grazing management effects on pasture growth: risksisks ......jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep...

35
Grazing Management Effects on Pasture Growth: Risks and Rewards Geoff Brink U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center USDA-ARS

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Grazing Management Effects on Pasture Growth: Risks and Rewards Geoff Brink U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center USDA-ARS

  • Introduction • Clipping vs. Grazing – why they’re different. • How we conducted this research. • Results – just the facts. • Implications – what does it mean to you?

  • Clipping vs. Grazing • Clipping is cheaper, faster, easier, and less

    variable than grazing.

  • Clipping vs. Grazing • In theory, defoliating grass with a blade or an

    animal’s mouth should be the same.

  • Clipping vs. Grazing

  • Nutrient equivalent of manure and urine

    Mineral Equivalent rate (lb/acre) Nitrogen 900 800 Phosphorus 250 10 Potassium 350 650 Sulfur 100 50 Calcium 650 10 Magnesium 200 10

  • meadow fescue MDF orchardgrass OGR quackgrass QGR reed canarygrass RCG

    • How we conducted this research.

  • 20"

    5"

    2"

    10" 12"

    6" 3" 1"

    Vegetative

    Mature

    Stubble height

  • Research site at Prairie du Sac

  • Heifers grazing vegetative grass

  • Heifers grazing mature grass

  • Before and after each grazing event

  • At the end of the grazing season

  • Precipitation (in.)

    0.0

    1.0

    2.0

    3.0

    4.0

    5.0

    6.0

    7.0

    8.0

    JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

    20092010Normal

  • Average annual grazed yield (lb DM/acre)

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    2009 2010

    MDFOGRQGRRCG

    a a

    a a

    b

    b

    c

    c

  • Results for vegetative grass

  • Annual grazed yield (lb DM/acre) @ vegetative stage

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    MDF OGR QGR RCG

    136

    Residue

    a b a

    a a a a

    a b b

    b b

  • 0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

    Gra

    ss g

    raze

    d (lb

    /acr

    e) Residue (in.) 1 3 6

    Yield distribution of orchardgrass @ vegetative stage

    20

    25

    40

  • 0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

    Gra

    ss g

    raze

    d (lb

    /acr

    e) Residue (in.) 1 3 6

    Digestibility of orchardgrass @ vegetative stage Di

    gest

    ibili

    ty (%

    )

    80

    60

    50

    40

    70

  • Persistence (tillers/ft2) @ vegetative stage in 2009

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    MDF OGR QGR RCG

    136

    Residue

    b a

    a

    a a

    b b

    b b

    a

    a

    a

  • Persistence (tillers/ft2) @ vegetative stage in 2010

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    MDF OGR QGR RCG

    136

    Residue

    a

    b b a

    b

    a a

    b a

    c

    b

    b

  • 6 in. residue 3 in. residue 1 in. residue

    Orchardgrass in November, 2009

    April 28 May 4 May 11

    Date when grazing began in 2010

  • Grazing vegetative grass:

    1) There is no annual yield reward for grazing lower than 3 inches, but there is risk of killing grass and delaying growth the following spring. • Reducing residue height for even one grazing

    event can reduce future productivity. 2) Take half – leave half management reduces

    annual yield; the rewards are shorter rotation intervals and earlier grazing in the spring.

    3) Forage quality is relatively unaffected by residue height.

  • Results for mature grass

  • Annual grazed yield (lb DM/acre) @ mature stage

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    MDF OGR QGR RCG

    2510

    Residue

    a b

    b

    a b

    a

    b

    a a

    a

    b

    b

  • 0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

    Gra

    ss g

    raze

    d (lb

    /acr

    e)Yield distribution of orchardgrass @ mature stage

    Residue (in.) 2 5 10

    55

    60

    80

  • 0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

    Gra

    ss g

    raze

    d (lb

    /acr

    e)Digestibility of orchardgrass @ mature stage

    Residue (in.) 2 5 10

    Dige

    stib

    ility

    (%) 70

    50

    40

    30

    60

    80

  • Persistence (tillers/ft2) @ mature stage in 2009

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    MDF OGR QGR RCG

    2510

    Residue

    a

    a a

    a a

    c

    b

    c

    b

    a

    a

    a

  • Persistence (tillers/ft2) @ mature stage in 2010

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    MDF OGR QGR RCG

    2510

    Residue

    a

    b

    b a

    b a a

    a a

    a

    a

    b

  • Grazing mature grass:

    1) Annual yield is increased by grazing lower than 5 inches, but there is risk of delaying growth the following spring. • Rhizomatous grasses may be more sensitive to

    residue height than bunch grasses. 2) Because grass is mature and livestock are

    generally not forced to graze closely, there is: • no reward for leaving a tall residue. • little risk of damaging pasture when mob

    stocking.

  • Surface litter at end of season (lb/acre)

    2009 2010

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Vegetative Mature Vegetative Mature

    ShortMediumTall

    Residue

    c

    a

    b c

    b

    c

    b

    c b

    a

    a a

  • The Bottom Line:

    Grass at vegetative stage of maturity is at greater risk of damage from poor grazing management than mature grass.

    Grass under stress (moisture, fertility) is at greater risk of damage from poor grazing management than healthy grass.

    Grazing Management Effects on Pasture Growth:�Risks and RewardsIntroductionClipping vs. GrazingClipping vs. GrazingClipping vs. GrazingSlide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Precipitation (in.)Average annual grazed yield�(lb DM/acre)Slide Number 16Annual grazed yield (lb DM/acre)�@ vegetative stageSlide Number 18Slide Number 19Persistence (tillers/ft2) �@ vegetative stage in 2009Persistence (tillers/ft2) �@ vegetative stage in 2010Slide Number 22Grazing vegetative grass:Slide Number 24Annual grazed yield (lb DM/acre)�@ mature stageSlide Number 26Slide Number 27Persistence (tillers/ft2) �@ mature stage in 2009Persistence (tillers/ft2) �@ mature stage in 2010Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Grazing mature grass:Surface litter at end of season (lb/acre)The Bottom Line: