greater birmingham and solihull local enterprise ... · 5 13:45 lep executive director’s report...

160
GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP BOARD MEETING Thursday 25 th April LEP Board meeting – 13.30pm-16.00pm Location: Mills and Reeve, 78-84 Colmore Row, Birmingham B3 2AB AGENDA Item Time Owner Subject Pre Read Presenter Purpose of the Report 1 13:30 Chair Welcome and Apologies N/A Tim Pile To note attendance and apologies 2 13:32 LEP Executive Notes / Matters Arising: 27 th March Attached Tim Pile To agree notes of the last meetings and any matters arising 3 13:35 LEP Board Review of Agreed Actions Attached Tim Pile To note progress against agreed actions 4 13:40 LEP Executive Forward Plan Attached Tim Pile To agree Forward Plan 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board ESIF Update Attached Darren Cope, Deputy Chair, ESIF Committee To note the progress of ESIF funding in Greater Birmingham and Solihull (GBS) LEP area, and to note the priorities for ESIF sub-committee. 7 14:00 Pillar Boards SEP Delivery Plan – Skills Attached John Callaghan/Paul Edwards To comment on and endorse the recommendations of the Employment and Skills Board (ESB) as to the priorities for the Skills Delivery Plan for 2019/20. To note the initial work of the LEP Executive, supported by the ESB, in development of a “Plan 10,000 Plus” to increase the cohort of learners commencing NVQ 3+ qualifications in the LEP area. 8 14:15 LEP Board 1001 Trades Project Attached (with Sophie Drake/Tony Bhajam, To note the 1001 Trades report and consider how the findings can be disseminated and

Upload: others

Post on 24-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP

BOARD MEETING

Thursday 25th April

LEP Board meeting – 13.30pm-16.00pm

Location: Mills and Reeve, 78-84 Colmore Row, Birmingham B3 2AB

AGENDA

Item Time Owner Subject Pre Read Presenter Purpose of the Report

1 13:30 Chair

Welcome and Apologies N/A Tim Pile

To note attendance and apologies

2 13:32 LEP Executive Notes / Matters Arising: 27th March

Attached Tim Pile To agree notes of the last meetings and any matters arising

3 13:35 LEP Board Review of Agreed Actions Attached Tim Pile To note progress against agreed actions

4 13:40 LEP Executive Forward Plan Attached Tim Pile To agree Forward Plan

5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments

6 13:50 LEP Board ESIF Update Attached Darren Cope, Deputy Chair, ESIF Committee

To note the progress of ESIF funding in Greater Birmingham and Solihull (GBS) LEP area, and to note the priorities for ESIF sub-committee.

7 14:00 Pillar Boards SEP Delivery Plan – Skills Attached John Callaghan/Paul Edwards To comment on and endorse the recommendations of the Employment and Skills Board (ESB) as to the priorities for the Skills Delivery Plan for 2019/20.

To note the initial work of the LEP Executive, supported by the ESB, in development of a “Plan 10,000 Plus” to increase the cohort of learners commencing NVQ 3+ qualifications in the LEP area.

8 14:15 LEP Board 1001 Trades Project Attached (with

Sophie Drake/Tony Bhajam, To note the 1001 Trades report and consider how the findings can be disseminated and

Page 2: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

2

Item Time Owner Subject Pre Read Presenter Purpose of the Report

presentation) General Manager, Doink implemented.

To hear the proposed next steps of the young persons’ agenda in response and offer any comments or suggestions.

9 14:30 LEP Executive 5G Infrastructure Project update

Attached (with presentation)

Henry Kippin, Director of Public Service Reform, WMCA

To note an update on the anticipated economic impact of the 5G infrastructure project

10 14:50 West Midlands Growth Company

A) FDI update

B) West Midlands Inward Investment Strategy

Attached (with presentation)

Nicola Hewitt, Commercial Director, WMGC

A) To note the interim FDI results for 18/19 and the current macro-economic challenges which are impacting the attraction of businesses to the GBS LEP area.

To note the impact of reduced funding for the West Midlands Growth Company (WMGC) to focus on the GBS LEP area, in relation to business attraction.

B) To note the regional investment strategy, approved by the West Midlands Growth Company (WMGC) Board, which will frame the business attraction work by WMGC for the next three years.

15:10 Break

11 15:15 Programme Delivery Board

Smithfield Project Presentation

Verbal (with presentation)

Jonathan Emery, Managing Director – Property, Lendlease Europe Bek Seeley, Chief Operating Officer – Development UK, Lendlease

To update the Board on the Smithfield Project

Page 3: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

3

Item Time Owner Subject Pre Read Presenter Purpose of the Report

12 15:35 LEP Board Delivery Plan Attached Katie Trout To note new requirement from government to publish annual Delivery Plan for LEP activities by 31 May 2019, including informal guidance developed by LEP Network

To receive and comment on draft proposed Delivery Plan for GBSLEP, which incorporates key LEP activities for the year 2019/2020

To delegate final sign-off and publication of designed Delivery Plan to the LEP Chair and LEP Director

13 15:50 LEP Board Budget 2019/2020 Attached Katie Trout To review and approve the Operational Budget proposals for the 2019/20 financial year.

To agree to allocate a maximum of £300,139 of funding from the Business Rates Pool (BRP) to support budgeted expenditure (see para 6).

14 15:58 LEP Board AOB N/A

Reports for noting

15 LEP Executive Communications update Attached N/A To note: media coverage highlights for March; progress in delivering the Stakeholder Engagement Plan; and the “Meet the Board” proposal

Page 4: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

1  

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP BOARD MEETING

Wednesday, 27th March

First Choice Group, Blakeney Way, Kingswood Lakeside, Cannock WS11 8LD

DECISIONS & ACTIONS

Present In Attendance Apologies Tim Pile Chair Katie Trout LEP Executive Cllr Ian Ward Birmingham CC Chris Loughran Deputy Chair Paul Edwards LEP Executive Cllr Brigid Jones Birmingham CC Cllr Patricia Ackroyd East Staffordshire BC Russell Eacott LEP Executive Cllr Bob Sleigh Solihull MBC Cllr Mike Wilcox Lichfield DC Peter Mawson LEP Executive Cllr George

Adamson Anita Bhalla

Cannock DC Performance Birmingham

Cllr Chris Rogers Wyre Forest DC Debbie Simpson LEP Executive Pat Hanlon Clive Heaphy

Birmingham CC

Cllr Gordon Alcott Cannock Chase DC Olaitan Alabi LEP Executive Cllr Ian Courts Solihull MBC Peter Jenion LEP Executive Matthew Rhodes Energy Capital Eric Henderson Staffordshire CC Saqib Bhatti Younis Bhatti & Co Ltd Alec Cameron Aston University Sophie Drake Story Comms Dean Piper Cannock DC John Callaghan Solihull College Perry Wardle Solihull MBC David Eastwood University of Birmingham Alison Jarrett Birmingham CC Mike Lyons HS2 Ltd. Ostap Paparega North Worcs Simon Marks Arcadis

Page 5: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

2  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

1 Welcome and Apologies

John Whitehouse, Managing Director of First Choice Group, welcomed the Board to the venue and gave an introduction to the First Choice Group company and their new site at Kingswood Lakeside, Cannock. The Board noted the following apologies: Cllr Ian Ward, Cllr Brigid Jones, Cllr Bob Sleigh (with Cllr Ian Courts attending as alternate), Pat Hanlon, Anita Bhalla and Clive Heaphy (Alison Jarret attended as Deputy S151 Officer), The Board noted that it was not possible to have political representation at the meeting from Birmingham City Council due to a meeting with the Improvement Panel. Disappointment at this clash was noted. It was noted that as part of the Future Operating Model, attendance at Board meetings would be collated and published.

The Board received the extremely sad news that Cllr Steve Claymore of Tamworth BC passed away in February after a short illness. The Board recognised the significant contribution that he made both to the economy of Tamworth and also to Greater Birmingham. Cllr Claymore was one of the founding members of GBSLEP and a committed Board Director. The Board marked its respect for everything that Steve had achieved.

Board attendance to be published

Ongoing

LEP Executive

Page 6: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

3  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

2 Kingswood Lakeside Access Project Update

The Board noted an update on the progress of the Kingswood Lakeside Access project from Eric Henderson, Staffordshire County Council Capital Projects Manager; Anthony Hodge, Staffordshire County Council Commissioner for Business & Enterprise; and Richard Smith, Managing Director for Opus Land Ltd.

Programme Delivery Board/ Eric Henderson/Anthony Hodge/Richard Smith

3 Notes / Matters Arising from the last meeting – 24th January

The Decisions and Actions Note from the last meeting on 24th January was endorsed as an accurate record.

4 Review of Agreed Actions

The Board noted progress updates for items on the Actions Log. The Board noted the successful launch of the GBSLEP Towns and Local Centres Framework on the 21st March at Lichfield Cathedral and agreed that this was a positive platform from which to build this important agenda.

LEP Executive to produce summary of GBSLEP’s approach to towns and local centres following the Towns and Local Centres Framework launch event.

April

Shanaaz Carroll/Katie Fulcher

5 Board Forward Plan

The Board noted the Forward Plan which outlines items scheduled for future Board meetings. The Board noted that there have been delays to sending out some of the Board papers for the March Board and that the LEP Executive will be reviewing the process for future meetings.

LEP Executive to review process for sending out Board papers for future meetings.

April

LEP Executive

Page 7: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

4  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

6 Director’s Report The Board noted the Director’s update on the strategy and activity of the LEP, including:

a) the need for an additional Board meeting in April, which will focus on strategic issues;

b) the intention to have a Board Away Day in May focusing on draft Delivery Plans;

c) the preparations that businesses, the GBSLEP and its partners are making for the various Brexit scenarios;

d) Key items on the agenda, including the Future Operating Model and the Growth Hub.

e) Progress with regard to programme delivery, including Kingswood Lakeside Access and the Paradise project.

Away Day to be arranged

End May 2019

LEP Executive

7 KPI Update The Board received the most recent KPI report outlining economic performance across the GBSLEP area. The Board noted the publication of labour productivity data since the last Board meeting in January 2019. Sub-regional labour productivity data for 2017 were released in February 2019 by the Office for National Statistics. The Board agreed that given the limited granularity of data at a local level, more work needs to be done to understand the specific economic impacts of LEP-funded projects.

. LEP Executive to continue exploring the economic impact of LEP interventions, drawing on research and expertise

September

LEP Executive

Page 8: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

5  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

from organisations such as City-Redi and What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth.

8 Growth Programme Update

The Board noted an update on the progress being made on the Local Growth Fund (LGF) Programme The Board received a verbal update on the discussions at the Programme Delivery Board on 20th March 2019. The Board noted that the Programme Delivery Board, at its next meeting, will review the LGF programme pipeline projects with a view to developing a prioritised list of projects that will enable the LEP to meet the end of programme target of £186m and the agreed outputs. It was noted that this exercise will also assist in the event of a need for a post-Brexit stimulus programme. The main assessment criteria for the programme will be project deliverability. All projects on the current list will be assessed, including those with significant provisional funding allocations like the Commonwealth Games. The outcome of this work will be reported to the LEP Board at its June meeting.

. Programme pipeline to be reviewed

June

Programme Delivery Board

9 Paradise Development project

The Board noted progress made, with particular reference to meeting the conditions which are attached to the LEP investment approval, as reviewed by the Programme Delivery Board on 20th March. The Board were updated as to discussions as

Page 9: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

6  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

late as that morning and were advised that matters were not complete but the target was to conclude conditions ‘a to f’ in the following 5 to 10 days. The Board agreed the explanatory commentary on the revised overage provisions, which were negotiated by Birmingham City Council (BCC) with Britel prior to the LEP Board decision on 20th December 2018, and which underpin the advice that the public sector investment at the level now approved will be State Aid compliant. The Board noted that the Full Business Case appended to the LEP Investment Report dated 02/10/18, had been superseded by a later version (dated 18/10/2018) that will be appended to, and form a key part of, the Service Level Agreement (SLA) (ie “Funding Agreement”) between the LEP and BCC. The Board noted the proposed variations to the contractual framework between Paradise Circus Limited Partnership (PCLP) to BCC. The Board agreed to delegate to the Chair, in consultation with the LEP Director and the Chair of the Programme Delivery Board, authorisation to monitor and agree the completion of all key documentation (including the MOU) required to meet the conditions so long as this was concluded by the 5th April 2019. The Board agreed that if this timeline is not met then it would receive a further report to the

Chair, Deputy Chair and Director to review progress and agree completion of key documentation if appropriate

5 April 2019

Chair

Page 10: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

7  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

April LEP Board.

10 Local Industrial Strategy Update

The Board noted progress and proposed next steps for the West Midlands Local Industrial Strategy. The Board noted that while the launch of the Local Industrial Strategy has been delayed due to Parliamentary business, work on developing the implementation plan is underway. The Board noted concerns about a lack of resources available to implement the strategy and agreed that the LEP Executive should outline recommendations for how to deliver the strategy if there are limited funds available. The Board agreed that the LEP should be proactive in developing substantive intervention(s) and seeking funding for them from Government

Paul Edwards to produce recommendations for how to implement parts of the Local Industrial Strategy in the scenario that future local growth funds are limited. Projects / packages of substantive interventions to be developed to support the LIS and LEP Delivery Plans and funding sought

June Ongoing

Paul Edwards LEP Board/ Executive

11 Pilot Innovation Programme

The Board approved £173,500 SEP Enabling Funds for a one-year pilot innovation programme to stimulate and support higher levels of business innovation in key growth industries. The Board requested that there be an update on

January 2020

Matthew

Page 11: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

8  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

progress of the Pilot Innovation Programme at a future meeting, including measures of success.

Rhodes/Paul Edwards

12 Growth Hub Next Phase

Cllr Ian Courts declared a conflict of interest on this item due to his role as Chair of the ESIF Sub-Committee. The Board approved:

a) the Growth Hub Next Phase Business Plan 2019-22;

b) progression of the LEP’s bid for £2.14m

ERDF to full application stage with the LEP as applicant and accountable body for the funding with an additional allocation of £400,000 SEP Enabling Funds as part-match; and

c) that delegated authority to approve the

full ERDF application be granted to the Chair in consultation with the LEP Director.

Full application to be signed off by the Chair

May 2019

Chair

13 Future Operating

Model The Board approved GBSLEP becoming a fully independent, operating company and, in doing so, agreed to the following recommendations:

a) ask BCC Cabinet to agree to undertake formal consultation on the TUPE transfer of staff, with an effective date of transfer

Page 12: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

9  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

of 1st July 2019;

b) delegate authority to the Remunerations Committee (if it is established – see recommendation xii below) to consider and agree T&Cs for new staff;

c) endorse the immediate commencement of recruitment for two positions (COO or equivalent and Head of Governance), on terms and conditions that mirror those of Birmingham City Council (BCC);

d) agree that GBSLEP applies for admitted body status to the West Midlands Pension Fund and continues to discuss the matter of guarantor with BCC;

e) delegate authority to the Remunerations Committee (if established) to develop options around pensions schemes for new starters;

f) agree that GBSLEP will hold its own revenue funding to be drawn down from BCC on a quarterly basis, save for a small sum of working capital (to be agreed by the LEP Director and BCC) to be drawn down as soon as possible to facilitate the acquisition of IT and systems;

Page 13: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

10  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

14 Governance The Board agreed to extend the terms of office of the following Non-Executive Directors until 30 November 2019:

a) Saqib Bhatti b) Pat Hanlon c) Simon Marks d) Matthew Rhodes

The Board noted that Sir David Eastwood will be stepping down as the GBSLEP Non-Executive Director representing higher education on 31 March 2019, and that Alec Cameron, Vice-Chancellor of Aston University will assume the role on 1 April 2019. The Board noted that Non-Executive Directors need to update their Registers of Interest for publication on the GBSLEP website. The Board noted the Gifts & Hospitality Policy, and the requirement for Non-Executive Directors to update the Executive of the receipt of gifts & hospitality.

Board Directors to send Register of Interest forms to LEP Executive LEP Executive to send regular reminders to Directors asking them to declare any gifts & hospitality they have received

April Quarterly

Board Directors/ LEP Executive LEP Executive/Board Directors

15 Assurance Framework

The Board noted the publication of the National Local Growth Assurance Framework. The Board agreed to the proposed revisions to the GBSLEP Assurance Framework, which will ensure GBSLEP is compliant, including:

a) The approach to managing contracts within

Page 14: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

11  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

the Financial Controls Policy; b) The approach to managing risk in the Risk

Management Strategy; c) The approach to publishing financial

information; d) The term limits on the Chair and Deputy

Chair, and the approach to recruitment and succession planning;

e) The Induction & Training Policy for Non-Executive Directors and Executive staff;

f) The Record and Document Retentions Policy; g) The process for making decisions by written

procedure; and h) A statement on regional roles and

responsibilities. The Board agreed to the revisions to the Assurance Framework and approved delegated authority for any final changes, specifically to the statement on roles and responsibilities to the Chair, in consultation with the GBSLEP Director. The Board noted that the Supervisory Board will consider the revised Assurance Framework on 11th April 2019.

Page 15: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

12  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

16 Audited Accounts The Board noted that Companies House agreed to an extension until 31st March 2019 for submitting GBSLEP Ltd’s annual accounts for 2017/18. The Board approved the Company’s audited accounts for 2017/18 for signature by the Chair for submission to the Company’s members and filing at Companies House by 31st March 2019, subject to some amendments to the Directors Strategic Report. The Board approved the Company’s audited accounts for 2013/14 to 2016/17 for signature by the Chair (2016/17) and another Director (tbc) and agreed that these should be submitted to the Company’s members and filed at Companies House in order to provide a clear line of sight as to how monies have flowed in previous years between GBSLEP and Birmingham City Council (BCC) as the Accountable Body for the funds, as well as the internal expenses incurred by the LEP in discharging its duties. The Board approved the Audit Clearance Memorandum for signature by the Chair. The Board noted that work to identify any Corporation Tax (CT) and Value Added Tax (VAT) liabilities is ongoing and that provision will be made for any liabilities in this year’s accounts. The Board agreed the need to refresh understanding of the roles and responsibilities of Directors and their

KPI table to be removed as it has been published in the Annual Report Accounts to be signed and submitted to Companies House Accounts to be signed and submitted to Companies House Note on responsibilities and roles of Board

27 March 2019 Before 31 March 2019 ASAP May 2019

LEP Executive Chair/LEP Executive Chair/agreed Director/LEP Executive LEP Executive/ Board Directors

Page 16: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

13  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

alternates, particularly given the FOM. Directors and alternates to be developed and shared Training to be provided as appropriate

June 2019

LEP Executive/Board Directors

17 Finance Update The Board noted an update to finances in Quarter 3 including forecast income and forecast expenditure.

18 AOB The Board noted the successful UK-India Healthcare conference, at which the Deputy Chair presented, which took place on the 22nd March at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. The conference showcased opportunities for collaboration between British and Indian healthcare sectors and involved participation from experts, dignitaries and businesses in the health and life science sectors. The Board thanked Professor Sir David Eastwood for his contribution to the LEP over the past two years, including his leadership of the sectors agenda and the Business and Innovation Pillar Board. In particular, the Board applauded his role in developing the life science sector.

N/A N/A N/A

Page 17: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 2  

14  

Item Number

Item Subject

Decision

Action

Timescale

Owner

FUTURE LEP BOARD MEETING DATES:

Thursday 25th April, Mills and Reeve, 78-84 Colmore Row, Birmingham, B3 2AB  Thursday 6th June, Midland Group Training Services, The Brook Building, Arrow Rd N, Redditch B98 8NN Thursday 18th July, Safari Academy, West Midlands Safari Park, Spring Grove Rd, Bewdley DY12 1LF

Page 18: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 3

ACTIONS LOG

The Actions Log is a record of actions agreed upon to support Board decisions. It provides an indication of the progress made against each action.

Board Date   Agenda Item Number  

Action  Agreed   Owner(s)  Date due  for completion  

Status   Progress update 

01/02/2018  12  LEP Director, Head of Strategy and Head of Delivery to complete the “Appointment of Bankers” form 

LEP Director /Heads of Strategy & Delivery 

21st February   On hold   Action being taken forward as part of the implementation of the Future Operating Model.  

13/09/2018  16  Chair to present proposals for a Board Director for the remit of Health and Wellbeing at a future date 

Chair  No date  Ongoing  This action is held pending a full review of LEP governance 

13/09/2018  18  The Board agreed to form an Alumnus group for past and present Directors of the LEP Board 

Chair  Early 2019  Ongoing  This action will be revisited later this year 

24/01/2019  8  Board Task and Finish Group to be formed to consider options relating to 

LEP Board/LEP 

February 2019 

Ongoing  Draft impact assessment has been prepared and is being consulted upon. 

Page 19: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 3

Board Date   Agenda Item Number  

Action  Agreed   Owner(s)  Date due  for completion  

Status   Progress update 

the LEP Review and prepare impact assessment for the Board 

Executive 

27/03/2019  1  Attendance at Board meetings to be collated and published. 

LEP Executive 

Ongoing  In progress 

Information is being collated and a way of presenting it on the website is being developed.  

27/03/2019  4  LEP Executive to produce summary of GBSLEP’s approach to towns and local centres following the Towns and Local Centres Framework launch event.   

Shanaaz Carroll/Katie Fulcher 

April  Complete  LEP Executive has sent a letter updating stakeholders about the LEP’s approach to towns and local centres  Summary of the key points from the launch event disseminated to the Board.  

27/03/2019  5  LEP Executive to review process for managing and distributing Board papers for future meetings. 

LEP Executive 

April  In Progress 

LEP Executive has reviewed the process for Board paper publication and is exploring options for managing the process via cloud software  

27/03/2019  6  Board Away Day in May focusing on draft Delivery Plans to be arranged 

LEP Executive 

End of May     Proposed dates will be sent to Directors shortly. 

Page 20: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 3

Board Date   Agenda Item Number  

Action  Agreed   Owner(s)  Date due  for completion  

Status   Progress update 

27/03/2019  7  LEP Executive to continue exploring the economic impact of LEP interventions, drawing on research and expertise from organisations such as City‐Redi and What Works Centre for Local Economic Growth. 

LEP Executive 

September  In progress 

LEP Executive has compiled a spreadsheet mapping economic data sources at a more granular level.   Programme team reviewing project outcome indicators following recent update of government guidance on Growth Programme indicators.  

27/03/2019  8  Programme pipeline to be reviewed with a view to developing a prioritised list of projects that will enable the LEP to meet the end of programme target of £186m and the agreed outputs 

Programme Delivery Board 

June  In Progress  

Due to be considered by the Programme Delivery Board at its 22nd May meeting 

27/03/2019    Chair, Deputy Chair and Director to review progress and agree completion of key Paradise Development project documentation if 

Chair  5 April 2019  Complete  Progress was reviewed on 5th April and the Chair agreed that the relevant conditions of grant funding had been met. The Service Level Agreement was signed on 12th April 

Page 21: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 3

Board Date   Agenda Item Number  

Action  Agreed   Owner(s)  Date due  for completion  

Status   Progress update 

appropriate 

27/03/2019    Paul Edwards to produce recommendations for how to implement parts of the Local Industrial Strategy in the scenario that future local growth funds are limited. 

Paul Edwards  

June   Ongoing   Discussions around implementation of Local Industrial Strategy in early stages with Black Country LEP, Coventry and Warwickshire LEP and the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA).  These will be discussed in full at the WMCA Strategic Economic Development (SED) Board in May with recommended approaches from a GBSLEP perspective to come to June Board. 

27/03/2019  12  Full ERDF application for Growth Hub Next Phase  to be signed off by the Chair 

Chair  May  Ongoing   Bid in development and on target for May submission. 

27/03/2019  14  Board Directors to send Register of Interest forms to LEP Executive 

 

Board Directors/LEP Executive  

April  Ongoing   Most forms have been received. LEP Executive requesting remainder of the forms by the end of April.  

27/03/2019  16  KPI table to be removed as it has been published in the Annual Report  

LEP Executive  

27th March 2019 

Complete  Directors Statement amended as agreed  

Page 22: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 3

Board Date   Agenda Item Number  

Action  Agreed   Owner(s)  Date due  for completion  

Status   Progress update 

27/03/2019  16  Audited Accounts for 2017/18 to be signed and submitted to Companies House 

Chair/LEP Executive 

Before 31st March  

Complete  Accounts signed and submitted before the end of March. 

27/03/2019  16  Audited Accounts for 2013/2014 to 2016/2017 to be signed and submitted to Companies House  

Chair/agreed Director/LEP Executive  

ASAP  In progress 

A clarification note to further explain the treatment of grant funding is being developed for inclusion in the accounts before they are signed.  

27/03/2019  16  Note on responsibilities and roles of Board Directors and alternates to be developed and shared 

LEP Executive/Board Directors 

May 2019  In progress 

A note is being drafted. 

27/03/2019  16  Training for Board Directors to be provided as appropriate 

LEP Executive/Board Directors  

June/July 2019 

In progress 

Content for the training is being developed and potential providers approached.  Possible dates will be shared with Directors shortly.   

 

Page 23: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP Board Forward Plan

 

Item 4 

Item   Purpose  Owner  Lead officer  Standing item/Regular item/ Ad hoc item 

Supervisory Board 

Thursday 6 June 2019 

Director’s Report  To raise and discuss headline business on the agenda, and to note performance against KPIs 

LEP Director  Katie Trout   Standing item   

Growth Programme  To update on Growth Programme progress ‐ Prioritisation  

Programme Delivery Board 

Russell Eacott  Standing item  Yes 

Enterprise Zone Programme

To update on the Enterprise Zone.

Approval of the EZ Investment Plan 2019 - 20(BCC/GBSLEP)

Programme Delivery Board

Russell Eacott Standing Item Yes 

HS2 Urban Realm EZ Project

To seek Board approval for investment in HS2 Urban Realm EZ Project

Programme Delivery Board

Wendy Edwards  Ad Hoc  

Local Industrial Strategy  To discuss proposed next steps for implementation of Local Industrial Strategy and its implications for GBSLEP activity 

WMCA SED Board  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

SEP Delivery Plans  To review and endorse the Delivery Plan for Business Support and Access to Finance 

Pillar Boards  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

Page 24: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP Board Forward Plan

 

Item 4 

Item   Purpose  Owner  Lead officer  Standing item/Regular item/ Ad hoc item 

Supervisory Board 

SEP Delivery Plan – Skills Plan 10,000 

To review proposals from the Employment and Skills Board and Executive to increase the cohort of learners starting at NVQ Level 3+ 

Employment and Skills Board 

Paul Edwards  Ah Hoc  Yes 

GBSLEP Operating Budget 2018+ 

To approve  the Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) for the 3 years after the budget period (2020‐2023) 

LEP Board  Katie Trout   Regular item (annual) 

Yes 

Board Composition   To consider draft proposals for the composition of the Board  

LEP Board   Katie Trout   Ad hoc   No  

FOM Implementation   To update the Board on the implementation of the Future Operating Model  

LEP Board   Katie Trout   Ad hoc   No  

Communications update   To update on the LEP’s communications activities  

LEP Executive  Katie Fulcher  Standing Item    

Thursday 18 July 2019 

Director’s Report  To raise and discuss headline business on the agenda, and to note performance against KPIs 

LEP Director  Katie Trout   Standing item   

Page 25: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP Board Forward Plan

 

Item 4 

Item   Purpose  Owner  Lead officer  Standing item/Regular item/ Ad hoc item 

Supervisory Board 

Growth Programme  To update on Growth Programme progress ‐  Q4 2018/19 Highlight Report 

Programme Delivery Board 

Russell Eacott  Standing item  Yes 

Enterprise Zone Update To update on the Enterprise Zone Q4 2018/19 Highlight Report

Programme Delivery Board

Russell Eacott Standing Item Yes 

Local Industrial Strategy  To discuss proposed next steps for implementation of Local Industrial Strategy and its implications for GBSLEP activity 

WMCA SED Board  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

SEP Delivery Plans  To review and endorse the Delivery Plan for Place‐making 

Pillar Boards  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

Statutory Accounts  To approve 2018/19 statutory accounts  LEP Board  Katie Trout   Ad Hoc    

Finance update   To update on the high‐level financial position, the capital programme, the revenue spend to date and the forecast outturn for the year. 

LEP Board   Katie Trout   Standing Item    

Communications Update   ‘Below the line’ report to update on the LEP’s communications activities  

LEP Executive   Katie Fulcher  Standing Item    

Page 26: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP Board Forward Plan

 

Item 4 

Item   Purpose  Owner  Lead officer  Standing item/Regular item/ Ad hoc item 

Supervisory Board 

Precision Technology Accelerator – Life Science Park 

To consider  investment in the Precision Technology Accelerator at the Life Sciences Park, Edgbaston 

Programme Delivery Board  

Wendy Edwards  Ad Hoc    

Commonwealth Games  To consider  investment in the Commonwealth Games 

Programme Delivery Board 

Wendy Edwards  Ad hoc   

Joint Scrutiny Committee Report  

To receive the Annual Report of the GBS Joint Scrutiny Committee 

GBS Joint Scrutiny Committee  

Paul Edwards   Annual   

Thursday 19 September 2019 

Director’s Report  To raise and discuss headline business on the agenda, and to note performance against KPIs 

LEP Director  Katie Trout   Standing item   

Growth Programme  To update on Growth Programme progress  

Programme Delivery Board 

TBC  Standing item  Yes 

Enterprise Zone Update To update on the Enterprise Zone Programme Delivery Board

TBC Standing Item Yes 

Local Industrial Strategy  To discuss proposed next steps for implementation of Local Industrial Strategy and its implications for GBSLEP 

WMCA SED Board  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

Page 27: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP Board Forward Plan

 

Item 4 

Item   Purpose  Owner  Lead officer  Standing item/Regular item/ Ad hoc item 

Supervisory Board 

activity 

SEP Delivery Plans  To review and endorse the Delivery Plan for Creative Industries 

Pillar Boards  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

Finance update   To update on the high‐level financial position, the capital programme, the revenue spend to date and the forecast outturn for the year. 

LEP Board   Katie Trout   Standing Item    

Communications Update  ‘Below the line’ report to update on the LEP’s communications activities 

LEP Executive  Katie Fulcher   Standing Item    

Thursday 21st November 2019 

Director’s Report  To raise and discuss headline business on the agenda, and to note performance against KPIs 

LEP Director  Katie Trout   Standing item   

Growth Programme  To update on Growth Programme progress  

Programme Delivery Board 

TBC  Standing item  Yes 

Enterprise Zone Update  To update on the Enterprise Zone  Programme Delivery Board 

TBC  Standing Item  Yes 

Page 28: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP Board Forward Plan

 

Item 4 

Item   Purpose  Owner  Lead officer  Standing item/Regular item/ Ad hoc item 

Supervisory Board 

Local Industrial Strategy  To discuss proposed next steps for implementation of Local Industrial Strategy and its implications for GBSLEP activity. 

WMCA SED Board  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

SEP Delivery Plans  To review and endorse the Delivery Plans 

Pillar Boards  Paul Edwards  Standing item   

Finance update   To update on the high‐level financial position, the capital programme, the revenue spend to date and the forecast outturn for the year. 

LEP Board   Katie Trout   Standing Item    

Communications Update   ‘Below the line’ report To update on the LEP’s communications activities. 

LEP Executive  Katie Fulcher  Standing Item   

 

Page 29: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 5

15/04/2019 1 of 2

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

Director’s Report Recommendations Board Directors are asked to:

1. Note the Director’s update on the strategy and activity of the LEP.

Key issues

2. On today’s agenda, Directors are being asked to consider a draft annual Delivery Plan. This sets out proposed activity over the coming year which will support the implementation of the LEP’s Strategic Economic Plan (SEP) and contribute to the West Midlands Local Industrial Strategy (LIS). The draft Operational Budget has been developed to support the delivery of this Plan. A significant increase in revenue funded activity from the Business Rates Pool is proposed to support further economic growth across the whole of the GBSLEP area.

3. Whilst the annual Delivery Plan summarises activity across the breadth of the LEP’s agenda, the Board’s focus on specific elements of it continues with the refreshed Skills Delivery Plan being a key item at this meeting. The proposed Plan has been revised to focus future activity on those interventions with greatest potential to make a difference to the skills challenges faced by the local economy. It highlights the areas where GBSLEP needs to focus its attention, which will be complemented by activity of other partners, such as the West Midlands Combined Authority. Collectively the aim is to make a significant difference to the skills agenda across the region.

4. It is important that our work on skills is informed by robust evidence and research. The 1001 Trades project looked at the reasons why the Tech sector does not attract young people, resulting in skills shortages for tech-based roles in the region. In order to become a leading global city region, Greater Birmingham will need to attract a higher percentage of young people to develop the technical skills we require to maximise the impact of new and developing technologies. Key findings of this Doink (part of the Beatfreeks Collective) project in partnership with GBSLEP and Nesta will be presented to the Board.

5. Directors may have also heard the recent announcement that the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Institute of Technology (IOT) consortium has been successful in its bid for an IOT, one of 12 in the country. This is excellent news for the region. The IOT is for Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering with a focus on emerging technologies and will include a state of the art Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Rig and other Industry 4.0 level equipment. The IOT is due to launch in time for the new academic year. The consortium is led by Solihull College &

Page 30: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 5

15/04/2019 2 of 2

University Centre, Aston University and Birmingham City University, working alongside South and City College Birmingham as a Core partner and supported by BMET College, University College Birmingham and the University of Birmingham. An Employer Advisory Board will ensure curricula are industry relevant, that there is strong industry engagement and access to workplace based learning opportunities. The GBSLEP Executive has supported the work of the consortium since the outset and will continue to be part of the Steering Board along with other key partners.

6. The Board will also receive an update on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) that has been attracted to Greater Birmingham and Solihull over the past year. Increasing levels of FDI into the area is an important element of our SEP, made even more critical given the challenges in bringing in new investment since the Brexit referendum. Directors will want to consider how this activity is resourced in light of the new West Midlands Inward Investment Strategy.

7. Presentations will also be given to the Board on two exciting opportunities for the

area 5G and Smithfield, both of which have the potential to realise significant economic growth. The LEP’s role will be discussed as part of both of these items.

Report by: Katie Trout

LEP Director Contact: [email protected] Date Created: 15th April 2019

Page 31: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 6

15/04/2019 1 of 3

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) Update

Recommendations

1. Board Directors are asked to:

Note the progress of ESIF funding in Greater Birmingham and Solihull (GBS) LEP area

Note the priorities for ESIF sub-committee

Background

2. In 2011 the European Commission (EC) published proposals for delivering EU funds in 2014 to 2020 using a Common Strategic Framework through three funding streams under the ESIF (European Structural and Investment Funds) umbrella:

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) with a focus on innovation and research and development, SME support and low carbon managed by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG);

European Social Fund (ESF) focusing on skills, employment and social inclusion managed by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP);

The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) focussed on tourism development and business support activity, managed by the Rural Payments Agency (RPA).

3. The Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP) has nominally been allocated €255.8 million of ERDF and ESF funds to be match funded 50% with other funding to cover the period 2014-20. €1.1 million of Rural Funding has also been allocated to the area.

4, The European Commission has also launched a specific initiative to tackle youth unemployment across the EU called the Youth Employment Initiative. Certain areas where youth unemployment is particularly high have been selected by the Commission for additional resource. It has selected the GBSLEP area as eligible to receive this extra resource to an additional £19m.

5. The role of the GBSLEP ESIF Committee is to advise the managing government agencies (“Managing Authorities”) on local strategic aims alongside national strategic and operational objectives and to ensure that maximum impact is achieved through the Funds, thereby contributing to delivery of the overall national programmes.

6. ESIF must be spent in line with strict financial targets and deliverables as set by

the European Commission. The Commission require a fixed amount of the funding allocated to each Operational Programme to have been spent within

Page 32: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 6

15/04/2019 2 of 3

three years of money being formally committed by the EU to the programme, known as the N+3 target.

7. For the England ERDF and ESF Programme, the first target is in 2018 and the

final target (100% of the budget) falls in 2023. If these targets are not met the amount of funding allocated to the Operational Programme will be reduced.

Key Issues

8. As part of Brexit negotiations, Her Majesty’s Government issued a Joint report on progress during phase 1 of negotiations under Article 50 TEU on the United Kingdom’s orderly withdrawal from the European Union. This joint report states that the UK will continue to participate in EU programmes financed by the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 and was agreed at the EU Council meeting on 15th December 2017. This means that funds defrayed through ESIF will be done so through EU budgets until the end of December 2022.

9. If there is a Brexit deal then the Programme will be fully funded on this basis. If there is no deal, there will be an extended Government guarantee of funding until 2020 with existing projects being under-written by the UK government. MHCLG will write to LEPs and Local ESIF sub-committees in more detail as the funding is expected to be through Her Majesty’s Treasury rather than the European Union.

10. To ensure maximum expenditure of funds, the Government intends to reallocate all LEPs’ unspent allocations into a national pot of funds. Locally based projects will still be able to apply to these national funds and we anticipate that this will be a good opportunity to bring forwards projects that complement, and allow early stage implementation of the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands. Appendices A and B set out current projects allocated and funded through ESIF.

11. At the ESIF sub-committee on 2 April 2019, MHCLG position is that the last GBSLEP call for ERDF will take place in summer 2019 with all unallocated funds then transferred to a national call to ensure that all funding is spent nationally.

12. The timetable for ESF is slightly different with the last local calls taking place in autumn 2019, with any surplus funds transferring to a national pot following these final calls.

13. The table included as Appendix C sets out the GBSLEP’s ESIF current funding position and deliverables. Commitment against ERDF sits at 86%, which is a strong position at this stage of the programme. Deliverables are well above target.

14. Allocations against ESF sit at c.65% with strong performance from contracted projects. A series of calls are planned over the next few months, working closely with the LEP Executive and partners, to increase levels of allocation.

15. The length of time being taken to appraise applications remains a key issue, particularly with ESF applications. To mitigate against this, DWP are moving to a single stage application process with a higher minimum value per application of £150k ESF (total value £300K) and a biweekly meeting is held with Catherine Blair, Head of European Social Fund and the Head of Appraisals with the purpose of reviewing applications and their status. The ESIF sub-committee will keep this progress under review.

Page 33: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 6

15/04/2019 3 of 3

16. It should be noted that GBSLEP originally took the position not to opt in to national provision for ESF instead finding the 50% match funding from local resources. Subsequently, in 2018, the ESIF sub-committee opted in to a national scheme operated by the Education and Skills Funding Agency in order to increase spend and delivery against the programme.

17. The devolution of the Adult Education budget (AEB) to the West Midlands Combined Authority could be used as a future source of match for ESF projects as it aims to engage adults and provide the skills and learning they need to equip them for work, apprenticeship or other learning.

18. The ESIF sub-committee will continue to monitor the ongoing position with regards to match funding for ESF.

Conclusion 19. As the ESIF programme nears conclusion, the overall programme is in a strong

position with plans in place by ESIF sub-committee and the Managing Authorities to address areas of potential under-allocation of funds and, where applicable, programme under-performance.

Report by: Paul Edwards Head of Strategy

Contact: [email protected] Date Created: 3 April 2019

Appendices a. Live and allocated European Regional

Development Fund projects as March 2019 b. Live European Social Fund projects as

March 2019 c. Unallocated funds and output performance

for Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP area

d. European Social Fund output performance for Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP area

Page 34: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

European Structural and Investment Funds 2014 - 2020

Growth Programme for England

Table 5: Project ERDF

Project Name and ApplicantGreater Birmingham and Solihull

Priority Axis Category of Region

Project Name Applicant Status ERDF£

Total£

Value of Projects

1 MD Advanced Services Growth ( ASG Dec17 ) Full £701,924.0 £1,403,847.0Aston University

1 MD Aerospace Unlocking Potential (UP) (GBS BC CAW SAS) Full £1,731,644.0 £3,463,288.0University of Nottingham

1 MD BSEEN DEC 17 Full £878,225.0 £1,756,451.0Aston University

1 MD Focus Digital ( Mar 18 ) Full £314,651.0 £629,300.0Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 MD Innovation Networks (1922) Full £983,596.9 £1,967,194.2Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 T Innovation Networks (1922) Full £53,167.4 £106,334.8Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 MD Innovation Vouchers Phase 3 Full £803,273.0 £1,606,542.0Aston University

1 MD Proof of Concept (1922) Full £378,216.3 £756,433.4Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 35: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

1 MD Science in Industry Research Centre (SIRC) Full £346,901.0 £693,802.0University of Wolverhampton

1 MD STEAMhouse – Digital Technologies Enabling Innovation Full £1,660,954.0 £3,321,908.0Birmingham City University

1 MD Advanced Materials Characterisation and Simulation Hub (AMCASH)

LIVE £2,398,108.0 £4,796,216.0University of Birmingham

1 T Advanced Materials Characterisation and Simulation Hub (AMCASH)

LIVE £79,659.0 £159,317.0University of Birmingham

1 T Big Data Corridor: A New Business Economy LIVE £120,164.0 £240,329.0Birmingham City Council – Digital Birmingham

1 MD Big Data Corridor: A New Business Economy LIVE £1,081,526.0 £2,163,051.0Birmingham City Council – Digital Birmingham

1 MD BSEEN LIVE £729,885.0 £1,459,770.0Aston University

1 T CALMERIC Composite and Additive Layer Materials Engineering Research and Innovation Centre

LIVE £166,861.8 £278,103.0University of Wolverhampton

1 MD Centre for Medical Devices Testing and Evaluation (MD-TEC) LIVE £3,473,344.0 £6,946,689.0University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

1 MD CIAMM LIVE £1,118,241.0 £2,236,482.0University of Birmingham

1 T CIAMM LIVE £46,593.0 £93,187.0University of Birmingham

1 MD DIGI-RAIL LIVE £909,904.5 £1,819,809.0University of Birmingham

1 T DIGI-RAIL LIVE £47,890.5 £95,781.0University of Birmingham

1 T Digital Innovation for Manufacturing (DI4M) LIVE £446,630.0 £850,885.0University of Warwick

1 MD Digital Innovation for Manufacturing (DI4M) LIVE £446,630.0 £850,885.0University of Warwick

1 MD EBRI LIVE £379,831.0 £759,662.0Aston University

1 T EBRI LIVE £113,456.0 £226,912.0Aston University

1 T Enabling Technologies and Innovation Competences Challenge LIVE £85,139.0 £170,278.0Aston University

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 36: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

1 MD Enabling Technologies and Innovation Competences Challenge LIVE £794,628.0 £1,589,256.0Aston University

1 MD Focus Digital LIVE £246,867.0 £493,746.0Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 T Focus Digital LIVE £45,311.0 £75,545.0Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 T GBSLEP - Alternative Raw Materials with Low Impact (ARLI) LIVE £34,592.0 £69,183.0University of Birmingham

1 MD GBSLEP - Alternative Raw Materials with Low Impact (ARLI) LIVE £830,201.0 £1,660,403.0University of Birmingham

1 MD Innovation Engine LIVE £1,532,115.0 £3,064,231.0Birmingham Science Park Aston

1 T Innovation Engine LIVE £97,795.0 £195,589.0Birmingham Science Park Aston

1 MD Innovation Networks 1518 LIVE £379,259.7 £758,519.4Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 T Innovation Networks 1518 LIVE £50,568.0 £101,135.9Coventry University Enterprises Ltd

1 MD Innovation Vouchers LIVE £534,310.0 £1,068,620.0Aston University

1 T Innovation Vouchers LIVE £58,257.0 £116,514.0Aston University

1 MD Innovative Product Support Services LIVE £187,369.0 £348,055.0University of Wolverhampton

1 T Innovative Product Support Services LIVE £280,880.0 £521,909.0University of Wolverhampton

1 MD Knowledge Exchange and Enterprise Network LIVE £260,031.2 £520,062.4University of Wolverhampton

1 T Knowledge Exchange and Enterprise Network LIVE £40,004.8 £80,009.6University of Wolverhampton

1 T Promoting Functional Materials in SMEs LIVE £35,028.0 £70,056.0Aston University

1 MD Promoting Functional Materials in SMEs LIVE £315,259.0 £630,518.0Aston University

1 T Smart Factory Hub (SmartFub) LIVE £69,929.0 £139,858.0University of Birmingham

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 37: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

1 MD Smart Factory Hub (SmartFub) LIVE £1,678,292.0 £3,356,591.0University of Birmingham

1 MD STEAMHOUSE LIVE £1,659,160.0 £3,318,320.0Birmingham City University

1 T STEAMHOUSE LIVE £104,840.0 £209,680.0Birmingham City University

1 T System Analytics for Innovation LIVE £34,120.0 £68,240.0Aston University

1 MD System Analytics for Innovation LIVE £375,320.0 £750,640.0Aston University

1 MD Promoting Innovation in SMEs Outline £565,776.0 £1,131,553.0Aston University

PA1 Total £29,706,328.1 £59,190,690.7

3 T Aston Prog for Small Business Growth DEC 17 Full £48,079.0 £80,133.0Aston University

3 MD Aston Prog for Small Business Growth DEC 17 Full £470,786.0 £941,568.0Aston University

3 T Business Growth Programme 2 (BGP2) Full £375,000.0 £795,600.0Birmingham City Council

3 MD Business Growth Programme 2 (BGP2) Full £3,374,996.0 £7,160,373.0Birmingham City Council

3 MD Diverse Supply Chains Full £492,497.0 £984,994.0Aston University

3 T Diverse Supply Chains Full £54,722.0 £109,443.0Aston University

3 MD Enterprise Development & Growth – Greater Birmingham & Solihull (Extension)

Full £1,227,389.0 £2,454,776.0Solihull MBC

3 T Enterprise Development & Growth – Greater Birmingham & Solihull (Extension)

Full £531,918.0 £886,529.0Solihull MBC

3 MD Manufacturing Growth Programme II Full £375,000.0 £750,000.0Oxford Innovation Services Ltd

3 T Manufacturing Growth Programme II Full £125,000.0 £208,333.0Oxford Innovation Services Ltd

3 MD Midlands Engine Export Grant Scheme Full £800,000.0 £1,600,000.0Department for International Trade (DIT)

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 38: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

3 T Midlands Engine Export Grant Scheme Full £200,000.0 £400,000.0Department for International Trade (DIT)

3 T Aston Programme for Small Business Growth LIVE £59,087.0 £118,174.0Aston University

3 MD Aston Programme for Small Business Growth LIVE £398,837.0 £797,674.0Aston University

3 MD Birmingham Knowledge Economy Business Incubation Partnership

LIVE £1,025,489.0 £2,050,978.0Innovation Birmingham (Aston Science Park)

3 MD Business Growth Programme (BGP) LIVE £8,933,708.0 £17,867,417.0Birmingham City Council

3 T Business Growth Programme (BGP) LIVE £992,634.0 £1,985,268.0Birmingham City Council

3 T Enterprise Development & Growth – Greater Birmingham & Solihull

LIVE £180,617.0 £301,027.0Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

3 MD Enterprise Development & Growth – Greater Birmingham & Solihull

LIVE £1,038,812.0 £2,077,628.0Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

3 MD Greater Birmingham & Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP) Growth Hub

LIVE £670,950.0 £1,341,900.0Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI)

3 T Greater Birmingham & Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP) Growth Hub

LIVE £287,550.0 £575,100.0Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI)

3 MD Investing in Greater Birmingham LIVE £1,617,795.0 £3,235,590.0West Midlands Growth Company

3 T Investing in Greater Birmingham LIVE £220,608.0 £441,216.0West Midlands Growth Company

3 T Manufacturing Growth Programme (MGP) LIVE £68,027.0 £113,378.3WMMBF Ltd

3 MD Manufacturing Growth Programme (MGP) LIVE £428,520.0 £857,040.0WMMBF Ltd

3 T Midlands Engine Investment Fund (PA3) LIVE £1,830,000.0 £6,200,567.0Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (“BEIS”)

3 MD Midlands Engine Investment Fund (PA3) LIVE £11,670,000.0 £39,541,317.0Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (“BEIS”)

3 T Property Investment Programme LIVE £205,200.0 £410,400.0Birmingham City Council

3 MD Property Investment Programme LIVE £2,074,800.0 £4,149,600.0Birmingham City Council

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 39: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

3 MD SME International Growth Project LIVE £358,340.0 £716,678.0West Midlands International Trade LLP

3 T SME International Growth Project LIVE £88,296.0 £163,694.0West Midlands International Trade LLP

3 MD Transforming SMEs to improve their revenues through the adoption of advanced services. (TRAN-SIP)

LIVE £584,046.0 £1,168,092.0Aston University

3 MD GBSLEP Growth Hub Outline £2,149,672.0 £4,215,045.0Greater Birmingham & Solihull LEP

PA3 Total £42,958,375.0 £104,699,532.3

4 MD Birmingham Home & Hub PA4 Full £1,125,176.0 £3,867,915.0Birmingham City Council

4 MD EBRI ( Sept 17 ) : Business Investment in Research - Successor Project

Full £273,499.0 £546,998.0Aston University

4 T EBRI ( Sept 17 ) : Business Investment in Research - Successor Project

Full £72,397.0 £144,794.0Aston University

4 T Inno Carbon - Eco-innovation support to SMEs Full £162,104.0 £270,173.0Birmingham City University

4 MD Inno Carbon - Eco-innovation support to SMEs Full £1,215,789.0 £2,431,578.0Birmingham City University

4 MD Multi-modal Sprint stops Full £952,001.0 £2,000,000.0West Midlands Combined Authority

4 MD Ward End Park Lakeside Renewal Project PA4 Full £671,477.0 £1,342,954.0Birmingham City Council

4 MD Accelerating Thermal Energy Technology Adoption (ATETA) LIVE £2,034,791.0 £4,069,583.0University of Birmingham

4 MD Low Carbon Growth Support LIVE £208,380.0 £416,760.0Groundwork West Midlands

4 T Low Carbon Growth Support LIVE £28,257.0 £47,363.0Groundwork West Midlands

4 MD Low Carbon SMEs (GBSLEP) LIVE £545,206.0 £1,090,410.0Aston University

4 T Low Carbon SMEs (GBSLEP) LIVE £60,580.0 £121,159.0Aston University

4 T Accelerating Thermal Energy Technology Adoption (ATETA) GBS

Outline £49,063.6 £98,127.2University of Birmingham

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 40: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

4 MD Accelerating Thermal Energy Technology Adoption (ATETA) GBS

Outline £564,231.4 £1,128,462.8University of Birmingham

4 MD Low Carbon SMEs 2 Outline £609,565.0 £1,219,130.0Aston University

4 MD SUD Outline £5,445,331.0 £10,083,946.0SUD ringfenced

PA4 Total £14,017,848.0 £28,879,353.0

6 MD Birmingham Home & Hub PA6 Full £112,000.0 £312,000.0Birmingham City Council

6 MD Ward End Park Lakeside Renewal Project PA6 Full £447,651.0 £895,302.0Birmingham City Council

6 T BASIS - Birmingham and Solihull Industrial Symbiosis LIVE £69,633.0 £139,266.0Birmingham City Council

6 MD BASIS - Birmingham and Solihull Industrial Symbiosis LIVE £626,694.0 £1,253,389.0Birmingham City Council

6 T Greening the Grey LIVE £213,090.0 £426,180.0Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

6 MD Greening the Grey LIVE £6,889,904.0 £13,779,809.0Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

6 MD Natural Rivers and Green Corridors LIVE £789,156.0 £1,578,321.0Birmingham City Council

6 MD Solihull Habitat and Nature Improvements LIVE £992,205.0 £1,984,410.0Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

6 MD SUD Outline £2,772,533.0 £3,522,870.0SUD ringfenced

PA6 Total £12,912,866.0 £23,891,547.0

Grand Total £99,595,417.1 £216,661,123.0

£198,756,352.1£91,662,669.0More Developed Total

£17,904,770.9£7,932,748.1Transition Total

£0.0£0.0Less Developed Total

Date produced: 25/03/2019

Exchange rate used: 0.0933

All Values are for ERDF only

Includes Financial Instruments

Page 41: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

European Structural and Investment Funds 2014 - 2020

Project Organisation ESF Value M-D ESF Value Trans I.P Call Reference

Call Closure

Date Status Other Information

Youth Promise Plus

Birmingham City

Council £33,600,000.00 1.3 OC12S15P 0033 Live

Business Elevator

Solihull College and

University Centre £1,259,299 2.2 OC12S16P 0298 Live

Higher Level Skills Match

Birmingham City

University £1,442,239.00 £213,904.00 2.2 OC12S16P 0298 Live

Positive Futures

Ashiana Community

Project £710,027.00 1.1 OC12S16P0382 Live

AEGIS in Communities The Muath Trust £2,000,000.00 2.1 OC12S16P0392 20/12/2016 Live

Employed for Success

Solihull Metropolitan

Borough Council £829,910.00 1.4

OCS12S16P039

1 20/12/2016 Live

Bridges to Success

Enterkey Training

Limited £1,431,951.00 1.4 OC12S16P 0391 20/12/2016 Live

PURE

Birmingham City

Council £6,500,000.00 1.4 OC12S16P 0391 20/12/2016 Live

Stepping Up The Muath Trust £1,600,000.00 1.4 OC12S16P 0391 20/12/2016 Live

Employment Plus previously known

as Access to Employment

The Salvation Army

Trustee Company £928,420.00 1.1 OC12S17P0739 30/06/2017 Live

Working2Succeed: Building

Community Pathways to Greater

Employment

Enterkey Training

Limited £1,431,951.00 1.1 OC12S17P0739 30/06/2017 Live

Progression Pathways

Birmingham City

Council £1,634,704.00 1.1 OC12S17P0739 30/06/2017 Live

Digital and Skills Birmingham -

Young People into the Labour Tin Smart Social Ltd £3,900,120.00 1.2 OC12S17C0804 05/10/2017 Live

Skills Support for the Workforce

and Redundancy ESFA 2.1 CFO Application n/a Live

Skills Support for the Workforce

and Redundancy ESFA 2.1 CFO Application n/a Live

Project Overview

Page 42: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Appendix A

ESIF Funding

ProgrammePriority CoR Unallocated to date Date Value

Likelihood of full

allocationIntervention Target Actual

MD £20.7m

Current live

call. Future

calls planned

£20.7m Low

T 0 N/A N/A N/A

MD £14.7m

Current live

call. Future

calls planned

£14.7m Low

T £3.2m

Current live

call. Future

calls planned

£3.2m Low

MD £2.55m May/June £2.55m High107 Enterprises Receiving

Support

807 Enterprises Receiving

Support

T £0.294k May/June £294k Medium

Likely that circa £180k would be left unallocated based on

previous requests.

Need for a transitional weighted project to be brought forward

to take up the allocation.

8 Enterprises Receiving

Support

57 Enterprises receiving

Support

MD £5.3m May/June £5.3m High330 Enterprises Receiving

Support

806 Enterprises Receiving

Support

T £2.7m May/June £2.7m Low

Likely that circa £2.265m would be left unallocated based on

previous requests.

Need for a transitional focussed project to be brought forward

to take up the allocation.

76 Enterprises Receiving

Support

141 Enterprises Receiving

Support

0 Enterprises Receiving

Support

67 Enterprises Receiving

Support

0 (Tonnes of CO2) Estimated

GHG Reductions

67 (Tonnes of CO2)

Estimated GHG Reductions

0 Enterprises Receiving

Support

15 Enterprises Receiving

Support

0 (Tonnes of CO2)Estimated

GHG Reductions

15 (Tonnes of CO2)

Estimated GHG Reductions

MD £2.84m May/June £2.84m Low

Some of the funding coud be allocated to existing projects, but

there is a need for new project activity to be brought forward to

take up the remaining allocation

33 (Has) Surface of habitats

supported in order to attain a

better conservation status

65 (Has) Surface of habitats

supported in order to attain

a better conservation

status

T £0.748k May/June 748k Low

Some of the funding coud be allocated to existing projects, but

there is a need for new project activity to be brought forward to

take up the remaining allocation

N/A N/A

ERDF SUD Priority 4 MD £2.67m April - Live call £2.67m Medium

ERDF SUD Priority 6 MD £2.02m April - Live call £2.02m Medium

EAFRD Growth

Programme - Business

Development

Rural 0 N/A 0 High

EAFRD Growth

Programme - Food

Processing

Rural 0 N/A 0 N/A

EAFRD Growth

Programme - TourismRural 0 N/A 0 N/A

£2m

GBSLEP's ESIF unallocated funds and Output Performance

2018 Performance Targets - Outputs

Part of Priority 4

Part of Priority 6

Need for new project activity to be brought forward to take up

the remaining allocation.

The ERDF Teachnical Assistance team and the P4 and P6 leads

are proactivily working with partners on bringing forward large

applications.

Need for new project activity to be brought forward to take up

the remaining allocation

Priority 4

T £0.44k May/June £44k LowNeed for new project activity to be brought forward to take up

the remaining allocation

ERDF Priority 6

MD £2m

N/A

Calls planned

ERDF

EAFRD

ESF Priority 1

ESF Priority 2

ERDF Priority 1

ESF

ERDF Priority 3

Shown as Appendix B

Shown as Appendix B

Need for new project activity to be brought forward to take up

the remaining allocation.

The minium call value has been raised from £50k to £150k to

encourge larger partner applications.

There is now a single stage application process rather than a

two stage process.

The ESF TA team have in place a robust call for application plan

with workshops and single applicant advice sessions in place to

cover the next 6-12 months.

The ESIF sub Committee have sought adavice from Dr Cathere

Blair, Head of Deputy Director, Head of European Social Fund

Division, Department for Work & Pensions on the use of Adult

Education Budget as match funding which wil be devolved to

the WMCA on 1.8.19

High

N/A

N/A

May/June

Page 43: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Appendix B

CO

01

- U

ne

mp

loy

ed

, in

cl l

on

g t

erm

un

em

plo

ye

d

O4

- P

art

icip

an

ts o

ve

r 5

0 y

ea

rs o

f

ag

e

O5

- P

art

icip

an

ts f

rom

eth

nic

min

ori

tie

s

CO

03

- I

na

ctiv

e

CO

16

- P

art

icip

an

ts w

ith

dis

ab

ilit

ies

O6

- P

art

icip

an

ts w

ith

ou

t b

asi

c

skil

ls

CO

14

- P

art

icip

an

ts w

ho

liv

e i

n a

sin

gle

ad

ult

ho

use

ho

ld w

ith

de

pe

nd

en

t ch

ild

ren

O8

- P

art

icip

an

ts (

be

low

25

ye

ars

of

ag

e)

wh

o a

re u

ne

mp

loy

ed

or

ina

ctiv

e

(no

t in

ed

uca

tio

n o

r

tra

inin

g)

O3

- P

art

icip

an

ts (

ag

ed

25

-28

) w

ho

are

un

em

plo

ye

d o

r in

aca

tiv

e (

no

t

in e

du

cati

on

or

tra

inin

g)

O9

- U

ne

mp

loy

ed

(in

clu

din

g l

on

g

term

un

em

plo

ye

d)

pa

rtic

ipa

nts

O1

0 -

Lo

ng

te

rm u

ne

mp

loy

ed

pa

rtic

ipa

nts

O1

1 -

In

act

ive

pa

rtic

ipa

nts

no

t in

ed

uca

tio

n o

r tr

ain

ing

O1

2 -

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

wit

h d

isa

bil

itie

s

O1

3 -

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

wit

h d

isa

bil

itie

s

O7

- P

art

icip

an

ts w

ho

are

off

en

de

rs

or

ex

-off

en

de

rs

CO

23

- n

um

be

r o

f su

pp

ort

ed

mic

ro,

sma

ll a

nd

me

diu

m s

ize

d

en

terp

rise

s (i

ncl

ud

ing

co

op

era

tiv

e

en

terp

rise

s, e

nte

rpri

ses

of

the

soci

al

eco

no

my

)

1.1 40% 43% 56% 32% 47% 33% 42%

1.2 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

1.3 114% 73% 0% 0% 15% 92% 79% 91%

1.4 71% 77% 56% 60% 83% 0%

1.5 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

2.1 8% 20% 7% 9% 7%

2.2 88%

Outside 10% of target

ESF Framework Outputs - Progress

Priority 1

Priority 2

Equal to or higher than target

Within 10% of target

Page 44: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 7

15/04/2019 1 of 3

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

Skills Delivery Plan 19/20

Recommendations

Board Directors are asked to:

1. Comment on and, if felt appropriate, endorse the recommendations of the Employment and Skills Board (ESB) as to the priorities for the Skills Delivery Plan for 2019/20.

2. Note the initial work of the LEP Executive, supported by the ESB, in development of a “Plan 10,000 Plus” to increase the cohort of learners commencing NVQ 3+ qualifications in the LEP area. It is intended that this proposal will be brought to the June Board for consideration.

Background

3. At the February 2018 Board meeting, the Board agreed to a focus on proactive activity from the LEP Executive on development of clear delivery plans for driving growth across the LEP geography.

4. These delivery plans were to consist of five plans for high growth sectors: life sciences; creative industries; business, professional and financial services; energy technologies and services; and advanced manufacturing and engineering.

5. These were to be complemented by five “cross-cutting” plans in digital technologies; emerging and disruptive technologies; skills; place; and business support.

6. At the November 2018 Board meeting, the Board requested that the next iterations of the Delivery Plans reflect an increased level of ambition, focusing on a smaller number of high quality interventions.

7. Working with the ESB, the LEP Executive have developed the next iteration of the Skills Delivery Plan to focus future activity on those interventions with greatest potential to make a difference to the skills challenges faced by the local economy.

Key Issues

Skills Delivery Plan

8. The ESB considered the revised GBSLEP Skills Delivery Plan at their January 2019 meeting with a further iteration provided for endorsement at their meeting on 12 April 2019.

Page 45: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 7

15/04/2019 2 of 3

9. The ESB recommends that LEP skills-based activity focus on identifying and driving the productivity and growth of the GBSLEP economy through a focus on GBS key sectors, by addressing the local business skills needs now, and in the future, through co-investment and collaborative working.

10. The revised Skills Delivery Plan (summary Plan provided in Appendix A) aims to strengthen local employer and industrial focus of LEP interventions compared with the previous iteration. In this way, it complements the work of the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) as the primary strategic skills lead in the West Midlands but one which has both a wider geographic and social agenda than the LEP.

11. The Skills Delivery Plan links to the wider Regional Skills Plan and the Local Industrial Strategy action plans being produced for the key sectors. It does not duplicate, but focusses on the real need to promote and encourage employers to invest in training for now and future needs.

12. As such, the overarching aims of the refocused Skills Delivery Plan are to:

Use partnership and collaboration to tackle skills shortages and gaps that are barriers to long-term business growth and productivity

Motivate and inspire people to develop skills for key sectors and technologies for growth

Develop employer led programmes to increase workforce diversity, to combat skills shortages and drive economic growth

Prime the adoption of disruptive and emergent technologies to enable skills development that matches today and tomorrow’s skills needs

13. The Plan responds to the GBSLEP Strategic Economic Plan headline KPI of increasing the % of Working Age Population with NVQ3+ to the National Average by 2025. However, the leading indicators as to the success of this plan will be measured by how many employers we encourage to engage, invest and participate in training.

“Plan 10,000 Plus”

14. As part of the development of the Skills Delivery Plan, the ESB noted that the proposed interventions, although important in addressing the skills gaps in Greater Birmingham will not, alone, meet the Board’s long-standing headline ambition to close the gap between the qualification levels at NVQ3+ levels to those of the national averages.

15. ONS data shows that the working age16-64 population of Greater Birmingham and Solihull is 1,253,900 and of those 652,800 are qualified at Level 3 and above (52.1%). This compares with the national average of 57.2%. To close the gap over the next five years, the GBS area needs an estimated 24,500 more people of working age each year to progress to level 3 and above.

16. The long term trend shows that around 14,500 each year on average are added. During the period 2007 to 2017, 167,900 more people were qualified to level 3. 2017 was exceptionally good performance at level 3 (27,700) but it is unclear if this is sustainable.

17. The ESB recommends that, to meet the headline KPI, GBS should take additional action by seeking to add new and additional provision of approximately 10,000 more

Page 46: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 7

15/04/2019 3 of 3

level 3 and above qualifications year-on-year to have confidence in closing the gap with the national levels.

18. To achieve this substantial change, it is likely that combined strategic leadership across a range of agencies is necessary to enable the step change required to deliver and close this gap. This requires a significant change from employers, providers and public agencies collaborating to open the opportunities for those who are wanting to progress and up skill to higher levels.

19. From a GBSLEP perspective this is likely to require increased partnership working, leadership in specific areas and increased resource from the LEP to drive forward this agenda.

20. If the Board agrees in principle with this ambition, the Executive will undertake further work to understand all the implications, including the resources required, and will work with the ESB to develop a programme of work. This would then be brought to the June Board for further consideration.

Conclusion

21. GBSLEP Board is asked to note the next iteration of the Skills Delivery Plan and endorse its areas of focus.

22. Board Directors are also asked to note the ambition of the ESB and the Executive to work towards increasing the cohort of students at NVQ Level 3+ by 10,000 year-on-year with a view to receiving a report outlining how this could be achieved at the June Board meeting.

Report by: Paul Edwards Head of Strategy

Contact: [email protected] 07712 436969

Date Created: 12 April 2019

Appendices a. Skills Delivery Plan 19/20

Page 47: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

 

Appendix A GBSLEP SKILLS DELIVERY PLAN – April 2019 

The GBSLEP Strategic Economic Plan 2016‐2030 mission is to create jobs and grow the economy, particularly by raising skills levels and stimulating demand led innovation to increase business and workforce productivity.  This Skills Delivery Plan directly responds to this and builds on the first GBSLEP skills delivery plan, approved by the LEP Board in February 2018, which identified market failures in the skills system and launched a range of interventions to address those needs during 2018. Since then the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) has launched the Regional Skill Plan and signed a Skills Deal with Central Government. Nationally, skills policy and funding continues to change alongside the business environment it supports. This revised plan updates our current delivery plan and sets out the direction for the next steps of GBSLEP support. 

Business needs are at the heart of this plan. All GBSLEP skill interventions are focussed on evidenced skills barriers to GBS economic growth. The aim of the interventions is to provide more opportunities for people to participate in growing the local economy and prosperity across the Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP area, enabling businesses to access the skilled labour they require for growth. 

The long‐term ambition is to accelerate an increase in our skilled workforce ensuring that the gap between our skills levels at least matches the national levels and meets the increasing local employer demands for higher skilled labour. Skills shortages and gaps that continue to increase as the local economy grows can act as a brake on the productivity and future growth of our economy.  As of 2017 data, this means that we need to upskill appropriately over 63,000 more people at NVQ Level 3 (A Level, Advanced Apprenticeships) and above to meet national levels: To reach this level we will require an approximate 10% increase in the current working age population qualified to NVQ Level 3+.  In a context of economic uncertainty and reducing public expenditure on the skills system, combined with employer forecasts for increasing need for higher skilled labour to enable their growth and competitiveness; we must work in partnership with stakeholders, providers, and employers to avoid duplication and maximise all the resources we have to deliver the biggest economic impact possible. 

Attracting new talent into the area and retaining skilled labour and graduates also forms part of the solution. We can do much to support this by ensuring that Greater Birmingham and Solihull is regarded as the most desirable place to study, work and live, thereby encouraging both an increased flow of appropriately skilled individuals into the region to fuel our economy and retain our existing skilled workers.  A skilled workforce is a critical enabler for sustainable economic growth that delivers increased higher level employment opportunities for GBS residents; taps the rich diversity and creative skills of the area; and primes the development of new skills for the future to maximise the benefits new technologies will bring to our economy and provides a head start on identifying new trends by having a workforce which is representative of our communities. 

Page 48: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

This is a living delivery plan. It will continue to develop and change as it is informed by shared knowledge, changing business needs and our skills growth ambitions. The plan aligns closely with the GBSLEP Growth Hub, where a number of support services are offered to help businesses to understand and grow their businesses. The plan aligns with the work undertaken at a wider West Midlands regional level by the West Midlands Growth Company, Midlands Engine and the WMCA. GBSLEP contributes to the emerging Regional Sector Employer Task Forces, development of the Local Industrial Strategies, as well as delivery of the Regional Skills Plan. GBSLEP is also a key member of the WMCA Regional Skills Advisory Board. This Skills Delivery Plan complements this delivery through the development of local projects and programmes tailored to meet local employer skill demands. 

Five main strategic drivers that underpin this plan are as follows: 

1. Skills Shortages and Gaps that limit business growth and productivity    

2. A young and richly diverse demographic 

3. National and Local Funding Policies e.g. Apprenticeships, devolution, Skills Deal, European Social Funds,  Local Growth  Funds and future UK Shared Prosperity Funds 

4. Fast Digital and Technological Change 

5. Collaboration and unified aims with strategic partners to enable effective delivery 

An area of strategic concern is the potential impact of Brexit. Withdrawal from the EU could potentially impact on the five strategic drivers listed above. The possible impact on business growth and especially on levels of EU skilled labour employed in our key sectors is yet to be determined, but only accelerates the need to address the domestic skills agenda. GBSLEP’s focus is therefore based on addressing skills needs, gaps and barriers that businesses have as a whole. 

GBSLEP Skills Purpose  

In line with the GBSLEP Strategic Economic Plan our core purpose of this delivery plan is as follows: 

To identify and drive the productivity and sustainable growth of the GBSLEP economy with focus on GBS key sectors for growth by addressing the local business skill needs now and in the future, through co‐investment and collaborative working. 

Headline KPI 

GBSLEP KPI 5 – Increase the % of Working Age Population with NVQ3+ to the National Average by 2025 

Page 49: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

 

 

Supporting Skills Performance Indicators 

Employers Investing in Training, Employer Skill shortages and gaps, Apprenticeship Starts by level, geographic area, sector, gender, age and BAME, All Qualification Levels, Higher Education Enrolments by discipline and available training provision matched to GBS key sector demands. West Midlands Skills Advisory Panel Toolkit and specific commissioned research will also inform and monitor the progress being made to continue to improve our workforce skill levels contributing to wider quality of life indicators. 

Outcomes 

Decrease local businesses skills shortages and gaps in both provision and skilled labour 

Increase the proportion of the Greater Birmingham and Solihull population with higher skills levels 

A ‘well‐known’ choice of quality training provision is in place to enable residents to upskill and meet the skills needs of local businesses and demands  created by rapid technological change 

A diverse, inclusive and productive local workforce that can compete on a global scale. 

More local businesses investing in people to improve productivity.  

Priority Sectors 

The GBSLEP area of focus is our key sectors for growth and technologies. They are: 

Advanced Manufacturing & Engineering  Life Sciences   Business, Professional and Financial Services  Energy Technologies and Services  Creative Industries 

Page 50: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Digital Technologies  Disruptive and Emerging Technologies 

This skills delivery plan integrates with the detailed stakeholder engagement, and sector delivery plans led by GBSLEP, and takes a cross sector approach to digital and emerging & disruptive technologies. 

An emphasis for GBSLEP actions will be placed on residents 19+ after statutory education completed and national education funding ends. WMCA and Career Services will lead on interventions and support for those young people in education working closely with the leadership of local authorities for the pre‐16 agenda. Joint working will facilitate the transition period for 16‐18 year olds facilitating a smooth progression pipeline into employment  

This data driven delivery plan aims to: 

1. Use partnership and collaboration to tackle skills shortages and gaps that are barriers to long‐term business growth and productivity  

2. Motivate and inspire people to develop skills for key sectors  and technologies for growth 

3. Develop employer led programmes to increase workforce diversity, to combat skills shortages and drive economic growth. 

4. Prime the adoption of disruptive and emergent technologies to enable skills development that matches today and tomorrow’s skills needs. 

In addition to this targeted work, the GBSLEP skills team provides strategic advice in terms of skill development and economic priorities to a range of educators, providers, new and existing investors and stakeholders. Working in a close relationship with all local authorities across the LEP area we seek to influence and inform policy formation. 

Project delivery is commissioned or co‐funded through our broad range of partners in the public, private and third sector. GBSLEP holds two funds, one for capital funding (Local Growth Fund), one for revenue funding (Strategic Economic Plan Enabling Fund). Expressions of interest that respond to this plan are welcome at any time. 

The marketing of the Skills Delivery Plan and associated interventions will be assisted by the new GBSLEP Stakeholder Engagement Team and GBSLEP Growth Hub. 

The summary table below provides the headlines for specific interventions.

Page 51: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

SKILLS Delivery Plan – Summary Table 

Skills Delivery Plan Aim  GBSLEP intervention 

Market Failure   Skills ‐ Barrier to Growth 

GBSLEP   Deliverables/ Milestones 

Success Measures  Outcomes & Outputs 

Actions  Lead and partners  

Allocated  LEP Resources   

SEP Enabling Fund Budget 

1. Use partnership and collaboration to tackle skills shortages and gaps that are barriers to long‐term business growth and productivity  

 

 

Clarify the level and quantum of employer skills training needs and commitments for our key sectors to maximise the impact and influence on local training provision.   

Lack of clear and evidenced understanding of the employer skills demand for each key sector to provide market confidence and direct new training provision driving employment levels and economic growth   

GBSLEP Skills Champions engaged for all key sectors.   GBSLEP to have a leading role in the Digital, Life Sciences and Creative Sector Regional Task Forces  Recognised major contributor to the Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering and BPFS skills agenda   Skills for Growth Hub  

More appropriately skilled people available to growing companies.  Increased confidence in the skill system that employer demand is evidenced to invest/grow new training provision.  Greater influence of GBS to advocate for employer skills needs and stimulate training provision to meet that demand with focus on 5 GBS key sectors at any one point in time  Number of new courses introduced to meet employers needs    

Engage  and  widen sector  engagement groups  Identify  &  facilitate new  training provision matched  with employer demands  Pilot  approach  to capture  skill  demands from employers/sectors  – Life  Sciences,  AME‐Aerospace 

GBSLEP  ESB WMCA Lead Employers Sector  Intermediaries Local Networks ESB   

Skills Team Sector Specialists  Data Specialist   Growth Hub (Employer feedback)  European Social Funds  

£40,000 

  Facilitate new employer led approaches to ensure training provision that better meets and keeps pace with demands 

Fragmented and low employer awareness and engagement with the local provision and pathways for new and existing staff to progress    

Build on and actively promote good practice through LEP and partner channels  Engage, promote and develop the network of existing sector based work academies to meet employer’s needs.  6 in place  

Increase of employers participating & shaping skills   Increase on current Apprenticeship programmes especially in ICT, Science and Creative/Arts  Graduate progression into regional SMEs  

Promote & Increase work academies – 6 now, add at least 3 more   Secure Dedicated Employer Skill Brokers  for Growth Hub  

GBSLEP  FE HE Employer Clusters/ Networks Councils,  Professional Intermediaries Independent Training Providers UTC’s 

Skills Team  Sector Specialists  Capital Growth Programme Team  European Social Funds  

£20,000 

Page 52: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Skills Delivery Plan Aim  GBSLEP intervention 

Market Failure   Skills ‐ Barrier to Growth 

GBSLEP   Deliverables/ Milestones 

Success Measures  Outcomes & Outputs 

Actions  Lead and partners  

Allocated  LEP Resources   

SEP Enabling Fund Budget 

 3 to develop to launch in 2019/20.  Formalise a skills capital fund pipeline. 

2. Motivate and inspire people to develop skills for key sectors and technologies for growth  

 

Highlight employment opportunities across our key sectors to ensure business growth and productivity is not inhibited through the lack of appropriately skilled staff.         

Incoherent information sources  sharing and inspiring people to choose to develop their skills that employers are seeking now and in the future  

1000 Apprentices using Ladder by September 2019  Number of people and businesses  engaged in supported projects   LMI data in easily understood formats highlighting skills areas of demand both current and predicted. 

Reduced employer recruitment difficulties    More Apprentices studying in skill needs area  Less employers reporting difficulties in recruiting skilled labour 

Seek to boost Ladder for GBS  Pop‐up events to promote work opportunities to all ages in wider community  Social Media Campaign  More Pathway Development for demand areas  Support CEC for GBS sector & employer priorities 

Education  GBSLEP  Prospects CEC  GBS wide Network of Enterprise Advisers  ESB   Career Leaders  

Skills team Growth Hub (shortages & Needs)  Sector Specialists  Comms/Social Media  CEC Apprenticeship Specialism project  CEC Careers Hub  CEC Primary Funds    

£40,000 

3. Develop employer led programmes to increase workforce diversity, to combat skills shortages and drive economic 

Support and promote new approaches to connect growing businesses to reach and encourage the entry of young 

Employers unable to reach the diversity of workforce they seek to grow   Wasted talent latent in our 

Complete 5 Cities Diversity  Project  1001 Trades Report   Identify and scope work for an intermediary to work 

Increase the pool of diverse talent available to growing businesses   Evidence of impact stronger diverse workforce on business success.  Increase of economic activity rates  

Women into Digital Industries  Share what works well with employers e.g. role models, marketing  

GBSLEP   ESFA 5 Cities staff  Employers   Community 

Skills team Growth Hub – employer leads  Communication/Social Media  European Social 

£100,000 

Page 53: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Skills Delivery Plan Aim  GBSLEP intervention 

Market Failure   Skills ‐ Barrier to Growth 

GBSLEP   Deliverables/ Milestones 

Success Measures  Outcomes & Outputs 

Actions  Lead and partners  

Allocated  LEP Resources   

SEP Enabling Fund Budget 

growth. 

 

 

and diverse talent into our key sectors for growth to drive economic growth. 

communities   with 3 pilot employers implementing by March 2020       

  Commission specialist intermediary to support at least 3 growing businesses  1001 Trades Report  BAME Graduate Employment Support 

Leaders  Intermediaries  Professional Bodies  WMCA  NCS/CEC/ Prospects 

Funds 

4. Prime the adoption of disruptive and emergent technologies to enable skills development that matches today and tomorrow’s skills needs. 

 

Encourage employer supported experimentation and early adoption in the use of new technologies for training in future skills needs.    

Reduced public funding results in risk aversion to try and develop new approaches to skill training  New technologies need new learning approaches/environments to skill development to exploit the full potential of an increasingly accessible and complex work environment.  

IoT Proposal National Award decision expected by March 2019  Digital Skills Partnership  Solihull AR/VR Centre  Employer Led ‘Boot Camps’   

More ‘early adopters’ of new technologies that ensures GBS reaches a tipping point as an area of strength attracting investment delivering growth.  No. of facilities and spaces adopting new approaches to future skill needs  Minimum of 2 new capital projects supported annually  Number of learners equipped with new skills sets in application of emergent technologies 

Support IoT Delivery   Promote & enrich e‐learning experiences – e.g. MIT Micro Masters expand and support in  GBS  Consider GBSLEP Challenge Competition  Support at least 2 capital projects priming new delivery  

GBSLEP   HE/FE  Employers‐ early adopters  R&D     

Skills Team Sector Specialists  Innovation Birmingham  Capital Growth Programme Team 

£20,000 

 

Page 54: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 8

15/04/2019 1 of 3

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

1001 Trades Report

Recommendations

Board Directors are asked to:

1. Note the 1001 Trades report and consider how the findings can be disseminated and implemented.

2. Hear the proposed next steps of the young persons’ agenda in response and offer any comments or suggestions.

Background

3. 1001 Trades is a Doink (part of the Beatfreeks Collective) project in partnership with GBSLEP, Nesta, and the young people of Birmingham exploring the question ‘why doesn’t the tech sector attract young people in the city?’

4. The research project sits in the context of skills shortages for tech-based roles in the region and the potential impacts of automation and the fourth industrial revolution. To ensure Birmingham becomes a leading global city by 2030, the City of 1001 Trades will have to attract a higher percentage of our young residents to develop the technical skills we require to maximise the impact of new and developing technologies.

Key Issues

Methodology

5. The research was split into four stages: ‘Download’, ‘Upload’, ‘Investigate’ and ‘Innovate’.

6. ‘Download’ created separate spaces for young people and employers to share their thoughts and feelings on the tech sector and what Birmingham’s tech sector looks like. This session also explored what ‘tech’ means and encouraged participants to comment on barriers to access they have experienced or are aware of.

7. ‘Upload’ brought together the young people in the development team, local and national employers and GBSLEP to explore the narratives and ideas that began to emerge during the Download sessions so that they could begin to identify common ground and points of departure between young people and employers. Once the group had established what they felt were important factors in deterring young people from applying for tech jobs in Birmingham, questions were built around those factors in a public consultation during phase three – ‘Investigate’.

8. ‘Investigate’ focused on engaging the public in conversations about tech and barriers to access which were highlighted during phase two – ‘Upload’. During this phase, the research team toured the ‘Root Of The Problem’, an artistic data capture installation

Page 55: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 8

15/04/2019 2 of 3

around colleges and public spaces, engaging 125 young people to bring as many young voices into the debate as possible. The installation posed five key research questions which were then expanded on through qualitative discussions and data capture.

9. ‘Innovate’ reconvened the young people in the development team, employers, and GBSLEP for a final session which brought together all of the project learnings and data sets collated in order to begin building observations and recommendations.

Key Findings

10. Better representation means deeper connections with role models: 50% of young

people want to work alongside/hear from people who look like them.

11. Young people want greater autonomy over how they learn: 35% want more hands-on tech projects in schools.

12. Tech can be made more exciting through real life experience: 66% want real-life tech examples to work on to make learning environments more exciting.

13. There was an emphasis from young people on the importance of role models over mere representation.

14. Young people see themselves as being as the most effective communicators around the benefits of a tech-based career. They feel if they were better informed they would be best placed to reduce barriers from parents, peers and support networks.

15. Employers and young people believed that tech learning environments are too often uninspiring and will require more employer involvement to become both inspiring and ensure industry relevant skills are developed.

16. Young people want to spend more time with employers, especially role models, experiencing technologies and tasks they would not otherwise experience.

Conclusion

17. The 1001 Trades report highlights the importance of role models who are reflective of our region’s demographics working in tech and tech-related roles and empowering young residents with an increased knowledge of tech based roles and skills pipelines. The Board is asked to reflect on how the LEP can work with partners to address some of the findings.

18. The 1001 Trades report has fed into the Skills Delivery Plan (item. 7b) especially around the action point of Develop employer led programmes to increase workforce diversity, to combat skills shortages and drive economic growth.

19. The Board is asked to consider how GBSLEP can use the 1001 Trades young person’s steering group to feed into GBSLEP policy making and the Future Economies project.

Report by: Sophie Drake Non-Executive Director for Young People

Contact: [email protected] 07432 460 201

Page 56: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 8

15/04/2019 3 of 3

Date Created: 09/April 2019

Appendices a. 1001 Trades Report

Page 57: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

1

Page 58: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

2

CONTENTS _

3 _ 1001 Trades - A Summary8 _ Foreword from GBSLEP

9 _ Who are GBLSEP?9 _ Skills agenda and delivery plan10 _ Who is Doink and Nesta?

12 _ 1001 trades - 5 key observations15 _ What’s Next?

16 _ Team - Young people?18 _ Meet the employers

21 _ Exploring the four phases of 1001 Trades

22 _ Looking at Phase 1 - Download26 _ Looking at Phase 2 - Upload29 _ Looking at Phase 3 - Investigate42 _ Looking at Phase 4 - Innovate

Page 59: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

3

SUMMARY

1001 Trades - Background to the project

Jobs are changing. The city is changing. Automation is coming.

What impact will this change have on young people developing

the skills of the future? How will employers adapt? Birmingham

is ‘the city of 1000 trades’, how will we stay ahead?

1001 Trades was a Doink project in partnership with GBSLEP,

Nesta, and the young people of Birmingham exploring the

question ‘why doesn’t the tech sector attract young people in

the city?’.

The research question and the outcomes have been informed

by findings from GBSLEP’s research and the development of the

recent skills agenda which highlights a gap in young people

from the city developing the skills sets needed for a growing

tech sector in the city.

Birmingham is home to more startups than any other city

outside of London. HS2 is headquartered here, we have

Innovation Birmingham, Silicon Canal, and a growing creative

industry. We can see that the economy of the city is changing,

and it is imperative to the future success of the local economy

and the young people who live here that young people are

enfranchised in this change.

The findings of this research project will directly influence the

shaping of GBSLEP’s skills delivery plan over the next two years.

Sophie Drake, Director of Young People at GBSLEP will lead on

Page 60: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

4

developing innovative ways for youth voices to shape policy,

with projects like this one modelling possible future formats.

1001 Trades was not another fruitless consultation process, the

project presents a real opportunity to engage young people

and employers in dialogue to create real and tangible change

in the city.

The project worked with a project team of six young people

aged 16 - 25 year olds, GBSLEP Directors, and stakeholders from

industry and education and followed four stages:

_ Download _

Understanding the thought and feelings of the project team,

GBSLEP, employers and training providers.

_ Upload _

Understanding what other people are thinking and the ‘wider

state of play’

_ Investigate _

Talking to young people in the city using our Root of the Problem

installation.

_ Innovate _

Bringing together all of our thinking and co-creating solutions

with all stakeholders.

Delivered by _

In Partnership with _

Page 61: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

5

“The answer to all of these questions is to put power into the hands of young people”

Page 62: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

6

The project team uncovered barriers to access by sharing

their own experiences and exploring the views and opinions

of employers and other stakeholders. The overlaps and gaps

in that data formed the basis of several questions put to the

public through Root of the Problem, a beautiful data capture

installation built by Doink in collaboration with Lilly Wales, a

mixed media artist based in Birmingham.

Questions asked centred around the importance of

‘representation’ and what that means, how ‘classrooms could

be made more exciting’, how young people could ‘better inform

their parents about their career choices’, and the best way to

get information to young people.

The answer to all of these questions is to put power into the

hands of young people, power here comes in several forms,

whether that be the ‘tools’ they need to communicate

information about tech to their families, who are influential

channels for careers advice, especially amongst young people

of minoritised backgrounds. It also means more control over

how they learn about tech, with young people demanding

‘more hands-on projects’ in schools, or suggestions for ‘modular

learning’ so that people can upskill themselves in particular

areas of their own choosing.

If young people want more autonomy over their career and

training choices, then it is employers who are best placed to

resource that autonomy, with ‘industry professionals’ being seen

as central to everything from making classrooms more exciting

to providing better role models for young people.

The need for role-models; good, proper role-models, was clear.

The project team reflected on how ‘not being able to see yourself

in tech organisations’ had a profound effect on whether or not

they might apply for jobs there, or even before that, to train

in that field. The need for role-models and not representation

through marketing or communications is the discerning factor

between what makes young people feel that an organisation

is ‘for’ them.

Photo: At the Innovate Session: Paige (left), Peter (right). Photography by Paul Stringer

Page 63: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

7

At the outset of this project, the central question was posed as

‘why aren’t young people attracted to tech jobs in the city’ this

was changed to “why doesn’t the tech sector attract young

people in the city?’ moving the onus from young people to

the sector, challenging them to move their goalposts to meet

the needs of young people in Birmingham. This discussion of

‘providing good role models’ feeds into a wider idea that young

people want to see more tech companies invest more in them,

firstly with cash to invest in hardware, software and training, but

on a deeper level to demonstrate that the sector is committed

to enfranchising them in the growth of the tech economy in the

city.

Photo: Faciltator Tarik with a college student at a college during Ivestiagte session. Photography by Paul Stringer

Photo: Millenium Point during Investiagte session. Photography by Paul Stringer

Page 64: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

8

Foreword from GBSLEP

Birmingham was once the workshop of the world, the City of

1000 Trades driving the industrial revolution and the world

economy. From x-ray to the steam engine, many of the most

important inventions originated in our city. Here at Greater

Birmingham & Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP)

we believe Greater Birmingham is on its way to regaining its

global standing.

The region continues to grow. We have the greatest increase in

economic output of any major city region outside of London, the

largest number of start-up companies and a higher quality of

life than Los Angeles and Rome. We have one of the largest tech

and digital sectors outside of London and digital technologies

are driving growth across all our key economic sectors. Standing

on the cusp of a new industrial revolution, driven by automation

and technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality,

we are well placed to accelerate this economic growth for the

benefit of all our residents.

To do so, we need to ensure our young citizens are able to

get the skills and support they need to turn their dreams and

aspirations into reality in Greater Birmingham. Birmingham is the

youngest city in Europe. We have people from over 180 different

nationalities calling our wonderful city home. Time and time

again I hear from employers moving into the region that our

diversity is our strength. And yet we are not seeing our young

residents, the people who will be at the forefront of the fourth

industrial revolution, entering into tech and digital roles at the

scale needed. GBSLEP is the first LEP in the country to appoint

a Board Director for young people and this groundbreaking

research project by Beatfreeks realises the start of our increased

engagement with our young residents.

This is the first step in giving our young residents a voice in

shaping the decisions which will drive economic growth for

all. I will ensure that the data and findings of this research will

directly influence the development of the new GBSLEP Skills

Delivery Plan as well as providing important data and findings

for policymakers right across the region.

By Sophie Drake,

Non-executive Director of Young People Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership

Page 65: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

9

Who is GBLSEP?

Our mission is to drive the economic growth of the Greater

Birmingham and Solihull area, creating jobs and increasing the

quality of life for all our residents.

The Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership

(GBSLEP) was established in 2010 as a partnership of business,

public sector and further and higher education leaders. Our

geography spans nine local authority boundaries:

Birmingham, Solihull, East Staffordshire, Cannock Chase,

Lichfield, Tamworth, Redditch, Bromsgrove and Wyre Forest.

We have a population of just over 2 million people and an

estimated 1,038,00 jobs, and an economy worth £46.8bn.

Greater Birmingham and Solihull is home to one of the largest

professional and financial centres outside of London, with a

world-leading advanced manufacturing base, burgeoning

creative and cultural industries and emerging strengths in

life sciences. We are the location of choice for international

companies such as Mondelez International, Deutsche Bank,

HSBC and Jaguar Land Rover.

What is GBSLEP’s Skills Agenda and Delivery Plan?

The GBSLEP Skills Delivery Plan is the constantly evolving

document which sets out the strategy and interventions for the

GBSLEP skills team. The stated aim of the plan is ‘To identify

and drive the productivity and growth of the GBSLEP economy

with focus on our key sectors by addressing the local business

skill needs now and in the future through co-investment and

collaborative working.’

The delivery plan aims to:

1. Tackle skills shortages and gaps that are barriers to long-

term business growth

2. Motivate and inspire people to develop skills in key growth

sectors and technologies

3. Unlock the potential of the young and diverse Greater

Birmingham population to meet business skills needs

4. Prime the adoption of disruptive and emergent

technologies to enable skills development that matches

today and tomorrow’s skills needs.

If you’d like to find out more about GBSLEP head to the Chamber of Commerce website

www.greaterbirminghamchambers.com

Page 66: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

10

Who are Doink?

Doink is a ‘do and think tank’, humanising data to tell better

stories and make better decisions.

‘Data’ is our lived experiences, thoughts and opinions, it is is the

building blocks that push forwards our narratives. To ‘humanise’

data is to make it tangible, something you can pick up, put

down, twist, thread, shake or poke; transforming data from an

ethereal number on a page into something physical, relatable,

and importantly something easily understandable. If we can

understand data better we can use it to make better decisions

about products, services, and policy. This is to ‘do’ to the ‘think

of Doink, don’t just have data and think about it, DO something

with it.

Doink creates fun and engaging installations and experiences

with partner organisations to carry out creative research and

evaluation. We harness the power of art and creativity to make

spaces and platforms for people to share their experiences,

thoughts and opinions, or to learn more about others.

Doink is based in Birmingham and is a part of the Beatfreeks

Collective; a group of people and companies using creativity

to do the incredible. Our sister organisations are Young Giant,

a youth engagement organisation which brings the young

people and decision-makers closer together, and Free Radical,

an arts-activism platform helping young people understand

how they connect to the world (or don’t).

Who are Nesta?Nesta is a global innovation foundation who “back new ideas

to tackle the big challenges of our time, from the pressures

of an ageing population to stretched public services and a

fast-changing jobs market.”. They believe that “innovation

- the creation and adoption of new ideas - is the key to

human progress, prosperity and happiness. But that too often

innovation doesn’t back the things that really matter to people.

[They] want to make innovation work for everyone - growing

new ideas that tackle the challenges our society faces and

change the world for the better.

In February 2018, Nesta launched a fund called ‘Everybody

Makes Innovation Policy’ EMIP. This fund aimed to answer

questions like “what are the best ways to get the public to

tell you their views on innovation research and policy” and

“what materials and methods are best able to capture the

public imagination’ Crucially, the fund aimed to uncover “what

methods can best influence the thinking of policymakers and

other professionals”. This project is partly funded by Nesta

through EMIP, and through the course of this project aims to

answer some of those questions.

if you’d like to find out more about Nesta and the ‘Everybody makes innovation policy’ fund head to

www.nesta.org.uk/project/every-one-makes-innovation-policy

If you’d like to find out more about Doink

and the wider collective, head to

beatfreeks.com/Doink

Page 67: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

11

“the more I think about how tech could be in the future the more I want to shape it”

Page 68: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

12

1001TRADES _ KEY OBSERVATIONS

Early on in the project, a lack of opportunities to see yourself

or people like you’ working in the tech sector was identified as

a huge barrier to access, especially for young women and for

people of colour. Only 17% of people employed in tech industries

in the West Midlands are female, and there was a lack of data

available on racial diversity in the workforce (which can be

telling in itself).

Conversations between young people and employers

uncovered a difference in opinion as to what ‘seeing yourself’

looks like. This difference was played out when young people

began talking about a need for role models and employers

were talking about a need for better representation. The

distinction between these two phrases is important, and can

be understood by looking at the finding that when asked ‘what

better representation looks like’, young people were almost

twice as likely to say that it was important to ‘work alongside

people like them’ who work in tech than they were to say better

representation involves marketing materials with people who

look like them.

This isn’t about guest speakers in classrooms either, with

that idea being ranked 4th out of four possible responses to

questions about what could make classrooms more exciting.

This is about deeper, longer-term engagement between young

people and people working in tech industries.

“We need role-models... not just representation”

Page 69: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

13

During phase four, some of the ideas generated centred on

tech ‘ambassadors’ working with schools to create long-term

relationships with young people. This also provides opportunities

for ‘alternative recruitment methods’. With tech-industry role

models taking an active part in helping young people see that

their skills sets, although not directly related to tech, being

useful in tech sector jobs.

The need for better-informed families was highlighted early on

as a barrier to young people pursuing tech at college level and

beyond. The obvious solution to this is to connect employers and

parents so that they might learn more about what tech careers

can look like, and dispel myths regarding the lack of security

they provide. Helping parents to understand that is definitely

important, but this research has shown that what young people

want is to be given the tools they need to communicate these

ideas themselves; they want autonomy.

This can only come through empowering them with tools and

information. Almost 35% of respondents to the question ‘what

could help your parents to better understand tech careers’ said

that better tools would help them, making it the most popular

response to that question. 28% said that ‘more information

for parents’ would help, but in conversation those same

respondents talked about needing to understand tech better

so that they could share that information with their parents, one

young person referred to not creating spaces akin to parents

evenings where the ‘grownups’ talk and young people are

sidelined.

The 35% of young people who talked about more hands-on

projects reflect a need to redesign learning environments and is

talked about in another observation for this project, but it also

reflects a desire to literally take learning into their own hands.

The idea for ‘modular learning’ developed during phase 3 also

suggests that young people want to be more active in forging

their own career paths and making active decisions about their

own learning.

The extent to which young people view tech sector employers

as being key to creating change became apparent when young

people were generating ideas for the delivery plan during the

Innovate phase.

One of the first ‘areas of common ground’ that young people

and employers identified was a belief that teaching learning

environments are boring at best, and inadequate at worst. Both

sets of stakeholders reflected on personal experiences of dull or

unuseful classes, or teachers who lacked the proper knowledge

or ability to inspire our future workforce in the city.

Employers and tech professionals are key to bringing these

lessons to life. Be that through hands-on projects, or real-life

We want empowerment through autonomy

We need the tech industry to step up and make tech learning more exciting

Page 70: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

14

experiences, a combined 60% of young people agreed that this

could make classrooms more exciting.

The third most popular answer involved using tech outside of IT

classes, and was developed into a ‘solution’ during the Innovate

session, whereby the project team suggested companies using

‘tech challenges’ in schools to incentivise young people to

pursue tech, whilst demonstrating the transferability of skills

across tech industries, and that ‘tech doesn’t just mean IT’

When asked ‘what would improve the advice you get’, families

were important (11%), but the opportunity to hear more from

people working in tech was three times as important (37%).

Elsewhere, young people highlighted a need for access to

tech hardware, software, and training opportunities, and have

suggested that employers should ‘step up’ and fill this gap. There

is cross-over here between a need for employers to fill the gap

in making classrooms more exciting, but it is important to make

this distinction. Young people are talking about technologists

in their classrooms, but a need for ‘investment’ (both cash and

resource) points to a need for deeper engagement, the need

for ‘role models’ highlighted elsewhere in this report.

Young people want to spend time with employers. That involves

‘the opportunity to work alongside people like them’ or ‘the

opportunity to hear from people who look like them’, or simply

‘more time spent with people working in tech’

This is a rallying call for GBSLEP to take these requests to

employers. Employers like those who told us that ‘young people

aren’t applying for tech jobs’ at the outset of this project so

that they might see that young people are calling out for them

too. GBSLEP is well placed to facilitate this future growing

relationship and should consult further with young people and

employers to establish what that relationship might look like.

We need the tech industry to step up and invest in young people

Page 71: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

15

What next?

This report is the culmination of a series of conversations

addressing the barriers to access that exist in Birmingham and

cause the existence of a gap in young people applying for tech

jobs in the city.

The next phase entails GBSLEP reviewing the observations this

report makes, as well as understanding the data collected

through the public consultation during phase three.

All of this should be understood in light of the views, thoughts,

and experiences shared during ‘Download’ by the project

team and employers. Finally, GBSLEP should take into account

suggestions and thoughts raised during the Innovate session

and use those findings to inform the creation of the delivery

plan during 2019.

GBSLEP have committed to engaging young people in this

process too, with the fantastic project team who came together

for 1001 trades being invited to consult further with the LEP to

formulate the plan.

Doink will commit to facilitating this process as needed.

Page 72: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

16

TeamFor this project to successfully address the question of ‘why

young people (and particularly young people of colour and

young women) aren’t applying for tech jobs in Birmingham’,

1001 Trades had to be grounded in the experiences of young

Brummies who might be applying for those jobs (or not,

depending on their experiences).

For this reason, Doink brought together a ‘project team’ of five

young people of colour, all aged between 16-25, four of whom

were young women. All of the group had some experience of

tech, were working in tech industries, or wanted to expand

their understanding of the tech sector.

Paige, 26, Freelance Creative Producer _

“I was curious to learn more about tech jobs and opportunities

in Birmingham and to also understand why I knew so little about

this sector. It was a fantastic opportunity to speak with other

young people and leaders in tech and to learn that actually,

most people work with tech within some capacity. I am excited

to see how education opportunities will increase in the future

and also to see how marketing can become more accessible

to encourage young people from a plethora of backgrounds

to engage with tech in the future.”

Carolyn Sudgier, 26, Student _

“I had a keen interest to get involved with the 1001 trades

project to be able to engage with young people in a unique

creative way. As technology jobs are growing, it is vital for

young people to be aware, acknowledge and understand

that there are a variety of opportunities within the technology

industry. Also, having a technology job is a career!”.

Page 73: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

17

Sipho Eric Ndlovu, 24, Performance Artist & Writer _

“For a while now I have been interested in the integration of

the arts, research and academia, and 1001 Trades seemed

to me to be a great project which would utilize multiple

disciplines to try to uncover some truths about a widely

concerning issue for our generation. As more insight is being

unveiled about the Tech Sector, I think it’s high time young

people are given access to information about tech roles

and be able to ask questions which are important to them;

especially regarding tech jobs and how exclusive they can

seem at times. “

Huawa Ottun, 22 _

“I was really interested in finding out the role tech economy

is going to play in the future city’s and what they are doing

or plan on doing to make sure young people are not left

behind”

Layla Chishti, 17 _

Layla is a 6th form student currently studying in Birmingham.

She joined this project to explore her interest in the growing

tech economy of the city.

Sophia Mohammed, age _

Sophia joined 1001 Trades as she was interested to learn

more about how she can shape policy in the city and was

particularly interested in removing obstacles for young

women in tech.

Page 74: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

18

Meet the employerstrainers and GBSLEP representatives

Engaging young people in identifying opportunities and

barriers was crucial, but so was engaging the gate-keepers in

the tech sector, for this reason the research team reached out

to employers and training providers across the West Midlands

to hear about their experience as tech sector employers, and

to work with them to understand how they might be able to

resource the changes that ‘1001 Trades’ proposes need to be

made to engage more young people in tech jobs in Birmingham:

Sophie Drake, Non-exec director of young people - GBSLEP _

Sophie is currently the UK’s first Director for Young People on

the GBSLEP board – tasked with galvanising the skills and

engagement of the city’s young people. She also acts as

the marketing lead for Birmingham Future’s Infrastructure

Committee. A first-class graduate of Birmingham City

University, she was part of the founding team of PR agency

Story Comms in her final year of study and now serves as an

account manager for clients across the corporate and business

sectors across the UK. Her former experience spans marketing

and communications roles at Birmingham City University and

national employee benefits firm Busy Bees Benefits.

Peter Cripps, Software Architect, IBM UK Limited _

Peter works with IBM’s clients in helping them adopt technology

to solve their business challenges. He currently focuses on

blockchain and is involved in helping companies of all sizes

understand this exciting technology as well as finding new and

innovative ways of using it. Peter is also very active in the tech

ecosystem in Birmingham where he advises new and growing

companies on technology and also works with universities

and colleges in the area where he speaks to students about

technology as well as IBM.

1001 Trades has been a real eye-opener to me in highlighting

not just those areas that are lacking in matching the skills of our

young people with employers perceptions of what is needed

but also in just how intelligent, committed and passionate the

young people of the West Midlands actually are. I have come

away feeling far more positive about our future.

Page 75: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

19

Nicole Chalmers, Head of Research at Thalamus _

For Birmingham to thrive as a city in the coming decades it

must be at the forefront of the technical revolution, just as it

was during the industrial revolution. We must equip our young

people with skills and knowledge, and spark their passion

for technology and how it can change the world, in order to

safeguard their futures and our future as a city.

Research projects like 1001 Trades are essential in building

a bright future for the young people of Birmingham. The

team have done an excellent job of analysing this issue from

different angles, considering varying viewpoints, and using

several data gathering methods without an agenda, which

has allowed them to build a deep understanding of this

complex issue.

Cec Richards - CEO - Slenky

“1001 trades feels likely a valuable project with the potential

to help business and young people better understand what

how to bridge the gap between tech employment and the

young audience needed to make the society of tomorrow.

As a platform focused on connecting young people with the

world of business, Slenky is happy to support the aims and

objectives of 1001 trades”

Davina Pancholi - CEO/Founder - Rightgig

Davina is the founder of Rightgig, a digital recruitment

platform which connects people to jobs based on skills and

passions instead of job histories.

Kath Preston - Consultant - Bseen Enterprise Support - Aston

University

Kath is a consultant for ‘the Birmingham Skills for Enterprise and

Employability Network. They provide workshops, networking

opportunities, tailored mentoring, grants, and workspace at

their partner universities for graduate entrepreneurs who are

trying to grow their ideas into businesses.

Page 76: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

20

Page 77: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

21

Exploring the four phases of 1001 Trades

What were the four phases - a quick look‘1001 Trades’ was carried out in four phases; ‘Download’,

“Upload’, “Innovate” and ‘Investigate”. These four phases moved

through conversations with young people and employers, then

to a wider consultation with college students, ending in a

session bringing together all of the project learnings to build

the observations at the start of this report.

“Download” created separate spaces for young people,

employers, and GBSLEP to share their thoughts and feelings on

the ‘tech sector’ and what Birmingham’s tech sector looks like.

This session also explored what ‘tech’ means and encouraged

participants to comment on barriers to access they have

experienced or are aware of.

“Upload” brought together the young people in the

development team, local and national employers and GBSLEP

to explore the narratives and ideas that began to emerge

during the download sessions so that they could begin to

identify common ground and points of departure between

young people and employers. Once the group had established

what they felt were ‘important’ factors in the young people

not applying for tech jobs in Birmingham, questions were built

around those factors public consultation during phase three;

Investigate.

“Investigate” focused on engaging the public in conversations

about tech and barriers to access which were highlighted

during Phase Two: ‘Upload’. During this phase, the research

team toured the ‘Root Of The Problem’ installation around

colleges and public spaces to bring as many young voices into

the debate as possible. The installation posed five key research

questions which are expanded on during the next section of

this report.

“Innovate” reconvened the young people in the development

team, employers, and GBSLEP for a final session which brought

together all of the project learnings and data sets collated in

order to begin building observations and recommendations for

GBSLEP and the development of the delivery plan for the skills

agenda for Greater Birmingham and Solihull.

Phase 1 _ Download

Phase 2 _ Upload

Phase 3 _ Investigate

Phase 4 _ Innovate

Page 78: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

22

Exploring the four phases more deeply

Looking at Phase 1 _ Download

1. All jobs will include tech in the future

2. Young people don’t feel ready for those jobs, and that is

linked to perceived lack of training opportunities

3. Employers say young people don’t always need tech skills

for tech sector jobs

4. Young women and people of colour need better role models

and/or representation in the tech sector if other young

women and people of colour are to explore jobs in the sector.

5. Poor tech learning environments affect young people’s

future choices

6. A lack of understanding about what ‘tech’ amongst parents

is a significant barrier to overcome.

‘Download’ sessions are all about understanding people’s

viewpoints through conversations. Doink hosted a session for

young people and spoke to several employers and training

providers via phone and posed several key questions to them:

Key ideas emerging from phase 1 _

What did we ask?

Page 79: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

23

Young People’s Project Team:

1. What jobs will you be doing in the future?

2. What do tech sector jobs look like now?

3. What will tech sector jobs look like in the future?

4. How ready are young people in the city for now tech jobs?

Employers and Training Providers:

1. What barriers and obstacles do young people face when

trying to develop skills in tech or launch careers in tech?

2. What are practical ways of overcoming barriers and

obstacles?

3. What does support look like, and who does it come from?

4. What research and other work has already been done in

this area?

5. Why are young people (especially young women and

people of colour) not represented in emerging and

established tech industries?

The project team agreed that “all jobs will be tech jobs in the

future”. One of the group reflected on how “you’ll still need

lawyers in the future, but the role will change”.

Similarly, the team seemed confident that they understood

what the ‘tech sector’ was, and commented that ‘people are

confused. They miss out creative and graphic design jobs”.

Young people know that ‘tech’ is not just ICT based roles. In

light of this, it was interesting to see the conversation after that

focusing on “access to hardware” as a major obstacle to young

people learning more about tech and conversations revolving

around the ability to code and to create programmes. There’s

a gap here, young people understanding that tech permeates

all fields of work and study, but practically still seeing the sector

and jobs within it as centring on traditional ICT based roles.

This confidence in knowing what the tech sector is was tempered

further by a general consensus in the room that young people

were “not very” ready for new tech jobs in the city. This was

attributed to a lack of understanding of what is available by

way of training opportunities, or of progression routes in tech

sector roles. One young person commented that “I don’t know

where all of these supposed opportunities are”, why aren’t we

being told about them?”. This was coupled with a perceived

lack of access to opportunities depending on geography,

one young woman spoke of her experience that “you get big

courses in some places like Erdington, but not in Handsworth”.

This uneven spread of opportunities extended to affluence

and race too, with comments shining a light on the availability

of ‘community ‘ focused opportunities and who they were

available too, and questioned raised about people from some

minoritised communities not. Interestingly, this focus on training

What did we hear in “Download”?

Page 80: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

24

and skills development was not shared by all employers, with

some of them commenting that “life experience can be more

important than sitting at a desk” and that transferable skills are

equally important but that ‘young people don’t know they’ve

got them” or that you don’t have to be technical to work in tech,

it takes a whole team!”.

Conversations about training opportunities quickly turned into

conversations about learning environments and the sense

that “ICT [teaching and learning in schools] is really outdated”.

This became a major theme of the conversation, five of the

six young people in the session made explicit mention of

inadequate or “boring” learning environments being a reason

that young people are not applying for tech jobs in the city.

The group talked about ICT classrooms needing “more hands-

on experiences” and that tech classrooms “only cover the

basics” and don’t employ ‘enough critical thinking’. This focus

on classrooms is important, two members of the group made

reference to not having pursued tech beyond secondary school

on account of bad classroom experiences.

If a young person does overcome uninspiring environments and

wants to pursue IT based qualifications, then they face another

obstacle; family or parental confidence. One young woman

commented that “when I speak to my family, they don’t know

tech, they tell me not to do it, but that’s because they don’t

know it” and that “my parents didn’t get it when my brother

did computer science, they asked him ‘why would you want to

fix lights’, it’s a generational thing, they just don’t get it”. The

group (who were all from minoritised communities) agreed that

they felt this was a particular issue for young people from their

backgrounds. This barrier has interesting implications for the

findings of this project; the removal of barriers has to engage

more stakeholders than just the young people themselves.

Conversations about race turned into conversations about

wider representation and accessibility along the lines of gender.

The group were quick to agree that ‘education is gendered,

it starts so early’, and this continues throughout school, one

young woman shared her experiences that the school she went

to ‘had a tech pathway programme, but only 3 out of 10 people

on it were female.” This was within a context of girls being made

to feel that ‘all girls wear skirts and can’t do any sports’, and

lead her to the question “what can girls do?!”. Tech companies

were seen as largely white spaces, and this “affects whether or

not a person is comfortable in a space and liable to apply for

a job in that space”. One young woman explained how when

“[she] goes for a job or into a new place, [she] seeks out the one

black person, because it’s always only one, and will gravitate

towards them”.

Better role models and representation are the obvious fix, “but

it is not as simple as ‘having a black person in your advertising’.

One of the employers shared a story about actively seeking to

Page 81: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

25

recruit women of colour to improve diversity within their team.

They produced a marketing campaign with good racial and

gender representation, took special care over the language

and selection process to attempt to remove biases, and still did

not receive any applicants from the desired group. To view this

through a different lens, one young person told us that

‘’putting a black person on a poster does not make for better representation”.

Employers were particularly attuned to a need for better

representation, knowing that ‘if you do a google image search

for the tech entrepreneurs, it shows you pictures of white young

men’, and that ‘it’s hard to be what you can’t see, in schools

we need to make ourselves more visible”. They also understood

that gender plays a role, one (female) tech CEO told us that

[her] brother was encouraged to play with computers, I was

encouraged to sew”.

However, there was a divergence between young people and

employers as to what better representation looked like. The

project team expressed a need for deeper and more meaningful

engagement between companies, training providers, and

young people. Young people are savvy to tick box attempts at

inclusivity that are centred on ‘diverse’ marketing campaigns

and called out for ‘real role models’. The difference between

good role models and better representation was explored more

fully as a question during the ‘investigate’ phase of this project.

The employers we spoke to were keen to tackle these issues, as

they understand the intrinsic value of having diverse workforces

and how young people, in particular, can bring exciting ideas

and experiences to the table to build better solutions to

problem-solving.

Page 82: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

26

Key ideas emerging from phase 2

Looking at Phase Two _ Upload

The key ideas from phase one were codified into four distinct

themes which formed the basis of the questions to be asked in

the next phase:

1. A need for better representation and what that means

2. A need to engage families in conversations about tech

careers and what that could look like

3. A need to make tech learning environments more exciting

and explore what that entails

4. A need to improve communication particularly careers

advice, and explore what that encompasses

‘Upload’ brought the project team, GBSLEP, and some

employers together to review some of the ideas emerging

from the conversations during phase one and encouraged

participants to explore common themes and overlaps in ideas

between those conversations as well as with some statistics to

understand the wider context of the tech sector in Birmingham.

These conversations helped to identify key stats, thoughts,

ideas, or findings that were The group then worked together to

answer these two key questions:

1. What are the most pressing issues facing young people

when accessing tech sector jobs in Birmingham?

2. What questions can we build around these ideas to help

understand those issues better?

What did we hear in “Upload”?

This phase provided a much-needed space for all stakeholders

to learn from each other’s points of view in order to understand

the wider picture of what is going on here. The project team

were interested to learn about the scale of the wider West

Midlands tech sector, encompassing nearly 14,000 tech and

digital business in 2016. This makes it the fifth largest sector in

the West Midlands Combined Authority.

What did we ask in “Upload”?

Page 83: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

27

This sense of surprise about ‘what the tech sector is’ and their

assumptions about it, was highlighted again when members of

the team were surprised to learn that 2018 Tech Nation report

states that jobs involving digital tech skills command on average

£42,578, which is comparable to £32,477 for those which do not.

This gap in understanding played into conversations during

phase 1, whereby young people talked about not feeling that

they could acquire all of the skills sets needed to apply for tech

jobs, and employers telling us that having hard ‘tech skills’ are

not the most important thing about working in tech.

For this reason, ideas and thoughts centred on ‘communication’

or ‘industry involvement’ ranked highly among issues considered

High Impact and High Priority amongst the group. In this

context ‘industry involvement’ serves as a vehicle for better

communication around things like career pathways and training

opportunities.

Having information on careers and training is vital to young

people and this was identified by both the project team

and employers during ‘Download’ conversations, and it was

highlighted as a central theme for investigation during the public

consultation during phase 3.

Having more industry involvement was also important because

of the sector’s role in providing better “representation and

relatability”, which was the (along with ‘industry involvement’)

the issue seen as being of the highest importance, and having

the highest impact when trying to improve stats around female

workers make up only 17% if the digital workforce in Birmingham

(lower than the national average; 19% female tech workforce).

Industry involvement was also discussed as a way of combating

the ‘boring’ learning environment that all stakeholders talked

about passionately during phase 1. The project team commented

that “professionals visiting schools’ and ‘reaching out to young

people, maybe even in primary schools’ was an important idea

to take forwards, and made it a high priority issue for that.

Some of the proposed public consultation questions which

emerged from this phase shine a further light on what the group

felt was important. A fuller list of the questions proposed during

the session is available in the appendix document accompanying

this report

Page 84: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

28

Do you think tech is accessible to you?

To what extent do you feel that tech sector careers are accessible to you?

How would you want industry experts to approach you with opportunities?

How would you want more exposure to tech?

Do you have opportunities to interact with the tech industry?

How do you get involved in the tech sector as a student?

Who do you speak to to find out more about roles available and what they are?

These questions are all designed to build a case for the idea that

‘the industry’ needs to be brought closer to young people, and

also provides space for young people to say how they want that

relationship to work. Questions about accessibility speak to that

apprehension about whether or not spaces are really ‘for young

people’, particularly those already minoritised by other things.

Ideas the group decided were of the highest priority and the

questioned they outlined to accompany them were used to build

the research questions for phase 3; ‘Investigate’.

Page 85: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

29

Looking at Phase 3 _ Investigate

Better representation means deeper connections with people

who work in tech.

• 50% of young people want to work alongside/hear from

people who look like them

• Young people are not interested in just ‘seeing’ themselves

in marketing, it was the 3rd most popular response out of 4

questions)

Young people want and need autonomy and control over

what they learn, how they learn it, and how they talk about

that learning journey.

• 35% want more hands-on tech projects in schools

• 33% want to spend more time with those working in tech

• 34% want more tools to talk about their career choices with

their families

Tech can be made more exciting through more real life,

tangible experience.

• 66% think more hands-on or real-life examples of tech to

work on would make learning environments more exciting.

Phase 3 centred on a public consultation. Our research team

toured a data capture installation called “Root of the Problem”

around colleges in Birmingham to ask young people questions

their thoughts on the tech sector in the city. The questions

asked here were built in collaboration with the project team

and employers during phase two.

Early on in the design process, the Doink team formed a

partnership with Birmingham based artist Lilly Wales. Lilly is a

mixed medium artist who has recently expanded her practice

to include tech, having recently trained herself to code with

the school of code.

“From various conversations, it appears that schools seem to

Key Learnings _

Building ‘Root Of the Problem’

Page 86: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

30

Lilly’s approach:

“When Doink approached me to create a data tree, I wanted to give the build an industrial aesthetic to suit the history of Birmingham, as well as retain the complexities of a system of branches in a tree.”

Lily Wales, Mixed Media Artist

Page 87: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

31

be adding code to the curriculum without giving teachers the

necessary training and awareness of the industry. This limited

information makes it difficult for students to see the value of IT

as a subject and for those that do, it gives them little inspiration

to carry on, unaware of the vast variety of careers out there

waiting for them.”

Early conversations amongst the project team, Lilly, and the

research team established a couple of key ‘things to avoid’

when building a motif for the installation.

This project seeks to understand what barriers exist that stop

young people engaging with tech, therefore the motif for the

installation should not centre on ‘tech’, but be something else

completely.

This project was particularly interested to understand the

experiences of young women and people of colour, meaning

special consideration had to be given to ensure any motif

created was accessible to those groups in an authentic way

The tech sector in Birmingham is ‘growing’, that means the

availability of opportunities is ‘growing’ too, how could a motif

show this growth?

There is a network of stakeholders, interests, and external

factors shaping the choices young people make, how could a

motif demonstrate this network of cause and effect?

The project team highlighted gaps in knowledge and

communication as being reasons young people aren’t

represented in tech industries. How might that affect the motif?

This need for a motif that was explicitly ‘not tech’ coupled

with a desire to demonstrate growth and explore gaps in

communication lead the team to an idea centred around

a ‘tree of knowledge’ or a ‘tree of life’ with different branches

representing different factors and decision makers involved

in supporting the young people of the city. The growth of

branches eloquently the growth of the sector, with the ‘1001

Trades’ of the West Midlands bearing ‘fruits of our labours’.

However, something was not quite right, if this project aims to

support the growth of industry in Birmingham, as a seat of the

4th industrial revolution. Then we are still nurturing our tree, not

harvesting its fruits. It became clear this project does not seek

to produce fruits but in fact seeks to address “the root of the

problem’, whether that be a lack of representation, or a need to

empower young people through better information.

First thoughts:

Thoughts on language:

Identifying a motif:

Page 88: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

32

The motif, ‘Root of the Problem’:

The ‘Root of the Problem’ is an invitation for young people to engage with difficult questions around the barriers to access they face when beginning their careers. Engaging with these questions nourishes the roots of the tree, helping to grow the branches, pushing them through the steel form encompassing Birmingham’s industrial past, and forcing them out, shining a light on their thoughts, feelings and experiences, and helping to prepare it to bear fruits for generations to come.

Page 89: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

33

Participants were invited to answer the four questions posed

throughout the installation by placing illuminated ‘seeds’ into

transparent tree branches corresponding to various available

responses to those questions.

A member of the Doink team accompanied them as they walked

through the installation, this provided space for participants to

talk through their responses, and to provide context to their

thoughts. The team member was able to record all of their

responses and they are available in a separate appendix

document to this report.

The questions for this public engagement were built during

phase three, and responses to these closed questions were

built by reviewing the overlaps and points of departure during

conversations between the project team, and between the

project team and GBSLEP/Employers.

What does better representation look like?

What could help families to better understand tech?

What could make tech learning environments more exciting?

What could improve the advice you get?

We were able to engage 125 young people in conversations

about barriers to access and discussions about how we can

remove those barriers. Early on during the development of this

project, we identified that young women, and young women

of colour in particular, were underrepresented in the tech

workforce of the city. With this in mind, it was decided that Root

of the Problem would be toured around colleges, engaging

young people in education and training, who were thinking

about their futures and what career paths they might choose;

these are the young people who could potentially fill the gaps

in the skills agenda highlighted by GBSLEP in ten years time.

The geography of the city meant that the colleges chosen also

had high numbers of students from minoritised communities,

which ensured that we were engaging those identified under-

represented groups in conversations about obstacles they face.

How did it work?

What did we ask?

Who did we speak to?

Page 90: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

34

Venues for Root of the Problem _

1 _ South and City College, Birmingham

2 _ Millennium Point, Birmingham

3 _ Birmingham Metropolitan College, Birmingham

4 _ Bournville College, Birmingham

city centre 1

2

3

4

Page 91: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

35

Ma

le

(incl

udin

g W

TM t

rans

)

Wo

ma

n (in

clud

ing

MTF

tra

ns)

Pref

er n

ot

to s

ay

66.4%

32.8%

0.8%

Gender:

Ethnicity:

Sout

h A

sia

n (In

dia

n Pa

kist

ani

Ba

ngla

des

hi O

ther

So

uth

Asi

an

Asi

an

Brit

ish)

Whi

te B

ritis

h (E

nglis

h Iri

sh S

cott

ish

Wel

sh O

ther

Brit

ish)

Bla

ck A

fric

an

(incl

udin

g B

lack

Brit

ish)

Oth

er W

hite

Ba

ckg

roun

d (in

clud

ing

Eur

op

ean)

Rath

er n

ot s

ay

Oth

er M

ixed

Bla

ck C

arib

bea

n (in

clud

ing

Bla

ck B

ritis

h)

Oth

er A

sia

n (in

clud

ing

Chi

nese

Asi

an

Brit

ish)

Ara

b

Whi

te a

nd B

lack

Afr

ica

n/ W

hite

and

Bla

ck C

arib

bea

n

Whi

te a

nd S

outh

Asi

an/

Whi

te a

nd O

ther

Asi

an

37.6%

18.4%

14.4%

3.2%0.8%

4%

9.6%8%

2.4%0.8% 0.8%

Page 92: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

36

Age:

Does your course involve learning tech:

16-1

8

Ove

r 25

Und

er 16

19-2

5

19.2%

68%

10.4%

2.4%

32.8%

YES

NO

67.2%

Page 93: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

37

Q2 _ What could help families to better understand tech?

Q1 _ What does better representation look like?

Wo

rkin

g a

long

sid

e p

eop

le

like

me

who

wo

rk in

tec

h

Seei

ng p

eop

le li

ke m

e in

m

ark

etin

g a

nd c

om

ms

Seei

ng m

ore

da

ta o

n d

iver

sity

in

tec

h co

mp

ani

es

Hea

ring

fro

m p

eop

le li

ke m

e w

ho w

ork

in t

ech

Ha

ving

mo

re o

f a s

ay

in

dec

isio

n m

aki

ng

12%

30.4%

16.8%19.2% 21.6%

Mo

re t

oo

ls fo

r yo

ung

peo

ple

to

exp

lain

the

ir ca

reer

cho

ices

to

fam

ilies

Mo

re in

fo a

vaila

ble

for p

are

nts

Mo

re o

pp

ort

uniti

es fo

r pa

rent

s to

co

nnec

t w

ith t

each

ers

Mo

re o

pp

ort

uniti

es fo

r pa

rent

s to

co

nnec

t w

ith t

ech

emp

loye

rs

16%

34.4%

28%

21.6%

Page 94: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

38

Q3 _ What could improve the advice you get?

Q4 _ What could make a tech learning environment more exciting?

Mo

re h

and

s-o

n p

roje

cts

Mo

re g

uest

s in

the

cla

ssro

om

Bet

ter i

nfo

rmed

cla

ssro

om

tea

cher

s

Mo

re re

al-

life

exa

mp

les

of t

ech

Mo

re c

hanc

es t

o u

se t

ech

out

sid

e of

IT

less

ons

35.2%

12%10.4%

24.8%

15.2%

Tea

cher

s un

der

sta

ndin

g t

ech

care

ers

bet

ter

Bet

ter i

nfo

rma

tion

pla

tfo

rms

Bet

ter i

nfo

rmed

fam

ily

Mo

re s

ignp

ost

ing

Mo

re t

ime

with

peo

ple

who

wo

rk in

tec

h

Tea

cher

s sp

ott

ing

ta

lent

s

14.4%11.2%

7.2%

33.6%

15.2%18.4%

Page 95: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

39

We were able to engage young people from all over the city

with ‘Root of the Problem’. participants coming from 46 of

the 78 existent Birmingham or ‘B’ postcodes, this represents

59% of postcodes in the city, In addition to this, we had

respondents from Coventry, Dudley, and Walsall. A more

detailed table of postcodes can be found in the appendix

document accompanying this report.

This was asked as an open question, and are reflected on

in the next section. A longer list of responses and quotes

for this question are available in the appendix document

accompanying this report.

This phase of the project is a brilliant opportunity to test

ideas and assumptions that arise earlier during earlier

phases of the project.

Young people in the project team employers we spoke to

talked about a need for real and ‘authentic’ engagement

between young people and tech sector employers in order

to help young people, especially those from ethnically

minoritised backgrounds, to feel welcomed and valued in

tech sector spaces.

This rings true, with about half of respondents telling us that

better representation means ‘working alongside someone

who looks like me’ (30%), and ‘hearing from someone who

looks like me” (21%). This is in contrast to only 16% of young

people saying that seeing people who look like them in

marketing and comms is important. Young people are savvy

to those empty gestures of inclusivity and are calling for real

engagement, as someone put it in the download session “it’s

not as simple as putting a black woman on the cover”. The

need to connect with employers was also reflected in the

33% of respondents who told us that ‘more time spent with

people who work in tech’ could improve the advice they get

about tech careers.

Only 12% of those questioned said they’d like to have more

of a say in decision-making processes, however the 34%

who told us they wanted more tools to explain their career

choices at home, or the 35% who wanted to see more hands-

on projects in the classroom, are indicative of the fact that

Postcodes:

Q5 _ Why aren’t young people attracted to tech jobs in Birmingham?

What did we hear in “Investigate”?

Page 96: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

40

young people want and need autonomy and control over

what they learn, how they learn it, and how they talk about

that learning journey.

The issue of ‘being able to explain career choices at home’ was

a large one, especially for those from South Asian communities.

Comments here reflected the comments from the project team

during the Download and Upload sessions, with young people

telling us that “[their] families don’t value it like other things..

being a doctor or something like that”.

It was surprising that only 12% of respondents thought ‘hearing

from more guests in the classroom’ could make them more

exciting places; as we’ve explored elsewhere in this report,

maybe just ‘hearing’ from them isn’t enough? The desire for

more hands-on projects (35%) can be crossed with the desire

for more ‘real-life examples’ (24%) to show how young people

feel that training environments could be made more exciting

by bringing more tangible, useful, projects into the classroom.

Could employers help to resource this whilst at the same time

forging deeper, more meaningful relationships with young

people in the city?

In doing so they could also play a part in dispelling the myths

that tech is ‘boring’? 67% of the young people we spoke to

were already on courses utilizing tech in some way, even

though they were doing tech courses a significant amount of

them suggested that tech was seen as ‘boring’ or ‘nerdy’ or

‘geeky’. Some of those respondents were keen to communicate

that ‘tech is misunderstood!” and that ‘the media portrays it as

boring’. They went on to tell us about how ‘people don’t know

that you get to play with robots” or that people “don’t think

about graphic design and all that other cool stuff”.

Some respondents talked about not understanding what the

‘end goals’ of tech employment were, with many of them able

to talk enthusiastically about the possibility of working for big

firms like Google or Apple, but not able to talk through what a

job role in these settings might look like. This fact is reflected in

the 18% of respondents who wanted ‘better informed teachers’

to help them to understand the scope of what is available to

them. It was interesting to note that if our facilitation team

suggested a working for a smaller tech firm who might be

Birmingham based, enthusiasm quickly waned. The ‘prestige’

factor of companies evidently plays a factor in this decision-

making process also.

The gap between those ‘prestige’ organisations and ‘other’

organisations also played into young people’s understanding

of what their earning expectations could be in the sector. One

young man told us that “[tech sector employees] don’t get

good money’ and others talked about how ‘you won’t make

money like Mark Zuckerberg’. Zuckerberg is the 5th richest

man in the world, so may well be true, but the point the young

man, and others, made related to a perceived lack of return

Page 97: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

41

on investment of time and skill, that outside of huge multi-

nationals, people working for tech companies don’t stand to

earn very much.

The investment of time in skills development also presented

an additional barrier unto itself. The idea that tech ‘takes too

long to learn to a good standard’ was prevalent and is at

odds with discussions with employers during the Download

sessions whereby employers told us that technical skill was

not as important as problem-solving, or creative thinking.

There is an opportunity here for GBSLEP to help facilitate

discussion between young people and employers to bridge this

communication gap.

In addition to tech training being perceived as “long,

complicated, and difficult” , students for whom English was not

their first language spoke about concerns that the language

used in the tech industry was too complicated and constituted

having to learn a whole new language, in addition to English,

which was off-putting and affected their choices.

Page 98: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

42

Looking at Phase 4 _Innovate

1. Engaging with employers is key to addressing several

issues highlighted by young people:

• Bridging gaps in young people’s understanding of the

tech sector

• Helping classrooms become more exciting spaces to

learn about tech

• Demonstrating the value of cross-discipline working

• Incentivising young people to train in tech

• Providing relatable role models

2. It is crucial to empower young people through better

access to information

3. Informing parents is important, but spaces created for that

need to be mediated by young people; they need to be

involved in all conversations involving their own futures.

This final phase brought together the project group, GBSLEP,

and some employers to review all of the data collected through

conversation and consultation and use that data to begin

innovating new ideas and solutions to the issues identified by

GBSLEP and by the project team.

First of all, participants were encouraged to review quotes from

the download sessions, some data exploring the wider tech

sector, and the data collected through ‘Root of the Problem’

and ask themselves:

What trends have you spotted?

What challenges do you see?

What opportunities are there?

Are there anomalies or surprises?

Using the responses to these questions, participants built

‘challenges’ for GBSLEP and the wider sector using ‘how might

we…’ statements. The group then worked together to suggest

responses to these challenges, these responses offered some

practical solutions and ideas for strands of work, but also shone

a light on themes for consideration when building GBSLEP’s

delivery plan.

Key Learnings from this phase

What did we ask?

Page 99: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

43

The final questions in this phase explored two key points:

What resources do we need to

activate these ideas?

Who is best placed to resource

these ideas?

The innovate session provided a final opportunity for the project

team, GBSLEP, and employers to review the data from our early

conversations and the wider research. This session introduced

the data from the public consultation during ‘Investigate”.

The group took a lot of positives from the data, quickly

seeing that the “opportunity for employers to engage more”

was an exciting one. The importance of employer or industry

engagement to the success of this is reflected in the fact that all

but three of the possible ‘solutions’ the project team developed.

The ‘employers’ or “sector experts’ were key to resourcing ideas

around several themes:

Improving communication and there for bridging gaps in

understanding, which was a major point of departure between

young people and employers identified early on in this project.

Engagement here was seen to entail establishing networking

events, or the presence of ‘tech ambassadors’ in schools. This

feeds into the desire that young people have to be better

informed through better relationships, a factor which is reflected

in the 33% of respondents to Root of the Problem who felt that

‘more time spent working with people in tech’ would improve

careers advice.

The other key theme was around the capacity for employers

or industry experts to help make classrooms more exciting.

The group felt that bringing technologists into the classroom

would respond to the needs of the almost 60% of respondents

who felt that there need for ‘more hands-on’ and ‘real life’

examples of tech to work on in the classroom. The idea of tech

companies providing ‘incentivised challenges’ was suggested

by more than one group, with some groups suggesting that

initial incentives could be none-tech related (vouchers, tickets

to events etc) to entice young people to get involved even if

they aren’t necessarily interested in the tech itself to begin with.

In response to this suggestion, one employer reflected on a

programme run by BMW whereby young people were given

time to develop an idea for a tech project and present it

back to [BMW] - the winner then would receive funding to

bring the idea to life with the help of BMWs expertise. This was

well received, but questions were raised about who connects

What did we hear in “Innovate”?

Page 100: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

44

with these opportunities, and a wariness that this doesn’t just

engage ‘’the usual suspects’.

The presence of industry professionals in the classroom could

also provide real role models for young people who are looking

to see people ‘who look like them’ and not just in marketing

and communications, but in tangible roles that they could see

themselves working in. This has to go further than ‘guests in

the classroom’ which only 12% of respondents felt would make

classrooms more exciting or accessible, instead, this is about

sustained partnerships, with the tech sector being challenged

to “invest” in young people by several groups during discussions.

Many responses here made reference to investments by way

of cash or physical resource (laptops etc). This was in response

to obstacles the group identified early on regarding access to

tech, however, it is important to temper that with employers

being adamant that ‘having loads of top of the range tech is

not important’. If it’s not important, but young people still think

it is, then this must come back to a question of communication

and strengthens the case for employers to connect with young

people to help dispel their misconceptions.

Inviting industry professionals into classrooms other than ICT

classrooms was suggested as a way of helping to demonstrate

the idea that tech doesn’t exist in a silo, and that “if a young

person is really excited for geography, then get them excited for

geotech, whatever that is!”. Showing tech in other contexts like

this would be an invaluable ‘way to bring projects to life’. Ideas

here also reflected on young people’s concerns about ways to

‘upskill’ themselves, especially in light of young people feeling

that learning tech was time-consuming, expensive or both.

A possible response to those perceived barriers was ‘modular

learning’. One young person described it as the fact that

“you might not be interested in tech as a whole but might be

interested to see how tech can enhance your current subject

e.g art, mechanic course etc. This would help to challenge the

perception that tech is for a specific type of person and open it

up to sectors that wouldn’t necessarily by seen as a tech path”

This flexible approach to tech is an exciting opportunity for

GBSLEP to work with training providers to help people improve

their skills within contexts

A need for spaces to young people to connect with employers

better also manifested itself in suggestions for events. “The Big

Real’ was a suggestion centred around producing a youth-

lead which brought together employers and young people

around things other than tech, such as arts events (poetry

or music events were mentioned here). This opportunity to

connect around something other than discussions about work

is an interesting idea and should be explored further by GBSLEP

when planning their delivery plan.

These events were also seen as possible solutions to the

need to find ‘alternative routes to recruitment’. This need was

Page 101: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

45

highlighted off of the back of young people and employers

lamenting that “recruitment processes don’t work”. In earlier

sessions an employer shared a story about not having anyone

from the targeted demographic applying for a given job, and

young people talked about ‘feeling like you send out 1 million

CVs and never hear back” Could GBSLEP facilitate informal

spaces, in schools or in youth centres whereby young people

and employers could informally ‘interview’ each other with

an aim to secure internships, work experiences or ideally

employment opportunities?

Outside of resourcing new ideas but in a similar thread, the

group gave consideration to language, specifically the use

of the word ‘tech’ and how it creates a binary between ‘tech’

and ‘non-tech’ jobs and people. The very first point in the first

session established that ‘tech’ will encompass all jobs in the

near future, and language needs to reflect that. Peter Cripps

of IBM posited that they bring specialists in from other fields to

help solve tech problems, such as those with business acumen,

or lawyers for example. Could this demonstration of cross-

discipline teams work in a classroom setting, and could it help

to convey the value and importance of collaborative problem

solving that employers were so passionate about during

Download conversations?

As discussed previously, the group suggested ideas and

solutions focused on increasing young people’s access to

information. This desire to be empowered to make choices

through knowledge played out in the desire for ‘more tools to

speak to their parents’ identifying during phase 3, and it plays

out again here. Several ideas generated here touched on

bringing employers and parents together, but crucially young

people have to be a part of this process, and they should be

empowered to mediate these spaces. These spaces ‘cannot

have the feel of parents’ evenings where young people are

talked over, even in their own best interest’

Page 102: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 9

15/04/2019 1 of 1

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

5G Infrastructure Project – Public Report

Purpose

1. This Board report provides the LEP Board with an update against progress by the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) in delivery of the 5G Infrastructure project.

Reasons for Exemption 2. In accordance with GBSLEP’s scheme of publication, this paper is exempted from

publication as though the LEP were subject to the provisions set out in Section 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, paragraph 3, as the paper contains

Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information)

3. The information relates to ongoing development work by the WMCA as part of the 5G infrastructure project.

4. An accompanying private paper has therefore been prepared and has been circulated to the LEP Board.

Report by: Paul Edwards Head of Strategy

Contact: [email protected] 07712 436969

Date Created: 15 April 2019

Page 103: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 10 A

15/04/2019 1 of 2

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

Foreign Direct Investment Update

Recommendations 1. The Board is asked to note:

the interim FDI results for 18/19 and the current macro-economic

challenges which are impacting the attraction of businesses to the GBS LEP area;

the impact of reduced funding for the West Midlands Growth Company (WMGC) to focus on the GBS LEP area, in relation to business attraction.

Background 2018/19 Context 2. The Brexit referendum continued to have a significant impact on FDI across

the UK including the GBSLEP area. Final DIT figures will be available in the summer but it is anticipated that across the Midlands Engine area and nationally, numbers of projects and jobs will be substantially down.

3. WMGC is in the final year of an ERDF funded programme, Investing in Greater Birmingham, aimed at attracting SMEs to the GBS LEP area. This programme has been severely impacted by the uncertainty created by the Brexit referendum, with many SMEs putting expansion plans on hold until clarity has been achieved nationally. For those projects that did land, these had far smaller job numbers as expected from an SME.

4. The automotive sector continued to slow last year which will impact strongly on regional figures. There was a strong landing in Solihull, IAC, due in part to funding received via Finance Birmingham. It is anticipated that regional investment in connected and autonomous vehicles and battery technologies, will help create the right environment for future projects and supply chain opportunities linked to these new technologies.

5. Despite the challenging macro-economic conditions, the GBS LEP area does

have key developments which are aiding the continued attraction of investment into the region:

The rail sector has benefitted strongly from HS2 and its associated

contracts, as well as the announcements around UKRRIN, and the research and development strengths of the University of Birmingham

The announcement of the three city 5G testbed has stimulated interest amongst technology companies and has helped support the continued growth of the Fintech sector within the area.

Page 104: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 10 A

15/04/2019 2 of 2

The continued growth of the BPFS sector has created a cluster density and depth which is supporting the attraction of further companies into the region.

6. In the past three years, the funding and hence capacity for Birmingham focussed business attraction has decreased and will cease from April 2019. Furthermore, the majority of the available funding has been targeted towards the attraction of SMEs

2018/19 – Interim Results, based on WMGC activity only 7. The 2018/19 results are interim results and are considered private until they

have been audited. Once the figures have been confirmed they will be published. It is expected that they will be available in the public domain by summer 2019.

Future pipeline 8. For f.y. 19/20 onwards, the majority of business attraction focus for WMGC

will cover the wider WMCA region. There has been agreement from the Regeneration Directors of the WMCA area that WMGC can continue to handle DIT GBS LEP enquiries for Birmingham.

9. There will continue to be tailored GBS LEP activity from the Solihull team, as well as a small sector sales team funded by the GBS LEP Enterprise Zone, focusing on BPFS and Tech sectors.

10. It should be noted that of the 682 prospects for WMGC, 495 are aligned to the

GBS LEP geography, as are 247 out of 251 of the projects being qualified. 11. The top five sectors for GBS LEP prospects going forward are automotive

(95), tech and creative (76), advanced engineering (63), life sciences (48) and BPFS (44).

 Conclusion 12. This report outlines the interim end of year performance for f.y. 18/19, which

was affected by the challenging macro-economic conditions. End of year results are expected to be lower than last year.

13. Reduced levels of funding and capacity dedicated to the GBS LEP area are

impacting on the volume of jobs and projects delivered by WMGC. 14. However, ongoing opportunities from HS2, 5G and other UK market-specific

opportunities where the GBS LEP area has a compelling proposition should put the region in a competitive position for the foreseeable future.

Prepared by: Nicola Hewitt, Commercial Director, West Midlands Growth Company 0121 020205051 / [email protected]

Date Created: 08/04/19

Page 105: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 10.B.

15/04/2019 1 of 2

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

West Midlands Growth Company Investment Strategy

Recommendations 1. The Board is asked to note the regional investment strategy, approved by the

West Midlands Growth Company (WMGC) Board, which will frame the business attraction work by WMGC for the next three years.

Context 2. The strategy has been developed over the past 4-8 months based on third party

research carried out by IBM PLI in 2017, Nigel Driffield from University of Warwick and market insight from a range of other partners as well as the WMGC Business Attraction team. A range of different stakeholders were consulted during the strategy development including the LIS LEP working group, the Black Country Regeneration Directors, Birmingham City Council, Wolverhampton City Council, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council and Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council.

3. It outlines a regional approach to business attraction that will be led by WMGC,

in collaboration with local partners, central government and other third party intermediaries.

4. It outlines which sectors will be promoted in the short, medium and longer term

and how these sectors tie in to the four strategic market opportunities outlined by the LIS.

5. The document contains a draft international activity plan and proposed WMCA

SLA outputs to be agreed by stakeholders and university partners. 6. The document acknowledges that WMGC will need to transition away from a

Birmingham centric investment pipeline to generation of a WMCA wide investment pipeline.

Conclusion 7. The business attraction strategy outlines how WMGC will build a regional

investment pipeline and narrative aimed at increasing both the volume and value of foreign and UK owned companies’ investment in the region. The attraction and expansion of end occupiers will be a key element to the successful delivery of the aims of the LIS; delivery of inclusive growth, raising productivity, developing an innovation led economy with globally competitive industry.

Page 106: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 10.B.

15/04/2019 2 of 2

Report by: Nicola Hewitt Commercial Director, West Midlands Growth Company Contact: [email protected] Date Created: 05/04/2019

Appendices a. West Midlands Inward Investment Strategy

Please note that Appendix a. refers to other appendices; these are not included along with the GBSLEP Board papers, but are available upon request.

Page 107: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

1 | P a g e

Page 108: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

2 | P a g e

West Midlands Inward Investment Strategy

Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 3

SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 4

CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................... 5

REGIONAL FDI PERFORMANCE....................................................................................................................... 5

TABLE1: JOBS CREATED BY FDI INTO THE UK, BY DESTINATION (2007-2017) ........................................ 5

TABLE 2: AVERAGE JOB VALUE OF FDI INTO THE UK BY DESTINATION REGION (2012-17) ................. 6

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES .................................................................................................................................... 7

WMCA’S VALUE PROPOSITION ................................................................................................... 8

WHY THE UK? .................................................................................................................................................... 8

WHY THE WEST MIDLANDS?........................................................................................................................... 8

INCREASING INWARD INVESTMENT ....................................................................................... 10

SECTOR CLASSIFICATION ............................................................................................................................... 10

TABLE 3: SECTOR PRIORITISATION FOR INVESTMENT PROMOTION ACTIVITIES ...................................... 10

TABLE 4: ALIGNMENT OF BUSINESS ATTRACTION SECTORS WITH LIS MARKET OPPORTUNITIES .. 11

SUPPORTING BUSINESS EXPANSIONS ......................................................................................................... 12

BUILDING AN INVESTMENT PIPELINE FOR THE REGION ............................................................................ 12

TABLE 5: SECTOR PRIORITISATION BY LEP ......................................................................................................... 12

OVERALL AMBITION ......................................................................................................................................... 14

INVESTMENT PROCESS, WORKING COLLABORATIVELY ACROSS THE REGION .................................... 15

GLOBAL TARGET MARKETS ........................................................................................................................... 15

TABLE 7: JOBS CREATED BY FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN THE WEST MIDLANDS, BY ORIGIN COUNTRY

(2007-2017) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15

TABLE 8: TARGET COUNTRY PROFILE..................................................................................................................... 16

DELIVERING REGIONAL BUSINESS ATTRACTION ...................................................... 17

ROLE OF THE WMGC ..................................................................................................................................... 17

COLLABORATION AND PARTNERSHIPS ....................................................................................................... 17

TACTICS TO DELIVER REGIONAL BUSINESS ATTRACTION ....................................................................... 18

OUTPUTS ............................................................................................................................................................ 19

FORECASTS FOR 2019-2020 AND THE 2019-2022 PERIOD FOR WMCA CONTRACT .............................. 20

BREAKDOWN BETWEEN NEW INVESTMENTS AND EXPANSIONS ..................................................................... 22

Page 109: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

3 | P a g e

Executive Summary

This strategy sets out how a regional approach to business attraction, focused on Local Industrial Strategy (LIS) priorities, can add value to local initiatives. It provides a roadmap for interventions led by the West Midlands Growth Company as well as setting out the actions required by other partners and stakeholders. It will form part of wider, regional work focused on Place Marketing, Capital Attraction and regional Tourism Promotion.

The objective of this business attraction strategy is to recommend ways in which the region can increase investment from both foreign and UK owned companies. It will deliver increased levels of investment across the whole region, targeting a balance of sectors that will deliver both job volume and job value, thereby supporting the ambition to deliver inclusive growth across the WMCA. The plan recommends a programme of pro-active promotion, re-active marketing and internationalisation for a range of key sectors, targeting core international markets. There will be a digital subsector running through the majority of these areas of activity, as digital disruption is likely to affect most industries. For each sector, an agreed value proposition will be developed, based on the regional branding narrative and the LIS evidence pack. The sectors to be promoted pro-actively are:

- Transport equipment and advanced manufacturing – automotive, rail, aerospace

- Business and professional services – multifunctional, high value, serving private and public sector

- Food technology – machinery and equipment, manufacturing and testing - Gaming – to include serious games, AR/VR applications linked to advanced

manufacturing and engineering industry - Energy storage – R&D and manufacturing - FinTech - Med tech – high tech medical devices R&D and manufacture, including

diagnostics and testing

The sectors to be re-actively marketed in the short term are: - Industrial Internet of Things – linked predominantly to manufacturing/big data - Materials – R&D and production

The WMGC will work in partnership with private sector companies, the region’s leading Universities, the Department of International Trade, the Midlands Engine and other local, national and international intermediaries. A draft international activity plan has been attached as appendix 4 to illustrate the types of work which can be delivered under this strategy.

Attracting end occupiers will bring businesses, jobs and investment to the West Midlands. These will be key measures of our success. A draft outcomes document linked to the WMGC contract with the WMCA has been included to illustrate proposed outcomes for this strategy.

Page 110: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

4 | P a g e

Scope and Methodology

The objective of this Business Attraction Strategy (BAS) is to recommend ways in which the WMGC can build a regional investment pipeline and narrative aimed at increasing both the volume and value of foreign and UK owned companies’ investment in the region. The attraction and expansion of end occupiers will be a key element to the successful delivery of the aims of the LIS; delivery of inclusive growth, raising productivity, developing an innovation led economy with globally competitive industry.

The end recommendations draw from an independent piece of research conducted for

WMGC by IBM Plant Location International. This looked at the strongest future

sectors for foreign direct investment, from an investor’s point of view. This work fed

into the regional sector working groups of the LIS and formed part of the work to

identify four strategic market opportunities for the region. A further piece of research

is currently being undertaken to examine the highest potential UK sectors and regions

for expansions into the WMCA area. This work will be completed by Summer 2019

and will augment the international action plan indicated in appendix 4.

The IBM research examined global historical foreign direct investment trends into the

region, as well an analysis of local investment data, local regional plans and

audits. This desk-based research was then augmented by sector and regional

workshops and analysis of current literature on trends shaping the future of corporate

investment behaviours. By combining this horizon scanning and historical analysis, a

recommendation was made on specific cluster strengths and opportunities which can

be used to stimulate inward investment into the region going forward. These

recommendations fed into the LIS work to produce four key strategic market

opportunities which encompass existing cluster strengths as well as the FDI sectors

of the future. (Appendix 1). The internationalisation and business attraction success

of these future market opportunities will be driven in some measure by the speed at

which LEPs and Local Authorities implement the cluster development plans for each

of the market opportunities. Attracting future businesses to the region will need a

collaborative effort between WMGC, LA investment teams, LEPs, WMCA and other

regional stakeholders.

This document will be circulated in draft form in spring 2019. It will drive and inform

the action plan of the WMGC. The company business attraction action plan will then

be agreed in consultation with each of the WMCA Local Authorities and the WMCA

itself. The effectiveness of the internationalisation programme to attract new FDI

sectors in the future will depend on the local cluster development of each regional

market opportunity.

Page 111: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

5 | P a g e

Context

Regional FDI performance The region has had a successful recent track record in attracting investment. In the

past decade the West Midlands attracted 14% of the FDI related jobs into the UK, and

has been the second highest performing region in the country.1 (Table 1)

Table1: Jobs created by FDI into the UK, by destination (2007-2017)

This strong regional performance was delivered against key sectors, reflecting the

advanced manufacturing heritage of the region.

1 Source IBM-PLI GLT database, 2017

Page 112: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

6 | P a g e

Based on the above sector breakdown, the strong volume-based performance for FDI

is not mirrored by job value of investment received. By this measure, the West

Midlands has performed below the national average with regard to the job value of the

investment received.2 (Table 2)

Table 2: Average job value of FDI into the UK by destination region (2012-17)

2 Source IBM-PLI GLT database, 2017

5.55 UK average

Page 113: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

7 | P a g e

It has been evidenced academically that whilst inward investment is associated with

technology transfer from the home country, leading to innovation and productivity

growth, and also with employment creation, with few exceptions an individual sector

will generate one or the other3. This premise was recently verified in relation to the

West Midlands region and it was concluded that as a region, inward investment has

been successful at generating employment in low value-added activities or a small

number of jobs in high value add sectors4. A future Business Attraction Plan therefore

needs to balance the need to create an increased volume of jobs as well as a higher

proportion of higher value jobs to help support the aims of the LIS in raising

productivity. The BAS will outline how to achieve increased levels of investment such

that it achieves:

I. Results across all three areas of the WMCA supported by the Growth Company; Birmingham and Solihull, Coventry and Warwickshire and Black Country Local Enterprise Partnerships

II. A balanced approach to cover both job creating sectors as well as high value/high productivity sectors

III. A strategy to internationalise the four future market opportunities for the region, thereby helping to support the growth of future regional cluster which should create the appropriate conditions for financial investment and future FDI sectors

Future perspectives It is anticipated that industry is facing some fundamental changes over the next 5 to

15 years. World manufacturing footprints are changing with the creation of more

complex global value chains and the Internet of Things will have long-lasting,

substantive effects on the way manufacturing operates and supply chains are

developed. Globally, new technologies are dramatically re-shaping IT services with

new start-ups and SMEs creating IP solutions that are able to challenge established

ICT players. With regard to science and R&D systems, companies are increasingly

looking to more open innovation systems. Politically, the growth in economic power

of China and India, as well as the uncertainty over US/China relations and the slowing

down of the Chinese economy will undoubtedly effect industrial behaviours globally.

The LIS outlines how the region can grow and develop during this changing

technological and political environment and has identified four key market

opportunities for the region; both to grow our existing cluster strengths and to develop

new industrial strengths for the future. A synopsis of this strategy is included as

Appendix 1.

Our future BAS will therefore need to be cognisant of this changing industrial

environment and seek to maximise new market opportunities which may be delivered

3 Source Nigel Driffield paper 4 Source Nigel Driffield paper

Page 114: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

8 | P a g e

by this change and the regional development of 5G testbeds. We will promote sectors

that leverage both an existing capability and track record and internationalise those

that have the potential to evolve and adapt to the future industrial landscape so that

we are able to attract investment over the short, medium and long-term.

At the time of writing, the outcomes of the Brexit referendum are very unclear. The

effectiveness of all inward investment activity will be affected by the results of the

UK/EU negotiations. The weighting of the work outlined towards the end of the

strategy may alter in light of the events in the build up to March. The fundamental

principles of the business attraction strategy will not alter, as they are based on

detailed regional and independent research and reflect the true market opportunities

for our local economy. The weighting of the tactics may differ depending on outcomes

at the end of March.

WMCA’s Value Proposition

Why the UK? As Britain navigates a global, post-Brexit environment, the UK Government will

continue to promote the nascent strengths of the UK economy. The Department for

International Trade has an extensive programme for trade and investment promotion

which the region will leverage to encourage investment into the country and city region.

The UK’s value proposition is based on:

I. The size and dynamism of the national economy II. Innovation and strength of R&D

III. Strength of the business community and the levels of entrepreneurism nationally

IV. Strength of legal framework and ease of doing business V. Richness of culture and heritage

VI. Language

Why the West Midlands? In order to attract investment to the WMCA, the region will build on these national

strengths and refine them, producing a holistic, integrated proposition; building a

regional ‘voice’ and offer which is appealing and attractive to all levels of investment.

The regional narrative will build on the branding work around Make Your Mark and the

core regional brand pillars below.

Page 115: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

9 | P a g e

The strong economic offer of the region is consistent across all sectors and centres

on:

I. Regional population and talent – young, diverse, digital and multi-national II. 5G – 3 city test bed provides digital connectivity and an environment for the

development of future industrial sectors. III. Connectivity – investment in infrastructure (HS2 and wider programme) and

accessibility to both national and global markets IV. Innovation – strength and breadth of University sector with globally leading

specialisms, augmented by R&D carried out by local businesses V. Strong political leadership – collaboration across local government, the Mayor

and the WMCA to deliver growth, backed by central government VI. Quality of life – affordable, rich local, cultural landscape backed up by high

quality education, with UK City of Culture in Coventry 2021 and the Commonwealth Games in Birmingham 2022, providing landmark opportunities to drive regional profile and awareness even further

VII. Clusters of cutting-edge businesses in core, key sectors.

The WMGC will promote sector value propositions based on this core narrative to key

target markets in order to stimulate inward investment. The sector capabilities will be

developed from the LIS evidence pack and added to this core regional narrative.

These propositions will be developed, agreed and shared with all of the investment

teams across the region by the end of Summer 2019 to provide consistency of

messaging and positioning. They will also be agreed collectively with our university

partners to ensure the value propositions are as compelling as possible.

Page 116: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

10 | P a g e

Increasing Inward Investment

Sector classification Based on the IBM PLI research and its international competitive benchmarking

exercise, the following sectors have been identified for promotion. This prioritisation

(Table 3) was based on benchmarking each sector internationally, assessing its ability

for job creation, job value, levels of international competitiveness and matching current

strengths with those that have potential for the future. It also took into account the

need for a balance of manufacturing and service based sectors. Those rated as

medium to high have been classified as Tier 1 - sectors most likely to generate

investment and jobs in the short-term. Those rated as medium to low have been

classified as Tier 2 - sectors most likely to generate lower investment levels and fewer

numbers of jobs due to the immaturity of the sector.

Table 3: Sector prioritisation for investment promotion activities

To deliver inclusive growth, the ranking ensures there is a balance between those

sectors that can deliver job volume and those sectors that can deliver job value.

Tier 1 sectors to be promoted pro-actively are:

- Transport technologies – automotive, rail, aerospace - Advanced manufacturing – precision component manufacturing - Business and professional services – multifunctional, high value, serving

private and public sector - Food technology – machinery and equipment, manufacturing and testing

Segment Investment

Volume

Job Value Contest-

ability

WMCA's

Qualitative

Offer

WMCA's

Cost Offer

WMCA's

Qualitative

Offer (UK)

WMCA's

Cost Offer

(UK)

Overall

Priority

Back & middle office/RHQ

(multifunctional, high value, serving

private & public sector)

High Medium High Medium MediumHigh-

MediumHigh

High

Hi tech medical devices R&D and

manufactureMedium High High

Medium-

LowMedium Medium Medium

Medium

Games development (Serious plus

other)Medium High High Medium High

High-

MediumHigh

High-

Medium

Food technology (Machinery &

equipment manuf. & testing)Medium Medium Medium High High High Medium

High-

Medium

FintechMedium High Medium Low Medium Medium

High-

Medium Medium

Industrial IoT, (mobility & Manufact)Low High Medium

Medium-

LowMedium Medium High

Medium-

Low

Materials R&D and productionHigh Medium High Medium

Medium-

LowHigh Medium

Medium-

Low

Transport Equipment plus components

manufactureHigh High High High High High Medium

High

Energy stroage R&D and manufactureLow High Medium High High High Medium

Medium

Page 117: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

11 | P a g e

- Gaming – to include serious games, AR/VR applications linked to advanced manufacturing and engineering industry

- Energy storage – R&D and manufacturing - FinTech - Med tech – high tech medical devices R&D and manufacture, including

diagnostics and testing

Tier 2 sectors have the potential to grow into strong investment attractors in the future,

but in the short term are recommended for re-active marketing. These are:

- Industrial Internet of Things – linked predominantly to manufacturing/big data - Materials – R&D and production

All of the above strengths are aligned with the LIS and fit into the regional market

opportunities. Tier 2 sectors are flagged in orange in Table 4

The IBM research noted further capabilities that had the potential to act as attractors

for international investment, but at the time of the exercise, these sectors were still too

immature to be internationally competitive. These Tier 3 sectors were cyber security,

clinical trials, Government Tech and construction technologies. These capabilities

also align with the four market opportunities identified by the LIS and are indicated in

brown in Table 4. Work is being coordinated by each of the LEPs to develop these

transformative sectors identified by the LIS, to support indigenous companies to

expand and to use local innovation strengths to stimulate sector growth.

Table 4: Alignment of business attraction sectors with LIS Market Opportunities

Smart Mobility

•Transport technologies

•Advanced manufacturing to include food technologies

•Energy storage

•Internet of Things and cyber security

•Materials - R&D and production

•Construction technologies

Data Driven Healthcare and Life Sciences

•Medical technologies

•Clinical trials

•Cyber security

Modern Services

•Business and professional services

•Legal

•Insurance

•Banking/Finance

•Property Services

•Shared Services

•Government Bodies

•Fintech

•Cyber security

Creative content, techniques and

technologies

•Gaming

•Serious gaming, to include AR/VR

•Cyber security

5G test beds could potentially benefit development of all market opportunities

Page 118: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

12 | P a g e

Supporting business expansions Historically, 43 % of investment projects delivered by WMGC have stemmed from the expansions of existing companies. In light of the uncertainty around Brexit, supporting our local foreign owned companies to expand and prosper will be increasingly important. In the short term, WMGC will collaborate with local investment teams and LEPs to agree a list of 70 leading firms across the region, that the company will account manage. For larger companies, it is proposed that both a local representative as well as a WMGC representative acting regionally, may need to be involved in key accounts. It will be important to understand the parent structure, levels of engagement with either DIT or other government stakeholders and the corporate decision making process. The WMGC will account manage and work with these firms, who have already invested in the region, to support them and share market insight with the regional economic teams in each local authority area.

Building an investment pipeline for the region The sector prioritisation above has been formulated to ensure that there are

investment attraction sectors across the region. Table 5 below maps each of the

sector strengths across each of the LEP geographies.

Table 5: Sector prioritisation by LEP

Page 119: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

13 | P a g e

As can be seen, the business attraction work will generate investment across all of the

WMCA region by targeting the individual sub sectors outlined above.

Page 120: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

14 | P a g e

Overall ambition Using sector prioritisation, the BAS will consist of a three-pronged approach, aimed at

generating a pipeline of both short and long term investment. The plan will support

the region to develop its core industrial strengths, thereby generating greater numbers

of businesses, jobs and investment. It will consist of investment promotion to

generate an investment pipeline of our existing competitive strengths. This will be

augmented by staggered internationalisation of the four strategic market opportunity

themes outlined by the LIS, thereby stimulating investment to support the growth of

future capabilities. Increased investment resulting from internationalisation activity will

help support the regional growth and the development of local indigenous clusters by

the LEPs and LAs. It is hoped that in turn, a number of these currently immature

capabilities can become FDI targets for the future. The recommended approach

covers the Tiers 1,2, and 3 sectors listed on page 11 and is outlined below. It shows

activity in the short, medium and long terms, whereby short-term is 12-18 months,

medium is 18 months – 3 years and long-term is 3-5 years.

Short Term

Pro-active promotion and support for Tier 1

sectors, reactive support for Tier 2, support expansions of local

companies

Promotion of 5G opportunity, to underpin all market opportunities

outlined by LIS

Internationalisation of Smart Modility and Data

Driven Healthcare themes to support

development of future FDI sectors

Medium Term

Proactive promotion of Tier 1 sectors, reactive support for Tier 2 and

support for local expansions

Tactical promotion of Tier 3 sectors subject to cluster growth by

LEPs/LAs.

Internationalisation of Smart Mobility, Data

Driven Healthcare and Creative services

Long Term

On-going support for local companies and pro-active promotion of Tier 1 and Tier 2 sectors for FDI

Pro-active promotion of selective Tier 3 sectors for FDI, and support for local

cluster development

Continued internationalisation of

regional capabilities

Place marketing and 5G test beds promotion to underpin business attraction across

all market opportunities

Business attraction activity to leverage additional profile generated by Coventry

2021 and Birmingham 2022

Page 121: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

15 | P a g e

Investment process, working collaboratively across the region The proposed WMGC investment process was outlined in the WMGC business plan. Appendix 2 shows the proactive investment process, whereby a pipeline of enquiries is created using insight, lead generation and intermediaries. Appendix 3 illustrates the reactive process, whereby enquiries are received by WMGC, processed, shared with regional partners and managed until delivery. It is proposed that a reactive approach is taken for tier 2 sectors: technology businesses involved in the internet of things and companies involved in the research and development and manufacture of materials.

Internationalisation activity will be focused on promoting the capabilities of local West Midlands’ clusters linked to two key themes in the short term – Smart Mobility and Data Driven Healthcare. These themes have been chosen as they cross both existing cluster strengths, automotive, rail, aerospace, advanced manufacturing, medical technology etc. as well as encompassing developing sectors for the future, CAV (connected and autonomous vehicles), battery storage, cyber security and life sciences. Both market opportunities will benefit from two of the 5G testbeds and internationalisation of these two themes to key global regions will involve working closely with our university partners, as the strength of our innovation offer will be critical to the development of both market opportunities.

Global target markets The historical investment trends for the region are illustrated in Table 6 below5

Table 7: Jobs created by foreign investment in the West Midlands, by origin country (2007-2017)

5 IBM-PLI GLT database 2017

Page 122: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

16 | P a g e

In light of the changing global economic environment, for example a more isolationist US president, uncertainty over Brexit and the slowdown of the Chinese economy, there will be a need to target UK based companies in the short term. The results of the current WMGC led research into these opportunities will shared in Summer 2019. IBM outlined a broad range of countries which could be targeted for foreign investment. Table 8 below summarises which countries will be targeted for investment, in each sector. The WMGC Business Attraction team are reviewing all of the recommendations and have produced a draft missions plan which illustrates countries to be targeted over the next 18 - 24 months – see Appendix 4. It is envisaged that via the WMCA SLA there will be a senior leader mission to China, US and Germany, 4 smaller business attraction led missions and one capital attraction mission funded by the SLA.

Table 8: Target country profile

Page 123: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

17 | P a g e

Delivering Regional Business Attraction

Role of the WMGC Delivering inward investment into a region is a team effort. In order to increase levels of activity across the region there will need to be high levels of collaboration across a range of different stakeholders in both the public and private sectors. Over the next two months WMGC will meet with the investment leads of each regional authority to agree protocols around handing over investment enquiries, for local teams to deliver. This meeting will also be used to agree the list of potential accounts to be managed by WMGC.

The WMGC’s mission will be to attract businesses, visitors and capital to the region through integrated support and effective national and international promotion. They will support cluster development and innovation via brokerage and insight in relation to the sectors outlined by this strategy. This role will involve:

1. Support for the expansion of local FDI companies through active management and the targeting of specific parent companies for new investment activity

2. Leading targeted, pro-active marketing and promotion of the WMCA area to investors and companies.

3. Act as a prime point of contact for companies and potential co-ordinator for wider promotional activities linked to sector development and growth, such as the Tech sector.

4. Support the indigenous growth of companies through international promotion of the region’s capabilities.

5. Act as a facilitator for partnerships between foreign and domestic companies and industry-university collaboration for research, skills and cluster development.

6. Support the after-care of foreign owned companies and facilitate wider cluster development, as well as future expansions of foreign owned companies.

Collaboration and partnerships The WMGC will promote the region to national and international businesses and investor. They will lead the regional narrative, with local teams delivering a local proposition. In order to increase levels of activity across the region there will need to be high levels of collaboration across a range of different stakeholders in both the public and private sectors. The company will work closely with the regional local government infrastructure, including the Mayor’s office, the three LEPs, the WMCA and Local Government economic development teams. Over the next two months WMGC will meet with the investment leads of each regional authority to agree protocols around handing over investment enquiries, for local teams to deliver. This meeting will also be used to agree the list of potential accounts to be managed by WMGC.

Historically over 20% of leads for the WMGC have been generated by partnering with private sector businesses, professional advisors and intermediaries. The WMGC will develop and expand these relationships both locally, nationally and internationally to generate and convert a larger regional pipeline of investment enquiries.

Page 124: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

18 | P a g e

WMGC also has a strong relationship with the Department of International Trade and the Midlands Engine. The BAS will seek to deepen and develop these links further, looking to support and leverage government funded international activity on both a national and global level. Activity will also focus on developing links with Embassies and foreign office staff based in the key target countries listed above, as well as London.

Under-pinning all of this, the WMGC will maximise the close relationship with their six university partners. Throughout all regional promotion, the company will highlight the breadth of the innovation and research and development strengths of the region, as well as working with other further and higher education organisations to support investor talent requirements.

The following appendices illustrate previous case studies which show the different types of investment projects which will use these agreed protocols:

Appendix 5 – GEZE - proactive lead generation, WMGC delivery

Appendix 6 – Guhring – insight lead generation, account management and expansion

Appendix 7 – Homes England – WMGC lead generation, local partner delivery

Appendix 8 – G&W – lead generation via intermediary, WMGC delivery

Appendix 9 – Shield Group – lead generation via intermediary, local partner delivery

Appendix 10 – Sulzer – WMGC account management, WMGC expansion delivery

As WMGC will be acting as a regional investment organisation, it is anticipated that going forward, the majority of projects will be landed by regional partners as highlighted by Appendices 7 and 9.

Tactics to deliver regional business attraction In order to deliver the required outcomes indicated at the start of this paper, a sales and marketing activity plan will be developed for each of the sectors in Tiers 1 and 2. Internationalisation activity will be framed around the LIS sector development strategies and will be based on the same broad principles outlined below:

1. There will be a strong focus on insight led targeting of companies (companies, intermediaries and associations i.e. a personal sell)

2. Regular communication, with high quality content, to key contacts amongst target markets and investment communities

3. Using the skills of the WMGC PR teams to seed content to raise the profile of both sectors and the regional proposition

4. Development of a West Midlands Investment Portal which will link to local sites and use regular updates, tactical search engine optimisation and compelling interactive content to maximise profile

5. Deployment of a targeted tech marketing campaigns linked to the Make Your Mark theme to set up targeted meetings with C-level executives in priority markets and companies

Page 125: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

19 | P a g e

6. Via the WMGC Place Marketing work, creation of an international network of regional Ambassadors via selective and targeted use of social media channels to promote news and success stories

7. Creation of strong links with London based foreign embassies, relocation consultants and foreign based organisations to build a regional pipeline.

8. Engagement of foreign based lead generation agencies in key markets – China, US, Germany and possibly India.

9. Provision of regular feedback to WMCA stakeholders on the status of the investment pipeline, and feedback on activity progress.

Outputs The WMGC team has been operating as an Inward Investment Agency since 2011 –

first covering Birmingham and then the wider Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP

area since 2012. Over the last 7 years the company has developed a strong pipeline

of prospects, successfully landing high numbers of projects and new jobs. The 47

inward investment projects landed in 2017-2018 was nearly 3 times the number

recorded in 2011-2012 and the number of associated new jobs created was nearly

double the figure in 2011-2012.

Source: DIT

During 2018-2019 the company operated over a wider WMCA geography, and have

been collaborating with local investment agencies in the Black Country and Coventry

and Warwickshire to attract inward investment to the wider region.

Nevertheless, reflecting the current contractual position of the company, the majority

of projects are still being landed in Greater Birmingham and Solihull area. This is due

2,257 2,415 2,591

3,5644,028

3,150

4,386

17

4142

53

31

5047

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18

WMGC/Marketing Birmingham involved successes (FDI and UK inward investment)

New Jobs Projects

Page 126: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

20 | P a g e

to the strength of the pipeline which is the culmination of predominantly Birmingham

funded activity over the last 7 years

Over the course of FY 18/19, it is anticipated that more than 90% of targets,

prospects and qualifying projects, 84% of involved successes and 76% of new jobs

created will be in Greater Birmingham.

WMGC 2018-2019 pipeline

Actuals as at end of January Year-end forecast

Wider

WMCA area Greater

Birmingham Total

Wider WMCA area

Greater Birmingham

Total

Targets 17 1,528 1,545 20 1,834 1,854

Prospects 12 667 679 14 800 815

Qualifying projects 9 228 237 11 274 284

Completed projects/involved successes

6 32 38 7 38 46

New jobs created 397 1,265 1,662 476 1,518 1,994

Forecasts for 2019-2020 and the 2019-2022 period for WMCA contract The forecasts are based on the following assumptions:

That company will aim to achieve a similar return on investment as it did in

2018-2019 (i.e. targets, prospects, qualifying projects, completed projects and

new jobs created per £ of budget), with the proviso that:

o The WMGC is making a fundamental transition from focusing on

attracting inward investment to the Greater Birmingham and Solihull

LEP area to a regional promotional agency covering the LEP

geography.

o The team will need to build greater intelligence, contacts, networks and

a well-established brand identity and collateral relating to the WMCA

area.

o The majority of the current pipeline is for the Greater Birmingham area

and the team will need to build a similarly strong pipeline across the

WMCA area as a whole.

Based on the above, it is recommended that the company has the following KPIs

Building a WMCA-wide pipeline: KPIs for 2019-2020

Page 127: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

21 | P a g e

KPI Target

Senior level Missions 3

International trade show attendance 10

Account management of strategic

businesses

70

Sector dinners – to foster expansions,

intermediary contacts

5

Lead generation services procured 3 geographic areas

NGDBs engaged with/attracted TBC

Marcomms campaigns - Tech 1

Regional sector propositions agreed 10

o In 2019-2020 the team will still be delivering the ‘Investing in Greater

Birmingham’ ERDF Programme which, due to its required focus on

SMEs, is very resource intensive delivering relatively limited numbers

of businesses attracted and jobs created –as well as other

programmes such as FDIAAE, which are also specifically focused on

the Greater Birmingham and Wolverhampton areas.

o While at the time of writing the exact format and implications of Brexit

are still to be confirmed, the uncertainty alone is already leading to

significant reductions in the amount of FDI being attracted to the UK, a

trend which is expected to continue in 2019-2020.

To take account of these factors, it is proposed that an ‘optimism bias’ of 35%

is added to forecasts based on HM Treasury Green Book Guidance (i.e. we

have made the assumption that, due to these factors, the return on

investment may be up to 35% lower than in 2018-2019).

Taking all this into account it is proposed that the company achieves the following

outputs:

Exploitation of the 7-year pipeline mentioned above, which is anticipated to

yield more than 600 prospects from nearly 1,400 targets (of which around 500

will be new investment opportunities generated over the course of the year),

resulting in more than 200 qualifying projects.

Page 128: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

22 | P a g e

Delivery of more than 34 completed projects, creating nearly 1,500 new jobs.

Over the 2019-2022 period we anticipate that more than 100 completed

projects will be achieved, creating nearly 4,500 new jobs.

Breakdown between new investments and expansions Over the last 3 years (2015-2016 to 2017-2018) on average 57% of projects landed by the WMGC were new investments and 43% were expansions. New projects accounted for 40% of new jobs created, meanwhile, while 60% were accounted for by expansions. Based on the assumption that the breakdown will be similar over the next few years

we forecast that:

Of the 34 projects expected to land in 2019-2020, 20 will be new investments

and 14 will be expansions and of the 103 expected to land over the 2019-

2022 period 59 will be new projects and 44 will be expansions

In 2019-2020 new investments will create nearly 600 jobs and expansions will

create more than 900 new jobs. Over the 2019-2022 period, new investments

will create nearly 1,800 jobs and expansions will create more than 2,700 new

jobs.

1,392

612213 34

1,497

4,175

1,835

640

103

4,491

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Targets Prospects Qualifyingprojects

Completedprojects

New jobscreated

WMGC deliverables

2019-2020 2019-2022

Page 129: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 12

15/04/2019 1 of 2

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP

BOARD MEETING

25 April 2019

2019/20 LEP Delivery Plan

Recommendations

Board Directors are asked to:

1. Note new requirement from government to publish annual Delivery Plan for LEP activities by 31 May 2019, including informal guidance developed by LEP Network

2. Receive and comment on draft proposed Delivery Plan for GBSLEP, which incorporates key LEP activities for the year 2019/2020

3. Delegate final sign-off and publication of designed Delivery Plan to the LEP Chair and LEP Director

Background

4. As part of Strengthening Local Enterprise Partnerships, the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has asked all LEPs to produce annual delivery plans, setting out their proposed activities and deliverables for the forthcoming year.

5. MHCLG have not produced formal guidance for this document, and, as they only requested that LEPs produced this document late in financial year 18/19, has asked the LEP Network to work with LEP Chairs to produce informal guidance for content as part of a “light-touch” approach to Delivery Plans in 19/20. The informal guidance for this document is appended to this paper.

6. With its work on Delivery Plans, strong capital pipeline for Local Growth Funds, management of the Enterprise Zone, the recently approved Stakeholder Engagement Plan and key role in the design of the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands, GBSLEP is well placed to produce this Plan as part of its business as usual planning.

Key Issues

7. Draft wording for the proposed LEP Delivery Plan is provided in Appendix B. Specifically, as part of the LEP’s Business Plan for the year, this includes:

Key activities for each of the LEP’s sector and cross-cutting delivery plans with target dates

Local Growth Fund projects that are likely to complete in 2019/20 and Local Growth Fund projects that we anticipate will start in 2019/20

Plans for European Structural and Investment Funds – as approved by the ESIF sub-committee

Page 130: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 12

15/04/2019 2 of 2

Growth Hub deliverables as already submitted to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)

Planned completions and new projects for Birmingham Enterprise Zone

Wider strategic activity including increased levels of stakeholder engagement and proposed work on the implementation of the Local Industrial Strategy

Conclusion

8. Board Directors are asked to note the LEP’s proposed activities for 19/20 and, if felt appropriate, comment on final presentation to government.

Report by: Katie Trout LEP Director

Contact: [email protected]

07825 318250

Date Created: 15 April 2019

Appendices a. LEP Network Guidance for LEP Delivery

Plans b. Draft wording for GBSLEP Delivery Plan

19/20

Page 131: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Delivery Plan 2019-20 Matrix

This Delivery Plan matrix has been created by the Delivery Plan LEP Network Working Group to

provide LEPs guidance on what should be included in their Delivery Plans. Although local innovation

and creativity is encouraged, all LEPs should cover the sections outlined below to ensure consistency

across the network.

Timing of Delivery Plans for 2019-20

LEPs must complete a draft Delivery Plan by the end of April 2019. These Delivery Plans should be

signed-off by the LEP Board and published by the end of May 2019.

Future Delivery Plans

The Delivery Plans for 2019-20 are designed to be light touch. The design and content of the Delivery

Plans will be revisited next year to take account of best practice, the LEP Economic Outlook and the

development of Local Industrial Strategies.

Delivery Plan (covering the period April 2019 - March 2020)

Heading

Information

1. Summary and

strategic

objectives

Summary headlines from the LEP’s Strategic Economic Plan (or

equivalent like a Mayor’s economic ambition) providing the context for

the LEP’s ambitions. It will include linkages and reference to the LIS plans

for year ahead. If applicable, the LEP should note any objectives that

address the five foundations of productivity: ideas, people,

infrastructure, business environment and places.

The summary should provide an at-a-glance summary of the key

indicators that feature in the LEP’s Delivery Plan (so that a total summary

of LEP indicators can be accumulated) and how these will illustrate the

progress the LEP is making towards their objectives outlined above.

Typical indicators are suggested below:

• businesses supported;

• jobs that businesses created;

• total investment;

• private sector leverage;

• houses built (due to LEP investment / influence);

• infrastructure created etc.

Page 132: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Not every indicator will be relevant to every LEPs’ Delivery Plan. Local

creativity is encouraged as to how this information is presented. LEPs

could feature this summary as a series of infographics on the front page

of the Delivery Plan, or a series of tables, graphs etc. When providing

performance data LEPs should report against forecast:

2. Local Growth

Fund

Outline what the LGF will achieve in the next 12 months. This should

include:

• Projects reaching completion/ significant milestones.

• Projects planned for the year ahead.

A degree of creativity will be left to each LEP’s discretion. For example,

LEPs could provide a ‘heat map’ showing where a LEP’s investments will

take place.

There should be a degree of detail that breaks the activity down into

project, themes or sectors: infrastructure, transport, roads, broadband,

innovation, research, creative industry, manufacturing etc. There could

be a read across to the LIS or SEP.

LEPs should provide a breakdown of the performance against indicators

to date and the forecast of expected outcomes at programme level at the

year end. As best practice, LEPs may wish to break this down at project

level. LEPs should report against the following:

Output

Actual

achieved to

date

Forecast in

2019-20

Current

Forecast for

2020-21

Total Forecast 1

1 This can include any forecast outputs expected to be achieved after 2020-21 e.g. up to 2030.

Page 133: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

LEPs should outline any plans for monitoring and evaluating this

programme.

3. Other Funding

or Growth

Programmes

The LEP should capture funding progress and plans for their other

funding programmes over the next 12 months e.g. Growth Hubs, City

Deals, European Funding, Enterprise Zones.

As with LGF, there should be a degree of detail that breaks the activity

down into project, themes or sectors: infrastructure, transport, roads,

broadband, innovation, research, creative industry, manufacturing etc.

There could be a read across to the LIS or SEP. LEPs should provide a

breakdown of the performance against indicators to date and the

forecast of expected outcomes at programme level. As best practice,

LEPs may wish to break this down at project level. LEPs should report

against the following

Output

Actual

achieved to

date

Forecast in

2019-20

Current

Forecast for

2020-21

Total Forecast 2

LEPs should outline any plans for monitoring and evaluating these

programmes.

4. Strategic

Activity.

This covers the wider strategic activity and influencing through

partnership working and convening that LEPs do.

It includes multi-LEP working in a wider sub-national area, or connecting

with other LEPs from a wider geography across the network on theme

areas (energy, aero space etc.) - cross LEP collaboration in the coming

year.

2 This can include any forecast outputs expected to be achieved after 2020-21 e.g. up to 2030.

Page 134: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

LEPs should also outline their plans for engaging with the wider public,

voluntary and community-based bodies.

The LEP will outline the approach and opportunities (with a timeline if

appropriate) for how they will consult with the business community

(including AGM etc.).

LEPs can also include the ‘soft power’ influencing role of LEPs, as

convenors, bringing the private sector view into local economic decision

making.

Page 135: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Item 12 Appendix B ‐ Draft wording for GBSLEP Delivery Plan 19/20 

 Greater Birmingham & Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership  Delivery Plan 2019‐20  Introduction 

Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership’s (GBSLEP’s) annual delivery plan sets out our intended activities and deliverables for 2019/20 in our mission to help the economy of Greater Birmingham and Solihull continue to grow and thrive.  In part this will be achieved through delivery of our capital programmes and Enterprise Zone and, in part, through specific revenue based interventions supported by funding through our Business Rates Pool.    Given the ongoing uncertainty in the UK economy, our proposed interventions are subject to change as we remain alert to, and agile in, our responses to the challenges and opportunities that the second biggest economy in the UK brings.  We will no doubt do far more over the year than this plan outlines.  Likewise, there will be some proposed interventions that, as the economy changes, will evolve, grow or, in some cases, not be taken forward.  Given this, our Plan outlines our proposed activities for the 19/20 period.  Context and Geography 

The Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP) was established in 2010 as a partnership of business, public sector and further and higher education leaders.  Our geography spans nine local authority boundaries: Birmingham, Solihull, East Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, Lichfield, Tamworth, Redditch, Bromsgrove and Wyre Forest. We have a population of just over 2 million people, an estimated 1,038,000 jobs, and an economy worth £46.8bn.  Greater Birmingham and Solihull is home to one of the largest professional and financial centres outside of London, with a world‐leading advanced manufacturing base, burgeoning creative and cultural industries and emerging strengths in life sciences. We are the location of choice for international companies such as Mondelēz International, Deutsche Bank, HSBC and Jaguar Land Rover.  As a business‐led partnership, working closely alongside public sector and educational partners, we have distinct advantages. We are able to take a private sector view of the supply side constraints on growth and provide a forum for demand and supply sides to come together to agree action.  As a collaborative partnership, we work for the benefit of everyone who lives and works in the LEP area. Our success hinges on delivering interventions that bring about meaningful change, leading to sustainable economic growth. This collaborative and business focused approach enables us to target interventions for maximum benefit to the local economy.  In 2016, we refreshed our Strategic Economic Plan, in close consultation with our partners, to reflect our vision and strategy for delivering smarter, more sustainable and more inclusive growth for the benefit of 

Page 136: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

our area, the wider West Midlands and the UK as a whole.  This involved a clear focus on increasing business and workforce productivity, raising skills levels and stimulating levels of business innovation.  In 18/19 we worked closely with our partners to focus our activity on interventions where we had a clear role and added value to the local economy.  This resulted in a focus on our highest growth sectors, along with a number of cross‐cutting themes such as place‐making and skills at NVQ3 and above.  Other sectors and themes are vital to sustainable economic growth but the view of the LEP Board was that other agencies, such as local authorities or the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) were better placed than the LEP to address them.  In addition, in 18/19 we have worked hard, with our neighbouring LEPs in the Black Country and Coventry and Warwickshire, along with the WMCA, to develop a Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands.  Our proposed delivery plan for 19/20 focuses on those areas of priority and in preparing activity for wider implementation of the Local Industrial Strategy.  

Our Mission 

GBSLEP’s mission is to drive the economic growth of the Greater Birmingham and Solihull area, creating jobs and increasing the quality of life for all our residents.  

In order to achieve our mission, GBSLEP has three main roles to play: 

 

Agitator 

Acting as a voice for the GBSLEP area, we will use our influence to secure greater funding and powers from the government and greater investment from the private sector, both at home and overseas.  An example from 18/19 was working with national agency, Be the Business, and their Mentoring for Growth programme – which pairs leaders of ambitious SMEs with experienced business mentors – to launch nationally following a highly successful pilot in the Greater Birmingham area.  

Enabler 

Bringing together existing partners and organisations within the area, we will support and guide activity and resources in order to meet shared priorities.  The Towns and Local Centres Framework (launched in 18/19) is a good example of how the LEP enables partners, throughout the region, to work towards their objectives; the document outlines specific criteria for funding to guide partners when they create local place‐making strategies for the improvement of towns and local centres whose success is critical for the sustained economic growth of the region.  Commissioner 

Using resources directly aligned to the LEP, we invest in priorities that support our mission.  An example of this in 18/19 is the approval of funding for Tyseley Energy Park and a pilot Hydrogen Bus scheme, which will use the Energy Park to refuel. These ambitious, joined‐up schemes will support the region’s transport, energy and economic requirements in a sustainable manner. 

Page 137: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

 As a series of headline Key Performance Indicator(s) the LEP aims to measure how it influences the performance of the Greater Birmingham economy (Table 1 below).  GBS LEP KPI  Baseline (2010)  Current  Progress 

To Date 

Progress 

Latest Data 

Create 250,000 private sector jobs by 2030 

633,600  800,686 

(2017 data) 

167,086 

(67% of target) 

29,452 

Increase GVA by £29bn by 2030 

£42bn  £50.3bn 

(2017 data) 

£8.3bn  

(29% of target) 

£0.8bn 

Decrease Unemployment to the national average by 2020 

2.7% Point Gap with UK average 

1.3% gap with UK average 

(June 2018) 

 

1.4% points 

(52% of target) 

0.6% points 

To have the lowest unemployment of LEP Core Cities by 2030 

5.1% Gap with Leading Core City 

2.3%  

Point Gap with Leading CC (West of England, June 2018) 

2.8% Points 

(55% of target)               

0.1% point 

To be the Leading Core City LEP for GVA per head by 2030 

£7,123 per Head Gap  £4,159 Per Head Gap  

(2017)                              

£2,141   Per Head          

(34% of target) 

Gap reduced by £262 per head 

Increase the % of working age population with NVQ3+ to national average by 2025 

5.6% Point Gap with UK 

4.9% Point Gap with UK  

(Sept 2017) 

 0.6% Point 

(10% of target) 

1.7% point reduction in gap 

  (Baseline 2015)       

Increase GVA per hour [productivity rate] to national average by 2030 

£5.81 GVA per hour Gap 

£1.72 per hour Gap 

(2017) 

£4.11 gap closed 

(71% of target) 

£0.51 Gap closed 

Leading Core City LEP for Quality of Life by 2030 

Ranked 5/8  Ranked 3/8 

(2015 ‐ 2017) 

Up 2 places  Up 1 place 

 

Page 138: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

As part of the LEP’s contributions to addressing these KPIs for the wider economy, we commission a range of interventions both capital and revenue.  Section 2 (below) highlights how we do this for our capital funding, including through the Local Growth Fund programme and our Enterprise Zone.  In addition to these investments, we make a series of revenue based interventions through the use of our Strategic Economic Plan (SEP) Enabling Fund, which is a contribution from our local authority partners resulting from an uplift in business rates.  This Fund, combined with our capital funding, enables us to focus on nine delivery plans – five sector based and four that cut across our economy, details of which follow below.  Each of these delivery plans is designed to realise direct benefit to companies in the Greater Birmingham and Solihull economy and forms a part of the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands. 

19/20 Deliverables1 

Business Support and Access to Finance including Growth Hub [Business Environment]2 

Effective support for businesses across the Greater Birmingham and Solihull area is crucial to solving the productivity challenges that our local economy faces.  Evidence demonstrates that entrepreneurs and business owners who receive external help and support are more likely to have better performing, more successful businesses.  Although Birmingham (data not available at GBSLEP level) has a low level of self‐employment against the national average, there is an increasing appetite for business start‐up, with Birmingham having the highest start‐up rate outside of London for the past six years running.  Business survival rates are, however, not as strong and the city‐region is still behind the national average, indicating the importance of continuing to drive effective support to our businesses grow and survive longer. 

Our focus in 19/20 will be on continuing to provide a core level of support to all businesses through our Growth Hub, and the services it signposts through Growth Hub delivery partners, while growing activity to ensure that there is substantial added value in the specific services that the LEP provides for businesses through scale‐up programmes; pilots with national organisations such as the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) and Be the Business; inclusive growth programmes aimed at business owners and managers in our diverse communities across the city‐region; and ensuring that our businesses are able to access the finance they need to grow and thrive.  In addition, and under the auspices of the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands, we will work with Black Country and Coventry and Warwickshire LEPs to explore where our collective business support offerings can add value across the West Midlands.  Specific business support activities in 19/20 include: 

Deliver the next phase of the Growth Hub through an enhanced partnership model that focuses on simplifying the local business support landscape and maximising the value of the Growth Hub on the local economy – Q3 19/20 

                                                            1 Where possible, deliverables are indicated by quarter with Q1 representing the period Apr – Jun 2019, Q2 Jul – Sep 2019, Q3 Oct – Dec 2019 and Q4 Jan – Mar 2020. 

2 Wording in square parentheses, [ . . . ] indicates which of the national Industrial Strategy foundations of productivity specific interventions relate to 

Page 139: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Grow our Growth Hub scale‐up offer and plan for next phase of development, including working with Be the Business on delivering and growing their Productivity Leadership Group Mentoring pilot – Q2 19/20 

Continue to develop access to finance services through core Growth Hub Access to Finance service; increasing the quality and success of applications to the Midlands Engine Investment Fund; and support the establishment of a more connected and structured angel investment ecosystem within Greater Birmingham and the West Midlands – Q4 19/20 

Further develop partnership activity with the Department for International Trade (DIT) to ensure a robust export support offer, particularly in focusing the offer on “export ready” business – Q3 19/20 

Improve access to mainstream and specialist business support for businesses outside of existing support networks, particularly in some of our diverse communities, through development of a Commonwealth Games growth support programme and expansion of our inclusive growth business support programme – Q4 19/20 

Innovation and Enabling Technologies [Ideas] 

It is a key objective of our SEP that Greater Birmingham become a “world leader in innovation and creativity, commercialising cutting‐edge research and innovation” and to “stimulate demand‐led innovation to increase business and workforce productivity and competitiveness.  As part of the Local Industrial Strategy and complementing the proposed Innovation Framework and Programme for the West Midlands, LEP delivery will focus on driving innovation in key sectors in the Greater Birmingham economy, helping to realise future market opportunities and ensure that the research excellence in our universities realises wider economic benefits in the Greater Birmingham and West Midlands economy.  To inform this work, in 18/19 the LEP commissioned external consultants to co‐design interventions that will increase levels of business innovation.  Delivery of these pilot interventions will commence in 19/20.  Activities include: 

Develop and deliver pilot innovation programme with a focus on i) challenge based events with an emphasis on cross‐sectoral activity ii) financial support for R&D iii) company centric innovation support – Q4 19/20 

Support development of key demonstrators, commercialisation of research and support for businesses based on the research excellence of our universities, including (but not limited to) key areas where we have acknowledged national expertise such as energy, quantum technologies and data‐driven healthcare and life sciences supported through a translational ecosystem – ongoing 

Support (primarily through capital funding) projects that stimulate and support market‐led innovation amongst businesses in key growth industries by deploying strong market‐led perspectives in appraisal of funding bids with an expansion of LEP capital pipeline for innovation ‐ by Q4 19/20 

Extend the pilot Innovation Enabler, in conjunction with IPO, to support SMEs in key growth industries to recognise and realise the value of their intellectual property (IP) through R&D and innovation collaboration – Q4 19/20 

Page 140: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Skills [People] 

Our long‐term people ambition is to accelerate an increase in our skilled workforce ensuring that the gap between our skills levels at least matches the national levels and meets the increasing local employer demands for higher skilled labour. Skills shortages and gaps that continue to increase as the local economy grows can act as a brake on the productivity and future growth of our economy.   

As of 2017 data, this means that we need to appropriately upskill over 63,000 more people at NVQ Level 3 (A Level) and above to meet national levels: to reach this level we will require an approximate 10% increase in the current working age population qualified to NVQ Level 3+.   

Our plan for skills aims to i) use partnership and collaboration to tackle skills shortages and gaps that are barriers to long‐term business growth and productivity ii) motivate and inspire people to develop skills for key sectors for growth and technologies iii) develop employer led programmes to increase workforce diversity, to combat skills shortages and drive economic growth and iv) prime the adoption of disruptive and emergent technologies to enable skills development that matches today and tomorrow’s skills needs. 

Our Plan directly aligns with and complements the emerging Regional Sector Employer Task Forces, the Local Industrial Strategy, as well as delivery of the Regional Skills Plan at West Midlands level.   

Facilitate new employer led approaches to ensure training provision that better meets and keeps pace with industry demands through increasing sector based work academies and securing dedicated skills brokers in our Growth Hub – Q4 19/20 

Motivate and inspire people to develop skills for key sectors for growth by highlighting opportunities across our key sectors to ensure business growth and productivity is not inhibited through the lack of appropriately skilled staff – Q4 19/20 

Develop employer led programmes to increase workforce diversity by supporting and promoting new approaches to growing businesses to reach and encourage the entry of young and diverse talent into our key sectors – Q4 19/20 

Encourage employer supported experimentation and early adoption in the use of new technologies for training in future skills needs including provision of facilities and capital equipment to meet future skills needs ‐ ongoing 

During 19/20 we also plan to work with partners to develop an initiative that will substantially increase the cohort of learners entering NVQ3+. This is a long term plan, which meets the skills gap within Greater Birmingham and the wider West Midlands economy.  Deliverables in 19/20 will be production of the plan, agreement with partners and early stage activities in Q4. 

Place‐making [Places and Infrastructure] 

The importance of a sense of place and a quality of place is vital to a thriving and a healthy economy.  Creating vibrant, exciting and inclusive places for people to live and work is key to retaining and attracting the talented people that our companies need to grow and thrive.  The impacts of high quality place‐making on local economies are well documented and are essential to maintaining sustainable economic growth as part of a Local Industrial Strategy.   

Page 141: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

From discussions with key businesses, we have identified four key place‐making constraints to future growth i) a lack of key employment sites ii) too costly and inflexible energy infrastructure iii) the need to maximise the opportunity and potential impact of large‐scale infrastructure investments iv) constrained housing stock.   

Additionally talent attraction and retention depends on ensuring that Greater Birmingham and Solihull is a great place to live and work and to that end, in 18/19, we focused activity on enabling our towns and local centres to maximise their full potential and to supporting our cultural offer to extend right across the city‐region.  In 19/20 we will further build on these achievements. 

Completion of Strategic Employment Sites study across the West Midlands, including making clear recommendations to address barriers to strategic employment sites and exploring the potential to develop a pipeline of sites to meet market demand – Q2 19/20 

Build on our Towns and Local Centres Framework by supporting our local authority (and other) partners to develop individual town and local centres plans, develop an ecosystem/economic geography approach to identifying key areas for investment benefiting the whole of the LEP geography and carry out an audit of future workspace requirements in our towns and local centres – Q4 19/20 

Deliver the key recommendations of our Housing Framework, including exploring the potential of establishing a joint delivery vehicle for future investment – Q4 19/20 

Develop and implement a Cultural Action toolkit, cultural development cluster fund and cultural action zones aimed at encouraging culture based projects to come forward for capital funding across the geography, exploring the overall impact of culture‐led regeneration outside of central Birmingham – Q4 19/20 

In addition to the cross‐cutting, foundational priorities for our economy, we will also prioritise activities in our five high growth sectors. 

Business, Professional and Financial Services 

Business, Professional and Financial Services provide nearly a third of Greater Birmingham’s economic output and provide a key source of Foreign Direct Investment. Strengths include insurance, law, support services, Islamic finance and Fintech.  The business and professional services sector is by far the largest priority sector in Greater Birmingham and Solihull in terms of employment accounting for around 20% of total employment in the area, much of which is high value added. 

Key market opportunities include next generation modern services, including emerging clusters such as FinTech and blockchain technology, cyber security, and data analytics, all of which have the potential to shape the future of services in Greater Birmingham and across the UK.  While this is a substantial opportunity that we aim to encourage to grow and thrive, skills are a challenge for the sector, particularly through embracing digital skills but also ensuring that there is a pipeline of diverse talent to meet the future skills needs of the sector.  Our interventions in 19/20 propose to address these opportunities and challenges and will be specifically aligned to the “modern services” opportunity as outlined in the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands. 

Design and implement a collaborative lab pilot programme ‘AI for professional services’ with a focus on the legal subsector, in conjunction with our universities – Q1 19/20 launch [Ideas] 

Page 142: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

Provide cluster development and support for our FinTech sector to widen the business base and grow the supply chain – Q2 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Launch a BPFS school leaver (pre 19) training scheme focused on skills for next generation services – Q3 19/20 [People] 

Creative Industries 

Creative Industries have a demonstrable potential to grow substantially in Greater Birmingham and across the wider West Midlands with strengths in advertising and marketing; design; software; jewellery and high value ‘makers’ with potential to grow substantially in film and tv; games; serious games; virtual reality; augmented reality; and web based services. 

Through our leadership of the Local Industrial Strategy development and implementation plan for the creative industries, we have identified, with partners, a number of initiatives that have substantial potential to both enable the growth of creative industries in Greater Birmingham and across the West Midlands and maximise their impact on other sectors. 

Address gaps in pre‐commercial specialist infrastructure (incubators and accelerators) by identifying gaps and opportunities and bringing forward a pipeline of projects for capital funding – Q3 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Develop and deliver, working under the auspices of the Local Industrial Strategy, creative industries sector support and scale‐up programme – Q1 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Launch a cluster development Fund to invest in the capacity of sector intermediaries to develop the creative cluster ecosystem – Q2 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Launch a specific “screen” initiative focused on locations, production services and supply chain cluster development to realise the potential of filming and production in the West Midlands – Q2 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Improve the effectiveness of existing skills pipeline and career progression for the creative industries by bringing together key regional employers and freelancers; developing a multi‐employer apprenticeship model to suit the needs of the sector; and pilot a new entrants support programme – Q4 19/20 [Skills] 

Life Sciences 

As the lead LEP for life sciences through the development and planned implementation of the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands, our delivery plan focuses on those interventions that will attract investment and support the growth of the region’s life sciences industry, capitalising on the region’s strengths in translational medicine to capture a significant share of the rapidly growing global market for data‐driven healthcare innovation.  Our interventions address both key market opportunities and barriers to growth in Greater Birmingham and across the West Midlands. 

Lead, on behalf of the West Midlands, the commissioning of a Cluster Development Plan that draws on best practice from other clusters and identifies stakeholder‐owned actions to develop an 

Page 143: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

 

attractive and supportive regional cluster offer to industry and investors  ‐ Q3 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Support Birmingham Health Partners to bring forward the UK’s first regionally‐scaled integrated translational research and health data innovation hub (Precision Health Technologies Accelerator) as phase one of the Birmingham Life Sciences Park development – target to commence construction in Q3 20/21 [Infrastructure] 

Commission work to confirm the level of current and anticipated demand for incubation and grow‐on space to identify any likely shortfall against current plans and options to address any shortfall – Q2 19/20 [Infrastructure] 

Work with the Intellectual Property Office to identify and share best practice in IP sharing/agreements to support life sciences company engagement in collaborative R&D projects – Q1 19/20 [Ideas] 

Work with industry and academic partners to explore potential initiatives to encourage graduate retention and development – Q2 19/20 [People] 

Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering 

Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering provides both high value jobs and catalyses innovation across multiple sectors in the Greater Birmingham economy.  As a sector, it accounts for 13.5% of economic output, compared with a UK average of 10.6% with particular strengths in aerospace and automotive and associated supply chain activities.  Significant opportunities for growth are also provided by the next generation of rail technologies and food and drink processing and manufacturing, which employs more than 17,000 people across Greater Birmingham.  Interventions across the sector are focused on key market barriers and opportunities including skills needs across the sector, promotion of productivity gains through innovation and promoting the adoption of future technologies for growth, each of which are key drivers of productivity growth through the Local Industrial Strategy. 

Work with the national Productivity Leadership Group (PLG) to roll out an SME mentoring pilot for Advanced Manufacturing SMEs with consideration of further expansion in Q3 19/20 [People] 

Pilot approach ‐ with the Rail Alliance ‐ to diagnostic support and in depth mentoring with companies in the rail supply chain building on the investment in HS2 and increasing the knowledge within the local supply chain of the strategic direction of OEMs and Tier 1 companies  ‐ Q3 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Increasing SME exposure to the benefits of Industry 4.0 through a series of in depth technical workshops led by Drive Midlands, in collaboration with a range of partners – Q4 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Pilot a skills framework – focused on the aerospace sector – with local employers that articulates mid‐level training requirements and gaps in provision, working with the Midlands Aerospace Alliance, and leading to changes in training provision and strengthening of local workforce – Q3 19/20 [People] 

Page 144: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

10 

 

Increasing the number of manufacturing and engineering tutors in colleges and private providers to address shortages.  Project to be fully scoped and delivery to commence ‐ Q3 19/20 [People] 

Raise awareness of cyber security in manufacturers to include demonstrations and signposting to expert support – Q4 19/20 [Infrastructure/Business Environment] 

Energy Technologies and Services 

The West Midlands has distinctive economic advantages in the developing global transition to clean energy.  Strengths include a world‐class concentration of both research and commercial expertise in low‐carbon energy and a large programme of infrastructure planned for the next decade.  Identified strengths include energy storage and systems including batteries and fuel cells; power‐trains; and light‐weighting.  The energy needs of our firms and the development of our excellent low carbon technology and services businesses are key to ensuring we have a Local Industrial Strategy that embraces the challenges of a clean energy economy. Specific assets include the Energy Systems Catapult, the Energy Research Accelerator, the European Bioenergy Research Institute, the Centre for Cryogenic Energy Storage and Centre for Fuel Cell Research and the developments at Tyseley Energy Park.  Activities to maximise the impact of these aspects include: 

Continue capital investment at Tyseley Energy Park, maximising the innovation potential of new technologies and business models, realised through the Park – Q4 19/20 [Ideas/Infrastructure] 

Support the further development of Energy Innovation Zones across the West Midlands with a particular focus on Rugeley, Staffordshire as a potential third EIZ in Greater Birmingham and Solihull – Q4 19/20 [Places/Infrastructure] 

Address failings in tailored business support for low carbon businesses through the development of a low carbon network and consideration of dedicated cluster support for the sector – Q3 19/20 [Business Environment] 

Page 145: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

11 

 

Local Growth Fund 

GBSLEP has agreed three Growth Deals with government, creating a £433m Local Growth Fund programme ‐ a pipeline of capital investments that will create jobs, improve transport links, upskill our people, create houses and raise the quality of life across the region. The LGF programme is a key mechanism by which the LEP directly supports the delivery of the ambitions detailed in the GBSLEP Strategic Economic Plan and West Midlands Local Industrial Strategy. 

Operating since 2015, the LGF programme is now entering its final two years of delivery.  As of March 2019, over £109.3m had been spent on project delivery, out of a total discretionary programme value of £186m3.  For the 2019/20 financial year, it’s anticipated that [£29.2m] of LGF funding will be paid out to projects. 

The programme is seeing the number of projects reaching a successful completion grow. Over the next 12 months, some [14] projects across the programme are expected to complete delivery. This will take the total projects that are practically completed on the programme to 44 out of a programme size of [64] at this present moment.  

These projects include Battery Way Extension, Tyseley, Birmingham, which by December 2019 will have constructed a new 700m road to provide access to the 8ha Mucklow Park employment site, that will deliver up to 340,000sqm. of high quality manufacturing and distribution space.  This £6.5m project was awarded £3.7m of LGF funding.   

The £81m Redditch Gateway project was granted full approval by the LEP in April 2019.  Co‐funding between GBSLEP (£1.84m) and Worcestershire LEP will, by November 2019, have provided access to the 25.5ha commercial development site located on the eastern side of Redditch.  This is a key employment site for the Greater Birmingham & Solihull area with up to 90,000sqm of commercial floorspace creating around 2,060 jobs and £90m of additional GVA. 

Table 2 below provides a summary of all the projects that will complete over the next year. 

Project  Lead organisation Delivery Plan Alignment 

Expected completion 

Journey Time Reliability Improvements to Growth Areas Phases 1 and 2, Birmingham 

Birmingham City Council  Place‐making  June 

Battery Way Extension, Tyseley, Birmingham  Birmingham City Council  Place‐making – key employment sites 

December 

Snow Hill Public Realm, Birmingham  Birmingham City Council  BPFS  March Birmingham Cycle Revolution Phase 2  Birmingham City Council  Place‐making  March Iron Lane, Birmingham  Birmingham City Council  Place‐making  June Selly Oak New Road Phase 1b, Birmingham   Birmingham City Council  Place‐making  February Kidderminster Railway Station  Wyre Forest District 

Council Place‐making ‐ Towns and Local Centres 

November 

Kingswood Lakeside Access Phase 2, Cannock  Cannock Chase District Council 

Place‐making ‐ Key employment sites 

September 

                                                            3 This figure does not include the five large Department for Transport schemes, amounting to £246.945m of Growth Deal funding, that are accounted for separately. 

Page 146: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

12 

 

Longbridge Connectivity ‐ MSCP Phase 2, Birmingham 

Transport for West Midlands 

Place‐making ‐ Key employment sites 

October 

Aspirations for All, Selly Oak, Birmingham  Sense UK  Skills  August Clean Air Hydrogen Bus Project, Birmingham  Birmingham City Council  Innovation  September Birmingham Dance Hub  Hippodrome  Creative Industries  May Redditch Gateway  Redditch Borough 

Council Place‐making ‐ Key employment sites 

November 

Worcester Street Public Realm, Kidderminster  Wyre Forest District Council 

Place‐making ‐ Towns and Local Centres 

September 

 

There are a series of pipeline projects that are expected to progress to full approval of funding, subject to Full Business Case, or to commence project delivery on site over the next year.  Some of the highlights include the Lichfield Southern Bypass that will be starting on site in January 2020.  This project, which was awarded £2.3m of LGF funding, will enable development sites to come forward for housing and employment, including the direct unlocking of 450 new homes.  Another project reaching a key milestone will be The Outpost project, led by Solihull College and University Centre, which is expected to be [fully approved in May 2019].  Benefiting from £0.427m of LGF funding, the project will support the creative sector through provision of equipped employer engagement space, including incubation for student business start‐ups. 

Table 3 below provides a summary of the projects that will start or are expected to over the next year. 

Project  Lead organisation  Delivery Plan Alignment  Milestone Expected date 

Lichfield Southern Bypass  Staffordshire County Council  Place‐making ‐ Housing  Start on 

site  Jan 

Symphony Hall Extension, Birmingham 

Performances Birmingham Ltd 

Place‐making ‐ culture and creative industries 

Start on site  Sept 

Burton Regeneration and Flood Defence 

East Staffordshire Borough Council 

Place‐making ‐ Towns and Local Centres  FBC  June 

A38 Bromsgrove Major Scheme – Package 1 

Worcestershire County Council 

Place‐making ‐ Towns and Local Centres  FBC  May 

Commonwealth Games  Birmingham City Council  Place‐making ‐ culture  OBC  June 

Fast Track into Skills, Birmingham Birmingham Metropolitan College 

Skills  FBC  April 

Cannock Chase Engineering Academy South Staffordshire College 

Skills  OBC  May 

The Outpost, Solihull Solihull College and University Centre 

Skills  OBC  May 

Construction Skills for Readiness, Solihull 

Solihull College and University Centre 

Skills  OBC  May 

[NB To be updated with latest position prior to publication – italics indicate those projects that have not yet reached a funding decision] 

[NB Map of project locations for completions and starts to be inserted] 

With additional projects entering the programme and more completed projects starting to realise their benefits, the positive impacts of the LGF programme are increasingly being felt across the Greater Birmingham & Solihull area.  Table 4 provides a summary of performance against the forecast outcomes for 

Page 147: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

13 

 

the programme as a whole. [Table 5 at the back of this document provides a breakdown of outcomes across all projects.] 

Outcome  Actual achieved to date 

Forecast in 2019/20 

Current forecast 2020/21 

Total Forecast 

Jobs created or safeguarded  5,069  1,974  3,871  31,329 

New homes built  1,424  1,797  1,250  9,793 New learners assisted  1,036  538  310  3,911 Match funding leveraged  £490m 

[NB Actuals and forecasts to be updated following review of Q4 monitoring information] [NB Table 5 listing individual project outcomes to be included in final published version following Q4 project monitoring information]  The LGF programme will be undergoing an interim evaluation in the year ahead to understand the benefits that are being realised from the LEP investment in the local area. As well as considering the broad programme impact, the evaluation will place a spotlight on a range of projects in the form of detailed case studies that will examine the difference that the intervention has made to the everyday life of people and businesses.  A full impact evaluation will take place a year after the conclusion of programme delivery in 2022. 

 

Page 148: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

14 

 

Other Funding or Growth Programmes 

European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) 

European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) form a key part of the overall delivery of the LEP’s Strategic Economic Plan, addressing key priorities in the local economy, including driving up levels of innovation amongst businesses in our key growth sectors, providing a business support offering across the range of delivery agents in the LEP area, addressing low carbon challenges and promoting employment and employability amongst some of our most deprived communities.  By providing a mix of revenue and capital funding it complements and enables some of the benefits of the Local Growth Fund to be realised. 

The LEP has nominally been allocated €255.8 million of European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and European Social Fund (ESF) monies to be match funded 50% with other funding to cover the period 2014‐20.  As part of this, the LEP has a European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) sub‐committee that advises the managing government agencies (“Managing Authorities”) on local strategic aims alongside national strategic and operational objectives and to ensure that maximum impact is achieved through the Funds, thereby contributing to delivery of the overall national programmes.  It is the responsibility of those Managing Authorities to manage the Funds and ensure the overall deliverables of the programme are met.  This includes management of the call schedule, spend profiles and programme outputs. 

In 19/20, as the programme nears its end, it is the priority of the ESIF sub‐committee to maximise strategic use of spend to ensure projects are supported that boost economic growth and social mobility across Greater Birmingham and Solihull.  As such, a number of open calls will be prioritised in 19/20, with a particular focus on ESF through, for example, targeted calls for employability skills for the long term unemployed, to ensure, as near as possible, a full allocation of this funding.   

 

Growth Hub 

As highlighted above, our Growth Hub is the key delivery mechanism for business support and access to finance across Greater Birmingham and Solihull.  In 19/20, we will submit a further bid for European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) monies to enable the growth and expansion of the Hub via a second phase.  As part of this, the LEP will take direct responsibility for management and delivery of the Growth Hub.  This will enable a substantially enhanced and strategically aligned management and core function, embedded within the LEP structures, maintaining the vital role of partners in delivering Growth Hub services but ensuring increased strategic direction from the LEP. 

The Growth Hub will continue to offer a universal service and a single point of contact as well as a streamlined route into and through the business support ecosystem. However, all evidence suggests that targeted, account managed and tailored and/or specialist support for key businesses enables growth and productivity gains (BEIS Productivity review 2018) significantly more than low level generic support.  

As a result the Phase 2 Hub will focus on: 

‐ Specialist advice and guidance 

Page 149: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

15 

 

‐ Account managed support for key businesses ‐ Mentoring (through BTB offer) ‐ Continued support for Scale‐up companies to enable them to accelerate growth ‐ Enabling Access to Finance 

 This will be resourced through the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), LEP and ERDF funding.  As part of our Growth Hub activity, we will also seek to aggregate and specialise activities with our neighbouring Growth Hubs in Coventry and Warwickshire and the Black Country where this most makes sense. 

Specific Growth Hub deliverables for 19/20 are outlined in Table 6 below as they relate to direct Growth Hub activities: 

Businesses receiving more than 3 hours of support from the Growth Hub 

880 

Businesses receiving intensive support from the Growth Hub  

345 

Jobs created directly by Growth Hub activity  35 

 

Birmingham Enterprise Zone 

Established in 2011 the Birmingham City Centre Enterprise Zone covers 113ha across 39 sites representing the most significant growth opportunities in the city.  The Enterprise Zone focuses on early intervention in infrastructure to accelerate growth and unlock development to deliver the vision of the Big City Plan (BCP) and the GBSLEP priorities for growing the economy and creating jobs.  It provides a mechanism to accelerate development potential and maximise growth. By utilising the uplift in business rates generated by development and investing it in priority schemes, the Enterprise Zone is a unique tool to drive economic success. 

The Enterprise Zone Investment Plan (EZIP) 2019 (due to be launched in [June] 2019) consolidates the two existing investment plans: City Centre EZIP (2014) and the Curzon Investment Plan (2016) with a strategy that focusses on delivering a phased programme of £450m of projects in the period 2019‐2028.  The programme is unlocking major growth opportunities by removing barriers to development, creating a supportive environment for investment, job creation and growing the city and regional economy. The key areas for investment are: 

Strategic site investment 

Infrastructure 

Business support 

The next 12 months will see three projects reaching completion.  These are: 

Page 150: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

16 

 

Metro Extension to Centenary Square (£15.95m Enterprise Zone funding) – scheduled to be operational by the end of 2019.  This transport project will support the integration of the Westside area with the wider City Centre Core. The Metro will be extended from Birmingham New Street to Centenary Square, linking directly with the major developments at Arena Central and Paradise. 

Centenary Square Public Realm (£10.55m Enterprise Zone funding) ‐ the redevelopment of Centenary Square in summer 2019 will provide high‐quality public realm and world class setting to those landmark buildings and developments around it, such as the Library of Birmingham, ICC, Arena Central and Paradise. The Square will not only continue to provide an attractive environment for existing business and visitors but its iconic design will attract new visitors to the area and support business investment in the wider area. 

Former Curzon Station Refurbishment (£2m Enterprise Zone funding) ‐ located right next to the new HS2 Curzon Station building, the Grade 1 listed former Curzon Station building is an important heritage asset that was once the world’s first mainline passenger terminus.  HS2 and the EZ are jointly funding the redevelopment of the building to bring it back into use as a visitor and information centre for the whole HS2 project, along with office and educational space for other occupiers. It marks the first phase of regeneration activity linked to HS2 and the Curzon Programme which will create a focal point and legacy asset for the area. 

There is a stream of new pipeline projects that are expected to progress through to funding approval, subject to business case, over the coming year.  One of these projects is the much anticipated Smithfield Development that is expected to prepare its business case in autumn 2019. The project is aiming to create a landmark, sustainable, mixed use development including a family leisure hub, supported by retailers, restaurants, hotels, SME office space, new retail markets and a public spaces as well as a residential neighbourhood and integrated transport facilities.  It will be the largest single city centre redevelopment site in the UK and is expected to deliver 3000 jobs, 2000 new homes and 300,000sqm of new floorspace for a mix of uses. 

Table 7 below provides a summary of these projects. 

Project  Theme  Milestone Expected date 

Birmingham Smithfield  Key site regeneration  Full Business Case  September Curzon Metro Stop  Transport  Outline Business Case  July Southside Link Public Realm  Public realm  Outline Business Case  August Moor Street Queensway  Public realm  Full Business Case  November Belmont Works (site access for STEAMhouse)  Site access (innovation)  Full Business Case  September 

 

Table 8 provides a summary of performance against the forecast outcomes for the Enterprise Zone programme. 

Outcome Actual achieved to date 

Forecast in 2019/20 

Current forecast 2020/21  Total Forecast 

Jobs created         Land reclaimed and made ready (ha.)         

Floorspace created /         

Page 151: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

17 

 

refurbished (sqm) Private sector investment         

[NB Actuals and forecasts to be included following review of Q4 monitoring information]  

Growing Places Fund 

Launched in 2012, the £22.49m Growing Places Fund has supported the delivery of almost 30 projects and ‘pump priming’ activities, such as feasibility studies, through grant and loan funding support.  The programme is now largely complete with only two projects still in the delivery phase; the refurbishment of The Grand Hotel (Birmingham) – due for completion in [December 2020] ‐ and the Mezzanine Fund Programme (West Midlands‐wide). 

The £56m Mezzanine Fund Programme, managed by Frontier Development Capital, forms part of an evolving package to support SMEs across the region and create 5,800 jobs.  It is anticipated that the £10m Growing Places Fund investment will create 1,300 jobs within the GBSLEP area. 

The programme is expected to result in the creation or safeguarding of up to 4,875 jobs, 58,000sqm of commercial floorspace, 375 new homes and leverage in £76m of match funding.  With the programme drawing to a close, an impact evaluation will be commissioned in the year ahead to determine progress towards these outcomes and to understand what difference the LEP programme has made across the Greater Birmingham area. 

 

Page 152: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

18 

 

Strategic Activity 

Wider strategic activity for the LEP will focus on four key areas in 19/20, in three cases building on demonstrable successes in 18/19 and, in the fourth area, expanding our approach to engaging with local communities in delivering sustainable economic growth. 

Local Industrial Strategy Implementation 

In 18/19 the LEP committed significant resources, working with the Black Country LEP, Coventry & Warwickshire LEP and the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) in the development of a Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands. This included significant consultation with local and regional businesses, expansion of delivery plans to reflect (where applicable) a wider geographic focus and analysis of market opportunities and failures to be addressed to enable the growth of productivity across the West Midlands. 

As part of this strategy development, early discussions on implementation have taken place but in 19/20 we expect these discussions to accelerate and broaden with particular consideration given to i) the role of each LEP in driving forward key interventions across the West Midlands; ii) areas in which it makes sense for the WMCA to take the lead; iii) resources required to enable successful delivery and iv) approaches to ensuring a certain amount of delivery where there are significant resource constraints, particularly where there is no certainty over continuation, quanta or allocation of future funding for local growth activities. 

Stakeholder Engagement 

Detailed and extensive stakeholder engagement has been central to the development of both LEP delivery plans and the Local Industrial Strategy for the West Midlands.  However, much of this was carried out on a “task and finish” basis and in 19/20 we intend to formalise our extensive stakeholder engagement activities.  Key deliverables as part of this activity include: 

Formalise existing industry links by launching Industry Connect in Q1 19/20 with a series of events planned across the year.  This includes early engagement (Q2 19/20) in the development of delivery plans for 20/21 

Raising the profile and celebrating the impact of LEP‐led interventions through a series of events, celebrating LEP and partner successes and demonstrating to local businesses the impact that LEP‐led interventions have had on the local economy.  This will include roundtable events with Business Representative Organisations (BROs) throughout 19/20 and the LEP Annual Conference in Q3 19/20 

Increasing the visibility of LEP‐interventions through a series of thought‐leadership pieces in traditional and social media by Board Directors and senior officers with three pieces per quarter throughout 19/20 

Further increase the integration and alignment of GBSLEP and the Growth Hub communications, to enhance the reputation of the LEP as a credible delivery partner within the business community, in particular by developing an Advocacy group of companies who have seen substantial benefit from advice received through the Growth Hub service in Q3 19/20 

Page 153: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

 

19 

 

Meaningfully engage our young people ‐ the next generation of this region’s leaders ‐ in the next generation of the Greater Birmingham economy through our Future Economy initiative aimed at informing a planned Future Economy Delivery plan for 20/21, due to launch in Q3 19/20. 

Working with national agencies 

In 18/19 we worked successfully with national agencies to pilot regional programmes in Greater Birmingham.  Particularly notable was working with Be the Business on their Productivity Leadership Group Mentoring pilot, which is now being expanded on a wider geography as well as on a larger scale within Greater Birmingham.  We have also led the way in working with the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) on expanding the valuation and use of intellectual property amongst our companies.  IPO are now expanding this activity into other city regions. 

In 19/20, we intend to further develop our close working with national agencies.  Activities that we plan to undertake include working with Innovate UK and BEIS to explore the potential for a regional innovation scheme, under the auspices of the Local Industrial Strategy.  We have also begun to work with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) on how our leading work on towns and local centres can help them to deliver major national funding schemes including the Stronger Towns Fund and Future High Streets Fund. 

Working with community groups and social enterprises 

In 19/20, we plan to focus our engagement with wider society on community groups focused on regenerating their towns and local centres and social enterprises as key businesses for local growth.  As part of our towns and local centres regeneration work, working closely with partners, we will support communities to be appropriately represented in the design and implementation of policies that affect their towns and local centres.  Some of this work has already started in places such as Lichfield and Sutton Coldfield and we will expand this over the year. 

Through the development of the Growth Hub, we will increase our focus on community businesses and ensure that there is dedicated support for social enterprises as a key part of our growth strategy ensuring that all of our communities contribute to and benefit from that growth. 

Conclusion 

We have an ambitious delivery plan for 19/20, which builds on our successes in 18/19 and develops new activity to help our economy grow and thrive.  New growth opportunities are also likely to emerge which this delivery plan does not foresee and we will embrace them fully.  Along with all LEPs, we continue to operate in an uncertain economic and public funding environment.  Increased certainty in both will enable us to deliver much more this year and in future years.  However, we are confident that our planned interventions will continue to have a positive impact on the Greater Birmingham and Solihull economy. 

 

Page 154: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 13

25 April 2019 1 of 3

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP BOARD

25 April 2019

GBSLEP FINANCE REPORT – 2019/20 BUDGET

Recommendation The LEP Board is recommended to:

1. Review and approve the Operational Budget proposals for the 2019/20 financial year, noting the key issues set out below.

2. Agree to allocate a maximum of £300,139 of funding from the Business Rates Pool (BRP) to support budgeted expenditure (see para 6).

Background 3. The operational income and expenditure budget for 2019/20 at Appendix A has

been prepared based on the Medium Term Financial Plan agreed by the Board in July 2018, the budget figures used for 2018/19, the latest forecast outturn for 2018/19 and taking account of predicted changes to the LEP’s income streams and proposed interventions as detailed in the annual Delivery Plan (see previous item on the Board agenda). Appendix A is a high-level summary of the budget. More detail is available for Directors as required.

Key Issues Budget expenditure

4. Budget expenditure for the 12-month period ending 31 March 2020 is set at £5,893,828 (2018/19 Budget £4,698,853; forecast outturn £3,889,513).

5. The increase in budget expenditure of £2,004,315, compared to the 2018/19 forecast outturn is in five key areas:

• Revenue Projects (£1,378,871 increase) – the increase to £3.0m reflects increased confidence of the team and the organisation that additional projects to support the delivery of the Strategic Economic Plan (SEP) and preparatory work for the implementation of the Local Industrial Strategy, can be developed and delivered; this expenditure will be met through the Business Rates Pool; further detail on the proposed interventions can be found in the annual Delivery Plan Board paper.

• Staff costs (£450,698 increase) – the increase is as a result of the following:

o The intention to appoint permanent staff in posts filled by interims last year (Head of Place, Delivery Director and Exec Officer Sectors)

o The intention to fill five roles that were vacant for most if not all of last year (Stakeholder Engagement Manager, Comms Assistant, Head of People, Exec Officer Place, Exec Officer Innovation)

Page 155: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 13

25 April 2019 2 of 3

o The proposed creation of a number of new roles to strengthen the Programme Management team to handle increased Enterprise Zone (EZ) and revenue projects (Project Champion, Programme Management Office (PMO) Contracts Officer, Apprentice) and new roles with the move to a new operating model (‘Chief Operating Officer’, Admin support and Head of Governance).

Most of these roles will start halfway through the budget year. Accordingly, interim/temporary staff costs will reduce year-on-year. These additional staff costs will be funded from this year’s and the prior years’ PMO costs recharge income and the LGF/GPF interest, with a small amount from Business Rates Pool. The roles are necessary to support the effective delivery of the Growth Programme and to ensure there is sufficient capacity and capability to develop and implement revenue projects to support the SEP. Further work will be undertaken as part of the refresh of the Medium Term Financial Plan to look at the ongoing sustainability of the structure.

• External resources, Consultants (£183,368 increase) – additional short-term, temporary consultancy resource is required this year over-and-above last year, such as on the Paradise Project, on funding application development, to provide prior years’ accounts advice and audits and to develop finance operations.

• Corporate contingency costs (£100,000 increase) – no contingency spend was required last year, but £100k has been included in the budget in case of further work required as a result of the implementation of the LEP Review recommendations, specifically those relating to geography.

• Partially offset by reduction in Future Operating Model costs (£7,590 decrease) – the revised date for the implementation of the new operating model means several costs have been deferred into 2019/20 including the new IT and systems (£50,000), legal and consultant costs (£80,000), with a provision for irrecoverable VAT (awaiting advice), although the total budget is slightly less than last year.

6. In order to fund this proposed expenditure, a maximum of £300,139 of Business Rates Pool funding is required. This includes the £100,000 of contingency funding which it is hoped will not be used and £144,960 for the FOM which, as previously reported, will need to be funded locally if the GBSLEP receives no Capacity Funding from Government due to the retention of overlaps. The remaining funding requested is to contribute towards some of the costs of new roles as the LEP moves to a new operating model and as identified above.

Budget income

7. Budget income for the 12-month period ending 31 March 2020 is set at £6,674,150 (2018/19 Budget £5,859,500; forecast outturn £5,324,738).

8. The increase in budget income of £1,349,412 compared to the 2018/19 forecast outturn is in four key areas:

Page 156: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 13

25 April 2019 3 of 3

• Business Rates Pool income (£1,411,712 increase) – the Pool is forecast by the local authority Finance Directors to be considerably larger for 2018/19 which is due to be paid in January 2020. Final figures will not be known until the audit has been completed, likely October 2019.

• Local Growth Fund (LGF) and Growing Places Fund (GPF) interest (£201,000 increase) – the LEP has not received the full interest earned on these capital funds before; in prior years BCC added the interest to the capital balance; given recent advice has confirmed that Corporation Tax is payable on this interest received, it is reasonable that the net interest should be included as operational revenue income; this treatment has yet to be agreed with Birmingham City Council (BCC)

• EZ PMO costs recharge income (£50,000 increase) - the LEP has not received income from EZ towards its PMO costs before but the intention is that the agreed approach used for recovering PMO costs from the LGF should also be applied to the EZ PMO costs; this treatment has yet to be agreed with BCC

• Partially offset by LGF PMO costs recharge income (£301,950 reduction) – the LEP’s charges to the LGF for the costs of the PMO will be for just one year, 2019/20, whereas the charge made last year was for 2018/19 and for prior years.

Conclusions 9. At the end of the budget year, the Executive is forecasting a year-end surplus of

£780,322.

10. Added to the forecast carry-forward position at the end of 2018/19 (£4,789,144), GBSLEP should end the 2019/20 year with a balance of £5,569,466.

11. With the ending of the BRP, and uncertainties over other future income streams, this balance should enable GBSLEP to continue delivering its agenda over the subsequent two years. Further work will be undertaken on this as part of the refresh of the Medium Term Financial Plan.

Prepared by: Katie Trout LEP Director

Contact: [email protected] / 07825 318250

Date Created: 15 April 2019

Appendices a. Operational Budget

Page 157: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

GBSLEP OPERATING BUDGET 2019-20 5TH DRAFT

Category/Subjective

2017/18

ACTUALS

2018/19

BUDGET

2018/19

FORECAST

OUTTURN

BUDGET

VARIANCE V

2018/19

BUDGET

BUDGET VARIANCE V

2018/19

FORECAST OUTTURN

EXPENDITURE £ £ £ £ Assumptions/Basis of budget calculation £ £

Staff 837,518 1,139,837 1,023,404 1,474,102

Existing staff, last year salaries + 2% inflation

New staff converting temps/interims to perms + adding in-house

comms/marketing + filling vacancies 334,265 450,698

External Resources - Interims/temps 177,536 330,403 176,743 104,000 Temps/interims reducing as converting to perms at half year -226,403 -72,743

External Resources - Consultants 123,257 333,000 310,312 493,680

Consultancy increased for Place, Paradise project, Delivery Plans, Finance

Manager 160,680 183,368

Communications & Marketing (External) 194,780 199,600 157,269 140,300

Reducing as bringing some in-house as perm staff, offset by web upgrade £31k

moved from Overheads -59,300 -16,969

Subscriptions 6,143 95,500 73,526 88,000

Increasing as two years of subs to Midlands Engine remain outstanding (GBSLEP

in discussion with ME over them) and whilst there has been no discussion on

subs for 19/20 it is prudent to budget for them -7,500 14,474

Overheads 202,116 323,800 327,580 301,786 Reducing as web upgrade £31k moved to Comms & Marketing -22,014 -25,794

Total Fixed Costs 1,541,350 2,422,140 2,068,834 2,601,868 179,728 533,034

Service Delivery - Revenue 660,339 1,759,499 1,668,129 3,047,000

Substantially more than last year reflecting increased confidence of

team/organisation and preparatory work for Local Industrial Strategy

implementation - see annual Delivery Plan 1,287,501 1,378,871

FUTURE OPERATING MODEL - Implementation - 250,000 152,550 144,960

Several FOM implementation costs deferred to 19/20 - ICT, HR and Finance

systems, Legal adviser, etc -105,040 -7,590

CORPORATE CONTINGENCY - 267,214 - 100,000 In case specific work is required on the LEP Review -167,214 100,000

Total Variable Costs 660,339 2,276,713 1,820,679 3,291,960 1,015,247 1,471,281

TOTAL REVENUE SPEND 2,201,689 4,698,853 3,889,513 5,893,828 1,194,975 2,004,315

INCOME £ £ £ £ Assumptions/Basis of budget calculation £ £

Core Funding 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 As previous years although not confirmed in writing yet 0 0

Growth Hub BEIS funding 512,500 512,500 512,500 512,500 As GH agreement with BEIS 0 0

ERDF TA funding 11,943 40,000 40,000 28,650

As application to ERDF; not confirmed yet; budget reduced to reflect that ERDF

programme is nearing its end so less Executive support required -11,350 -11,350

Business Rates Pool (BRP) 1,892,165 3,274,000 3,167,288 4,579,000

Latest forecast from Pool FDs; will be Oct/Nov before audited and final figure

known 1,305,000 1,411,712

LGF PM charge - 1,204,000 975,950 674,000 Latest forecast of PMO costs; 2018/19 claimed but not yet received -530,000 -301,950

GPF PM charge - 100,000 100,000 100,000

Full recovery of budgeted costs; Programme Director discussing with BCC best

way for LEP to recover GPF PM costs for 18/19 and 19/20 0 0

LGF + GPF Interest (net) 14,000 29,000 29,000 230,000

Assume LEP receives all interest from both funds, net of service charge and tax

this year; discussions to be held with BCC about transfer of prior years interest

to the LEP; previous years' budget figures have not included the full amount of

interest earned but will do so going forwards 201,000 201,000

LEP Review Capacity Funding - 200,000 - -

Funding not received for 18/19 and not included in 19/20 budget due to

ongoing discussions on overlaps -200,000 0

EZ PM charge - - - 50,000

Full recovery of budgeted costs; Programme Director discussing with BCC best

way for LEP to recover EZ PM costs 50,000 50,000

TOTAL REVENUE INCOME 2,930,608 5,859,500 5,324,738 6,674,150 814,650 1,349,412

NET REVENUE INCOME/(EXPENDITURE) 728,919 1,160,647 1,435,225 780,322

BROUGHT FORWARD 2,625,000 3,353,919 3,353,919 4,789,144

CARRY FORWARD 3,353,919 4,514,566 4,789,144 5,569,466

2019/20

BUDGET

15/04/201912:36 190415 GBSLEP Budget 2019_20 - By Category + Service + Income stream 2019_20 I&E SUMMARY

Page 158: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 15

15/04/2019 1 of 3

GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LEP BOARD MEETING

25th April 2019

STAKEHOLDER ENAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE

Recommendations

Board Directors are recommended to:

1. Note media coverage highlights for March

2. Note the progress in delivering the Stakeholder Engagement Plan and key highlights

3. Note the “Meet the Board” proposal

Background 4. At the January 2019 GBSLEP Board meeting, the Board considered and approved a

Stakeholder Engagement Plan, which outlined five key approaches to increasing stakeholder engagement and the key activities for 2019.

5. This report provides a progress update, highlighting key achievements and points to note since the last meeting.

Highlights from March 2019

Media coverage key statistics

6. 129 pieces of coverage featured the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership in March

7. Total audience reach: 7,474,778

8. Key tiles include Birmingham Post (print), Birmingham Mail (web), BusinessDesk (web) Express and Star (web) and Business Insider (web)

9. 112 of these stories were online and 17 were print

10. Media coverage in March increased by 158% compared to the previous month. Topics included: Ladder for Greater Birmingham; Next phase of £1.7m Longbridge station; Cabinet vote to free up land for new Kidderminster urban village; and revamp of Kidderminster Train Station.

Digital channels key statistics

11. Twitter:

Twitter followers, 6,190 (+32) Impressions, 28,000 (57%) Retweets, 44 (+214%) Likes, 46 (+92%)

Page 159: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 15

15/04/2019 2 of 3

12. LinkedIn:

LinkedIn followers, 1,336 (+3%) Impressions, 8,449 (+69%)

13. Newsletter:

Delivered to 1,202 Open rate, 24.9% (industry average 23.2%) Click rate, 5.2% (industry average 3.4%)

14. There was an increase across all areas for March’s Twitter and LinkedIn coverage.

Key activity around; TLC Framework; Apprenticeships Week; and Ladder for Greater Birmingham meant more content and thus increased statistics.

15. A change in the style of content has increased engagement, through the use of more hashtags, images and video content.

16. A full coverage book is available on request.

Launch of the Towns and Local Centres Framework

17. The Framework was successfully launched with a breakfast event at Lichfield Cathedral on 21 March, hosted by Simon Marks on behalf of GBSLEP. The event was attended by over 50 stakeholders from across the public and private sectors.

18. The launch received coverage across seven articles in the regional and trade media to date, 100% of which was positive. There were also high levels of engagement across social media posts, supported by video content from external speakers.

19. In particular, there was positive feedback received on content of presentations from external speakers. Insights from external presentations included the significant structural change being experienced in the retail sector, and reflection on potential new opportunities and solutions.

Industry Connect

20. One of the flagship actions in the Stakeholder Engagement Plan was to formalise linkages by launching Industry Connect – a dedicated forum to engage industry on targeted consultation, as well as an “open door” to receive industry input, ideas and feedback.

21. Industry Connect is now live, having been “soft launched” in March. To date, 30 individuals from across GBSLEP’s identified priority sectors have joined as members and are receiving our delivery plans for comment and discussion. Further invitations are being circulated to key stakeholders. It is anticipated that Industry Connect will have 50 members, with the intention to hold a welcome event in May 2019.

22. Whilst the initiative has only been launched recently, the Executive is confident that GBSLEP will be in a strong position to engage with industry as part of the refresh of delivery plans in Q2 2019/20.

Page 160: GREATER BIRMINGHAM AND SOLIHULL LOCAL ENTERPRISE ... · 5 13:45 LEP Executive Director’s Report Attached Katie Trout To note key strategy and delivery developments 6 13:50 LEP Board

Item 15

15/04/2019 3 of 3

Meet the Board 23. A key theme in the Stakeholder Engagement Plan is to build the visibility and

credibility of GBSLEP.

24. The GBSLEP Executive has for some time been running “Meet the Team” pieces in the monthly newsletter. These pieces, which are designed to be personal and light in tone, are consistently amongst the most-read pieces and generate a considerable number clicks, building stakeholders’ engagement with the team.

25. The Executive therefore proposes to extend this approach to the Board’s private sector Non-Executive Directors. The approach will remain personal, but will be designed to draw out Directors’ professional backgrounds, passions, highlights of their time at GBSLEP and priorities for the future.

26. The first Non-Executive Director profile will be Simon Marks. A schedule of future profiles will be created and convenient times arranged to undertake the short interviews.

27. It is anticipated that these pieces will drive further stakeholder engagement and will encourage potential partners to join Industry Connect.

Conclusion 28. This report provides an update on media coverage, and the progress of delivering the

Stakeholder Engagement Plan. The Board is asked to note and discuss the highlights, and proposed “Meet the Board” activity.

Report by: Katie Fulcher Stakeholder Engagement Manager

Contact: [email protected] Date Created: 01/04/2019