grace davison fcc resid cracking - gobakbal.imp.mx/foros-ref/xiv/ag/ag3.pdf · 12 grace davison...

36
Grace Davison Refining Technologies 1 Grace Davison FCC Resid Cracking E. Thomas Habib, Jr. IMP Seminar Mexico City, Mexico September 3, 2008

Upload: vuongtu

Post on 04-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Grace Davison Refining Technologies1

Grace Davison

FCC Resid Cracking

E. Thomas Habib, Jr.

IMP SeminarMexico City, MexicoSeptember 3, 2008

2 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Overview

Resid Cracking Basics

Example – Pilot Plant Study

Issues

Resid Catalyst DesignZeolite Unit Cell Size (UCS)

Zeolite Mesoporosity and Extra-framework alumina

Matrix Pore Structure

Ni Tolerance

V Tolerance

Grace Resid Catalysts - Genesis®

3 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

4 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Resid Cracking Basics (continued)

Resid cracks rapidly (due to high MW) but:∆ Coke is high (raises regenerator temperature) which lowers Cat/Oil ratio. Metals from the resid poison the catalyst:

Increasing molecular H2 yield, Further increasing ∆ coke,And deactivating the catalyst (higher additions required to maintain activity).

Usually low feed temperature and/or catalyst coolers are needed (or the heat balance will force a very unattractive operation).Catalyst Coke Selectivity is Critical.

5 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Resid Cracking – Example Study

Feed PropertiesBase Feed Atm Resid

API Gravity 22.4 17.8

K Factor 11.67 11.64

CCR, wt% 0.8 5.9

Ni, ppm 0.2 11.9

V, ppm 0.2 6.2

6 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Resid Cracking Study(DCR Pilot plant data)

Delta Coke vs. Atm Bottoms in Feed

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00% 18.00%

Atm Bottoms in Feed, vol%

Del

ta C

oke,

wt%

7 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Resid Cracking Study(DCR Pilot plant data)

8 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Resid Cracking Study(DCR Pilot plant data)

Gasoline Yield vs. % Atm Bottoms in Feed

47

48

49

50

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%

Atm Bottoms in Feed, vol%

Gas

olin

e Yi

eld,

wt%

9 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Issues – MetalsNi and V appear in the resid fractions as metal complexes.

Fe can appear as “tramp Fe” – small particles of steel that have minimal effect, or as highly detrimental organic Fe.

Na is usually from salt water (poor de-salting).

Other metals are rare and can usually be traced to feeds slops (lube extracts, fuel additives, or catalyst fines from upstream processes).

10 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Ni Distribution on FCC Ecats

Two Extreme CasesLow Catalyst Turnover UnitHigh Catalyst Turnover Unit

For FCCUs with high catalyst addition rate relative to the total inventory, Ni tends to accumulate on the surface. However, given enough time in the unit, Ni can distribute uniformly throughout the particle.

Ni distribution on ECAT also depends on catalyst technology employed.

11 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Na and V Distribution on FCC Ecat

Na2O: 0.62%

Both Na and V distribute uniformly on ECAT particles.

V: 0.35%

12 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Nickel and Vanadium –Which is Worse?

Both Ni and V are dehydrogenation catalysts and will degrade valuable products to coke and H2.

Ni is ~ 4 times as active for hydrogen formation as V.

Ni Equivalent = Ni + V/4 – 1.21*SbNi can be passivated with Sb or Bi (maximum Sbpickup varies with catalyst and Ni level).

Ni tolerant FCC catalysts are available.

Ni is most detrimental under reducing conditions (partial burn regeneration).

13 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

VanadiumV (unlike Ni) destroys zeolite and lowers activity.

V (unlike Ni) is mobile and moves from catalyst particle to other catalyst particles.

V is most detrimental when oxidized (full burn regeneration).

V can be mitigated by catalyst V-traps.

Net: High V is usually a bigger problem.

14 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Conradson Carbon Residue (CCR) Also called Concarbon

CCR is a thermal destruction lab test that gives an indication of the direct coking tendency of the feed.

Typically, between 30% and 100% of CCR will go to coke, independent of conversion level.

Typical CCR:< 0.5% for VGO

Up to 9% for resid feeds.

Major impact on FCC operations via heat balance, increases regenerator temperature,

lowers Cat/Oil, and

lowers conversion.

15 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Other Impurities – Nitrogen & SulfurNitrogen and Sulfur levels tend to be higher for resid feeds than gas oil feeds.Hydrotreating the feed (or products) can greatly lower the levels, particularly for Sulfur. Nitrogen –

Absorbs on the catalyst sites, deactivating those sites until the N is burned off in the regenerator, and increasing coke. About 50% of feed N appears in coke.

Sulfur –Appears in all FCC product streams and is distributed according to the feed origin and pre-treatment.Little effect on conversion and yields, but:Has a major effect on operations due to emission regulations and fuel specifications.

Sulfur in gasoline and regenerator flue gas (SOX) can be minimized by use of special FCC catalysts and additives.

16 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

FCC Resid Catalyst DesignResid Catalyst Requirements:

Coke selectivity Bottoms crackingStability

Design Control Features:Zeolite Unit Cell Size (UCS)Zeolite Extraframework Alumina and MesoporosityMatrix Activity and Pore StructureNi TrapsV Traps

17 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Effect of USC on Coke Selectivity

3.40

3.50

3.60

3.70

3.80

3.90

4.00

4.10

4.20

4.30

4.40

24.2 24.25 24.3 24.35 24.4 24.45Unit Cell Size, Angstroms

Cok

e w

t%

USY

CREYunit cell size rangefor minimum cokeca. 24.28 - 24.34 Å

18 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

TEM of TEM of TEM of DealuminatedDealuminatedDealuminated YYY---ZeoliteZeoliteZeolite

Role of Mesopores:Increases the diffusivity of hydrocarbon molecules to the interior of the zeolite.Provides additional matrix surface area for bottoms cracking.

19 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

0,00

0,04

0,08

0,12

0,16

0,20

10 100 1000

Pore Diameter (Å)

Por

e V

olum

e (c

c/g)

24.24 Å

24.31 Å24.36 Å

24.41 Å

24.45 Å

CPS with 3000ppm V + 2000ppm Ni

N2 PSD of Al Sol Catalysts with Varying UCSN2 PSD of Al Sol Catalysts with Varying UCSN2 PSD of Al Sol Catalysts with Varying UCSMesopore volume increases with increasing level of dealumination

20 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Role of Extra-framework Alumina

USYZeolite Extra-

framework Alumina

Initiates cracking reactionsStrong Lewis acid sites

Together with Framework Alumina, form Super Bronsted acid sites

Provides Matrix Activity for Bottoms Cracking

21 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Extra-framework Alumina Increases ActivityKinetics of n-Hexane Cracking

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550

Reaction Temperature/C

Turn

over

Rat

e (m

olec

ule/

site

s

x10^

5)

Hydrothermal Dealumination Chemical Dealumination

High Extraframework Al2O3

Low Extraframework Al2O3

Data from Kung et al., Catal Today, 52 (1999) 91

22 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Role of FCC Matrix

Provides pore structure to allow feed molecules to diffuse in and product molecules to diffuse out of the catalyst.

Helps crack the large molecules to provide ‘feed’ for the zeolite component.

Active for cracking naphthenoaromaticcompounds.

Important for metals tolerance.

23 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Bottoms Cracking MechanismRef., Zhao et al, AM-02-52

R

Type III

matrix dependent

Type III - Conversion of naphthenoaromatics

R

Type II

zeolite dependent

Type II - Dealkylation of alkyl aromatics

Type I - Precracking and Feed Vaporization

Feed

Type I matrix dependent

24 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Matrix Activity Can Improve Coke SelectivityMatrix activity is combination of porosity and number of acid sites

Coke to bottoms selectivity advantage of high matrix activity alumina-sol increases with increasing amount of resid in the feedstock.

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Wt% Feed 1070F+

Cok

e Yi

eld

Diff

eren

ce(H

igh

–Lo

w M

atrix

Act

ivity

)

Pilot plant studies

25 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Configuration Diffusion:Deff = Dbulk (1-dmolecule/dpore)4

(Spry et al, 1975)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 20 40 60 80 100

dpore/dmolecule

Def

f / D

bulk

Ratio dpore/ dmolecule needs to be in the range 10-20 to be outside configurational diffusion range.

Catalyst pores need to be in the range of about 100-600Å for free diffusion of molecules in the range 10-30Å.

Heavy feed molecules are of the size range 10 – 30Å.

Importance of Pore Size

26 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Feed Vaporization and Pre-Cracking:Bottoms Conversion vs. Mesopore Volume

Catalyst Mesopore Volume (100-600Å), cc/g

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

Kine

tic C

onve

rsio

n of

Bot

tom

s

Importance of Pore Size

Kinetic conversion of bottoms increases with 100-600Åpore volume.

27 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Small Pores Increase Coke and Hydrogen

Pilot plant testing, Resid feed5000 ppm metals/CPS

Coke

8.28.48.68.89.09.29.49.69.8

0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075PV <100 Ang, cc/g

Cok

e, w

t%

Hydrogen

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06 0.065 0.07 0.075

PV <100 Ang, cc/g

H2,

wt%

28 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Resid Catalysts Require Metals Tolerance

29 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Reducing Contaminant Coke with Ni PassivationDavison Ni passivation technologies (e.g., TRM-400 and LCM) lower the amount of reducible nickel.

NiO + Al2O3 → Ni Al2O4

Ni Passivation MechanismNi Passivation MechanismNiNi NiONiO

Ni

XPS Analysis of Ni on FCC CatalystsEffect of Matrix Type

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

Base Ni TrapCatalyst Type

NiO

/NiA

l 2O

4M

olar

Rat

io

845850855860865870

Cou

nts

/ Sec

NiAl2O4

NiO

XPS Data2000 ppm Ni

Binding Energy (eV)

30 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Vanadium ToleranceV Traps

Reduce coke and hydrogenProtect the zeolite from deactivation

50µm RE 50µm V

“Hot spots” indicate where rare earth (RE) trap interacts with vanadiumMost of the particle remains relatively free of V contamination

The IVT-4 is utilized in IMPACT® technology

31 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Genesis Catalysts for Resid Feeds

Genesis Catalysts are blends of Midas® with other catalysts.

For resid feeds, Midas® blended with Impact®

provides optimal performance:Excellent coke selectivity

Superior bottoms cracking

High metals tolerance

Ratio of Midas to Impact can be adjusted for specific feed and yield objectives.

32 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

The GENESIS Catalyst SystemMIDAS is the key componentOptimize Z/M ratio for each application by blending with high zeolite catalyst

• IMPACT, Al sol, or Si sol

Catalyst blend performance often exceeds average performance of individual catalysts25 applications world-wide across a broad range of feed types and operating scenarios

Why does it work? Why does it work? DCR study over 3 feeds with

IMPACTMIDASGENESIS

Name Ni + V Feed type Blend ComponentRefiner 1 230 VGO IMPACTRefiner 2 250 Hydrotreated SPECTRARefiner 3 400 Hydrotreated ORIONRefiner 4 900 Hydrotreated IMPACTRefiner 5 1300 VGO IMPACTRefiner 6 1800 VGO IMPACTRefiner 7 1900 VGO IMPACTRefiner 8 2000 VGO AURORARefiner 9 2000 Resid IMPACTRefiner 10 2500 VGO ORIONRefiner 11 2500 VGO SPECTRARefiner 12 3000 VGO AURORARefiner 13 3000 Resid IMPACTRefiner 14 3000 Resid AURORARefiner 15 3500 Resid IMPACTRefiner 16 3500 Resid IMPACTRefiner 17 3800 VGO IMPACTRefiner 18 4000 Resid ORIONRefiner 19 6000 Resid IMPACTRefiner 20 7000 Resid IMPACTRefiner 21 7000 Resid ADVANTARefiner 22 7500 Resid IMPACTRefiner 23 9500 Resid AURORARefiner 24 11500 Resid IMPACTRefiner 25 12000 Resid IMPACT

33 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

Properties of IMPACT and Midas

IMPACT MIDASFresh PropertiesAl2O3 wt% 45.2 49.5RE2O3 wt% 4.9 2.0SA m2/g 317 267Zeolite m2/g 263 154Matrix m2/g 54 113

Deactivated PropertiesSA m2/g 187 175Zeolite m2/g 149 92Matrix m2/g 38 83

Unit Cell 24.28 24.29Hg PSD cm3/g 0.338 0.429

0-100 cm3/g 0.034 0.101100-1000 cm3/g 0.132 0.279

1000+ cm3/g 0.172 0.049

34 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

5.6

5.8

6.0

6.2

6.4

6.6

6.8

7.0

7.2

7.4

7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0Bottoms, wt%

Cok

e, w

t%

Impact

Midas

Genesis

RESIDDCR Pilot Plant Results

GENESIS catalysts demonstrate a superior coke superior coke to bottoms relationshipto bottoms relationship that either component alone, regardless of the feed quality!

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

3.2

3.4

3.6

7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5Bottoms, wt%

Cok

e, w

t%

Impact

Midas

GENESIS

HydrotreatedVGO

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5Bottoms, wt%

Cok

e, w

t%

ImpactMidasGENESIS

35 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

7.57.06.56.05.55.04.5

9

8

7

6

5

Coke, wt%

Bo

tto

ms ,

wt %

IM P A C TMIDA S

GENESIS

Commercial Example of GENESIS Synergy (Resid Feed)

36 Grace Davison Refining Technologies

ConclusionsFCC Resid cracking is usually economic despite difficulties because of extremely low value of Resid.Difficulties for cracking Resid relate to impurities (CCR, metals, N) and the resulting high ∆ Coke.Resid Catalysts must be designed for improved coke selectivity, bottoms cracking, metals tolerance and stability.

Zeolite UCS should equilibrate in the desired range of 24.28 -24.34 Å.

ZSA/MSA should be adjustable – for more resid, increase MSA.

Pore volume in the 100-600Å range should be high,

Catalysts should contain both Ni and V traps.

Genesis grades (blends of Midas and Impact) have all these features.