June 12, 2017

Corrected

GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT

UTILITIES COMMITTEE

REGULAR MEETING

Thursday, June 15, 2017 9:00 am

2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia

R E V I S E D A G E N D A1 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

1.1 June 15, 2017 Regular Meeting Agenda That the Utilities Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for June 15, 2017 as circulated.

2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES

2.1 May 18, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes

That the Utilities Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held May 18, 2017 as circulated.

3. DELEGATIONS

4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS

5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF

5.1 Regional Water Conservation Campaign – Phase 3 Update

Designated Speaker: Larina Lopez That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated June 6, 2017, titled “Regional Water Conservation Campaign – Phase 3 Update.”

1 Note: Recommendation is shown under each item, where applicable.

UC-1

Utilities Committee Regular Agenda June 15, 2017

Agenda Page 2 of 4

5.2 Water Shortage Response Plan Review Designated Speakers: Inder Singh and Nermine Tawfik That the GVWD Board: a) approve the revised Drinking Water Conservation Plan (formerly titled the Water

Shortage Response Plan), to take effect on November 1, 2017, as presented in the report dated June 7, 2017, titled “Water Shortage Response Plan Review”; and

b) approve the Drinking Water Conservation Plan Policy, as presented in the report.

5.3 Award of Contract Resulting from Tender No. 17-011: Installation of Braid Street Main No. 2 Designated Speakers: Roy Moulder and Goran Oljaca That the GVWD Board authorize: a) award of a contract in the amount up to $6,146,290 (exclusive of taxes) to

Sandpiper Contracting LLP resulting from Tender No. 17-011 for the installation of Braid Street Main No. 2; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract.

5.4 Award of Contract Resulting from RFP No. 17-034: Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South Designated Speakers: Roy Moulder and Goran Oljaca That the GVWD Board authorize: a) award of a contract in the amount up to $997,281 (exclusive of taxes) to CH2M

Hill Canada Limited for Phase A, Preliminary Design, resulting from RFP No. 17-034, Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract.

5.5 Award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project Designated Speakers: Roy Moulder and Murray Gant That the GVWD Board authorize: a) award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services, in the amount up to

$11,108,137 (exclusive of taxes) to the Phase A project consultant, Hatch Corporation, for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the required documentation.

5.6 Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures to April 30, 2017

Designated Speakers: Frank Huber and Mark Ferguson That the Utilities Committee receive for information the report dated May 19, 2017 titled “Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures to April 30, 2017”.

UC-2

Utilities Committee Regular Agenda June 15, 2017

Agenda Page 3 of 4

5.7 Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy Designated Speaker: Jeff Carmichael That the GVS&DD Board approve the Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy, which replaces the Sewer Heat Policy, as presented in the report dated June 1, 2017 and titled “Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy”.

5.8 Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street, Corporation of Delta Designated Speaker: Ed von Euw That the GVS&DD Board approve an amendment of the Fraser Sewerage Area to include properties located at the Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street, Delta as shown on District Drawings SA-2376 Sheets 91 and 92.

5.9 Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – 2919 and 2967 188th Street, Surrey Designated Speaker: Mark Wellman That the GVS&DD Board approve an amendment of the Fraser Sewerage Area to include the portions of the properties located at 2919 and 2967 188th Street, Surrey as shown on District Drawing SA-2376 Sheet 93.

5.10 Biennial Report - Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan Designated Speaker: Robert Hicks That the GVS&DD Board direct staff to: a) submit the Biennial Report 2015-2016, dated May 2017, to the Ministry of

Environment in accordance with the requirements of the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan; and

b) post the Biennial Report on the Metro Vancouver website and arrange for the Utilities Committee to receive comments and submissions on the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan progress, as described in the Biennial Report, at the September 14, 2017 meeting.

5.11 Managers’ Report

Designated Speakers: Tim Jervis and Fred Nenninger That the Utilities Committee receive for information the “Managers’ Report” dated June 6, 2017.

6. INFORMATION ITEMS 7. OTHER BUSINESS

8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS

UC-3

Utilities Committee Regular Agenda June 15, 2017

Agenda Page 4 of 4

9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING That the Utilities Committee close its regular meeting scheduled for June 15, 2017 pursuant to Community Charter provisions, Section 90(1) (e) as follows: “90 (1) A part of the meeting may be closed to the public if the subject matter being

considered relates to or is one of more of the following: (e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the

board or committee considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the regional district.”

10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION

That the Utilities Committee adjourn/conclude its regular meeting of June 15, 2017.

Membership: Mussatto, Darrell (C) – North Vancouver City Jordan, Colleen (VC) - Burnaby Becker, John – Pitt Meadows Clay, Mike – Port Moody Fox, Charlie – Langley Township

Gambioli, Nora –West Vancouver Hicks, Robin – North Vancouver District Johnstone, Patrick – New Westminster McDonald, Bruce – Delta

Speirs, Craig – Maple Ridge Stevenson, Tim – Vancouver Steves, Harold - Richmond Woods, Dave – Surrey

UC-4

METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT UTILITIES COMMITTEE

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Metro Vancouver Regional District (MVRD) Utilities Committee held at 9:02 a.m. on Thursday, May 18, 2017 in the 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Mayor Darrell Mussatto, North Vancouver City Vice Chair, Councillor Colleen Jordan, Burnaby Councillor Charlie Fox, Langley Township Councillor Nora Gambioli, West Vancouver Councillor Robin Hicks, North Vancouver District Councillor Patrick Johnstone, New Westminster Councillor Bruce McDonald, Delta Councillor Craig Speirs, Maple Ridge Councillor Tim Stevenson, Vancouver (arrived at 9:06 a.m.) Councillor Harold Steves, Richmond Councillor Dave Woods, Surrey MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor John Becker, Pitt Meadows Mayor Mike Clay, Port Moody STAFF PRESENT: Tim Jervis, General Manager, Water Services Fred Nenninger, Acting General Manager Liquid Waste Services Carol Mason, Chief Administrative Officer Agata Kosinski, Assistant to Regional Committees, Board and Information Services 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

1.1 May 18, 2017 Regular Meeting Agenda It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Utilities Committee adopt the agenda for its regular meeting scheduled for May 18, 2017 as circulated.

CARRIED

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Utilities Committee held on Thursday, May 18, 2017 Page 1 of 6

UC-5

2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 2.1 April 6, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes

It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Utilities Committee adopt the minutes of its regular meeting held April 6, 2017 as circulated.

CARRIED

3. DELEGATIONS No items presented.

4. INVITED PRESENTATIONS No items presented.

5. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE OR STAFF

5.1 2017 Water Wagon Schedule Report dated April 21, 2017, from Larina Lopez, Division Manager, Corporate Communications, External Relations, providing the GVWD Board with the preliminary 2017 event schedule for Metro Vancouver’s Water Wagon. On-table replacement page for the April 21, 2017 report titled “2017 Water Wagon Schedule” was provided and is retained with the May 18, 2017 Utilities Committee Agenda package. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated April 21, 2017, titled “2017 Water Wagon Schedule.”

CARRIED

5.2 Seymour Salmonid Society - Contribution Agreement Report dated April 10, 2017, from Mike Mayers, Division Manager, Watershed Operations and Protection, Water Services, seeking Board authorization for renewal of the Contribution Agreement with the Seymour Salmonid Society for a three-year term. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVWD Board approve the renewal of the Contribution Agreement between the Greater Vancouver Water District and the Seymour Salmonid Society for a three-year term, and annual contribution amount of $125,000, commencing on January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2020.

CARRIED

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Utilities Committee held on Thursday, May 18, 2017 Page 2 of 6

UC-6

5.3 BC Hydro Capilano Watershed Pole Replacement Project Report dated April 10, 2017, from Jesse Montgomery, Program Manager, Environmental Management, Water Services, providing the Committee and Board with information on a BC Hydro utility pole replacement project within their statutory right-of-way through the Capilano Watershed. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated April 10, 2017 titled “BC Hydro Capilano Watershed Pole Replacement Project.”

CARRIED

5.4 Award of Contract Resulting from RFP No. 17-049: Supply and Delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite Report dated April 24, 2017, from Roy Moulder, Division Manager, Purchasing and Risk Management, Financial Services, and Marilyn Towill, Director, Operations and Maintenance, Water Services, advising the GVWD Board of the results of the Request for Proposal RFP No. 17-049 Supply and Delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite, and recommending award of the contract in the amount up to $8,628,000 (exclusive of taxes) to Brenntag Canada Inc. In response to questions, members were informed about the previous and current proponent, the origin of the sodium hypochlorite, and its multi-use application.

9:06 a.m. Councillor Stevenson arrived at the meeting. On-table replacement page for the April 24, 2017 report titled “Award of Contract Resulting from RFP No. 17-049: Supply and Delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite” was provided and is retained with the May 18, 2017 Utilities Committee Agenda package. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVWD Board authorize: a) The award of a contract in the amount up to $8,628,000 (exclusive of taxes)

to Brenntag Canada Inc. resulting from RFP No. 17-049 for Supply and Delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite; and

b) The Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract. CARRIED

5.5 Award of Project Management Support Services: Phase 2 – Detailed Design for

Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant Stage 5 Expansion Project Report dated May 4, 2017, from Roy Moulder, Division Manager, Purchasing and Risk Management, Financial Services and Jeff Chan, Division Manager, Project Delivery, Liquid Waste Services, seeking Board authorization to award Project Management Support Services: Phase 2 - Detailed Design, in the amount up to $2,576,205 (exclusive of taxes) to AECOM Canada Ltd., for the Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant Stage 5 Expansion Project.

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Utilities Committee held on Thursday, May 18, 2017 Page 3 of 6

UC-7

It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVS&DD Board authorize: a) Award of Project Management Support Services: Phase 2 - Detailed Design,

in the amount up to $2,576,205 (exclusive of taxes) to AECOM Canada Ltd., for the Annacis Island Wastewater Treatment Plant Stage 5 Expansion Project; and

b) The Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the required documentation.

CARRIED

5.6 Iona Island Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant – Project Definition Phase Report dated April 18, 2017, from Fred Nenninger, Director, Policy, Planning and Analysis, Liquid Waste Services, updating the GVS&DD Board on the work plan for the Project Definition Phase for the upgrade of the Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Plant to secondary level treatment. Staff provided a presentation on the Iona Island Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant project, outlining regulatory drivers; project objectives; land tenures; project phases and timeline; design process; consultation objectives; and deliverables. Presentation material titled “Iona Island Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant: Project Definition Phase” is retained with the May 18, 2017 Utilities Committee agenda. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVS&DD Board receive for information the report dated April 18, 2017, titled “Iona Island Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant – Project Definition Phase”.

CARRIED

5.7 Region-wide Baseline for On-site Stormwater Management Report dated April 19, 2017, from Fred Nenninger, Director, Policy Planning and Analysis, Liquid Waste Services, seeking Board approval for the region-wide baseline criteria for on-site stormwater management, and support for its GVS&DD members’ stormwater action (1.1.20), as identified in the GVS&DD Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan (ILWRMP). Staff provided a presentation on the region-wide Baseline for onsite stormwater management. The presentation outlined the background context of stormwater management mitigating impacts; Integrated Liquid Waste Resource Management Plan including the Baseline; consultation and collaboration with municipal staff; defining unmitigated runoff versus mitigated runoff; and the final Baseline recommendations.

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Utilities Committee held on Thursday, May 18, 2017 Page 4 of 6

UC-8

In response to questions, members were informed about consideration of other stormwater management techniques, explanation of municipal responsibilities for stormwater management, the pending release of the Biennial Progress Report next month, and the benefits of a region-wide approach of the Baseline. Presentation material titled “Region-wide Baseline for Onsite Stormwater Management” is retained with the May 18, 2017 Utilities Committee agenda. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVS&DD Board approve the Region-wide Baseline Criteria and Suggested Practices presented in the report dated April 19, 2017, titled “Region-wide Baseline for On-site Stormwater Management”, for use by GVS&DD members.

CARRIED

5.8 Liquid Waste Services Environmental Management and Monitoring Initiatives Report dated April 18, 2017, from Andjela Knezevic-Stevanovic, Director, Environmental Management and Quality Control, Liquid Waste Services, providing the Utilities Committee and GVS&DD Board with an overview of the environmental programs and initiatives that are performed by the GVS&DD to assess environmental performance of the liquid waste utility and proactively address changing regulatory requirements. Staff provided a presentation to the Committee on the Liquid Waste Services environmental management and monitoring initiatives. The presentation outlined the types of tests utilized; the results found; work undertaken to determine fish and crab health assessments; modeling, simulations, forecasting and risk assessments; and details on special studies and development of new tools and measurement methods. Presentation material titled “Environmental Programs & Initiatives: Liquid Waste Services” is retained with the May 18, 2017 Utilities Committee agenda. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the GVS&DD Board receive for information the report dated April 18, 2017 titled “Liquid Waste Services Environmental Management and Monitoring Initiatives”.

CARRIED

5.9 Managers’ Report Report dated May 5, 2017, from Tim Jervis, General Manager, Water Services, and Fred Nenninger, Acting General Manager, Liquid Waste Services, updating the Committee on the 2017 Work Plan. It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Utilities Committee receive for information the “Managers’ Report” dated May 5, 2017.

CARRIED

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Utilities Committee held on Thursday, May 18, 2017 Page 5 of 6

UC-9

6. INFORMATION ITEMS No items presented.

7. OTHER BUSINESS No items presented.

8. BUSINESS ARISING FROM DELEGATIONS No items presented.

9. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Utilities Committee close its regular meeting scheduled for May 18, 2017 pursuant to the Community Charter provisions, Section 90 (1)(e),(g) and (2)(b) as follows: “90(1) A part of the meeting may be closed to the public if the subject matter being

considered relates to or is one or more of the following: (e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if

the board or committee considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the regional district;

(g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the regional district; and 90 (2) A part of a meeting must be closed to the public if the subject matter being

considered relates to one or more of the following: (b) the consideration of information received and held in confidence

relating to negotiations between the regional district and a provincial government or the federal government or both and a third party.”

CARRIED 10. ADJOURNMENT/CONCLUSION

It was MOVED and SECONDED That the Utilities Committee adjourn its regular meeting of May 18, 2017.

CARRIED (Time: 10:35 a.m.)

____________________________ ____________________________ Agata Kosinski, Darrell Mussatto, Chair Assistant to Regional Committees 21643899 FINAL

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MVRD Utilities Committee held on Thursday, May 18, 2017 Page 6 of 6

UC 9-1

5.1

To: Utilities Committee From: Larina Lopez, Division Manager, Corporate Communications, External Relations

Department Date: June 6, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Regional Water Conservation Campaign – Phase 3 Update RECOMMENDATION That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated June 6, 2017, titled “Regional Water Conservation Campaign – Phase 3 Update.” PURPOSE To provide the GVWD Board with an update on the third phase of Metro Vancouver’s regional water conservation campaign, We Love Water. BACKGROUND The We Love Water campaign was developed and introduced in the Metro Vancouver region in 2016. Campaign materials are shared with Members, and are visible throughout the region during summer and fall. Staff provided an update on 2017 campaign planning in April 2017. At that time, updated campaign imagery and messaging were in development. This report provides an update on 2017 campaign imagery, as well as a description of where the campaign will be seen and heard throughout the region. REGIONAL WATER CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN – PHASE 3 UPDATE The 2017 campaign is promoted in three phases, all under the We Love Water banner. Phase 1 - the waterwise lawn care component, launched February 2017; phase 2 - regional lawn watering regulations, launched May 15, 2017; and phase 3 - the broader drinking water conservation campaign, is in market from mid-June through September 2017. For phase 3 of the 2017 campaign, existing campaign creative has been refined and media outreach expanded to include television, radio, online advertising, and boosted posts on social media. The campaign will be:

• Visible on Global BC television, leveraging on-air personalities including popular media meteorologists Kristi Gordon and Mark Madryga, as well as sponsored weather updates on BC1 (Global’s 24hr news channel);

• Heard on radio during busy drive times, both introduced into morning banter by hosts, and as a sponsor to the weather forecasts on CKNW, CFOX, ROCK 101, AM730. Ms. Gordon is also the meteorologist on some of these radio channels which provides additional leverage and consistency of messaging;

• Visible on digital media, using weather-triggered scheduling to activate online advertising that targets car and home owners likely involved in maintenance behaviours that require water use; and

UC-10

Regional Water Conservation Campaign – Phase 3 Update Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 3

• Shared on social media via imagery and video, including a promotional initiative called We Love Water Wednesdays where participants submit their own water-saving habits. Media partners and spokespeople will also participate by posting tips to their Facebook and Twitter accounts.

A new campaign feature in 2017 is the use of weather-related triggers to activate media, creating added relevance for the message. The frequency of the campaign’s media activity will increase when the forecast is calling for warm, dry conditions, with the initial triggers set at four days predicted dryness and temperature forecast of 23 degrees. To build on past public recognition, the campaign will continue to use the tag line Use a little less; care a little more, the We Heart Water logo, and the welovewater.ca URL. New Components in Development for 2018 Looking ahead, a new campaign component is already in development for 2018, with a potential soft introduction in late-summer 2017. This imagery and messaging speaks to the source and quality of Metro Vancouver’s drinking water. One of the images (“It’s All Drinkable”) is currently in focus group testing and included in this report as a preview of the introduction of these concepts to the campaign. A finding in the public opinion research is that many residents, and in particular those that do not value water conservation as highly as others, are unclear on where their water comes from. This group is also largely unaware of the treatment, testing and monitoring processes that make what can feel like ubiquitous rain water into the drinking water we want to use wisely. Materials for Members All the social media assets are provided to Members for local Twitter and Facebook feeds. As well, the artwork is provided to be used in public facilities. In 2016, Members used the campaign materials for transit shelter advertising, recreation centre shower facilities and as building window artwork. Similar opportunities exist in 2017, with Members using campaign imagery for interior and exterior building signage and billboards. Metro Vancouver’s approach to water conservation campaigns is to consistently rely on fact-based, tested messaging and new elements will continue to meet this criteria. In future years, the campaign will continue to build on the We Love Water logo, a strong social media presence, and developing information that is identified through public response and research. Images for the 2017 campaign can be found in Attachment 1. ALTERNATIVES This is an information report. No alternatives are presented. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The 2017 Regional Water Conservation Campaign has a budget of $270,000. These costs are included in the 2017 Water Services Communications Program Budget managed by the External Relations Department.

UC-11

Regional Water Conservation Campaign – Phase 3 Update Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 3 of 3

SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The 2017 regional water conservation campaign is promoted in three phases, all under the We Love Water banner. Phase 3 of the campaign focusses on the broader drinking water conservation campaign and is in market from mid-June through September 2017. Phase 3 of the 2017 campaign includes refined creative and expanded media outreach including a robust presence on Global BC television with popular media meteorologists Kristi Gordon and Mark Madryga, sponsored weather updates on BC1 (Global’s 24hr news channel) and on-air weather forecasts on CKNW, CFOX, ROCK 101, and AM730, digital media, using weather-triggered scheduling, and social media via imagery and video, including a promotional initiative called We Love Water Wednesdays. New developments for 2018 include new source and quality campaign components. All materials continue to be research and fact-based, tested and made available to Members. Attachment 1. 2017/2018 We Love Water Conservation Campaign Creative

UC-12

ATTACHMENT 1

UC-13

Poster and social media advertising

DRAFT

UC-14

Online banner advertising

UC-15

5.2

To: Utilities Committee From: Inder Singh, Director, Policy, Planning and Analysis, Water Services Nermine Tawfik, Policy Coordinator, Public Involvement, Water Services Date: June 7, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Water Shortage Response Plan Review RECOMMENDATION That the GVWD Board: a) approve the revised Drinking Water Conservation Plan (formerly titled the Water Shortage

Response Plan), to take effect on November 1, 2017, as presented in the report dated June 7, 2017, titled “Water Shortage Response Plan Review”; and

b) approve the Drinking Water Conservation Plan Policy, as presented in the report. PURPOSE To provide the Board with a summary of the consultation on the proposed amendments to the Water Shortage Response Plan (WSRP), the final proposed amendments to the Plan, the revised Plan, and a supporting Board Policy. BACKGROUND At its meeting of November 25, 2016, the Board considered a series of proposed amendments to the Water Shortage Response Plan and adopted the following resolution:

That the GVWD Board: a) Receive for information the report titled “Water Shortage Response Plan Review –

Update”, dated November 10, 2016; and b) Direct staff to consult on the proposed changes to the Water Shortage Response

Plan.

Staff conducted the consultation during the period from December 2016 to January 2017 and amended the WSRP according the feedback received from stakeholders. This report concludes the activities of the WSRP review and update process and is being brought forward at this time to ensure local government councils have adequate time to adopt and implement the Plan ahead of the 2018 season. In 2015, staff was directed by the Board to undertake a two phase review and update of the WSRP following an exceptionally dry and hot summer during which Stage 3 restrictions were implemented. Phase 1 consultation was conducted during the period from November 2015 to February 2016 to receive input from local governments, the private sector, and the public on impacts. The Board approved three amendments to the WSRP to mitigate these concerns ahead of Summer 2016. This report summarizes the consultation process, feedback received from stakeholders, and the final proposed amendments to the WSRP. It includes a revised Plan that has been developed incorporating

UC-16

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 8

the changes and feedback received from stakeholders throughout the entire WSRP review process. A new Board Policy describing the GVWD Commissioner’s decision-making process for activating and deactivating stages in the Drinking Water Conservation Plan, and the implementation process for local governments is also included for the Board’s consideration. CONSULTATION RESULTS The purpose of the consultation process was to receive feedback from local governments, the private sector, and the public on seven proposed amendments to the WSRP.

During the consultation, Metro Vancouver held workshops, public dialogues, and conducted an online survey to gather feedback from all stakeholder groups. The consultation activities are summarized as follows:

• A local government workshop was held in December 2016 and was attended by 40 local government staff including members of the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee (REAC), REAC Water Subcommittee, Municipal Water Conservation Coordinators and other staff involved in administering aspects of the WSRP;

• Eight feedback forms were received from local governments; • Three private sector workshops were held in January 2017 and were attended by 35

participants, representing the following eight sectors: commercial cleaning (pressure washing, window cleaning), golf, turf farm, landscape and nursery, irrigation, commercial car washing, public and private school districts, and Chambers of Commerce;

• Four regional public dialogues were held in January 2017 and were attended by 135 members of the public and business representatives. The Utilities Committee Chair attended all four dialogues and provided opening remarks, moderated the discussion, and heard directly from attendees on the proposed changes to the WSRP; and

• Online survey was posted on the Metro Vancouver website. Metro Vancouver received 371 completed surveys; 336 from the public and 35 from private sector respondents.

Summary of Feedback Received, Additional Research, and Final Proposed Amendments All proposed amendments were generally supported by the stakeholders; however, there was varying degrees of support for each. Suggestions were made to adjust some of the amendments to mitigate potential adverse impacts and provide more clarity. Based on feedback received through the consultation process, staff conducted additional research and analysis in the areas of playing fields and commercial vehicle washing in order to further refine the proposed amendments. The restrictions around soil-based and sand-based playing fields have been developed through consultation with representatives from the Educational Facility Managers Association of BC which represents school districts in the Province and with irrigation and turf experts. The commercial vehicle wash restrictions have been developed through consultation with the Canadian Car Wash Association and Canadian car wash equipment suppliers.

UC-17

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 3 of 8

Consultation feedback on the seven amendments together with the final proposed amendments are summarized in the following tables:

Item No. 1 Stage 1 activation period Current WSRP May 15 to October 15 Amendment Amend the activation period for Stage 1 from May 15 - October 15 to

May 1 – October 15 Feedback Local governments expressed a varied level of support for this change. Some were

concerned that on May 1 there is still substantial rainfall and residents might be confused about the need to conserve. One local government suggested that Metro Vancouver should strengthen and widely communicate the message about the need to conserve water and the rationale for starting Stage 1 on an earlier date.

The private sector and public (61% of respondents to the online survey) were generally supportive of this change because of its potential to delay or avoid moving to higher stages during a hot and dry spring or summer. The landscape and nursery sector did not support the change because of impacts on spring landscape maintenance work, which requires more frequent watering for plants and lawns to be established. Some of the public who did not support the change felt that that an early start should be dependent on weather patterns and not be implemented automatically each year.

Final proposed amendment

Stage 1 Activation period: May 1 to October 15

Item No. 2 Lawn watering Current WSRP Three mornings per week in Stage 1 Amendment Reduce from three mornings per week to two mornings per week in Stage 1 Feedback Local governments were very supportive of this change given the potential to conserve

water during the high demand season.

However, the private sector expressed concerns about the potential decline of lawn health by reducing the allowable watering times. Several respondents noted the reduction in allowable lawn watering days could cause people to over-water on the permitted days, triggered by a possible response to make up for the lost watering opportunity.

The public was generally supportive (63% of survey respondents), but several respondents were concerned that the lawn watering hours are too strict. They requested that watering be permitted during one evening, or allow extended morning hours.

Final proposed amendment

Stage 1: Lawn watering two mornings per week

Item No. 3 Watering flowers, vegetables, planters, shrubs and trees Current WSRP No restrictions in Stages 1 and 2 Amendment Restrict watering of flowers, planters, shrubs and trees (using a sprinkler) to WSRP

prescribed lawn watering hours, on any day, in Stages 1 and 2

UC-18

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 4 of 8

Feedback While local governments are generally supportive of this change, certain conditions were recommended to improve or clarify the restriction. One local government suggested that they be allowed to operate under a water management plan during Stages 1 to 3 to allow flexibility in irrigation practices to protect municipal gardens, shrubs, and trees. Another local government recommended Metro Vancouver encourage drip irrigation over using sprinklers to reduce water lost to evaporation.

The private sector raised concerns that trees, shrubs, and flowers have different watering needs than lawns, particularly younger plantings, so watering should not be restricted in Stage 1. Several respondents suggested watering goals would be better served with increased education related to the correct way to water rather than time restrictions.

The public was also generally supportive (61% of survey respondents), but raised concerns that shifting to a mornings-only schedule is not convenient and that an evening time should be kept to accommodate this need. Some people were concerned that hand-watering is not manageable for some seniors, or for homes on big lots given the size of the planted areas.

Final proposed amendment

Stages 1 and 2: Watering flowers, shrubs, and trees excluding edible plants: - On any day from 4 am to 9 am for residential users and 1 am to 9 am for non-

residential and governments/schools/parks users, if using a sprinkler - On any day at any time if using a handheld hose, soaker hose, water container, or

drip irrigation

Item No. 4 Watering school yards, sports and sand-based playing fields Current WSRP No restrictions in Stages 1, 2 and 3 Amendment Restrict watering to 7:00 pm – 9:00 am in Stages 1, 2 and 3, unless operating under an

approved local government water management plan Feedback All stakeholders (including 67% of public responses to the online survey) were in

support of this change; however, local governments, school districts, and turf and irrigation professionals indicated that sand-based playing fields have different watering requirements than other types of playing fields. It was noted that these fields require frequent and shallow irrigation due to their high drainage capability and inability to hold moisture. Therefore, restricting watering of fields to a reduced number of days in Stages 2 and 3 could result in loss of the turf.

Feedback suggested that sand-based fields should have their own classification and specific restrictions, and that signage be created to educate residents about the unique needs and value of sand-based fields to address public criticism when the fields are watered outside of the regular lawn watering hours.

It was also noted that school yards don’t have similar watering requirements as sports fields and that they should not be grouped with playing fields in this category.

Final proposed amendment

Watering of soil-based playing fields: Stage 1: On any day between 7 pm to 9 am, except if:

- Watering newly over-seeded fields if in compliance with a local government permit

- Operating under an approved local government water management plan UC-19

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 5 of 8

Stage 2: No more than 4 days in a 7-day period between 7 pm to 9 am with the same exceptions as in Stage 1 Stage 3: No more than 3 days in a 7-day period between 7 pm to 9 am with the same exceptions as in Stage 1

Watering of sand-based playing fields: Stages 1 and 2: On any day between 7 pm to 9 am, except if:

- Watering newly over-seeded fields if in compliance with a local government permit

- Operating under an approved local government water management plan Stage 3: No more than 5 days in a 7-day period between 7 pm to 9 am with the same exceptions as in Stage 1

Item No. 5 Watering golf courses Current WSRP Stage 2: Golf courses may water greens and tee areas normally; fairways may only be

watered once weekly Stage 3: Golf courses may water greens and tee areas at minimum levels required to maintain areas in usable condition; fairways may not be watered

Amendment Allow golf courses operating under a local government approved water management plan an exemption from the regional WSRP watering restrictions in Stages 2 and 3

Feedback There was strong support for this proposed amendment by all stakeholders (including 61% of public responses to the online survey) on the condition that the water management plans result in an overall reduction in water use. Local governments expressed concern about the increased administrative burden to manage those plans. The golf sector, which was supportive of the change, also expressed the same concern that local governments might not prefer this option because of the increased administrative requirements to manage these plans.

It was suggested by both local governments and the golf sector that Metro Vancouver set regional water use targets for golf courses for each WSRP Stage and to also develop model water management plans.

Final proposed amendment

Stage 2: Fairway watering 1 day in a 7-day period except if operating under an approved local government water management plan Stage 3: Fairway watering prohibited except if operating under an approved local government water management plan

Item No. 6 Commercial car washing Current WSRP No restrictions in Stage 3 Amendment Restrict commercial car washing to automatic systems that recirculate water, or

high-pressure wand facilities in Stage 3 Feedback Local governments had varied levels of support for this change, expressing concerns

regarding enforcement of the restriction that would require them to track and monitor all car wash businesses. Also, some were concerned about the potential financial burden on existing car washes which might have to shut down in Stage 3. However,

UC-20

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 6 of 8

several acknowledged that this restriction could encourage water efficiency in the commercial car wash sector.

The commercial car wash sector was receptive of the proposed change and acknowledged the need to conserve water. They proposed that the restriction be phased in to allow businesses time to update their equipment. They suggested that existing car washes that cannot upgrade their systems be required to limit the services they offer in Stage 3 to ‘basic wash’ only. A basic wash uses the least amount of water per vehicle wash. Facilities built after the Plan is approved could be required to have a recirculation system if they wish to keep operating in Stage 3.

Final proposed amendment

Stage 3: Commercial vehicle washing prohibited except for: - A facility that installed an automatic vehicle wash system before November 1,

2017, is operating on a basic wash and rinse cycle only - A facility that installed an automatic vehicle wash system after November 1,

2017, is operating using a water recycling system that achieves a minimum 60% water recovery rate over the full wash cycle

- A hand wash and self-service facility, is operating using high-pressure wands or brushes that achieve a maximum flow rate of 11.4 litres per minute

Item No. 7 Topping up or filling pools, spas and garden ponds Current WSRP Prohibited in Stage 3

Amendment Allow the topping up or filling of hotel, residential strata, and private club pools and hot tubs, with a valid operating permit under the BC Pool Regulation, in Stage 3

Feedback This change was highly supported by local governments and the private sector, and received average support from the general public (51% of survey respondents).

Public respondents were concerned that allowing a non-essential water use during a drought sends the wrong message about water conservation. It was also suggested that topping-up be limited to pools that employ practices for conserving water, such as using pool covers. Many people commented that hot tubs seem to be unnecessary during hot weather and questioned why they would be able to continue to operate.

Final proposed amendment

Stage 3: Topping-up or filling of pools and hot tubs is prohibited except for pools and hot tubs with a permit to operate in accordance with health authorities having jurisdiction over pool and hot tub regulation.

REVISED PLAN NAME The WSRP has been revised to address many concerns and issues raised during the consultation process with local government staff, private sector representatives, and the public. The original name of the Plan has raised concern that it does not reflect its purpose which encompasses restricting water use due to different circumstances. Stage 1 is activated on a routine basis to conserve water and reduce high seasonal demands to ensure sufficient storage and efficient transmission of the water. Stages 2 and 3 are activated to conserve water during droughts or shortages. Stage 4 is activated during an emergency. It is proposed the name of the WSRP be changed to “Drinking Water Conservation Plan” (DWCP) to better reflect the purpose and desired outcomes which are to conserve water in response to different

UC-21

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 7 of 8

circumstances. The proposed name may also help to promote behavior change with respect to water conservation and raise awareness that the Plan refers to treated drinking water. This name change also supports the Board Strategic Plan action 3.2 to “Promote water conservation through public education campaigns and other tools”. The revised WSRP now titled Drinking Water Conservation Plan (DWCP) also includes new sections on water conservation, year-round conservation measures, the process for activating stages of the Plan, monitoring and enforcement, and a glossary of terms (Attachment 1). DRINKING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN POLICY The Drinking Water Conservation Plan Policy (Attachment 2) outlines the process for conserving GVWD supplied drinking water during periods of high demand, during shortages and emergencies and describes the following:

• The GVWD Commissioner’s decision-making process for activating and deactivating Stages in the DWCP; and

• The implementation process for local governments. NEXT STEPS The proposed next steps in implementing the updated WSRP include the following:

• Work with local government staff on revisions to bylaws, including the development of a model bylaw and template for water management plans;

• Local government councils to adopt the revised Plan into bylaws to take effect November 1, 2017 (following the end of Stage 1 under the current WSRP);

• Coordinate best management practices for enforcement and fines associated with the updated Plan to promote better consistency across the region (as recommended by the Regional Administrators Advisory Committee during its May 25, 2017 meeting); and

• Implement Stage 1 of the updated Plan on May 1, 2018. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVWD Board:

a) approve the revised Drinking Water Conservation Plan (formerly titled the Water Shortage Response Plan), to take effect on November 1, 2017, as presented in the report dated June 7, 2017, titled “Water Shortage Response Plan Review”; and

b) approve the Drinking Water Conservation Plan Policy, as presented in the report. 2. That the GVWD Board receive for information the report dated June 7, 2017, titled “Water

Shortage Response Plan Review” and provide alternate direction to staff. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS If the Board approves Alternative 1, the budget and staff resources needed to assist local governments with adopting the revised WSRP (now titled DWCP) into bylaws and communicating the new plan to stakeholders are included in the 2017 Water Services budget under the Utility Policy & Planning and Public Involvement programs. The proposed revisions to the WSRP are estimated to reduce summer water demand and GVWD summer water sales by about 3.5 - 6.1 billion litres (BL). Based on current seasonal pricing for wholesale water sales, about $2.6 - $4.5 million less in annual revenue would be generated as a result

UC-22

Water Shortage Response Plan Review Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 8 of 8

of the proposed revisions to the WSRP. Over the long term, this could be offset by savings in debt servicing associated with deferral of capital expenditures on new water infrastructure projects. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Metro Vancouver started a process to review and update the Water Shortage Response Plan in November 2015. The process included two phases of consultation and a comprehensive technical review. This report concludes the final activities of that process and summarizes the feedback received during the final phase of consultation on a series of proposed amendments to the Water Shortage Response Plan (WSRP). All proposed amendments were generally supported by stakeholders; however, suggestions were made to adjust some of the amendments to mitigate potential adverse impacts and provide more clarity. The revised WSRP now titled Drinking Water Conservation Plan (DWCP) and a GVWD Board Policy to support the GVWD Commissioner’s administration of the DWCP are presented in this report. The proposed amendments to the Plan were reviewed with, and endorsed by, both RAAC and REAC at their meetings on May 25, 2017 and June 2, 2017, respectively. If Alternative 1 is approved by the Board, local governments will be requested to make the corresponding changes to their bylaws between November 1, 2017 and May 1, 2018 so that the new DWCP is implemented by all jurisdictions in summer 2018. Attachments 1. Drinking Water Conservation Plan 2. Drinking Water Conservation Plan Policy

21633610

UC-23

UC-24

UC-25

UC-26

UC-27

UC-28

UC-29

UC-30

UC-31

UC-32

UC-33

UC-34

UC-35

UC-36

UC-37

UC-38

UC-39

UC-40

UC-41

UC-42

UC-43

21153865 Drinking Water Conservation Plan Policy Page 1 of 2

Attachment 2

DRINKING WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Effective Date: Approved By: GVWD Board

PURPOSE

To outline the process for determining the activation and deactivation of drinking water conservation stages in the DWCP, in conjunction with the Drinking Water Conservation Plan (DWCP). This policy applies to the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) and its members. POLICY

The GVWD is the regional authority that, through its local government members, supplies drinking water to users across the Metro Vancouver region in a safe, reliable, and efficient manner as authorized under the provincial statute, An Act to Incorporate the Greater Vancouver Water District, also referred to as the GVWD Act. To ensure the continuous delivery of the regional water supply, a Drinking Water Conservation Plan has been developed that sets out the four stages of water restrictions to conserve water. The Plan provides specific guidance for GVWD members and its users on the efficient use of drinking water during periods of high demand, water shortages, and emergencies. This policy provides an overview of the guiding principles of the regional plan, the authority to implement the stages of the plan, the criteria for stage activation, and the plan’s implementation and enforcement. Drinking Water Conservation Plan The DWCP is a regional plan that is implemented and enforced through local governments’ bylaws to ensure the efficient use of drinking water and effective delivery to all users. The DWCP describes staged restrictions related to outdoor water use that users should follow to conserve water. Underlying the development and implementation of the DWCP are the following four principles:

1. Recognize drinking water as a precious resource that must be conserved. 2. Maintain the environmental, economic vitality, and health and safety of the region to the

extent possible in the face of a water shortage. 3. Optimize available water supplies and reduce water use. 4. Minimize adverse impacts to public activity and quality of life for the region’s residents.

Delegation of Authority The GVWD Commissioner provides management and oversight of the activities of the GVWD, as authorized by the GVWD Board and includes the authority to make a decision to activate, extend, or deactivate stages within the DWCP at any time. Recommendations to activate, extend, or deactivate a different stage of the DWCP are made by Metro Vancouver staff to the GVWD Commissioner and if required the GVWD Commissioner may consult with the GVWD Board Chair and standing committee Chair, on the recommendations. In most cases, the stages will be activated or deactivated in successive order, but they can also be activated or deactivated immediately in any order.

BOARD POLICY

UC-44

BOARD POLICY

21153865 Drinking Water Conservation Policy Page 2 of 2

Stages of the DWCP Each stage of the DWCP is designed to reduce demand for drinking water. Stage 1 reduces demand in the summer months by promoting water conservation and efficient watering practices. Stages 2 and 3 describe further restrictions to limit water use and are likely to be activated during unusually hot and dry conditions to maximize conservation through to early fall with the return of seasonal rainfall or until the water shortage situation is over. Stage 4 is an emergency stage that limits both indoor and outdoor water uses to ensure an adequate supply of drinking water for human consumption and essential uses such as firefighting. Activating Stages of the DWCP Stage 1 is activated automatically on May 1 until October 15 every year. A number of factors guide the GVWD Commissioner’s decision to activate the more restrictive stages of the DWCP. Activation of Stages 2, 3, and 4 of the DWCP is based on measured facts, reasoned predictions, and historical patterns, with a goal of ensuring the sufficient supply of drinking water until the events that caused the more restrictive stages are over. Metro Vancouver staff use a water supply system model to analyze technical information such as reservoir levels, user demand, and anticipated snowmelt among other parameters to track the performance of the water system. During periods of high demand, model projections are generated weekly and if any of the results indicate potential shortage there is further discussion regarding activating stricter stages of the DWCP. Factors considered at this stage of the discussion include:

- Available storage capacity of the Capilano and Seymour Reservoirs and alpine lakes; - Water allocated to Metro Vancouver by BC Hydro from the Coquitlam Reservoir; - Hydrologic forecasting parameters including temperature, rainfall, snowpack, and snowmelt; - Seasonal water demand trends (measured and charted daily); - User compliance with the restrictions; and - Water transmission system performance and ability to deliver water during periods of high

demand.

Implementation and Enforcement Once the GVWD Commissioner makes the decision to activate a stage, all local governments are alerted by way of notice within 24 hours, which triggers public notification and enforcement. Local governments are responsible for public notification of the stage, and enforcement of the applicable restrictions within 72 hours of receiving the GVWD Commissioner’s notice. Local governments incorporate DWCP restrictions into their bylaws, where each is responsible for monitoring and enforcing the restrictions in their communities. Local governments use a variety of tools to promote and ensure bylaw compliance including educational materials, using verbal and written warnings, issuing tickets, and imposing fines. Related Document:

Drinking Water Conservation Plan (Doc #21616303)

UC-45

21649271

5.3

To: Utilities Committee From: Roy Moulder, Division Manager, Purchasing and Risk Management, Financial Services Goran Oljaca, Director – Engineering and Construction, Water Services Date: May 15, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Award of Contract Resulting from Tender No. 17-011: Installation of Braid Street

Main No. 2 RECOMMENDATION That the GVWD Board authorize: a) award of a contract in the amount up to $6,146,290 (exclusive of taxes) to Sandpiper Contracting

LLP resulting from Tender No. 17-011 for the installation of Braid Street Main No. 2; and b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract. PURPOSE This report is to advise the GVWD Board of the results of Tender No. 17-011, Installation of Braid Street Main No. 2 and to recommend award of the contract in the amount up to $6,146,290 (exclusive of taxes) to Sandpiper Contracting LLP. BACKGROUND Pursuant to the GVWD Officers and Delegation Bylaw No. 247, 2014 (Bylaw) and the Procurement and Real Property Contracting Authority Policy (Policy), procurement contracts which exceed a value of $5 million require the approval of the Board of Directors. This report is being brought forward to the Utilities Committee to consider a recommendation to the GVWD Board to award a contract for the installation of Braid Street Main No. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Braid Street Main No. 2, which replaces the existing aging main, consists of approximately 1,800 metres of 600 mm (24-inch) diameter ductile iron water main between the Westburnco Reservoir and the Rousseau Street Main in the City of New Westminster (CNW). The work also includes the installation of a 600 mm diameter flow meter and chamber as part of Metro Vancouver’s Water Optimization Automation and Instrumentation Project. As a result of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ No. 16-032) that was publicly advertised on Metro Vancouver’s and BC Bid websites, three experienced firms were invited to respond to the tender. Tender No. 17-011 closed on May 9, 2017 with submissions from all three tenderers.

UC-46

Award of Contract Resulting from Tender No. 17-011: Installation of Braid Street Main No. 2 Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 2

21649271

The following bids were received (exclusive of taxes):

Tenderer Total Tender Price Sandpiper Contracting LLP $6,146,290 JJM Construction Ltd. $7,405,000 Jacob Bros Construction Inc. $8,545,000

The bid from Sandpiper Contracting LLP was reviewed for completeness by staff from the project team and the Purchasing Division and is identified as the lowest compliant bid. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVWD Board authorize:

a) award of a contract in the amount up to $6,146,290 (exclusive of taxes) to Sandpiper Contracting LLP resulting from Tender No. 17-011 for the installation of Braid Street Main No. 2; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract. 2. That the GVWD Board terminate Tender No. 17-011: Installation of Braid Street Main No. 2 and

direct staff to report back to the GVWD Board with options for an alternate course of action. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS If the GVWD Board approves Alternative 1, a contract will be awarded to Sandpiper Contracting LLP in the amount up to $6,146,290 (exclusive of taxes) to complete this project. The tender is the lowest compliant bid. The GVWD Board has the choice not to proceed with Alternative 1, but staff will need further direction in relation to the project. Alternative 2 will result in a delay to the project schedule. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION A tender was issued for the installation of Braid Street Main No. 2. Sandpiper Contracting LLP was identified as offering the lowest compliant bid which is within the overall budget, including contingency, allocated for the project. Based on the evaluation of the tenders, it is recommended that the Board of Directors authorize the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to award and execute a contract to Sandpiper Contracting LLP in the amount up to $6,146,290 (exclusive of taxes). Attachment 1. Braid Street Main No. 2 Route Plan

UC-47

BRAID STREET MAIN No. 2LENGTH: 1800m

WESTBURNCO RESERVOIR& PUMP STATIONS

EXISTING BRAID STREET MAIN

CHECKPRINT

Attachment 1

UC-48

21359106

To: Utilities Committee

From: Roy Moulder, Division Manager, Purchasing and Risk Management, Financial Services Department Goran Oljaca, Director, Engineering and Construction, Water Services Date: May 25, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Award of Contract Resulting from RFP No. 17-034: Engineering Services for the

Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South RECOMMENDATION That the GVWD Board authorize: a) award of a contract in the amount up to $997,281 (exclusive of taxes) to CH2M Hill Canada Limited

for Phase A, Preliminary Design, resulting from RFP No. 17-034, Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract. _________________________________________________________________________________

PURPOSE This report is to advise the GVWD Board of the results of RFP No. 17-034, Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South and to recommend award of the contract for Phase A, Preliminary Design in the amount up to $997,281 (exclusive of taxes) to CH2M Hill Canada Limited. Board approval to award subsequent phases of work will be sought at a later date. BACKGROUND Pursuant to the GVWD Officers and Delegation Bylaw No. 247, 2014 (Bylaw) and the Procurement and Real Property Contracting Authority Policy (Policy), procurement contracts which exceed a value of $5 million require the approval of the Board of Directors. Further, the Policy states that contracting authority for multi-phase contracts is determined based on the anticipated total value of the services to be provided over all phases. This report is being brought forward to the Utilities Committee to consider a recommendation to the GVWD Board to award a contract for consulting engineering services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Two new water mains referred to as the Kennedy Newton Main and the Annacis Main No. 5 South are required to meet growing water demand south of the Fraser River and increase water supply to the area served by the Kennedy and Newton Reservoirs in the City of Surrey. The two new mains are 1500 mm (60-inch) in diameter and will extend for approximately 12 km between the south shaft of the proposed Annacis Water Supply Tunnel and the Newton Reservoir in Surrey. As a result of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ No. 16-144) that was publicly advertised on Metro Vancouver’s and BC Bid websites, four experienced firms were invited to respond to a Request for

5.4

UC-49

Award of Contract Resulting from RFP No. 17-034: Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South

Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Page 2 of 3

21359106

Proposal (RFP No. 17-034) for the Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South projects. The RFP closed on February 7, 2017 and all four firms responded. The Purchasing and Risk Management Division determined that the proposal submitted by CDM Smith was non-compliant and advised that the proposal was not to be considered for evaluation. Prices are summarized below (exclusive of taxes).

Proponent Phase A: Preliminary

Design

Phase B: Detailed Design

Phase C: Construction

Services

Total Cost (exclusive of

taxes)

CH2M Hill Canada Limited $850,084 $2,263,782 $3,575,244 $6,689,110 Hatch Corporation $858,211 $1,886,992 $3,359,415 $6,104,618 AECOM $808,422 $2,001,132 $3,286,057 $6,095,611 CDM Smith N/A N/A N/A N/A

The submissions were evaluated based on a maximum of 65 points for the technical proposals and 35 points for the financial proposals. CH2M Hill Canada Limited’s proposal achieved the highest technical and consequently the overall score due to their previous experience with similar works and the qualifications of their design team. Following the proposal evaluation and issuance of a recommendation to negotiate with the highest ranked proponent, a meeting was held with CH2M Hill Canada Limited to confirm the scope of work, adequacy of the estimated level of effort, availability of staff and project schedule. Based on the outcome of this meeting, CH2M Hill Canada Limited requested to increase the cost of Phase A from $850,084 to $997,281 due to an increase in hours for:

a) additional required planning by more senior staff at the commencement of the projects to address alignment, environmental and traffic management issues;

b) potential increase in the number of trenchless crossings; c) potential increase in the diameter of the proposed water main; d) additional investigations required for the connection to the south shaft of the Annacis Water Supply

Tunnel; and e) additional project management effort due to the large number of stakeholders. It is intended that Phase A be awarded at this time and Phases B and C be awarded following negotiations, subject to satisfactory performance of the work under Phase A, and after further authorization from the Board. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVWD Board authorize:

a) award of a contract in the amount up to $997,281 (exclusive of taxes) to CH2M Hill Canada Limited for Phase A, Preliminary Design, resulting from RFP No. 17-034, Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the contract.

UC-50

Award of Contract Resulting from RFP No. 17-034: Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South

Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Page 3 of 3

21359106

2. That the GVWD Board terminate RFP No. 17-034: Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South, and direct staff to report back to the GVWD Board with options for an alternate course of action.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS If the GVWD Board approves Alternative 1, a contract will be awarded to CH2M Hill Canada Limited in an amount up to $977,281 (exclusive of taxes), to complete Phase A of the projects. This amount is within the budget allocated for the projects. The proposal submitted by CH2M Hill Canada Limited is the highest ranked and contemplates additional phases of the work and the overall estimated value of the contract is $6,689,110 + $147,197 (for additional hours related to the execution and management of the work) for a total of $6,836,307 (exclusive of taxes and escalation). It is expected that subsequent phases of the work will be awarded to CH2M Hill Canada Limited subject to satisfactory completion of Phase A at which time the total cost and details of the subsequent phases of the work will be finalized. Award of further phases will require Board approval pursuant to the provisions of the Policy. The GVWD Board has the choice not to proceed with Alternative 1 but staff will need further direction in relation to the project. Alternative 2 will result in delays to the project schedule that will impact the development of additional transmission capacity for members south of the Fraser River. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION A Request for Proposal was issued for Engineering Services for the Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main No. 5 South, and CH2M Hill Canada Limited was identified as offering the highest overall ranked proposal. Based on the evaluation of all responses it is recommended that the GVWD Board authorize the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to award and execute a contract to CH2M Hill Canada Limited in the amount up to $977,281 (exclusive of taxes). Authorization from the Board to award subsequent phases of work will be sought at a later date. Attachment 1. Kennedy Newton Main and Annacis Main 5 South Route Alignment.

UC-51

KENNEDY NEWTON MAINLENGTH: 9100m

ANNACIS MAIN No. 5SOUTH LENGTH: 3000m

KENNEDY PARKRESERVOIR

NEWTONRESERVOIR

1 & 2

ANNACIS WATER SUPPLY TUNNEL

HELLINGS TANK

CHECKPRINT

UC-52

5.5

To: Utilities Committee From: Roy Moulder, Division Manager, Purchasing and Risk Management, Financial

Services Murray Gant, Program Manager, Major Projects, Water Services Date: May 19, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services for the Annacis Water

Supply Tunnel Project RECOMMENDATION That the GVWD Board authorize: a) award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services, in the amount up to $11,108,137

(exclusive of taxes) to the Phase A project consultant, Hatch Corporation, for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the required documentation. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to request GVWD Board authorization to award Phase B – Detailed Design Engineering Services to the Phase A project consultant, Hatch Corporation, for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project in the amount up to $11,108,137 (exclusive of taxes). BACKGROUND Pursuant to the GVWD Officers and Delegation Bylaw No. 247, 2014 (Bylaw) and the Procurement and Real Property Contracting Authority Policy (Policy), procurement contracts which exceed a value of $5 million require the approval of the GVWD Board of Directors. For multi-phase consultancy contracts, the Policy provides that the value of the contract is the anticipated total value of the services to be provided over all phases, exclusive of taxes. The current contract was initially awarded in 2015 to the project consultant, Hatch Corporation, for Phase A, Preliminary Design, and now requires GVWD Board approval to proceed with Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services. This report is being brought forward to the Utilities Committee to consider a recommendation to the GVWD Board to authorize award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services, to the Phase A project consultant, Hatch Corporation, in order to continue with the engineering services for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project.

UC-53

Award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project will provide increased capacity to meet future demand south of the Fraser River, long term scour protection, and improved resiliency to withstand a major earthquake. The project comprises an approximately 2.3 kilometer long tunnel and two deep vertical shafts, one in the City of New Westminster and one in the City of Surrey. The project will include:

a. constructing temporary access shafts; b. excavating a deep tunnel below the river using a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM); c. installing a large diameter steel water main inside the tunnel and shafts; d. constructing underground valve chambers near the top of each shaft; and e. connecting the water supply tunnel to new water mains on each side of the river.

A Request for Qualification (RFQ No. 15-049) for the Preliminary Design, Detailed Design, and Construction Engineering of Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project was publicly advertised on Metro Vancouver’s and BC Bid websites on March 4, 2015. A Request for Proposal (RFP No. 15-127) was subsequently issued on August 6, 2015 to the two proponents shortlisted during the RFQ process. The RFP closed on September 18, 2015, and both pre-qualified proponents submitted their proposal. Hatch Corporation was identified as offering the highest-ranked proposal. Following negotiations, Hatch Corporation was awarded Phase A, Preliminary Design for $5,386,942 (exclusive of taxes). At the time of award of Phase A, the anticipated total value of the contract for all three phases of work (preliminary design, detailed design, construction engineering) was $30,600,994 (exclusive of taxes). On May 11, 2017, Hatch Corporation provided an estimated cost for Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services totaling $11,108,137 (exclusive of taxes). This amount is higher than the initial proposed amount ($10,352,055) due to unforeseen changes in scope from the original project concept, including environmental services associated with building demolition, project permitting and contaminated site remediation requirements, development of additional landscape plans and additional supplementary geotechnical and environmental drilling investigations. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVWD Board authorize:

a) award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services, in the amount up to $11,108,137 (exclusive of taxes) to the Phase A project consultant, Hatch Corporation, for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project; and

b) the Commissioner and the Corporate Officer to execute the required documentation.

2. That the GVWD Board terminate the contract with Hatch Corporation resulting from RFP No. 15-127: Consulting Engineering Services for Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project and direct staff to report back to the GVWD Board with options for an alternate course of action.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS If the GVWD Board approves Alternative 1, Detailed Design Engineering Services in the amount up to $11,108,137 will be added to the contract with Hatch Corporation. This amount is within the $28 million budget allotted for detailed design for the project. The GVWD Board has the choice not to proceed with Alternative 1 but staff would need further direction in relation to the project. Alternative 2 will result in a delay to the project schedule which

UC-54

Award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 3 of 3 could impact water supply to communities south of the Fraser River and is anticipated to add additional costs to the overall project. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION An RFP was issued for engineering consulting services for the Annacis Water Supply Tunnel Project. The contract for Phase A, Preliminary Design was initially awarded on December 11, 2015 to Hatch Corporation. As Phase A nears completion, staff have identified that the total anticipated value of the contract for Phase B, Detailed Design will exceed the original estimated fee of $10,352,055. This is the result of additional effort required for addressing environmental services for building demolition on the north shaft site, permitting, development of landscaping plans for permit submission, additional geotechnical and environmental investigations, and contaminated site remediation. It is recommended that the GVWD Board authorize the award of Phase B, Detailed Design Engineering Services to Hatch Corporation in the amount up to $11,108,137 (exclusive of taxes) and authorize the Commissioner and Corporate Officer to execute the required documentation. 21664958

UC-55

5.6

To: Utilities Committee From: Frank Huber, Director - Major Projects, Management Systems & Utility Services,

Water Services Mark Ferguson, Director - Project Delivery, Liquid Waste Services

Date: May 19, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures to April 30, 2017 RECOMMENDATION That the Utilities Committee receive for information the report dated May 19, 2017 titled “Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures to April 30, 2017”. PURPOSE To report on the status of the utilities capital expenditures. Utilities capital projects are typically multi-year in nature; therefore, this report provides a comparison between the total project budgets and total projected expenditures to project completion. BACKGROUND The Capital Expenditure reporting process as approved by the Board provides for regular status reports on capital expenditures with interim reports sent to the Utilities, Zero Waste, and Performance and Audit Committees in June/July and October/November, and a final year-end report to the Committees and Board in April of each year. This is the first in a series of three reports on capital expenditures for 2017. In addition to this report, due to its size and complexity, separate detailed updates on the Lions Gate Secondary WWTP Upgrade Project are provided to the Utilities Committee and Board quarterly. STATUS OF UTILITIES CAPITAL EXPENDITURES The capital projects are separated into two types: “Ongoing” and “Completed”. Narrative information is provided describing key aspects of specific projects and each project is presented in the context of Total Projected Project Costs to Completion as compared to the Total Approved Budget. Appendix A contains summary financial information on “Ongoing Projects” and “Completed Projects”. The information presented is for Total Projected Completion which will generally cover multiple years. Capital project budgets typically include a minimum contingency of 10%. Individual project financial information is included as follows: Schedule 1 – Water, and Schedule 2 – Sewerage and Drainage (Liquid Waste). Appendix B provides narrative information for specific projects.

UC-56

Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures to April 30, 2017 Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 2

21543942

ALTERNATIVES This is an information report. No alternatives are presented. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Capital expenditures are funded internally (pay as you go) and through debt charges. As capital expenditures are incurred, short term financing is secured and converted twice per year to long term debt through the Municipal Finance Authority. If capital expenditures are less than budgeted for the year, the savings in debt charges create a surplus which may go against future capital expenditures via the Contribution to Capital Program to reduce borrowing. Ongoing Capital Projects: The Water District is projecting to spend $31.4 million (3.4 %) less than the approved total project budgets for those projects in progress and included in Schedule 1. The Sewerage and Drainage District (Liquid Waste) is projecting to spend $34.8 million (1.8 %) less than the approved total project budgets for those projects in progress and included in Schedule 2. It is anticipated that in aggregate, ongoing capital projects in both Districts will be slightly under spent because the full contingency is not required. Completed Capital Projects: These are projects that have been completed during 2017, some of which may extend over multiple years. Overall the Water District and Sewerage and Drainage District (Liquid Waste) projects in this category are underspent by $0.6 million (13.3 %) and $0.3 million (2.7 %) respectively. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The capital expenditure reporting process approved by the Board provides for interim reports to Committees in June/July and October/November, and a final year-end report to the Committees and Board in April of each year. This is the first in a series of three reports on capital expenditures for 2017. Both Districts (Water and Sewerage & Drainage) are projecting to be under spent for both ongoing and completed capital projects to April 30, 2017. It is anticipated that in aggregate, ongoing capital projects in both Districts will be slightly under spent because the full contingency is not required. Economic Impact While a significant investment in infrastructure for the GVWD and GVS&DD, the projects identified in Schedules 1 and 2 represent approximately 5,700 person years of employment and, over their life (development and construction), make up about $500 million of the Gross Domestic Product of the region. Attachments Appendix A: Capital Expenditure Summary Information as at April 30, 2017 Schedule 1: Water District Capital Expenditures Schedule 2: Sewerage & Drainage District (Liquid Waste) Capital Expenditures Appendix B: Capital Project Status Information, April 30, 2017

UC-57

APPENDIX A

Capital Expenditure Summary Information as of April 30, 2017

Ongoing Projects Total Projected Expenditures to

Completion ACE/ Total Budget Projected Variance

Water $ 889, 346, 622 $ 920, 789, 822 $ 31, 443, 200

Liquid Waste $ 1, 919, 356, 977 $ 1, 954, 144, 377 $ 34, 787, 400

Total Ongoing Projects: $ 2, 808, 703, 599 $ 2, 874, 934, 199 $ 66, 230, 600

Completed Projects Total Actual Expenditures ACE/ Total Budget Variance

Water $ 3, 857, 069 $ 4, 450, 000 $ 592, 931

Liquid Waste $ 12, 488, 312 $ 12, 830, 000 $ 341, 688

Total Completed Projects: $ 16, 345, 381 $ 17, 280, 000 $ 934, 619

UC-58

Schedule 1

5.6 Schedule 1 / 2017 April Summary Page 1 of 4 6/9/2017

Water District Capital Expenditures As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

On-going Grand Totals 547,946,742 889,346,622 920,789,822 31,443,200 Completed Grand Totals 3,857,069 3,857,069 4,450,000 592,931

ON-GOING PROJECTS

Infrastructure Growth CapA0036 Maple Ridge Main Stage II Maple Ridge 18,906,884 19,580,000 19,580,000 - (b) 99% 2017 YA0140 Coquitlam Intake No 2 Coquitlam 1,088,746 7,230,000 7,230,000 - 25% 2018 YA0164 Burnaby Mtn PS 2 Pre Design Burnaby 240,492 250,000 300,000 50,000 (d) 99% 2017 YA0171 Barnston Maple Ridge PS Pitt Meadows 46,292,486 46,925,000 46,500,000 (425,000) (c)(k) 99% 2017 YA0203 Seymour Main No 5 North PreDes North Vancouver 792,737 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 92% 2017 N Geotechnical investigation delays.A0214 Port Mann Mn No 2 North Design Coquitlam 1,532,674 1,600,000 1,600,000 - 99% 2017 YA0218 Kennedy Newton Main Surrey 442,660 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 44% 2017 N Route selection delays.A0219 Coquitlam Main 4 Cape Horn Pre Coquitlam 382,402 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 30% 2018 YA0226 Angus Drive Main Construction Vancouver 25,736,563 27,000,000 28,000,000 1,000,000 (d) 95% 2017 N Miscellaneous construction delays.A0241 Hellings Tank No 2 - Pre Des Delta 695,125 800,000 800,000 - 87% 2017 N Preliminary design delays.A0251 Newton Pumping Improvements Surrey 247,389 250,000 250,000 - 99% 2017 YA0254 Port Mann Main No 2 N Constr Coquitlam 19,876,431 24,100,000 24,100,000 - 70% 2017 N Lougheed Highway/CP Rail crossing and Colony Farm

section delays.A0262 SDM1 12th to 28th Ave Constr Delta 10,973,833 20,350,000 20,350,000 - (i)(j) 65% 2017 N TFN grant funding delays.A0263 Hellings Tank No 2 Det Des Delta 16,238 2,200,000 2,200,000 - 1% 2017 YA0265 Fleetwood Res Detailed Design Surrey 2,141,082 2,700,000 2,700,000 - 79% 2017 YA0272 Port Mann Main 2 S Prebuild Surrey 1,371,915 1,700,000 2,000,000 300,000 (d) 98% 2017 YA0276 Annacis Tunnel Prelim.Design New Westminster 5,479,843 7,000,000 8,000,000 1,000,000 (d) 90% 2017 YA0277 Annacis Tunnel Detailed Design New Westminster 2,250,000 28,000,000 28,000,000 - 8% 2018 YA0286 COQ4 Central Pre Design Coquitlam 153,562 1,670,000 1,670,000 - 10% 2018 YA0287 Port Mann Main 2 South Design Surrey 412,104 2,300,000 2,300,000 - 18% 2017 YA0290 COQ4 South Pre Design Coquitlam 62,293 1,350,000 1,350,000 - 8% 2018 YA0316 Cap Main No 5 Predesign Vancouver 344,153 550,000 550,000 - 63% 2017 YA0322 Whalley Main Detailed Design Surrey 111,657 1,200,000 1,200,000 - 9% 2017 YA0325 Jericho Res No 1 Detail Design Township of Langley 1,292,585 3,000,000 3,000,000 - (g) 43% 2017 YA0330 Fleetwood Res Construction Surrey - 32,500,000 32,500,000 - 0% 2019 YA0331 Hellings Tank No 2 Prop Pur Surrey - 2,200,000 2,200,000 - 0% 2018 YA0346 Newton PS No 2 Pre Design Surrey 41,857 1,200,000 1,200,000 - 3% 2018 YA0347 Annacis Main No 5 S Pre Design Surrey - 750,000 750,000 - 0% 2018 YA0348 Annacis Main No 5 S Design Surrey - 2,850,000 2,850,000 - 0% 2019 YA0349 Kennedy Newton Main Design Surrey/Delta - 7,500,000 7,500,000 - 0% 2019 YA0351 Jericho Res No 1 Construction Township of Langley - 31,600,000 31,600,000 - (g) 0% 2019 Y

140,885,711 281,355,000 283,280,000 1,925,000 Infrastructure Maintenance Cap

A0002 Des and Cons Remed E2 Shaft P1 North Vancouver 1,419,618 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 95% 2017 YA0075 Phase 2Rem Cons E2 Drain CI Da North Vancouver 806,637 850,000 850,000 - 95% 2017 YA0134 Douglas Road Main 2 Stage 1 Burnaby 10,462,584 11,300,000 12,500,000 1,200,000 (a) 99% 2017 YA0146 Douglas Rd Main 2 Stage II Burnaby 10,355,481 10,360,000 11,000,000 640,000 (a) 99% 2017 YA0170 DRM2 13th Ave Section Pipes Burnaby 13,363,479 14,500,000 16,000,000 1,500,000 (a) 90% 2017 N Tie-ins being coordinated with Burnaby.A0181 DRM2 Kincaid Section Des Const Burnaby 9,596,645 12,300,000 12,300,000 - 80% 2019 N Delayed crossover chamber construction.A0182 DRM2 Delta Sect Des Construt Burnaby 15,007,995 15,810,000 16,600,000 790,000 (d) 95% 2017 N Construction delayed to fall 2017.A0207 DRM2 Still Creek Design Burnaby 447,420 4,400,000 4,400,000 - 20% 2018 N Procurement delays.A0211 E2 Shaft Phase 3 Test Wells North Vancouver 4,411,151 4,500,000 4,500,000 - 99% 2017 N Drilling delays due to challenging ground conditions.A0212 Annacis 3 Scour Construction Regional 309,636 375,000 814,000 439,000 (a)(h) 99% 2017 N Permitting delays.A0217 SSU Serpentine Riv Xing Rehab Surrey 314,780 325,000 480,000 155,000 (d) 99% 2017 YA0235 SCFP Storage Building North Vancouver 2,346,223 2,456,000 2,400,000 (56,000) (e) 99% 2017 N Design delays.A0236 Westburnco 1 Trsfmr MCC Repl New Westminster 210,273 942,000 942,000 - 30% 2017 N Station shutdown date revised.A0244 Central Park WPS Starters Burnaby 319,329 2,100,000 2,100,000 - 17% 2017 N Delays due to scope change.A0250 Douglas Rd Main 2 Van Heights Burnaby 232,879 480,000 480,000 - 49% 2017 N Procurement delays.A0252 Cleveland Dam Drumgate Resurf North Vancouver 980,542 2,635,000 2,635,000 - 37% 2017 N Project completion postponed to Summer 2017. A0260 SCFP CW Cols Remediation Const North Vancouver 1,485,938 1,600,000 2,000,000 400,000 (f) 99% 2017 Y

Total Project

UC-59

Schedule 1

5.6 Schedule 1 / 2017 April Summary Page 2 of 4 6/9/2017

Water District Capital Expenditures As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Project

A0273 Lynn Valley Main Replacement North Vancouver 42,819 600,000 600,000 - 10% 2021 N Project schedule under review.A0274 37 Ave Main Replace Pre Des Vancouver 49,768 1,050,000 1,050,000 - 10% 2020 N Project schedule under review.A0281 SCFP Concrete Coatings Design North Vancouver 43,974 250,000 250,000 - 18% 2017 N Evaluating areas that require repairs.A0298 SFD Buttr Anch Bridge Repr Des North Vancouver 90,043 180,000 180,000 - 50% 2017 YA0299 CD Bridge Girder Recoat Constr North Vancouver 15,135 525,000 525,000 - 3% 2017 YA0304 SCFP Filter Underdrain Const North Vancouver 81,578 6,000,000 6,000,000 - 5% 2018 YA0305 CD Bridge Girder Recoat Design North Vancouver 27,019 52,000 100,000 48,000 (d)(h) 50% 2017 YA0314 Fisherman's Tr.Bridge Design North Vancouver 167,877 250,000 250,000 - 67% 2017 YA0315 E2 Shaft Ph 3 Prod Well Constr North Vancouver 3,036,908 12,000,000 12,000,000 - (m) 30% 2018 N Drilling delays due to challenging ground.A0319 Central Park Mn Patt 10 Pdsgn Burnaby 69,666 1,800,000 1,800,000 - 4% 2017 N Project scope under review.A0327 LIDM Scour Protection Design Richmond/Delta - 250,000 250,000 - 0% 2018 YA0329 Rechlor Kiosks Repair Design Regional 26,125 100,000 100,000 - 26% 2017 YA0337 Sasamat Res Joint Upgrades Des UEL 24,225 75,000 75,000 - 32% 2017 YA0338 SFD Buttr Anch Bridge Rep Cons North Vancouver 13,847 1,320,000 1,320,000 - 1% 2017 YA0339 CLD Spillway Concrete Rep Cons North Vancouver 20,575 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 1% 2018 YA0341 Cleveland Dam HBV Rehab Pdsgn North Vancouver 105 100,000 100,000 - 0% 2017 YA0342 Fishermans Trail Bridge Const North Vancouver 25,894 2,300,000 2,300,000 - 1% 2018 YA0350 SCFP Concrete Coatings Const North Vancouver 11,755 6,250,000 6,250,000 - 0% 2019 N Evaluating areas that require repairs.A0352 Rechlor Kiosks Repair Constr Regional - 500,000 500,000 - 0% 2018 YA0353 Rechlor Station Upgrades PD Regional - 300,000 300,000 - 0% 2017 N Design delays.A0355 Riverside Dr Wall Stairs Const North Vancouver - 375,000 375,000 - 0% 2017 YA0356 Central Park PS Seismic Upgrde Burnaby 3,918 3,700,000 3,700,000 - 0% 2018 YA0359 LIDM Scour Protect Ph1 Const Delta 263,573 1,750,000 1,750,000 - 15% 2018 YA0362 LVM PRV Chamber Upgrade North Vancouver 6,189 1,300,000 3,300,000 2,000,000 (h) 0% 2018 Y

76,091,601 129,460,000 136,576,000 7,116,000 Infrastructure Resilience Cap

A0162 P Mann Water Supply Tunnel Con Surrey/Coquitlam 219,094,183 224,000,000 239,000,000 15,000,000 (d)(n) 99% 2017 N Shaft construction and tunnelling delays.A0188 Seymour Falls Dam ADAS Ph II North Vancouver 287,318 300,000 300,000 - 99% 2017 N Awaiting programming to complete final commissioning.A0193 Braid St Main No 2 Design New Westminster 468,319 500,000 500,000 - 99% 2017 N Deferred to accommodate Queensborough Main

replacement.A0209 Mackay Creek Mitigation PreDes North Vancouver 994,554 997,800 1,000,000 2,200 99% 2017 YA0223 Convert to Blk Sodium Hypochi Coquitlam 4,428,953 7,300,000 8,300,000 1,000,000 (a)(d) 60% 2017 N Construction on hold until Nov 2017.A0225 Capilano Main No9 Prebuild North Vancouver 5,631,287 6,000,000 6,000,000 - 99% 2017 YA0231 Second Narrows Tunnel Det Dsgn North Vancouver/Burna 6,625,190 15,000,000 15,000,000 - 50% 2017 YA0233 SCFP Filter Gullet Lining Des North Vancouver 390,048 420,000 500,000 80,000 (d) 99% 2017 YA0238 Coquitlam Gatehouse Coquitlam 1,410,664 1,600,000 1,600,000 - 92% 2017 N Differing site conditions.A0239 Coquitlam Multi-Storage Coquitlam 1,007,524 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 92% 2017 N Differing site conditions.A0246 Clayton Reservoir Design Surrey 2,182,325 2,200,000 2,700,000 500,000 (l) 99% 2017 YA0248 SCFP Filter Gullet Lining Cons North Vancouver 1,183,491 1,290,000 1,500,000 210,000 (f) 99% 2017 YA0261 Cap 9 North Construction North Vancouver 25,832,900 29,000,000 29,000,000 - 95% 2017 N Edgemont Blvd chamber installation deferred to 2017.A0267 CWTP Enhancements Design Coquitlam 124,972 190,000 200,000 10,000 (d) 90% 2017 YA0268 CWTP Enhancements Construct Coquitlam 1,015,863 2,300,000 2,300,000 - 50% 2017 YA0270 Coq Intake Tower Seismic Upg Coquitlam 114,837 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 11% 2017 YA0278 MacKay Creek Detailed Design North Vancouver 423,338 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 50% 2017 YA0279 Cambie Rich Crossing Des Ph 1 Richmond 154,734 250,000 250,000 - 62% 2017 YA0280 Haney Main Crossing Des Ph 1 Richmond 155,183 250,000 250,000 - 62% 2017 YA0284 Westburnco Pwr Reliability PD New Westminster 44,051 350,000 350,000 - 13% 2017 YA0285 Reservoir Iso Valve Auto Des Regional 156,474 700,000 700,000 - 22% 2018 YA0288 CRWPS Backup Power Pre Design North Vancouver 74,043 500,000 500,000 - 15% 2017 YA0289 CRWPS Backup Power Design North Vancouver 148 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 0% 2018 YA0291 Clayton Reservoir Ph1 Constru Surrey 595,432 30,000,000 30,000,000 - 10% 2018 YA0292 SE2 Joint Improvement Design North Vancouver 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 99% 2017 YA0293 SE2 Joint Improvement Construc North Vancouver 28,103 775,000 775,000 - 4% 2017 N Coordinating with Capilano Main No.9 Cross-over

chamber.A0294 Sunnyside Res No 1 Upg Pre Des Surrey 97,641 150,000 250,000 100,000 (d) 65% 2017 YA0295 Bby Mtn Res Seismic Upgrd Desi Burnaby 279,850 289,000 300,000 11,000 (l) 99% 2017 YA0296 Cap Res Boat Wharf Det Design North Vancouver 40,278 100,000 100,000 - 40% 2017 Y

UC-60

Schedule 1

5.6 Schedule 1 / 2017 April Summary Page 3 of 4 6/9/2017

Water District Capital Expenditures As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Project

A0297 Seymour Falls Boat Wharf Desig North Vancouver 50,661 100,000 100,000 - 51% 2017 YA0300 CLDPH Seism Upgrde Detail Dsgn North Vancouver 173,124 200,000 300,000 100,000 (d) 90% 2017 YA0301 Emergency Power Strategy Regional - 400,000 400,000 - 0% 2018 YA0302 SCFP Site Entrance Imprv Const North Vancouver 59,296 500,000 500,000 - 12% 2017 YA0306 Braid Street Main No. 2 Const New Westminster 285,658 7,800,000 7,800,000 - 4% 2017 N Deferred to accommodate Queensborough Main

replacement.A0307 Westburnco PS BU Power PreDes New Westminster 168,531 500,000 500,000 - 38% 2019 YA0308 BMRPS Back up Power PreDes Pitt Meadows - 500,000 500,000 - 0% 2017 N Project schedule under reviewA0309 BMRPS BU Power Detailed Design Pitt Meadows - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 0% 2017 N Project schedule under reviewA0311 SCFP UPS Reconfig Design North Vancouver 71,785 200,000 200,000 - 36% 2017 YA0324 2nd Narrows Tunnel Site Prep North Vancouver 1,246,936 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 45% 2017 YA0326 SDM3 12th to PebbleHill PreDes Delta 9,800 400,000 400,000 - 2% 2017 N Project scope under reviewA0332 Sunnyside Res No 1 Upg Det Des Surrey 10,336 300,000 300,000 - 3% 2017 YA0333 Sunnyside Res Seis Upg Det Des Surrey 33,146 600,000 600,000 - 12% 2017 YA0334 Bby Mtn Res Seismic Upgd Const Burnaby 17,012 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 1% 2018 YA0335 CLDPH Seis Upgd Const North Vancouver 4,040 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 0% 2017 YA0336 CHPS Seis Upgr Detailed Des Coquitlam 37,751 300,000 300,000 - 15% 2017 YA0340 Bby Mtn Tank Upgd Prelim Desgn Burnaby 25,145 400,000 400,000 - 6% 2018 N Site location under review.A0343 Cap Mid Debris Boom Des Const North Vancouver - 750,000 750,000 - 0% 2018 N Deferred to accommodate Cleveland Dam Drum Gate

Project.A0344 Sey Lk Debris Boom Des Const North Vancouver - 800,000 800,000 - 0% 2017 YA0345 Capilano Res Boat Wharf Const North Vancouver - 750,000 750,000 - 0% 2018 N Deferred to accommodate Cleveland Dam Drum Gate

Project.A0354 Rechlor Sites Backup Pwr PD Regional - 500,000 500,000 - 0% 2018 YA0358 SCFP UPS Reconfig Construction North Vancouver - 1,070,000 1,070,000 - 0% 2019 YA0363 Seymour Main No 5 North DetDes North Vancouver 4,340 7,000,000 7,000,000 - 1% 2021 Y

275,089,264 365,881,800 382,895,000 17,013,200 Infrastructure Upgrade Cap

A0161 Capilano Power Feasibil Study North Vancouver 218,368 250,000 250,000 - 87% 2017 N Coordinating with Joint Water Use Plan.A0175 Water Optimization Auto Instru Regional 1,636,136 9,540,000 9,540,000 - 17% 2020 N Procurement delays.A0183 Coq Comm Improvements Design Coquitlam 4,662 150,000 150,000 - 3% 2017 N Coordinating with BC Hydro.A0224 CLD Seismic StabilityAssessmet North Vancouver 21,849 350,000 350,000 - 6% 2017 N Delay in input data collection.A0232 Lynn Valley Watr Reservoir Des North Vancouver 1,337,088 1,420,000 1,500,000 80,000 (d) 99% 2017 YA0234 Tilbury Valve Chamber Delta 460,925 3,900,000 3,900,000 - 15% 2017 N Delay in land acquisition.A0245 SCFP - Hydraulic Power Units North Vancouver 692,252 700,000 700,000 - 99% 2017 N Delay in assembly and testing.A0255 Queensborough Ewen Rpl Design New Westminster 815,716 820,000 900,000 80,000 (d) 95% 2017 N Design revisions.A0256 Queensborough Ewen Rpl Cons P1 New Westminster 5,470,216 5,500,000 5,500,000 - 99% 2017 N Construction delays.A0257 SDM1 28th to 34B Ave Design Delta 806,797 831,000 950,000 119,000 (d) 95% 2017 YA0258 SDM1 28th to 34B Ave Const Delta 70,085 10,300,000 10,300,000 - 1% 2017 N Property acquisition and permitting delays.A0266 Lynn Valley Wrt Stor Res Const North Vancouver 3,486,277 4,000,000 6,000,000 2,000,000 (a)(d) 99% 2017 N Misc. construction delays.A0282 Coq Comm Improvement Constr Coquitlam 118,639 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 7% 2017 YA0283 Burwell Apl Res Valve Imp Des North Vancouver 34,541 150,000 150,000 - 30% 2017 YA0303 CWTP Ozone Upgrade Design Coquitlam 32,074 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 5% 2017 YA0310 Queensborough Ewen Rpl Cons P2 New Westminster 1,704,081 3,600,000 3,600,000 - 50% 2017 N Differing site conditions and utility conflicts.A0312 CDEA Additional GV Pump Wells North Vancouver 19,108 750,000 750,000 - 5% 2018 YA0313 SDM 28th Ave Crossover Design Delta 252,162 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 25% 2017 YA0317 Water Meter Upgrade Det Design Regional 63,019 1,800,000 1,800,000 - 4% 2021 YA0318 Haney Main No 2 Viv Ch Upg Dsg Maple Ridge 66,638 300,000 300,000 - 22% 2017 YA0320 Sap Main No1 Line Valve Dsgn New Westminster 86,155 450,000 450,000 - 19% 2017 YA0328 SFD Turbine Upgrade Proj Des North Vancouver 9,235 100,000 100,000 - 9% 2018 YA0357 LSCR Learn Lodge Det Design North Vancouver 971 400,000 400,000 - 0% 2017 YA0360 LCOC Metal Shop Det Design Burnaby 4,853 120,000 120,000 - 4% 2018 YA0361 CWTP Ozone Upgrade Cons Coquitlam - 11,000,000 11,000,000 - 0% 2018 YA0364 Water Meter Upgrades Construct Regional - 10,100,000 10,100,000 - 0% 2021 YA0365 Haney Main No 2 Vlv Ch Upg Con Maple Ridge - 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 0% 2018 Y

17,411,846 71,481,000 73,760,000 2,279,000 Infrastructure Boundary Main 5 Cap

UC-61

Schedule 1

5.6 Schedule 1 / 2017 April Summary Page 4 of 4 6/9/2017

Water District Capital Expenditures As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Project

A0149 Boundary Rd Main No 5 Phase 3 Regional 35,957,400 36,500,000 39,000,000 2,500,000 (d) 99% 2017 Y35,957,400 36,500,000 39,000,000 2,500,000

Infrastructure Relocation CapA8000 South Fraser Perimeter Rd Regional 298,285 300,079 554,079 254,000 (d) 95% 2017 N Permits to be issued by MOTI for land tenureA8001 Hwy 1 Widen and PM Bridge Twin Regional 1,738,930 1,740,743 2,024,743 284,000 (d) 97% 2017 N Permits to be issued by MOTI for land tenureA8008 Evergreen Line Regional 122,589 128,000 200,000 72,000 (d) 90% 2017 N Statutory rights of way remain outstanding

2,159,803 2,168,822 2,778,822 610,000 Infrastructure Opportunity Prgm Cap

A0191 Barnston MR PS energy generatn Pitt Meadows 351,117 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 14% 2018 Y351,117 2,500,000 2,500,000 -

Total On-going Projects 547,946,742 889,346,622 920,789,822 31,443,200

COMPLETED PROJECTS

Infrastructure Growth CapA0215 Port Mann Mn No 2 South PreDes Surrey 359,056 359,056 500,000 140,944 (d) 100%A0321 Whalley Main Predesign Surrey 171,649 171,649 600,000 428,351 (d) 100%

530,705 530,705 1,100,000 569,295 Infrastructure Maintenance Cap

A0259 SCFP CW Roof Imp Phase 2 North Vancouver 784,986 784,986 800,000 15,014 100%A0275 LCOC Building Envelope Repair Burnaby 1,791,607 1,791,607 1,800,000 8,393 100%

2,576,593 2,576,593 2,600,000 23,407 Infrastructure Upgrade Cap

A0195 CDEA GV series well upgrade North Vancouver 749,771 749,771 750,000 229 100%749,771 749,771 750,000 229

Total Completed Projects 3,857,069 3,857,069 4,450,000 592,931

Notes:(a) Competitive construction market resulted in a positive variance.(b) GVWD share - 59.80%: Maple Ridge share - 40.20%.(c) GVWD share - 39.18%: District of Maple Ridge share - 14.09%, City of Langley share 4.91%, Township of Langley share 41.82%.(d) Full contingency not required.(e) Additional electrical requirements.(f) Construction costs lower than estimated.(g) City of Surrey share - 33.72%, Township of Langley share - 66.28%(h) Reduction in scope.(i) GVWD share - 25%: TFN share - 75%.(j) South Delta Main No. 1 - Phase 1 & 2 Design and Construction.(k) Additional cost due to equipment procurement delays.(l) Actual Design cost lower than estimated.

(m) ACE is for 3 drains in 2017 and up to 3 additional drains in 2018, if required.(n) Port Mann Tunnel in service; post-closure work in progress.

UC-62

Schedule 2

5.6 Schedule 2 / 2017 April Summary Page 1 of 6 6/9/2017

Sewerage and Drainage District Capital Expenditures Liquid Waste As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

On-going Grand Totals 434,447,950 1,919,356,977 1,954,144,377 34,787,400 Completed Grand Totals 12,488,312 12,488,312 12,830,000 341,688

ON-GOING PROJECTS

SD Infrastructure Growth

Z0049 NLWWTP Phase 1 T2 Design Township of Langley 8,825,395 8,826,000 9,000,000 174,000 (2) 99% 2017 YZ0050 NLWWTP Ph1 T2 Construction Township of Langley 43,537,579 43,615,600 55,300,000 11,684,400 (2) 98% 2017 YZ0053 LGWWTP Interim CEPT Upgd Equip West Vancouver 1,295,492 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 99% 2017 YZ0056 AIWWTP Outfall Surge Design Delta 986,015 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 33% 2018 YZ0057 ANI Outfall Design Outfall Delta 10,399,690 14,000,000 14,000,000 - 74% 2020 YZ0058 LIWWTP Digestor No 3 PreDesign Richmond 12,484 600,000 600,000 - 2% 2017 N Project on hold pending results of consultant

study on thermal hydrolysis process which may change project scope.

Z0059 NWLWWTP Options Concept Design Township of Langley 145,163 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 6% 2018 YZ0064 NLWWTP Ground Improv Ph A Township of Langley 175 24,000,000 24,000,000 - 0% 2020 YZ0065 ANI Outfall Const Property Acq Delta 45,356 36,000,000 36,000,000 - 0% 2020 YZ0066 ANI Outfall Surge Construction Delta 29 22,000,000 22,000,000 - 0% 2020 YG0043 NSI Port Mann Twinning Surrey 9,947,876 13,100,000 20,600,000 7,500,000 (6) 48% 2018 N East Fraser Servicing Project has eliminated

the need for this projectG0046 N Nicomekl Trk Sewer No 2 Cons City of Langley 6,881,427 6,882,000 14,000,000 7,118,000 (1)(2) 99% 2017 YG0049 SSI K George Section Constr Surrey 29,674,328 30,000,000 30,000,000 - 99% 2017 YG0050 Katzie Pump Upgrade - Design Maple Ridge 167,247 200,000 200,000 - (4) 84% 2018 NG0055 NSI 104 Avenue Extension Surrey 4,786,305 6,800,000 6,800,000 - 70% 2017 N Protracted property negotiations.G0060 Maple Ridge FM Design Surrey 72,437 1,400,000 1,400,000 - (6) 5% 2017 N East Fraser Servicing Project has eliminated

the need for this projectG0061 NSI Roebuck Design Surrey 814,231 4,300,000 4,300,000 - (6) 19% 2017 N East Fraser Servicing Project has eliminated

the need for this projectG0062 Sperling PS Increase Pump Cap Burnaby 517,987 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 17% 2018 YG0063 Katzie PS Genset Design Maple Ridge 1,400 500,000 500,000 - (4) 0% 2019 NG0064 Katzie PS Design Phase II Maple Ridge - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - (4) 0% 2019 NG0065 Bby Lk Int N Sperling Sect Con Burnaby 5,603,625 5,706,000 6,500,000 794,000 (1)(2) 99% 2017 YG0066 Langley Pump Station Surrey 52,589 100,000 100,000 - 53% 2019 N Re-evaluating flow to the station G0067 SSI Johnston Rd Section Surrey 819,398 800,000 800,000 - 99% 2017 YG0069 Marshend PS - Concept Design Burnaby 7,270 125,000 125,000 - 6% 2017 YG0071 Hastings Sanitary TkSwr PreDes Burnaby/Vancouver 299,224 300,000 300,000 - 99% 2017 YG0072 Collingwood Trunk Sewer Design Vancouver 337,182 325,000 325,000 - 96% 2017 YG0073 Bby Lk N Int Philips Sect Burnaby 956,276 3,200,000 3,200,000 - 30% 2017 N Investigating alternative sewer alignments.G0074 Langley PS Pre Design Surrey 94,291 300,000 300,000 - 31% 2019 YG0075 Marshend PS Pre design Burnaby 199,932 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 20% 2018 YG0076 Queensborough Pumb Stat Desg New Westminster 189,157 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 13% 2019 N Re-evaluating flow to the station G0077 Sapperton FM Connections New Westminster 208,659 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 21% 2018 YG0078 North Road Trunk Swr Twinning Coquitlam 411,261 664,000 664,000 - 62% 2017 YG0079 SSI KGH OCF and Grit Chamber Surrey 240,040 13,500,000 13,500,000 - 40% 2019 YG0080 SSI Johnston Rd Pre Build Surrey 6,216,616 18,000,000 18,000,000 - 35% 2017 YG0081 Sap PS Equip and Construction New Westminster 9,158,515 76,400,000 76,400,000 - 12% 2019 YG0082 SSI Johnston Rd Detail Design Surrey 1,347,017 6,600,000 6,600,000 - 20% 2018 N Project delayed due to property acquisition

process.G0083 Port Moody PS Predesign Port Moody 172,455 600,000 600,000 - 29% 2017 YG0084 Hastings Sanitary Tk Swr Desgn Burnaby 252,414 1,304,000 1,304,000 - 19% 2018 YG0085 Golden Ears Xing Prel Design Maple Ridge/Township - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 0% 2018 YG0086 Golden Ears PS Prel Design Maple Ridge - 900,000 900,000 - 0% 2018 YG0087 NSI Flow Management PreDesign Surrey - 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 0% 2021 YG0088 North Road Trk Swr Phase 2 Des Coquitlam 16,062 938,000 938,000 - 2% 2022 YG0089 Hastings San Tk Swr No2 Design Burnaby - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 0% 2018 YG0090 Hastings Cassiar Intk Cnt Dsgn Vancouver 4,682 100,000 100,000 - 5% 2017 Y

Total Projects

UC-63

Schedule 2

5.6 Schedule 2 / 2017 April Summary Page 2 of 6 6/9/2017

Sewerage and Drainage District Capital Expenditures Liquid Waste As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Projects

G0091 Collingwood Trunk Sewer Const Vancouver - 3,590,000 5,090,000 1,500,000 (2) 0% 2018 YG0092 Albert St. Sewer Pre Design Port Moody 22,606 250,000 250,000 - 9% 2017 Y

144,719,886 376,225,601 404,996,000 28,770,399 SD Infrastructure Maint Cap

X0009 AIWWTP CCT ISO Gates Delta 510,254 750,000 1,000,000 250,000 (3) 99% 2017 YX0013 LNG Control & Inst Replacement West Vancouver 38,454 300,000 300,000 - 13% 2018 YX0014 AIWWTP CDAC Comp Replacement Delta 683,475 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 46% 2019 YX0016 IIWWTP Constr and Inst Replmt Richmond 767,821 2,750,000 2,750,000 - 28% 2018 YX0019 AIWWTP Clarifier Corr Ph 2 Delta 3,546,248 10,000,000 10,000,000 - 35% 2020 YX0025 IIWWTP Cogen Ctrls Repl Design Richmond 83,945 470,000 470,000 - 18% 2017 YX0026 Iona Solids-Construction Richmond 21,212,458 26,000,000 26,000,000 - 82% 2020 YX0028 NLWWTP 25Kv Sub Repl Des P2 Langley 93,520 650,000 650,000 - (4) 14% 2018 N Delay due to coordination with East Fraser

Servicing Study for NLWWTP ExpansionX0029 AIWWTP Galleries CDAC Design Delta - 395,000 395,000 - 0% 2020 YX0032 NLWWTP CDAC Upgrade Design Langley 40,647 650,000 650,000 - 6% 2017 YX0033 NLWWTP CDAC Upgrade Constructn Langley - 850,000 850,000 - 0% 2018 YX0034 AIWWTP Clarifr Corrosn P2 Cons Delta 1,986,720 12,000,000 12,000,000 - 17% 2020 YX0037 IIWWTP Thickener 1 Refurb Richmond 1,908,420 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 95% 2017 YX0043 IIWWTP Water Supply Pre Design Richmond 71,112 600,000 600,000 - 12% 2019 N Schedule adjusted to match project partner

(YVR)X0047 AIWWTP Stn Batt Repl Des Ph1 Delta 258,879 251,000 251,000 - 99% 2017 YX0048 LIWWTP RSP Isolation Gates Richmond 349,852 360,000 600,000 240,000 (1) 90% 2017 YX0051 AIWWTP Galleries CDAC Constr Delta - 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 0% 2020 YX0052 IIWWTP Maint and Admin HVAC Richmond 11,387 550,000 550,000 - 2% 2017 YX0053 IIWWTP Sed Weir Trough Const Richmond 20,083 1,550,000 1,550,000 - 5% 2017 YX0054 IIWWTP Sed Tough Repl Det Des Richmond 47,814 50,000 50,000 - 96% 2017 YX0055 VSA IIWWTP MCC PWR Dist Ph 2 Richmond 808 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0% 2017 YX0056 AIWWTP Stn Bat Repl Ph1 Con Delta 29,425 549,000 549,000 - 5% 2018 YX0058 IIWWTP Cogen Ctrls Repl Const Richmond - 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 0% 2019 YX0066 LIWWTP Fibre Optic Network Richmond - 120,000 120,000 - 0% 2018 YX0067 AIWWTP Fibre Optic Network Delta - 350,000 350,000 - 0% 2019 YN0046 Cost Alloc Billing Network Regional 4,981,956 5,230,000 5,230,000 - 95% 2018 N Delay in CSA certification of proposed

metering instrumentation.N0296 Gleneagles PS 2 5 Rehab Design West Vancouver 216,722 1,200,000 1,200,000 - 35% 2018 N Re-evaluating project scope due to new

population projections.N0318 FSA Sewer Repair Regional 1,520,614 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 76% 2017 YN0325 Gleneagles PS 1 Rehab West Vancouver 337,242 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 36% 2018 N Re-evaluating project scope due to new

population projections.N0336 IIWWTP 2009 MCC Replacement Richmond 1,339,742 1,375,000 1,375,000 - 97% 2017 YN0337 LGWWTP 2009 MCC Replacement West Vancouver 652,425 830,000 830,000 - 81% 2017 YN0350 NW Interceptor Grit Chamber New Westminster 207,846 250,000 250,000 - 83% 2017 YN0358 AIWWTP Clarifier Corrosion Rep Delta 1,698,407 1,946,000 1,946,000 - 99% 2020 YN0360 IIWWTP HVAC upgrade Richmond 1,982,024 2,095,000 2,095,000 - 99% 2017 YN0361 Marshend PS Rehab Construction Burnaby 696,890 7,000,000 7,000,000 - 10% 2020 N Rehabilitation work to coincide with capacity

upgrade.N0365 AIWWTP MCC Replacement Delta 473,941 2,844,000 2,844,000 - 17% 2020 YN0366 IIWWTP 12kv Feeder Replacement Richmond 883,486 897,000 897,000 - 98% 2017 YN0368 AIWWTP Gas Compressor Repl Delta 589,973 590,000 800,000 210,000 (3) 74% 2017 YN0378 LGWWTP Gas Condensate Removal West Vancouver 1,286,247 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 99% 2017 YN0383 AIWWTP GrvtyThckner DAFRepa Delta 1,685,301 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 84% 2017 YN0384 Iona MCC pwr dist ass rep 2010 Richmond 504,361 953,000 953,000 - 53% 2018 YN0387 Iona Solids Handling Design Richmond 4,408,292 4,500,000 4,500,000 - 99% 2018 YN0394 NSI Scour Construction Regional 378,315 455,000 995,000 540,000 (3) 80% 2017 YN0395 Gilbert Trunk Swr 2 Ph 1 Con Richmond 18,324,226 19,303,001 21,000,000 1,697,000 (1) 87% 2017 YN0396 Iona MCC Pwr Dist Ass Rep Fut Richmond 310,135 1,965,000 1,965,000 - 16% 2018 Y

UC-64

Schedule 2

5.6 Schedule 2 / 2017 April Summary Page 3 of 6 6/9/2017

Sewerage and Drainage District Capital Expenditures Liquid Waste As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Projects

N0397 LG WWTP Bar Screen Replacement West Vancouver 646,728 685,000 690,000 5,000 (2) 99% 2017 YN0398 AIWWTP WSS Line Replacement Delta 666,003 667,000 885,000 218,000 (2) 99% 2017 YN0411 Gilbert Trunk Swr No2 Ph2 Richmond 3,296,665 3,700,000 3,700,000 - 89% 2017 YN0421 Royal Ave PS - Predesign New Westminster 269,988 270,000 270,000 - 99% 2017 YN0426 Iona Grit System Upgrade Const Richmond 6,881,997 8,100,000 8,100,000 - 85% 2018 YN0430 Gilbert Trunk Sewer Ph2 Const Richmond 5,238,417 17,700,000 17,700,000 - 30% 2019 YN0438 Royal Ave PS Detailed Design New Westminster 100,339 430,000 430,000 - 23% 2017 YN0439 Baynes PS VFD Detailed Design Pitt Meadows 261,100 325,000 325,000 - 80% 2017 YN0443 Cloverdale VFD Repl Design Surrey 154,430 170,000 170,000 - 91% 2017 YN0444 Cloverdale VFD Repl Constructi Surrey 464,563 800,000 800,000 - 58% 2017 YN0448 LIWWTP PWD Replacement Richmond 14,643 600,000 600,000 - 2% 2018 YN0452 Glbrt Trnk Swr No 2 Ph3 Desgn Richmond 1,274 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0% 2018 YN0453 Glbrt Trnk Swr No 2 Ph4 Desgn Richmond - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0% 2017 YN0454 Cres Beach FM1 Pre Design Surrey - 500,000 500,000 - 0% 2017 YN0457 Katzie SSO Mgmt Prelim Des Maple Ridge 9,524 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 1% 2018 N Site selection process longer than expected.N0458 Golden Ears SSO Storage Design Maple Ridge - 10,500,000 10,500,000 - 0% 2019 YN0459 Baynes PS VFD Construction Pitt Meadows - 900,000 900,000 - 0% 2017 YN0461 Westridge FM- Prelim Design Burnaby 20,476 550,000 550,000 - 4% 2018 YN0462 NWI Annacis Sec 2 Pre Design Delta 541 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0% 2018 Y

92,166,154 176,125,000 179,285,000 3,160,000 SD Infrastructure Resilience Cap

X0008 LIWWTP Ammonia Removal ConcDes Richmond 147,451 200,000 200,000 - 74% 2017 YX0015 LIWWTP PE Bypass Gates Design Richmond 146,709 150,000 150,000 - 99% 2017 YX0017 AIWWTP Ammonia Removal PreDes Delta 17,209 600,000 600,000 - 3% 2017 YX0027 AIWWTP Cogen Prepurchase Delta 2,888,951 25,000,000 25,000,000 - 12% 2019 YX0031 LIWWTP Bypass Gate Constructn Richmond 299,744 300,000 300,000 - 99% 2017 YX0035 IIWWTP Sed Tank Eff Gates Cons Richmond 472,462 530,000 1,000,000 470,000 (2) 95% 2017 YX0044 IIWWTP Degester Gas Pipe Move Richmond 77,181 780,000 780,000 - 10% 2019 YX0049 AIWWTP SCL Flow Balance Const Delta 47,861 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 2% 2020 YX0050 AIWWTP SCL Flow Ctrl Const 1 Delta 58,991 500,000 500,000 - 12% 2020 YX0057 AIWWTP Cogen Backup Power Cons Delta 2,610,800 14,600,000 14,600,000 - 18% 2019 YX0062 ANI Automate inf Gates Const Delta - 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 0% 2020 YN0056 FSA Easement Acquisition Progr Regional 1,074,775 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 72% n/a YN0331 Highbury Siphon Repair Const Vancouver 9,542,975 12,000,000 12,000,000 - 90% 2017 YN0348 NLWWTP Outfall Township of Langley 115,834 1,500,000 1,500,000 - (4) 8% 2020 N Combined with treatment plant projectN0349 Highbury Overflow Facility Vancouver 19,795 110,000 110,000 - 18% n/a N Project scope under review. N0373 8th & Balaclava Data Collect'n Vancouver 95,961 100,000 100,000 - 96% 2017 N Delayed due to instrumentation sourcing /

certifications.N0386 AWWTP S Cogen Floor Rehab Des Delta 41,056 250,000 250,000 - 25% n/a N Project scope under review, likely to be

cancelled.N0388 Highbury Air Mgt Facilities Vancouver 1,374,077 7,000,000 7,000,000 - 20% 2018 N Waiting for city development permit.N0389 NW CSO Gates Design New Westminster 33,421 825,000 825,000 - 4% 2018 N Project scope under review.N0409 AIWWTP SCL Flow Balance Design Delta 400,348 450,000 450,000 - 99% 2017 YN0413 AIWWTP Cogen Backup Power Des Delta 8,108,053 9,000,000 9,000,000 - 90% 2018 YN0419 Sewer Seismic Upgrades Regional 393,750 500,000 500,000 - 79% 2017 YN0424 IIWWTP Sed Tank Effluent Gates Richmond 184,911 200,000 200,000 - 95% 2017 YN0427 NW Intercept Columbia Sect Des New Westminster 379,092 702,000 702,000 - 54% 2017 YN0432 8th Ave Interceptor Air Mngmt Vancouver 158,038 500,000 500,000 - 40% 2017 YN0433 SSI Delta Odour Control Study Delta 227,261 650,000 650,000 - 35% 2017 YN0434 Ocean Park TS Rehab Design Surrey 51,921 403,000 403,000 - 13% 2018 YN0435 Gleneagles FM Repl Constr West Vancouver 2,037,901 2,150,000 2,150,000 - 95% 2017 YN0436 NW Intercept Columbia Sect Con New Westminster 469,340 4,680,000 4,680,000 - 10% 2020 N Will proceed with remainder of the work

following completion of Sapperton PSN0440 VSA Emergency Power Pre Design Vancouver 101,819 400,000 400,000 - 25% 2017 YN0441 VSA Emergency Power Detail Des Vancouver 260,791 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 17% 2018 Y

UC-65

Schedule 2

5.6 Schedule 2 / 2017 April Summary Page 4 of 6 6/9/2017

Sewerage and Drainage District Capital Expenditures Liquid Waste As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Projects

N0442 VSA Emergency Power Const Ph 1 Vancouver 32,145 9,300,000 9,300,000 - 0% 2019 YN0445 FSA Sewer Seismic Upgrades Dsn Regional 7,639 400,000 400,000 - 2% 2018 YN0447 AIWWTP PST Wway Col Remed Con Delta 403,410 2,800,000 2,800,000 - 14% 2017 YN0449 Gleneagles FM Ph 2 Design West Vancouver 2,371 750,000 750,000 - 0% 2017 YN0450 AIWWTP Auto Infl Gates Predes Delta 192,670 200,000 200,000 - 99% 2017 YN0451 AIWWTP Auto Infl Gates Design Delta 274,425 500,000 500,000 - 55% 2017 Y

32,751,139 106,030,000 106,500,000 470,000 SD Infrastructure Upgrade Cap

X0012 IIWWTP Redund 12KV Fdr-Design Richmond 167,770 220,000 220,000 - 76% 2017 YX0021 NLWWTP SBS Storage-Design Township of Langley 79 250,000 250,000 - 0% n/a N Project scope under review pending results of

pilot study. X0022 AIWWTP Protection Relay Design Delta 156,999 160,000 160,000 - 99% 2017 YX0024 All WWTP PQM Network Predesign Regional - 30,000 30,000 - 0% 2017 YX0030 AIWWTP Protect Relay Purchase Delta 80 595,000 595,000 - 0% 2017 YX0036 IIWWTP Grit Chan Eff Gates Con Richmond 812,876 1,610,000 1,610,000 - 90% 2017 YX0038 All WWTP PQM Detail Design Regional 8,533 140,000 140,000 - 6% 2017 YX0039 All WWTP PQM Prepurchase Regional - 500,000 500,000 - 0% 2018 YX0041 IIWWTP Redund 12kV Fdr Const Richmond - 630,000 630,000 - 0% 2018 YX0042 IIWTP Biosolids Dewater PreDgn Richmond 89,761 800,000 800,000 - 11% 2021 YX0045 NLWWTP Disinfection System Langley - 250,000 250,000 - 0% 2018 YX0046 AIWWTP Protection Relay Constr Delta 19,147 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 1% 2018 YX0059 NLWWTP Outfall Concept Design Township of Langley 27 300,000 300,000 - 0% 2018 YX0063 IIWWTPBiosolids Dewater DesCon Richmond - 5,500,000 5,500,000 - 0% 2021 YX0064 ALL WWTP PQM Construction Regional - 2,200,000 2,200,000 - 0% 2019 YX0068 Chromatography Spectrometer Regional - 985,000 985,000 - 0% 2018 YN0023 VSA Statutory Right of Way Vancouver 432,540 670,000 670,000 - (7) 65% 2020 YN0065 NW Sewer overflow Oper Impr New Westminster 1,225,475 1,300,000 1,300,000 - 99% 2018 YN0344 Cloverdale SSO Treatment Surrey 16,023 150,000 150,000 - 11% 2018 N Project scope under review.N0345 Katzie SSO Treatment Maple Ridge 486,718 650,000 650,000 - 77% 2017 YN0367 Carvolth Sanitary Trunk Sewr 2 City of Langley 5,919,711 7,500,000 8,100,000 600,000 (1)(2) 73% 2017 YN0372 FSA Wastewater Meter Upgrades Regional 259,291 600,000 600,000 - 43% 2018 N Project scope revision.N0400 IIWWTP Dig 4 Roof Replacement Richmond 989,280 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 66% 2020 YN0401 Sperling PS Upgrade Constructt Burnaby 871,942 7,000,000 7,000,000 - 12% 2018 YN0402 NSSA Wastewater Meter Upgrades Regional 45,667 300,000 300,000 - 15% 2018 N Project scope revision.N0403 VSA-Wastewater Meter Upgrades Vancouver 286,006 300,000 300,000 - 95% 2017 YN0404 LISA-Waterwater Meter Upgrades Richmond 75,087 300,000 300,000 - 25% 2018 YN0410 AIWWTP Secondary Bypass Design Delta 408,668 450,000 450,000 - 91% 2017 YN0417 LIWWTP Second Incomer Feeder Richmond 262,792 250,000 250,000 - 99% 2017 YN0420 LGWWTP Sludge Thickener No.2 West Vancouver 3,129,917 3,380,000 3,380,000 - 99% 2017 YN0429 SSI Delta Section Rehab Design Delta 71,967 78,000 185,000 107,000 (3) 99% 2017 YN0437 SSI ND Section Rehabiltation Delta 31,256 2,100,000 2,600,000 500,000 (1)(2) 1% 2017 N Delayed due to Property Acquisition, now

proceeding.N0446 Westridge PS 1 and 2 Predesign Burnaby 236 240,000 240,000 - 0% 2017 YN0455 SSI Inf Ctrl RnR Gate Design Delta 12,855 135,000 135,000 - 10% 2017 YN0456 Big Bend Gates Pre Design Burnaby/Richmond/De 19,530 180,000 180,000 - 11% 2017 YN0460 Westridge PS1&2 Detail Design Burnaby - 560,000 560,000 - 0% 2019 YZ0060 IIWWTP Digest 4 Roof Mix Const Richmond 3,671,680 10,300,000 10,300,000 - 36% 2020 YZ0061 LIWWTP Pwr Reliability Pre Des Surrey 58,138 300,000 300,000 - 19% 2017 YZ0063 AIWWTP Secondary Bypass Constr Delta 211,442 1,275,000 1,275,000 - 17% 2017 YZ0067 LIWWTP Pwr Reliability Det Des Surrey - 900,000 900,000 - 0% 2017 Y

19,741,494 57,088,000 58,295,000 1,207,000 SD Infrastruct Relocation Cap

N8000 South Fraser Perimeter Rd Regional 317,806 318,562 333,562 15,000 (3) 99% 2017 YN8001 Hwy 1 Widen and PM Bridge Twin Regional 5,594,863 5,595,815 5,714,815 119,000 (3) 99% 2017 Y

UC-66

Schedule 2

5.6 Schedule 2 / 2017 April Summary Page 5 of 6 6/9/2017

Sewerage and Drainage District Capital Expenditures Liquid Waste As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Projects

5,912,669 5,914,377 6,048,377 134,000 SD Infr Sec Treat Upgrade Cap

X0001 VSA IONA WWTP Upgrade Design Richmond 2,513,601 16,500,000 16,500,000 - (5) 15% 2019 YX0002 LGS Program PM Decommissioning North Vancouver 19,504,372 49,300,000 49,300,000 - (5) 40% 2020 YX0065 LGSWWTP Conveyance Dsgn Cnstrc North Vancouver - 670,700,000 670,700,000 - (5) 0% 2022 Y

22,017,973 736,500,000 736,500,000 - SD Infr Opportunity Prgm Cap

X0010 AIWWTP IPS VFD Replacements Delta 418,484 1,050,000 1,050,000 - 40% 2018 YX0011 AIWWTP TF VFD Replacements Delta 292,148 870,000 870,000 - 34% 2018 YX0040 LIWWTP Biogas Clean up Richmond 627,291 10,400,000 10,400,000 - 6% 2018 YX0060 AIWWTP TF VFD Replacement Con Delta 1,285 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0% 2018 YX0061 AIWWTP IPS VFD Replacement Con Delta - 1,050,000 1,050,000 - 0% 2018 YN0347 Sapperton Pump Stn Sewer Heat New Westminster - 200,000 200,000 - 0% 2020 N Coordinating with Sapperton PS upgrade and

City of New Westminster schedule for District Energy system. Latest City study indicates heat would be needed by 2020.

N0380 VSA IIWWTP flared Biogas util Richmond 472,978 486,000 600,000 114,000 (2) 99% 2017 YN0381 LSA IRR Study Regional 191,777 250,000 1,000,000 750,000 (3) 60% 2018 YN0407 Evergreen LRTP Impacts Regional 567,109 568,000 750,000 182,000 (3) 99% 2017 YN0463 NSI PM Odour Corr Cont PreDes Surrey - 100,000 100,000 - 0% 2018 Y

2,571,072 15,974,000 17,020,000 1,046,000 SD Infr Annacis Stg 5 Exp Cap

Z0048 Annacis Stage 5 Phase 1 Delta 104,639,113 243,500,000 243,500,000 - 43% 2021 YZ0051 AIWWTP Stg 5 Ph 2 Pre Design Delta 4,790,942 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 96% 2017 YZ0055 ANI Stage 5 Ph 2 Detail Design Delta 1,723,359 17,000,000 17,000,000 - 10% 2020 YZ0062 ANI Stg 5 Exp Ph 2a Constructi Delta 3,414,148 180,000,000 180,000,000 - 2% 2026 Y

114,567,562 445,500,000 445,500,000 -

Total On-going Projects 434,447,950 1,919,356,977 1,954,144,377 34,787,400

COMPLETED PROJECTS

SD Infrastructure GrowthG0041 Sapperton Pump Station Design New Westminster 5,549,445 5,549,445 5,600,000 50,555 (2) 100%

5,549,445 5,549,445 5,600,000 50,555 SD Infrastructure Maint Cap

N0376 Iona Jetty North Slope Repair Richmond 4,717,664 4,717,664 5,000,000 282,336 (3) 100%

N0377 Gilbert Trunk Sewer Twinning Richmond 1,997,478 1,997,478 2,000,000 2,522 100%

6,715,142 6,715,142 7,000,000 284,858

SD Infrastructure Resilience Cap- -

SD Infrastructure Upgrade CapN0425 IIWWTP Grit Effluent Gates Des Richmond 223,725 223,725 230,000 6,275 100%

223,725 223,725 230,000 6,275

Total Completed Projects 12,488,312 12,488,312 12,830,000 341,688

Notes:(1) Project will be completed under budget - savings due to competitive pricing.(2) Full contingency not required.(3) Reduction in scope.

UC-67

Schedule 2

5.6 Schedule 2 / 2017 April Summary Page 6 of 6 6/9/2017

Sewerage and Drainage District Capital Expenditures Liquid Waste As of Apr 30, 2017

Total Total Expected8.8 Project Projected ACE / Projected Percent Year of Project on

Program Project Project Description Project Location Actuals Project Total Project Project Complete Project Schedule?ID To-Date Actuals Budget Variance Note Completion (Y/N) Comments

Total Projects

(4) Board endorsed East Fraser Servicing Study, work will now proceed in 2017.(5) Separate quarterly status reports for the Lions Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Upgrade project are being provided to the Utilities Committee and Board.(6) Project cancelled.(7) Funds will be spent if/when opportunity arises.

UC-68

APPENDIX B

Capital Project Status Information April 30, 2017

1. GREATER VANCOUVER WATER DISTRICT (Water Services)

Major GVWD capital projects are generally proceeding on schedule and within budget. The following capital program items and exceptions are highlighted:

i) Infrastructure Growth Program

• Coquitlam Intake No. 2 – A new intake, transmission tunnel and treatment facilities are proposed at the Coquitlam Reservoir to increase the supply and transmission capacity from this source. Options for the intake, conveyance and treatment facilities are being assessed under the project definition work. The goal is to complete the Project Definition Report by early 2018.

• Barnston/Maple Ridge Pump Station – This project comprises design and construction of a

new pump station to provide water to Maple Ridge via Haney Main No. 2 and Maple Ridge Main West, and to Langley and Surrey via the Barnston Island Main. Construction of the pump station is complete and the pump station is operational.

• Port Mann Main No. 2 (North) – This 2.5 km long 1.5 m diameter steel water main will twin

the existing Port Mann Main to meet growing water demand south of the Fraser River. Construction of the new main between the Cape Horn Pump Station and Reservoir near Mariner Way and the new Port Mann Water Supply Tunnel continues. Trenchless crossings of the Mary Hill Bypass, Lougheed Highway, and CP Rail lines are complete and installation of the watermain at these crossings is underway. Pipe installation in Colony Farm has been delayed to summer 2017. A request for additional funding will be brought forward to the Utilities Committee and Board in May.

• South Delta Main No. 1 Replacement – This project comprises replacement of the existing

water main with a new main on 52nd Street from 12th Avenue to 28th Avenue (Phases 1 and 2), and on 53rd Street from 28th Avenue to 34B Avenue (Phase 3). Phase 1 pipe installation adjacent to the new Tsawwassen Mills Mall is complete. Phase 2 pipe installation has been completed north of Highway 17 with the section south of Highway 17 to commence in May and be completed by September 2017. Phase 3 is currently under design.

• Fleetwood Reservoir – Phase 1 of the Fleetwood Reservoir project includes a 13.6 ML

reservoir, chamber, piping, access building and associated work located at Meagan Ann MacDougall Park in the City of Surrey. The conceptual/preliminary design was completed in March 2016. Detailed design is in progress and is scheduled to complete in summer 2017.

• Annacis Water Supply Tunnel – A 2.3 km long, 4.5 m diameter water supply tunnel is

required under the Fraser River to meet growing water demand south of the Fraser and to provide increased system resiliency. Preliminary design was awarded to Hatch Corporation

UC-69

and work began in January 2016. Preliminary design is now substantially complete and detailed design is expected to commence in July. Property acquisition for the shaft sites in New Westminster and Surrey continues.

• Capilano Main No. 5 (Stanley Park Section) – This 1.4 km long steel water main will replace the existing Capilano Main No 4 through Stanley Park to meet growing water demands and provide increased system resiliency. Preliminary design is currently underway with the assessment of route options and construction methods. Public engagement on the preferred option is planned for summer/fall 2017.

• Jericho Reservoir – Phase 1 of the Jericho Reservoir project includes a 19.55 ML

reservoir, chambers, piping and associated work located in the Township of Langley. The conceptual/preliminary design was completed in June 2016. Detailed design is in progress and is scheduled to be complete in August 2017.

ii) Infrastructure Maintenance Program

• Douglas Road Main No. 2 – Still Creek Section ‐ This project comprises approximately 2.5 km of 1.5 m diameter steel pipe with trenchless crossings of Highway 1, Still Creek and the BNSF rail line. The project team has engaged multiple stakeholders including the City of Burnaby and private landowners to determine the water main alignment. Preliminary design is anticipated to be complete in mid‐2017.

• Cleveland Dam Drum Gate Resurfacing Project ‐ Recoating of the Cleveland Dam drum

gate commenced in August 2016, however extreme weather conditions in mid‐October 2016 triggered activation of the project’s storm management protocol which required the contractor to demobilize and reactivate the drum gate for full operational service. The remaining work has been deferred to summer/fall 2017. Additional funding to complete the work was approved by the Board in March 2017.

• Fisherman’s Trail Bridge Crossing Project ‐ Associated Engineering is finalizing detailed

design for a new suspension bridge to cross the Seymour River and a vehicular bridge to cross Canyon Creek at the north end of Riverside Drive. Tendering for the construction of the bridges is anticipated for summer 2017.

• E2 Shaft Replacement – The E2 Shaft, which has controlled ground water pressures in the East Abutment of Cleveland Dam since the 1950’s is nearing the end of its service life and needs to be replaced by a system of horizontal drains. Up to six (6) production drains may be required. A contract to drill up to three (3) production drains was awarded to Jensen Drilling and work began in October 2016. The second of these three production drains is now complete.

iii) Infrastructure Risk Management Program

• Port Mann Water Supply Tunnel – The 1 km long, 3.5 m diameter water supply tunnel under the Fraser River between Coquitlam and Surrey is required to replace the aged and vulnerable Port Mann Main No. 1 marine crossing. Construction of the Port Mann Water Supply Tunnel is now complete and the tunnel went into service in mid‐February. Only landscaping at the shaft sites remains to be completed.

UC-70

• Braid Street Main No. 2 – This project consists of 2 km of 600mm diameter ductile iron pipe that will replace the existing Braid Street Main in the City of New Westminster. Detailed design is nearing completion and construction is anticipated to commence in fall 2017.

• Coquitlam Bulk Sodium Hypochlorite Conversion – This project comprises the conversion of the existing gaseous chlorine storage, feed, and injection systems with a new liquid sodium hypochlorite storage and feed system. The remaining work will be postponed to November 2017 as the existing gas system needs to remain in operation during the peak summer period. Work is scheduled for completion in 2nd quarter 2018.

• Second Narrows Water Supply Tunnel – A 1.1 km long, 6 m diameter water supply tunnel is

required under Burrard Inlet, between North Vancouver and Burnaby, to increase the reliability of supply in the event of a major seismic event and provide additional long term supply capacity. Detailed design is progressing well and is scheduled to be completed by late summer 2017. Permitting discussions are now underway with District of North Vancouver and City of Burnaby. The procurement process for construction is expected to commence in late summer 2017.

• Capilano Main No. 9 – This project comprises construction of approximately 1.9 km of

2.1 m diameter steel water main with associated appurtenances on Capilano Road in the District of North Vancouver. Installation of Capilano Main No. 9 was completed in March 2016 and the new water main was put into service in May 2016. Construction of the crossover chamber on Edgemont Boulevard commenced in November 2016 and is scheduled for completion in June 2017.

• Mackay Creek Debris Flow Mitigation – Detailed design for this project was awarded to BGC

Engineering Inc. Detailed design is progressing well, with 90% design drawings due in May. Tenders for the construction work are scheduled to be issued in Fall 2017.

• Marine Crossings – Phase 1 Conceptual Design ‐ In the fall of 2015 an assignment was awarded for Phase 1 conceptual design for two new marine water supply crossings; Cambie‐Richmond crossing of the north arm of the Fraser River between Vancouver and Richmond and the Haney Main crossing of the Pitt River between Port Coquitlam and Pitt Meadows. Draft conceptual design reports are now complete and under review.

• Clayton Reservoir – This project includes a new 22.5 ML water reservoir located at 72nd Avenue

and 190th Street in Surrey that will increase the storage capacity, meet current seismic standards and replace the existing Clayton Tank. Construction is well underway with completion anticipated by summer 2018.

iv) Infrastructure Upgrade Program • Queensborough Main ‐ Ewen Ave Replacement – This project consists of replacing the

existing Queensborough Main No. 1 with 2 km of new 600mm diameter ductile iron pipe. Phases 1 and 2 of the work are substantially complete with tie‐ins to the existing system anticipated to be completed in fall 2017.

UC-71

2. GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE DISTRICT (Liquid Waste Services)

Major GVS&DD liquid waste capital projects are generally proceeding on schedule and within budget. The following capital program items and exceptions are highlighted:

i) Infrastructure Growth Program

• FSA – Burnaby Lake North Interceptor – Construction of the twinning of the Sperling

Section including final repaving was complete in 2016. Preliminary design of Phase 2 (Sperling to Phillips Ave) and Phase 3 (Phillips to Piper Ave) and stakeholder engagement are underway. Alignment alternatives within Burnaby Lake Park and tunneling option under Winston Street were investigated. An assessment of alignment alternatives was completed including traffic, environmental and business disruption impacts and constructability challenges and a recommendation to select Winston Street Tunneling as a preferred option was made. Preliminary design of the preferred alignment will be finalized in 2017, to be followed by detailed design.

• FSA – South Surrey Interceptor Johnston Road Section – Construction of the twinning of Phase 1 started in March 2017 and includes installation of approximately 625m of 3050mm diameter corrosion resistant concrete sewer pipe, including appurtenances, in grade supported condition. Phase 1 is scheduled to be complete by the end of 2017. Phase 2 detailed design is underway and is scheduled to be complete by the end of 2017, to be followed by construction in 2018.

• FSA – Annacis Island WWTP Outfall – This project involves identifying solutions for the transient/surge impacts that may occur in the wastewater collection and treatment plant influent system in the event of a power outage, and assessing options to increase capacity of the outfall to support growth. Pre‐design work completed on the outfall recommends a single new 4m diameter tunneled outfall, approximately 1 km long at a depth of 40m. The Stage 1 Environmental Impact Assessment, including diffuser design/dilution modelling reports, has been reviewed by the Ministry of Environment. Detailed design of the outfall is about 60% complete. Construction is scheduled to start in 2019 and be completed in 2022.

ii) Infrastructure Maintenance Program

• LSA – Gilbert Trunk Sewer Twinning ‐ Construction of Phase 1 is substantially complete. Preliminary design work for Phases 2, 3 and 4 (from Hollybridge Road to the Lulu Island WWTP) is complete. Staff and the City of Richmond analyzed timing of adjacent City works, and developed a project schedule with Phase 2 construction starting in 2018, followed by Phases 3 and 4. The detailed design is underway, and will be completed by early 2018.

• VSA – Iona Island WWTP Solids Handling Upgrade – This project involves improving the existing grit removal and sludge screening systems, increasing sludge thickening capacity, and improving the digester mixing systems. Refurbishment of the existing sludge thickener was initiated in October 2015 and was completed on schedule by April 2016 and is back in full operation. Construction of the new Screening, Degritting and Thickening facility is 95% complete, with deficiency rectification underway, and Owner Commissioning scheduled for May/June 2017. The digester mixing contract started in November 2015, and is expected

UC-72

to be complete in 2019. Digester No. 4 gas proofing work is complete and the digester is back in service. The contractor is currently working on Digester No. 2.

• FSA – Annacis Island WWTP Secondary Clarifier Corrosion Repair – This project involves

replacing 12 secondary clarifier mechanisms that have been damaged by corrosion and are at the end of their useful life. This project also includes the installation of 12 new influent flow balancing gates, and replacement of 3 existing secondary bypass gates. Four mechanisms have now been replaced and work to replace the next three units and install 3 influent flow gates and bypass gates is underway. This work is expected to be complete by Fall 2017. A contract is being prepared for the 2018 and 2019 timeframe, in co‐ordination with the Stage 5 Expansion construction. The remainder of the units will be replaced in 2020‐2021.

iii) Infrastructure Risk Management Program

• FSA – Annacis Island WWTP Cogeneration System – This project replaces the existing cogeneration engines (cogens) with larger units in order to utilize increased digester gas production expected when Stage 5 Expansion is complete to generate additional electricity and heat to offset BC Hydro and natural gas import. The cogens are being supplemented by stand‐ by diesel generators (SDG’s) to provide a reliable backup power system during BC Hydro outage events. Detailed design is about 95% complete. Award of the pre‐purchased cogens and SDG’s occurred in 2015, following Board approved, and this equipment will be delivered in 2018 for installation. Constructability and installation strategies have been developed and reviewed with stakeholders. Four (4) construction bidders have been pre‐qualified to perform the removal of the existing cogens and installation of the cogens and SDG’s. The scope will also include supply and installation of new or modified electrical and air handling systems as well as ground improvements and structural upgrades to the existing cogen building. Construction tender documentation and drawings are presently being prepared for release in June with an anticipated award date in October. Project completion is anticipated to be in the summer of 2019.

iv) Infrastructure Upgrade Program

• FSA – Sapperton Pump Station – Construction is well underway following contract award in September 2016. Work is expected to be substantially complete in mid‐2019. As of April 30, the shoring system, consisting of 320 interlocked concrete piles and excavation for the new pump station structure, is in progress.

• FSA – Sperling Pump Station ‐ The Sperling Pump Station Upgrading Project provides for a

totally refurbished and expanded pump station by upgrading the existing aging and under capacity facility. NAC Constructors Ltd. is the successful tenderer and started construction in February 2017. Various chambers and a micro‐piling system for the new building are being constructed at present. The project is expected to complete within 2 years.

UC-73

• FSA – Carvolth Trunk Sewer – Remobilization of contractor to site confirmed. The remaining scope of work for this project involves approximately 180m of open cut trench construction of 900 mm dia. PVC complete with installation of a manhole, chamber and bypass. Following completion of the new sewer, the existing portions of the old system will be abandoned. Anticipated completion date for this work is July 2017.

• VSA – Iona Island WWTP Temporary Biosolids Dewatering Facility – The Iona Island

Wastewater Treatment Plant (IIWWTP), located in Richmond adjacent to the Vancouver International Airport, provides primary treatment from about 600,000 residents from the City of Vancouver, the University Endowment Lands, and portions of Richmond and Burnaby. The IIWWTP must be upgraded to secondary treatment levels by 2030 as required by regulations and the approved Metro Vancouver Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan. Decommissioning of the existing digested sludge lagoons and biosolids land drying area must occur prior to the construction of the new secondary treatment plant. In order to decommission the digested sludge lagoons and drying beds, a temporary mechanical dewatering facility will be needed to dewater on‐going production of biosolids. A feasibility study has been conducted by Black & Veatch that recommended the use of centrifuge technology and the delivery of the project using a design‐build (DB) methodology. An Owner’s Engineer RFP will be issued in May with an anticipated award date in July. The Owner’s Engineer will assist MV in developing the conceptual design further, establish the siting of the facility, prepare the DB project documents, and ensure compliance to the DB contract. The target facility completion date is December 2020.

v) Annacis Stage 5 Expansion Program • FSA‐ Annacis Island WWTP Stage 5 Expansion Phase 1 – This work involves expansion of

treatment process units including primary sedimentation tanks, secondary clarifiers, solid contact tanks and odour control facilities. The $252 million construction contract has been executed between Metro Vancouver and Graham and AECON Joint Venture in April 2017. Construction of the three‐story CDAC and Laboratory Building under a separate contract with Kenaidan is 95% complete.

21550684

UC-74

To: Utilities Committee From: Jeff Carmichael, Division Manager, Utility Research and Innovation, Liquid Waste

Services Date: June 1, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy RECOMMENDATION That the GVS&DD Board approve the Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy, which replaces the Sewer Heat Policy, as presented in the report dated June 1, 2017 and titled “Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy”. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to seek GVS&DD Board approval of the proposed Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy. BACKGROUND At its October 10, 2014 meeting, the GVS&DD Board passed the following resolution:

That the GVS&DD Board endorse the ‘Sewer Heat Policy’ as presented in the report titled Metro Vancouver Sewer Heat Policy dated August 25, 2014.

The Sewer Heat Policy applies only to projects that recover heat from untreated sewage that is diverted from GVS&DD sewers. Metro Vancouver staff are also evaluating opportunities to recover heat from treated effluent. An immediate opportunity exists at the North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant, where a decision to include effluent heat recovery is required by October 5, 2017. This type of in-plant opportunity is not covered by the Sewer Heat Policy. Revisions to the Sewer Heat Policy are being brought forward for the Board’s consideration to provide clarity in the methods to be used to evaluate and approve projects that recover heat from sewage, effluent or other sources of waste heat in the liquid waste system. The revisions to the policy include a new title, Liquid Waste Heat Recovery, to reflect the broader range of heat recovery projects addressed in the revised policy.

PROPOSED LIQUID WASTE HEAT RECOVERY POLICY All policy provisions included in the previous Sewer Heat Policy are incorporated into the new Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy (Attachment #1). The sections have been re-organized to follow current Board policy format. Some descriptive and procedural content has been removed and will be incorporated into a heat recovery project implementation guide. There have been no changes to the guidelines for sewer heat recovery. New guidelines for waste heat projects in treatment plants and outfalls have been added, in particular to establish guidelines for ownership and responsibilities and cost recovery principles.

5.7

UC-75

Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 4

The Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy was considered by the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee (REAC) at their June 2, 2017 meeting and their comments were incorporated into the proposed policy. An overview of the proposed policy which, if approved, would replace the Board Sewer Heat Policy is provided below. Ownership and Responsibilities The principle that responsibility and ownership of equipment is tied to property ownership is proposed to be applied to all types of projects. For projects that divert untreated sewage, GVS&DD will own and be responsible for a portion of the tie-in. For in-plant opportunities, GVS&DD will own and be responsible for heat recovery equipment within the wastewater treatment plant, since GVS&DD is the property owner. GVS&DD will determine ownership for projects along effluent outfalls on a case-by-case basis. Cost Recovery Principles In accordance with the previous Board policy, projects that divert untreated sewage from the collection system will follow the existing guidelines. GVS&DD capital costs for such projects are generally not large, and will continue to be recovered. The new policy proposes that GVS&DD will evaluate projects on a cost recovery basis considering costs incurred in implementing waste heat projects. The GVS&DD would not seek to profit from the provision of heat. Projects that recover waste heat from treatment plants and from effluent outfalls may be most cost effective by making significant infrastructure investments at the wastewater treatment plant or along the outfall. Such projects generally cost less and are less disruptive when they are coordinated with design and construction of a new facility or a major retrofit. For these opportunities, the GVS&DD will consider the business case for each project using established life cycle cost analysis and options analysis frameworks. Life cycle cost analysis includes consideration of the value of environmental benefits, such as the price of carbon. Grant funding will be pursued whenever possible to recover a portion of the capital costs. The allocation of remaining costs and benefits will be defined in a contract between GVS&DD and the purchaser of heat. Contracts for waste heat recovery projects will be approved by the Board before proceeding with implementation of the project. Types of Heat Recovery Projects Under the provisions of the proposed policy, heat recovery projects would include the following two categories:

1. Collection system projects: A sewer heat project that diverts untreated sewage from a GVS&DD sewer to a project site where heat is extracted by a third party.

2. Treatment plant and outfall projects: A waste heat recovery project that extracts heat

from treated effluent, equipment, processes or other sources of waste heat located within a GVS&DD wastewater treatment plant or along an effluent outfall pipe and transfers the heat to hot water that is then distributed to a third party.

UC-76

Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 3 of 4

GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION GOALS Projects that recover waste heat for beneficial use typically reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the region by displacing the use of natural gas. Staff have estimated that GVS&DD sewage and effluent contain enough energy to heat the equivalent of 700 high-rise buildings in the region. Implementing waste heat recovery projects will contribute to the goals of the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan and the Board Strategic Plan, which direct Metro Vancouver to use liquid waste as a resource and to evaluate opportunities for energy recovery. The Corporate Climate Action Plan also commits Metro Vancouver to recovering heat from wastewater collection and treatment systems for use by nearby buildings and facilities. ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVS&DD Board approve the Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy, which replaces the

Sewer Heat Policy, as presented in the report dated June 1, 2017 and titled “Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy”.

2. That the GVS&DD Board receive for information the report dated June 1, 2017, titled “Liquid

Waste Heat Recovery Policy” and provide alternate direction. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS If the Board approves Alternative 1 and adopts the Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy, GVS&DD will not be committed to any financial expenditures. Projects that are evaluated under the policy will require Board approval, including authorization of expenditures. Under the proposed policy, GVS&DD intends to recover costs incurred over the life of such projects. For collection system projects, all capital costs incurred by GVS&DD to enable access to untreated sewage will be recovered from the third party heat recovery project owner. Heat recovery projects within wastewater treatment plants and along effluent outfalls typically require a larger capital investment by GVS&DD and are associated with larger operations and maintenance costs. Each project will be evaluated using life cycle cost analysis and options analysis, which include the value of benefits such as greenhouse gas reductions. External grant funding may also be pursued to contribute to cost recovery. A contract will be established with the third party heat user for each project so that costs will be recovered over the life of the project. The Utilities Commission Act regulates the sale of heat. Waste heat projects brought to the GVS&DD Board for approval may require compliance with or approval for exemption from regulations through the British Columbia Utility Commission. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION A replacement policy to the current Board Sewer Heat Policy is being proposed to enable the GVS&DD to consider projects that recover heat from sewage, effluent or other sources of waste heat in the liquid waste system. The new policy intends to replace the Sewer Heat Policy and has been re-titled the Liquid Waste Heat Recovery to reflect this expansion in scope. All Board policy direction from the existing Sewer Heat Policy are retained in the new policy. Heat recovery projects can be categorized as collection system projects or as treatment plant and outfall projects. Sewer heat recovery falls under collection system projects. New guidelines have been

UC-77

Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 4 of 4

introduced related to heat recovery opportunities in wastewater treatment plants and along effluent outfalls. For all opportunities, ownership and responsibility are based on boundaries of property ownership. Opportunities will be evaluated using life cycle cost analysis and options analysis, which includes consideration of environmental benefits. Contracts will be established to recover costs over the life of the project. Waste heat recovery projects result in reduction of regional greenhouse gas emissions by displacing the use of natural gas. Approval of the policy does not commit GVS&DD to financial expenditures. Projects that are evaluated will require Board approval, including authorization of expenditures and associated contracts. Based on the opportunities presented under the proposed policy and its alignment with the Board Strategic Plan and the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan, staff recommend approval of Alternative 1. Attachment: Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Policy References: Utilities Committee report dated August 25, 2014, titled “Metro Vancouver Sewer Heat Policy”, accessible at http://www.metrovancouver.org/boards/Utilities/UC-Sept_11_2014-Agenda.pdf 21664949

UC-78

21510594 Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Page 1 of 2

LIQUID WASTE HEAT RECOVERY Effective Date: Approved By:

PURPOSE

To enable beneficial use of waste heat and associated greenhouse gas emission reductions from Metro Vancouver’s liquid waste system by external parties. DEFINITIONS

“Waste heat” is excess heat that is available from GVS&DD operations, including but not limited to heat from untreated sewage, treated effluent, equipment or processes. “Heat user” is a third party interested in accessing excess heat from GVS&DD’s liquid waste system. A heat user may be a member municipality or other entity. POLICY

Metro Vancouver is committed to pursuing strategies and actions that mitigate climate change. Waste heat recovery projects that displace the use of fossil fuels result in a reduction in regional greenhouse gas emissions. Recovering waste heat from the liquid waste system contributes to GVS&DD’s Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan goal of using waste as a resource.

This policy enables expedient access to waste heat where technically and financially feasible while ensuring that GVS&DD is able to convey and treat wastewater and meet all service objectives. This policy applies to situations where external parties request waste heat from GVS&DD’s liquid waste system and to situations where GVS&DD offers waste heat to interested external parties. COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS

Allocation of Waste Heat GVS&DD will allocate access to untreated sewage for heat recovery on a first-come first-served basis in response to requests by interested heat users, provided the proposed heat recovery project will not adversely impact GVS&DD services or other established heat recovery projects, as determined by GVS&DD review. If an established heat recovery project that is already in place or approved for development by GVS&DD could be impacted by a proposed new heat recovery project, the established project’s heating and/or cooling requirements will have priority. Private entities requesting access to waste heat must provide a letter of support from the host municipality demonstrating support and cooperation including allowance for works within municipal rights of way. Projects that access heat from municipal sewers do not require GVS&DD approval.

Ownership and Responsibilities GVS&DD owns a sewerage system and is responsible for sewage in its liquid waste system, including any associated resources such as heat. The boundaries of responsibility for heat recovery equipment and infrastructure are primarily tied to property ownership and will be defined in a contract between

BOARD POLICY ATTACHMENT

UC-79

BOARD POLICY

21510594 Liquid Waste Heat Recovery Page 2 of 2

GVS&DD and the heat user. GVS&DD will own and be responsible for the portion of the tie-in up to and including a shut-off valve on both the diversion and return lines. GVS&DD will consider an in-line heat recovery system built directly in a GVS&DD sewer if the system will not impair GVS&DD operations.

Cost Recovery GVS&DD will charge the heat user for all costs incurred to establish and maintain access to sewage. The value of sewage will be assessed using business case processes, including consideration of nominal value of sewage, and incorporated into sewage access contracts.

Environmental Attributes Benefits associated with greenhouse gas reductions (such as carbon offset credits) and the costs of administering those benefits will be allocated on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the costs and risks incurred by the parties involved in developing the heat recovery project. TREATMENT PLANT AND OUTFALL PROJECTS

Allocation of Waste Heat When GVS&DD identifies waste heat opportunities in wastewater treatment plants and effluent outfalls, GVS&DD will follow competitive processes in offering available waste heat to potential heat users, to ensure fairness and transparency. Ownership and Responsibilities The boundaries of responsibility for heat recovery equipment and infrastructure are primarily tied to property ownership and will be defined in a contract between GVS&DD and the heat user. GVS&DD will own and be responsible for waste heat recovery equipment and related infrastructure installed within its wastewater treatment plants and effluent outfalls, except in cases where ownership by an external party is deemed preferable to the GVS&DD. Cost Recovery Heat recovery projects within wastewater treatment plants and effluent outfalls will require capital investment by GVS&DD and will require ongoing operations and maintenance by GVS&DD. GVS&DD will recover the costs incurred in providing waste heat to external parties over the life of the project. GVS&DD does not seek to profit from the provision of heat. GVS&DD staff will evaluate heat recovery projects using established life cycle cost analysis and options analysis frameworks and will consider each project on a case by case basis. Benefits will include the value of avoided greenhouse gas emissions. A contract with the heat user will be established for each project that assigns the costs and benefits between GVS&DD, the heat user and other funding sources. Environmental Attributes Benefits associated with greenhouse gas reductions (such as carbon offset credits) and the costs of administering those benefits will be allocated on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the costs and risks incurred by the parties involved in developing the heat recovery project.

UC-80

To: Utilities Committee From: Ed von Euw, Senior Engineer, Policy Planning and Analysis, Liquid Waste Services Date: May 11, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street,

Corporation of Delta RECOMMENDATION That the GVS&DD Board approve an amendment of the Fraser Sewerage Area to include properties located at the Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street, Delta as shown on District Drawings SA-2376 Sheets 91 and 92. PURPOSE This report responds to a request from the Corporation of Delta for the GVS&DD Board to amend the Fraser Sewerage Area to include the properties in the Nordel Way Business Park and at 5224 88th Street in Delta as shown on DWG SA-2376 Sheets 91 and 92. BACKGROUND Metro Vancouver provides regional sewerage services to GVS&DD member municipalities. For a municipal property to receive sewerage services, it must be located within one of Metro Vancouver’s Sewerage Areas. Sewerage area boundaries are occasionally amended in accordance with Sections 31 and 32 of the GVS&DD Act, typically at the request of a GVS&DD member. Metro Vancouver received a council resolution from the Corporation of Delta requesting an amendment of the FSA to include the properties located in the Nordel Way Business Park and at 5224 88th Street in Delta as shown on DWG. SA-2376 Sheet 91 (Attachment 1) and Sheet 92 (Attachment 2). METRO 2040 CONSIDERATION Following adoption of Metro 2040 (the Regional Growth Strategy) in 2011, Metro Vancouver procedures regarding the amendment of regional sewer services are subject to the provisions of Metro 2040. Therefore any requests from member municipalities to amend a GVS&DD sewerage area must be presented to the MVRD Board for consideration of consistency with the provisions of Metro 2040. Once consistency with Metro 2040 has been established, the decision to amend the sewerage area rests with the GVS&DD Board, subject to technical considerations. The following summarizes the considerations for this boundary amendment:

• Metro Vancouver received a council resolution from Delta requesting an amendment of the FSA to include the properties located in the Nordel Way Business Park and at 5244 88th Street in Delta.

• On April 28, 2017 a report was presented to the MVRD Board (Reference 1). The Board resolved:

5.8

UC-81

Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street, Corporation of Delta Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 3

That the MVRD Board: a) resolve that the extension of GVS&DD sewerage services to the Nordel Way

Business Park is consistent with the provisions of Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping Our Future;

b) resolve that the extension of GVS&DD sewerage services to 5224 – 88 Street is ‘not inconsistent’ with the provisions of Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping Our Future and convey a letter to the Corporation of Delta expressing that each request for the extension of regional sewerage services will be assessed on its own merits, that proximity to an existing connection alone does not establish a rationale for extension, and that seeks confirmation from the Corporation of Delta that future land use changes are not planned or anticipated adjacent to the site; and

c) forward both Fraser Sewerage Area expansion applications to the GVS&DD Board for consideration.

GVS&DD CONSIDERATION A GVS&DD technical review, which included an examination of financial, technical and operational impacts, and effects on service levels, concluded that:

• There are no financial impacts on the GVS&DD as costs will be borne by the property owners. • GVS&DD analysis of the estimated flows projections shows the FSA sewerage system

currently has sufficient capacity to accept the projected flows. The GVS&DD will continue to work with Delta to determine timing and impact of increased flows for these and future developments in the area.

ALTERNATIVES

1. That the GVS&DD Board approve an amendment of the Fraser Sewerage Area to include properties located at the Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street, Delta as shown on District Drawings SA-2376 Sheets 91 and 92.

2. That the GVS&DD Board receive for information the report dated May 11, 2017, titled “Fraser

Sewerage Area Amendment – Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street Corporation of Delta” and provide alternate direction to staff.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no immediate financial impacts to the GVS&DD as connection costs will be borne by the property owners. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The Corporation of Delta has requested that the GVS&DD amend the Fraser Sewerage Area to include properties in the Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street in Delta. On April 28, 2017, the MVRD Board resolved that the Metro 2040 land use designations do not prohibit sewer services to these properties. GVS&DD analysis has shown there is sufficient capacity in the regional sewerage system and there are no financial impacts to the GVS&DD. Staff recommend that the FSA be amended to include the portions of the properties located in the Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street in Delta as shown DWG. SA-2376 Sheets 91 and 92.

UC-82

Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – Nordel Way Business Park and 5224 88th Street, Corporation of Delta Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 3 of 3

Attachments 1. DWG. SA-2376 Sheet 91 Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment Nordel Way Business Park 2. DWG. SA-2376 Sheet 92 Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment 5224 88th Street

Reference

1. MVRD Board Agenda - April 28, 2017, item E1.1 “Corporation of Delta – Proposed Amendments to the Fraser Sewerage Area Boundary”.

21592728

UC-83

ATTACHMENT 1

UC-84

ATTACHMENT 2

UC-85

To: Utilities Committee From: Mark Wellman, Senior Project Engineer, Policy Planning and Analysis, Liquid Waste

Services Date: May 11, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – 2919 and 2967 188th Street, City of Surrey RECOMMENDATION That the GVS&DD Board approve an amendment of the Fraser Sewerage Area to include the portions of the properties located at 2919 and 2967 188th Street, Surrey as shown on District Drawing SA-2376 Sheet 93. PURPOSE This report responds to a request from the City of Surrey for the GVS&DD Board to amend the Fraser Sewerage Area (FSA) to include additional portions of the properties at 2919 and 2967 188th Street in Surrey. BACKGROUND Metro Vancouver provides regional sewerage services to GVS&DD member municipalities. For a municipal property to receive sewerage services, it must be located within one of Metro Vancouver’s Sewerage Areas. Sewerage area boundaries are occasionally amended in accordance with Sections 31 and 32 of the GVS&DD Act, typically at the request of a GVS&DD member. Metro Vancouver received a council resolution from the City of Surrey requesting an amendment of the FSA to include portions of the properties at 2919 and 2967 188th Street as shown on DWG. SA-2376 sheet 93 (Attachment 1). METRO 2040 CONSIDERATION Following adoption of Metro 2040 (the Regional Growth Strategy) in 2011, Metro Vancouver procedures regarding the amendment of regional sewer services are subject to the provisions of Metro 2040. Therefore any requests from member municipalities to amend a GVS&DD sewerage area must be presented to the MVRD Board for consideration of consistency with the provisions of Metro 2040. Once consistency with Metro 2040 has been established, the decision to amend the sewerage area rests with the GVS&DD Board, subject to technical considerations. The following summarizes the considerations for this boundary amendment:

• A council resolution dated January 13, 2017 was submitted to the MVRD from the City of Surrey requesting an amendment of their Regional Context Statement (RCS).

• On April 28, 2017 a report was presented to the MVRD Board (Reference 1). The Board approved the following resolution:

That the MVRD Board accept the City of Surrey’s amended Regional Context Statement as submitted to Metro Vancouver on January 13, 2017.

5.9

UC-86

Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – 2919 and 2967 188th Street, City of Surrey Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 2

21596879

• The accepted RCS is noted as “generally consistent with Metro 2040”. The accepted RCS re-aligns the Urban Containment Boundary to encompass additional portions of the properties at 2919 and 2967 188th Street in Surrey, and re-designates portions of the properties from a Rural to a Mixed Employment regional land use designation. Metro 2040 does not prohibit the extension of sewer services within the Mixed Employment land use designation.

GVS&DD CONSIDERATION Portions of the properties at 2919 and 2967 188th Street are already contained within the Fraser Sewerage Area. On May 5, 2017, the City of Surrey requested an amendment of the FSA to include the additional portions of the properties aligning with the newly amended Urban Containment Boundary and changes to the regional land use designations. A GVS&DD technical review, which included an examination of financial, technical and operational impacts, and effects on service levels, concluded that:

• There are no financial impacts on the GVS&DD as costs will be borne by the property owners. • GVS&DD analysis of the estimated flows projections shows negligible impacts on the FSA

sewerage system. ALTERNATIVES

1. That the GVS&DD Board approve an amendment of the Fraser Sewerage Area to include the portions of the properties located at 2919 and 2967 188th Street, Surrey as shown on District Drawing SA-2376 Sheet 93.

2. That the GVS&DD Board receive for information the report dated May 11, 2017, titled “Fraser

Sewerage Area Amendment – 2919 and 2967 188th Street, City of Surrey” and provide alternate direction to staff.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no financial impacts to the GVS&DD as costs will be borne by the property owners. SUMMARY / CONCLUSION The City of Surrey has requested that the GVS&DD amend the Fraser Sewerage Area to include portions of the properties located at 2919 and 2967 188th Street in Surrey. On April 28, 2017, the MVRD Board resolved to amend Surrey’s Regional Context Statement. The amended RCS re-aligns the Urban Containment Boundary to encompass additional portions of the properties at 2919 and 2967 188th Street in Surrey, and re-designates portions of the properties from a Rural to a Mixed Employment regional land use designation. Metro 2040 does not prohibit the extension of sewer services within the Mixed Employment land use designation. GVS&DD analysis has shown there sufficient capacity in the regional sewerage system and there are no financial impacts to the GVS&DD. Staff recommend that the FSA be amended to include the portions of the properties located at 2919 and 2967 188th Street in Surrey as shown on DWG. SA-2376 Sheet 93. Attachments

1. Fraser Sewerage Area Amendment – DWG. SA-2376 Sheet 93 References

1. MVRD Board Agenda - April 28, 2017, item E1.2 “Consideration of the City of Surrey’s Amended Regional Context Statement”

UC-87

ATTACHMENT

UC-88

To: Utilities Committee From: Robert Hicks, Senior Engineer, Liquid Waste Services Department Date: June 5, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Biennial Report - Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan RECOMMENDATION That the GVS&DD Board direct staff to: a) submit the Biennial Report 2015-2016, dated May 2017, to the Ministry of Environment in

accordance with the requirements of the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan; and

b) post the Biennial Report on the Metro Vancouver website and arrange for the Utilities Committee to receive comments and submissions on the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan progress, as described in the Biennial Report, at the September 14, 2017 meeting.

PURPOSE To obtain Board approval of the Biennial Report 2015-2016: Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management: A Liquid Waste Management Plan for the Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District and Member Municipalities, May 2017, for submission to the Province in accordance with the requirements of the Metro Vancouver’s Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan (ILWRMP). BACKGROUND Metro Vancouver is required to provide a Biennial Report summarizing Metro Vancouver’s and its members’ progress in implementing their actions in the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan. This ILWRMP was approved by the Metro Vancouver Board and municipal councils in 2010, and subsequently approved by the Minister of Environment in May, 2011. With input from member municipalities, this 2015-2016 Biennial Report has been prepared for submittal to the Ministry of Environment by July 1, 2017. The report is structured into two volumes: • Volume 1: Metro Vancouver, This volume describes implementation progress on Metro

Vancouver’s ILWRMP actions. It also includes the most current data on the Performance Measures identified in the ILWRMP.

• Volume 2: Municipal Reports, This volume contains the implementation progress summaries

provided to Metro Vancouver by its members on their respective ILWRMP actions. PROGRESS SUMMARY Goal 1: Protect public health and the environment

Strategy 1.1 Reduce liquid wastes at their source

5.10

UC-89

Biennial Report - Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 2 of 4

• Member municipalities continue to work on reducing rainwater inflow and groundwater infiltration (I&I) into their sanitary sewers which is central to reducing chronic wet weather sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and maintaining sewer capacity dedicated to accommodate growth.

• Member municipalities and Metro Vancouver continue to use their respective sewer-use and pollution control bylaws to address local priorities and needs. New and updated bylaws, such as the Fermentation Operations Bylaw, help to protect municipal and regional infrastructure by managing new or changing discharges into liquid waste systems.

Strategy 1.2 Reduce wet weather overflows

• For 2015 and 2016, the Cities of Burnaby, New Westminster and Vancouver and the University Endowment Lands reported investing $72.9 million to separate 24,385 m of combined sewers, a key step to eliminating combined sewer overflows.

• Metro Vancouver is designing two SSO storage tanks: one in Maple Ridge and the other in Surrey. These facilities will reduce the likelihood of wet weather sewer overflows.

Strategy 1.3 Reduce environmental impacts from liquid waste management to a minimum

• Metro Vancouver is proceeding with the replacement of Lions Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant with the new North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant.

• Expansions for growth are underway for Annacis Island and Northwest Langley Wastewater Treatment Plants to ensure that the secondary treatment processes continue to meet performance requirements.

Goal 2: Use liquid waste as a resource

Strategy 2.1 Pursue liquid waste resource recovery in an integrated resource recovery context • Metro Vancouver is working with interested municipalities to develop projects to

recover heat from wastewater and treated effluent for use in district heating systems. • Metro Vancouver continues to recover electricity and heat from the digester gas

produced by the wastewater treatment process. This helps fulfil the plants’ energy demands.

Goal 3: Effective, affordable and collaborative management

Strategy 3.1 Manage assets and optimize existing sanitary sewerage operations • Metro Vancouver and municipalities continue to inspect and maintain their sewer

systems and invest in repair and replacement projects.

Strategy 3.2 Use innovative approaches and technologies • Projects at the Annacis Research Centre include innovative wastewater treatment

processes and technologies being investigated by universities and industries. Projects include ammonia removal technologies, phosphorous recovery, improved pollutant detection and other new technologies.

Strategy 3.3 Monitor the performance of the liquid waste system and impacts on the receiving environment

UC-90

Biennial Report - Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 3 of 4

• Metro Vancouver continues to successfully implement environmental monitoring programs as required by the Ministry of Environment. These include monitoring the receiving environment near treated wastewater discharges, the ambient environment of Boundary Bay, Burrard Inlet, Georgia Strait and the Fraser River, as well as the bacteriological quality of recreational waters.

Strategy 3.4 Provide resilient infrastructure to address risks and long-term needs

• Metro Vancouver continues evaluating its wastewater collection and treatment system for seismic resiliency and post-disaster performance with the objective to better define levels of post-disaster service and to inform future facility planning and design.

• Metro Vancouver continues to update and use region-specific climate change scenarios for sea level and rainfall patterns in its infrastructure planning and new design, such as for the new North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant project.

• Member municipalities have completed 86 Integrated Stormwater Management Plans and initiated implementation of these plans.

Strategy 3.5 Use collaborative management to address evolving needs

• The ILWRMP’s two municipal-regional-regulator staff forums, the Stormwater Interagency Liaison Group and the Environmental Monitoring Committee, continue to meet regularly and provide advice on environmental monitoring and stormwater issues.

ALTERNATIVES 1. That the GVS&DD Board direct staff to:

a) submit the Biennial Report 2015-2016, dated May 2017, to the Ministry of Environment in accordance with the requirements of the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan; and

b) post the Biennial Report on the Metro Vancouver website and arrange for the Utilities Committee to receive comments and submissions on the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan progress, as described in the Biennial Report, at the September 14, 2017 meeting.

2. That the GVS&DD Board receive for information the report dated June 5, 2017, titled “Biennial Report – Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan” and provide alternate direction.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no financial implications associated with Alternative 1 as the actions in the IWLMRP continue to be implemented and funded by the programs identified in the GVS&DD and municipal budgets. Alternative 2 may require changes to the Biennial Report 2015-2016 which may affect its timely submission to the Ministry of Environment given that July 1st is the reporting deadline.

UC-91

Biennial Report - Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan Utilities Committee Meeting Date: June 15, 2017

Page 4 of 4

SUMMARY / CONCLUSION Submission of a biennial progress report on ILWRMP implementation is required by the Ministry of Environment. The attached Biennial Report compiles for the period 2015 to 2016 the progress on LWMP action implementation from Metro Vancouver and member municipalities. Public comments and submissions on the Biennial Report will be received at a regular meeting of the Utilities Committee, as required by the Ministry of Environment. A brief progress summary of the goals and actions in the ILWRMP is provided in this report. Alternative 1 is recommended as it provides timely fulfilment of the biennial progress reporting requirements for the ILWRMP. References 1. Biennial Report 2015-2016: Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management: A Liquid Waste

Management Plan for the Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District and Member Municipalities, May 2017, Volume 1: Metro Vancouver Report (21709993)

2. Biennial Report 2015-2016: Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management: A Liquid Waste Management Plan for the Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District and Member Municipalities, May 2017, Volume 2: Municipal Reports (21714924)

21604561

UC-92

To: Utilities Committee

From: Tim Jervis, General Manager - Water Services

Fred Nenninger, Acting General Manager - Liquid Waste Services Date: June 6, 2017 Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Subject: Managers’ Report RECOMMENDATION That the Utilities Committee receive for information the “Managers’ Report”, dated June 6, 2017. 1. Utilities Committee 2017 Work Plan – Tim Jervis/Fred Nenninger Attached is the updated 2017 Work Plan indicating the status of the Committee’s key priorities together with the quarter that each is expected to be considered by the Committee. Attachment: 1. Utilities Committee 2017 Work Plan

5.11

UC-93

Attachment 1

Utilities Committee 2017 Work Plan

Priorities

1st Quarter Status 2017 Committee Priorities and Work Plan Complete 2017 GVWD and GVS&DD Capital Projects Complete Fisherman’s Trail/Riverside Drive Bridges - Status Update Complete Seymour Salmonid Society - 2016 Annual Report Complete Seymour River Rockslide Mitigation Update Complete Drinking Water Treatment Plant Residuals – Results of Cement Plant Trials Complete Collaborative Agreement with Thompson Rivers University for Biosolids Research Complete Authorization to Execute Project Agreement for Construction of Lions Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Project

Complete

Region-wide Baseline for Onsite Stormwater Management - Consultation Findings and Recommendations

Complete

Wastewater Industry Position Statement on Non-flushable and 'Flushable' Labelled Products

Complete

2017 Unflushables – Regional Campaign Update Complete Liquid Waste Services Environmental Management and Monitoring Initiatives Complete Municipal Requests for Sewerage Area Boundary Amendments (as applicable) Complete Contract Approvals – Contracts > $5M (as applicable) Complete Utility Policies (as applicable) Complete

2nd Quarter Regional Water Conservation Campaign – 2017 Update Complete 2017 Water Wagon Schedule & Sprinkling Regulations Education Materials Complete Water Supply Forecast and Consumption Update for Summer 2017 Complete Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures Complete GVWD Quality Control Annual Report for 2016 Complete Comprehensive Regional Water System Plan Update In Progress Coquitlam Intake No. 2 – Project Definition Update In Progress Water Shortage Response Plan Review In Progress Seymour Salmonid Society Contribution Agreement Complete Iona Island WWTP Secondary Upgrade Project Definition Complete Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan Biennial Report (2015-2016) In Progress Liquid Waste Development Cost Charge Bylaw Update In Progress Municipal Requests for Sewerage Area Boundary Amendments (as applicable) In Progress Contract Approvals – Contracts > $5M (as applicable) In Progress Utility Policies (as applicable) In Progress

UC-94

3rd Quarter Status LSCR Public Consultation Annual Update Pending Joint Water Use Plan Approval – Capilano and Seymour Watersheds In Progress Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures In Progress APEGBC Public Health and Environmental System Risk Management Plans In Progress Long Term Water Supply Strategy In Progress GVS&DD Environmental Management & Quality Control Annual Report 2016 Pending Special Meeting to Receive Public Input on the Integrated Liquid Waste and Resource Management Plan Biennial Report (2015-2016)

Pending

Northwest Langley Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project Update – Sustainability and Community Integration

Pending

2017 Regional Grease Campaign – Update Pending 2017 Unflushables Regional Campaign – Update Pending Municipal Requests for Sewerage Area Boundary Amendments (as applicable) Pending Contract Approvals – Contracts > $5M (as applicable) Pending Utility Policies (as applicable) Pending

4th Quarter

Update on Fisheries Initiatives in the Capilano, Seymour and Coquitlam Watersheds In Progress Summer 2017 Water Supply Performance In Progress 2018 Budget – Water & Liquid Waste In Progress Status of Utilities Capital Expenditures Pending Water Conservation: 2017 Campaign Results Pending Water Wagon Program & Water Restrictions Communications 2017 Results Pending Comprehensive Regional Water System Plan Update Pending Coquitlam Intake No. 2 – Project Definition Update Pending Regional Assessment of Residential Water Metering In Progress Northwest Langley Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Update -Project Definition Pending 2017 Behaviour Change Project on Unflushables and Grease Update Pending 2017 Regional Grease Campaign – Results Pending Municipal Requests for Sewerage Area Boundary Amendments (as applicable) Pending Contract Approvals – Contracts > $5M (as applicable) Pending Utility Policies (as applicable) Pending

UC-95