govind front page 1 - inflibnetshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/8402/11/11... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Sorption of CO, CH4, and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5
with Different SiO2/Al2O3 Ratio
Chapter 5
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
143
5.1. Introduction
Gas separation using porous adsorbents like zeolites, activated carbon, and carbon
molecular sieve potentially offers a cost-effective and environmentally friendly
option.1-14
Adsorption based separation technique has been widely used in different
industries for the purification, separation and recovery of different gases from their
gas mixtures.15-19
NaZSM-5 has been used for gas separation applications, while
proton type HZSM-5 has been extensively used in acid catalyzed reactions.20-26
Adsorption properties of ZSM-5 based adsorbents can be influenced by their
SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and chemical composition. ZSM-5 can be synthesized with a broad
range of SiO2/Al2O3 ratio ranging from 10 to ∞.
Zeolite ZSM-5 was first synthesized by Mobile Company in 1972, and showed two
different crystal faces depending on the temperature of crystallization; and each phase
presents different secondary building units (SBUs). Figure 5.1 shows the construction
of ZSM-5. At low temp ZSM-5 crystallizes in a monoclinic system with SBUs
formed by 24 tetrahedra, while at high temperature it presents an orthorhombic lattice
with a SBUs of 12 tetrahedra. The phase transition takes place at 340 K. The
arrangement of these pentasil subunits (SBUs) in one dimension generates sinusoidal
chains. Repeating chains in one plane produces a 10 member ring and finally the
superposition of planes generates the three dimensional structure, which is
characterized by two channel systems one straight and another one sinusoidal. 21,24,27
Figure 5.1. Schematic presentation for the construction of ZSM-5 framework.
Separation of CH4, CO2, and N2 by adsorption on carbon molecular sieve and zeolite
13X has been reported by Cavenati et al.10
The layered pressure swing adsorption
consist of a zeolite 13X to selectively removes CO2, and followed by a layer of
carbon molecular sieve 3K to separate CH4 from N2. Adsorption equilibrium of CO2,
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
144
CH4 and N2 onto Na and H-mordenite at high pressures has been reported by Delgado
et al.28
, Harlick et al.29
have studied pure and binary mixture adsorption of CO2, CH4,
and N2 on HZSM-5 having SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 30 and found that CH4+N2 binary
isotherms exhibit behaviour similar to the pure component isotherms, with CH4 as the
dominant adsorbate. The separation factor steadily declines as the mole fraction of
CH4 in the gas phase increased. Yun et al.30
carried out experimental evaluation of
methods for the prediction of adsorption equilibrium of CH4, ethane, and their binary
mixtures in MCM-41. High pressure CH4 adsorption in NaX, NaY and clinoptilolite
zeolites with different SiO2/Al2O3 was studied.31-33
Two different coordination modes
of CO in Na-ZSM-5 zeolites, the formation of Na+ → CO and Na
+ → OC adducts
between adsorbed CO and extra-framework Na+ ions have also been reported.
34 CO,
CH4 and N2 adsorption on zeolite ZSM-5 has been studied by few researchers but a
systematic study on effect of SiO2/Al2O3 alumina ratio on adsorption properties of
CO, CH4 and N2 in zeolite ZSM-5 has not been reported yet. 27, 35-36
In present chapter, we have studied the CO, CH4, and N2 adsorption on ZSM-5 having
different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio, by both volumetric equilibrium and dynamic adsorption.
Volumetric adsorption measurements of CO, CH4 and N2 up to 1 atm pressure and
288 K and 303 K were carried out while dynamic adsorption studies are carried out
for CO, CH4 and N2 binary and ternary gas mixtures with different composition and at
fixed flow rate of 100 ml/min.
5.2. Experimental Section
5.2.1. Materials
The sodium form of ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio 25, 40, 100, 400 and 900 in
powder form were procured from Zeochem, Switzerland and is used as received.
ZSM-5 (25), ZSM-5 (40), ZSM-5 (100), ZSM-5 (400) and ZSM-5 (900) represent
ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 25, 40, 100, 400 and 900, respectively. For preparing
zeolite extrudes, 20 wt% Bentonite clay was used as binder. The average length and
diameter of extrudes is 5 mm and 3 mm, respectively. N2 (99.999%), CH4 (99.9%),
CO (99.99%) and He (99.999%) from Inox Air Products, India were used for the
adsorption isotherm measurements.
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
145
5.2.2. Characterization
X-ray powder diffraction, Surface Area, SEM, EDX, and ICP analysis of zeolite
ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios were carried out by the same procedure as
described in chapter 2 section 2.2.3, 2.2.5 and 2.2.6.
5.2.3. Equilibrium and Dynamic Adsorption Measurements
Equilibrium and dynamic adsorption measurements of the zeolite ZSM-5 with
different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios were carried out for obtaining equilibrium and dynamic
adsorption capacity and selectivity of CO, CH4, and N2 from their mixtures. The
detail procedure is same as described in section 2.2.7 and 2.2.8.
5.3. Results and Discussion
5.3.1. Structure of ZSM-5
The structure, unit cell, and pore opening of ZSM-5 are shown in figure 5.2. ZSM-5
has a three-dimensional network structure with straight channels of dimension 5.3
5.6 Å viewed along [010] plane and sinusoidal channels of dimension 5.1 5.5 Å
viewed along [100] plane. The sinusoidal channels connect subsequent layers of
straight channels. The unit cell of ZSM-5 is orthorhombic with dimension 20.07
19.92 13.42 Å. 36
Zeolite ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 25, 40, 100, 400 and 900
possess 7.11, 4.57, 1.88, 0.48 and 0.22 sodium cations/unit cell, respectively. The
pore opening and channel structure of ZSM-5 is large enough to neglect any steric
effects of the studied adsorbate molecules within the adsorbent channels. However,
the cationic number and nature of the adsorbent surface predominantly determines the
difference in adsorption capacity of CO, CH4 and N2.
Figure 5.2 (a-d). Schematic presentation of (a) ZSM-5 Structure, (b) unit cell of ZSM-5 (c),
10-ring viewed along [100] and (d) 10-ring viewed along [010] plane.
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
146
5.3.2. X-ray Powder Diffraction and Surface Area Measurements
X-ray diffraction pattern of ZSM-5 samples having different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio is
shown in Figure 5.3. These are indicative of highly crystalline material typically
observed for ZSM-5 type zeolite. The chemical composition and surface area of
ZSM-5 samples with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio are given in Table 5.1.
Figure 5.3. XRD pattern of ZSM-5 having different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio.
Table 5.1. Physicochemical properties of ZSM-5 having different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio.
Adsorbent Composition
(Anhydrous wt %)
Surface area,
(m2/g)
Average
particle
size, (μm) Na2O Al2O3 SiO2 Micropore External
ZSM-5 (25) 3.75 6.12 90.16 243 124 3.8
ZSM-5 (40) 2.41 3.97 93.61 251 103 4.5
ZSM-5(100) 1.0 1.65 97.35 217 145 2.4
ZSM-5(400) 0.26 0.42 99.32 219 94 4.7
ZSM-5(900) 0.12 0.19 99.69 182 122 4.0
The external surface in the ZSM-5 could be due to the size of the crystals/particles
among the samples studied. The particle size distribution for ZSM-5 with different
SiO2/Al2O3 ratio was analyzed by particle size analyzer Malvern Mastersizer 2000,
operated at air pressure 1 bar and feed rate 50. ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 25,
40, 100, 400 and 900 describe as dry powder have average particle size of 3.8, 4.5,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0
ZSM5-900
ZSM5-400
ZSM5-100
ZSM5-40
ZSM5-25
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
2 Theta
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
147
2.4, 4.7 and 4.0 μm, respectively. The observed differences in external surface area
for the samples correlate with the size variation as seen from Table 5.1. The samples
with small particle size show larger surface area.
5.3.3. Adsorption Isotherms, Capacity and Selectivity for ZSM-5 with Different
SiO2/Al2O3 Ratio
The adsorption isotherms for CO, CH4, and N2 in ZSM-5 having different SiO2/Al2O3
ratio, at 288 K and 303 K are shown in Figures 5.4 and 5.5 respectively. The
adsorption isotherms of CO, CH4 and N2 on ZSM-5 samples follow the Type I
isotherm which become linear with increase in SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. The adsorption
isotherm shows CH4 selectivity over N2 at all partial pressure and over CO at higher
partial pressure. However, the low silica ZSM-5 (25) and ZSM-5(40) shows CO
selectivity over CH4 and N2 in low pressure region. The pure component adsorption
selectivity data of CO over N2 and CH4 over CO & N2 for zeolite ZSM-5 with
different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio at 288 and 303 K are given in Table 5.2 and 5.3,
respectively. The selectivity of CH4 over CO and N2 increases with increasing
SiO2/Al2O3 ratio because of weak interaction of CO and N2 with framework oxygen
atoms in comparison to that of CH4. The selectivity of CO over N2 decreases with
increase in SiO2/Al2O3 ratio.
The equilibrium adsorption capacities for the adsorption of CO, CH4, and N2 on
ZSM-5 having different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio are determined from the adsorption
isotherms and the number of molecules of CO, CH4, and N2 adsorbed per unit cell is
calculated (Table 5.2 and 5.3). The number of molecules adsorbed per unit cell is
calculated by multiplying volume of gas adsorbed and conversion factor given in
Table 5.2 and 5.3. It is observed that the adsorption capacities of CO, CH4, and N2
increases with decrease in SiO2/Al2O3 ratio in ZSM-5. The CH4 adsorption capacity
in ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratios ranging from 25 to 900 is higher compared to that of
CO and N2. CO adsorption capacity is higher compared to that of N2. The adsorption
capacities of ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 400 and 900 are nearly the same for all
the gases studied. As the number of cations per unit cell increases, the adsorption
capacity increases for all gases studied.
Adsorbate molecules can interact with the zeolite surface through lattice oxygen
atoms and accessible extra framework cations, Al and Si atoms. The Al and Si atoms
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
148
present at the centre of tetrahedra are not directly exposed to the sorbate molecules.
Consequently, their interactions with the sorbate molecules are negligible. Therefore,
the principal interactions of the sorbate molecules with the zeolite surface are with
lattice oxygen atoms and extra framework cations.
Figure 5.4 (a-e). Adsorption isotherms for ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios at 288 K
0 200 400 600 8000
2
4
6
8
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(a)
ZSM-5 (25)
0 200 400 600 8000
2
4
6
8
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(b)
ZSM-5 (40)
0 200 400 600 8000
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(c)
ZSM-5 (100)
0 200 400 600 8000
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(d)ZSM-5 (400)
0 200 400 600 8000
2
4
6
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(e)
ZSM-5 (900)
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
149
Figure 5.5 (a-e). Adsorption isotherms for ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios at 303 K
The electrostatic interactions between the sorbate molecules and the extra framework
cations of the zeolite depend on the quadrupole moments, dipole moment and
polarizability of the sorbate molecules.
0 200 400 600 8000
2
4
6
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(a) ZSM-5 (25)
0 200 400 600 8000
1
2
3
4
5
6
ZSM-5 (40)
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(b)
0 200 400 600 8000
1
2
3
4ZSM-5 (100)
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(c)
0 200 400 600 8000
1
2
3
4
ZSM-5 (400)
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(d)
0 200 400 600 8000
1
2
3
4
ZSM-5 (900)
Mo
lec
ule
s a
ds
orb
ed
/un
it c
ell
Pressure (mmHg)
CO
CH4
N2
(e)
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
150
The electrostatic interaction between gas molecules and extra framework sodium ions
is the main driving force for the adsorption of CO, CH4 and N2 in ZSM-5. The
quadrupole moment for the used gases is in the order of CO > N2 > CH4, while their
order of polarizability is CH4 > CO > N2. CO is polar in nature while CH4 and N2 are
non polar. With the decrease in number of sodium cations per unit cell, the
electrostatic interaction of CO, CH4 and N2 molecule decreases which results into the
decreases in the adsorption capacity of CO, CH4 and N2 in ZSM-5 on increasing
SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. Zeolite ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 25 shows maximum
adsorption capacity whereas ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 900 shows minimum
adsorption capacity for CO, CH4 and N2 at 760 mmHg and 288 and 303 K.
Table 5.2. Adsorption capacity and selectivity for CO, CH4 and N2 in ZSM-5 with
different SiO2/Al2O3 ratios at 288 K and 760 mmHg.
Adsorbents Conversio
n factor
Adsorption capacity
(molecules/u. c.)
Selectivity
CO CH4 N2 CH4/N2 CH4/CO CO/N2
ZSM-5(25) 0.2651 6.5 7.0 4.0 1.8 1.1 1.7
ZSM-5 (40) 0.2622 5.0 6.7 3.1 2.1 1.4 1.6
ZSM-5(100) 0.2592 3.8 4.8 2.3 2.1 1.3 1.7
ZSM-5(400) 0.2578 2.3 4.7 1.7 2.8 2.1 1.3
ZSM-5(900) 0.2574 2.0 4.6 1.6 2.9 2.2 1.3
Table 5.3. Adsorption capacity and selectivity for CO, CH4 and N2 in ZSM-5 with
different SiO2/Al2O3 at 303 K and 760 mmHg.
Adsorbents Conversio
n factor
Adsorption capacity
(molecules/u. c.)
Selectivity
CO CH4 N2 CH4/N2 CH4/CO CO/N2
ZSM-5(25) 0.2504 5.5 5.7 3 1.9 1.0 1.9
ZSM-5 (40) 0.2480 3.9 5.2 2.3 2.2 1.4 1.7
ZSM-5(100) 0.2456 2.7 3.6 1.7 2.1 1.3 1.5
ZSM-5(400) 0.2442 1.7 3.4 1.3 2.6 2.1 1.3
ZSM-5(900) 0.2439 1.5 3.1 1.2 2.6 2.0 1.4
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
151
CH4 has no quadrupole moment but has high polarizability (Table 1.1). Therefore,
when CH4 molecule is in close proximity to the cation, an instantaneous shift in the
time averaged neutral electrostatic field occurs in the structure of CH4. This induced
polarity results into the high adsorption capacity. However, with decrease in number
of cations per unit cell, the induced polarity of CH4 also reduces and hence the
adsorption capacity decreases. Therefore with the increase in SiO2/Al2O3 ratio the
total number of sodium cations decreases and hence the CH4 adsorption capacity
decreases. CH4 shows dispersion interaction potential with framework oxygen atoms
and hence CH4 molecules are homogenously distributed in ZSM-5 channels, while
CO and N2 molecules are located in proximately to the cations. However, in the case
of CO and N2, the adsorption is mainly governed by the electrostatic interaction
between N2 molecules and cations.
5.3.4. Adsorption Model Fitting
The adsorption data obtained at 288 and 303 K were fitted into Langmuir equation
and the values of the slope and the Langmuir constants for the adsorption of CO, CH4,
and N2 on different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of ZSM-5 at 303 K are given in Table 5.4. The
decrease in slope and Langmuir constant b for CO, CH4 and N2 with an increase in
SiO2/Al2O3 ratio is in agreement with the decrease in adsorption capacity.
Table 5.4. Langmuir constants and slope for adsorption of CO, CH4 and N2 at 303 K
on ZSM-5 having different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio.
Adsorbent Slope Langmuir constant (b)
CO CH4 N2 CO CH4 N2
ZSM-5(25) 0.089 0.069 0.024 3.041 1.970 0.854
ZSM-5(40) 0.065 0.054 0.019 2.453 1.386 0.917
ZSM-5(100) 0.032 0.044 0.012 1.902 1.859 0.534
ZSM-5(400) 0.012 0.024 0.008 0.604 0.546 0.277
ZSM-5(900) 0.010 0.022 0.007 0.247 0.492 0.257
The CO, CH4, and N2 adsorption data obtained at 303 K were also fitted in Virial
equation and the values for the Virial coefficient A and Henry’s constant K at 303 K
are given in Table 5.5. The Henry’s constant values for the adsorption of CO, CH4,
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
152
and N2 decrease in ZSM-5 with increase in the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. The value of Henry
constant for CO adsorption was higher than CH4 for low silica zeolite i.e. ZSM-5
(25), ZSM-5 (40), and ZSM-5 (100), while it is less for ZSM-5 (400), and ZSM-5
(900). The magnitudes of the values of Henry constants are higher for CO and CH4
compared to N2. The higher values of Henry constants confirm the strong interaction
of CO molecule with the sodium cations of the ZSM-5, while CH4 interacts with both
sodium ions and framework oxygen atoms. The ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 25
has the highest values for the Henry constants for the studied gases.
Table 5.5. Virial coefficient and Henry’s constant for adsorption of CO, CH4, and N2
at 303 K on ZSM-5 Having different SiO2/Al2O3 Ratio.
Adsorbent A Henry constant(K) (10-5
cc g-1
Pa-1
)
CO CH4 N2 CO CH4 N2
ZSM-5(25) 1.9 2.5 3.7 105 60.4 22.0
ZSM-5(40) 2.2 2.6 3.4 82 54.7 21.0
ZSM-5(100) 2.5 3.0 4.4 60 36.0 9.6
ZSM-5(400) 4.3 3.7 4.9 11 19.3 5.8
ZSM-5(900) 5.0 3.8 5.1 7 16.8 5.3
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
153
5.3.5. Isosteric Heat of adsorption
The isosteric heats of adsorption for CO, CH4 and N2 are given in Table 5.6. The heat
of adsorption decreases with an increase in the SiO2/Al2O3 ratio due to decrease in
numbers of sodium cations. The heat of adsorption was higher for CO than CH4 and
N2. The high heat of adsorption for CO in ZSM-5 is due to strong interaction of CO
molecules with sodium ions.
Table 5.6. Isosteric heat of adsorption for CO, CH4, and N2 on ZSM-5 with different
SiO2/Al2O3 ratio.
Adsorbent Isosteric heat of adsorption (kJ mol-1
)
CO CH4 N2
ZSM-5(25) 33 25.2 26.8
ZSM-5 (40) 30 22.8 25.3
ZSM-5(100) 28 22.5 23.2
ZSM-5(400) 25 19.8 19.0
ZSM-5(900) 23 20.2 19.5
5.3.6. Dynamic Adsorption Studies of CO and N2 from Binary Gas Mixtures
The breakthrough measurements for CO and N2 from binary gas mixture have been
carried out on ZSM-5 (25) at 303 K, 1 atm. pressure and feed flow of 100 ml/min.
The binary breakthrough data are given in Table 5.7. The CO + N2 binary adsorption
and desorption breakthrough curves are shown in Figure 5.6. The binary adsorption
study shows the CO selectivity over N2 in accordance with equilibrium selectivity. In
ZSM-5 (25) the breakthrough time of CO decreases while the dynamic capacity
increased with increasing CO percentage. This decrease in dynamic adsorption
capacity is due to decrease in partial pressure of CO. The adsorbed CO is easily
desorbed by counter current purging of N2 at 100 ml/min.
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
154
Figure 5.6 (a-d). Breakthrough curves for binary gas mixtures on ZSM-5 (25), (a) CO
(20%) + N2 (80%) (b) CO (12%) + N2 (88%) (c) CO (6%) + N2 (96%) (d) CO (1.6%) + N2
(98.4%).
Table 5.7. Breakthrough data for binary gas mixtures on ZSM-5 (25).
Adsorbent Feed gas
composition by
volume (± 1%)
Weight of
adsorbent
(g)
Breakthrough
time (min)
Dynamic
capacity
(cm3/g)
ZSM-5 (25) CO = 20
N2 = 80
45.3 9 4
ZSM-5 (25) CO = 12
N2 = 88
45.3 11 2.9
ZSM-5 (25) CO = 6
N2 = 94
45.3 13 1.7
ZSM-5 (25) CO = 1.6
N2 = 98.4
45.3 16 0.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
Vo
lum
e (
%)
Time (min)
CO Adsorption
CO Desorption
(d)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0
5
10
15
20
Vo
lum
e (
%)
Time (min)
CO Adsorption
CO Desorption
(a)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
3
6
9
12
Vo
lum
e (
%)
Time (min)
CO Adsorption
CO Desorption
(b)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0
2
4
6
Vo
lum
e (
%)
Time (min)
CO Adsorption
CO Desorption
(c)
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
155
5.3.7. Dynamic Adsorption Studies of CO, CH4, N2 from Ternary Gas Mixtures
The breakthrough measurements for CO + CH4 + N2 ternary gas mixture has been
carried out on ZSM-5 (400) at 303 K and 1 atm pressure and feed flow of 100ml/min.
The ternary breakthrough data are given in Table 5.8. The ternary adsorption and
desorption/breakthrough curves for CO (15%) + CH4 (70%) + N2 (15%) gas mixture
on ZSM-5 (400) are shown in Figure 5.7.
Figure 5.7 (a-b). Breakthrough adsorption/desorption curves for CO (15%) + CH4 (70%) +
N2 (15%) ternary gas mixture on ZSM-5 (400).
The dynamic adsorption studies showed that ZSM-5 (400) has CH4 selectivity over
CO & N2 and CO selectivity over N2. The increased concentration of CO in outlet
during adsorption was due to replacement of initially adsorbed CO with high affinity
CH4 molecules. The adsorbed CO is easily desorbed by counter current purging of N2
at 100 ml/min. We studied gas mixture with different composition (CH4 = 30-85%,
CO = 5-30% and N2 = 10-70%) and found that the breakthrough time is not affected
by change in concentration, while the dynamic adsorption capacity decreases with
decrease in CH4 % composition.
0 5 10 15 20 25
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Vo
lum
e (
%)
Time (min)
CO
CH4
N2
(a)
Adsorption
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Vo
lum
e (
%)
Time (min)
CO
CH4
N2
(b)
Desorption
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
156
Table 5.8. Breakthrough data for ternary gas mixtures on ZSM-5 (400).
Adsorbent Feed gas
composition
by volume (±
1%)
Weight of
adsorbent
(g)
CH4
Breakthrough
time (min)
CO
Breakthrough
time (min)
CH4
Dynamic
capacity
(cm3/g)
ZSM-5
(400)
CH4 = 85
CO = 05
N2 = 10
84 9 8 9.1
ZSM-5
(400)
CH4 = 70
CO = 15
N2 = 15
84 9 7 7.5
ZSM-5
(400)
CH4 = 50
CO = 30
N2 = 20
84 9 6 5.4
ZSM-5
(400)
CH4 = 70
CO = 10
N2 = 20
84 9 6 7.5
ZSM-5
(400)
CH4 = 50
CO = 10
N2 = 40
84 9 6 5.4
ZSM-5
(400)
CH4 = 30
CO = 10
N2 = 70
84 10 6 3.6
5.4. Conclusions
The adsorption capacity for CO, CH4 and N2 decreases with increase in the
SiO2/Al2O3 of ZSM-5 at 288 and 303 K. The percentage decrease in CO and N2
adsorption capacity is higher than that of CH4. The selectivity of CH4 over CO and N2
increased while selectivity of CO over N2 decreased with increase in SiO2/Al2O3.
ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 900 showed higher selectivity for CH4 over CO and
N2 whereas with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 25 it showed higher CO selectivity over N2. The
heat of adsorption for CO, CH4 and N2 decreased with increase in SiO2/Al2O3. The
high CH4 and CO adsorption capacity, selectivity and heat of adsorption for ZSM-5
with low SiO2/Al2O3 show stronger electrostatic interaction of CO and CH4 molecules
with sodium cations compared to those for high SiO2/Al2O3. The value of Henry’s
constant also confirms the result. With increase in the SiO2/Al2O3 the dispersion
interaction potential dominates and hence ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 400 and
900 shows higher value of Henry’s constant for CH4 than CO.
The adsorption capacities and selectivity for CO over N2 are very promising for ZSM-
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
157
5 (25) as an adsorbent for the CO separation from its mixture with N2. The adsorption
of binary and ternary gas mixtures of CH4, CO and N2 with different composition
showed selective adsorption of CH4 over CO and N2 and CO over N2 in adsorbent
column. In binary gas mixture the breakthrough time decreases and dynamic capacity
increases with increasing CO percentage. In the ternary gas mixture the CH4
breakthrough time was not decreases while dynamic adsorption capacity increases
with increase in CH4 percentage composition. The adsorbed CH4 and CO desorbed
completely under counter current N2 flow. Zeolite ZSM-5 (400) can be used as an
adsorbent for CH4 separation from its mixture with CO and N2, while ZSM-5 (25) can
be used for separating the CO and N2 gas mixture.
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
158
References:
1. Nakao, G.; Ishisaka, H.; Takamoto, S.; Nishimura, Y., U.S. Patent 1990,
4,950,462.
2. Cavenati, S.; Grande, C. A.; Rodrigues, A. E., J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2006, 49,
4, 1095.
3. Guest, J. E.; Williams, C. D., Chem. Commun. 2002, 2870.
4. Sudibandriyo, M.; Pan, Z.; James, E. F.; Robert, L. R.; Khaled, Langmuir.
2003, 19, 13, 5323.
5. Reid, C. R.; O’koye, I. P.; Thomas, K. M., Langmuir. 1998, 14, 9, 2415.
6. Grande, C. A.; Gigola, C.; Rodrigues, A. E., Adsorption. 2003, 9, 4, 321.
7. Cavenati, S.; Grande, C. A.; Rodrigues, A. E., Sep. Sci. Tech. 2005, 40, 13,
2721.
8. Dong, F.; Lou, H.; Kodama, A.; Goto, M.; Hirose, T., Sep. Purif. Technol.
1999, 16, 2, 159.
9. Fatehi, A. I.; Loughlin, K. F.; Hassan, M. M., Gas Sep. Purif. 1995, 9, 3, 199.
10. Cavenati, S.; Grande, C. A.; Rodrigues, A. E., J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2004, 49,
4, 1095.
11. Li, P.; Tezel, F. H., Micro. Meso. Materials. 2007, 98, 94.
12. Cavenati, S.; Grande, C. A.; Rodrigues, A. E., Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 12,
3893.
13. Sebastian, J.; Jasra, R. V., Chem. Commun. 2003, 268.
14. Chudasama, C. D.; Sebastian, J.; Jasra, R. V., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44,
6, 1780.
15. Hutson, N. D.; Rege, S. U.; Yang R. T., AIChE Journal. 1999, 45, 4, 724.
16. Rege, S.U.; Padin, J.; Yang R.T., AIChE Journal. 1998, 44, 4, 799.
17. Jasra, R. V.; Choudary, N. V.; Bhat, S. G. T., Sep. Sci. Tech. 1991, 26, 7,
885.
18. Jasra, R. V.; Choudary, N. V.; Bhat, S. G. T., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35,
11, 4221.
19. Sircar, S., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 16, 5435.
20. Peter, S. A.; Sebastian, J.; Jasra, R. V., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 17,
6856.
21. Yang, R. T., Adsorbents: Properties and Fundamentals; John Wiley & Sons:
New York, 2003.
Chapter-5 Sorption of CO, CH4 and N2 on Zeolite ZSM-5 with different SiO2/Al2O3 ratio
159
22. Shuzuki, M., Adsorption Engineering; Elsevier publications: Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, 1992.
23. Ruthven, D. M.; Farooq, S.; Knaebel, K. S. Pressure Swing Adsorption; VCH
publishers: New York, 1994.
24. Yang, R.T. Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes, Volume 1; Imperial
college press: London, 1997.
25. Ruthven, D. M. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes; John
Wiley and Sons: New York, 1984.
26. Skarstrom, C. W., U.S. Patent, 1960, 2, 944, 627.
27. Breck, D. W. Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry and Use; Wiley:
New York, 1974.
28. Delgado, J. A.; Uguina, M. A. Gómez, J. M.; Ortega, L. Sep. Purif. Technol.
2006, 48, 223.
29. Harlick, P. J. E.; Tejel, F. H. Sep. Sci. Tech. 2002, 37, 1, 33.
30. Yun, J. H.; Düren, T.; Keil, F. J.; Seaton, N. A. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2693.
31. Guest, J. E. Williams, Craig D. Chem. Comm. 2002, 23, 2870.
32. Mentasty, L.;
Woestyn, A. M.; Basaldella, E.; Kikot, A.; Zgrablich, G.
Adsorption Science and Technology 1994, 11, 209.
33. Jayaraman, A.; Hernandez-Maldonado, A. J.; Yang, R. T.; Chinn, D.;
Munson, C. L.; Mohr, D. H. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 2407.
34. Tsyganenko, A. A.; Platero, E. E.; Arean, C. O.; Garrone, E.; Zecchina A.,
Catalysis Letters. 1999, 61, 3, 187.
35. Li, P.; Tezel, F. H. Sep. Sci. Tech. 2007, 42, 14, 3131.
36. Harlick, P. J. E.; Tejel, F. H., Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 33, 2, 199.