greatest challenges for ccp management and what to do about … · 2013. 5. 13. · greatest...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Wo
rld
of
Co
al A
sh
20
13
Gre
ate
st C
ha
lleng
es in
CC
P M
an
ag
em
ent
an
d
Wh
at To
Do
Ab
ou
t E
ach
P
rese
nte
d b
y:
Ma
rk R
oko
ff, P
E -
UR
S
Co
-Au
tho
red
by: J
ere
my H
eye
rly,
PE
an
d J
am
es M
ose
ley,
PE
– U
RS
Apri
l 2
4,
20
13
2013
Wo
rld
of
Co
al A
sh (
WO
CA
) C
on
fere
nce
- A
pri
l 22-
25, 2
013
in L
exin
gto
n, K
Yh
ttp
://w
ww
.fly
ash
.info
/
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ma
nag
ing
CC
P i
n t
od
ay’s
ma
rket
is n
ot
ea
sy t
o m
ap
!
2
Star
t:
You
are
h
ere
P
on
ds
Lan
dfi
lls
Be
ne
fici
al
Re
use
Op
era
tio
ns
and
M
ain
ten
ance
C
on
veya
nce
Was
tew
ater
End
: Su
cce
ssfu
l C
CP
M
anag
em
en
t
Calculating…
0%
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ma
nag
ing
CC
P i
n t
od
ay’s
ma
rket
is n
ot
ea
sy t
o m
ap
!
3
Star
t:
You
are
h
ere
P
on
ds
Lan
dfi
lls
End
: Su
cces
sfu
l CC
P
Man
agem
ent
Be
ne
fici
al
Re
use
Was
tew
ate
r
Op
era
tio
ns
and
M
ain
ten
ance
Ca
lc
ula
tin
g…
99%
Co
nve
yan
ce
Pre
se
nta
tio
n o
bje
cti
ve
: Id
en
tify
th
e c
ha
lle
ng
es
an
d s
ug
ge
st
gu
idan
ce t
o n
avig
ate
th
e r
ou
te t
o s
uccessfu
l C
CP
man
ag
em
en
t.
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Hig
he
st
Ris
ks
/Co
nce
rns i
n C
CP
Ma
nag
em
en
t
4
Exper
ienced
team
mem
bers
Poten
tial si
te im
pacts
Chan
ges to
CCP
and M
anage
ment
Seism
ic req
uirem
ents
for ne
w fac
ilities
and
closur
e
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Reg
ula
tory
Un
cert
ain
ty (
“R
eg
ula
tory
Pu
rga
tory
”)
5
Po
int
A
Po
int
B
Fed
era
l
Reg
ula
tio
ns
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Reg
ula
tory
Un
cert
ain
ty (
“R
eg
ula
tory
Pu
rga
tory
”)
6
So
luti
on
•U
nd
ers
tan
d a
nd
Eva
lua
te t
he
Ris
k (
de
ve
lop
a r
eg
ula
tory
ap
pro
ac
h)
•D
evelo
p c
onceptu
al p
lans (
identify
diffe
rences b
etw
een s
tate
and p
roposed
federa
l re
gula
tory
requirem
ents
; com
pare
with industr
y s
tandard
s)
•D
ete
rmin
e t
he im
pact
to the p
roje
ct
•D
evelo
p a
n a
ppro
ach t
o d
iscuss w
ith t
he r
egula
tory
agencie
s (
based o
n
prio
ritization)
•C
om
mu
nic
ate
(n
eg
oti
ate
) w
ith
Re
gu
lati
ng
Ag
en
cie
s
•U
nders
tand k
ey t
rigge
rs
•U
nders
tand s
chedule
constr
ain
ts
•U
nders
tand t
he r
egula
tory
fra
mew
ork
that th
e a
ction w
ill b
e c
arr
ied o
ut
thro
ugh (
e.g
., N
PD
ES
)
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Wa
ste
wa
ter
Ma
nag
em
en
t an
d T
rea
tme
nt
7
Dis
ch
arg
e
Lo
w v
olu
me
was
tew
ate
r s
tre
am
s
CC
P
Str
ea
ms
T
rea
tme
nt
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Wa
ste
wa
ter
Ma
nag
em
en
t an
d T
rea
tme
nt
8
No
Dis
ch
arg
e?
Dis
ch
arg
e
New
, co
ncen
trate
d w
aste
wate
r str
eam
s
Lo
w v
olu
me
was
tew
ate
r s
tre
am
s
CC
P
Str
ea
ms
EL
G
Tre
atm
en
t
CC
R
Ru
les
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Wa
ste
wa
ter
ma
na
ge
me
nt
an
d t
rea
tme
nt
9
So
luti
on
•In
clu
de
wa
ste
wa
ter
tre
atm
en
t a
pp
roa
ch
in
ove
rall C
CP
pro
gra
m
•A
n initia
l assessm
ent
of all
(exis
ting a
nd n
ew
)
waste
wate
r str
eam
s
•D
evelo
p e
valu
ation o
f tr
eatm
ent
altern
atives
and s
ele
ct
•In
clu
de t
hese r
esults into
overa
ll pla
nt
pro
ject
sch
edule
s
•R
eg
ula
tory
dri
ve
rs (
EL
G)
ma
y i
mp
ac
t
ove
rall a
pp
roa
ch
•R
esult in p
ond c
losure
(s)
and/o
r re
vis
ions t
o
CC
P M
anagem
ent
pra
ctices
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ad
he
ren
ce t
o s
ch
ed
ule
s (
pro
ject,
perm
itti
ng
,
co
nstr
uc
tio
n, e
tc.)
10
STA
RT
Be
gin
nin
g C
CP
Ma
na
gem
en
t
Co
nd
itio
n
Pro
jec
t 1
Co
mp
lete
Pro
jec
t 2
Co
mp
lete
EN
D
Fin
al C
CP
Ma
na
gem
en
t
Co
nd
itio
n
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ad
he
ren
ce t
o s
ch
ed
ule
s (
pro
ject,
perm
itti
ng
,
co
nstr
uc
tio
n, e
tc.)
11
STA
RT
Be
gin
nin
g C
CP
Ma
na
gem
en
t
Co
nd
itio
n
Pro
jec
t 1
Co
mp
lete
Pro
jec
t 2
Co
mp
lete
EN
D
Fin
al C
CP
Ma
na
gem
en
t
Co
nd
itio
n
2 ½
to
3 y
ears
Dry
CC
R H
and
ling
Infr
astr
uct
ure
3 t
o 4
yea
rs
No
n-C
CR
Was
tew
ater
Tre
atm
ent
1 t
o2
yea
rs
Des
ign
of
Fin
al C
losu
re
3 ½
to
5 ½
yea
rs
New
So
lid W
aste
Dis
po
sal F
acili
ty
End
of
w
et d
isp
osa
l
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ad
he
ren
ce t
o s
ch
ed
ule
s (
pro
ject,
perm
itti
ng
,
co
nstr
uc
tio
n, e
tc.)
12
STA
RT
Be
gin
nin
g C
CP
Ma
na
gem
en
t
Co
nd
itio
n
Pro
jec
t 1
Co
mp
lete
Pro
jec
t 2
Co
mp
lete
EN
D
Fin
al C
CP
Ma
na
gem
en
t
Co
nd
itio
n
2 ½
to
3 y
ears
Dry
CC
R H
and
ling
Infr
astr
uct
ure
3 t
o 4
yea
rs
No
n-C
CR
Was
tew
ater
Tre
atm
ent
1 t
o2
yea
rs
Des
ign
of
Fin
al C
losu
re
3 ½
to
5 ½
yea
rs
New
So
lid W
aste
Dis
po
sal F
acili
ty
End
of
w
et d
isp
osa
l
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
So
luti
on
•E
arl
y d
eve
lop
me
nt
of
pro
jec
t
sc
he
du
les
th
at
inc
lud
e k
ey
ele
me
nts
of
ad
jac
en
t p
roje
cts
(cre
ate
a m
as
ter/
pro
gra
m s
ch
ed
ule
)
•In
vo
lvem
en
t o
f re
gu
lato
ry
au
tho
riti
es
to
id
en
tify
“h
ard
sp
ots
”
an
d p
os
sib
le r
ule
ex
em
pti
on
req
ue
sts
•R
eg
ula
r s
ch
ed
ule
me
eti
ng
s t
o
ch
ec
k p
rog
res
s a
nd
en
forc
e
mile
sto
ne
s
•E
arl
y s
tart
on
pro
jects
…D
ON
’T
WA
IT T
ILL
TH
E L
AS
T M
INU
TE
Ad
he
ren
ce t
o s
ch
ed
ule
s (
pro
ject,
perm
itti
ng
,
co
nstr
uc
tio
n, e
tc.)
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Exp
eri
en
ced
Team
Mem
bers
(en
gin
eeri
ng
, co
nsu
ltan
t,
co
nstr
uc
tio
n, c
on
tra
cto
rs,
etc
.)
14
Sta
rt
•E
xp
eri
en
ce
d
Te
am
s
•S
op
his
tic
ate
d
Un
ders
tan
din
g
En
d
•E
ffe
cti
ve
an
d
Eff
icie
nt
De
sig
ns
(co
ns
tru
cti
on
an
d o
pe
rati
on
)
On
th
e jo
b
tra
inin
g
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Exp
eri
en
ced
Team
Mem
bers
(en
gin
eeri
ng
, co
nsu
ltan
t,
co
nstr
uc
tio
n, c
on
tra
cto
rs,
etc
.)
So
luti
on
•S
ele
ct
tea
m m
em
be
rs w
ith
de
mo
ns
tra
ted
ex
pe
rie
nc
e a
nd
exp
ert
ise t
o a
vo
id issu
es
•C
on
sid
er
co
mb
inin
g r
ela
ted
pro
jec
ts
an
d h
ave
on
e t
ea
m
•C
on
sid
er
se
lec
tin
g a
sm
alle
r n
um
be
r
of
qu
alifi
ed
co
ns
ult
an
ts t
o m
an
ag
e a
co
lle
cti
on
of
lik
e p
roje
cts
(id
en
tify
a
lead
co
nsu
ltan
t)
•C
on
sid
er
tea
ms
wit
h s
tro
ng
rela
tio
ns
hip
s w
ith
re
gu
lato
ry a
ge
nc
ies
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
16
Po
nd
Co
nd
itio
ns
A
ge
Op
era
tio
ns
Co
nstr
ucti
on
Pra
cti
ces
Po
ten
tial fo
r G
W im
pacts
(un
kn
ow
n c
ost
/
acti
vit
ies)
Po
ten
tia
l S
ite
Im
pa
cts
(to
Gro
un
dw
ate
r)
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Po
ten
tia
l S
ite
Im
pa
cts
(to
Gro
un
dw
ate
r)
So
luti
on
•U
nd
ers
tan
d p
ote
nti
al im
pacts
to
bett
er
pre
pa
re &
ma
na
ge
•
Pro
ject budgets
•P
roje
ct schedule
s
•R
egula
tory
involv
em
ent/
accepta
nce
•E
xe
cu
te a
str
ate
gic
pla
nn
ing
ap
pro
ac
h
•M
ulti-phased a
ppro
aches t
hat
anticip
ate
s
possib
le o
utc
om
es
•Im
ple
ment
evalu
ation
phase p
rior
to
investigations
•S
ee
k a
ba
lan
ce
be
twe
en
ris
k
ma
na
ge
me
nt
an
d p
roje
ct
de
ve
lop
me
nt
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
La
nd
fill
Po
nd
BS
1
BS
2
BS
3
Av
aila
bil
ity a
nd
Co
st
of
Mate
rials
(b
orr
ow
so
ils)
Bo
rro
w S
ou
rce
Fa
cto
rs:
So
il
Ava
ila
bil
ity
an
d
Qu
ali
ty
T
ran
sp
ort
ati
on
No
te:
On
e o
f th
e la
rge
st
co
sts
in
CC
P
ca
pit
al p
roje
cts
is
th
e s
oil
ma
teri
al n
ee
de
d f
or
en
gin
ee
red
so
il c
om
po
ne
nts
.
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Av
ail
ab
ilit
y a
nd
Co
st
of
Ma
teri
als
(b
orr
ow
so
ils
)
So
luti
on
•C
on
sid
er
alt
ern
ate
ma
teri
als
wh
ere
co
st
an
d
perf
orm
an
ce f
acto
rs f
avo
r th
e a
pp
roach
•B
eneficia
lly r
eusin
g C
CP
mate
rials
(re
vie
w e
xis
ting
pre
cedents
)
•G
eosynth
etics t
o r
epla
ce e
ngin
eere
d c
om
ponents
•C
on
sid
er
me
tho
ds
to
re
du
ce
so
il n
ee
ds
•E
arl
y e
va
lua
tio
n o
f p
ote
nti
al b
orr
ow
so
urc
es
(a
nd
se
cu
re p
rop
ert
ies
)
•C
onsid
er
qualit
y, a
vaila
bili
ty,
and t
ransport
ation
dis
tance
•C
onsid
er
min
ing a
nd p
rocessin
g o
f on
-site s
oft b
edro
ck
for
cert
ain
soil
needs
40
ac
res
28
0,0
00
CY
+
for
a 2
% s
lop
e
20,0
00 t
rucks
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Seis
mic
Req
uir
em
en
ts f
or
Ne
w F
ac
ilit
ies a
nd
Clo
su
re
20
F
E
Exis
tin
g
(an
d n
ew
)
facil
itie
s
desig
ned
for
tom
orr
ow
’s
sta
nd
ard
s
Exis
tin
g
facil
itie
s
desig
ned
for
lesser/
oth
er
sta
nd
ard
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Seis
mic
Req
uir
em
en
ts f
or
Ne
w F
ac
ilit
ies a
nd
Clo
su
re
21
Ne
w S
eis
mic
De
sig
n R
eq
uir
em
en
ts
(ma
y l
ea
d t
o s
ub
sta
nti
al s
tab
iliz
ati
on
sys
tem
s)
F
E
Exis
tin
g
(an
d n
ew
)
facil
itie
s
desig
ned
for
tom
orr
ow
’s
sta
nd
ard
s
Exis
tin
g
facil
itie
s
desig
ned
for
lesser/
oth
er
sta
nd
ard
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Seis
mic
Re
qu
ire
me
nts
fo
r N
ew
Fac
ilit
ies a
nd
Clo
su
re
So
luti
on
•M
ult
i-p
hased
ap
pro
ach
to
un
de
rsta
nd
im
pa
ct
to o
ve
rall
pro
jec
t
•A
s n
eed
ed
, co
nd
uct
sit
e-
sp
ec
ific
se
ism
ic e
ng
ine
eri
ng
eva
lua
tio
ns
to
re
du
ce
se
ism
ic f
ac
tors
•S
eek in
no
vati
ve a
nd
co
st
eff
ec
tive
so
luti
on
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Inc
lus
ion
of
a S
tra
teg
ic P
lan
nin
g P
roc
es
s
23
Re
gu
lato
ry D
rive
rs
Pla
nt
/ F
lee
t D
rive
rs
CC
P
EL
G
MA
TS
Age
Efficiency
Economic Value
Co
mp
lex P
lan
nin
g P
rocess -
- >
M
ake i
nfo
rmed
decis
ion
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Inc
lus
ion
of
a S
tra
teg
ic P
lan
nin
g P
roc
es
s
So
luti
on
•C
on
du
ct
Str
ate
gic
Pla
nn
ing
•D
eve
lop
an
un
de
rsta
nd
ing
of
all p
roje
ct
mile
sto
ne
s a
nd
in
ters
ec
tio
n p
oin
ts
•D
efine t
he p
roje
ct
scope a
nd a
ppro
ach
•E
sta
blis
h s
chedule
mile
sto
nes (
inclu
din
g
perm
itting)
and p
redecessor
activitie
s
•E
stim
ate
costs
/cash f
low
s
•R
eg
ula
rly d
isc
us
s p
roje
ct
sta
tus
,
ch
an
ge
s, e
tc. (i
mp
ac
t o
f re
late
d d
rive
rs)
•In
vo
lve
re
gu
lato
ry a
uth
ori
tie
s in
str
ate
gic
de
cis
ion
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Imp
ac
ts t
o E
xis
tin
g C
CP
Fac
ilit
ies
25
Mo
dif
ica
tio
n t
o
ex
isti
ng
fac
ilit
ies
G
rea
ter
Imp
ac
ts
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Imp
ac
ts t
o E
xis
tin
g C
CP
Fac
ilit
ies
26
Operational
Legacy Issues
Functional
Problems
Cu
rre
nt
Pla
nt
Ch
all
en
ge
s
Mo
dif
ica
tio
n t
o
ex
isti
ng
fac
ilit
ies
G
rea
ter
Imp
ac
ts
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Imp
ac
ts t
o E
xis
tin
g C
CP
Fac
ilit
ies
27
Operational
Legacy Issues
Functional
Problems
Cu
rre
nt
Pla
nt
Ch
all
en
ge
s
Mo
dif
ica
tio
n t
o
ex
isti
ng
fac
ilit
ies
G
rea
ter
Imp
ac
ts
Co
ns
ide
r:
•S
pil
lwa
ys
•S
itin
g C
rite
ria
•C
ap
acit
y
Re
qu
ire
me
nts
•C
on
ve
ya
nc
e
Me
tho
ds
•C
ap
ac
ity
•E
tc.
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Imp
ac
ts t
o E
xis
tin
g C
CP
Fac
ilit
ies
So
luti
on
•D
efi
ne
th
e e
xis
tin
g f
ac
ilit
ies
to
allo
w f
or
res
olu
tio
n a
nd
a r
evie
w
of
the r
eg
ula
tory
ap
pro
ach
•O
pera
tional challe
ng
es
•L
egacy issues
•F
unctional pro
ble
ms
•R
evie
w k
ey d
ec
isio
ns
an
d im
pa
ct
to a
dja
ce
nt
op
era
tio
ns
•S
tra
teg
ic a
nd
ea
rly p
lan
nin
g w
ill
an
tic
ipa
te im
pa
ct(
s)
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ch
an
ges
to
CC
P…
29
Ex
isti
ng
CC
P S
tre
am
s
To
Co
mp
ly w
ith
Reg
ula
tory
Re
qu
ire
me
nts
Po
wd
ere
d
Ac
tiva
ted
Carb
on
TR
ON
A
Oth
er
Pro
ce
ss
Ch
an
ge
s
Ne
w C
CP
Str
ea
ms
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
…a
nd
Ma
nag
em
en
t
30
New
CC
P S
tream
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Ch
an
ges
to
CC
P…
an
d M
an
ag
em
en
t
So
luti
on
•Id
en
tify
po
ss
ible
ch
an
ge
s a
nd
ex
plo
re o
utc
om
es
•Im
pacts
to the C
CP
str
eam
s
chara
cte
ristics
•E
valu
ate
managem
ent
pra
ctices
and t
he im
pact
of ch
anges
•B
eneficia
l re
use
•D
isposal sourc
e e
limin
ation
•E
xecu
te b
en
ch
scale
an
d f
ield
sc
ale
te
sti
ng
•E
xp
lore
all o
pti
on
s
-
Hig
hest
Ris
ks/C
oncern
s in C
CP
Managem
ent
Cop
yri
gh
t ©
20
13
UR
S
Exper
ienced
team
mem
bers
Poten
tial si
te im
pacts
Chan
ges to
CCP
and M
anage
ment
Seism
ic req
uirem
ents
for ne
w fac
ilities
and
closur
e
Su
mm
ary
32
Un
de
rsta
nd
ing
the
ch
all
en
ge
s
will h
elp
to
pre
pare
to
na
vig
ate
pa
st
ea
ch
, b
ut
•P
lan
nin
g
•P
rep
ara
tio
n
•E
va
lua
tio
n o
f
“b
ig p
ictu
re”
will a
ss
ist
in a
ll
are
as
.
-
Qu
es
tio
ns
& A
ns
we
rs
Ma
rk R
ok
off
, P
E
CC
P M
an
ag
em
en
t N
ati
on
al P
rac
tic
e L
ea
d
ma
rk.r
ok
off
@u
rs.c
om
21
6.6
22
.242
9 o
ffic
e
21
6.2
15
.541
9 c
ell