grand rounds paper of the week 1. subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open...

Grand Rounds

Paper of the week

1

Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-

label, randomised controlled trial

Tsujinaka et al, The Lancet 28 September-04 October, 2013

2

Introduction-1

• Post op wound complications are common problem

• Sub-cuticular suture (SCS) is an attractive way of skin closure in most types of surgery

• Many ASA class 1 (clean surgery) studies with SCS found– Low wound complications– Good cosmetic appearance

3

Introduction-2

• However in ASA class 2 (clean-contaminated) wounds the usefulness of one over the other is not know

• Staples are preferred – Convenience of use– Speed of use

4

Study aims

• To investigate differences in prevention of wound complications between sub-cuticular sutures and staples after elective upper and lower gastrointestinal open surgery

5

The Fight

Vs

6

Study design-1

• Large-scale multi-centre phase 3 randomised control trial

• B/t June 1, 2009 and Feb 28, 2012• Superiority trial

7

Study design-2

• Inclusion criteria– Pt undergoing Upper or lower GI surgery– Age >20– Adequate organ function

• Exclusion criteria (among others)– Emergency or laparoscopic surgery– Pervious history of midline incision– Long term corticosteroids use– Active infections– Uncontrolled DM

8

Study arms

• Subcuticular suture group – Interrupted subcuticular sutures with 3-0 or 4-0 monofilament

absorbable suture – The interval of the sucuticular sutures was 15–25 mm and the

length of the bite of sutures was 15–25 mm from the edge of the skin.

– ± Use of sterile strips or skin glue for epidermal approximation (an institutional choice)

• Staples group – Metallic skin staples, which were the choice of individual

institutions, 10–15 mm apart were used. – Before the trial, investigators from participating institutions were

instructed on how to do subcuticular sutures during the trial

9

Randomisation

• Randomisation by a computer-generated permuted-block sequence

• Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either subcuticular sutures or staples arms and

• Balanced according to institution, sex, and type of surgery (ie. upper or lower gastrointestinal open surgery)

10

Study outcomes

• Primary outcome – Incidence of wound complications within 30

days of surgery. • Secondary outcome

– Incidence of hypertrophic scar formation 6 months after surgery

11

Results-2Types of diseases and surgical procedures in patients undergoing

upper gastrointestinal surgery Subcuticular sutures (n=385) Staples (n=417)

Diseases

Gastric cancer 375 (97.4%) 403 (96.6%)

Gastric submucosal tumour 6 (1.6%) 9 (2.2%)

Other 4 (1.0%) 5 (1.2%)

Procedures

Total gastrectomy 149 (38.7%) 143 (34.3%)

Distal gastrectomy 186 (48.3%) 219 (52.5%)

Proximal gastrectomy 19 (4.9%) 16 (3.8%)

Exploratory laparotomy 4 (1.0%) 4 (1.0%)

Other 27 (7.0%) 35 (8.4%)13

Results-3Types of diseases and surgical procedures in patients undergoing

lower gastrointestinal surgery

Subcuticular sutures (n=177) Staples (n=101)

Diseases

Colon cancer 98 (55.4%) 51 (50.5%)

Rectal cancer 71 (40.1%) 48 (47.5%)

Anal cancer 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.0%)

Other 6 (3.4%) 1 (1.0%)

Procedures

Right hemicolectomy 41 (23.2%) 28 (27.7%)

Left hemicolectomy 44 (24.9%) 8 (7.9%)

Low anterior resection 61 (34.5%) 38 (37.6%)

Abdominoperineal resecti 11 (6.2%) 10 (9.9%)

Partial resection of colon 9 (5.1%) 10 (9.9%)

Other 11 (6.2%) 7 (6.9%) 14

Results-4 All patients

Subcuticular suture

(n=558)Staples (n=514)

Odds ratio (95% CI) p

Primary outcome

Wound complication rate* 47 (8.4%) 59 (11.5%) 0.7 (0.4-1.0) 0.12

Component outcomes

Surgical site infection (superficial incisional) 36 (6.4%) 36 (7.0%) 0.9 (0.5-1.5) 0.81

Non-surgical-site infection 11 (2.0%) 23 (4.5%) 0.4 (0.1-0.9) 0.02

Wound separation 3 (0.5%) 8 (1.6%) 0.3 (0.0-1.4) 0.13

Seroma 5 (0.9%) 12 (2.3%) 0.3 (0.1-1.1) 0.09

Haematoma 1 (0.2%) 2 (0.4%) 0.4 (0.0-8.9) 0.61

Other 2 (0.4%) 1 (0.2%) 1.8 (0.0-1.3) 115

Results-5 Upper gastrointestinal surgery

Subcuticular sutures (n=176)

Staples (n=101)


Primary outcome


Component outcomes




Seroma 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.0%) 1.1 (0.0-1.4) 1

Haematoma 1 (0.6%) 1 (1.0%) 0.5 (0.0-4.3) 1

Other 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) .. ..16

Results-6 Lower gastrointestinal surgery

Subcuticular sutures (n=382)

Staples (n=413)


Primary outcome


Component outcomes




Seroma 3 (0.8%) 11 (2.7%) 0.2 (0.0-1.1) 0.06

Haematoma 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.2%) .. ..

Other 2 (0.5%) 1 (0.2%) 2.1 (0.1-1.1) 0.6117

Results-7Secondary outcomes in the modified intention-to-treat population

Hypertrophic scar formation n Odds ratio (95% CI) p

All patients 0.7 (0.5-0.9) 0.04

Subcuticular sutures 558 93 (16.7%)

Staples 514 111 (21.6%)

Upper gastrointestinal 0.6 (0.4-0.9) 0.02


Staples 413 98 (23.7%)

Lower gastrointestinal 1.2 (0.5-2.7) 0.72


Staples 101 13 (12.9%)

18

Discussion 1

• Strengths– Level 1 evidence (RCT)– Simple methodology– Large study and long duration– Surgeon well trained to put suture/staples– Information about surgery at upper vs lower

GI– Cant be double/single blinded

19

Discussion 2

• Weakness– No data on number of patients approached or

assessed for eligibility– Third arm with skin glue could be used– Did not include hepatobiliary or pancreatic

surgery – No data on duration of surgery, patients'

satisfaction, patients' preference

20

Conclusions

• Unlike in ASA class 1 surgery this trial failed to prove subcuticular sutures were a new standard procedure for skin closure after gastrointestinal surgery;

• The formation of hypertrophic scars was significantly reduced with subcuticular sutures compared with staples

21

Take home message Like/Unlike

Suture Staples

Wound complication

Overall

Upper

Lower

Scar formation

Overall

Upper

Lower 22

Future??

Upper GI

Lower GI

23

Thank you

24

grand rounds paper of the week 1. subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open...

Documents