grignard reaction with acetylene in thf

4
GRIGNARD REACTION WITH ACETYLENE IN THF Velio Pällin and Ants Tuulmets* Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia Abstract Kinetics of the reaction between acetylene and phenylmagnesium bromide were investigated in THF and also in the presence of triethylamine. The reaction proceeds through the formation of bromomagnesiumacetylene (1 I); its further reaction with PhMgBr providing bis(bromomagnesium)acetylene (1 2). The disproportionation equilibrium of I 1, leading to I 2 and acetylene, which is significant in Et 2 0 solutions, fails in THF. A moderate rate enhancing effect of triethylamine in THF solution was found. Introduction Acetylenic Grignard compounds can serve as intermediates in many syntheses of acetylenic compounds. The reaction of acetylene with a Grignard reagent affords a mixture of bromomagnesiumacetylene and bis-(bromomagnesium)acetylene, the ratio of products being predetermined by the reaction conditions [1-3]. In an earlier work [4] we investigated the kinetics of the reaction of acetylene with phenylmagnesium bromide. The measurements were conducted in diethyl ether and THF, and also in the presence of triethylamine. Catalytic amounts of triethylamine in the diethyl ether solution of phenylmagnesium bromide were found to largely accelerate the reaction [4,5], The moderate effect of triethylamine in THF solutions revealed distinctions in the donating ability of the bases [4,6]. However, the mechanistic interpretation of the results was based on a limited number of data and for that reason we decided to revisit the topic. Experimental The experimental procedure in this work was similar to that described in the previous paper [7]. The reaction was carried out at 20 °C in a thermostated 100 ml glass vessel, which was provided with a magnetic stirrer and inlets for the injection of the reagents and the sampling of the vapour above the reaction mixture. The reaction cell was purged thoroughly with pure argon. Then 50 ml of about 0.95 Μ solution of phenylmagnesium bromide, 5 ml of pure toluene (internal standard for GLC analyses) and a calculated amount of triethylamine were introduced. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 5 minutes to displace the inert gas, then the condenser was replaced with a silicon septum, the flask was cooled and placed into the thermostat. After the thermal equilibrium was set, the acetylene flow was turned on. A constant pressure of acetylene in the reaction cell was provided by an automatic gasometer with a continuous registration of the volume of consumed gas. The measured volumes of absorbed acetylene were reduced to normal conditions and transformed into moles. For convenient use of the data in kinetic calculations the molar amounts of consumed acetylene were referred to the volume of the reaction mixture (mol Γ ). Aliquots about 0.25 ml of the gas phase were periodically withdrawn from the reaction flask and analyzed by means of GLC. The concentration of benzene in the solution was calculated by making use of the calibration data obtained from the analyses of samples with known benzene content. Then kinetic curves of the evolution of benzene were plotted. The final concentration of benzene in the reaction mixture corrected for the benzene concentration in the initial solution was taken for the initial concentration of the Grignard reagent. Results and Discussion Various mechanistic schemes have been proposed for the reaction of acetylene with Grignard reagents in diethyl ether [8-10]. The results of our recent work [7] proved to be more concordant with the reaction scheme (l)-(4) including the primary mechanism proposed by Grignard et al. [8], supplemented with the reaction of bromomagnesium acetylene (2) first suggested by Jones et al. [10]. The main goal of this work was to determine whether the mechanism also holds for the reaction in THF solutions. 179 Brought to you by | University of Arizona Authenticated Download Date | 12/17/14 10:40 PM

Upload: ants

Post on 11-Apr-2017

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

GRIGNARD REACTION WITH ACETYLENE IN THF

Velio Pällin and Ants Tuulmets*

Institute of Organ ic Chemis t ry , Universi ty of Tar tu , Tartu, Estonia

Abstract Kinet ics of the react ion be tween ace ty lene and p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b romide w e r e inves t iga ted in T H F

a n d a l s o in t h e p r e s e n c e of t r i e t h y l a m i n e . T h e r e a c t i o n p r o c e e d s t h r o u g h t h e f o r m a t i o n o f b r o m o m a g n e s i u m a c e t y l e n e (1 I); its fur ther reaction with P h M g B r provid ing b i s ( b r o m o m a g n e s i u m ) a c e t y l e n e (1 2) . T h e d i sp ropor t iona t ion equi l ibr ium of I 1, leading to I 2 and ace ty lene , which is s ign i f i can t in E t 2 0 solut ions, fails in T H F . A modera te rate enhanc ing effect of t r ie thylamine in T H F solut ion w a s found .

Introduct ion A c e t y l e n i c G r i g n a r d c o m p o u n d s can se rve as i n t e r m e d i a t e s in m a n y s y n t h e s e s o f a c e t y l e n i c

c o m p o u n d s . T h e r e a c t i o n o f a c e t y l e n e w i t h a G r i g n a r d r e a g e n t a f f o r d s a m i x t u r e o f b r o m o m a g n e s i u m a c e t y l e n e and b i s - (b romomagnes ium)ace ty l ene , the ratio of p roduc t s be ing p r e d e t e r m i n e d by the reaction condi t ions [1-3].

In an earl ier work [4] w e invest igated the kinetics of the react ion of ace ty lene with p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e . T h e m e a s u r e m e n t s w e r e c o n d u c t e d in d ie thy l e the r and T H F , and a l s o in the p r e s e n c e o f t r i e thy lamine . Ca ta ly t ic a m o u n t s of t r ie thylamine in the diethyl e ther solut ion of p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e were found to largely acce le ra te the react ion [4,5], The m o d e r a t e e f f ec t of t r i e thy lamine in T H F s o l u t i o n s revealed d is t inc t ions in the donat ing ability of the bases [4,6]. Howeve r , the mechanis t i c in terpre ta t ion of the results was based on a limited number of data and for that reason we decided to revisit the topic.

Exper imenta l T h e exper imenta l p rocedure in this work was similar to that descr ibed in the previous paper [7]. T h e react ion was carried out at 20 °C in a thermosta ted 100 ml g lass vessel , which w a s p rov ided with

a m a g n e t i c s t i r rer and inlets for the in jec t ion of the r eagen t s and the s a m p l i n g of the v a p o u r a b o v e the reaction mixture . T h e reac t ion cell w a s purged thorough ly with pure a rgon . T h e n 50 ml o f abou t 0 . 95 Μ solu t ion of p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b romide , 5 ml of pure to luene ( in ternal s t andard for G L C a n a l y s e s ) and a ca lcu la ted a m o u n t o f t r i e thy lamine were in t roduced. T h e react ion mix tu re w a s r e f luxed fo r 5 m i n u t e s to d isp lace the inert gas , then the condenser was replaced with a sil icon sep tum, the f lask w a s coo led and placed into the t he rmos ta t . A f t e r the the rmal equ i l ib r ium w a s set, the ace ty l ene f l o w w a s tu rned on . A cons t an t p r e s su re of a c e t y l e n e in the reac t ion cell w a s prov ided by an a u t o m a t i c g a s o m e t e r wi th a c o n t i n u o u s regis t ra t ion of the v o l u m e of c o n s u m e d gas. T h e measured v o l u m e s of absorbed ace ty l ene w e r e r educed to no rma l c o n d i t i o n s and t r a n s f o r m e d into moles . For conven ien t use of the data in k inet ic c a l c u l a t i o n s the molar a m o u n t s of c o n s u m e d acetylene were referred to the vo lume of the reaction mix ture (mol Γ ).

A l iquo t s abou t 0 .25 ml of the gas phase were per iod ica l ly w i t h d r a w n f r o m the reac t ion f l a sk and ana lyzed by m e a n s of G L C . T h e concent ra t ion of benzene in the solut ion w a s ca lcula ted by m a k i n g use of the cal ibrat ion data ob ta ined f rom the analyses of samples with k n o w n benzene content . T h e n kinet ic cu rves of the evolut ion of benzene were plotted. T h e final concentra t ion of benzene in the react ion mix tu re cor rec ted for the benzene concen t ra t ion in the initial solut ion w a s taken for the initial concen t ra t ion o f the Gr ignard reagent .

Results and Discuss ion Var ious mechan i s t i c schemes have been proposed for the react ion of ace ty lene wi th Gr igna rd r eagen t s

in d ie thyl e ther [8-10] . T h e results of our recent work [7] p roved to be more c o n c o r d a n t wi th the reac t ion s c h e m e ( l ) - ( 4 ) inc lud ing the p r imary m e c h a n i s m proposed by Gr igna rd et al. [8], s u p p l e m e n t e d wi th the react ion of b r o m o m a g n e s i u m ace ty lene (2) first sugges ted by Jones et al. [10]. T h e main goal of th is w o r k was to de te rmine whether the mechan i sm also holds for the reaction in T H F solutions.

179 Brought to you by | University of Arizona

AuthenticatedDownload Date | 12/17/14 10:40 PM

Vol. 23, No. 3, 2000 Grignard Reaction with Acetylene in THF

R M g B r + H O C H 1 H C C M g B r + R H ( 1 )

H C = C M g B r + R M g B r 2 • B r M g C = C M g B r + RH ( 2 )

B r M g C ^ C M g B r + H C = C H 3 • 2 H C s C M g B r ( 3 )

2 H C = C M g B r 4 B r M g C ^ C M g B r + H O C H ( 4 )

The fol lowing differential equations can be written for the reaction scheme ( l ) - (4)

d[A]COns 7 — = k , [ A ] [ G ] + k 3 [ A ] [ I 2 ] - k 4 [ I l]2

d[RH] " " d t = k, [ A ] [ G ] + k 2 [ I 1] [G] ,

whe re [A] c o n s s tands for the molar amount of consumed acetylene referred to the vo lume of the react ion solution. [A], [G] and [RH] are the concentrat ions of acetylene, the Grignard reagent, and hydrocarbon RH, respec t ive ly . The symbol s I 1 and 1 2 denote Iotsitch complexes , b romomagnes iumace ty l ene and bis-(b romomagnes ium)ace ty l ene , respect ively. Grignard reagents of the type R C s C M g X and X M g O C M g X were first prepared by Iotsitch [11].

Pheny lmagnes ium bromide was employed as the Grignard reagent in our exper iments . Thus , hydrocarbon RH is benzene ([RH] = [Β]), and from the stoichiometry of the process we have for any point of t ime

[A]Cons = [ Π ] + [12] [B] = [ 1 1 ] + 2 [12],

therefore [11] = 2 [ A ] C 0 „ S - [ B ] [1 2] = [B] - [A]cons

and [G] = [B]„- [B],

where [B]„ denotes the benzene concentration at the end of the reaction (for determination see Experimental Section).

Since the concentrat ion of acetylene in the reaction mixture was constant dur ing the process, the differential equations can be presented as fol lows

d [ d t] C O n $ = k , ' [ G ] + k 3 ' [ 1 2 ] - k 4 [ I l]2

d[B] — = k , ' [ G ] + k 2 [ I l ] [ G ]

For a numer ica l integrat ion of the system of equat ions d i f fe rent ia l s (dc/dt ) we re replaced by intervals (Ac/At), and the rate constants were obtained by means of the method of least squares. The results revealed, in contrast to diethyl ether solutions, the statistical insignificance of the rate constants k3 and k4 for the reaction in THF. Consequent ly , only reactions (1) and (2) occur in T H F and the contr ibut ion of the disproport ionat ion equl ibr ium (reactions (3) and (4)) is negligible. This conclusion is well supported by the pract ice of the synthesis of b romomagnes iumace ty lene . While in diethyl ether it can be prepared f rom a Grignard reagent under an overpressure of acetylene, in T H F the Grignard reagent is usually added dropwise into a reaction vessel that bubbles in acetylene in THF at the rate of consumpt ion [3]. Hence, the reduced system of differential equations was solved and the obtained values for rate constants k | and k2 are presented in Table 1. The final concentrations of the Iotsitch complexes are also given in the Table.

Benson [12] has accompl ished a kinetic analysis of a formal scheme exactly cor responding to the react ion in ques t ion . It fo l lows f rom his calcula t ions that if [G] 0k 2 / [A]k | = 0.9, [I 1]*= = 0.5. In our

180 Brought to you by | University of Arizona

AuthenticatedDownload Date | 12/17/14 10:40 PM

V.Pallin and Ants Tuulmets Main Group Metal Chemistry

e x p e r i m e n t s the ra t io w a s equa l to 0 .86 and the f inal c o n c e n t r a t i o n of b r o m o m a g n e s i u m a c e t y l e n e (I 1) w a s found to be 0 .51 M. T h i s a l so c o n f i r m s the m e c h a n i s m d i scussed above .

T a b l e 1. I nd iv idua l ra te c o n s t a n t s 3 o f t he r eac t ion b e t w e e n a c e t y l e n e and p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e in T H F at 2 0 °C (k χ ΙΟ 4 ,1 mol"1 s"1).

T E A χ 1 0 2 b k, k2 Final c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ( M ) [ l l ] c [ I 2 ] d

0 3.71 ± 0 . 1 8 1 .17±0.18 0 .511 0 .201 0 . 0 7 3 .80±0 .21 1 .69±0.21 0 .502 0 . 2 1 9 19.8 9 . 2 5 ± 0 . 3 6 3 .52±0 .52 0 .540 0 .211 37 .5 14.6±0.6 5 .06±0 .37 0 .550 0 . 1 9 5 71 .6 2 4 . 8 ± 1 . 0 8 .80±0 .62 0 .549 0 .211 96 .8 32 .6±1 .4 11 .56±0.95 0 .505 0 .223

a the m e a n va lue s o b t a i n e d f r o m severa l runs, mo la r rat io of t r i e thy lamine re la t ive to the Gr igna rd reagen t , c b r o m o m a g n e s i u m a c e t y l e n e , d b i s - ( b r o m o m a g n e s i u m ) a c e t y l e n e .

T h e s e c o n d - o r d e r ra te c o n s t a n t k, f o r r eac t ion (1 ) is s eve ra l t i m e s g r e a t e r t han k 2 , s i m i l a r l y t o t h e reac t ion in d ie thy l e the r [7], w h e r e k | = 0 . 3 9 χ 10"4 1 mol ' 1 s"1 and k^ = 0.11 χ 10"4 I mol"1 s"1. H o w e v e r , t he rate c o n s t a n t s f o r t he reac t ion in T H F a re abou t ten t i m e s g rea te r than t h o s e in d ie thy l e the r . O b v i o u s l y the d e c r e a s e d ac id i ty of b r o m o m a g n e s i u m a c e t y l e n e in c o m p a r i s o n w i t h t he u n s u b s t i t u t e d a c e t y l e n e l o w e r s the r eac t ion ra te , and t he s t r o n g e r d o n a t i n g p o w e r o f T H F e n h a n c e s t he nuc l eph i l i c i t y o f t he G r i g n a r d r e a g e n t resu l t ing in g r ea t e r va lues of the rate cons tan t s .

O u r k ine t i c d a t a s h o w a m o r e s ign i f i can t cont ras t b e t w e e n the ca t a ly ses by t r i e t h y l a m i n e in T H F a n d d ie thy l e the r . W h i l e in d ie thy l e ther t r i e t h y l a m i n e exer t s a d r a m a t i c e f f e c t on the r eac t ion ra tes , pa r t i cu l a r ly for reac t ion (2) , r e l a t ive ly g rea t add i t i ons o f t r i e t h y l a m i n e to the T H F so lu t ion o f the G r i g n a r d r e a g e n t o n l y w e a k l y e n h a n c e t he r e a c t i v i t y ( T a b l e 1). T h u s , it can be i n f e r r e d tha t t h e v e r y s t r o n g B r o n s t e d b a s e t r i e t h y l a m i n e only s l ight ly e x c e e d s T H F by the L e w i s basici ty re la t ive to p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e .

It is o b v i o u s that an inc rease in s ter ic h i n d r a n c e causes a d e c r e a s e in the s o l v a t i n g ab i l i ty o f t he d o n o r r ega rd l e s s o f the in t r ins ic ( B r o n s t e d ) bas ic i ty . L i k e w i s e , an inc rease in the b u l k i n e s s o f the o r g a n i c g r o u p in the subs t r a t e h i n d e r s c o m p l e x i n g be tween the d o n o r and the m a g n e s i u m cen te r . It ha s been ea r l i e r s h o w n by o n e o f us [6] that the s e q u e n c e o f the re la t ive L e w i s bas ic i ty o f these d o n o r s w a s T H F > t r i e t h y l a m i n e > d i e t h y l e the r fo r e t h y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e , and T H F > d i e t h y l e t h e r » t r i e t h y l a m i n e fo r d i e t h y l m a g n e s i u m . Indeed , t r i e t h y l a m i n e on ly had a m o d e r a t e cata lyt ic e f f ec t on the react ion o f h e x - l - y n e wi th e t h y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e in d ie thyl e ther but d id not ca ta lyze the react ion wi th d i e t h y l m a g n e s i u m [13].

In s u m m a r y , w e h a v e s h o w n h o w the m e c h a n i s m o f the Gr igna rd r eac t ion wi th a c e t y l e n e d e p e n d s on the d o n a t i n g ab i l i ty o f the so lven t . T h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of t he d i s p r o p o r t i o n a t i o n e q u i l i b r i u m is s i g n i f i c a n t in d i e t h y l e t h e r s o l u t i o n s but p r a c t i c a l l y f a i l s in T H F . T r i e t h y l a m i n e r e a d i l y r e p l a c e s d i e t h y l e t h e r a t p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e but d o e s to a lesser ex ten t at a l k y l m a g n e s i u m ha l ides . T h e L e w i s bas ic i ty o f T H F is c o m p a r a b l e to that o f t r i e t h y l a m i n e wh i l e p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e is t he subs t r a t e but is s u p e r i o r to the bas ic i ty of t r i e t h y l a m i n e w h e n bu lk ie r G r i g n a r d r eagen t s a r e i nvo lved . T h u s , a p o w e r f u l c a t a l y t i c e f f e c t o f t r i e t h y l a m i n e can o n l y be o b s e r v e d in m a r g i n a l c a s e s such as the reac t ion o f p h e n y l m a g n e s i u m b r o m i d e in d ie thy l e ther .

A c k n o w l e d g m e n t

T h i s w o r k w a s s u p p o r t e d by the Es tonian Sc i ence Founda t ion , Gran t N o . 3058 .

R e f e r e n c e s [1] L.Brandsma, H.D.Verkruijsse, Syntheses of Acetylenes, Allenes and Cumulenes; Elsevier:

A m s t e r d a m , 1981. [2] W . E . L i n d s e l l , In Comprehensive Organometa/lic Chemistry, G . W i l k i n s o n , (Ed) , P e r g a m o n Press :

1982; Vol. 1, Chap. 4; Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Pergamon Press: 1995; Vol. 1, C h a p . 3.

[3] Handbook of Grignard Reagents; G . S . S i l v e r m a n , P .E .Raki ta , (Eds) , Marce l D e k k e r : N Y , 1996. [4] M . L o p p , E .Ot sa , V.Päl l in , A . T u u l m e t s , Org.React. (USSR), 13 ( 1976) 506 . [5] V .Pä l l in , A . T u u l m e t s , J.Organomet.Chem. 584 ( 1 9 9 9 ) 185.

181 Brought to you by | University of Arizona

AuthenticatedDownload Date | 12/17/14 10:40 PM

Vol. 23, No. 3, 2000 Grignard Reaction with Acetylene in THF

[6] A.Tuulmets , Org. React. (USSR), 11 (1974) 81. [7] V.Pällin, Ε. Otsa, A.Tuulmets, J.Organomet.Chem., 590 (1999) 149. [8] V.Grignard, L.Lapayre, T.Faki, Bull.Soc.Chim.Fr. 43(4) (1928) 931. [9] H.Kleinfeller , H.Lohmann, Ber.Deut.Chem.Ges. 71 (1938) 2608. [10] E.R.H.Jones, L.Skatteböl, M.C.Whit ing, J.Chem.Soc. 1956, 4765. [11] J.lotsitch, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 28(3) (1902) 922; 30(3) (1903) 210. [12] S .W.Benson, The Foundations of Chemical Kinetics·, McGraw-Hill : NY, 1960. [13] J .H.Wotiz, C.C.Holl ingsworth, R.E.Dessy, C.C.Lin, J.Org.Chem. 23 (1958) 228.

Received: January 20, 2000 - Accepted: January 26, 2000 -Accepted in revised camera-ready format: January 27, 2000

182 Brought to you by | University of Arizona

AuthenticatedDownload Date | 12/17/14 10:40 PM