grid deployment board – 10 february 2004 - 1 gd lcg workshop goals give overview where we are...
TRANSCRIPT
Grid Deployment Board – 10 February 2004 - 1
GD LCG Workshop
• Goals• Give overview where we are• Stimulate cooperation between the centres • Improve the communication between the system managers on the sites• Focus on a small number of issues in the work groups (4-5)• Leave the workshop with tasks lists
• Overview in form of a plenary presentation with multiple speakers and strong participation of the sites
• Status of the sites (resources, utilization,common services…)• Transition from LCG1-LCG2 (problems, lessons learned, next steps)• Data challenges, first hand experience reported by a site manager• Operation and user support
– GOC and FZK user support reporting – Security and accounting
• Maintaining the LCG 2 code base– LCG's structure for this at the time of the workshop– open issues
Grid Deployment Board – 10 February 2004 - 2
GD LCG Workshop
• Working Groups • From code change to release
– Process for the chain from bug fix/ extension over integration, testing, certification and packaging to release distribution. How to tune the process to get best cooperation/sharing between the sites and ensure some level of quality? Who "owns" which part of the process.
• Storage in LCG2– With strong participation of the experiments
• Information System & Monitoring– One solution for both? Which solution? How could a transition work?
Questions concerning the schema should be addressed here too.• Documentation
– Writing the LCG cookbook. What has to be covered? How can we do this as a joint effort. The aim is to start collecting all our little bits of documentation and create an integrated handbook out of this. How to keep it up to date.
• System manager bonding session– Suggested by John Gordon to get the site managers into closer contact.
The weekly phone conference is a start, but nothing compares to direct interaction.
Grid Deployment Board – 10 February 2004 - 3
GD LCG Workshop
• Summary of the workgroups• Plenary presentation where each of the workgroup reports on
– outcome– tasks taken by which site
• This could be followed by a short discussion of additional open issues