power Station for the

period prior to August 1996 to CEA with a very clear legal rider that this in no way shall

impact the contracts between various constituents.

Accordingly WRPC vide letter WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/NTPC/2012/856 dated

19.06.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex-4.1) forwarded the verified loss of generation data

in respect of Kawas & Gandhar Gas Power Station for the period prior to August 1996 to

CEA with a very clear legal rider that this in no way shall impact the contracts between

various constituents along with the comments received from beneficiaries.

MPPMCL representative stated that the comments of MPPMCL forwarded vide letter No.

05-01/828 dated 14th May 2012 were not conveyed to CEA.

WRPC intimated that the above comments of MPPMCL were separately

communicated to CEA vide letter WRPC/Comml-I/3/ABTREA/NTPC/2012/881 dated

21.06.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex-4.2). MPPMCL also intimated during the meeting

that they have separately endorsed a copy to CEA.

Committee noted as above.

ITEM No.5: Grid disturbance on 30.07.2012 & 31.07.2012 and the implications on

the schedules of WR constituents.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that following representations

were received as regards to revision of schedules during the grid disturbances of

30/31.07.2012

1) CSPTCL vide letter No. 03-02/SLDC/RA/UI/WRPC/1187 dated 06.08.2012

(copy enclosed at Annex.-5.1) have intimated that during the Grid Incidences

in WR-NR-ER-NER on 30.07.2012 & 31.07.2012, it has been observed that


Page

17

both the DSPM units of CSPGCL tripped simultaneously. The throw OFF of

450MW resulted in the change of the drawal status of CG State.

SLDC, CSPTCL have requested to call off the implication of the UI charges

during the disturbance period as declared by NLDC.

2) CGPL Mundra vide letter CGPL-UMPP/O&M/WRLDC/0193 dated 30th July

2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-5.2), have informed that there were instances

of grid disturbances on 30.07.2012 resulting in disturbances in 400kV

system, due to which Unit #20 got tripped at 06:15hrs and Unit#10 tripped at

06:58hrs on 30.07.12. due to the above trippings , CGPL, Mundra could not

able to inject the power as scheduled. Therefore CGPL desired that under

these circumstances, any under injection during such grid failure is not

attributable to CGPL and no UI penalty is payable during the same period.

CGPL Mundra vide letter CGPL-UMPP/O&M/WRLDC/0194 dated 31st July

2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-5.3), have informed that there were instances

of grid disturbances on 31.07.2012 resulting in disturbances in 400kV

system, due to which Unit #20 got tripped at 05:08hrs on 31.07.12. due to the

above trippings , CGPL, Mundra could not able to inject the power as

scheduled. Therefore CGPL desired that under these circumstances, any

under injection during such grid failure is not attributable to CGPL and no UI

penalty is payable during the same period.

3) SLDC MSETCL vide letter No.MSLDC/TECH/SO/1815 dated 22.08.12

(copy enclosed at Annex.-5.4) addressed to WRLDC POSOCO have

intimated that during the two major disturbances occurred on 30.07.12 &

31.07.12, no instruction of curtailment was received on 30.07.12 & 31.07.12

for interstate bi-lateral transaction. Also there was no revision of schedules on

WRLDC website on the same day. The only instruction of curtailment was

received for 31.07.12 for power exchange transactions (collective transaction)

from 13:00 to 24:00hrs. The JAW-PSCL and AMNEPL-West Bengal Power

approved OA transactions were reduced to zero for the above period as seen

from the implemented schedules posted on the WRLDC web site and the

above transactions were revised suo moto on the next day in WRLDC

schedules. As there was no instruction from RLDC about the revision of

power in real time, power was injected in the grid by the above entities, hence

affecting the Intra state settlement of Energy account, as buyers duration of


Page

18

purchase is revised post dated, causing imbalance. SLDC therefore have

sought decision in this regard of curtailed powers.

Member Secretary-I/C WRPC stated that the trippings under heads 1, 2 and

Vindhyachal units were deliberated in the 115th PCM where in the Protection sub-

Committee expressed that above tripping were due to mal operation of relays except

tripping at Vindhyachal. He then requested members to deliberate on the issue.

As regards to point 1 above members deliberated on the issue and were of the opinion

that since the Protection sub-Committee was of the view that tripping of DSPM units of

CSPGCL was undesirable from protection point of view and could not be attributed to

grid disturbances of 30.07.2012 & 31.07.2012.

As regards to point 2 above, GM WRLDC, stated that CGPL was not able to maintain

the schedules due to tripping of associated transmission lines for evacuation of CGPL

generation thereby islanding the CGPL units on 30.07.2012 and therefore qualifies for

revision/suspension of schedules, though islanding of CGPL units and thereafter

tripping of the same was not attributed to the grid disturbance. As regards to the

tripping of CGPL units on 31.07.2012 the tripping data may be forwarded by CGPL to

WRLDC. WRLDC would examine the same and would take decision.

As regards to point 3 above GM WRLDC stated that on 30.07.12 & 31.07.12, the grid

disturbance took place in NR and the decision of curtailment/revision of schedules was to

be taken by NRLDC and WRLDC cannot take decision of

curtailment/revision/suspension of schedules for disturbance in other regions. As soon as

the decision of NRLDC was received the same was communicated to the respective

SLDCs/entities.

MSLDC/ CSPTCL representative stated that the regional and state UI mechanisms are

different; it is very difficult for them to adjust/settle the state UI, under such

circumstances. GM WRLDC stated that the over injection of entities due to

curtailment/revision/suspension of schedules by other regions due to grid disturbance

shall be treated as UI.

NTPC representative intimated that the tripping of VSTPS was discussed in the

Protection sub-Committee meeting of WRPC held on 06/07.09.2012, and the Protection

sub-Committee expressed that Vindhyachal units tripped under grid disturbance.


Page

19

The Commercial sub-Committee discussed the matter and it was decided that the

schedules of VSTPS may be revised by WRLDC to actual generation during the

tripping at VSTPS on 30.07.2012 and the same would be furnished by WRLDC to

WRPC for revision of UIs and REAs.

ITEM No.6: Implementation of CERC( IEGC) (First amendment) Regulations 2012

and CERC (UI charges and related matters)(Second Amendment)

Regulations 2012 wef 00:00hrs of 17th Sep. 2012.

SE© stated that CERC vide notification dated 05th March 2012 have issued second

amendment to Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled Interchange

Charges and Related Matters) Regulations, 2009 and now referred to as Central

Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and Related

Matters) (Second Amendment ) Regulations, 2012.

The major changes in this amendment w.r.t. regulation 2009 as tabulated below were

informed to the members:

Sr. No.

Particulars Earlier Amendment

A. Caping for deviation from schedules

1. Caping rate for Generators(coal/lignite /APM gas)

403 P/Kwh for OI and UI subject to capping of 155 P/Kwh for OI of more than 105% of DC in a block or 101% of Avg. D.C. over a day.

421.50 P/Kwh for OI subject to capping of 165 P/Kwh for OI of more than 105% of DC in a block or 101% of Avg. D.C. over a day.

2. Capping rate for seller 403 P/Kwh for OI when Inj > 120 % of schedule subject to capping of 155 P/Kwh for OI of more than 105% of IC in a block or 101% of Avg. IC over a day.

450 P/Kwh for OI when Inj> 120 % of schedule, subject to capping of 165 P/Kwh for OI of more than 105% of IC in a block or 101% of Avg. IC over a day.

3. Capping rate for buyer and beneficiary

403 P/Kwh for OD when Drl > 110 % of schedule or by 250 MW

450 P/Kwh for OD when Drl > 110 % of schedule or by 250 MW whichever is less.

4. Capping for infirm injection

403 P/Kwh for actual Inj

---


Page

20

C. Capping of infirm injection

4a Infirm power by generators(coal/lignite /Hydro)

--- 165 P/Kwh for actual inj

4b Infirm power by generators(APM gas)


4c Infirm power by generators(Imported coal/RLNG)


4d Infirm power by generators(Liquid fuel)


C. Additional UI for overdrawal and underinjection

6 Generators(coal/lignite /APM gas)

20 % of 403 P/Kwh when freq 49.5-49.2,

40 % of 403 P/Kwh when freq <49.2

10 % of 421.5 P/Kwh when freq 49.7-49.5,

20 % of 421.5 P/Kwh when freq <49.5

40 % of 421.5 P/Kwh when freq <49.5

7 Other generator/ Seller 20 % of 873 P/Kwh when freq 49.5-49.2,


10 % of 900 P/Kwh when freq 49.7-49.5,

20 % of 900 P/Kwh when freq 49.5-49.2


8 Buyer/beneficiary 40 % of 873 P/Kwh when freq 49.5-49.2,


20 % of 900 P/Kwh when freq 49.7-49.5,

40 % of 900 P/Kwh when freq 49.5-49.2


Abbreviations: OD-Overdrawal; UD-Underdrawl; OI-Over Injection; UI-Under Injection; DC-Declaired Capacity; IC-Installed Capacity.

As per the new regulations there is a change in the treatment of the infirm power

injected into the grid by a generating unit during testing and prior to COD of the unit

where the main fuel used for such generation (as specified in the Schedule “A” of the

Regulation) is required to be furnished by WRLDC from the date of effect of these


Page

21

regulations. The matter was discussed in the 61st CCM where WRLDC agreed to

provide the above data.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) further intimated that a writ petition no. 8509 &

8510/2012 dated 31.03.2012 was filed by TANGEDCO in the High court of

Jurisdiction of Madras challenging the CERC (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and

Related Matters) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012 and on (First Amendment)

of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Indian Electricity Grid Code)

Regulations, 2012. The Hon’ble High Court of Madras ordered a stay on the

Unscheduled Interchange Charges and Related Matters (Second Amendment)

Regulations, 2012 and on (First Amendment) of Central Electricity Regulatory

Commission (Indian Electricity Grid Code) Regulations, 2010.

NLDC POSOCO vide notice dated 14th September 2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-

6.1) have informed that, Writ petition no. 8509 & 8510/2012 dated 31.03.2012 filed

by TANGEDCO has been dismissed by the Honourable High Court of Madras vide

judgement dated 14th Sep 2012. Therefore CERC (Indian Electricity Grid Code)(First

Amendment) Regulations 2012 and CERC (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and

related matters (Second Amendment) Regulations 2012 would be effective from

00:00hrs of 17th September 2012.


ITEM No.7: Declaration of generating units into commercial operation. 7.1:CGPL Mundra (UMPP) vide letter CGPL-

UMPP/O&M/Unit#20/COD/WRLDC/0192 Dtd. 29.07.2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex.-7.1) have intimated that Unit No. 20 have successfully completed the 72hrs

commissioning test. The second unit (Unit No. 20) will achieve its Commercial

Operation (COD) 30th July 2012.

7.2 :NTPC vide letter 01:CD:227 dated 31.07.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-7.2) have

intimated that Unit No#3 of 660MW of Sipat Super Thermal Power Station Stage –

I is declared for Commercial operation w.e.f. 00:00Hrs of 01.08.2012.



Page

22

ITEM No.8: Declaration of transmission elements into commercial operation by PGCIL.

8.1: PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMML:NGP/1192 dated 04.06.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex.-8.1) have intimated that up gradation of Seoni-Wardha Ckt-I

from 400kV to 765kV along with bays at Seoni & Wardha under Mundra TS

have been successfully commissioned & declaired under commercial operation

w.e.f. 01st June 2012. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges for above

assests of Mundra Transmission System will be payable from 01st June 2012 by

concerned DICs as per CERC (sharing of inter state transmission charges and

losses) Regulation 2010.

8.2: PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMML:NGP/1191 dated 04.06.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex.-8.2) have intimated that circuit-2 of 400kV Mouda-Wardha

D/c line along with bay at Wardha under Mouda TS have been successfully

commissioned & declaired under commercial operation w.e.f. 01st June 2012.

Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges for above assests of Mouda

Transmission System will be payable from 01st June 2012 by concerned DICs as

per CERC (sharing of inter state transmission charges and losses) Regulation

2010.

8.3 : PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMML:NGP/1210 dated 29.06.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex.-8.31) have intimated that 400/220kV 315MVA

Autotransformer at Pune (Maharashtra) and 400/220kV 315MVA

Autotransformer at Raipur (Chattisgarh) have been received and are available for

intended use from 29.06.2012, in line with agreement reached in 15th WRPC

meeting on procurement of spare transformers and reactors in WR. Accordingly,

the monthly transmission charges for above spare transformers will be payable

from 01st July 2012 by concerned DICs as per CERC (sharing of interstate

transmission charges and losses) Regulation 2010.

PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I:COMML:NGP:21 dated 30.07.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex.-8.32) have intimated that 400kV 80MVAR Shunt reactor at

Wardha (Maharashtra) have been received and are available for intended use

from 30.07.2012, in line with agreement reached in 15th WRPC meeting on

procurement of spare transformers and reactors in WR. Accordingly, the monthly


Page

23

transmission charges for above spare reactor will be payable from 01st August

2012 by concerned DICs as per CERC (sharing of interstate transmission charges

and losses) Regulation 2010.

MPPMCL vide letter No. 05-01/GG/1566 dated 14.08.2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex.-8.33) have intimated that the matter was first put up in the TCC meeting

held on 18th August 2010, in which in-principle approval was accorded for

procurement of 4 nos. of spare ICTs and 2 nos reactor. TCC recommended that

these assets may be procured through PSDF. It was also proposed that in case the

expenditure does not materialize through PSDF then the cost will be pooled in

the ratio applicable for sharing of regional transmission charges till the time it is

used by some state. The date for which any State started using the transformer

and reactor, than the concerned State utility would bear the charges for the same.

The matter was later put up and discussed in 14th and 15th WRPC meeting also.

Further M/s POWERGRID has not informed anything about financing of spare

transformer and reactor through PSDF or otherwise. POWERGRID has also not

submitted any petition for determination of transmission tariff by the Central

Commission. Under such circumstances it may not be feasible for our company

as a beneficiary State to share the transmission charges, which have not yet been

decided, along with the PoC charges payable under CERC (sharing of Inter State

Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulation 2010.

It was intimated that the matter was discussed in the 15th WRPC meeting

wherein it was decided that the expenditure of procurement of spare

transformers and reactors be met from PSDF or through normal process, and

therefore the monthly transmission charges for above spare transformer and

reactor will be payable by all DICs from the respective dates declared by

POWERGRID.

8.4 : PGCIL vide letter No. WR-II/VDR/COML/4363 dated 02/04.07.2012 (copy

enclosed at Annex.-8.4) have intimated that 765kV, 3*80MVAR Bus reactor

along with associated bays at 765/400kV Satna Substation under ATS of SASAN

UMPP has been charged successfully. Same has been put into

regular/commercial operation in Western Region w.e.f. 01.07.2012. Accordingly,


Page

24

the monthly transmission charges for above transmission element will be payable

by all concerned from 01st July 2012.


enclosed at Annex.-8.5) have intimated that 765kV S/C Seoni-Bina Transmission

Line along with associated bays and 3*80MVAR reactors at both ends under

ATS for SASAN UMPP has been charged and synchronised successfully. Same

has been put into regular/commercial operation in Western Region w.e.f.

01.07.2012. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges for above

transmission element will be payable by all concerned from 01st July 2012.


enclosed at Annex.-8.6) have intimated that 765kV, 3*333MVA ICT I along

with associated bays at 765/400kV Satna Substation under SASAN UMPP has

been charged and synchronised successfully. Same has been put into

regular/commercial operation in Western Region w.e.f. 01.07.2012. Accordingly,

the monthly transmission charges for above transmission element will be payable

by all concerned from 01st July 2012.


enclosed at Annex.-8.7) have intimated that 765kV S/C Satna-Bina Ckt-II

Transmission line along with associated bays and 3*80 MVAR reactors at both

ends under SASAN UMPP has been charged and synchronised successfully.

Same has been put into regular/commercial operation in Western Region w.e.f.


transmission element will be payable by all concerned from 01st July 2012.

8.8 : PGCIL vide letter No. WRTS-I: COMML:NGP:23 dated 31.07.2012 (copy enclosed

at Annex.-8.8) have intimated that 765/400kV, 1500MVA ICT-III at Bilaspur

Pooling (Near Sipat) S/S along with associated bays under WRSS-XI has been

put into regular operation in WR and the same will be under commercial

operation w.e.f. 01.08.2012. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges for

above transmission systems will be payable from 01st August 2012 by all

concerned DICs as per CERC (sharing of inter-state transmission charges &

losses) Regulation 2010.


Page

25


enclosed at Annex.-8.9) have intimated that 400/220kV GIS Navsari S/S along

with 63 MVAR Bus Reactor at Navsari, Ckt-II of 400kV D/C Gandhar-Navsari

T/L with associated bays at Gandhar and Navsari end, 1x315 MVA 400/220kV

ICT-II along with associated 400kV and 220kV bays at Navsari, LILO of both

circuits of 220kV D/C Kawas-Navsari T/L at 400/220kV GIS substation at

Navsari under MUNDRA UMPP Regional Transmission System have been

commissioned and put into commercial operation w.e.f. 01.08.2012.

Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges for above transmission systems

will be payable by all concerned from 01st August 2012.


enclosed at Annex.-8.10) have intimated that 400kV D/C Surajbari-Jetpur part of

400kV D/C Mundra-Jetpur transmission line along with associated bays at Jetpur

(GETCO) S/S have been put into regular operation in WR w.e.f.01.09.2012 as

per CEA approval vide letter Ref.No.: 26/10/2012/SP&PA/865.866 dated


transmission systems will be payable by all concerned from 01st September 2012.


enclosed at Annex.-8.11) have intimated that two nos of 400/220kV, 315MVA

spare transformer have been procured at 400kV Jabalpur S/S and 400kV Dehgam

S/S under “Provision for spare ICTs & Reactors for Eastern, Northern, Southern

and Western Region” and the same have been put into commercial operation in

WR w.e.f.01.09.2012. Accordingly, the monthly transmission charges for above

transmission systems will be payable by all concerned from 01st September 2012.


enclosed at Annex.-8.12) have intimated that the 3x333MVA, 765/400kV

transformer-1 along with associated bays at 765/400kV Bina S/S has been

charged and synchronised successfully. The same has been put into

regular/commercial operation in WR w.e.f.01.09.2012. Accordingly, the monthly

transmission charges for above transmission systems will be payable by all

concerned from 01st September 2012.


Page

26


enclosed at Annex.-8.13) have intimated that the 3x333MVA, 765/400kV

transformer-II along with associated bays at 765/400kV Satna S/S has been

charged and synchronised successfully. The same has been put into





enclosed at Annex.-8.14) have intimated that the 1x315MVA, 400/220kV ICT-I

along with associated 400kV and 220kV bays at Navsari under Mundra Regional

Transmission System have been commissioned and have been put into





ITEM No. 9: Grant of MTOA and LTOA by POWERGRID.

The list of LTOAs/MTOAs received from NLDC and applicable from the month of

August-12 for computation of RTA is enclosed at Annex-9.

The intimation letters for grant of connectivity and LTA/MTOA received from

POWERGRID during the period April to August 2012 is available at WRPC web site

along with the agenda.

Committee noted. ITEM No.10: Energy transaction between WR & SR.

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that SRPC vide letter SRPC/SE-

I/2011/8478-79 dtd. 25.10.2011 have indicated amount payable/receivable on various

energy transactions done during October 2001 to December 2002 between WR and SR.

WR Constituents were requested vide WRPC letter No WRPC/Comml-I/4/Corr/2011-

1750 Dtd. 11.01.2011 to intimate the status on liquidation of dues.

In the 60th CCM it was observed that in the statement forwarded by SR, receivable by

SR is only indicated, SR needed to indicate payable by them too. He requested WRPC to


Page

27

take up the matter with SR. Committee further felt that WR constituents may work out

their dues and forward the same to WRPC at the earliest. The views expressed by

members in the 60th CCM were communicated to SRPC vide letter No. WRPC/Comml-

I/ABTREA/2012/330 Dtd.19.03.2012.

A separate meeting of WRPC/WRPC constituents with SRPC/ SRPC constituents was

held on 10.04.2012 at WRPC Mumbai wherein following decisions were taken:

1) It was decided that the period of amounts payable/receivable from October 2001to

December 2002 be divided into three time frames viz. Outstanding upto August

2001(during this period Maharashtra was nodal agency for WR & Andhra Pradesh

was nodal agency for SR), September 2001 to July 2002(during this period

transactions took place bilaterally) and August 2002 to December 2002 (during this

period transactions took place through PTC).

2) Upto August 2001 when Maharashtra & AP were nodal agencies for WR & SR

respectively, letter No. PR-3/SREB/0110961 dated 26.03.2002 of MSEB was

circulated giving the status of the payable/receivable account in respect of WR-SR

transactions for reconciliation. It was informed by AP representative that the

account was reconciled in 2005 with MSEB and the signed reconciled statement is

available with them. The same would be made available within a fortnight to other

constituents. The signed statement of MSEB will be treated as final settled

statement for that period.

GUVNL representative informed that the accounts between MSEB & Gujarat for

the above period have been settled bilaterally.

Pondicheri representative informed that there is no due (payable or receivable) to be

settled for the above period by Pondichery.

AP representative informed that they had paid Rs 19.44Corore reflected as

receivable (confirmation required).

It was decided that the settlement of accounts for the period be taken up from

these signed reconciled account statement.

3) For the period October 2001 to August 2002.


Page

28

GUVNL representative informed that an excess amount of Rs 10, 57,227/- had been

paid by GUVNL to TNEB. TNEB agreed for the same and agreed to take care of

this amount in final settlement.

Pondichery representative informed that the data of GUVNL is not matching with

their data for Nov.2001(import energy not matching) and May-2002 (export energy

data not matching). GUVNL representative informed that they would check the

data.

4) PTC was the nodal agency for the period August 2002 to December 2002. It was

felt that PTC be involved to resolve the settlement of transactions took place during

the above period. Tamil Nadu representative furnished the details of payment of

@32lakhs made to PTC which were required to be paid by PTC to MP. However

MP representative told that they have not received the amount.

After settlement, the balance amount was required to be passed on to Power Grid

towards reduction in transmission charges of respective regions. It is therefore

required to confirm with PTC whether the balance amount left out with PTC was

passed to Power Grid.

5) Status of accounts prepared by individual constituents was circulated during the

meeting.

6) Constituents were requested to cross check the data (their consolidated data in

respect of payables/receivables with their counterpart’s data). In case the accounts

do not tally with the counterparts the details of such payable receivable be compiled

by respective constituents and sent the same to WRPC and SRPC, so that the

figures regarding payables and receivables would be firmed in the next meeting to

be held in May 2012.

A meeting was held on 16th July 2012 at SRPC Bangalore copy of the record notes

is enclosed at Annex.-10.1. As decided during the meeting a copy of the revised REA

for the month of November 2001 was forwarded to SRPC.



Page

29

ITEM No. 11: Transmission charges and Transmission Losses on account of 400kV

line of M/s JPL :

Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that CSPTCL vide letter No. 03-

02/SLDC/RA/CCM/1253 dated 16.08.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-11.1) have

intimated that Inter State Transmission license granted to M/s JPL for its 400kV JPL

Tamnar-Raipur D/C line has not the approved YTC so far therefore losses of these lines

should not be loaded to the constituent of WR Pool. Further it has requested that the

metering point of these lines should be at 400kV PGCIL Raipur and not at Tamnar end.

Reply of POSOCO vide letter POSOCO/Market Operation/Trans Pricing dated

10.07.2012 is enclosed at Annex.-11.2.

GUVNL representative informed that the connectivity to JSPL (DCPP) has been granted

at 220kV Tamnar S/S switchyard which is the interface point of ISTS after granting of

ISTS status to the 400kV Raipur-Tamnar line and 400/220kV Tamnar S/S and granting

transmission licence to JPL. The metering of JSPL (DCPP) is being done at generating

transformer of JSPL (DCPP), therefore the tie line losses of JSPL (DCPP) to 220kV

Tamnar S/S are being pooled in WR.

Committee opnied that the metering of JSPL be done at the interface point of grant of

connectivity to JSPL (DCPP).

ITEM No.12. Metering schemes for Mauda and Vindhyachal Stage IV:

NTPC vide letter No. 01:CD.203 dated 01.05.2012 have intimated that WRLDC vide

letter dated 03rd feb.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-12.1) had communicated their

observations on the metering and accounting arrangement at NTPC- Vindhyachal Stage-

IV. NTPC vide its letter dated 16.02.2012 had clarified to WRLDC that the scheme as

proposed by NTPC and as agreed during 60th CCM, may be considered by WRLDC for

implantation.

In the 61st CCM, WRLDC intimated that the metering arrangements are examined by

them as per the metering guidelines of CEA and the details of the arrangement is

intimated to WRPC when the unit is first time synchronised with the grid. The same is

made available by WRPC in the UI account of the respective week.


Page

30

NTPC vide letter No.01: CD: 203 dated 25.05.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-12.2)

have also insisted that the issue of metering and accounting arrangement at Vindhyachal

Stage-I and Mauda stations be included for discussion and finalization in the WRPC

meetings.

In the 20th WRPC meeting It was clarified that as per IEGC clause 2.3.2(d), Metering and

data collection requirements is the exclusive function of WRLDC and accordingly it is to

be done by them.

GUVNL representative stated that though finalisation of the metering and accounting

scheme for new generating stations is exclusive responsibility of WRLDC, the

beneficiaries of the generating stations are stake holders and finalisation of such metering

and accounting schemes be put up in CCM for information/ observations.

NTPC requested that the metering and accounting arrangement for Mauda-I and

Vindhyachal IV may be made available by WRPC in UI accounts.

WRLDC informed that Mauda-I & Vindhyachal IV station at this moment is drawing

power from the grid and the drawal by the station is being communicated to WRPC for

accounting. The details of implemented metering and accounting scheme for the

stations would be intimated by them to WRPC before station start injecting into the

grid. Accounting arrangement for Mauda‐I and Vindhyachal IV would be made available by

WRLDC to WRPC for inclusion in UI account.

Committee opined that from the point of view of transparency WRLDC may put up the

metering and accounting arrangement after finalization at their end before the CCM.

ITEM No. 13: Control area jurisdiction of M/s Jaypee Bina Power Ltd. from

WRLDC to SLDC, MP

WRLDC vide WRLDC/MO-I/1551/12/722 dated: 11th Sept, 2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex.-13) has intimated that in line with clause 6.4.2(iii) & (iv) of IEGC-2010, the

control area jurisdiction of M/s Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant has been shifted from

WRLDC, Mumbai to SLDC, MP wef 3rd September 2012.



Page

31

Item.No.14: Scheduling of 25% power from Rajghat Hydro Power Project to UPPCL

WRLDC vide WRLDC/MO-I/1551/12/722 dated: 11th Sept, 2012 (copy enclosed at

Annex.-13) has intimated that as per the Hon’ble CERC’s order dated 21st Aug’2012 in

petition.no.45/2010, scheduling of 25% power generated from Rajghat Hydro Power

Plant to UP is started wef 8th Sept’2012. The procedure for scheduling of power from

Rajghat Hydro Power Project as per the directions of Hon’ble CERC intimated by

WRLDC POSOCO vide letter No.WRLDC/OS/1667/2010/7012 dated 04.09.2012 is

enclosed at Annex.-13.1.


Item No.15: Requirement of SEMs for Western region up to 2014

WRLDC has tentatively arrived the requirement of Special Energy Meters for Western

Region, as per the commissioning status available from CTU, POWERGRID for the

calendar year 2013 & 2014.The detailed location wise details are given at Annex-14. The

summary of requirement of SEMs and DCS are as follows.

Items No. of Main meters

No. of stand-by/Check meters

Total No of SEMs/DCDs

Total No. of SEMs required 268 71 308 Spares @20% 62 Net Total 370 Total No. of DCDs required 26 Spares @20% 5 Net Total 31 TYPE OF METER Model-A


ITEM No. 16: Reconciliation of UI and REC accounts.

WRLDC vide its letter dated 11th July 2012 ( Copy enclosed at Annex-13) has requested

all UI pool members of Western Region to reconcile the UI& REC account maintained

by WRLDC for the period from Apr’12-June’12, as per the details of payments/receipts


Page

32

during Apr’12 to June’12 uploaded on WRLDC website

(www.wrldc.com/commercial/Pool Reconciliation) by 30th July 2012. Some of the

utilities like M/s ACBIL, M/s BALCO have done reconciliation. Since considerable time

has been given for reconciliation and others have not responded, the statements for

Apr12-June12 uploaded in WRLDC web site stands reconciled.

GM WRLDC requested pool members for reconciliation of UI and REC accounts for the

quarter July to September 2012 by 31st October 2012.

Committee felt that the UI and REC accounts be deemed to have been reconciled.

ITEM No.17: Status of LC opening toward UI payments. The Hon’ble CERC in its order dated 22nd Aug’12 in petition.No.172/Suo-Motu/2012,

shown their displeasure for not complying the provisions of UI regulation w.r.t to opening

of LCs towards UI payments as per clause 10(4) of Central Electricity Regulatory

Commission (Unscheduled Interchange charges and related matters) Regulation 2009, as

amended from time to time. WRLDC’s letter dated 9th Aug’12, requesting the defaulting

entities to open the LC is enclosed as Annex-II. The LC to be opened by WR entities for

the FY 2012-13 is given below.

Sl No.

WR Entity who have to open LC

No. of times UI payment was delayed ( From 01-Apr-11 to 31-Mar-12)

No of weeks in which UI payable

Average payable weekly UI (Rs in lakhs)

LC Amount (Rs in lakhs)

Remarks

1 CSPDCL 2 36 1037 1141

2 MP Power Management Co. Ltd

20 23 1259 1385

3 GOA 5 25 103 113

4 DNH 14 20 238 262 LC opened

5 D&D 18 18 130 143 LC opened

6 JINDAL POWER 12 33 183 201 LC

opened 7 LANCO 2 6 193 212

8 *Jaypee Bina Thermal Power Plant

6 7 0.85 0.94


Page

33

9

**Essar MAHAN Thermal Power Plant

8 16 13 14.3

* Control area of Jaypee Bina TPS shifted to SLDC, MP wef 3rd Sept’2012 ** Essar MAHAN TPP Defaulted in current FY 2012-13 in 9th week (21-27.05.12).

GM WRLDC requested MPPMCL, GOA, LANCO and Essar Mahan for early opening of

LCs.

Committee requested MPPMCL, GOA, LANCO and Essar Mahan representatives for

early opening of LCs.

ITEM No.18: Status of UI and REC charges payable/receivable to UI pool account. 18.1: Status of UI charge payable/Receivable to UI Pool account as on 10th Sept’2012

(+) Payable / (-) Receivable from Pool Amount in Rs.

Entity Total dues Payments overdue

Principal Principal CSPDCL -27,518,064 MP Power Management Co. ltd. -556,568,721 GETCO -1,609,151,187 MSEDCL -314,910,836 Goa -9,661,947 D&D -26,365,171 DNH -189,077,414 NTPC -1,437,121,920 NR Exchange 5,387,542,728 5,441,893,802 SR Exchange 12,077,158 ER Exchange 4,580,662,594 4,655,358,779 JINDAL POWER -32,657,963 HVDC V'chal -1,199,040 HVDC B'vati -4,243,349 Lanco Power Ltd -380,780,201 NSPCL -31,602,623 ACB India Ltd. 6,139,716 RGPPL -2,207,637 BALCO -20,545,998 CGPL UMPP MUNDRA -462,654,583


Page

34

DCPP JSPL -25,005,721 JAYPEE BINA TPP -34,323,639 Essar (MAHAN) TPP 2,120,400 Differential amount from capping due to injn. >105% -314,065,768 Amount aroused from additional UI -585,646,187 Amount aroused from capping on Over Injn. and under drawal -3,941,788,583 Net Total in capping & Addl. UI A/c -112,185,761 Note : This includes : 1. UI Accounts issued up to 22nd week of 2012-13 ie. .20.08.12 to 26.08.12. 2. UI Payments received up to 03.09.12 and distributed up to 03.09.12


Item.No.18.2: : Status of REC payable/Receivable to UI Pool account as on 11th Sept’2012 Status of Reactive Energy Charges Payable to REC Pool Account

(+) Payable / (-) Receivable from pool Amount in Rs Entity Total dues Payments overdue Principal Principal CSPDCL -3,18,87,910 -2,61,31,456 MPPTCL 1,35,04,406 1,33,58,645 GETCO -1,95,46,535 -1,65,78,680 MSEDCL 50,55,400 -29,83,609 Goa -6,96,506 -6,28,779 DD 94,85,368 89,54,332 DNH 3,02,19,232 2,85,26,783 TOTAL 61,33,455 45,17,236

Note : This includes : 1. REC Accounts issued up to 22nd week of 2012-13 ie.,20.08.2012 to 26.08.2012 2. REC Payments distributed up to 11.09.12 *When Receivables are more than payable, total of all receivables made equal to payable. *When all are receivable, all receivables made zero.



Page

35

ITEM No.19: Other Items: 19.1 : Operationalisation of “W3” Bid Area. Superintending Engineer (Comml.) stated that, WRLDC vide letter No. WRLDC/MO-

II/2012 dated 13.09.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.-19.11) have intimated that as per

communication from NLDC, a new bid area named “W3” will be put into operation from

18.09.20012. NLDC has already displayed TTC/ATC of W3 exporting zone on their web

site. The area covers the utilities of Korba NTPC, Sipat NTPC, all generating and

Discoms of Chattisgarh control area, BALCO, NSPCL, JPL, JSPCL, ACBIL, LANCO

and Sterlite.

Members deliberated on the issue.

CSPTCL representative raised concern on the formation of the W3 bid area by NLDC and

opined whether NLDC is empowered to demarcation/creation of bid area.

Communication received from CSPTCL vide letter MD/CSPTCL/Tech.Cell/565 dated

06.10.2012 (copy enclosed at Annex.19.12).

JPL representative stated that due to creation of this bid area the generators in this area

are unable to trade trough power exchanges due to lesser transmission margins.

GM WRLDC stated that since scheduling of the trade on Power Exchange platform is

being done by NLDC and creation of the bid area might have been done as per the

provisions of the regulations and instead of discussion on this issue members may explore

how to deal this issue by making available extra transmission margins for power trading

through Power Exchanges by optimising utilization of the transmission lines in the

corridor which are otherwise out due to system constraints.

Committee felt that separate meeting may be arranged on 19.10.2012 and NLDC

representative may be invited for discussion to understand various issues involved in

“W3” bid area formation.

19.2 : MOU for CPPs in WR in case of Black Start Recovery after a Grid Disturbance.

Member Secretary-I/C WRPC stated that, WRLDC vide letter No. AGM/WRLDC/12/617

dated 04.10.2012(copy of letter along with draft MOU enclosed) has intimated that in line

with the minutes of the meeting taken by Member (GO&D) on 28th August 2012, a draft

MOU has been prepared by WRLDC so as to ensure that there is no commercial issue

raised by any utility including CPP’s in WR in case of Black start Recovery after a grid


Page

36

disturbance. The matter was also discussed in the Operation sub-Committee, wherein it

was decided that the matter be referred to Commercial sub-Committee.

GM WRLDC gave a brief background on the need for signing the MOU by management

of utilities of WR region with CPPs under their control area for early recovery in the

event of Grid Failure.

Committee felt that separate meeting may be arranged on 19.10.2012 and

representatives of CPPs in the region having installed capacity of 100MW and above

may be invited for discussion.

19.3 : Metering of HVDC Mundra-Mahendragad

GUVNL representative intimated that the pheriperial metering provided at

Mahendragad S/S for accounting drawal/injection of Gujarat is registering the circular

power flow of NR through these lines and thereby resulting in incorrect recording of

power by this metering arrangement.

ITEM No.20: Date and venue of next meeting

The date and venue of the next meeting will be intimated separately.

* * * * *

Annexure- 1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

62nd CCM OF WRPC HELD ON 8th October, 2012 AT NTPC, MUMBAI

I GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED 1. Shri K.P. Jangid, GM(Comml.) 2. Shri P. J. Jani, EE(CSP) 3. Shri H.G. Modi, JE

II GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.

1. Shri N.N.Shaikh, EE(SLDC) 2. Shri Y.J. Gamit, DE(Comml.) SLDC

III CHHATTISGARH POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD.

1. Shri G.C. Mukharjee, CE(Comml) IV CHHATTISGARH POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD.

1. Shri B. R. Soni, SE(LD) 2. Shri Girish Gupta, EE(LD)

V MADHYA PRADESH POWER MANAGEMENT CO. LTD.

1. Shri Pramod Choudhary, AGM 2. Shri M.P. Chincholkar, SE(Comml) 3. Shri A.S. Raghuwanshi, DGM

VI MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.

1. Shri A. S. Chavan, CE(PP)

VII MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION CO. LTD. 1. Shri B.H. Gujrathi, SE, SLDC 2. Shri Jayant Kulkarni, EE, SLDC

VIII DADRA NAGAR HAVELI, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT 1. Shri H.C. Surma, Dy.EE

IX POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.

1. Shri C. M. Verghese, AGM(Comml.), WRTS-I X POWER SYSTEM OPERATION CORPORATION

1. Shri P. Pentayya, GM, WRLDC 2. Shri A. Gartia, DGM, WRLDC 3. Shri K. Murlikrishna, Chief Manager, WRLDC 4. Smt. S. Usha, Chief Manager, WRLDC

XI NTPC LTD.

1. Shri S.S. Sen, GM 2. Shri Anil Nautiyal, AGM(Comml.) 3. Shri E.P. Rao, AGM 4. Shri H. Harchandani, AGM (Comml.) 5. Smt.Suchitra Maggon, AGM(Comml) 6. Shri Amitabh Kumar, DGM 7. Shri Oswald Menezes, DGM

XII RATNAGIRI GAS POWER PVT. LTD.

1. Shri B. M. Gulati, AGM (Comml.) 2. Shri A.S.Pandey DGM

XIII TORRENT POWER LTD.

1. Shri M. H. Kshatriya, GM XIV NARMADA CONTROL AUTHORITY

1. Shri Hemant Pandey. EE XV NSPC LTD.

1. Shri G. Basu, GM(Cp. & Comml.) XVI JINDAL POWER LTD.

1. Shri R. C. Gupta, CPC XVII LANCO KONDAPALLI POWER LTD.

1. Shri Rakesh K. Gupta, COO XVIII CGP LTD.

1. Shri B.K. Mohanty, DGM 2. Shri R.M. Shankhe, DGM 3. Shri Nitin Chunarkar Manager

XIX WESTERN REGIONAL POWER COMMITTEE

1. Shri S.D.Taksande, Member Secretary I/c 2. Shri O. P. Singh, Suptdg.Engineer (Comml) 3. Shri Deepak Gawali, Executive Engineer (Comml) 4. Shri P.D.Lone, Executive Engineer (Comml)

government of india - wrpcwrpc.gov.in/ccm/62ccm_minute.pdfminutes of the 62nd commercial committee...

Documents