gravity survey and depth to bedrock in carson valley, nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to...

24
Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada-California By Douglas K. Maurer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4202 Prepared in cooperation with the DOUGLAS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Caraoa City, Nevada ~ 1986

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada-California

By Douglas K. Maurer

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4202

Prepared in cooperation with the

DOUGLAS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

Caraoa City, Nevada

~ 1986

Page 2: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Dallas L. Peck, Director

For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from:

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Sendees SectionRoom 227, Federal Building U.S. Geological Survey705 North Plaza Street Box 25425, Federal CenterCarson City,NV 89701 Denver, CO 80225

Call (303) 236-7476 for ordering information

Page 3: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

CONTENTS

Page

ABSTRACT 1

INTRODUCTION 1

GEOLOGIC SETTING 1

METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION AND REDUCTION 2

ERRORS IN GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS 4Measurement Errors 4Interpretive Errors 4

INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITY DATA 5

SUMMARY 6

PRINCIPAL FACTS FOR GRAVITY STATIONS 7

REFERENCES CITED 19

ILLUSTRATIONS

[Plates are in pocket at back of the report]

Plate 1, 2. Maps showing:

1. Gravity stations, complete Bouguer gravity, and regional Bouguer gravity

2. Depth to bedrock

Page 4: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

CONVERSION FACTORS AND ABBREVIATIONS

"Inch-pound" units of measure used in this report may be converted to International System (metric) units by using the following factors:

Multiply By To obtain

Acre-feet (acre-ft) 1,233 Cubic meters (m3)Feet (ft) 0.3048 Meters (m)Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers (km)

Geophysical and related units used in this report are as follows:

For gravity, milliGals (mGal).For density, grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm3).

ALTITUDE DATUM

The term "National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929" replaces the formerly used term "mean sea level" to describe the datum for altitude measurements. The datum is derived from a general adjustment of the first-order leveling networks of both the United States and Canada. For convenience in this report, the datum also is referred to as "sea level."

Page 5: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

GRAVITY SURVEY AND DEPTH TO BEDROCK

IN CARSON VALLEY, NEVADA-CALIFORNIA

By Douglas K. Maurer

ABSTRACT

Gravity data were obtained from 460 stations in Carson Valley, Nevada and California. The data have been interpreted to obtain a map of approximate depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates the shape of the alluvium-filled basin and shows that the maximum depth to bedrock exceeds 5,000 feet, on the west side of the valley. A north- south trending offset in the bedrock surface shows that the Carson-Valley/ Pine-Nut-Mountain block has not been tilted to the west as a simple unit, but is comprised of several smaller blocks.

INTRODUCTION

Carson Valley is the major storage reservoir of high-quality ground water in the Carson River basin (Glancy and Katzer, 1975, page 15). Ground water is a source of supply for the rapidly expanding urban population and for agricultural production a major economic base of the area. To assess the impact of these demands on the ground-water system in Carson Valley, data on the size and configuration of the reservoir are needed. Glancy and Katzer (1975, page 13) note that several wells as deep as 1,000 feet fail to penetrate basement beneath the valley fill; thus, the depth to bedrock is unknown throughout most of the valley.

The purpose of this study, made during the period from April 1980 through March 1981, was to determine the thickness of valley fill in Carson Valley using gravimetric geophysical methods. A gravity survey measures differences in the Earth 1 s gravitational field over the study area, and depth to bedrock can be calculated from these measurements.

GEOLOGIC SETTING

Carson Valley is bounded on the west by a steep, normal fault scarp with 5,000 feet of relief from the valley floor to the crest of the Carson Range (plate 1). The east side of the valley rises gently toward the crest of the Pine Nut Range through a fault system as much as 6 miles in width. The valley narrows to, the north where the Carson River drains the valley and to the south where the West Fork of the Carson River enters.

The mountain blocks bounding the valley to the east and west are westward-tilted structural units (Stewart, 1980, page 113), with Carson Valley occupying the downdropped western edge of the Pine Nut block (Moore, 1969, page 18). Recent westward tilting of the Pine Nut block is shown by faulting

-1-

Page 6: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

along the east scarp of the Carson Range (Pease, 1979, page 15) and by displacement of the Carson River to the west side of Carson Valley (Moore, 1969, page 18).

The Carson Range is composed mainly of Cretaceous granodiorite (Pease, 1979, page 2). The crest of the Pine Nut Range is also composed of granodi­ orite, probably similar to that found in the Carson Range (Moore, 1969, page 18). In both ranges, some Triassic-Jurassic metavolcanic and medasedi- mentary rocks are exposed (Moore, 1969, page 16; Armin and others, 1983). Lower on the western flanks of the Pine Nut Range, Tertiary lake and stream deposits crop out and dip westward beneath the alluvial fill of Carson Valley (Moore, 1969, page 19).

In the north and south ends of the valley, the granodiorite and metavolcanic rocks form isolated bedrock knobs in the hills east of Jacks Valley, at Hot Springs Mountain, and in the hills south of Dresslerville (Moore, 1969). A large exposure of Tertiary volcanic rocks, mostly andesitic flows and breccia (Moore, 1969; Stewart and Noble, 1979), is located near the southeast end of the valley.

The Tertiary lake and stream deposits are variable in their degree of induration (Pease, 1979, page 4). They are described as soft sediments by Moore (1969, page 19), and as shales, siltstones, and sandstones by Stewart and Noble (1979). They are predominantly fine grained and similar in compo­ sition to the Pliocene Truckee Formation near Virginia City, Nev., 20 miles north of Carson Valley (Moore, 1969, page 13). Thus, these deposits probably form a hydrologic unit underlying Carson Valley. Moore (1969, page 19) suggests a total thickness of several hundred feet for the Tertiary sediments, and Robert C. Pease (1981, Nevada Bureau of Mines Geology, written communication) stated that 600 feet of Tertiary sediments are exposed in the hills east of Jacks Valley.

Sediments of Quaternary and Tertiary age probably form the major hydrologic unit in Carson Valley. The sediments range in lithology from fine-grained, flood-plain deposits of the Carson River on the valley floor to coarse Tertiary gravel, capping the semiconsolidated Tertiary sediments on the west flank of the Pine Nut Range.

Because water wells are drilled in both the Tertiary lake and stream deposits and in the unconsolidated Quaternary sediments, both will be treated as valley fill for purposes of gravity modeling.

METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION AND REDUCTION

The gravity measured by the gravity meter is in part determined by the density of materials which lie beneath it. A reading taken over a section of low density valley-fill deposits that overlie more dense crystalline bedrock is less than if the bedrock composed the entire section. This difference is referred to as a gravity anomaly. Corrections are made for altitude, latitude, earth curvature, and terrain roughness; and a value is computed for the measurement called a Bouguer anomoly. Measurements made over bedrock stations

2

Page 7: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

reflect differences in the bedrock densities and the same corrections are applied to obtain a Bouguer anomoly for these stations. Bedrock stations on both sides of a valley define a regional gravity gradient. Subtracting the regional gradient from Bouguer anomolies measured over the valley fill gives a residual anomoly which is proportional to the thickness of the valley-fill material.

Gravity readings were taken at 460 stations (plate 1) in the study area at approximately a half-mile spacing. Most of the stations were located using topographic maps at a scale of 1:4,800 with a 5-foot contour interval. These maps, prepared for the Carson Valley Conservation District by Genge Aerial Surveys, Sacramento, Calif., permitted a location accuracy of 25 feet and a station altitude accuracy of ±1.5 feet. Sixty of the station altitudes were taken from preliminary U.S. Geological Survey topographic sheets (scale, 1:24,000), where altitudes of road intersections and hilltops were photo- grammetrically determined within ±6 feet. Four of the station altitudes on the east side of the valley were interpolated from contours on U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps (scale, 1:62,500) where altitudes were determined to an accuracy of ±12 feet.

A Texas Instruments Model-Ill^ gravity meter, with a scale constant of 0.0965 mGal (milliGal) per scale division, was used for the survey. This scale constant allowed readings to the nearest 0.01 mGal. A gravity base station used in this study, ACIC-2358-1, is located at the Douglas County Airport. The observed gravity of 979,606.24 mGal (Chapman's [1966] datum by Plouff, 1982), was used to tie in all stations. This base was read three times a day to provide corrections for tide and instrument drift.

The gravity readings were reduced to observed gravity and then converted to Bouguer anomalies using a computer program written by Plouff (1977). The program uses the International Gravity Formula of 1930 to calculate the anomaly, and applies corrections to the readings for altitude, latitude, earth curvature, and terrain from 1.42 to 103.6 miles from the station. A geographic grid interval of 1 minute was used for the digital terrain model. Terrain corrections from 0 to 1.42 miles were estimated by hand, using the Hayford-Bowie (1912, page 43) template. Hand terrain corrections were a maximum of 20 mGal along the crest of the Carson Range. The section titled "Gravity Data" lists the observed gravity and Bouguer gravity anomolies for the stations. The observed gravity data are also included in a regional gravity survey by Oliver and others (1982).

A computer program was then used to grid and contour the anomalies on a half-mile grid spacing. Nineteen readings were taken at stations on bedrock and Bouguer anomalies at these stations were contoured separately, by hand, to delineate the regional gradient of the gravity field. Lines of equal Bouguer gravity and the regional gradient are shown on plate 1. The regional gradient was then subtracted from the Bouguer anomolies to obtain residual anomalies, which should reflect the thickness of valley fill.

^ The use of brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

-3-

Page 8: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Densities of 2.67, 2.00, and 1.70 g/cm^ (grams per cubic centimeter) were then assigned to bedrock, alluvium, and Tertiary sediments, respectively. A bedrock density of 2.67 g/cm3 is the standard value used for gravity surveys (Zohdy and others, 1979, page 90) and is an average of density values obtained by Pease (1979) for metamorphic and granitic rocks in the Carson Range. A density of 2.00 g/cm3 is used for valley-fill sediments by other authors in the Great Basin (Gimlett, 1967, page 18; Healey, 1970, page B52; Eaton and Watkins, 1970, page 545). The 1.70 g/cm3 value for Tertiary sediments was obtained from Pease (1979, page 19), who measured the density of sediments in Carson Valley, and from Gimlett (1967, page 18), who measured the density of sediments of the Truckee Formation which, as discussed previously, are similar to the Tertiary sediments found in Carson Valley.

The densities and residual gravity anomalies on a half-mile grid spacing were used as input to a three-dimensional inversion program from Cordell (1970). Using this program, depth to bedrock was calculated on a half-mile grid throughout the valley. The program was run once using a density contrast of 0.67 g/m3 and again with a density contrast of 0.97 g/m3 to obtain estimates of depths to bedrock on the east side of the valley where the less dense Tertiary sediments probably compose the entire valley-fill section. Depths obtained were then hand-contoured to obtain a depth-to- bedrock map (plate 2).

ERRORS IN GRAVITY MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS

Measurement Errors

The accuracy of the Bouguer gravity anomalies is limited by accuracy of the station altitudes and their horizontal positioning, and by repeatability of the readings.

Repeat readings were taken at 40 stations. Fifteen percent agreed within 0.03 mGal of the original reading, 60 percent agreed within 0.10 mGal, 98 percent agreed within 0.25 mGal, and 100 percent were within 0.49 mGal. Most station altitudes are known to the nearest 3 feet, giving a 0.18-mGal error; positions are known to within 25 feet, giving a 0.01-mGal error. Thus, the total error of each anomaly can be approximately 0.20 mGal. The maximum repeat error of 0.49 mGal occuring within the 0.20-mGal error possible for each anomaly gives a total "worst case" error of 0.69 mGal in observed gravity.

As a check on the accuracy of the calculated depths, the "worst case" error of 0.69 mGal was added to and subtracted from the values of the residual anomalies along a profile through the deepest part of the valley. The resultant depths differed from those calculated using the actual residuals by an average of 107 feet and by a maximum of 180 feet out of a total depth of about 5,000 feet.

Interpretive Errors

Errors in the interpretation of gravity data can occur as a result of (1) the assumed density assignments, (2) the assumption that densities of alluvial fill and basement are uniform, and (3) the validity of regional gravity contouring.

-4-

Page 9: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

The computer program used to calculate depth to bedrock does not take into account varying densities with depth that might be significant if the less dense Tertiary sediments underlie the valley-fill materials. A thick section of less dense material would, in effect, increase the density contrast between bedrock and valley-fill materials, resulting in shallower calculated depths to bedrock. On the other hand, densities of valley fill probably increase with depth of burial, causing a decrease in density contrast. These two factors would tend to compensate for each other on the west side of the valley, where a thick section of unconsolidated valley-fill probably overlies less dense Tertiary sediments. In either case, the change in calculated depth to bedrock is relatively small. If the entire section consisted of less dense Tertiary sediments on the west side of the valley, the difference in calcu­ lated depths to bedrock is less than 30 percent. Drillers' logs show that valley-fill materials are at least 1,000 feet thick on the west side of the valley. Thus, errors in calculated depths to bedrock due to unknown horizon­ tal density variations are significantly less than 30 percent. Known lateral variations in density are corrected as described in the section, "Methods of Data Collection and Reduction."

Errors in contouring the regional gravity gradient are related to the uncertainty of large hand terrain corrections required for bedrock stations taken on mountain peaks and to estimation of the regional gradient over the center of the valley where no bedrock reading can be taken. Hand terrain correction errors may be as large as 2 mGal, and the error of estimating the regional gradient may approach 10 mGal. The latter could result in an error of 20 percent in calculated depth to bedrock. Estimating the regional gradient over large valleys is a problem inherent in all gravity studies. If calculated depths correspond closely to known depths, this error is probably small.

INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITY DATA

The distribution of Bouguer anomalies in Carson Valley follows the general trends shown by Erwin and Berg (1977) and Oliver and others (1982). Lines of equal depth to bedrock are shown on plate 2. The most conspicuous feature is a deep, elongate basin beneath the western half of Carson Valley. The depth of fill beneath Carson Valley exceeds 5,000 feet at a location about 2 miles southeast of Walleys Hot Springs. North of this basin, a bedrock high extends under Hobo Hot Springs to just south of Stewart, forming a separate basin beneath Jacks Valley up to 1,400 feet deep.

The steep gravity gradient on the east side of the basin implies offset of the basement. The offset extends from the west margin of Hot Springs Mountain to the Minden-Gardnerville area, with about 2,000 feet of relief. This north-trending scarp and the mapped zone of faulting on the east side of the valley imply that the Carson-Valley/Pine-Nut-Mountain block has not been tilted as a unit but is composed of at least two separate parts.

Depth to bedrock in the east half of the valley averages about 1,000 feet. A bedrock high extends south from Hot Springs Mountain about 3 miles. A basin with a maximum depth of 2,900 feet occurs east of this bedrock high. Bedrock beneath Fish Spring Flat appears to be relatively flat

-5-

Page 10: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

and varies from 600 to 800 feet in depth. Two smaller basins occur between Fish Spring Flat and Gardnerville; the northern basin is 1,900 feet deep and the southern one 1,600 feet deep. These basins are separated from the main western basin by a ridge with 200 to 300 feet of relief.

The depth-to-bedrock configuration in plate 2 is consistent with well logs in the valley. Wells penetrating more than 20 feet of bedrock are plotted on plate 2 along with the depth where bedrock was first encountered. The depths correspond with calculated depths, and no wells were found to exceed calculated depths. The well penetrating bedrock at 750 feet was drilled after this interpretation was completed and tends to confirm the density contrasts assigned to valley-fill and bedrock materials.

SUMMARY

Data from 460 gravity stations in Carson Valley have been interpreted to obtain a map of approximate depth to bedrock, and the shape of the buried basin. The data show that the Carson-Valley/Pine-Nut-Mountain block has been tilted as two or more separate blocks. A structural scarp trends north-south near the center of the valley creating a deep, elongate basin under the west half of the valley and a relatively flat bench on the east.

Interpreted maximum depths show about 5,000 feet of fill on the west sideof the basin and a thickness of over 2,000 feet for Tertiary sediments on theeast side of the basin.

-6-

Page 11: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

PRINCIPAL FACTS FOR

GRAVITY STATIONS

-7-

Page 12: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

I 00

Terr

ain

co

rre

ctio

n:

"Hand"

ind

ica

tes

manual

corr

ection w

ith

inof

2.6

7

g/c

nr*

(g

ram

s per

cu

bic

centim

ete

r).

an

d

of

10

3.6

m

iles,

at

a bedro

ck d

en

sity

of

2corr

ection in

m

illiG

als

.B

ouguer

an

om

aly

: C

om

ple

te

Bouguer

anom

aly

at

a

Altitu

de

Latitu

de

Lo

ng

itu

de

(f

eet

above

sea

Sta

tio

n

(deg

min

) (d

eg

m

in)

level)

CU

SC

V

01

59

0.1

8

119

45

.46

J4700.0

CU

SC

V

C2

39

2

.65

1

19

46.6

0

46

54

.0C

US

CV

0

3

39

4

.21

1

19

46.6

6

46

4S

.OC

US

CV

0

4

39

5.1

6

11

9

46.4

3

i 4

74

3.0

CU

SC

V0

5

39

6.1

1

11

94

6.3

6

4911.0

CU

SC

V

06

39

6.8

3

11

9

46

.88

4

83

6.0

CU

SC

V

07

3

9

6.7

8

11

9

51

.41

,

5938.0

CU

SC

V

08

39

6.7

3

119

50

.50

5

66

5.0

CU

SC

V

0?

3

9

7.0

6

119

46

.00

'

47

40

.0C

US

CV

10

39

7

.01

1

19

45.2

8

47

13

.0C

US

CV

11

3

9

1.1

3

119

50

.05

4

73

4.0

CU

SC

V

12

39

0.2

8

11

9

50

.58

4

78

9.0

CU

SC

V

13

38

59

.78

1

19

47.2

3

4687.0

CU

SC

V

14

38

59.8

0

119

48.1

0

46

73

.0C

US

CV

15

38

5

9.8

1

11

9

48.7

0

4670.0

CU

SC

V

16

38

59.9

0

11

9

49

.41

4670.0

CU

SC

V

17

39

0

.15

119

50

.13

j

4676.0

CU

SC

V

18

3

8

58

.76

1

19

49.9

8

46

94

.0C

US

CV

1

9

33

57.8

5

119

50.2

8

4725.0

CU

SC

V

20

38

5

7.4

5

11

9

50.3

1

47

41

.0C

US

CV

21

3

8

56

.93

1

19

5

0.4

3

47

59

.0C

US

CV

22

38

55.9

1

119

50.3

6

4705.0

CU

SC

V

23

38

55

.05

1

19

4

9.9

8

47

94

.0C

US

CV

24

38

5

8.2

5

119

47.9

0

4688.0

CU

SC

V

25

38

58.2

6

11

9

49

.01

4

67

8.0

CU

SC

V

26

38

58.2

6

119

49

.83

4

67

6.0

CU

SC

V

27

38

57

.36

1

19

46.7

0

4705.0

CU

SC

V

28

38

56.2

1

119

46

.70

4716.0

CU

SC

V

29

3

3

55

.95

1

19

46.7

0

4718.0

CU

SC

V

3C

38

54

.86

119

46.7

0

47

18

.0C

US

CV

31

38

5

4.6

3

119

46

.70

4

72

0.0

CU

SC

V

32

38

54.6

1

119

47

.80

4

71

5. t

oC

US

CV

33

38

54

.63

119

48

.80

4

70

7.0

CU

SC

V

34

38

54.1

8

119

46.7

0

47

29

.0,

CU

SC

V

35

39

5

.93

119

47

.03

4

90

0.0

"Co

mp

" in

dic

ate

sa

radiu

s

of

1.4

2 m

iles,

at

aco

mp

ute

r corr

ection

be

twe

en

bedro

ck

de

nsity

rad

ii

of

1.4

2.6

7

g/c

m3

. "T

ota

l" in

dic

ate

s

ma

nu

al

plu

s

com

pute

r te

rra

in

bedro

ck density

of

2.6

7

g/c

m3

. Te

rra

in

co

rre

ctio

nO

bse

rve

dgra

vity

(mG

al)

'97

96

04

. 49

97

96

12

.23

979620.

7597961 5

.9

7979605.

26979610.

489

79

54

3.7

79

79

55

9.9

497961 7

.43

97

96

21

.4

1979614.1

0979606.7

8979599.5

8979601 .

08

979603.0

6979607.3

6979612.0

39

79

60

2.3

9979599.1

0979599.1

0979593.

16979588.9

7979585,1

0979592.6

1979595.0

5979598.8

69

79

59

3.9

0979573.

18979592.9

4979591 .

43

979590.8

6979589.7

9.9

79591 .

18

979589.5

1979603.6

8

Fre

e-a

iranom

aly

(mG

al)

-45

.78

-46

.00

i -4

0.3

4-3

7.

59-3

3.9

0-3

6.7

90

. 15

-9.2

7-3

9.

20-3

7.

69-3

4.

37-3

5.2

7-5

1 .

33

-51

.17

-49

. 49

I -4

5.3

21

-40

.45

-46.

36

-45.

40-4

3.

31-4

6.7

9-5

4.

56-4

8.8

0-5

5.9

5-5

4.4

7-5

0.8

5-5

1.7

6-6

9.7

5-4

9.4

2-4

9.3

3-4

9.

37-5

0.8

8-5

0.2

8-4

9.2

2-3

6.2

5

Han

d C

omp

0.0

1

"l.5

5

10

.01

1

.98

0.2

3

2.1

00.5

0

1 .9

10

.07

1

.72

1.3

6

2.2

24

.92

3

.96

1.3

5

3.7

70.2

4

' 2.0

00

.05

1

.78

1.3

8

5.9

63

.92

i

6.5

60

.01

2

.13

0.0

1

2.6

80

.01

3

.25

0.1

9

4.3

50.9

6

5.9

04

.96

5.2

32

.22

5

.82

2.6

8

j 5.9

82

.64

6.4

40.0

1

7.3

20

.42

6.8

20.0

1

2.6

00.1

6

3.6

60

.97

5.0

30.0

1

2.0

60

.01

2.2

30

.01

2.2

80.0

1

2.5

70

.01

2.6

50

.01

3.5

50

.04

4.9

30.0

1

2.8

00.1

4

2.0

1

Tota

l

1 .5

61

.99

2.3

32

.41

1.7

93

.58

8.8

85

.12

2.2

41

.83

7.3

41

0.4

82

.14

2.6

93

.26

4.5

46

.86

10

. 19

8.0

48

.66

9.0

87.3

37

.24

2.6

13

.82

6.0

02

.07

2.2

42.2

92

.58

2.6

63.5

64

.97

2.8

12

.15

Bo

ug

ue

ra

no

ma

ly(m

Gal)

-205.8

9-2

04

.11

-197.9

1-1

98

.32

-201.0

2-1

99

.54

-194.9

9-1

98.8

4-2

00

.01

-19

7.9

8-1

89

.87

-18

9.5

1-2

1 0

.42

-20

9.2

3-2

06

.88

-20

1.4

3-1

94.4

5-1

97

.64

-19

9.8

9-1

97

.72

-20

1.4

0-2

09

.07

-20

6.4

5-2

1 4

.61

-211.5

7-2

05

.70

-21 1

.53

-21 1

.37

-209.4

2-2

09.0

4-2

09.0

7-2

09

.51

-20

7.2

2-2

09.0

8-2

02.6

3

Page 13: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

I NO

L

Sta

tion

(d

CU

SC

V

36

CU

SC

V

37

CU

SC

V

38

CU

SC

V

39

CU

SC

V

40

CU

SC

V

41C

US

CV

42

CU

SC

V

43

CU

SC

V

44

CU

SC

V

45

CU

SC

V

46

CU

SC

V

47

CU

SC

V

48

CU

SC

V

49

CU

SC

V

5CC

US

CV

51

CU

SC

V

52

CU

SC

V

53

CU

SC

V

54

CU

SC

V

55

CU

SC

V

56

CU

SC

V

57

CU

SC

V

58

CU

SC

V

59

CU

SC

V

60

CU

SC

V

61C

US

CV

6

2C

US

CV

63

CU

SC

V

64

CU

SC

V

65

CU

SC

V

66

CU

SC

V

67

CU

SC

V

68

CU

SC

V

69

CU

SC

V

7CC

US

CV

71

CU

SC

V

72

CU

SC

V

73

CU

SC

V

74

CU

SC

V

75

atitu

de

L

Bg

min

) (

39

5

.60

39

5.3

539

5.7

739

5.5

739

5.3

339

5.4

039

4.9

339

4.4

339

4.0

13?

3.4

739

2.6

53

9

2.1

73

9

0.0

73

9

0.0

733

59.3

03?

P .

6 3

59

1

. <

.f3

9

0.4

33

9

0.1

83

3

59

.78

I

3S

59.4

33

8

59.1

33

8

56

.48

38

55.5

038

55.5

03

3

54.6

338

54

.10

38

5

3.8

73

8

53

.55

38

5

3.1

53

8

52

.75

38

52.9

23

8

53

.02

38

52.3

33

8

52

.03

33

52

.02

38

51

.5

738

52

.02

38

51.9

83

3

52

.45

Altitu

de

ongitude

(feet

above

sea

le

g

min

) le

vel)

119

47

.07

| 4970.0

119

47

.60

4993.0

1 19

47

.52

4905.0

11

9

48.1

7

50

04

.01

19

48.8

3

51 5

0.0

1 19

49.5

3

51 7

3.0

11

9

49

.08

5

05

3.0

1 1

9

49

.22

4954.0

1 1

9

49.2

0

4960.0

1 19

4

9.2

3

49

53

.01

19

49

.52

4810.0

1 19

49

.77

4

75

3.0

11

9

46

.15

4694.0

11

9

46

.72

4

68

4.0

1 19

46

.72

4

68

4.

01

19

5

0.4

8

47

71

.0

119

S0.1

2

47

74

.01

19

50.0

3

4677.0

11

9

48.9

0

4669.0

1 1

9

50.4

3

4727.0

1 19

50

.17

|

46 9

8.0

11

9

49

.93

4685.0

119

50

.62

4762.0

19

50.2

5

4794.0

19

50

.72

4921.0

19

49.8

5

48

10

.019

49.5

3

48

25

.01

9

49.3

0

4805.0

19

49.1

0

4800.0

19

49

.08

4790.0

19

49.0

0

47

75

.019

48.4

3

47

24

.0119

48

.07

4

73

2.0

11

9

48.5

8

4806.0

1 1

9

48.0

6

4837.0

1 1

9

47.5

2

4791 .

0119

47.2

8

49

12

.01

19

47.0

5

47

76

.01

19

4

6.6

3

4790.0

11

9

46.6

3

4766.0

Ob

serv

ed

gra

vity

(mG

al)

97

95

99

.99

97

96

05

.07

97

96

02

.91

97

95

97

.33

97

95

90

.21

97

95

88

. 5

89

79

59

4.8

29

79

60

0.

23

979601 .

54

97

96

02

.96

97

96

1 0

.96

97

96

1 3

.09

97

96

01

.8

5979600.

79

P79599.4

59

79

61

0.4

19

79

61

2 .

52

97

96

1 3

.24

97

96

07

.21

979607 .

21

97

96

06

.07

97

96

04

.81

97

95

86

.86

979587.8

9979577.9

39

79

58

3.3

19

79

58

2.0

4979582.9

49

79

58

2.5

29

79

58

0.8

19

79

57

8.5

79

79

58

3.8

39

79

58

5.1

7979576.9

4979580.1

2979584.5

99

79

58

4.

74

97

95

86

.98

97

95

87

.35

97

95

88

.73

Fre

e-a

ira

no

ma

ly

(mG

al)

-32

.88

-25

. 27

-36

.32

-31

.75

-25

.34

1

-24

.91

-29

.26

-32

.42

!

-29

.93

-28

.37

-3?.

61-3

5.1

3-4

8.8

3

:-5

0.8

?

'-5

1 .

77

-33

.35

-3?.

71-3

9.5

6-4

5.9

8-3

9.9

4-3

3.8

9-4

5.

33-5

2.

1 5

-46

.67

-44

.69

-48

.46

-47

.55

-48.

19

-48

.61

-50

.67

-53

.73

-53

.52

-51

. 5

7-5

1.8

3-4

5.

30

-45

.1 4

-32

.95

-44

. 1

6-4

2.4

1-4

3.9

8

Te

rra

Han

d

0.2

43.3

10

.34

0.9

50.6

21

.60

0.3

80

.34

0.2

90

.55

2.2

43

.29

0.0

10.0

10.0

11

. 9

92.8

60.4

70

.01

4.5

37.0

93.0

83

.35

0.6

62

.40

0.6

10

.57

0.4

90.5

91 .2

62

.45

0.3

20.0

31

.45

0.3

20.0

90

.08

0.0

20

.01

0.0

1

in co

rre

ct

Com

p

1 .8

72.0

92.2

52

.45

2.6

73

.39

3.1

23.6

43.6

73

.87

4.9

05.5

71

. 71

1 .9

11

. 91

6.

63

6.

18

5.

79

3.5

26.1

55

.26

5.1

87

.26

7.0

37

.96

7.0

4,

7.0

6!

6.8

86

.94

7.6

58

.27

6.4

05.3

17

.53

6.1

55

.02

4.5

64

.24

3.6

63.4

6

ion

1

To

tal

2.1

1

|5

.40

'

2.5

9

i3.4

0

I3

.29

I

4.9

93

.50

3.9

83.9

64.4

27

. 14

8.8

61

.72

1 .9

21

.92

8.6

29.

046.2

63.5

310.6

81

2.3

58

.26

10.6

17.6

910.3

67.6

57

.63

7.3

77.5

38.9

110.7

26.7

25

.34

8.9

86

.47

5.1

14

.64

4.2

63.6

73.4

7

iou

gu

er

an

om

aly

(m

Ga

l)

-201.6

9-1

91.5

7-2

02

.42

-20

0.4

3-1

99

.1 2

-197.

79

-199.5

2-1

98.8

1-1

96.5

4-1

94.2

9-1

90

.90

-18

9.

76

-20

8.5

7-2

10

.03

-21

0.9

7-1

89.3

3-1

87

.84

-194.1

9-2

03

.06

-19

1 .

85

-18

6.5

7-1

98

.23

-20

5.3

3-2

CT

3.

87

-20

3.5

7-2

06.2

5-2

05

.86

-206.0

9-2

06.1

8-2

06.5

1-2

07.2

5-2

09

.29

-209.0

0-2

08.1

6-2

05.1

9-2

04

.82

-19

7.2

4-2

04

.17

-203.5

0-2

04

.44

Page 14: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

I h- o

Altitude

Latitu

de

Longitude

(fe

et

above

Sta

tio

n

(de

g

min

) (d

eg

min

)

CU

SC

V

76

CU

SC

V

77

CU

SC

V

78

CU

SC

V

79

CU

SC

V

80

CU

SC

V

81C

US

CV

83

CU

SC

V

83

CU

SC

V

84

CU

SC

V

85

CU

SC

V

86

CU

SC

V

87

CU

SC

V

88

CU

SC

V

89

CU

SC

V

90

CU

SC

V

91C

US

CV

92

CU

SC

V

93

CU

SC

V

94

CU

SC

V

95

CU

SC

V

96

CU

SC

V

97

CU

SC

V

93

CU

SC

V

99

CU

SC

V100

CU

SC

V1

01

CU

SC

V102

CU

SC

V1 0

3C

US

CV

104

CU

SC

V105

CU

SC

V1

06

CU

SC

V1

07

CU

SC

V1C

3C

US

CV

109

c u s

c v 1

1 ncu

scvi

i 1

CU

SC

V1

12C

US

CV

1 1

3C

US

CV

1 1

4C

US

CV

1 1

5C

US

CV

1 1

6C

US

CV

1 1

7C

US

CV

1 1

3

33

52.9

033

53.3

33

8

53.7

23

8

54

.62

38

54.6

238

54.6

238

55.8

538

55.9

533

55.9

33

8

55.9

33

8

55

.77

38

55.9

33

8

55.9

33

8

55.9

53

8

55.5

038

55

.07

33

55.5

03

8

55.5

238

55.5

038

55.0

838

54

.63

38

54.6

338

55

. 23

33

5

6.

37

38

56.7

83

8

58.9

83

8

58.5

53

8

58.2

33

8

58.2

33

8

58

. 27

38

5

8.2

73

S

58.2

73

9

5.0

139

4.8

2?9

4.6

25

9

4.0

3?

5

4.2

739

4.6

53

9

4.9

6'3

9

6.4

23

9

0.3

039

0.7

239

1.1

7

11

9

46.6

8119

46.7

01

19

46.7

01

19

47 .

23

11

9

48.1

21

19

49.4

81

19

49.7

5119

49.3

31

19

48.7

21

19

4

8.1

51

19

48.1

31

19

47.5

51

19

47.0

51

19

46.1

71

19

4

6.1

71

19

4

6.1

5119

45.6

71

19

45.1

71

19

44.7

51

19

44

.75

119

45.5

8119

46.1

21

19

46.7

31

19

46

.75

119

46.7

51

19

4

6.7

7119

46

.77

11

9

46.7

5119

47

.32

11

9

48

.50

11

9

49

.52

11

9

50.3

01

19

48.1

71

19

47.6

31

19

48

.10

11

9

48.3

31

19

48

. 55

11

9

48.7

21

19

48.6

21

19

47

.2

51

19

46.7

01

19

46.7

21

19

4

6.7

2

sea

level)

Obse

rved

gra

vity

(mG

al)

47

50

.0

/97

95

88

.6S

4745.0

979588.2

94

73

6.0

I 979588.

78

4718.0

4709.0

4734.0

47

20

.04

69

9.0

46

99

.04700.0

4705.0

4706.0

47

14

.04

72

8.0

47

36

.04733.0

4792.0

47

45

.04

76

6.0

'4

77

2.0

4756.0

4730.0

4721.0

47

13

.04716.0

46

90

.04685.0

4699.0

46

90

.04

68

1 .

04

67

6.0

4697.0

4943.0

5096.0

52

12

.05

24

7.0

53

14

.05

21

0.0

52

45

.04

83

6.0

4680.0

4679.0

4672.0

979589.4

8979590.5

0979588.8

9979593.8

59

79

59

5.1

39

79

59

3.8

1979592.7

5979592.7

6979592.1

4979592.2

09

79

59

5.6

3979594.9

1979594.0

7979598.0

99

79

60

0.0

9979601.3

79

79

60

2.

14

97

95

96

. 79

979593.7

8979591.9

5979593.1

8979593.2

2979596.3

59

79

59

5.1

8979594.6

5979593.1

09

79

59

3.2

3979597.2

69

79

60

1 .

74

97

96

02

.02

979595.8

89

79

58

7.5

99

79

58

5 .

55

979531 .

27

97

95

86

.07

97

95

83

.62

979607.0

59

79

60

1 .

81

97

96

03

.67

97

96

05

.69

Fre

e-a

irT

err

ain

corr

ection

anom

aly

(m

Ga

l)

Han

d

-46.1

9-4

7.6

8-4

8.6

1-5

0.9

3-5

0.7

5-5

0.0

1-4

8.1

8-4

9.0

2-5

0.3

1-5

1 .

27

-50

. 5

6-5

1 .

32

-50

.51

-45

. 79

-45.

10-4

5.

59

-36.6

6-3

9.1

0-3

5.8

2-3

3.8

7-4

0.0

6-4

5.5

1-4

9.0

7-5

0.2

7-5

0.5

5-5

3.

10

-54.

11-5

2.8

5-5

5.2

5-5

6.0

2-5

2.4

6-4

6.0

1-3

2.5

2-2

4.0

0-2

1 .

09

-18.9

7-1

7.3

1-2

2.8

4-2

2.

46

-39

.6?

-50.

52

-49.

37-4

8.6

7

0.0

10

.01

i

0.0

1O

.D1

0.0

10.2

30

.09

'

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.1

00

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10.0

10.0

10

.16

2.8

70.4

90.7

70.5

4Q

.S9

0.7

00.3

60.3

80.6

20.0

10.0

10

.01

Com

p T

ota

l

3.3

1

3.3

23

.13

3.U

2.9

7

2.9

83

.03

3.0

43.9

2

3.9

36.3

4

6.5

75.6

5

5.7

44

.79

4.8

03.8

8

3.8

93.2

6

3.2

73.3

1

3.3

22.7

9

2.8

02

.48

2

.49

2.0

7

2.0

82

.15

2.1

62.2

4

2.2

51.9

2

1.9

31

.84

1

.85

1.7

4

1.7

51

.79

1.8

92.1

1

2.1

22

.34

2

.35

2.4

7

2.4

82.2

3

2.2

42

.15

2

.16

1.9

5

1.9

62.0

0

2.0

11.9

9

2.0

02

.26

2.2

73

.08

3

.09

4.4

5

4.6

15.9

0

8.7

72

.48

2.9

71.9

4

2.7

12.1

2

2.6

62

.27

3.1

62.3

6

3.0

62.5

2

2.8

82

.39

2

.77

2.

38

' 3.0

01.9

1

1.9

21

.91

1

.92

1.9

3

1.9

4

Bo

ug

ue

r anom

aly

(m

Ga

l)

-20

6.2

6-2

07

.76

-208.5

4-2

10.

17

-208.8

1-2

06.2

8-2

04.8

0-2

05

.85

-208.0

6-2

09

.68

-209.0

9-2

10.4

0-2

10

.1 7

-206.3

4-2

05

.85

-20

6.1

4-1

99.5

5-2

00

.46

-198.0

0-1

96.1

1-2

01

.53

-20

5.8

6-2

08

.98

-210.1

4-2

10.6

1-2

1 2

.47

-213.2

6-2

1 2

.49

-214.3

1-2

1 3

.95

-208.

70

-198.8

1-1

99.5

4-1

96

.52

-19

7.6

3-1

96.

20

- 196.9

4-1

99

.09

-20

0.0

1-2

02.9

5-2

09

.59

-20

8.4

0-2

01.4

4

Page 15: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

L

Sta

tio

n

(d

CU

SC

V1

1 9

CU

SC

V1

20

CU

SC

V1

21C

US

CV

1 22

CU

SC

V1

23C

US

CV

12

4C

US

CV

12

5C

US

CV

1 26

CU

SC

V1

27C

US

CV

1 28

CU

SC

V129

CU

SC

V1

30

CU

SC

V1

31C

US

CV

1 32

CU

SC

V133

CU

SC

V1

34C

US

CV

1 35

CU

SC

V1

36C

US

CV

13

7C

U S

C V

1 3

3C

US

CV

1 39

CU

SC

VU

QC

US

CV

U1

CU

SC

V1

42

CU

SC

VU

3C

US

CV

1 44

cusc

vus

CU

SC

VU

6C

US

CV

1 4

7cu

scvu

sC

US

CV

14

9C

US

CV

1 50

CU

SC

V1

51C

US

CV

1 52

CU

SC

V1

53C

US

CV

1 54

CU

SC

V1

55C

US

CV

1 5

6C

US

CV

15

7C

US

CV

1 58

CU

SC

V1

59C

US

CV

1 60

atitu

de

L

on

gitu

de

eg

min

) (d

eg

min

)

39

1 .6

0

11

9

46

.73

39

1.

60

11

9

46.1

83

9

1 .6

0

119

45

.62

39

1

.60

11945 .

06

39

1

.60

11

94

4 .

48

39

1 .6

0

19

43.9

33

9

1 .6

2

19

43

.37

39

1

.60

19

4

2.8

239

2.0

5

19

42 .

80

39

2.4

3

19

42

.82

39

2.9

2

19

42.8

33

9

2.0

3

19

43

.38

39

2.4

8

19

43.3

839

2

.92

19

43.3

83

9

2.4

7

19

43

.93

39

2.0

3

19

43

.95

39

2

.05

1

19

44

.48

38

59.5

3

119

45.6

339

0.5

2

11

9

45

.60

39

0.9

5

119

45

.60

39

1 .3

8

11

9

45.6

03

9

2.0

5

11

9

45.6

23

9

2.4

8

119

45.6

239

2.9

3

11

9

45

.60

39

3.3

5

119

45.6

03

9

2.4

7

119

46.1

73

8

57

.73

1

19

4

6.7

338

59

.52

119

46.7

03

9

2.0

3

1 19

46.7

23

9

2.4

7

119

46

.72

39

2

.48

1

19

4

5.0

53

92

.47

119

44.4

739

2.9

2

119

44.4

83

9

2.9

2

1 19

45.0

539

3

. 35

1

19

4

4.4

739

2.8

7

1 19

4

3.9

339

1

.62

1

19

4

2.2

53

9

1 .0

3

119

42

.73

39

1

.05

1

19

42

.27

39

0.

73

11

9

42.5

03

9

0.7

5

119

41 .

97

39

0.3

2

1 19

42.1

5

Altitu

de

(f

ee

t above

sea

level)

46

66

.04

67

6.0

4679.0

4686.0

4707.0

4746.0

48

10

.04

87

7.0

48

33

.04

85

6.0

49

10

.04776.0

47

93

.04

81

3.0

4726.0

47

23

.04

69

8.0

4701.0

46

91

.0

4684.0

4681.0

46

71

.04

66

5.0

4657.0

4655.0

4660.0

4701.0

46

88

.04

66

6.0

46

56

.04674.0

4693.0

46

96

.04

67

1 .

04

70

5.0

-4

73

4.0

4941 .

04851.0

49

49

.04

86

2.0

49

46

.04874.0

Obse

rved

Fre

e-a

irgra

vity

an

om

aly

(m

Ga

l)

(mG

al)

979607.4

0

-48.1

6979607.3

8

-47

.24

97

96

08

.55

-4

5.7

99

79

60

9.9

2

-43.7

69

79

61

0.8

0

-40.

9f

97

96

11

.44

-3

6.6

0979609.2

5

-32.8

0979609.3

0

-26

.42

979614.6

6

-25

.86

97

96

14

.56

-2

4.3

6979613.0

3

-21.5

39

79

61

3.6

1

-32.2

4979616.0

3

-28

.88

97

96

17

.17

-2

6.5

19

79

61

6.7

8

-34

.42

97

96

14

.42

-3

6.4

1979612.5

2

-40

.69

979603.3

7

-45.8

5979606.0

0

-45

.62

97

96

06

.91

-4

6.0

0979608.0

3

-45

.79

97

96

10

.06

-4

5.6

99

79

61

2.0

4

-44.9

1979613.8

9

-44.4

7979616.1

2

-43

.05

979611.6

0

-45.8

09

79

59

4.2

6

-52.3

2979597.8

0

-52.6

3979608.9

5

-47

.24

979611.4

0

-46.3

8979612.8

8

-43.2

2979614.7

0

-39

. 6C

97

96

17

.00

-3

7.6

8979614.5

9

-42

.44

979618.5

1

-35.9

69

79

61

9.6

1

-31

.42

979612.5

5

-17

.19

979609.2

1

-28.1

29

79

61

0.5

1

-17.6

4979609.7

6

-26.0

9979609.8

6

-18

.13

97

96

09

.57

-2

4.5

5

Te

rra

Ha

nd

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10.0

20

.1 5

0.1

50.7

20.1

00.1

60.5

70

.06

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

20.1

60

.01

0.4

40

.31

0.3

50.0

20.0

10.0

90

.09

0.0

3

tin corr

ection

Com

p T

ota

l

1.9

6

1.9

71

.75

;

1.7

61

.62

^

1.6

31

.52

' 1

.53

1.4

3'

1.4

41

.37

1.3

81

.28

1.2

91

.22

1

.24

1.3

0

1.4

51

.29

1

.44

1.2

3

1.9

51

.36

1

.46

1.3

6

1.5

21

.33

1

.90

1 .4

4

1 .5

01

.43

1

."

1.4

8

1.4

91

.60

1.6

11

.58

1

.59

1.6

0

1.6

11.6

1

1.6

21

.64

1

.65

1.6

7

1.6

81

.71

1

.72

1.7

4

1.7

51.8

1

1.8

22

.03

2

.04

1.9

0

1.9

11

.97

1.9

82.0

1

2.0

21

.58

1

.59

1.5

1

1.5

31

.52

1.6

81.6

1

1.6

21

.52

1

.96

1.4

4

1.7

51

.18

1

.53

1.2

2

1.2

41

.15

1

.16

1.2

0,

1.2

91

.14

1.2

31

.19

'

1.2

2

Bo

ug

ue

ranom

aly

(m

Ga

l)

-20

6.6

9-2

06.3

2-2

05.1

1-2

03.4

2-2

01

.37

-19

8.4

7-1

96

.95

-192.9

2-1

90

.64

-189.9

3-1

88

.45

-19

5.0

6-1

92.2

3-1

90.

16-1

95

.48

-197.4

4-2

00

.81

-20

5.9

5-2

05

.39

-20

5.5

2-2

05.2

0-2

04.7

2-2

03.7

0-2

02.9

5-2

01

.43

-20

4.2

8-2

11

.99

-211.9

8-2

05.7

6-2

04

.52

-202.4

1-1

99

.50

-197.5

3-2

01

.50

-195.8

4-1

92.5

1-1

85

.59

-19

3.7

2-1

86

.68

-192.0

2-1

86

.99

-190

.96

;

Page 16: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Sta

tion

CU

SC

V161

CU

SC

V1

62

CU

SC

V163

CU

SC

V1

64

CU

SC

V165

CU

SC

V1

66

CU

SC

V1

67

CU

SC

Vl

68

CU

SC

V1

69

CU

SC

Vl

70

CU

SC

Vl

71C

US

CV

l 72

'C U

S C

V 1

7 3

CU

SC

V174

CU

SC

V175

CU

SC

V176

CU

SC

V1 7

7C

US

CV

1 7

8C

US

CV

1 79

CU

SC

V180

CU

SC

V1

81C

US

CV

1 8

2C

US

CV

18

3C

US

CV

184

CU

SC

V1

85

-CU

SC

1 8

6C

US

CV

18

7C

US

CV

18

3C

US

CV

1 8

9C

US

CV

19

0C

US

CV

1 91

CU

SC

V1

92

CU

SC

V1

93

CU

SC

V1

94

CU

SC

V195

CU

SC

V1

96

CU

SC

Vl

97

CU

SC

V198

CU

SC

V199

CU

SC

V200

CU

SC

V201

CU

SC

V202

Latitu

de

(deg

min

)

39

0.0

73

8

59.6

73

8

59

.75

33

59.7

939

0.0

63

9

0.7

039

1.0

53

9

1.1

73<

? 0.8

73

9

1 .

333

? 0.5

?3

9

0.8

53

9

0.0

2[3

8

59

.65

I 39

2.9

839

3.2

53

9

3.7

53

9

4.7

339

5.4

83

9

5.4

73

9

4.5

23

9

5.1

23

8

57

.72

3d

57.2

83

8

57

.70

|38

56.5

7|3

8

56

.55

38

56.3

838

56.3

83

8

56.3

83

8

56.3

83

8

56

.96

38

56.6

83

8

56

.37

38

56.8

03

8

57.2

33

8

57.6

538

57.5

738

58

.02

38

58.4

338

58

.47

38

58.0

7

Lo

ng

itu

de

(deg

min

)

11

94

1 .7

21

19

41 .

98

1 19

42.5

01

19

43.1

31

19

43.4

21

19

43.5

3119

43.6

51

19

44

.37

11

94

4 .

92

11

94

5 .

02

11

94

4 .

48

11

9

44 .

02

1 1

9

44.4

71

19

44.4

81

19

46.7

2119

46.7

31

19

46.7

31

19

46.6

31

19

46.4

31

19

47.0

71

19

47.1

3119

47.2

51

19

47.2

21

19

46.0

7119

45.9

21 119

45.9

5!

11

9

45.0

71

19

44.4

81

19

43.9

2119

43.3

71

19

42.9

01

19

42.4

81

19

42.2

31

19

41 .

95

1 1

9

41 .9

51

19

41

.9

51

19

42.0

31

19

41

.4

31

19

41

.6

7119

41 .

67

1 1

9

42.2

2119

42.2

3

Altitu

de

(f

ee

t above

sea

leve

l)

49

12

.04

87

9.0

48

37

.04

79

5.0

4793.0

47

79

.04

77

9.0

4726.0

47

06

.04

69

3.0

4731 .

04

74

4.0

47

24

.04

72

3.0

46

50

.04

65

0.0

46

50

.04685.0

47

95

.04

86

5.0

48

16

.04

79

5.0

46

94

.04717.0

47

13

.04

73

8.0

47

43

.04

75

5.0

47

76

.04

79

5.0

48

26

.04

85

7.0

48

74

.04896.0

48

83

.04

90

5.0

4889.0

49

33

.04

89

7.0

48

98

.04

86

4.0

48

63

.0

Observ

ed

gra

vity

(mG

al)

579607.6

5579605.

51579607 .

24

57

96

10

.05

579609.

10

97

96

10

. 3

39

79

60

9.7

55

79

60

8.4

55

79

60

8.5

7579608.5

45796Q

9.

34579608.

70

57

96

08

.44

|57

96

07

. 2

69

79

61

4.

76

97

96

1 6

.74

979618.7

35

79

62

0.2

49

79

61

2.9

3979607.

1 1

97

96

1 2

.99

57

96

1 2

. 66

979592.4

6979597.5

35

79

59

8.

55

979601 .

19

57

96

02

.22

979603.3

6979602.6

6979601.

33

979599.9

71 9

79

59

9.5

5579598.5

6979597.5

59

79

59

9.3

1979597.

37

979597.2

35

79

59

5.6

05

79

59

6.3

39

79

59

6.4

0979597.

52

979597.2

8

Fre

e-a

iranom

aly

(m

Gal)

-22.5

3-2

7.1

9-2

9.

52-3

0.

72-3

2.2

5-3

3.2

8-3

4.3

8-4

0.8

3-4

2.1

5-4

4.0

8-3

8.

52

-38

.42

-39.

34

-40.

07

-44.3

3-4

2.

75

-41 .

49

-38

. 14

-36.

21-3

5.4

4-3

2.

76

-35.9

5-5

4.

76

-46.8

8-4

6.

85

-40.9

6-3

8.6

7-3

6.

16

-34.8

8-3

4.4

3-3

2.8

7-3

1 .

23

-30

.21

-28

. 7

0-2

8.

79

-29.3

0-3

1.5

6-2

8.9

3-3

2.2

5-3

2.6

9-3

4.8

2-3

4.

57

Te

rra

-

Ha

nd

0.0

30.0

10

.01

0.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

10

.01

0.0

10.0

10.0

1C

.01

0.0

1,

0.0

10.0

10

.03

0.1

00

.18

0.0

10.2

10.5

10.7

10

.01

0.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

10

.06

0.0

10

.05

0.0

60.0

10

.11

0.0

50.0

70

.01

0.0

10.1

10.0

30

.02

0.0

20

.02

Ln corr

ect

Com

p

1.1

61 .1

81

.21

1 .2

61 .2

71

.29

1.2

91.3

91

.46

1 .5

01

.38

1 .

35

1 .4

01

.41

2.0

52.0

72.0

92

.05

1 .8

5

,2.0

22

.02

2.1

82.2

61

.85

.78

.89

.69

.60

.51

1.4

51

.38

1.2

81

.28

1 .2

81.2

61.2

21.2

11

.18

1.1

91

.18

1.2

01

.22

ion

Bouguer

anom

aly

T

ota

l (m

Gal)

1.1

9

-190.2

71

.19

-1

93.8

01

.22

-1

94.6

71.2

7

-194.3

81

. 2

8

-195.

84

1.3

0

-196.3

61.3

0

-19

7.4

51.4

0

-202.0

01

.47

-2

02.5

61.5

1

-204.0

01

. 39

-199.8

61.3

6

-200.2

51.4

1

-200.4

31

.42

-2

01.

1 1

2.0

6

-202.2

32.1

0

-20

0.6

12

.19

-1

99

.26

2.2

3

-15

.7.0

61.8

6

-199.2

82.2

3

-200.5

32.5

3

-195.8

82.8

9

-19

7.9

92

.27

-2

13

.96

1.8

6

-20

7.2

71.7

9

-207.1

8.9

0

-20

1.7

5.7

0

-20

0.1

2.6

6

-198.0

5.5

2

-19

7.6

4.5

0

-197.8

6.4

4

-19

7.4

2.2

9

-196.9

9.3

9

-19

6.4

5.3

3

-19

5.7

5.3

3

-19

5.4

0.2

3

-19

6.7

61

.22

-1

98

.48

1.2

9

-19

7.2

91

.22

-1

99.4

51.2

0

-19

9.9

41

.22

-2

00.8

91

.24

-2

00

.58

Page 17: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Altitude

La

titu

de

Longitude

(fe

et

above

Sta

tion

(de

g

min

) (d

eg

m

in)

CU

SC

V2

03

3

8

58.9

3C

US

CV

204

33

59.3

0C

US

CV

20

5

38

5

5.9

5C

US

CV

206

33

5

5.9

5C

US

CV

20

7

38

55

.95

CU

SC

V2

08

38

55

.48

CU

SC

V209

38

5

5.0

8C

US

CV

210

38

5

4.6

3C

US

CV

211

38

5

4.6

5C

US

CV

212

38

54

.63

CU

SC

V2

13

3

8

54

.23

CU

SC

V2

14

38

53

.77

CU

SC

V2

15

38

54

.23

CU

SC

V216

38

5

4.2

5C

US

CV

21

7

38

5

4.2

7C

US

CV

21

8

38

53

.67

CU

SC

V2

19

3

8

53

.80

CU

SC

V220

38

53

.77

CU

SC

V221

38

54

.28

CU

SC

V222

38

53

.78

CU

SC

V223

38

5

3.7

8C

US

CV

224

38

5

3.3

5C

US

CV

225

38

52.8

8C

US

CV

22

6

38

52

.43

CU

SC

V2

27

3

8

52

.88

CU

SC

V223

38

52

.98

CU

SC

V2

2S

3

3 5

3.

08

CU

SC

V230

38

5?

. 95

CU

SC

V2

31

M

5

5.

55C

US

CV

232

38

53

.32

CU

SC

V233

|38

5

3.3

7C

US

CV

23

4

38

5

2.0

2C

US

CV

23

5

38

5

2.0

2C

US

CV

236

38

52.2

3C

US

CV

23

7

38

51

.55

CU

SC

V2

38

3

8

51 .

57

CU

SC

V239

38

51 .

20

CU

SC

V2

40

38

55

.87

CU

5C

V2

41

38

55

.43

CU

SC

V242

38

5

5.9

5C

US

CV

24

3

38

55.2

8C

US

CV

244

38

5

6.3

2C

US

CV

245

38

55.9

0

11

9

42.2

31

19

42.2

3119

44.5

21

19

4

4 .

92

11

9

43.9

21

19

43.5

51

19

43.0

71

19

43.3

81

19

43.9

01

19

4

4 .

47

119

44

.4

71

19

44.4

7119

45.1

21

19

43.8

51

19

43.3

71

19

43.3

71

19

43.8

7119

42.8

21

19

42.8

31

19

4

5.0

7119

45.8

21

19

44

.4

5119

44.4

5119

44.4

31

19

43.3

21

19

42.8

01

19

42.1

21

19

43.8

51

19

43.3

71

19

43.8

71

19

42.5

81

19

46.0

61

19

45.5

31

19

45.0

5119

45.2

31

19

46.6

21

19

46

.6

71

19

43.0

5119

42.8

71

19

42 .

42

1 19

42.4

51

19

41 .

43

11

9

40

.57

sea

leve

l)

4858.

04

85

5.0

47

65

.04

75

5.0

47

75

.04791 .

04

81

6.0

4852iO

48

42

.04

80

9.0

48

26

.04

84

5.0

47

97

.04

86

4.0

48

66

.04880.0

48

77

.04

89

3.0

48

37

.04

80

4.0

47

66

.04352.0

43

54

.04

86

8.0

49

18

.04

94

9.0

49

66

.04

89

0.0

43

95

.04882.0

4926.0

47

87

.04

79

0.0

48

25

.04844.0

4800.0

4822.0

48

17

.04

82

2.0

4856.0

4862.0

4936.0

49

86

.0

Ob

serv

ed

g

ravity

(mG

al)

97

95

99

.88

979603.4

5979601 .

96

979601 .

30

97

96

01

.6

49

79

59

9.7

19

79

59

7.4

6979596.5

5979597.7

99

79

60

0.

19

.97

95

98

.39

979597.6

59

79

59

7 .

09

97

95

97

. 3

6979596.2

99

79

59

5.

77

979597.1

39

79

59

4.9

79

79

59

8.2

4979596.2

99

79

59

3.

47

97

95

96

. 2

69

79

59

6.0

59

79

59

5.0

5979594.6

49

79

59

4.8

6970591 .

37

97

95

96

. 52

979595.3

5979596.

19

97

95

93

.36

979590.7

5979594.5

5979595.3

7979594.0

69

79

58

7.

10

97

95

85

.61

97

95

99

.00

57

95

98

.09

97

95

98

.02

579596.

35

979595.2

1979591 .

1 5

Te

rra

in corr

ection

Fre

e-a

ira

no

ma

ly

(mG

al )

H

and

-33.7

0

0.0

1-3

0.9

6

0.0

1-3

5.9

8

0.0

1-3

7.5

8

I 0

.04

-35.3

6

0.0

4-3

5.

1C

0.0

4-3

4.4

1

0.0

1-3

1.2

8

0.0

3-3

1.0

1

0.0

1-3

1.6

8

0.0

1-3

0.7

9

0.0

4-2

9.5

7

0.0

5-3

5.3

2

0.0

1-2

8.7

8

0.0

2-2

9.6

9

0.0

1-2

8.0

1

0.0

2-2

7.1

3

0.0

1-2

7.7

4

0.0

4-3

0.4

8

0.0

4-3

4.8

0

0.0

1-4

1.1

9

0.0

1-2

9.6

9

0.0

1-2

9.0

2

0.0

6-2

8.0

4

0.0

4-2

4.

41

I 0

.1 3

-21.4

2

0.1

6-2

2.

96

0.

18

-25

.27

I)

. 03

-26

.35

0.0

6-2

6.8

9

O.Q

5-2

5.1

6

, 0

.04

-39.3

5

0.0

1-3

5.2

7

0.0

1-3

1.4

7

0.0

1-2

9.9

9

0.0

1-4

1.1

2

Q.0

1-4

0.0

0

0.0

2-3

3.9

4

0.0

1-3

3.7

3

Q.0

1-3

1.3

7

Q.0

5-3

1.4

9

Q.0

7-2

7.2

0

Q.0

6-2

5.9

5

0.2

6

Com

p T

ota

l

1.1

9

1.2

0.1

9

1.2

0.6

5

1.6

6.7

4

1.7

8.5

6

1.6

0.5

6

1.6

0.5

4

1.5

5.5

7

1.6

01

.64

1.6

51

.76

1

.77

1.8

0

1.8

41.8

6

1.9

12.0

0

2.0

11

.67

1.6

91 .6

0

1 .6

11.6

7

1.6

91

.72

1

.73

1 .6

0

1 .6

41

.59

1

.63

2.0

7

2.0

82.3

9

2.4

01

.94

1

.95

2.0

2

2.0

82.0

9

2.1

31

.74

1

.87

1 .

64

1 .8

01

.59

1 .7

71

. 33

1 .8

61

. 70

1 .7

61

. 7

8

j 1

.83

1 .6

1

1 .6

53

.12

3

.13

2.7

7

2.7

82

.42

2.4

32.6

4

2.6

53.8

5

3.8

64.0

7

4.0

91

.45

1

.46

1 .4

8

1 .4

91

. 36

1 .4

11

.43

1

.50

1.2

2

1.2

81.

26

1.5

2

Bo

ug

ue

r anom

aly

(m

Ga

l)

-199.5

8-1

96

.74

-198.

23

-199.3

6-1

98.0

0-1

98.2

9-1

98

.51

-196.5

5-1

95

.89

-19

5.3

1-1

94

.94

-194.3

0-1

98

.31

-194.3

8-1

95.4

4-1

94.1

6-1

93.

14

-19

4.3

9-1

95.2

1-1

97.9

5-2

02.7

2-1

94.6

1-1

93.8

8-1

93

.33

-19

1.6

8-1

89.8

2-1

91 .

97

-19

1 .

58

-19

3.4

4-1

92.9

7-1

92

.93

-200.8

7-1

97

.24

-194.9

9-1

93

-94

-202.3

6-2

01

.75

-198.1

6-1

98

.09

-196.9

7-1

97

.21

-195.6

8-1

95.8

9

Page 18: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

La

titu

de

Longitude

Sta

tio

n

(deg

min

) (d

eg

m

in)

CU

SC

V246

CU

SC

V2

47

CU

SC

V248

CU

SC

V249

CU

SC

V2

50

CU

SC

V2

51

CU

SC

V252

CU

SC

V2

53

CU

SC

V254

CU

SC

V2

55

CU

SC

V2

S6

CU

SC

V257

CU

SC

V2S

8C

US

CV

259

CU

SC

V2

60

CU

SC

V261

CU

SC

V262

CU

SC

V263

CU

SC

V264

CU

SC

V265

CU

SC

V266

CU

SC

V267

CU

SC

V268

CU

SC

V269

CU

SC

V270

CU

SC

V2

71

CU

SC

V2

72

CU

SC

V2

73

CU

SC

V2

74

CU

SC

V2

75

CU

SC

V2

76

CU

SC

V2

77

CU

SC

V278

CU

SC

V2

79

CU

SC

V2

80

CU

SC

V281

CU

SC

V282

CU

SC

V2

83

CU

SC

V284

CU

SC

V2

85

CU

SC

V2

86

CU

SC

V2

87

CU

SC

V2

88

38

5

5.5

83

8

55

.88

38

55.9

038

55

.27

38

54.8

338

5

4.8

538

54.6

738

54.4

538

54.3

538

54.3

838

53.9

038

5

3.5

538

5

3.1

038

53.1

238

53.5

538

5

8.5

738

58.5

538

5

8.1

238

5

8.1

23

8

58

.12

38

58

.13

38

5

7.6

838

5

6.8

233

5

7.1

238

57.6

838

5

7.6

838

5

7.4

833

56

.82

38

57.2

738

57.6

833

58

.07

33

57

.97

33

5

8.5

738

58.5

738

5

8.5

738

5

7.4

533

5

9.4

333

59.4

338

5

9.9

733

5

8.5

733

5

8.5

738

5

8.9

833

5

9.4

3

1 19

41

.0

2119

41 .

50

1 19

41

.9

51

19

41

.6

71

19

41

.4

8119

40

.67

1 19

41

.0

81

19

40.5

81

19

41 .

1 7

1 19

41

.6

71

19

40.7

81

19

40.7

81

19

4

0.7

811941 .

42

1 19

41

.4

0119

46

.18

11

9

45.5

81

19

45.5

81

19

46.1

8119

45

.05

1 19

4

4.5

01

19

44 .

50

11

94

4 .

48

11

9

44

.87

11

94

5 .

05

119

45

.57

119

43.9

31

19

43.6

3119

43.3

51

19

43.3

71

19

42

.83

119

43.9

21

19

43.9

21

19

43.3

71

19

4

2.8

71

19

42

.68

1 1

9

43.1

31

19

43

.68

1 19

4

3.8

51

19

44

.4

71

19

45.0

311945 .

03

119

45

.03

Altitude

(feet

above

O

bse

rved

sea

gra

vity

leve

l)

(mG

al)

4958.0

979591.5

64

94

0.0

9

79

59

2.9

34912.0

979594.1

74

89

8.0

979593.6

24945.0

979589.5

75

03

8.0

979585.6

04

98

0.0

9

79

58

8.8

85

05

9.0

979584.4

15

00

3.0

9

79

58

7.2

14

94

5.0

9

79

58

9.0

64

97

3.0

9

79

58

9.6

64

98

1.0

979589.4

64

98

3.0

979591.1

34949.0

979593.5

44936.0

9

79

59

2.5

34

70

3.0

979597.5

84713.0

9

79

60

0.7

44716.0

979600.6

44

70

6.0

9

79

59

7.2

54726.0

9

79

60

3.5

74746.0

979604.9

74

74

5.0

979605.1

44

74

9.0

979605.0

94

73

7.0

979604.4

64

72

8.

a

979603.3

54717.0

979600.7

44

76

6.0

,9

79

60

5.9

24

78

0.0

979603.6

44

79

0.0

979604.0

24803.0

979602.6

84832.0

9

79

59

9.0

34779.0

979604.3

24

76

7.0

9

79

60

4.6

04

79

4.0

979602.2

74

82

4.0

9

79

60

0.0

94849.0

979601.8

64789.0

9

79

60

7.8

24754.0

9

79

60

7.4

74

75

6.0

979608.6

44741 .

0

979606.6

14725.0

979604.2

04719.0

979605.3

74

71

1.0

9

79

60

6.4

0

Fre

e-a

ir

anom

aly

(m

Ga

l)

-27

.70

-28.4

6-2

9.8

8-3

0.8

2-2

9.8

1-2

5.0

7-2

6.9

7-2

3.7

0-2

6.0

1-2

9.6

6-2

5.7

2-2

4.6

5-2

2.1

4-2

2.9

5-2

5.8

1-5

0.0

4-4

5.9

1-4

5.1

0-4

9.4

3-4

1.2

3-3

7.9

6-3

7.2

3-3

5.6

4-3

7.8

4-4

0.6

2-4

4.2

6-3

4.1

8-3

4.1

7-3

3.5

1-3

4.2

4-3

5.7

3-3

5.2

8-3

7.0

1-3

6.8

0-3

6.1

6

,-3

0.3

9-3

2.9

8

'-3

6.6

2-3

6.0

6-3

7.

44-4

1.

36-4

1.4

5-4

1 .

74

Terr

ain

corr

ection

Bouguer

Hand

0.0

80.2

50

.01

0.0

10.0

70.0

90.0

50

.04

0.0

50

.06

0.1

60

.04

0.1

90

.05

0.0

20.0

10.0

10

.01

0.0

10.0

10

.06

0.0

30.0

20

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.02

0.0

10

.03

0.0

10

.01

0.0

20

.10

0.0

10.0

10

.01

0.0

30.0

10.0

10

.01

an

om

aly

C

omp

To

tal

(mG

al)

1.3

0

.38

I1.2

8

.53

1.3

0

.31

1.3

8

.39

1.3

7

.44

1.3

2

.41

1 .3

7

11 .

42

1.3

5

1.3

91.

39

1 .4

41

.44

1

.50

1.5

2

1.6

81

.57

1.6

11

.65

1

.84

1.6

4

1.6

91.5

9

1.6

11

.79

1

.80

1.6

3

1.6

41

.67

1.6

81

.82

1.8

31

.56

1

.57

1.4

6

1.5

21

.50

1.5

31

.56

1.5

81

.60

1 .6

11

.60

1

.61

1.7

0

1.7

11

.43

1

.44

1.4

4

1.4

51.3

6

1.3

71

.32

1

.34

1.2

6

1.2

71

.37

1.4

01

. 36

1 .3

71

.29

1.3

01.2

5

1.2

71.2

6

1.3

61

.27

1.2

81

.33

1.3

41

.32

! 1

.33

1.4

3

1 .4

61

.52

1

.53

1.

50

1.5

11

.49

1

.50

-19

6.8

3-1

96.8

2-1

97

.50

-19

7.8

9-1

98

.43

-19

6.9

0-1

96

.81

-196.2

7-1

96

.62

-198.2

2-1

95

.06

-194.3

3-1

91

.66

-19

1.4

6-1

93.9

6-2

10.0

2-2

06

.39

-20

5.6

4-2

09.4

8-2

02

.22

-19

9.6

9-1

98.9

2-1

97

.41

-199.1

6-2

01

.64

-20

4.8

0-1

96

.68

-197.1

4-1

96.9

0-1

98.0

9-2

00.6

6-1

98.2

5-1

99

.61

-200.3

9-2

00

.81

-19

5.8

0-1

96

.43

-19

8.8

1-1

98.3

2-1

99

.06

-20

2.3

5-2

02.2

6-2

02.2

8

Page 19: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Sta

tion

CU

SC

V2S

9C

US

CV

29

CC

US

CV

29 1

-CU

SC

V2

92

CU

SC

V2

93

CU

SC

V294

CU

SC

V2

95

CU

SC

V296

CU

SC

V2

97

CU

SC

V2

98

CU

SC

V299

CU

SC

V300

CU

SC

V3

01

CU

SC

V3

C2

CU

SC

V3

03

CU

SC

V304

CU

SC

V3

05

CU

SC

V3

06

CU

SC

V307

CU

SC

V3

08

CU

SC

V3

09

CU

SC

V310

CU

SC

V31

1C

US

CV

31

2C

US

CV

31 3

CU

SC

V31

4C

US

CV

31 5

CU

SC

V31

7C

US

CV

318

CU

SC

V31

9C

US

CV

320

CU

SC

V321

CU

SC

V322

CU

SC

V3

23

CU

SC

V3

24

CU

SC

V3

25

CU

SC

V326

CU

SC

V327

CU

SC

V328

CU

SC

V329

CU

SC

V33

CC

US

CV

331

CU

SC

V332

CU

SC

V3

33

La

titu

de

(deg

min

)

38

59

.02

37

3.7

835

4

.2?

\ 39

4

.65

' 3

9

5.0

33

9

3.9

239

4.3

73

9

5.1

039

3.7

539

4.2

339

4.5

039

5.0

339

5.7

53

9

6.2

03

9

6.1

539

6.2

73

8

52

.80

38

52

.63

38

53.8

538

53

.75

38

54

.30

38

54.7

038

54

.85

39

0.9

73

9

0.2

33

9

2.0

83

9

2.4

63

9

1.8

13

9

1.5

339

1.1

539

1.3

63

9

0.7

139

0.8

53

9

0.7

139

5.6

03

9

3.5

83

9

3.4

33

9

3.1

339

2.9

538

58

.98

38

58.9

638

58

.63

38

59.1

038

59.4

6

Longitude

(deg

min

)

119

45.5

71

19

45

.5

21

19

45

.4

31

19

45

.33

11

9

45.2

51

19

4

4.7

01

19

4

4.6

71

19

44

.4

8119

45

.98

11

9

45.8

31

19

4

6.2

8119

46.0

21

19

4

5.5

51

19

45 .

62

1 19

4

4.8

51

19

43

.97

1 19

41

.8

51

19

41

.0

81

19

41 .

37

1 19

42.0

1119

42

.30

119

42.6

21

19

42.1

01

19

47

.93

11

9

48.1

31

19

48

.88

1 19

48.3

1119

48

.35

1 19

4

8.9

0119

48.9

11

19

4

7.7

8119

48

.91

11

9

49

.63

1 19

47.2

11

19

44.4

61

19

47

.56

1 19

4

8.1

619

4

7.6

819

4

7.9

819

47.2

119

4

7.6

819

48.3

119

48.6

619

4

9.3

5

Altitu

de

(f

ee

t above

se

a

leve

l)

47

10

.04

64

9.0

46

46

.04

64

1 .

04

63

9.0

46

53

.04644.0

46

36

.04

65

0.0

4646.0

4654.0

4656.0

46

70

.04

71

9.0

46

57

.04807.0

4906.0

50

26

.04954.0

48

71

.04845.0

4840.0

4870.0

4665.0

4668.0

46

60

.04

65

8.0

46

60

.04

86

3.0

46

63

.04

66

1.0

4666.0

4666.0

4672.0

4632.0

46

79

.04

70

8.0

4667.0

46

54

.04686.0

4677.0

4681,0

46

76

.04

66

8.0

Obse

rved

Fre

e-a

ir

gra

vity

anom

aly

(m

Gal)

(mG

al)

579601 .

27

57

06

1 7

.95

97

96

1 8

.91

1979619.0

9

I9

79

61

9.7

1

!579620.9

5

1979622.4

0979623.3

197961 7

. 58

97961 8

.64

579620.4

3579620.5

3979620.

399

79

61

9.2

99

79

62

2.0

057961 6

.03

979597.5

3979590.2

6979590.

1 7

979595.6

69

79

59

6.8

9579598.0

39

79

59

4.3

69

79

60

8.5

89

79

60

4.

3797961 4

.48

57

96

1 5

.65

579612.2

19

79

61

3.4

69

79

61

2.9

1979609.

78979610.9

497961 5

.1 7

979604.4

8979623.6

99

79

61

9.7

59

79

61

7.9

257961 8

.38

97

96

1 6

.60

979595.5

49

79

59

6.4

79

79

59

4.4

6979597.2

65

79

60

2.5

1

-46

.36

-42.4

1-4

2.

38-4

3.3

0-4

3.4

3-3

9.2

4-3

9.

30-4

0.2

2-4

2.

64-4

2.6

7-4

0.

52-4

1 .

01

-40.9

0-3

8.0

5-4

1.1

0-3

3.1

4-2

2.5

3-1

8.2

7-2

6.9

2-2

9.0

9-3

1.1

1-3

1 .

03

-32

. 10

-46.

1 4

-48

.98

-42.3

5-4

1 .

92

-44.2

2-2

3.4

8-4

2.2

7-4

5.8

9-4

3.3

1-3

9.2

8-4

9.2

0-4

0.9

5-3

7.

50-3

6.3

8-3

9.

33-4

2.0

7-5

4.

28-5

4.

17-5

5.3

2-5

3.6

8-4

9.7

1

Te

rra

in corr

ection

Han

d

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10.4

60

.42

0.2

60

.01

0.0

10

.05

0.1

30.5

30

.47

0.0

41.7

80.2

60

.36

0.0

30

.02

0.0

30.1

00

.04

0.0

10

.01

0.0

90.0

30

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

40.0

20.3

30

.37

0.2

20.0

90

.01

0.0

10.0

50

.01

0.0

20.2

5

Com

p

1 .6

01

.76

1 .

77I

1 .7

91

.78

' 1

.66

1 .7

41

.70

1.8

41

.85

1.9

71

.93

1.8

11

.78

1.7

31

.41

1.7

41 .6

41

.52

1.6

21

.57

1.5

31

.47

2.6

42

.72

4.0

53

.26

3.2

03

.36

3.7

92

.55

3.6

55

.07

2.1

61

.74

2.5

12

.98

2.6

22

.92

2.1

42

.42

2.8

93

.22

4.1

9

Tota

l

1 .6

11

. 77

1 .

781

.80

I 1.7

92.1

22.1

61 .9

61

.85

1 .8

62

.02

2.0

62

.34

2.2

51

.77

3.1

92.0

02.0

01

.55

1 .6

41

.60

1 .6

31

.51

2.6

52.7

34

.14

3.2

93.2

13.3

73.8

02.5

63.6

65

.11

2.1

82.0

72.8

83.2

02

.71

2.9

32.1

52.4

72.9

03.2

44

.44

Bo

ug

ue

r a

no

ma

ly

(mG

al)

-206.

76-2

00

.57

-20

0.4

2-2

01 .

16

-20

1.2

2-1

97.

19-1

96.8

9-1

97.7

3-2

00.7

5-2

00.6

3-1

98

.60

-19

9.

12-1

99.2

0-1

98

.1 3

-199.5

3-1

95

.29

-18

9.2

6-1

89

.10

-195.7

5-1

94.9

8-1

96.1

5-1

95

.87

-198.0

9-2

03.9

7-2

06.8

3-1

98.5

1-1

98

.87

-201.3

1-1

87.3

6-1

98.8

7-2

03

.67

-200.1

5-1

94.6

8-2

07.7

4-1

98

.22

-19

5.5

7-1

95.1

3-1

97

.1 7

-19

9.2

4-2

1 3

.33

-21

2.5

9-2

13

.44

-21

1.2

9-2

05

.85

Page 20: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Altitu

de

L

atitu

de

Longitude

(feet

above

O

bse

rve

d

Sta

tion

(deg

min

) (d

eg

min

)

CU

SC

V3

34

CU

SC

V3

35

CU

SC

V336

CU

SC

V3

37

CU

SC

V3

38

CU

SC

V339

CU

SC

V3

40

CU

SC

V34

1C

US

CV

34

2C

US

CV

343

CU

SC

V344

CU

SC

V345

CU

SC

V3

46

CU

SC

V3

47

CU

SC

V348

CU

SC

VH

9C

US

CV

550

CU

SC

V35

1C

US

CV

552

CU

SC

V3

53

CU

SC

V5

54

CU

SC

V355

CU

SC

V3

56

CU

SC

V357

CU

SC

V3

58

CU

SC

V354

CU

SC

V56

QC

US

CV

36

1C

US

CV

363

CU

SC

V365

CU

SC

V366

,C

US

CV

367

CU

SC

V368

CU

SC

V369

CU

SC

V3

70

CU

SC

V371

CU

SC

V372

CU

SC

V3

73

CU

SC

V374

CU

SC

V375

CU

SC

V376

CU

SC

V377

CU

SC

V378

33

58

.60

38

57.3

83

8

57.8

038

5

7.3

638

57.3

638

56.9

038

5

6.6

038

56.5

03

8

56.9

338

55.6

338

54

.96

33

55.2

633

5

7.1

638

56

.36

38

56

.80

38

56.3

538

5

5.

3(S

38

54.9

0?S

54

. ?

038

55.2

133

5

5.0

638

5

3.6

833

5

4.1

833

53.3

033

51

.18

38

50.2

038

48

.81

39

2.7

33

9

2.5

139

3.6

53

9

2.3

039

1.6

33

9

2.4

63

9

1.2

139

1.5

53

9

1.8

639

0.5

63

9

1.1

33

9

1.0

83

9

0.3

83

9

0.4

139

0.1

03

9

1.0

0

119

49.3

01

19

49.0

11

19

49

.75

11

9

47

.86

1 19

4

8.4

81

19

47

.28

11

9

48

.13

119

45

.96

1 19

4

6.0

81

19

44.2

31

19

4

3.6

11

19

44.2

81

19

49.5

51

19

49.6

81

19

49.5

31

19

48

.90

119

48.1

11

19

4

8.0

11

19

50.5

11

19

47

.20

119

45.3

01

19

47

.20

1 19

47.4

11

19

48.3

01

19

47.4

01

19

4

7.5

81

19

46

.75

11

9

42.4

11

19

41 .

65

119

39

.28

119

40

.05

119

39.0

81

19

3

7.5

01

19

41 .

13

11

9

40

.25

1 19

41

.0

61

19

41 .

06

11

9

40

.08

11

9

37

.80

119

38.3

81

19

39.2

51

19

39.9

1119

38.8

5

sea

gra

vity

leve

l)

(mG

al)

46

74

. (j

97

95

97

.35

4683.0

'9

79

59

3.6

84

67

0.0

9

79

59

6.6

74686.0

9

79

59

1.5

04685.0

9

79

59

2.2

94

69

9.0

9

79

59

2.0

14693.0

^9

79592.

284

72

1.0

9

79

59

7.1

94

72

2.0

9

79

59

6.7

74778.0

979600.9

24

80

4.0

979599.3

64783.0

9

79

60

1 .

43

4682.0

9

79

59

5.8

04685.0

9

79

59

6.3

84

68

1.0

9

79

59

5.9

74

69

2.0

979594.6

64

70

6.0

9

79

59

2.6

54708.0

979591 .

14

4-74

Q.O

9

79

57

5.3

34

71

3.0

979591.5

54752.0

979599.

744

72

6.0

979586.9

54717.0

9

79

58

8.3

44724.0

979586.2

54

86

5.0

9

79

58

1.3

15

03

9.0

979570.5

35070.0

1979565.8

34

93

8.0

9

79

61

3.1

95102.0

9

79

60

7.2

15918.0

I 979558.

705296.0

979584.5

95275.0

9

79

57

6.2

35726.0

979556.3

75063.0

979606.0

15

61

1.0

979567.4

55213.0

979600.8

65064.0

9

79

60

1.0

45

19

1.0

9

79

59

3.0

05

40

2.0

9

79

56

4.1

55

40

3.0

979556.8

35198.0

9

79

57

8.5

65

09

6.0

9

79

58

6.7

75394.0

9

79

56

3.3

3

Fre

e-a

ir

anom

aly

(m

Gal)

-53

.04

-54.0

7-5

2.9

2-5

5.

9A-5

5.2

5-5

3.

53-5

3.

39-4

5.

70-4

6.6

6-3

5.3

3-3

3.4

6-3

3.

31-5

1.

72-4

9.6

9-5

1 .

12

-50

. 73

-49

. 9

7-5

0.

62-

4 5

. 9

F-5

0.1

9-3

8.

12-5

1 .

32

-51 .

52

-51

. 6

5-4

0.2

3-3

3.2

1-3

2.9

6-1

8.4

6-8

.70

1 7

.80

-12

.78

!

-22.1

3-0

.82

-1 1

.6

60.7

9-3

.66

-15

.58

-12.5

2-2

1 .

46

-27.6

6-2

5.2

4-2

6.1

6-2

2.9

2

Te

rra

in corr

ection

Ha

nd

0.2

10.0

40

.41

0.0

90.0

50.0

30.0

40.0

40

.01

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10

.1 4

0.

190.2

60

.01

0.0

10

.01

2.

7<*

0.0

10

.01

0.0

10.0

10

.02

0.2

12

.04

0.4

90

.33

0.3

31

.08

0.0

90.0

60.6

80

.12

2.5

40.5

10.1

40.3

40

.11

0.6

10

.11

0.0

10.5

0

Com

p T

ota

l

4.0

83.7

74

.95

2.6

93

.17

2.4

23

.04

1.9

21 .9

01

.63

1 .6

11

.68

4.7

25

.29

4.8

13

.93

3.4

73

.62

8.

512

.78

1 .9

43

.44

3.4

15

.48

5.2

45

.62

4.2

61

.23

1.1

3I

1.5

0i

1.1

31

.18

1.

311

.10

1.3

01.0

71

.08

1 .0

81

.26

1 .1

21

.12

1.1

11.1

1

4.2

93.8

15.3

62.7

83

.22

2.4

53.0

81.9

61

.91

1 .6

41

.62

1 .6

94.8

65.4

85

.07

3.9

43

.48

3.6

31

1 .0

52.7

91

.95

3.4

53

.42

5.5

05

.45

7.6

64.7

51 .5

61

.46

2.5

81

.22

1.2

41

.99

1 .2

23

.84

1.5

81

.22

1 .4

21

.37

1 .7

31.2

31

.12

1 .6

1

Bo

ug

ue

r anom

aly

(m

Ga

l)

-209.5

4-2

11

.35

-20

8.2

0-2

14.3

5-2

1 3

.18

-21

2.7

2-2

11

.74

-20

6.1

3-2

07.1

8-1

98

.04

-19

7.0

7-1

96.6

4-2

07

.92

-205.3

7-2

07

.08

-20

8.1

9-2

08

. 37

-20

8.9

4-2

04.8

2-2

09

.52

-19

9.6

2-2

10

.44

-21

0.3

5-2

08.6

5-2

02.1

0-1

98

.83

-202.5

5-1

86.7

3-1

82

.68

-182.9

5-1

93.6

4-2

02.2

4-1

95

.60

-18

4.5

4-1

88

.22

-181.3

1-1

88

.49

-18

9.5

7-2

05.7

9-2

11.6

6-2

02.7

4-2

00.2

7-2

06

.73

Page 21: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Altitu

de

L

atitu

de

Longitu

de

(feet

above

Sta

tio

n

(deg

min

) (d

eg

min

)

CU

SC

V3

79

CU

SC

V380

CU

SC

V381

CU

SC

V382

CU

SC

V383

CU

SC

V3

84

CU

SC

V3

85

CU

SC

V386

CU

SC

V387

CU

SC

V388

CU

SC

V389

CU

SC

V3

90

CU

SC

V3

91

CU

SC

V3

92

CU

SC

V393

CU

SC

V3

94

CU

SC

V3

95

CU

SC

V396

CU

SC

V397

CU

SC

V3

98

CU

SC

V399

CU

SC

V400

CU

SC

V401

CU

SC

V4Q

2C

US

CV

4C

3C

US

CV

404

CU

SC

V4

05

CU

SC

V406

CU

SC

V4

C7

CU

SC

V4

08

CU

SC

V409

CU

SC

V4

1Q

CU

SC

V4

1 1

CU

SC

V41

?'

CU

SC

V4

1 3

CU

SC

V4

14

CU

SC

V41 5

CU

SC

V4

1 6

CU

SC

V4

1 7

CU

SC

V4

18

CU

SC

V4

1 9

CU

SC

V420

38

59.8

63

8

59.8

53

8

59.3

538

59.3

63

8

59

.81

38

5

9.5

53

8

59.8

33

8

58.8

33

8

58.2

63

8

57

.75

38

5

7.2

53

8

56.8

838

56.8

838

56

. 18

38

56.3

83

8

58.8

83

3

59

.35

33

58.5

63

8

56.2

038

57

. 15

33

57.2

33

8

57.7

13

3

58

.93

38

5d.4

53

8

57

.83

33

58

. 15

33

5

7.4

53

3

56

.36

33

5

5.9

63

3

55

.96

3?

55

.95

56'.

6S?i

55

.08

M

55 .

1 1

38

55

. 16

38

55.5

138

54.2

53

3

54 .

30

33

54.2

633

55.4

53

3

53.7

63

8

51 .5

8

11

9

41.6

3119

40.5

61

19

40.0

31

19

39.2

31

19

39.2

51

19

3

8.0

1119

34.2

8119

37

.70

119

37.7

31

19

37.6

11

19

38.3

31

19

38.3

31

19

3

7.7

61

19

3

7.8

0119

38

.35

11

94

1 .

03

1 19

41 .

23

1 19

40.5

51

19

40.7

61

19

39.8

11

19

3

8.9

0119

38.9

01

19

3

9.0

6119

39

.76

1 19

39

.55

11

9

39

.05

1 1

9

40.8

11

19

40.5

11

19

40.0

01

19

3

9.1

51

19

3

P .

4 3

1 19

39

.25

119

59.5

1119

5 «

. 3

6119

38.0

01

19

39.7

61

19

39.4

81

19

38.7

81

19

38.3

11

19

36.1

31

19

39.5

61

19

46.0

6

sea

level)

49

16

.05

06

1.0

51 6

6.0

50

67

.051

07

.05

28

2.0

63

04

.05

20

5.0

53

88

.05

40

9.0

51 7

7.0

51 7

3. b

5226.0

52

22

.0,

51 5

2.0

4930.0

49

23

.04962.0

49

50

.05

06

2.0

51

66

.051

33.0

50

93

.05280.0

53

22

.05

23

0.0

50

63

.051

46

.0S

03

9.0

5097.0

5 1

5 3

. -1

SI

47

. :>

S?88.0

S2

74

.C5

26

0.0

53

22

.05

21

8.0

5254.0

53

41

.05862.0

54

44

.04

80

6.0

Obse

rved

gra

vity

(mG

al)

579605.7

95

79

59

1.6

55

79

58

0.5

09

79

58

6.2

8579583.0

9979567.

22

579527.0

39

79

57

5.3

45

79

56

7.6

69

79

56

9.9

1979584.6

0579583.7

0579581 .

23

57

95

82

.03

57

95

83

.66

979597.9

85

79

60

1 .

49

57

95

95

.42

57

95

95

.12

57

95

89

.44

579583.3

0979586.

27

57

95

86

.27

57

95

73

.23

57

95

71

.6

85

79

57

9.

23

579588.9

2579582.

45

579589.6

75

79

58

7.

32

57

95

82

. 94

ci>

058<

.. 2

15

70

56

3.

46

c?<

357<

. .

77I 9

79

57

9.

719

79

57

0.

31979577.

42

579579.1

85

79

57

3.3

85

79

55

0.3

19

79

56

3.0

8979589.4

6

Fre

e-a

ir

anom

aly

(m

Gal)

-23

.71

-24

.21

-24.

75

-23.2

9-2

8.3

8-2

7.4

228.0

3-2

5.4

8-1

5.1

2-1

0.1

5-1

6.

53

-17.2

6-1

4.7

5-1

3.3

0-1

8.

54-2

8.7

6-2

6.

60

-27

.84

-28

. 74

-22.

35

-18

.83

-19

.67

-25

.22

-19

.98

-16

.67

-18

.24

-23

. 2

2-2

0.2

9-2

2.5

3-1

9.4

3-1

6.0

6'-1

3.9

0

-24

.05

-1

4. H

! -1

0.5

5-1

4.6

3-1

5.4

5-1

0.

38

-7.9

41

6.

71-7

.83

-38

.21

Te

rra

in

co

rre

ctio

n

Ha

nd

C

omp

Tota

l

0.0

30

.06

0.3

20

.05

0.0

70.0

72.3

20.2

30.3

10

.98

0.0

20

.03

0.2

20

.08

0.1

40

.02

0.2

70.3

20

.03

0.6

10.0

40

.04

0.0

61

.20

0.9

60

.36

0.7

40

.31

0.4

30.2

9i

0.1

10

.31

0.4

80.8

20

.05

0.4

50.1

50.1

30.0

72

.57

1.3

90

.02

1.1

61

.08

1 .0

51.1

81.1

51.1

61

.76

1.2

51

.12

1.1

41

.19

1.2

11.2

41.3

01

.27

1.1

61.1

61

.15

1 .1

61

.15

1.1

41.1

41

.16

1 .0

61

.07

1 .0

81.1

11.1

41

.24

1 .2

61

.29

1.1

61.2

11

.25

1 .3

51.1

91.3

31

.38

1 .3

81

.49

1.3

33

.26

1 .1

91.U

1.3

71

.23

1.2

21.2

34.0

81 .4

81.4

32.1

21.2

11

.24

.46

.38

.41

.18

.43

.47

.19

. 7

6.1

81.1

81

.22

2.2

62

.03

1 .4

41 .8

51

.45

1 .7

21

.55

1.4

01.4

71

.69

2.0

71 .4

01 .6

41

.48

1 .5

11

.45

4.0

62.7

23

.28

Bo

ug

ue

r anom

aly

(m

Gal)

-191.5

9-1

97

.10

-201.0

1-2

01.3

0-2

02.7

6-2

07.7

8-1

84.4

1-2

02.9

6-1

98.9

1-1

93.9

7-1

93.3

2-1

93.8

8-1

92.9

6-1

91.4

6-1

94.2

8-1

97.1

3-1

94.4

8-1

97

.02

-197.

79

-194.6

5-1

95.2

8-1

94.9

8-1

99

.13

-19

9.2

5-1

97.6

0-1

96.6

2-1

95.4

7-1

95.7

8. -1

94.0

9-1

93.

15

i -1

94.0

1-1

94

.41

-204.1

5-1

93

.35

-18

9.9

9-1

95.9

6-1

93

.37

-18

9.5

0-1

90.1

0-1

80.6

5-1

92

.24

-20

0.2

4

Page 22: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

I * > a

L

Sta

tion

(d

CU

SC

V421

CU

SC

V4

22

CU

SC

V4

23

CU

SC

V4

24

|

CU

SC

V4

25

CU

SC

V4

26

CU

SC

V4

27

CU

SC

V4

23

CU

SC

V4

29

CU

SC

V4

30

CU

SC

V431

CU

SC

V4

32

CU

SC

V4

33

CU

SC

V434

CU

SC

V4

35

CU

SC

V4

36

CU

SC

V437

CU

SC

V4

3S

CU

SC

V439

CU

SC

V44Q

CU

SC

V441

CU

SC

V4

42

CU

SC

V4

43

CU

SC

V444

CU

SC

V445

CU

SC

V446

CU

SC

V447

CU

SC

V448

CU

SC

V4

49

CU

SC

V450

CU

SC

V451

CU

SC

V452

CU

SC

V453

CU

SC

V454

CU

SC

V455

CU

SC

V456

CU

SC

V457

CU

SC

V458

CU

SC

V4

59

CU

SC

V4

60

atitu

de

eg

min

)

38

51 .

13

38

5

0.7

138

50

.35

38

49

.70

38

4

9.1

83

3

48.5

53

3

48.6

33

8

49.6

538

5

2.6

638

52.2

538

51

.13

33

50.7

33

8

49

.80

38

49.0

63

8

48

.93

39

5

.06

39

5.0

63

9

4.4

039

4.4

339

4.5

039

4

.55

39

4

.65

39

4.7

038

49.7

638

50

.07

38

50.7

038

5

0.1

33

8

48

.35

38

52.6

138

53.1

239

3.9

538

51

.00

39

1.9

03

8

51 .

45

38

48.9

838

51.4

738

55.3

738

5

8.6

03

9

2.5

838

59

.77

Longitude

(deg

min

)

' 1

19

46.0

81

19

46.0

61

19

46.0

81

19

4

6.1

31

19

4

6.6

51

19

46

.66

11

9

47.4

81

19

47.1

11

19

42

.91

11

94

4 .

55

1 19

45.2

5119

45.1

51

19

45.1

31

19

45

.21

1 19

4

5.5

5119

49.9

5119

50

.60

1 19

51

.1

6119

50.4

51

19

5

0.2

319

5

0.0

319

49.6

619

4

9.4

619

4

6.6

619

4

6.6

519

4

6.6

31

19

44.5

1119

45

.87

11

9

45.4

811944 .

93

119

43.2

71

19

3

7.1

519

3

4.5

819

54

.05

19

50.5

319

51

.7

719

39.8

119

53.5

519

5

2.8

2119

53

.30

Altitu

de

(f

eet

above

sea

leve

l)

1 4

82

7.0

48

62

.04894.0

4943.0

5005.0

5105.0

5366.0

50

72

.05

37

3.0

5055.0

4874.0

48

81

.0

4992.0

5072.0

50

82

.05069.0

5195.0

5917.0

5170.0

5096.0

5147.0

50

04

.04

99

5.0

4945.0

4934.0

4865.0

5290.0

55

91

.04813.0

4834.0

59

5Q

.O6

95

0.0

7039.0

1 0

88

1 ,

t)9

36

7.0

'1

06

33

.01

00

67

.07334.0

91 5

0.0

8384.0

Ob

serv

ed

gra

vity

(mG

al)

1 9

79

58

8.2

89

79

58

7 .

70

979587.1

6579579.9

29

79

57

1 .

27

97

95

63

.25

979545.9

79

79

56

7.7

4979567.9

1979583.0

59

79

59

3.4

8579592.7

99

79

58

4.6

49

79

57

4.1

3979570.6

69

79

59

0.8

8979583.2

29

79

53

9.6

8979584.4

5979588.8

59

79

59

2.0

19

79

59

4.8

9979593.5

4979576.9

59

79

58

1 .

49

979584.8

7979568.8

8979531 .

98

979594.

21979596.1

3979544.6

59

79

47

2.3

1979484.9

257

91 9

1 .8

9979290.2

2979195.5

0979247.

16979455.

289

79

33

5.8

3979386.9

5

Fre

e-a

iranom

aly

(m

Gal)

-36.

75

-33.4

5-3

0.

43

-32

. 1

1-3

4.1

7-3

1 .

37

-24

. 7

3-3

2.0

9-8

.05

-22

. 20

-27.

14

-26

. 5

8-2

2.9

3-2

4 .

34

-27.

18

-31

.

89

-27

. 7

0-2

.4?

-27

.90

-30

. 56

-22.6

8-3

3.

38

-35.6

5-3

4.9

8-3

1 .

93

-35.9

6-1

1.1

7-1

7.1

6-3

4.3

1-3

1.1

26.3

246.9

951

.94

135.1

994.9

51

15

.48

108.

25

54

. 8

7100.

18

83

.48

Terr

a]

Han

d

0.0

20.0

20

.01

0.0

10

.24

0.2

80.7

90.6

62

.43

1 .3

20

.12

0.2

30.0

80.1

00.0

80.4

82

.15

9.1

71

.07

0.7

20.5

60.1

90.1

70.1

60.0

90.0

60.7

62

.17

0.2

40

.05

7.8

94.6

14

.65

18

.73

12

.84

20.1

115.6

00

.95

12.3

27

.14

Ln

corr

ect:

Com

p

3.4

03.4

63

.53

3.6

54.2

74.0

34

.68

4.7

41

.58

1 .9

42

.71

2.7

62

.74

2.7

62.9

74.3

85.1

4.

4.4

25

.28

5.0

74

.46

4.2

03

.87

4.

344

.26

4.1

62

.04

2.5

02

.52

2.1

32

.68

3.8

53

.65

26

.02

16.7

82

9.7

44

8.8

74

.82

17

.53

10

.91

Lon

lota

l

3.4

23.4

83

.54

3.6

64

.51

4.3

15

.47

5.4

04

.01

3.2

62.8

32.9

92

.82

2.8

63

.05

4.8

67.2

91

3.5

96

.35

5.7

95

.02

4.3

94

.04

4.5

04

.35

4.2

22.8

04

.67

2.7

62.1

810.5

78.4

68

.30

44

.75

29

.62

49.8

56

4.4

75

.77

29.8

51

8.0

5

Bo

ug

ue

ranom

aly

(m

Gal)

-19

9.3

6-1

97

. 16

-19

5.2

0-1

98.4

5-2

01

.77

-20

3.0

9-2

03

.73

-20

1.

10

-188.7

4-1

92

.76

-191.9

4-1

91 .

46

-191.7

8-1

96.3

9-1

98

.88

-201.3

4-1

99.0

3-1

92

.13

-199.3

1-1

99

.99

-194.6

2-2

01

.07

-20

3.3

9-2

00

.54

-19

7.2

7-1

99

.07

-19

0.2

4-2

04.6

5-1

97

.10

-195.2

0-1

87

.54

-18

3.1

1-1

81

.3

5-1

92.1

4-1

96.2

1-1

98

.36

-17

1.8

0-1

91

.00

-183.3

8-1

85

.86

Page 23: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

REFERENCES CITED

Armin, R. A., John, D. A., and Dohrenwend, J. C., 1983, Geologic map of theFreel Peak 15-minute quadrangle, California and Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigatons Map 1-1424.

Chapman, R. H., 1966, Gravity base station network: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 90, 53 p.

Cordell, Lindrith, 1970, Iterative three-dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data: U.S. Geological Survey Computer Contribution 10, 12 p. Available only from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va., 22161; accession no. PB-196 979.

Eaton, G. P., and Watkins, J. S., 1970, The use of seismic refraction andgravity methods in hydrogeological investigations, -In Merely, L. W., ed., Mining and groundwater geophysics 1964: Geological Survey of Canada, Economic Geology Report 26, p. 544-568.

Erwin, J. W., and Berg, J. C., 1977, Bouguer gravity map of Nevada, Reno sheet: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Map 58.

Gimlett, J. I., 1967, Gravity study of Warm Springs Valley, Washoe County, Nevada: Nevada Bureau of Mines Report 15, 31 p.

Glancy, P. A., and Katzer, T. L., 1975, Water-resources appraisal of theCarson River basin, western Nevada: Nevada Division of Water Resources, Reconnaissance Report 59, 126 p.

Hayford, J. F., and Bowie, William, 1912, The effect of topography andisostatic compensation upon the intensity of gravity: U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Special Publication 10, 132 p.

Healey, D. L., 1970, Calculated in situ bulk densities from subsurface gravity observations and density logs, Nevada Test Site and Hot Creek Valley, Nye County, Nevada, in Geological Survey Research 1970: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 700-B, p. B52-B62.

Moore, J. G., 1969, Geology and mineral deposits of Lyon, Douglas, and Ormsby Counties, Nevada: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Bulletin 75, 42 p.

Oliver, H. W., Plouff, Donald, and Robbins, S. L., 1982, Bouguer gravity map of California Walker Lake sheet: California Division of Mines and Geology.

Pease, R. C., 1980, Geologic map, Genoa quadrangle [Nevada]: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Urban Maps Series, Genoa Folio, Map ICg.

Plouff, Donald, 1977, Preliminary documentation for a FORTRAN program tocompute gravity terrain corrections based on topography digitized on a geographic grid: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 77-535, 45 p.

-19-

Page 24: Gravity Survey and Depth to Bedrock In Carson Valley, Nevada … · 2010. 12. 3. · depth to bedrock for use in a ground-water model of the valley. This map delineates ... (1912,

Plouff, Donald, 1982, Gravity observations in the Walker Lake 1° X 2° quadrangle California-Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 82-405, 105 p.

Stewart, J. H., 1980, Geology of Nevada: Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 4, 135 p.

Stewart, J. H., and Noble, D. C., 1979, Preliminary geologic map of the Mount Siegel Quadrangle, Nevada-California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 79-225.

Zohdy, A. A. R., Eaton, G. P., and Mabey, D. R., 1974, Application of surface geophysics to ground-water investigations: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 2, Chapter Dl, 116 p.

-20-