gray chap07 riskmanagement

Upload: assad-ali-channa

Post on 04-Jun-2018

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    1/47

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    2/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 72

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    3/47

    INTRODUCTION

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 73

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    4/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 74

    BASIC DEFINITIONS

    Risk

    Uncertain or chance events that planning can not

    overcome or control. Risk Management

    A proactive attempt to recognize and manage internal

    events and external threats that affect the likelihood ofa projects success.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    5/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 75

    RISK MANAGEMENT QUESTIONS

    What can go wrong (risk event).

    How to minimize the risk events impact(consequences).

    What can be done before an event occurs(anticipation).

    What to do when an event occurs(contingency plans).

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    6/47Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 76

    Risk Managements Benefits

    A proactive rather than reactive approach.

    Reduces surprises and negativeconsequences.

    Prepares the project manager to take

    advantage of appropriate risks.

    Provides better control over the future.

    Improves chances of reaching project

    performance objectives within budget and on

    time.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    7/47

    RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 77

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    8/47Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 78

    The Risk

    Management

    Process

    FIGURE 7.2

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    9/47Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 79

    RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

    Step 1: Risk Identification

    Generate a list of possible risks throughbrainstorming, problem identification and risk

    profiling.

    Macro risks first, then specific events

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    10/47

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    11/47

    i. Scenario Analysis

    Done by assigning probability and impact

    measure to represent risk event.

    Proposed probability value=01.1/ 0.2, 0.3..Proposed impact measure=0,1, 2, 3

    These values need to be established upfront as

    to what they represent for each category ofevents

    eg. for cost (1=insifnificant cost increase, 2=10%

    increase, 3=10-20% increase, 4=20-40% increase,

    5=>40% increase)

    Cost scenario=probabilityXimpactCopyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 711

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    12/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 712

    ii. Risk Assessment Matrix

    FIGURE 7.4

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    13/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 713

    Risk Severity Matrix

    FIGURE 7.5

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    14/47

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    15/47

    iv. Probability Analysis

    Decision tree analysis

    Split decision into project/work alternatives

    For all alternatives, assign values and mutuallyexclusive probability of occurrences

    Continue splitting work into sub-works and assign

    values and mutually exclusive probability ofoccurrences

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 715

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    16/47

    v. Semi quantitative scenario analysis

    Similar to scenario analysis but using

    quantitative as well as qualitative values

    Probability = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3Impact value = low, moderate high

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 716

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    17/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 717

    RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

    Step 3: Risk Response Development

    Mitigating Risk

    Reducing the likelihood an adverse event will occur. Reducing impact of adverse event.

    Transferring Risk

    Paying a premium to pass the risk to another party.Avoiding Risk

    Changing the project plan to eliminate the risk or condition.

    Sharing Risk Allocating risk to different parties

    Retaining Risk

    Making a conscious decision to accept the risk.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    18/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 718

    RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

    Step 4: Risk Response Control

    Risk control

    Execution of the risk response strategy

    Monitoring of triggering events

    Initiating contingency plans

    Watching for new risks

    Establishing a Change Management System

    Monitoring, tracking, and reporting risk

    Fostering an open organization environment

    Repeating risk identification/assessment exercises

    Assigning and documenting responsibility for managing risk

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    19/47

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    20/47

    CONTINGENCY PLANNING

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 720

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    21/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 721

    Basic Definitions

    Contingency Plan

    An alternative plan that will be used if apossible foreseen risk event actually occurs.

    that will reduce or mitigate the negativeimpact (consequences) of a risk event.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    22/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 722

    Why Contingency Planning Required?

    Having no plan may slow managerial

    response.Decisions made under pressure can be

    potentially dangerous and costly.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    23/47

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    24/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 724

    Contingency Planning for Different Risk

    Types

    Technical Risks

    Backup strategies if chosen technology fails.

    Assessing whether technical uncertainties can beresolved.

    Schedule Risks

    Use of slack increases the risk of a late project finish.

    Imposed duration dates (absolute project finish date)Compression of project schedules due to a shortened

    project duration date.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    25/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 725

    Contingency Planning for Different Risk Types

    Costs Risks

    Time/cost dependency links: costs increase when

    problems take longer to solve than expected.rise in input costs (increase if the duration of a project

    is increased).

    Funding RisksChanges in the supply of funds for the project can

    dramatically affect the likelihood of implementation or

    successful completion of a project.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    26/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 726

    Contingency Funding and Time Buffers

    Contingency Funds

    i.e Funds to cover project risksidentified and

    unknown. Size of funds reflects overall risk of a project

    Form1: Budget reserves

    Are linked to the identified risks of specific work packages.Form2: Management reserves

    Are large funds to be used to cover major unforeseen risks(e.g., change in project scope) of the total project.

    Time Buffers

    Amounts of time used to compensate for unplanned

    delays in the project schedule.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    27/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 727

    Change Management Control

    Sources of Change

    Project scope changes

    Implementation of contingency plans

    Improvement changes

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    28/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 728

    Change Management Control

    The Change Control Process

    Identify proposed changes.

    List expected effects of proposed changes on scheduleand budget.

    Review, evaluate, and approve or disapprove of changes

    formally.

    Negotiate and resolve conflicts of change, condit ion, and

    cost.

    Communicate changes to parties affected.

    Assign responsibility for implementing change.

    Adjust master schedule and budget.

    Track all changes that are to be implemented

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    29/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 729

    The Change Control

    Process

    FIGURE 7.8

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    30/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 730

    Benefits of a Change Control System

    1. Inconsequential changes are discouraged by the

    formal process.

    2. Costs of changes are maintained in a log.

    3. Integrity of the WBS and performance measures is

    maintained.

    4. Allocation and use of budget and managementreserve funds are tracked.

    5. Responsibility for implementation is clarified.

    6. Effect of changes is visible to all parties involved.7. Implementation of change is monitored.

    8. Scope changes will be quickly reflected in baseline

    and performance measures.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    31/47

    PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookCopyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.

    THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS Clifford F. Gray

    Eric W. LarsonThird Edition

    Chapter 7 Appendix

    PERT and PERT Simulation

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    32/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 732

    PERTPROGRAM EVALUATION REVIEW

    TECHNIQUE

    Assumes each activity duration has a range

    that statistically follows a beta distribution. PERT uses three time estimates for each

    activity: optimistic, pessimistic, and a weighted

    average to represent activity durations.Knowing the weighted average and variances for each

    activity allows the project planner to compute the

    probability of meeting different project durations.

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    33/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 733

    Activity and Project Frequency Distributions

    FIGURE A7.1

    Tendency for work to

    stay late when delayed

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    34/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 734

    Activity Time Calculations

    The weighted average activity t ime is computed by

    the following formula:

    (7.1)

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    35/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 735

    Activity Time Calculations (contd)

    The variability in the activity t ime estimates is

    approximated by the following equations:

    The standard deviation for the activity:

    The standard deviation for the project:

    Note the standard deviation of the activity is squared in this equation;

    this is also called variance. This sum includes only activities on the

    cri tical path(s) or path being reviewed.

    (7.2)

    (7.3)

    Take note of the

    typographical error

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    36/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 736

    Activity Times and Variances

    TABLE A7.1

    Sum of sigma te squared = 44

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    37/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 737

    Probability of Completing the Project

    The equation below is used to compute the Z value

    found in statistical tables (Z = number of standard

    deviations from the mean), which, in turn, tells theprobability of completing the project in the time specified.

    (7.4)

    Take note of the

    typographical error

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    38/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 738

    THE Z TABLE

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    39/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 739

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    40/47

    EXAMPLE

    A hypothetical project, where:

    - the network is as given below

    - and we need to estimate the probability that itcan finish earlier than the schedule 67 (TS)days

    delivery period.

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 740

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    41/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 741

    CALCULATING THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE

    TIME THE CRITICAL PATH

    FIGURE A7.2

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    42/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 742

    CALCULATING THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE

    TIME THE CRITICAL PATH (contd)

    FIGURE A7.2 (contd)FIGURE A7.2

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    43/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 743

    Activity Times and Variances

    TABLE A7.1

    Sum of sigma te squared = 44

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    44/47

    CALCULATION OF PROBABILITY

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 744

    Z = 67 64/(root of 44)

    Z = 3/6.63Z = 0.452

    Limiting values:When Ts=64, Z=0.00, P=50%

    When Ts=infinity, Z=4, P=100%

    When Ts= negative infinity, Z=-4, P=0%

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    45/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 745

    Possible Project Duration

    FIGURE A7.3

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    46/47

    Copyright 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 746

  • 8/13/2019 Gray Chap07 Riskmanagement

    47/47

    Z Values

    TABLE A7.3

    Z = 67 64/(root of 44)

    Z = 3/6.63

    Z = 0.452

    Therefore probability of completing the project on the 67

    th

    days =67.36%. P(not completed on 67th days)=32.64%