GRAPHICS ONEPORTFOLIO

IAN MCGEEARST 453DEC. 17/16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS 1

PRECEDENT DRAWINGS 3

TRANSFORMATIVE EXPLORATIONS 7

MAPPING MATERIAL FLOWS 9

IMAGE MANIPULATIONS 13

ALGORITHMIC MANIPULATION 17

SURFACE MANIPULATION 21

DATA DRIVEN ASSEMBLIES 25

FABRICATION 29

OR

THO

GR

AP

HIC

PR

OJE

CTI

ON

S

IAN MCGEE1

PROCESS

A series of rough sketches were pro-duced in an attempt to understand how

to represent an irregualar threedimensional object through

architectural drawings. In these sketches speculations were made

about the interior of the object and how best to represent it.

After these sketches, refined versions were created and build upon the

speculative foundations established in the rough sketch phase.

OR

THO

GR

AP

HIC

PR

OJE

CTI

ON

S

IAN MCGEE 2

REFINED

ELEVATION I

ELEVATION II

AXONOMETRICSECTION I

SECTION II

TOP VIEW

OR

THO

GR

AP

HIC

PR

OJE

CTI

ON

S

IAN MCGEE 2

REFINED

ELEVATION I

ELEVATION II

AXONOMETRICSECTION I

SECTION II

TOP VIEW

PRECEDENTDRAWINGS

PR

EC

ED

EN

T D

RAW

ING

S

IAN MCGEE 4

PROCESS

Quick research sketches of a precedent house were developed as a means of understanding the

tectonics of the structre. In this case, Peter Eisenman’s House VI was looked at in an attempt

to comprehend the relative size of its spaces and of the objects inhabiting the space. These drawings

are used as templates in order to create digitally rendered drawings the proper scale using Rhino.

Certain elements were also picked out in colour in these drawings as a way to easily identify how

specific elements interact, which was useful when digitially recreating thee drawings.These prelimi-

nary sketches served as excellent resources when trying to understand the intricacies of House VI and

its many extraneous elements.

PR

EC

ED

EN

T D

RAW

ING

S

IAN MCGEE5

DIGITAL

east section

west section

ground floor plans

PR

EC

ED

EN

T D

RAW

ING

S

IAN MCGEE 6

DIGITAL

south elevation

west elevation

first floor plans

TRANSFORMATIVEEXPLORATIONS

Original Portion Of House

This portion of House VI emphasizes the linear geometric form of the structure. By having perpendicular component parts, this piece also hints at the grid structure which isan integral part of House VI’s design concept. By transforming this piece through a calculated process the final object will have a conceptual connection to House VI, though the aesthetic qualities will be very different.

Rotation Polar Array Mirror

Shift

CopyScale

Rendered Image

Elevation View

Top View

TRA

NS

FOR

MAT

IVE

EXP

LOR

ATIO

NS

IAN MCGEE 8

TRANSFORMATIONS

Section View

MAPPING IMMATERIAL

FLOWS

MA

PP

ING

IMM

ATE

RIA

L FL

OW

S

IAN MCGEE 10

SITE

secluded areas created by vegetation insufficient artificial lighting

factors contributing to sense of vulnerability

From day to night, the site transitions from being an open and well lit space with fairly high traffic volume to a very dark space with a low usage. Late at night, areas of the site can make the person engaging the site feel uneasy or vulnerable. Determining how to map these immaterial sensations poses a potential problem. In the case a feeling of vulnerability on the site at night, it was decided that the most effective way to map this was by creating an ‘artificial topography’.

N

12:00 AM

3:30 AM

POINTS

OF

VULNERABILITY

no percieved sense of vulnerability before

12:00 AM

MA

PP

ING

IMM

ATE

RIA

L FL

OW

S

IAN MCGEE11

ARTIFICIAL TOPOGRAPHY

By extending the points from the percieved vulnerability map into three dimensions, an artificial topography can be created. This artificial topography creates what is essentially a bar graph from the terrain extending the areas of increased sense of vulnerability higher.

In the model, the trees are depicted as seperating the terrain into distnctspaces. This is because the vulnerability graph is largely contingent upon both the secluded areas defined by the trees as well as the absence or presence of artifical light on the site. eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto

IMAGEMANIPULATIONS

IMA

GE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

NS

IAN MCGEE 14

PROCESS

15

30

45

60

75

150%

200%

90

copyrotate

selection oncenter

copymirror along

y - axis

copymirror along

x - axis

copyscale up

copyscale up

horizontally

copyrotate on

center

crop

PSEUDO-CODE

Having an understanding how different software affects an image differently is a valuable resource. Through this exercise, I manipulated

the same image using the same process in three different softwares, each yeilding slightly different results and then placed the final product

into an urban setting.

PHOTOSHOP ILLUSTRATOR RHINO

IMA

GE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

NS

IAN MCGEE15

RESULTS

PHO

TOSH

OP

ILLU

STRA

TOR

RHIN

O

ITERATIONS

IMA

GE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

NS

IAN MCGEE 16

CONTEXT

IMA

GE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

NS

IAN MCGEE 16

CONTEXT

ALGORITHMICMANIPULATION

ALG

OR

ITH

MIC

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE 18

VISUAL CODING

create point in desired location

from point, create a square

copy the square and paste it above the firstsquare the same distance as the length of

the square

a

a

a

rotate the upper square 12.857

loft between the upper and lower squares

cap the object

copy the curve of the upper square and pasteit above the upper square

repeat steps 3 to 7 five more times

repeat step 3 to 6 one time

variations1

2

3

4

5

6

7

rotate the upper square by the current height of the structure

copy the square and paste it above the first square according to the present rotation of the structure

from the bottom cube

copy the curve of the upper square and scale the square to 75% of the

previous square

aa = r

r

hr

r = h

s

p s = 75% p

This excercise explores how software such as grasshopper can be used to create geometric manipulations by using a

repeating algorithm. In this example, Santiago Calatrava’s Turning Torso tower is used as an example of

repeating geometry which creates a cohesive object.

Variation can be achieved with minor modification to the algorithm

ALG

OR

ITH

MIC

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE19

ADAPTATIONinitial pseudo-code

create point in desired location

from point, create a square

copy the square and paste it above the first square the same distance as the length of the square

rotate the upper square 12.857

loft between the upper and lower squares

cap the object

copy the curve of the upper squareand paste it above the upper square

repeat steps 3 to 7 five more times

repeat step 3 to 6 one time

new pseudo-codeset rectangle in grasshopper

move new rectangle up above originalrectangle the distance of the lengthof the square

use polygon center to find center of rectangle

convert degrees to radians

rotate upper square 12.857

loft between the two squares

cap the object

copy the curve of the upper squareand paste it above the upper square

repeat steps 3 to 7 five more times

repeat step 3 to 6 one time

changesset rectangle

initial new

drag rectangle from point

rectangle

set rectangle

reason - no drag rectangle from point option

find centerinitial new

no defined pivot point rotate on center point

reason - need consitent acurate rotations

convert degrees

initial new

assumed that unitswould be in degrees

converted degrees toradians

reason - without converting degrees to radians the object over-rotates

rectangle

a

a

degrees radians

12.857

ALG

OR

ITH

MIC

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

NS

IAN MCGEE 20

CONTEXT AND ITERATIONS

iterations

As the structure developsupwards, the rotation of eachcomponent rectangle is increased by a multiple corresponding to the order of the rectangle in the upward sequence beginning with a rotation of 12.857 in the first rectangle.

1x

2x

3x4x

5x

6x

7x

(12.857 )

(25.714 )

(38.571 )

(51.428 )

(64.258 )

(77.142 )

(77.142 )

As the structure developsupwards, the height of eachcomponent cube is decreased by 75% based on the height of the cube below.

100%

-75%

-75%

-75%-75%-75%-75%

In this iteration, the top and bottom cubes are doubled inheight and remaining cubes decrease in height towards themiddle by a rate of 75% of theprevious cube. Both the top and bottom cube have a rotation of 12.875 and this increases towards the middle by a rate of 2 times greater than the previous cube’s rotation until the middle cube is reached. 200%

200%

-75%

-75%

-75%

-75%-75%

(12.857 )

(12.857 )

(25.714 )

(25.714 )

(38.571 )

(38.571 )

(51.428 )

As the structure developsupwards, the scale of eachcomponent cube is decreased by 75% based on the scale of the cube below.

100%

-75%

-75%

-75%

-75%

-75%

-75%

As the structure developsupwards, the x and z axis of each component cube areincreased by 25% based on the cube below.

+25%+25%+25%+25%

+25%

+25%

+25%

urban context

Various iterations are achieved through a slight manipulation in the algorithm. With

each of these manipulations, vastly different results are reached.

SURFACE MANIPULATION

SU

RFA

CE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE 22

PSEUDO-CODE

PSEUDO-CODE

ATTRACTOR

VARIABILITY

create curve recreating the rotation in turning torso

measure curve’s distance fromsmall rectangles

distance from curve turns on oroff small rectanges

measure curve’s distance fromsmall rectangles

distance from curve determines they-axis extrusion of small rectangles

create surface divide surface into grid subdivide grid further

using the points from the grid... create large and small rectangleto echo the cubes in turning torso

patch between rectangles to createa surface with rectangular holes

1 2 3

1 2 3

1 2 3

4 5 6

distance from points and shapeof curve produce variability

density of grid produces variability

initial shape of surfaceproduces variability

using a shape other than rectangles produces variability

create curve recreating the rotation in turning torso

Using algorithmically based production methods can develop geometries that would otherwise be diffficult to create. Through grasshopper, intricate surfaces can be developed and manipulated easily. This pseudo-code shows the development of such a surface.

SU

RFA

CE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE23

SURFACE MANIPULATION

create a surface by lofting two curves

divide surface into grid using ‘divide domain’ and ‘isotrim’

further divide grid using ‘divide domain’ and ‘isotrim’

using ‘deconstruct brep’, identify the faces of the geometry in the grid

using ‘area’, find the center of each of the faces of the geometry

using ‘scale’, create a network of small and large rectangles in the grids

using ‘surface split’, turn the small and large rectangles into holes through the surface

create curve and (or) point measure distance between grid and curve and (or) point using ‘curve closest point’ (for curve) and (or) ‘distance’ (for point)

using ‘larger than’, remove any small rectangles smaller than set size. Dispatch results as a surface

create curve and (or) point using ‘curve closest point’, measure distance between grid of small rectangles and curve

use ‘curve closest point’ to determine the amplitude, extrude in both positive and negative directions along the y-axis

pseudo-code

attractor I attractor II

in the context of Mies van der Rohe’s Neue Gallery in Berlin, Germany

SU

RFA

CE

MA

NIP

ULA

TIO

NS

IAN MCGEE 24

ITERATIONSno removal of grid by attractor curve no removal of grid by attractor curve

non-linear curve input

linear attractor curve attractor point

attractor pointnon-linear curve input

Lorem ipsum

attractor pointextrusion amplified

attractor point amplifiednon-linear curve input

attractor curvenon-linear curve input

DATADRIVEN

ASSEMBLIES

DAT

A D

RIV

EN

AS

SE

MB

LIE

S

IAN MCGEE 26

INITIAL PSEUDO-CODE

change in RGB/hue values change in RGB/hue values

orignial shape change in polygons change in polygonschange in RGB values

change in polygonschange in RGB values

change in RGB/hue values

variation

I II III IV

V VI VII

create surface define grid create rectangles basedon R and G values in center of grid cell

create circles basedon B values

move the circles along Z axis according to hue loft between geometry cap geometry

pseudo

code

flow along a 3-D surface

I II

III IIIselect object unwrap object

situate surface on objectthrough UV coordinates

reassemble object with new surface

selected

image

This excercise focuses on creating a three dimensionalfrom a two dimensional surface using grasshopper. Thistype of three dimensional mapping is especially usefulfor creating interesting building facades and for regulating light diffusion through a surface.

DAT

A D

RIV

EN

AS

SE

MB

LIE

S

IAN MCGEE27

MAPPING TO SURFACE

V

VI

VII

I II III IV

create surface define grid create rectangles based on R and G values using ‘remap numbers’ to change the colour’s domain from 0 -1 to 1 - 1.5

create rectangles based on B values using ‘remap numbers’ to change the colour’s domain from 0-1 to 1 - 1.5

move the circles in the direction of the normals based on the ‘remapped’ RGB values

V

VI

VII

‘loft’ between the rectangles and the circles and ‘cap holes’

‘loft’ between the rectangles and the

circles and ‘cap holes’

create a 3D surface by replacing the initial flat surface in grasshopper with a 3-D object and build the geometry on

this 3D surface

move the circles in the direction of the

normals based on an average of the RGB

values added with the value of the normal

vector

3-D transformation II

create surface

I

create cylinder

IIuse ‘unroll surface’to seperate cylinder

III

use ‘�ow along surface’to merge created surface to surface of cylinder

IV

V�ow along surface

3-D transformation I 3-D transformation Icreate a 3D surface by replacing the initial flat surface with a 3-D object and build the geometry on the 3D surface

DAT

A D

RIV

EN

AS

SE

MB

LIE

S

IAN MCGEE 28

ITERATIONSnormals controlled by RGB values

�ow along surface

20 x 20 UV Grid 35 x 35 UV Grid 50 x 50 UV Grid 85 x 85UV Grid

FAB

RIC

ATIO

N T

OO

LS

IAN MCGEE 30

MEASURED CONTEXTS

70'-2

.75"

29'-9

.25"

8'-3

"

28'-7

"

34'-10"

47'-9"

2'-11.25"2'-11.25"1'-4.5"

12'-5" 10'-6.25"

4'-3

.5"

4'-11.5"

63'-10.75"

3'-11.5"

3'-10"

5'-1.5"

4'-8.75"

28'-7.75"

4'-7"

12'-6.5"

13'-5.59"

4'-5.75"

1'-0

.5 "

7'-3

"3'

-6.5

"

7'-3

"4'

-0.2

4"

7'-3

"3'

-6.7

5"

7'-3

"3'

-11.

5"

7'-3

"3'

-6.5

"

7'-3

"1'

-2.5

"

5'-8

.75"

3'-1

1.5"

2'-1.75"

2'-9

"

19'-2

.75"

19'-5

.25"

19'-8

.5"

1'-1

0.25

"

1'-6.75"

1'-1

0.25

"

1'-6.75"

1'-5

.25"

1'-7"

47

3

5

5

34

7

Scal

e

Dra

wn

by

Dat

e

Proj

ect n

umbe

rAs

sign

men

t 09

Kels

ey B

raun

Ian

McG

eeSa

hil K

hakh

arSt

eve

Belt

Julie

Sor

ense

n

Nov

. 20,

201

6

A9-1

No.

Des

crip

tion

Dat

e

Fabr

icat

ion

Tool

s 1:

M

easu

red

Con

text

s

As In

dica

ted

WES

T EL

EVAT

ION

1/8”

= 1

’4

13'-11.5"9'-5"4'-6.5"

1'

7'-2.5"5'-6.5"

10" 1'3'-1.5"

9'-8

"16

'-1.7

5"4'

-5.7

5"11

'-1"

10'-6

.25"

2'-1

1.25

"1'

-4.5

"2'

-11.

25"

12'-5

"2'

-1.7

5"

1'-7

.75"

1'4'

47'-9

"

SOU

TH E

LEVA

TIO

N1/

8” =

1’

6

4'-6.5" 1'-0.01" 8'-4.91"13'-11.42"

3'-1.5"5.5"

6'2'-5"

28'-7

"8'

-3"

2"2'

-3.5

"2'

-6.7

5"6"

3.25

"

19'-7

.75"

1'-6

.03"

4'-0

.25"

70'-2

.75"

2

EAST

ELE

VATI

ON

31/

8” =

1’

NO

RTH

ELE

VATI

ON

51/

8” =

1’

PLAN

11/

8” =

1’

REF

LEC

TED

CEI

LIN

G P

LAN

1/8”

= 1

’

Gra

phic

s 1

64'-4

.6"

13'-11.5"

1'-0

.5"

7'-3

"3'

-6.4

5"7'

-3"

1'-2.2

5" 1'-8

.25"

1'-1.8

8"

7'-3

"3'

-6.7

5"7'

-3"

1'-2

"

1'-8.2

5"1'-

1.25"

7'-3

"3'

-6.5

"7'

-3"

1'-2.5

2"

63'-1

0.73

"

3'-6

"3'

-1.5

"3'

-1.5

"2'

-9.5

"4'

-7"

12'-6

.5"

3'-1

0.5"

3'-1

0.5"

3'-1

0.5"

3'-1

0.5"

1'-7

"3'

-10.

25"

3'-1

0.23

"3'

-10.

22"

5'-1

.5"

3'-1

0"1'

-11.

25"1

'-6"

1'

28'-7

.73"

13'-4

.75"

13'-11.5"

8'-5"1'

9'-0.5"

6'

47'-9

"

8 9

6

7SE

CTI

ON

I

N

1'-11.89"

3.42

"

1.46

"

8'-4.55"

9'-7.17"

9'-9.46"2.23"

3.47" 1.94"

1.99"

1.96

"

1.44"2.02"1.92"

12

3

45

6

9

12

3

45678

9

2.1"

1.92"1.98"

2'-0.72"

7"

1'-2

.34" 5

.61"

1.9" 3

.48"

1.26"

6.89

"

7.59

"

3.94"2.11"

1'-10.21"2.55"

INTE

RIO

R W

ALL

SEC

TIO

N1/

4” =

1’

EXTE

RIO

R W

ALL

SEC

TIO

N1/

4” =

1’

13'-9.31"1'-9.76"2'-2.31"

1'-0.19"7"

7'-4.19"5'-2.91"

2'-6.22"

58'-0

.17"

5.61

"

5'-9

.09"

2'-6

.51"

4.6"

11.1

9"1'

-2.7

2"2'

-2.9

3"

13'-8

"1'

56

7

8

9

11

2

10

1112

3

4

LEG

END

8 - I

NTE

RIO

R W

ALL

SEC

TIO

N

1 - G

YPSU

M B

OAR

D2

- STE

EL S

TUD

S3

- AC

OU

STIC

AL C

EILI

NG

TIL

ES4

- Q-D

ECK

5 - C

ON

CR

ETE

SLAB

6 - R

IGID

INSU

LATI

ON

7 - A

LUM

INU

M W

IND

OW

FR

AME

8 - R

ED B

RIC

K VE

NEE

R9

- STE

EL J

OIS

T

9 - E

XTER

IOR

WAL

LSE

CTI

ON

1 - G

YPSU

M B

OAR

D2

- STE

EL S

TUD

S3

- AC

OU

STIC

AL C

EILI

NG

TIL

ES4

- Q-D

ECK

5 - C

ON

CR

ETE

SLAB

6 - R

IGID

INSU

LATI

ON

7 - A

LUM

INU

M W

IND

OW

FR

AME

8 - R

ED B

RIC

K VE

NEE

R9

- STE

EL J

OIS

T

10 -

SEC

TIO

N I

1 - G

YPSU

M B

OAR

D2

- FAB

RIC

AC

OU

STIC

AL W

ALL

PAN

EL3

- STE

EL S

TUD

S4

- AC

OU

STIC

AL C

EILI

NG

TIL

ES5

- Q-D

ECK

6 - C

ON

CR

ETE

SLAB

7 - R

IGID

INSU

LATI

ON

8 - A

LUM

INU

M W

IND

OW

FR

AME

9 - R

ED B

RIC

K VE

NEE

R10

- ST

EEL

JOIS

T11

- ST

EEL

POST

12 -

HVA

C D

UC

T

v

1/8”

= 1

’

4'-6" 1'-6.75" 1'-6.75"

1'-7

.75"

70'-3

.03"

6'-2

.66"

48'-9.17"34'-1.18"

11'-4.75"

49'-8.73" 9'-11"7'

3'-8.77" 1'-0.22"5'

1'-7.44"

FABRICATION

FAB

RIC

ATIO

N T

OO

LS

IAN MCGEE 30

MEASURED CONTEXTS

70'-2

.75"

29'-9

.25"

8'-3

"

28'-7

"

34'-10"

47'-9"

2'-11.25"2'-11.25"1'-4.5"

12'-5" 10'-6.25"

4'-3

.5"

4'-11.5"

63'-10.75"

3'-11.5"

3'-10"

5'-1.5"

4'-8.75"

28'-7.75"

4'-7"

12'-6.5"

13'-5.59"

4'-5.75"

1'-0

.5 "

7'-3

"3'

-6.5

"

7'-3

"4'

-0.2

4"

7'-3

"3'

-6.7

5"

7'-3

"3'

-11.

5"

7'-3

"3'

-6.5

"

7'-3

"1'

-2.5

"

5'-8

.75"

3'-1

1.5"

2'-1.75"

2'-9

"

19'-2

.75"

19'-5

.25"

19'-8

.5"

1'-1

0.25

"

1'-6.75"

1'-1

0.25

"

1'-6.75"

1'-5

.25"

1'-7"

47

3

5

5

34

7

Scal

e

Dra

wn

by

Dat

e

Proj

ect n

umbe

rAs

sign

men

t 09

Kels

ey B

raun

Ian

McG

eeSa

hil K

hakh

arSt

eve

Belt

Julie

Sor

ense

n

Nov

. 20,

201

6

A9-1

No.

Des

crip

tion

Dat

e

Fabr

icat

ion

Tool

s 1:

M

easu

red

Con

text

s

As In

dica

ted

WES

T EL

EVAT

ION

1/8”

= 1

’4

13'-11.5"9'-5"4'-6.5"

1'

7'-2.5"5'-6.5"

10" 1'3'-1.5"

9'-8

"16

'-1.7

5"4'

-5.7

5"11

'-1"

10'-6

.25"

2'-1

1.25

"1'

-4.5

"2'

-11.

25"

12'-5

"2'

-1.7

5"

1'-7

.75"

1'4'

47'-9

"

SOU

TH E

LEVA

TIO

N1/

8” =

1’

6

4'-6.5" 1'-0.01" 8'-4.91"13'-11.42"

3'-1.5"5.5"

6'2'-5"

28'-7

"8'

-3"

2"2'

-3.5

"2'

-6.7

5"6"

3.25

"

19'-7

.75"

1'-6

.03"

4'-0

.25"

70'-2

.75"

2

EAST

ELE

VATI

ON

31/

8” =

1’

NO

RTH

ELE

VATI

ON

51/

8” =

1’

PLAN

11/

8” =

1’

REF

LEC

TED

CEI

LIN

G P

LAN

1/8”

= 1

’

Gra

phic

s 1

64'-4

.6"

13'-11.5"

1'-0

.5"

7'-3

"3'

-6.4

5"7'

-3"

1'-2.2

5" 1'-8

.25"

1'-1.8

8"

7'-3

"3'

-6.7

5"7'

-3"

1'-2

"

1'-8.2

5"1'-

1.25"

7'-3

"3'

-6.5

"7'

-3"

1'-2.5

2"

63'-1

0.73

"

3'-6

"3'

-1.5

"3'

-1.5

"2'

-9.5

"4'

-7"

12'-6

.5"

3'-1

0.5"

3'-1

0.5"

3'-1

0.5"

3'-1

0.5"

1'-7

"3'

-10.

25"

3'-1

0.23

"3'

-10.

22"

5'-1

.5"

3'-1

0"1'

-11.

25"1

'-6"

1'

28'-7

.73"

13'-4

.75"

13'-11.5"

8'-5"1'

9'-0.5"

6'

47'-9

"

8 9

6

7SE

CTI

ON

I

N

1'-11.89"

3.42

"

1.46

"

8'-4.55"

9'-7.17"

9'-9.46"2.23"

3.47" 1.94"

1.99"

1.96

"

1.44"2.02"1.92"

12

3

45

6

9

12

3

45678

9

2.1"

1.92"1.98"

2'-0.72"

7"

1'-2

.34" 5

.61"

1.9" 3

.48"

1.26"

6.89

"

7.59

"

3.94"2.11"

1'-10.21"2.55"

INTE

RIO

R W

ALL

SEC

TIO

N1/

4” =

1’

EXTE

RIO

R W

ALL

SEC

TIO

N1/

4” =

1’

13'-9.31"1'-9.76"2'-2.31"

1'-0.19"7"

7'-4.19"5'-2.91"

2'-6.22"

58'-0

.17"

5.61

"

5'-9

.09"

2'-6

.51"

4.6"

11.1

9"1'

-2.7

2"2'

-2.9

3"

13'-8

"1'

56

7

8

9

11

2

10

1112

3

4

LEG

END

8 - I

NTE

RIO

R W

ALL

SEC

TIO

N

1 - G

YPSU

M B

OAR

D2

- STE

EL S

TUD

S3

- AC

OU

STIC

AL C

EILI

NG

TIL

ES4

- Q-D

ECK

5 - C

ON

CR

ETE

SLAB

6 - R

IGID

INSU

LATI

ON

7 - A

LUM

INU

M W

IND

OW

FR

AME

8 - R

ED B

RIC

K VE

NEE

R9

- STE

EL J

OIS

T

9 - E

XTER

IOR

WAL

LSE

CTI

ON

1 - G

YPSU

M B

OAR

D2

- STE

EL S

TUD

S3

- AC

OU

STIC

AL C

EILI

NG

TIL

ES4

- Q-D

ECK

5 - C

ON

CR

ETE

SLAB

6 - R

IGID

INSU

LATI

ON

7 - A

LUM

INU

M W

IND

OW

FR

AME

8 - R

ED B

RIC

K VE

NEE

R9

- STE

EL J

OIS

T

10 -

SEC

TIO

N I

1 - G

YPSU

M B

OAR

D2

- FAB

RIC

AC

OU

STIC

AL W

ALL

PAN

EL3

- STE

EL S

TUD

S4

- AC

OU

STIC

AL C

EILI

NG

TIL

ES5

- Q-D

ECK

6 - C

ON

CR

ETE

SLAB

7 - R

IGID

INSU

LATI

ON

8 - A

LUM

INU

M W

IND

OW

FR

AME

9 - R

ED B

RIC

K VE

NEE

R10

- ST

EEL

JOIS

T11

- ST

EEL

POST

12 -

HVA

C D

UC

T

v

1/8”

= 1

’

4'-6" 1'-6.75" 1'-6.75"

1'-7

.75"

70'-3

.03"

6'-2

.66"

48'-9.17"34'-1.18"

11'-4.75"

49'-8.73" 9'-11"7'

3'-8.77" 1'-0.22"5'

1'-7.44"

FAB

RIC

ATIO

N T

OO

LS

IAN MCGEE31

ARTICULATION

I II III IV

V VI VII VIII

DEFINE A SURFACE MANIPULATE POINTS ON SURFACE

CREATE AN OBJECT WITH SURFICIAL MANIPULATIONS

MORPH THE OBJECT TOTHE SURFACE

CREATE A VORONOIPATTERN FROM A CLOUD OF POINTS

MAP THE VORONOITO THE SURFACE

OFFSET AND EXTRUDE THE VORONOI TO CREATE DEPTH

PLACE THE VORONOISURFACE AND THE MORPHED SURFACETOGETHER

THIS DESIGN CONSIDERS ELEMENTS OF TEXTURE, PATTERN, AND TOPOLOGY IN THE FINAL ITERATION. TEXTURE IS USED IN THEINITIAL SURFACE DESIGN THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A 3-D OBJECT AS TOOL TO CREATE THE PATTERN OF THE SURFACE.PATTERN IS CREATED THROUGH BOTH THE CREATION OF A VORONOI SURFACE AND THE REPETITION OF 3-D GEOMETRY IN THE INITIAL SURFACE. TOPOLOGY IS INFLUENCED BY THE MANIPULATION OF THE INITIAL SURFACE INTO A FORM THAT EMULATESTHE DRAPE OF FABRIC.

DO

CU

ME

NTS

FO

R C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE 32

CONSTRUCTION

Assignment 9C/

TECHNICAL DRAWINGS

Ian McGee

Mateo Rodriguez

Jesse Siegle

Dhruv Soni

12/05/2016

EVDS GRAPHICS

DO

CU

ME

NTS

FO

R C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE33

CONSTRUCTION

SECTION THROUGH ROW B

Scale 1:24

S3

SECTION THROUGH ROW A

Scale 1:24

S2

SECTION THROUGH COLUMN 8

Scale 1:24

S1

DETAIL OF ATTACHMENT SYSTEM

Scale 1: 2

D2COMPONENT TOP ELEVATION

Scale 1: 8

D1

Scale 1: 8

D4COMPONENT SECTION

Scale 1: 8

D3 COMPONENT SECTION

D3

D4

3”

.75” .75”

2”

.75”

1.5”

1.5”

2.5” 3”

Circular “L” Bracket

“L” bracket

Transparent Cast Resin

Aluminum

Laminated Aluminum Panel

Assignment 9C/

TECHNICAL DRAWINGS

Ian McGee

Mateo Rodriguez

Jesse Siegle

Dhruv Soni

12/05/2016

Notes/

Page 5/7

DO

CU

ME

NTS

FO

R C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE 34

CONSTRUCTION

A

B

C

D

E

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

REVERSED CEILING PLAN

Scale 1:24

P1

D2

S2

S3

S4

S5

S6

S2

23’ 4 1/2”

8’ 2 3/8”

11/4”

1’ 7 7/8”

1’ 7 5/8

11/4”

A1

SECTION THROUGH ROW E

Scale 1:24

S7

D1

SECTION THROUGH ROW D

Scale 1:24

S6

SECTION THROUGH ROW C

Scale 1:24

S4

Assignment 9C/

TECHNICAL DRAWINGS

Ian McGee

Mateo Rodriguez

Jesse Siegle

Dhruv Soni

12/05/2016

Notes/

Page 4/7

DO

CU

ME

NTS

FO

R C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE35

CONSTRUCTION

20.4”

100” 100” 81.75”

19.7

96.1875”

D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d lA 1.60 0.16 0.81 4.80 1.52 1.49 0.76 4.47 1.46 1.39 0.73 4.16 1.38 1.29 0.69 3.88 1.31 1.21 0.65 3.62 1.25 1.13 0.63 3.40 1.20 1.07 0.60 3.20 1.16 1.02 0.58 3.05 1.12 0.98 0.56 2.93 1.10 0.95 0.55 2.85 1.09 0.94 0.55 2.81 1.10 0.94 0.55 2.81 1.12 0.95 0.56 2.86 1.14 0.98 0.57 2.94B 1.52 1.47 0.76 4.40 1.41 1.35 0.71 4.05 1.33 1.24 0.66 3.73 1.25 1.14 0.63 3.43 1.19 1.05 0.59 3.16 1.12 0.97 0.56 2.92 1.07 0.91 0.53 2.72 1.02 0.85 0.51 2.55 0.98 0.81 0.49 2.42 0.96 0.78 0.48 2.34 0.95 0.77 0.48 2.30 0.96 0.77 0.48 2.30 0.97 0.78 0.48 2.35 0.99 0.81 0.50 2.44C 1.42 1.34 0.71 4.01 1.32 1.22 0.66 3.65 1.23 1.10 0.61 3.31 1.14 1.00 0.57 3.00 1.06 0.90 0.53 2.71 0.99 0.82 0.50 2.46 0.94 0.75 0.47 2.24 0.89 0.69 0.44 2.06 0.85 0.64 0.42 1.93 0.82 0.61 0.41 1.83 0.81 0.60 0.41 1.79 0.81 0.60 0.41 1.79 0.83 0.61 0.41 1.84 0.85 0.65 0.43 1.94D 1.32 1.21 0.66 3.64 1.22 1.09 0.61 3.26 1.12 0.97 0.56 2.91 1.03 0.86 0.51 2.58 0.94 0.76 0.47 2.27 0.87 0.67 0.44 2.00 0.81 0.59 0.40 1.77 0.75 0.53 0.38 1.58 0.71 0.48 0.36 1.43 0.69 0.44 0.34 1.33 0.67 0.43 0.34 1.29 0.67 0.43 0.34 1.29 0.69 0.45 0.35 1.35 0.72 0.48 0.36 1.45E 1.22 1.10 0.61 3.29 1.11 0.96 0.56 2.89 1.01 0.84 0.51 2.52 0.92 0.72 0.46 2.17 0.83 0.62 0.41 1.85 0.75 0.52 0.37 1.56 0.68 0.44 0.34 1.31 0.62 0.37 0.31 1.11 0.58 0.32 0.29 0.96 0.55 0.28 0.28 0.89 0.54 0.26 0.27 0.86 0.54 0.26 0.27 0.85 0.56 0.28 0.28 0.90 0.59 0.32 0.29 0.97

11 12 13 146 7 8 9 101 2 3 4 5

LIST OF COMPONENTS

A

B

C

D

E

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

d

x 2

x 70x 70

d

l

L

d

D

D x 3.14

2”

1”

C2

LIST OF COMPONENT DIMENSIONSC1

ASSEMBLY DIAGRAM

Assignment 9C/

TECHNICAL DRAWINGS

Ian McGee

Mateo Rodriguez

Jesse Siegle

Dhruv Soni

12/05/2016

Notes/

Page 7/7

A1Scale 1:24

DO

CU

ME

NTS

FO

R C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE 36

MODEL

DO

CU

ME

NTS

FO

R C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

N

IAN MCGEE 36

MODEL