gps leader™ in-vehicle data collection ben pierce by
TRANSCRIPT
GPS Leader™ In-vehicle Data Collection
www.gpsleader.com
Ben Pierce
By
Acknowledgementsfor
Ohio Department of TransportationData
Greg Giaimo Jesse Casas
Page 3Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Presentation Outline
Battelle and GPS Technical Review of GPS Leader™ Uses of GPS Leader™ Equipment Costs An Illustrative Example: Results from a
Recent Study in Ohio
Page 4Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Battelle and GPS
Battelle conducted one of the first GPS studies, as a trial case on behalf of FHWA, in Lexington, Kentucky in 1996-1997.
Current GPS Leader™ equipment was developed by Battelle as a result of this trial
To date, have collected GPS data from ~700 homes using GPS Leader™ equipment
Page 5Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Battelle’s GPS Leader™
Main Unit:Integrated GPS,Data Storage, &
Power Management
Palm OSHandheld Device(User Interface)
GPS Antenna
Package Includes: Main unit Palm OS PDA GPS antenna Cables Software for
downloading and managing data
Documentation and video
Page 6Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Features of GPS Leader™
Time to fix <2 minutes cold start, <45 seconds warm start, <20 seconds hot start
Data collected: (every second or less often)– Via the GPS receiver…
• vehicle location in latitude & longitude• travel speed
– Via the handheld user interface…• driver/occupants and trip purpose data• intersection or delay data
12 MB on-board memory, stores 5 to 7 days of detailed trip data for later download– Approximately 70 hours at the one-second level
Page 7Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Using GPS Leader™ for Household Travel Surveys
Can be used to actively (via PDA) or passively (via ignition sensing) to collect trip information (or a combination of both)
Battelle has mostly used a combination of active and passive trip detection
Page 8Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Household Travel Surveys: Entering User Supplied Data
Turn on vehicle, then PDA
Press ‘START’
Never need to enter data while vehicle is in motion
Page 9Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Household Travel Surveys: Entering Data
Select driver from pre-populated list
Select any passengers, if any, from pre-populated list
Stow PDA and begin driving
Page 10Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Household Travel Surveys: Entering Data (cont.)
Stop vehicle and select ‘END TRIP’
Select trip purpose for each occupant (will vary for each survey)
Indicate whether you are at your final destination or an intermediate stop
Page 11Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Household Travel Surveys: Entering Data (cont.) For intermediate stops, indicate
whether–there is a change in driver–you picked up a passenger–you dropped off a passenger
Otherwise, device is ready for next trip
Page 12Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Equipment Costs
Purchase Price = $1,650– GPS data collection and storage unit– GPS receiver – Handspring Visor PDA – PDA user data collection software – Data and power cables – GPS Leader Data Management
Software– User documentation
Lease Program
Fee-for-Service option
Lease Cost
Month Monthly Total
1 $350 $350
2 $300 $650
3 $250 $900
4 $250 $1,150
5 $200 $1,350
6 $200 $1,550
7 $150 $1,700
Page 13Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Uses of GPS Leader™ Other Than Household Travel Surveys
Travel Time Studies Vehicle Activity Surveys (e.g., Commercial Truck
Surveys) Emission Modeling and Duty Cycle Studies Fleet Performance / Operations Analysis
US 50 Travel Time Runs: Between Pershing Dr. and Waples Mill Rd.: Thur., Nov. 15, 2001
Start at 2:51 PM
Start at 3:37 PM
Start at 4:23 PM
Start at 5:16 PM
draft 12-11-01
Start at 2:16 PM
Start at 4:23 PM
Page 14Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Ohio Results: Methods
Used Combination of active and passive data collection (i.e., automatic trip detection and collection of trip information from user)
GPS self-installed/uninstalled by respondent
Diary retrieval was a separate process from GPS
Page 15Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Why GPS?
Page 16Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Ohio Results
On average, participants of the GPS study reported 1.3 – 1.6 times more person and vehicle trips during their diary interviews than did the main survey participants
Overall, there were roughly 8 percent of trips that were identified by GPS but were not reported in the diary
Page 17Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Ohio Results (cont.)Ratio of Average Diary Adjusted By GPS Vehicle and Person Trips per Household
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
1 2 3 4+ 1 2 3+ < $20k $20k -$39k
$40k-$59k
$60k> DK/RF
Rat
io
Vehicle: Diary Adj. by GPS vs. Diary
Person: Diary Adj. by GPS vs. Diary
No. HH VehiclesHH Size HH IncomeOverall
Page 18Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Ohio Results (cont.)
Percentage of Total Trips Not Reported Through Diary/Interviews
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
1 2 3 4+ 1 2 3+ M T W R
Per
cen
tag
e o
f T
ota
l T
rip
s
Vehicle Trips Person Trips
Overall HH Size No. HH Vehicles TD Day of Week
Page 19Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Ohio Results (cont.)Distribution of "Found" Trips by Trip Characteristics
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
ND D U D P U <5 5-10 >10 <5 5-10 10-30 >30
Per
cen
tag
e o
f F
ou
nd
Tri
ps
Vehicle Trips Person Trips
Trip Purpose Driver vs. Pass Distance (miles)
Duration (minutes)
Page 20Kentucky Traffic Model Users Group: Travel Survey Workshop
Questions?