great swamp watershed associationweb].pdfgreat swamp watershed association ... the challenge of...

42
THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: AN OVERVIEW Great Swamp Watershed Association 13 December 2012 Professor Joseph J. Seneca Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers University [email protected]

Upload: vantruc

Post on 11-Mar-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: AN OVERVIEW

Great Swamp Watershed Association13 December 2012

Professor Joseph J. SenecaBloustein School of Planning and Public PolicyRutgers [email protected]

Page 2: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

American Gothic (Grant Wood, 1930)

Source: The Art Institute of Chicago (http://www.artic.edu/artaccess/AA_Modern/pages/MOD_5_lg.shtml).

Page 3: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Addressing Climate Change

Source: The Economist, November 27-December 2, 2010.

Page 4: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

World Electricity Generation by Fuel Source, 2009

Coal and Peat40%

Oil 5%

Natural gas 21%

Nuclear 14%

Hydro 17%

Other 3%

Source: International Energy Agency - http://www.iea.org/stats/

Global Total: 20.1 million GwH

Page 5: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

World CO2 Emissions by Fuel Type, 2010

Coal and Peat41%

Natural gas 22% Petroleum

37%

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=79&t=11

Global Emissions: 31.8 Billion Tons of CO2

Page 6: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions by Country, 2009(billions of metric tons of carbon)

European Union0.9911%Russian

Federation0.435%

India0.546%

Japan0.303%

Other2.9434%

China2.1024% United States

1.4517%

Source: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.

Global Emissions: 8.7 Billion Metric Tons of CARBON

Page 7: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Per Capita Emissions by Country, 2009 (in metric tons of carbon)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

EuropeanUnion

RussianFederation

India Japan China United States

2.0

3.0

0.5

2.4

1.6

4.6

Source: Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR).

Page 8: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Implications of Carbon Emissions Data

Global Issue Needs International Solution(s) How to mitigate/adapt to climate change? How to reduce carbon fuel emissions? Costs – who pays? Equity/Fairness

Page 9: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

U.N. CO2 Emission Reduction Targets for Selected Countries

Country Target for 2020

United States 17% from 2005 level (4% from 1990)

(stated goal, not legislated)

European Union 20%-30% reduction from 1990 level

China40-45% per unit of GDP

from 2005 baseline

Russia 15%-25% reduction from 1990 level

Page 10: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Markets: Information & Signals

PricesCostsOutputs IncomesEmploymentChanges in all of the

above

Page 11: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

External Costs

External to Consumer or Producer

A Cost is generated

But not reflected in market

Market Outcomes are wrong (inefficient)

Page 12: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Examples of External Effects of Carbon Based Energy

Downwind damages from coal combustion Sea-level rise from CO2 emissions Storm frequency and severity Droughts/Floods Ecological system disruption Threshold catastrophe(s) (rapid melting of

Greenland ice sheet) Public health hazards

Page 13: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Issues: External Costs of Climate Change from CO2 Emissions

Complex and Uncertain

Effects Increase with Time

Difficult to Measure in $

Changes in Probabilities of Large Catastrophes (heat waves, floods, hurricanes, etc.)

Page 14: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Emissions GHG Concentrations

Temperature Change Economic DamagesSocial Cost of Carbon

Page 15: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

External Cost of Carbon EstimateU.S. Interagency Working Group, 2010

$42 (in $2007) per ton of CO2 emitted in 2020 (central tendency – wide variation)

What’s in the number? Agriculture Health Ecosystem services Property damages

Page 16: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Demand Side Policies

Can policies reduce and redirect energy demand to less carbon-intensive energy sources?

• For consumers who use heating and cooling, transportation, etc.?

• For businesses that use energy as an input?

• For public sector energy use (federal, state, local governments.)?

Page 17: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Supply Side Policies

Lower the amount of energy produced from carbon fuels

Provide incentives to change how energy is generated

Page 18: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Supply Side Policy: Technology

Incentives for new/clean Energy Technology

• Solar• Wind• Biofuels• Nuclear (?)• Hydroelectric

• INNOVATION!

Page 19: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

New Bio-Fuels – e.g., algae, perennialsTidal Farms

Next-Generation Technologies

Page 20: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Key Issues in Alternative Fuels

Are the technologies scalable?

What are the costs of new energy sources?

Are the costs competitive?

Page 21: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Public Policies To Change Energy Market Outcomes

RegulationsTaxesSubsidiesMarket Incentives

Page 22: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Policy Examples: Regulation

Technology Standards:Require specific technologies

Performance Standards:Producers meet them however they choose

Ambient Standards:Target for ambient levels of carbon, temp., etc.

Page 23: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

0KwH

$

Coal

Solar

Tax (Carbon) and Subsidize (Solar)

Subsidy15¢

Tax8¢

35¢

15¢

20¢

10¢

Natural Gas18¢

New extraction technology8 ¢

Page 24: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Economic Implications of Tax/Subsidy Policies

Who pays subsidies?

Do subsidies (ever) end?

Can we put a price on carbon?

Prices and costs matter!

Page 25: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

The New Age of Sail!

Page 26: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,
Page 27: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,
Page 28: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,
Page 29: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Carbon Tax Policy Examples

Country Carbon Tax

Sweden $150 (US) / ton CO2

British Columbia $30 (CAN) / ton CO2

Australia $23 (AUS) / ton CO2

Norway $15 - $62 / ton CO2

Page 30: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Source: The Economist.

Cap and Trade

Page 31: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Advantages of Cap and Trade

The CAP creates scarcity and can be tightened

The carbon price creates incentives to reduce emissions

Emitters can trade among themselves

Lowers the overall cost of CO2 reduction

Page 32: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Cap and Trade Examples

California – GHG Cap and Trade Program (2012!)

U.S. - SO2 Emissions (Acid Rain Reduction) (1990)

European Union – GHG Emissions Trading Scheme

New Zealand – Emissions Trading Scheme

Page 33: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Mitigation vs. Adaptation: Example

Sea Level Rise/Storm Surge (one of many consequences of global warming)Is it more cost effective to:Reduce emissions to prevent it?Or to develop ways to deal with the consequences

after it has happened? E.g., defense, strategic retreat

Example: What to do for the Jersey Shore?

Page 34: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

34Source: http://www.hi-techboats.com/Website_Pics/NEW_JERSEY_INLETS/07_Great_Egg_Harbor_Inlet.JPG

The Jersey Shore

Page 35: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Photo by Brian Thompson. Accessed from http://inhabitat.com/nyc/this‐roller‐coaster‐is‐in‐the‐ocean‐thanks‐to‐hurricane‐sandy/

Page 36: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,
Page 37: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,
Page 38: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,
Page 39: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Negative Impacts of Sandy

Wealth EffectSpending

Reductions due to loss of wealth

Medium to long term reduction in value of service flows generated by capital

stock

Lost Value of Capital Stock

(Housing, Commercial/Industrial, Infrastructure, Inventories)

Losses in Economic Activity

Immediate Short-Term Loss of Flows

Income, Sales, Output, Tax Revenues (income, sales)

Loss of Property Tax Revenues from

Damaged/Destroyed Stock

Lost Tourism Revenues

Transportation, Accommodation,

Multiplier Effects of Lost Flows

Employment, Income, Output, Tax Revenues

(income, sales)

Business Slowdown

Postponement of new businesses and expansions.

Page 40: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

Offsetting Impacts of SandyGains in Economic Activity

Post-Storm Rebuilding

(Households, Businesses, Govt.)

Construction Industry

Employment, Earnings, Material

Consumer spending pushed forward –

replacement of cars, etc.

Pre-Storm Preparation

Consumer and business spending pushed forward

Multiplier Effects Employment, Income, Output, Tax Revenues

Entrepreneurial Activity

InsuranceFEMA

Other Payments

Public Sector Spending

Infrastructure, equipment, etc.

Page 41: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

References

The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models and Environmental Policy. Nordhaus, William, Yale University, July 2007. http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/dice_mss_072407_all.pdf

Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use (Press Release and Executive Summary). National Research Council, October 2009. www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12794

Page 42: Great Swamp Watershed AssociationWeb].pdfGreat Swamp Watershed Association ... The Challenge of Global Warming: ... Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon,

References

Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866, Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, U.S. Government, 2010.

Integrated Assessment Models: DICE: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/mva/iamcc.tg/TGsec4-2-

15.html

PAGE: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/mva/iamcc.tg/TGsec4-2-16.html

CFUND: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/mva/iamcc.tg/TGsec4-2-21.html