green fuels, green skies - ricardo plc
TRANSCRIPT
Green Fuels, Green SkiesStakeholder engagement session
Edward Hornsby, Low Carbon Fuels
13 April 2021
Public Presentation – V1.0 13/04/2021
Agenda
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
Item Lead
Introduction Giorgio Parolini (DfT)
GFGS Overview Teddy Hornsby (DfT)
FAQ sprint Teddy Hornsby (DfT)
GHG calculations walkthrough Richard Taylor (E4tech)
Q&A* All
*Please submit questions for the Q&A on the chat, these will be published by our moderator.
GFGS backgroundExisting government support for the sector:
• Future Fuels for Flight & Freight Competition (F4C), Advanced Biofuels Demo’ Comp’ (ABDC)
• Development Fuels subtarget of the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO)
Ricardo/E4tech feasibility:
• UK potential for the sector
• Main market barriers: high capital cost, technology risk, market uncertainty
• Proposed competition design
Stakeholder survey, winter 2020
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
GFGS objectivesKey objective:“Support the development of the UK SAF sector towards the deployment of innovative SAF production
technologies at commercial scale that are capable of reducing emissions from the aviation sector in the UK
within the near-term.”
- Get projects financeable/construction-ready & scale up UK SAF production past the technology “valley of
death”;
- Support a wide range of technologies where they demonstrate potential;
- Keep UK leadership in the emerging global sector.
Objectives for winning projects:
• Technology demonstration
• Fuel production
• Commercial potential
• Emissions reduction
• Project execution
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
GFGS design & expected timeline
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
We are here
Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22Phase Application Development Assessment Funding Period
Application development/networkingDocuments to complete:
Application form (provided) + Appendices:
A. Consortium letters
B. Technology evidence
C. Work plan
D. Project budget (template provided)
E. Projected cash-flow model (to be provided imminently)
F. Match funding details
G. Outline risk assessment (template provided)
H. GHG emissions estimate (template provided)
I. Development status documents
Networking/Consortium building:
Stakeholder list available on ricardo.com/GFGS - email [email protected] to be included.
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
Organisation Contact Name Contact Email100 words outlining your organisation’s relevant experience and collaboration interest:
Exxamplecompany Joe Bloggs [email protected] Exxample company is an SME gasification company with….
Assessment 1: eligibility screening
Category Eligibility Criteria
Pathways
The proposed SAF output must be capable of being blended with jet A-1.
•Ideally, this would involve fuel that can be used immediately without engine modifications, meeting the relevant jet fuel ASTM
specifications.2
•However, projects involving fuels that do not currently meet ASTM specifications are also able to apply, provided that the relevant
SAF pathway is currently engaged with the ASTM certification process, or there is clear evidence of the fuel’s future potential to be blended
with Jet A-1.
Greenhouse Gas
savings
First-of-a-kind commercial scale plants must demonstrate they will deliver a SAF output with a minimum 70% lifecycle GHG reduction in
comparison to a counterfactual of 94gCO2e/MJ (LHV). Demonstration plants do not have to meet this requirement but must demonstrate
how a future commercial plant will meet this threshold.3
TRLThe proposed plant must achieve Technology Readiness Level4 6-8 (small demonstration, large demonstration or First-Of-A-
Kind commercial scale).
Feedstock
Feedstocks (including the original feedstocks used to derive any intermediate fuels) should have the potential to qualify as a ‘development
fuel’ under the RTFO5:
•Waste feedstocks used must demonstrate compliance with the waste hierarchy. Segregated waste fats/oils are not eligible.
•Renewable power to liquids routes must demonstrate additionality of the renewable electricity used, as per RTFO guidance.
Location The proposed plant must be located in the UK.
Project Lead The project lead must be a UK registered company.
T&Cs Acceptance of the competition's grant offer letter terms and conditions.6
Eligible costs Funding cannot be used for previously funded activities or to replace private sector investment.7
Timescales Funding is only available for project work completed during the competition’s Funding Period.8
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
In order to be eligible to apply to the GFGS competition, a project must comply with the following minimum requirements:
Assessment 2: scoring process
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
The total score calculated by applying the weighting for each scoring criterion from the table.
- Projects must score 50%
- Projects may be asked to provide clarifications/invited to an interview.
- Due diligence by DfT will also be started during this period. Projects must pass this to receive funding.
- Extra information must be provided within 5 working days to support the scoring process.
Category Scoring criteria
Project
relevance (5%)1. Clarity of the project objectives and relevance to the competition objectives
Technical
approach (25%)
2. Credibility of the technological approach, clarity of the project data and justification with relevant pilot/demo plant data
3. Level of innovation and progress as a result of the proposed plant
4. Level of progression of the fuel pathway through ASTM certification process
5. Level and evidence of GHG emissions savings of the proposed plant (and expected GHG emissions savings at commercial scale if different)
Commercial
approach (20%)
6. Level of progression towards construction of a FOAK commercial plant as a result of the funded activities
7. Potential and case for economic benefits of the proposed plant during construction and operation, including CAPEX, OPEX, revenues of plant and
local economic benefits
8. Potential and case for benefits of future deployment of the technology within the UK, and benefits from export markets
Project
Implementation
(50%)
9. Credibility of current status of the project and readiness to proceed with funded activities
10. Confidence in skills and experience of the project team
11. Appropriateness of project management and governance structure and partners roles
12. Appropriateness and credibility of the project work plan
13. Detailed understanding of the project risks and their management
14. Credibility of detailed project costing for the funded activities
15. Strength of case for the DfT funding, including level of match funding leveraged and status of securing funding
Funding allocation
The competition board will employ a portfolio approach considering:
• Project scores;
• Breadth of technology pathways represented.
Up to £2m funding pot set aside to support feasibility studies across all TRLs
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
Feasibility Pre-FEED FEEDEngineering
&
Procurement
Installation
&
Commissioning
Operations
Up to £2m pot
Competition Scope
Project lifecycle
Some scoring focus
Funding period
Grant awards
• Based on boiler plate terms
• Project funds provided in arrears and on provision of evidence of work completed
Monitoring/Reporting
• Projects assigned a Monitoring Officer – “critical friend” and first point of contact
• Monthly reporting requirements
Funding period ends March 31, 2022
• Tied to HMT budget period
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
Advice from the ABDCGo Green Gas
• “Read the competition documents including feasibility study. The competition requirements and scoring criteria are very clear and are taken seriously.
• Engage with the DfT and advisors. Their culture is very collaborative.
• Be realistic. There is no such thing as a perfect project and its better to discuss and address weaknesses than ignore them.”
Nova Pangaea Technology
• “Openness and transparency is rewarded with support and pragmatism
• Milestones need careful thought and can be difficult to manage. But also understand that the DfT needs target achievements to pay out grant claims and also to manage government funding
• The “management process” does not involve extensive administration
• There is genuine interest in your technology and its success”
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021
Thank you
Contactsquestions: [email protected]
website: www.ricardo.com/GFGS
GFGS Stakeholder Engagement Session V1.0 13/04/2021