gross - emotion regulation
TRANSCRIPT
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 1/14
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Copyright 1998 by the American Psychological Association, Inc.1998, Vol. 74, No. 1,2 24- 237 0022-3514/98/$3.00
Antecedent- and Response-Focused Emotion Regulat ion:Divergent Consequences for Experience, Expression, and Physiology
J a m e s J . G r o s s
S t a n f o r d U n i v e r s i t y
Usin g a process m ode l of emotion, a distinction b etw een antecedent-focused and response-focused
em otio n regu lation is proposed. T o test this distinction, 120 participants we re shown a disgusting
film wh ile their experiential, behavioral, and physiological responses we re recorded. Participants
were told to either (a) think about the film in such a way that they would feel nothing (reappraisal ,
a form of antecedent- focused em otion reg ulat ion) , (b ) behave in such a way that someone watching
them would not know they were feel ing anything (suppress ion, a form of response-focused emotion
regu lation ), or (c) watch the film (a control condition). Comp ared with the control condition, both
reappraisal and suppression we re effective in reducing emo tion-expressive behavior. However, reap-
praisal decreased disgust experience, whereas suppression increased sympathetic activation. These
results suggest that these 2 emotion regulatory processes may have different adaptive consequences.
W h a t h a p p e n s w h e n w e g e t s o a n g r y w i t h a n e r r a t i c d r i v e r
t h a t w e f e e l l i k e y e l l i n g a t h i m , y e t w e d o n o t ? O r w h e n w e
f e e l d o w n b u t w a n t t o b e i n g o o d s p i r i t s f o r a p a r t y ? O r w h e n
w e f i n d s o m e t h i n g o u t r a g e o u s l y f u n n y b u t n e e d t o s t i f l e o u r
l a u g h t e r d u r i n g a f o r m a l c e r e m o n y ? A t ti m e s s u c h a s t h e s e , w e
r e g u l a t e o u r e m o t i o n s . T h a t i s , w e a t t e m p t t o i n f l u e n c e w h i c h
e m o t i o n s w e h a v e , w h e n w e h a v e t h e m , a n d h o w t h e s e e m o t i o n s
a r e e x p e r i e n c e d o r e x p r e s s e d .
A s t h e s e e x a m p l e s s u g g e s t , e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n i s a r e g u l a r
f e a t u r e o f e v e r y d a y l i f e ( M o r r i s & R e i ll y , 1 9 87 ; R i p p e r e , 1 9 7 7 ) .
N i n e o u t o f 1 0 u n d e r g r a d u a t e s r e p o r t t h a t t h e y a l te r th e i r e m o -
t i o n s , a b o u t o n c e a d a y , a n d m o s t c a n r e a d i l y r e c a l l a r e c e n t
e x a m p l e ( G r o s s , F e l d m a n B a r r e tt , & R i c h a r d s , 1 9 9 8 ) . I n d e e d ,
a t t e m p t s a t re g u l a t i n g e m o t i o n s a r e s o c o m m o n t h a t w e t y p i c a l l y
t a k e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n f o r g r a n t e d , n o t i c i n g o n l y i t s a b s e n c e ,
s u c h a s w h e n a c h i l d t h r o w s a t e m p e r t a n t r u m ( T h o m p s o n ,
1 9 9 1 ) , a f ri e n d s h o w s t o o l i t t le h a p p i n e s s a t o u r g o o d n e w s , a
d e p r e s s e d c o l l e a g u e i s u n a b l e t o s t e m o v e r w h e l m i n g f e e l i n g s
o f sa d n e s s ( G r o s s & M u f i o z , 1 9 9 5 ) , o r w e l o s e o u r c o m p o s u r e
i n th e h e a t o f t h e m o m e n t a n d s a y t h i n g s w e l a t e r r e g re t .
C o n s i d e r i n g t h e u b i q u i t y o f e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n , o n e m i g h t
e x p e c t t h e o r e t i c a l a n d e m p i r i c a l a n a l y s e s t o a b o u n d . S u r p r i si n g l y ,
This research was suppor ted by Behavioral Science Track Award for
Rapid Transi t ion (B /ST AR T) Grant MH53859 f rom the National Ins t i-
tute o f Mental Heal th. I wou ld l ike to thank Paul Ekm an, O liver P. John,Richard S. Lazarus, Ja ne M. Richards, Jean ne Tsai, and Robert Zajonc
for their thoughtful comments on a draf t of this ar t icle and Rober t
W. Levenson for m aking his laboratory faci l i t ies avai lable. This ar t icle
benef ited f rom the comments o f both members o f the Emo tion Research
Gro up at its February 199 6 meeting at Vanderbilt University, Nashville,
Tennessee, and members o f the International Soc iety for Research on
Em otion at its August 199 6 meeting at the University of Toronto, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to James
J. Gross, Dep artment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, Cali -
fornia 94305-2130. Electronic mai l may b e sent via the Internet to
t h i s is n o t th e c a s e J M o r e o v e r , t h e t w o b r o a d l i t e ra t u r e s i n w h i c h
e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n h a s b e e n c o n s i d e r e d , o n e c o n c e r n e d w i t h p s y -
c h o l o g i c a l h e a l t h a n d t h e o t h e r w i t h p h y s i c a l h e a l t h , o f f e r r e m a r k -
a b l y d i v e r g e n t c o n c l u s i o n s a b o u t t h e c o n s e q u e n c e s o f e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n . I n t h e f o l l o w i n g s e c t i o n s , I f i r s t r e v i e w t h e s e t w o
l i t e ra t u r e s . I t h e n u s e a p r o c e s s m o d e l o f e m o t i o n t o d r a w a
d i s t in c t i o n b e t w e e n t w o f o r m s o f e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n a n d s u g g e s t
t h a t t h i s d i s t i n c t i o n m a y h e l p t o r e c o n c i l e t h e s e t w o l i t e r a t u r e s .
E m o t i o n R e g u l a t i o n : L e s s S t r e s s a n d B e t te r
P s y c h o l o g i c a l H e a l t h
C l i n i c a l t r a d i t i o n d a t i n g b a c k t o F r e u d h a s e m p h a s i z e d t h a t
p s y c h o l o g i c a l h e a l t h h i n g e s o n h o w a f f e c t iv e im p u l s e s a r e r e g u -
l a t e d ( F r e u d , 1 9 2 3 / 1 9 6 1 ) . T h i s h a s le d p s y c h o d y n a m i c r e -
s e a r c h e r s t o f o c u s o n t h e h e a l t h c o n s e q u e n c e s o f c h a r a c t e r i s ti c
e m o t i o n r e g u l a t o r y s t y l e s (e . g . , H a a n , 1 9 9 3 ; V a i l la n t & D r a k e ,
1 9 8 5 ) . R e c e n t l y , p r o p o n e n t s o f o t h e r t h e o r e ti c a l p e r s u a s i o n s
a l s o h a v e e l a b o r a t e d t h e v i e w t h a t p s y c h o l o g i c a l h e a l t h r e q u i r e s
t h a t e m o t i o n a l i m p u l s e s b e r e g u l a t e d p r o p e r l y . F o r e x a m p l e ,
B e c k , R u s h, S h a w , a n d E m e r y ( 1 9 7 9 ) a n d S e l i g m a n ( 1 9 9 1 )
h a v e a r g u e d t h a t c o g n i t i v e s t r a t e g i e s m a y b e u s e d t o p r e v e n t o r
a l l e v i a t e d e p r e s s i o n a n d B a r l o w ( 1 9 9 1 ) h a s a d v a n c e d a m o d e l
o f e m o t i o n d y s r e g u l a t i o n a n d a f f e c t i v e p sy c h o p a t h o l o g y .
B u t w h a t s u p p o r t i s t h e r e f o r t h e p r o p o s i t i o n t h a t e m o t i o n
r e g u l a t i o n h a s m e a s u r a b l e b e n e f i c ia l c o n s e q u e n c e s ? L a z a r u s a n d
c o l l e a g u e s p r o v i d e d s o m e o f th e f i rs t e v i d e n c e i n a n i n f l u e n t ia ls e r i es o f st u d i e s ( L a z a r u s & O p t o n , 1 9 6 6 ) . I n o n e r e p r e s e n t a t iv e
s t ud y , L a z a r u s a n d A l f e r t ( 1 9 6 4 ) s h o w e d s t u d e n t s a f i l m e d c ir -
c u m c i s i o n r i tu a l a n d m a n i p u l a t e d t h e a c c o m p a n y i n g s o u n d t r a c k .
S o m e p a r t i c ip a n t s h e a r d a s o u n d t ra c k t h a t h a d b e e n d e s i g n e d
t o m i n i m i z e t h e n e g a t i v e e m o t i o n a l i m p a c t o f th e f i l m b y d e n y -
i n g t h e p a i n i n v o l v e d i n th e s u r g e r y a n d e m p h a s i z i n g t h e j o y f u l
In the developmental literature, however, there has been a recent
surge of interest in em otion regulation (e.g. , Cam pos, Camp os, & Ba r-
ret t, 1989; Eisenberg et al ., 1995; Fox, 199 4; Garber & Dodge, 1991 ) .
22 4
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 2/14
TWO FORMS OF EMOTION REGULATION 225
aspects of the procedure. Other participant s heard no soundtrack
at all. Compared with the no-soundtrack condition, participants
who heard the soundtrack had slower heart rates, lower skin
conductance levels, and more pleasant mood ratings. These
findings suggested that leading participants to view the film less
negatively decreased the stressfulness of what otherwise would
have been a quite distressing experience.
Studies such as this one demonstrated that cognitive strategies
could reduce stress responses and suggested that such regulation
might have benefits for psychological health. This view has
been incorporated into theories of emotion (e.g., Frijda, 1988;
Lazarus, 1991; Plutchik, 1980), coping and stress reduction
(e.g., Katz & Epstein, 1991; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Meichen-
baum, 1985), delay of gratification (Mischel, 1974; Shoda, Mis-
chel, & Peake, 1990), and psychopathology (e.g. , Barlow, 1988;
Beck et al., 1979; Sayette, 1993). Despite its wide currency,
however, the view that cogni tive strategies may be used to de-
crease negative emotion has a surprisingly weak empirical foun-
dation. Since Lazarus' s pioneering studies, there has been at least
one failure to replicate (Steptoe & Vogele, 1986) and only one
successful replication (Dandoy & Goldstein, 1990). As Wegner(1994) demonstrated so elegantly in the realm of thought sup-
pression, attempts to influence ongoing mental processes may
have paradoxical or unintended effects. This suggests caution in
assuming that the cognitive control of emotion has uniquely, or
even primarily, salutary consequences.
Emotion Regulation: More Physiological Activation
and Worse Physical Health
With the advent of psychosomatic medicine, the impact of
emotion regulati on on physical health took center stage (Alexan-
der, 1939). Here, however, emotion regulation was cast not as
hero, bu t as villa in. Indeed, the notion that the regulation of
negative emotions could have deleterious consequences becamea cornerstone of the entire psychosomatic enterprise (Alexan-
der & French, 1946; Dunbar, 1954). The ch ronic inhi bition of
sadness and crying was thought to lead to respi ratory disorders,
such as asthma (Alexander, 1950; Halliday, 1937); the chronic
inhibition of affiliative tendencies was linked to gastrointestinal
disorders, such as ulcers (Alexander, 1950); and the chronic
inhib ition of anger was associated with cardiovascula r disorders,
such as hypertension (Alexander, 1939).
Although some of these hypotheses have fallen into disfavor,
others have remained popular, such as the view that chronic
hostility and anger inhibition may be linked to hypertension and
coronary heart disease (e.g., Friedman & Booth-Kewley, 1987;
Manuck & Krantz, 1986; T. W. Smith, 1992; Steptoe, 1993). In
addition, new hypotheses involving emotion regulation have
emerged, suggesting that emotion inhibition may exacerbate mi-
nor ailments (Pennebaker, 1990) and that inexpressiveness may
accelerate cancer progression (Fawzy et al., 1993; Gross, 1989;
Spiegel, Bloom, Kraemer, & Gottheil, 1989).
The theme that unites these hypotheses is that tight control
of negative emotions may adversely affect physical health. Just
how this might happen is not known, but the underlying premise
usually is that inhibiti ng emotion leads to acute increases in
physiological response parameters that may, over the long term,
do damage (Krantz & Manuck, 1984). Results of studies that
have examined the acute physiological effects of emotion regu-
lation empirica lly have been mixed (for a review, see Gross &
Levenson, 1993), but more recent work has shown that emo-
tional suppress ion leads to acute increases in sympathetic activa-
tion of the sort postulated by these models (Gross & Levenson,
1993, 1997).
Integrating the Two LiteraturesWhen placed side by side, the literatures on psychological and
physical health give the uncomfortable impression that emotion
regulation may benefit psychological health but harm physical
health. Are psychological well-being and physical well-being
really at odds with one another?
To address this issue, I have adopted the process model of
emotion shown in Figure 1. This model is a dist illation of major
points of convergence among researchers concerned with emo-
tion (e.g., Arnold, 1960; Ekman, 1972; Frijda, 1986; Izard,
1977; Lang, 1995; Lazarus, 1991; Levenson, 1994; Plutchik,
1980; Scherer, 1984; Tomkins, 1984). According to this consen-
sual model, emotion begins with an evaluation of external or
internal emotion cues. Certain evaluations trigger a coordinated
set of behavioral, experiential, and physiological emotional re-
sponse tendencies that together facilitate adaptive responding to
perceived challenges and opportuni ties. However, these response
tendencies may be modulated, and it is this modulation that
gives final shape to manifest emotional responses.
Clearly, this input-output model does not do--and is not
meant to do--full justice to the complexities of emotion. For
example, this model does not adequately represent the multifac-
eted evaluation and modulation processes. Neither does this
model capture the dynamic and recursive nature of emotion.
Nor does it provide sufficient means of representing differences
among emotions or differences among individuals. These limita-
tions notwithstanding, this model does suggest two major ways
in which emotions might be regulated.As shown in Figure 1, this model suggests that emotions may
be regulated either by manipulat ing he input to the system ( a n t e -
c e d e n t - f o c u s e d emotion regulation) or by manipulating ts output
( r e s p o n s e - f o c u s e d emotion regulation). Within these two broad
classes of emotion regulation, more fine-grained distinctions may
be made (see Frijda, 1986; Gross, 1998). For example, anteced-
ent-focused emotion regulation includes s i tua t ion se lec t ion , in
which one approaches or avoids certain people or situations on
the basis of their likely emotional impact; s i tua t ion modi f ica t ion ,
in which one modifies an environment so as to alter its emotional
impact; a t t e n t io n d e p l o y m e n t , in which one turns attention toward
or away from something in order to influence one's emotions;
and c o g n i t i v e c h a n g e , in which one reevaluates either the situation
one is in or one's capacity to manage the situation so as toalter one's emotions. Response-focused emotion regulation also
includes a multiplic ity of types, such as strategies that intensify,
d imin ish , pro long , or c u r t a i l ongoing emotional e x p e r i e n c e , e x -
p r e s s i o n , or p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s p o n d in g . 2
2 The distinction between antecedent- and response-focused emotion
regulation should not be confused with Lazarus and colleagues' distinc-tion between problem- and emotion-focused coping, a distinction re-
cently retired in favor of more specific coping strategies (Folkman &
Lazarus, 1988). Emotion-focused coping refers to efforts to regulatestressful emotion and thus is coextensivewith the superordinatecategory
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 3/14
226 GROSS
Emotional
Cues
E m o t i o n a l
Resp on se Ten d en c ies
-Behavioral
.Experiential.Physiological
IEmotional
Responses
Figure 1.
t
Antecedent-Focused
Emotion Regulation
(e.g., Reappraisal )
t
Response-Focused
Emotion Regulation
(e.g., Suppre ssion)
A consensual process model of emotion that highlights two major classes of emotion regulation.
Yet even this initial distinction between two broad classes of
emotion regulation may help to reconcile the two literaturesreviewed above. The psychological health literature might be
seen as concerned primarily with cognitive forms of antecedent-
focused emotion regulation, that is, regulation before the emo-
tion is triggered. The physical health literature, by contrast,
might be seen as concerned primarily with response-focused
emotion regulation that involves the inhibition of emotional
response tendencies once the emotion already has been
generated.
Might this model also be used to make more specific predic-
tions regarding these two forms of emotion regulation? In the
context of a potentially stressful situation, antecedent-focused
emotion regulat ion might take the form of reevaluating the situa-
tion so as to decrease its emotional relevance (see Lazarus,
1991; Scherer, 1984; C.A. Smith & Ellsworth, 1985). This
should decrease the extent to which emotion response tendencies
are activated, leading to lesser subjective, physiological, and
expressive signs of negative emotion than otherwise would have
been evident. Response-focused emotion regulation, by contrast,
should target response tendencies that have been produced once
the emotion is under way. For example, consider suppression,
defined as the conscious inhibition of ongoing emotion-expres-
sive behavior. Because regulatory efforts selectively focus on
behavior, we wou ld expect lesser emotion-expressive behavior.
The subjective consequences of hiding expressive behavior are
a matter of some dispute, but recent reviews (Gross & Levenson,
1993, 1997) suggest that suppression should have little or no
impact on subjective experience, at least in the context of anegative emotion.3 Because inhibitory pathways would be acti-
vated concurrently with the physiological response tendencies
associated with emotion, we might expect a mixed physiologica l
state. This state would include increased sympathetic activation
due to the additional task of suppressing behavioral response
of emotion regulation (at least for "stressful" emotions). By contrast,problem-focusedcoping refers to attempts to modify a troublesomeenvi-ronment and thus is one form of antecedent-focusedemotion regulation.
tendencies as they are generated (Gross & Levenson, 1993,
1997); decreased somatic signs of emotion, because these are
the target of suppression; and decreased heart rate, which is
influenced by somatic activity (Obrist , 1981 ).
The Present Study
The goal of the present study was to test the general proposi-
tion that "shutting down" an emotion at the front end would
have different consequences from shutting down an emotion
that already had generated powerful response tendencies. Thus,
the present study directly compared one form of antecedent-
focused emotion regulation, reappraisal, and one form of re-
sponse-focused emotion regulation, suppression, with a control
condition. Reappraisal was defined as interpreting potentially
emotion-relevant stimuli in unemotional terms (see Speisman,
Lazarus, Mordkoff, & Davison, 1964). Suppression was defined
as inhibiting emotion-expressive behavior while emotionally
aroused (Gross & Levenson, 1993).
A potent film stimulus known to elicit disgust was used. This
film's potency ensured that most participants would have the
desired emotional response tendencies (Gross & Levenson,
1995 ). However, it also increased the likelihood that some parti -
cipants would be overwhelmed. To decrease this possibility, all
participants first viewed a neutral and a disgusting film under
no special instructions, to acquaint them with the film materials
and procedures. Only then did they view a second disgusting
film, during which participants in the two experimental condi-
tions were to regulate their responding while control participantssimply watched the film.
Although emotion theorists agree that emotions involve
changes in the response domains of experience, expression, and
physiology, previous studies of emot ion regulati on typically
3 The opposite prediction would be made by the facial feedback hy-pothesis (FFH). However, recent reviews and empirical findingssuggestthat the FFH-inspirednotion that suppressionand exaggeration are oppo-
site ends of a single continuummay be mistaken (see Gross & Levenson,
1993, 1997).
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 4/14
T W O F O R M S O F E M O T I O N R E G U L A T IO N 2 2 7
h a v e s a m p l e d o n l y o n e o r t w o o f t h e s e d o m a i n s . O n e u n i q u e
c o n t r i b u t i o n o f t h i s s t u d y w a s t h e e x a m i n a t i o n o f a ll t h r e e d o -
m a i n s . B y d i r e c tl y c o m p a r i n g t w o f o r m s o f e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n
w i t h a c o n t r o l c o n d i t i o n , t h i s s t u d y t e s t e d t h r e e h y p o t h e s e s .
T h e f i rs t h y p o t h e s i s c o n c e r n e d e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r. I p r e -
d i c t e d t h a t b o th r e a p p r a i s a l a n d s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i c ip a n t s w o u l d
s h o w f e w e r b e h a v i o r a l s i g n s o f d i s g u s t th a n w o u l d c o n t r o l p a rt i -
c i p a n t s . I e x p e c t e d t h i s e f f e c t t o b e e v i d e n t w h e t h e r e x p r e s s i v eb e h a v i o r w a s a s s e s s e d i n d i s c r e t e t e r m s ( i . e . , s p e c i f i c s i g n s
o f d i s g u s t ) , d i m e n s i o n a l t e r m s ( i .e . , t h e i n t e n s i ty o f o v e r a ll
e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n d i n g ) , o r g l o b a l t e r m s ( i .e . , o v e r a l l a c ti v i ty
l e v e l s ) . B e c a u s e o f t h e w a y I o p e r a t i o n a l i z e d r e a p p r a is a l a n d
s u p p r e s s i o n , I d i d n o t e x p e c t e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n p a r t i c i p an t s t o
l o o k a w a y f r o m t h e f i l m o r a v e r t t h e i r g a z e t o a g r e a t e r e x t e n t
t h a n c o n t r o l p a rt i c ip a n t s ( w h i c h w o u l d r e p r e s e n t y e t a n o t h e r
f o r m o f e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n ) .
T h e s e c o n d h y p o t h e s i s c o n c e r n e d s u b j e ct i v e e x p e ri e n c e . I ex -
p e c t e d t h a t r e a p p r a i s a l p a r t i c i p a n t s w o u l d r e p o r t l e s s s u b j e c t i v e
e x p e r i e n c e o f e m o t i o n t h a n c o n t r o l p a r t i ci p a n t s; i n t h e c o n t e x t
o f a f i l m th a t s p e c i f i c a l l y t a r g e t e d d i s g u s t s u b j e c t i v e e x p e r i e n c e ,
I e x p e c t e d t h a t t h e s e r e d u c t i o n s w o u l d b e s p e c i f i c t o d i s g u s t .
B y c o n t r a s t , o n t h e b a s i s o f p r i o r f i n d i n g s , I p r e d i c t e d t h a t
s u p p r e s s i o n a n d c o n t r o l p a r t i c i p a n ts w o u l d r e p o r t e q u iv a l e n t
e x p e r i e n c e o f d i s g u s t.
T h e t h i r d h y p o t h e s i s c o n c e r n e d p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e sp o n d i n g .
H e r e , m y e x p e c t a t i o n w a s t h a t r e a p p r a i s a l p a r t i c i p a n t s w o u l d
s h o w l e s s s y m p a t h e t i c a c t i v a t i o n ( a s m e a s u r e d b y f i n g e r p u l s e
a m p l i t u d e , f i n g e r t e m p e r a t u r e , a n d s k i n c o n d u c t a n c e ) , l e s s s o -
m a t i c a c t i v it y , a n d l o w e r h e a r t r a te s t h a n c o n t r o l p a r t i c i p a n t s .
B y c o n t ra s t , b e c a u s e I c o n c e p t u a l i z e s u p p r e s s i o n a s i n v o l v i n g
t h e a c t iv a t io n o f i n h i b i to r y p r o c e s s e s o v e r a n d a b o v e t h e o n g o i n g
e m o t i o n , I e x p e c t e d s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i c i p a n t s t o e v i d e n c e a
m i x e d p h y s i o l o g i c a l p a t te r n , c h a r a c t e ri z e d b y g r e a te r s y m p a -
t h e t i c a c t i v a t i o n t h a n c o n t r o l p a r t i c i p a n t s b u t l e s s s o m a t i c a n d
h e a r t r a t e r e a c t i v i t y .
M e ~ o d
O v e r v i e w
P a r t i c ip a n t s w a t c h e d a d i s g u s t - e l i c i ti n g f i lm u n d e r o n e o f t h r e e c o n d i -
t i o n s . In t h e r e a p p r a is a l c o n d i t i o n , p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e a s k e d t o a d o p t a
d e t a c h e d a n d u n e m o t i o n a l a t t i t u d e a s t h e y w a t c h e d t h e f i l m . I n t h e
s u p p r e s s i o n c o n d i t i o n , p a r ti c i p a n t s w e r e a s k e d t o b e h a v e i n s u c h a w a y
t h a t a p e r s o n w a t c h i n g t h e m w o u l d n o t k n o w t h a t t h e y w e r e f e e l i n g
a n y t h i n g a t a l l. T h e w a t c h c o n d i t i o n s e r v e d a s a c o n t r o l ; i n t h i s c o n d i t i o n ,
p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e s i m p l y a sk e d t o w a t c h t h e f i l m . Pa r t i c i p a n t s w e r e
v i d e o t a p e d , a n d t h e i r p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s p o n s e s w e r e m o n i t o r e d . P a r t i c i-
p a n t s a l s o u s e d e m o t i o n - r a t i n g f o r m s t o d e s c r i b e t h e i r s u b j e c t iv e e x p e r i -
e n c e o f e m o t i o n .
P a r t i c i p a n t s
O n e h u n d r e d t w e n t y u n d e r g ra d u a t e s ( 6 0 m e n a n d 6 0 w o m e n ) p a r t i ci -
p a t e d i n i n d i v i d u a l e x p e r i m e n t a l s e s s i o n s , t o f u l f i l l a r e se a r c h r e q u i r e -
m e n t i n t h e i r p s y c h o l o g y co u r se . 4 O n a v e r a g e , p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e 2 1 y e a r s
o l d (S D = 4 .1 ) . T h e e t h n i c c o m p o s i t i o n o f t h i s s a m p l e w a s m i x e d : 1 %
A f r i c a n A m e r i c a n , 5 5 % A s i a n A m e r i c a n , 3 3 % C a u c a s i a n , 3 % L a t i n o ,
a n d 8 % o t h e r .
S t i m u l u s F i l m s
T h r e e w e l l - v a l i d a t e d s i l e n t f i l m s w e r e u s e d ( G r o s s & L e v e n s o n ,
1 9 9 5 ) . T h e f i r s t fi l m ( 1 r a i n ) w a s a d y n a m i c a b s t r a c t d i sp l a y t h a t e l i c i t s
v e r y l i t t l e e m o t i o n o f a n y k i n d . T h e s e c o n d a n d t h i r d f i l m s s h o w e d
m e d i c a l p r o c e d u r e s . T h e s e w e r e f i r s t u s e d b y P a u l E k m a n o f t h e U n i v e r -
s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a , S a n F r a n c i s c o ( s e e E k m a n , F r i e s e n , & O ' S u l l i v a n ,
1 9 8 8 ) . T h e f i rs t s h o w e d t h e t r e a t m e n t o f b u r n v i c t i m s ( b u r n f i lm ) a n d
w a s 5 5 s l o n g . T h e s e c o n d s h o w e d a c l o s e - u p o f t h e a m p u t a t i o n o f a na r m ( a m p u t a t i o n f i l m ) a n d w a s 6 4 s l o n g . I n p r e t e s t i n g , t h e se t w o f i l m s
e l i c i t e d s e l f - r e p o r t e d d i sg u s t , w i t h l i t t l e r e p o r t o f o t h e r e m o t i o n s .
P r o c e d u r e
O n a r ri v a l, p a r t ic i p a n t s w e r e s e a t e d i n a w e l l - li t 4 × 6 - m r o o m . T h e y
w e r e i n f o r m e d t h a t t h e e x p e r i m e n t w a s c o n c e r n e d w i t h e m o t i o n a n d t h a t
t h e y w o u l d b e v i d e o t a p e d . P h y s i o l o g i c a l s e n s o r s w e r e a t t a c h e d , a n d
p a r t i c ip a n t s u s e d a s e l f - r e p o r t f o r m t o a n s w e r q u e s t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g
d e m o g r a p h i c s a n d c u r r e n t m o o d . P a r t i c i p a n t s t h e n w e r e s h o w n t h r e e
sh o r t f i l m s o n a 1 9 - i n . c o l o r t e l e v i s i o n m o n i t o r a t a d i s t a n c e o f 1 . 7 5
m . A l l i n s t r u c t i o n s w e r e p r e r e c o r d e d a n d p r e s e n t e d v i a t h e t e l e v i s i o n
m o n i t o r .
Be f o r e t h e f i r s t a n d se c o n d f i l m t r i a l s , p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e t o l d t h a t t h e
t e l e v is i o n s c r e e n w o u l d b e b l a n k f o r a b o u t a m i n u t e a n d t h a t t h is t i m e
s h o u l d b e u s e d t o " c l e a r y o u r m i n d o f a ll t h o u g h t s , fe e l i n g s , a n d m e m o -
r i e s . " A f t e r t h i s 1 - m i n b a se l i n e p e r i o d , p a r t i c i p a n t s r e c e i v e d t h e f o l l o w -
i n g i n s t ru c t i o n s : " W e w i l l n o w b e s h o w i n g y o u a s h o r t f il m c l ip . I t i s
i m p o r t a n t t o u s t h a t y o u w a t c h t h e f i l m c l i p c a re f u l l y , b u t i f y o u f i n d
t h e f i l m t o o d i s t r e s s i n g , j u s t s a y ' s t o p . ' " T h e s e i n s t r u c t i o n s w e r e f o l -
l o w e d b y e i t h e r t h e n e u t r a l f i l m ( f i r s t t r i a l ) o r t h e b u r n f i l m ( se c o n d
t r i a l ) . A f t e r e a c h f i l m , t h e r e w a s a l - m i n p o s t f i l m p e r i o d , a t t h e e n d o f
w h i c h p a r t i c i p a n t s c o m p l e t e d a n e m o t i o n - r a t i n g f o r m ( d e s c r i b e d b e -
l o w ) , t o a s s e s s t h e i r e m o t i o n a l r e a c ti o n s d u r i n g t h e f i lm .
T h e t h i r d t r i al b e g a n w i t h t h e s a m e 1 - m i n b a s e l in e p r o c e d u r e . P a r t i c i -
p a n t s t h e n r e c e i v e d o n e o f t h r e e i n s t r u c t i o n s , d e t e r m i n e d b y r a n d o m
a s s i g n m e n t t o o n e o f t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s ( w a t c h , r e a p p r a i sa l , o r s u p p r e s -
s i o n ) . A s s i g n m e n t w a s c o n s t r a i n e d s o t h a t e q u a l n u m b e r s o f m e n a n d
w o m e n w e r e a s s i g n e d t o e a c h c o n d i t i o n . F o r w a t c h p a r t i c i p a n t s ( n =
4 0 ) , t h e f o r e g o i n g i n s t r u c t io n s w e r e r e p e a t e d . R e a p p r a i s a l p a r ti c i p a n t s
( n = 4 0 ) r e c e i v e d t h e fo l l o w i n g i n s t r u c ti o n s :
W e w i l l n o w b e s h o w i n g y o u a s h o r t f i l m cl i p . It i s i m p o r t a n t t o
u s t h a t y o u w a t c h t h e f i l m c l i p c a r e f u l l y , b u t i f y o u f i n d t h e f i lm
t o o d i s t r e s s in g , j u s t s a y " s t o p . " T h i s t i m e , p l e a s e t ry t o a d o p t a
d e t a c h e d a n d u n e m o t i o n a l a t t it u d e a s y o u w a t c h t h e f i lm . I n o t h e r
w o r d s , a s y o u w a t c h t h e f i l m c li p , tr y t o t h i n k a b o u t w h a t y o u a r e
se e i n g o b j e c t i v e l y , i n t e r m s o f t h e t e c h n i c a l a sp e c t s o f t h e e v e n t s
y o u o b se r v e . Wa t c h t h e f i l m c l i p c a r e f u l l y , b u t p l e a se t r y t o t h i n k
a b o u t w h a t y o u a r e s e e i n g i n s u c h a w a y t h a t y o u d o n ' t f e e l a n y t h i n g
at all .
P a r t i c ip a n t s i n t h e s u p p r e s s i o n c o n d i t i o n ( n = 4 0 ) r e c e i v e d t h e f o l lo w i n g
i n s t r u c t i o n s :
W e w i l l n o w b e s h o w i n g y o u a s h o r t f i l m c l i p . I t i s i m p o r t a n t t o
u s t h a t y o u w a t c h t h e f i l m c l i p c a r e f u l l y , b u t i f y o u f i n d t h e f i l m
t o o d i s t r e s s in g , j u s t s a y " s t o p . " T h i s t i m e , i f y o u h a v e a n y f e e l i n g s
a s y o u w a t c h t h e f i l m c l i p , p l e a s e t r y y o u r b e s t n o t t o l e t t h o s e
f e e l i n g s sh o w . I n o t h e r w o r d s , a s y o u w a t c h t h e f i l m c li p , t r y t o
b e h a v e i n s u c h a w a y t h a t a p e r s o n w a t c h i n g y o u w o u l d n o t k n o w
4 A t o t a l o f 1 2 7 s t u d e n t s i n i t i a l ly p a r t i c i p a t e d . O f t h e se , 7 w e r e e x -
c l u d e d f r o m a n a l y s e s b e c a u s e t h e y r e q u e s t e d t o s t o p t h e a m p u t a t i o n f i lm
( 3 i n t h e w a t c h c o n d i t i o n a n d 4 i n t h e s u p p r e s s i o n c o n d i t i o n ) .
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 5/14
2 2 8 G R O S S
y o u w e r e f e e l i n g a n y t h i n g . Wa t c h t h e f i l m c l i p c a r e f u l l y , b u t p l e a se
t r y t o b e h a v e s o t h a t s o m e o n e w a t c h i n g y o u w o u l d n o t k n o w t h a t
y o u a r e f e e l i n g a n y t h i n g a t a l l .
P a r t i ci p a n t s t h e n w a t c h e d t h e a m p u t a t i o n f i lm , w h i c h w a s f o l l o w e d b y
a 1 - m i n p o s t f il m p e r i o d . A f t e r t h e p o s t f il m p e r i o d , p a r t i c i p a n ts c o m -
p l e t e d a n e m o t i o n - r a t i n g f o r m a n d a n s w e r e d s e v e r al a d d i ti o n a l q u e s t i o n s
c o n c e r n i n g t h e i r r e s p o n s e s t o t h e a m p u t a t i o n f il m .
M e a s u r e s
D a t a w e r e c o l l e c t e d i n t h r e e r e s p o n s e d o m a i n s : e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r,
su b j e c t i v e e x p e r i e n c e , a n d p h y s i o l o g y . Be c a u se t h e f i r s t f i l m ( a b s t r a c t
d i s p l a y ) w a s i n c l u d e d s o l e l y to a c c u s t o m p a r t i c ip a n t s t o t h e l a b o r a to r y ,
d a t a f r o m t h i s f i l m w e r e n o t a n a l y z e d . F o r t h e b u r n a n d a m p u t a t i o n
f i lm s , d a t a r e d u c t i o n f o r b e h a v i o r a l a n d p h y s i o l o g i c a l d a t a w a s b a s e d
o n t h e p r e fi l m (1 m i n ) , i n s t r u c ti o n a l ( 1 m i n ) , f i l m ( a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1
m i n ) , a n d p o s t f i lm ( 1 m i n ) p e r i o d s . S e l f - r e p o r t d a t a w e r e a v a i l a b le f o r
b a s e l i n e a n d f i lm p e r i o d s . A s m a n i p u l a t i o n c h e c k s , a f t e r t h e a m p u t a t i o n
f i l m , p a r t i c i p a n t s r a t e d t h r e e s t a t e m e n t s u s i n g a 9 - p o i n t L i k e r t - t y p e sc a l e ,
r a n g i n g f r o m 0 (strongly disagree) to 8 (strongly agree): ( a ) D u r i n g
t h e f i l m , I t r i e d n o t t o f e e l a n y t h i n g a t a l l ; ( b ) d u r i n g t h e f i l m , I f e l te m o t i o n s b u t t r i e d t o h i d e t h e m ; a n d ( c ) d u r i n g t h e f i l m , I r e a c t e d
c o m p l e t e l y s p o n t a n e o u s l y .
Behavior. A r e m o t e c o n t r o l v i d e o c a m e r a p l a c e d b e h i n d d a r k e n e d
g l a s s u n o b t r u s i v e l y r e c o r d e d p a r t i c i p a n t s ' f a c i a l b e h a v i o r a n d u p p e r
b o d y m o v e m e n t . P a r t i c i p a n t s ' b e h a v i o r a l r e s p o n s e s w e r e r a t e d b y f o u r
c o d e r s ( t w o m e n a n d t w o w o m e n ) , w h o w e r e u n a w a r e o f s t i m u l i a n d
e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s . C o d e r s u s e d a m o d i f i e d v e r s i o n o f t h e E m o -
t i o n a l B e h a v i o r C o d i n g S y s t e m ( G r o s s & L e v e n s o n , 1 9 9 3 ) , i n c l u d i n g
( a ) o v e r a l l d i sg u s t , ( b ) e m o t i o n a l i n t e n s i t y , ( c ) o v e r a l l a c t i v i t y ( a n a
p r i o r i c o m p o s i t e d e f i n e d b y f o u r c o d e s : m o u t h m o v e m e n t , f a ci a l m o v e -
m e n t , f ac e t o u c h i n g , a n d b o d y m o v e m e n t ) , a n d ( d ) o b s c u r e s v i s i o n . T h e
f i rs t t h r ee m e a s u r e s w e r e d e s i g n e d t o a s s e s s e m o t i o n - e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r
i n d i s c r e t e ( d i s g u s t ) , d i m e n s i o n a l ( i n t e n s i t y ) , a n d g l o b a l ( a c t i v i t y )
t e r m s . O b s c u r e s v i s i o n w a s a c o n t r o l v a r i a b l e , d e s i g n e d t o a s s e s s
w h e t h e r e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n p a r t i c i p a n t s p r e v e n t e d t h e m s e l v e s f r o ms e e i n g t h e f i lm s b y s h i e l d i n g th e i r g a z e o r l o o k i n g a w a y f r o m t h e s c r e e n .
R e l i a b i li t ie s w e r e g o o d ( m e a n r = . 9 2 ) , r a n g i n g f r o m . 8 3 f o r d i s g u s t
t o . 9 8 f o r o b s c u r e s v i s i o n . A s e x p e c t e d , t h e f o u r c o m p o n e n t s o f t h e
a c t iv i t y c o m p o s i t e w e r e c o r r e l a t e d , a n d t h e c o m p o s i t e h a d a l p h a s r a n g i n g
f r o m . 6 8 t o . 7 5 . F in a l v a l u e s f o r e a c h o f t h e m e a s u r e s w e r e d e t e r m i n e d b y
a v e r a g i n g t h e c o d e r s ' r a t in g s . P a r t i c i p a n t s r e c e i v e d s c o r e s f o r b a s e l i n e ,
i n s t ru c t i o n a l , f il m , a n d p o s t f i l m p e r i o d s ; c h a n g e s c o r e s w e r e c o m p u t e d
b y s u b t r a c ti n g b a s e l i n e s c o r e s f r o m e a c h o f t h e o t h e r s c o re s .
Subjective experience. P a r t i ci p a n t s r a t e d h o w t h e y f e l t b e f o r e e a c h
f i l m ( b a se l i n e r a t i n g ) a n d , a f t e r v i e w i n g e a c h f i l m , h o w t h e y h a d f e l t
d u r i n g t h e f i l m ( f i l m r a t i n g ) . O n e a c h o c c a s i o n , p a r t i c i p a n t s r a t e d t h e i r
d i s g u s t , w h i c h w a s e m b e d d e d i n a s e t o f 1 5 d i s t r a c to r i t e m s ( a m u s e m e n t ,
a n g e r , a r o u sa l , c o n f u s i o n , c o n t e m p t , c o n t e n t m e n t , e m b a r r a s sm e n t , f e a r ,
h a p p i n e s s , i n t e r e s t , p a i n , r e l i e f , s a d n e s s , su r p r i s e , a n d t e n s i o n ) . E a c h
e m o t i o n w a s r a t e d u s i n g a 9 - p o i n t L i k e r t - t y p e s c a l e , r a n g i n g f r o m 0(none) to 8 (mos t in my l i fe ) , a d a p t e d f r o m E k m a n , F r i e s e n , a n d A n c o l i
( 1 9 8 0 ) . T h e p r i m a r y f o c u s w a s o n d i s g u s t e x p e r ie n c e , b u t c h a n g e s c o r e s
w e r e c o m p u t e d f o r a l l 1 6 m e a s u r e s b y s u b t r a c t i n g t h e b a s e l i n e s c o r e
f r o m t h e f i l m sc o r e .
Physiology. F i v e m e a s u r e s w e r e s e l e c t e d f o r u s e i n t h i s s t u d y t o
p r o v i d e a b r o a d i n d e x o f t h e a c t iv i t y o f p h y s i o l o g i c a l s y s t e m s e s p e c i a l ly
r e l e v a n t to e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n d i n g . T h e f i rs t t h r e e m e a s u r e s a s s e s s e d a c t i-
v a t i o n o f t h e s y m p a t h e t i c b r a n c h o f t h e a u t o n o m i c n e r v o u s s y s t e m :
1. Finger pulse amplitude. A U F I p h o t o p l e t h y s m o g r a p h r e c o rd e d
t h e a m p l i t u d e o f b l o o d v o l u m e i n t h e f in g e r u s i n g a p h o t o c e l l ta p e d
t o t h e d i s t a l p h a l a n g e o f t h e s e c o n d f i n g e r o f t h e n o n d o m i n a n t h a n d .
2. Finger temperature. A t h e r m i s t o r a t t a c h e d t o t h e p a l m a r su r f a c e
o f t h e d i s t a l p h a l a n g e o f t h e f o u r t h f i n g e r r e c o r d e d t e m p e r a t u r e i n
d e g r e e s F a h r e n h e it .
3. Skin conductance level. A c o n s t a n t - v o l t a g e d e v i c e w a s u s e d t o
p a s s a s m a l l v o l t a g e b e t w e e n B e c k m a n r e g u l a r e l e c t r o d e s ( u s i n g
a n e l e c t r o ly t e o f s o d i u m c h l o r i d e i n U n i b a s e ) a t t a c h e d to t h e p a l m a r
su r f a c e o f t h e m i d d l e p h a l a n g e s o f t h e f i r s t a n d t h i r d f i n g e r s o f t h e
n o n d o m i n a n t h a n d .
T h e f o u r t h a n d f i f t h m e a su r e s a s se s se d so m a t i c a c t i v i t y a n d h e a r t r a t e ,
r e sp e c t i v e l y :
4. General somatic activity. A n e l e c t r o m e c h a n i c a l t r a n s d u c e r
a t t ac h e d t o t h e p l a t f o r m u n d e r t h e p a r t i c i p a n t ' s c h a i r g e n e r a t e d a n
e l e c t r i c a l s i g n a l p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e a m o u n t o f m o v e m e n t i n a n y
d i r e c t i o n .
5. Cardiac interbeat interval. B e c k m a n m i n i a t u r e e l e c t r o d e s w i t h
R e d u x p a s t e w e r e p l a c e d i n a b i p o l a r c o n f i g u r a t i o n o n o p p o s i t e
s i d e s o f t h e p a r t i c i p a n t ' s c h e s t . T h e i n t e r b e a t i n t e rv a l w a s c a l c u l a t e d
a s t h e i n t e rv a l ( i n m i l l i s e c o n d s ) b e t w e e n s u c c e s s i v e R - w a v e s .
D u r i n g t h e e x p e r im e n t a l s e s s i o n s , la b o r a t o r y s o f t w a r e c o m p u t e d s e c -
o n d - b y - s e c o n d a v e r a g e s f o r e a c h o f t h e f i ve p h y s i o l o g i c a l m e a s u r e st h r o u g h o u t e a c h b a se l i n e , i n s t r u c t i o n a l , f i l m , a n d p o s t f i l m p e r i o d . T h e se
s e c o n d - b y - s e c o n d p h y s io l o g i c a l v a l u es l a t e r w e r e u s e d t o c o m p u t e
s c o r e s f o r e a c h p a r t i c ip a n t r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e a v e r a g e s o f t h e p h y s i o l o g i c a l
v a r i a b l e s f o r t h e b a se l i n e , i n s t r u c t i o n a l , f i l m , a n d p o s t f i l m p e r i o d s .
C h a n g e s c o r e s f o r th e f iv e m e a s u r e s w e r e c o m p u t e d b y s u b t r a ct i n g b a s e -
l i n e s c o r e s f r o m i n s t r u c t i o n a l , f i l m , a n d p o s t f i l m p e r i o d s .
R e s u l t s
R a n d o m A s s i g n m e n t a n d M a n i p u l a ti o n C h e c ks
A l l p a r t i c i p a n t s v i e w e d t h e i n i t ia l d i s g u s t - e l i c i t i n g f i lm ( t h e
b u r n f i l m ) u n d e r t h e s a m e i n s t r u c t i o n s t o s i m p l y w a t c h t h e fi l m .
T h i s f i l m t h e r e f o r e p r o v i d e d a n o p p o r t u n i t y t o e v a l u a t e t h e e f -
f e c t iv e n e s s o f o u r r a n d o m a s s i g n m e n t o f p a r t ic i p a n t s t o e x p e r i -
m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s . O v e r a l l m u l t i v a r i a te a n a l y s e s o f v a r i a n c e
( M A N O V A s ) f o r th e b e h a v i o r a l, s u b j ec t iv e , a n d p h y s i o l o g i ca l
d o m a i n s f a i l e d to r e v e a l a n y d i f f e r e n c e s a m o n g p a r t i c i p a n t s
a s s i g n e d t o th e t h r e e i n s t r u c t i o n a l g r o u p s d u r i n g t h i s f i lm , s u g -
g e s t i n g t h a t o u r r a n d o m a s s i g n m e n t h a d b e e n s u c c e s s fu l . 5
A s e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n p a r t i c i p a n t s r e c e i v e d t h e i r i n s t r u c t i o n s ,
w a s t h e r e e v i d e n c e o f p r e p a r a t o r y a c t iv i t y th a t m i g h t d i s t i n g u i s h
t h e m f r o m w a t c h p a r t i c ip a n t s ? I n t h e b e h a v i o r al d o m a i n , r e a p -
p r a i s a l p a r t i c i p a n t s s h o w e d g r e a t e r i n c r e a s e s i n e m o t i o n a l i n t e n -
s i t y t h a n w a t c h p a r t i c i p a n t s ( e . g . , i n t e r e s t , c o n c e n t r a t i o n ) , a n d
s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i c i p a n t s s h o w e d g r e a t e r in c r e a s e s i n a c ti v i ty
t h a n w a t c h p a r t i c i p a n t s ( s e e T a b l e 1 ) .6 A s c o m p a r e d w i t h w a t c h
p a r t i c i p a n t s , b o t h re a p p r a i s a l a n d s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i c i p a n t ss h o w e d g r e a t e r d e c r e a s e s i n fi n g e r p u l s e a m p l i t u d e a n d f i n g e r
t e m p e r a t u r e a n d g r e a t e r i n c r e a s e s i n sk i n c o n d u c t a n c e a n d s o -
m a t i c a c t i v it y ( s e e T a b l e 1 ) . I n g e n e r a l , p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e -
s p o n d i n g w a s s o m e w h a t g r e a te r in t h e s u p p r e s s i o n c o n d i t i o n
s I n e a c h a n a l y s i s , p a r t i c i p a n t s e x w a s i n i t i a l ly i n c l u d e d a s a f a c to r .
B e c a u s e s e x d i d n o t i n t e r a c t w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n a l c o n d i t i o n , s e x w a s
d r o p p e d f r o m t h e f i n al a n a l y s e s.
6 A s m i g h t b e e x p e c t e d , d u r i n g t h e p r e f i l m p e r i o d , t h e r e w e r e n o
g r o u p d i f f e r e n c e s in r a t i n g s o f d i s g u s t - e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r o r o b s c u r i n g
v i s i o n .
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 6/14
T W O FO R M S O F E M O T I O N R E G U L A T I O N
T a b l e 1
Mean Change in Expressive Behavior and Physio log ica l Responding
During the Instruct ional Period
Instructions
Reappraise Watch Supp ress
Measure M SD M SD M SD
BehavioralEm otional intensity 0.90, 1.01 0.35h 0.86 0 . 5 8 a . b 0.87Overal l ac t ivi ty -0 .06 , 0.81 -0 .2 4, 0.76 0.30b 0.60
PhysiologicalFin ger pulse amplitude --2.26a 3.19 --0.13b 2.07 --4.13c 2.78Fin ger temperature --0.07, 0.52 0.18b 0.62 --0.13a 0.45Skin conductance 0.06a 0.62 -0.2 0b 0.51 0.36c 0.55Som atic activity 0.06, 0.14 -0.0 1b 0.13 0.12a 0.23Interbeat interval -25 .90 , 39.62 - 10.99, 3 6 .5 4 -47.73b 52.09
Note. M ea ns n a g iven row w ith different subscripts differ significantly at p < .05 , two-tailed.
2 2 9
t ha n i n t he r e a pp r a i s a l c ond i t i on , a nd on l y s upp r e s s i on pa r t i c i -pa n t s s how e d g r e a t e r i nc r e a s e s i n he a r t r a t e t ha n w a t c h pa r t i c i -
p a n t s . A l t h o u g h t h e b e h a v i o r a l s i g n s o f p r e p a r a t i o n d i f f e r e d
s o m e w h a t f o r t h e t w o g r o u p s , t h e o v e r a ll s i m i l a r it y i n r e s p o n s e s
s ugge s t s t ha t t he s e p r e pa r a t o r y e f f e c t s m a y be qu i t e ge ne r a l .
W h e n p a r t i c ip a n t s i n th e t w o e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n g r o u p s h e a r d
t h a t t h e y s o o n w o u l d b e c a l l e d o n t o m a n a g e t h e i r em o t i o n s , t h e y
a p p e a r e d t o s t e e l t h e m s e l v e s , a n d t h e i r h e i g h t e n e d a u t o n o m i c
a c t i va t i on ( r e la t i ve to t he w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s ) s ugge s t s bo t h t he i r
c onc e r n a bou t t he a s s i gne d t a s k a nd t he e f f o r t s t he y m a de t o
p r e p a r e t h e m s e l v es .
A f t e r the a m p u t a t i on f i l m , t h r e e que s t i ons w e r e a dm i n i s t e r e d
t o a s s e s s c o m p l i a n c e w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n s . C o m p a r e d w i t h t h e
w a t c h p a r t i c ip a n t s , b o t h s u p p r e s s i o n p a r ti c i p a n t s, t ( 7 8 ) = 4 . 7 ,
p < . 001 , a nd r e a pp r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s , t ( 7 8 ) = 3 . 2 , p < . 01 ,
r e p o r t e d r e a c t i n g l e s s s p o n t a n e o u s l y d u r i n g t h e a m p u t a t i o n f il m ,
c o n s i s te n t w i t h t h e i r h a v i n g b e e n a s k e d t o r e g u l a t e t h e i r e m o -
t io n s . A s e x p e c t e d , r e a p p r a i s a l p a r t ic i p a n t s r e p o r t e d t r y i n g n o t
t o f e e l t he e m o t i on t o a g r e a t e r de g r e e t ha n w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s ,
t ( 7 8 ) = 8 . 8 , p < . 001 , a nd s upp r e s s i o n pa r t i c i pa n t s , t ( 7 8 ) =
2 . 2 , p < . 05 . A l s o a s e xpe c t e d , s upp r e s s i on pa r t i c i pa n t s r e po r t e d
f e e l i ng bu t h i d i ng e m o t i ons t o a g r e a t e r de g r e e t ha n w a t c h pa r t i -
c i pa n t s , t ( 7 8 ) = 7 . 3 , p < . 001 , a nd r e a pp r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s
t ( 77 . 7 ) = 2 . 0 , p < . 05 .
E m o t i o n R e g u l a t i o n a n d E x p r e s s i v e B e h a v i o r
H y p o t h e s i s 1 p r e d i c t e d t h a t e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n p a r t i c ip a n t s
w o u l d s h o w l e s s ex p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r d u r i n g f i lm a n d p o s t f il m
pe r i ods t ha n w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s . I nde e d , a s p r e s e n t e d i n T a b l e
2 , t h i s i s p r e c i s e l y w ha t w a s f ound . D ur i ng t he f i l m pe r i od ,
r e a pp r a i s a l a nd s upp r e s s i on pa r t i c i pa n t s s how e d l e s s e r i nc r e a s e s
i n d i s gus t , e m o t i o na l i n t e ns i ty , a nd a c t i v i t y t ha n w a t c h pa r t i c i -
pa n t s . Fo r d i s gus t a nd i n t e ns it y , t h i s re duc t i on w a s s o m e w ha t
m o r e p r o n o u n c e d f o r s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i c ip a n t s th a n f o r r e a p -
p r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s . D u r i ng t he pos t f i l m pe r i od , r e a pp r a i s a l a nd
s upp r e s s i on pa r t i c i pa n t s s how e d l e s s e r inc r e a s e s i n d i s gus t t ha n
w a t c h p a r t i ci p a n t s , a n d s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i ci p a n t s s h o w e d l e s s er
i nc r e a s e s i n i n t e ns i t y t ha n r e a p p r a i s a l o r w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s .
T h e r e w e r e n o d i f f e re n c e s a m o n g g r o u p s i n t h e d e g r e e t o w h i c hpa r t i c i pa n t s obs c u r e d t he i r v i s i on , i nd i c a t i ng t ha t e m o t i on r e gu -
l a t i on pa r t i c i pa n t s d i d no t s i m p l y c ove r t he i r e ye s t o l e s s e n t he
e m o t i o n a l i m p a c t o f t h e f i lm .
E m o t i o n R e g u l a t i o n a n d S u b j e c t i v e E x p e r i e n c e
E xt e ns i ve p r e t e s t i ng ha d s how n t ha t t he a m pu t a t i on f i l m ge n -
e r a l l y e l i c i t s h i gh l e ve l s o f d i s gus t e xpe r i e nc e . H ypo t he s i s 2
s ugge s t e d t ha t r e a pp r a i s a l w ou l d l e s s e n t he s ub j e c t i ve i m pa c t
o f t h i s f i lm b u t t h a t s u p p r e s s io n w o u l d n o t . A s p r e s e n t e d i n
F i gu r e 2 , t h i s w a s i nde e d t he c a s e . R e a pp r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s ha d
l e s s e r i nc r e a s e s i n d i s gus t e xpe r i e nc e w h i l e w a t c h i ng t he f i l m
t ha n w a t c h pa r t i c ipa n t s , t ( 7 7 ) = 2 . 2 , p < . 05 , w he r e a s s upp r e s -
s i on pa r t i c i pa n t s d i d no t, t ( 78 ) = 0 . 8 , ns .W a s t h i s a l t e r a t i on i n s ub j e c t i ve e xpe r i e nc e s pe c i f i c t o t he
t a r ge t e m o t i on o f d i s gus t ? O r w a s t he r e a ge ne r a l du l l i ng o f
s u b j e c ti v e e x p e r ie n c e ? T h e o t h e r e m o t i o n t e r m s w e r e i n c l u d e d
a s d i s t r a c t o r s t o m a ke t he ke y c om pa r i s on l e s s obv i ous t o pa r t i -
c i pa n t s , bu t t he y pe r m i t t e d a n e xa m i na t i on o f w he t he r t h i s
r e duc t i on i n d i s gus t w a s pa r t o f a l a r ge r pa t te r n o f a l t e r e d s ub j e c -
t i ve e xpe r i e nc e . T o t e s t th i s pos s i b i l i t y , I c ond uc t e d a n ove r -
a l l t h r e e - l e ve l c ond i t i on ( w a t c h , s u pp r e s s , o r r e a pp r a i s e )
M A N O V A f o r t h e 1 5 o t h e r e m o t i o n e x p e r i e n c e r a t i n g s . T h e
c ond i t i on e f f e c t w a s no t s i gn i f ic a n t , F ( 30 , 20 2 ) = 1 .1 , s ug -
ge s t i ng t ha t e m o t i on r e gu l a t i on d i d no t ha ve a n ove r a l l e f f e c t
on e xpe r i e nc e .
E m o t i o n R e g u l a t i o n a n d P h y s i o l o g y
H y p o t h e s i s 3 p r e d i c t e d t h a t r e a p p r a i s a l p a r t i c i p a n t s w o u l d
s how l e s s s ym pa t he t i c , s om a t i c , a nd he a r t r a t e r e s pond i ng t ha n
t he w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s du r i ng t he f i l m a nd pos t f i l m pe r i ods . B y
c o n t r a st , s u p p r e s s i o n p a r t i ci p a n t s w e r e h y p o t h e s i z e d t o s h o w
gr e a t e r s ym pa t he t i c r e s pond i ng du r i ng t he f i l m a nd pos t f i l m
pe r i ods t ha n w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s bu t l e s s s om a t i c a nd he a r t r a t e
r e s pond i ng . A s p r e s e n t e d i n T a b l e 3 , a na l y s e s w e r e c onduc t e d
u s i n g p e r i o d a v e r a g es ; c o n t i n u o u s p h y s i o l o g i c a l p l o t s a l s o a r e
p r e s e n t e d f o r t he t h r e e m e a s u r e s o f s ym pa t he t i c a c t i va t i on , t o
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 7/14
23 0 GROSS
Table 2
Mean Change in Expressive Behavior During the Film and Postfilm Periods
Instructions
Reappraise Watch Suppress
Behavioral measure M SD M SD M SD
Target variablesOverall disgustFilm 0.82, 1.11 2.30b 2.10 0.35c 1.00Postfilm 0.35,, 0.92 0.85b 1.27 0.13, 0.40
Emotional intensityFilm 1.03, 1.05 2.27b 1.69 0.45c 0.90Postfilm 0.80a 1.07 1.00, 1.01 0.30b 0.52
Overall activityFilm -0.12a 0.66 0.24b 0.96 -0.12, 0.56Postfilm -0.01, 0.68 0.11 a 0.77 -0.10a 0.69
Control variableObscures vision
Film 0.43, 1.58 0.53a 1.52 0.53a 3.16Postfilm 0.00, 0.00 0.00a 0.00 0.00, 0.00
Note. Means n a given row with different subscripts differ at p < .05, two-tailed.
elucidate the dynamic effects of emotion regulation (see Figures
3 -5 ) .
Did the two emotion regulat ion conditions diverge f rom the
control cond ition? As predicted, dur ing the film period, suppres-
sion participants showed greater sympathetic activation than
watch participants, and this effect was evident for all three
measures of sympathetic responding. Compared with both
watch and reappraisal participants, suppression participants
~ 3
~ 2
Reappraise Watch Suppress
Figure 2. Meanchange in self-reported disgust experience during theamputation film for the three instructional groups. Error bars indicate
standard error of the mean.
showed greater decreases in finger pulse amplitude and greater
decreases in finger temperature (both indicative of greater vaso-
constriction and hence greater sympathetic activation), as well
as greater increases in skin conductance (another sign of in-
creased sympathetic activation). This effect continued into the
postfilm period in a somewhat attenuated form. Here, suppres-
sion participants had greater decreases in finger pulse amplitude
and finger temperature than the other two groups. Unexpectedly,
however, suppression participants did not show less somatic or
heart rate responding than watch participants during either film
or postfilm periods. The hypothesis that reappraisal participants
would show fewer physiological signs of emotion than watch
participants also was not confirmed. Reappraisal participants
showed physiological responses that were indistinguishable
from watch participants during film and postfilm periods.
Discussion
These findings suggest a number of differences between the
antecedent -focused and response-focused forms of emotion reg-
ulation studied here. In the following sections, I review the
present results and discuss their implications for psychological
and physical health.
What Happens When We Regulate Our Emotions?
Despite striking commonalties in the effects of preparing to
regulate emotions, participants in the two emotion regulation
conditions showed quite different responses during the actual
period of emotion regulation. Reappraisal led to decreases in
both behavioral and subjective signs of emotion, with no hint of
elevations in physiological responding. Thus, it was a relatively
effective means of inhibi ting emotion. Suppression, by contrast,
although effective at diminishing expressive behavior, had no
impact on subjective experience and led to increases in multiple
indices of sympathetic nervous system activation.
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 8/14
T W O FO R M S O F E M O T I O N R E G U L A T I O N
T a b l e 3
M ean C hange i n P hys io log i ca l R espond ing D ur ing t he F i lm and P os t f i lm P er iods
Instructions
Reappraise Watch Supp ress
Physiological measure M SD M SD M SD
Sympathetic activationFinger pulse ampli tude
Fi lm -2.70 a 4.40 -3.25 a 4.77 --6.08b 4.71Postfi lm -0.60 a 3.28 -0.01 a 3.82 -2.17b 3.82
Finger temperatureFi lm -0.49 a 0.83 -0.19 a 1.00 -1.13 b 0.79Postfilm -0. 54 a 1.10 -0.4 5a 1.35 - 1.47b 1.31
Skin condu ctanceFilm 0.13a 0.87 0.34a 1.28 0.79b 0.89Postfilm -0.10~ 0.75 0.10a 0.90 0.21 ~ 0.82
Activity and heart rateSomatic activity
Fi lm -0.06 a 0.11 -0.05~ 0.18 -0.0 8a 0.25Postfilm 0.03~ 0.11 0.05~ 0.25 -0.02~ 0.22
Interbeat intervalFilm 38.27a 44.87 33.81~ 51.83 32 .6L 70.38Pos tfilm 9.32a 26.4 0 12.07~b 29.43 30.68b 56.73
N ote . M ea ns in a given row with different subscripts differ from on e another at p < .05 . A ll tests aretwo-tailed except skin conductance, which was predicted on the basis of results of three prior studies(Gross & Levenson 1993, 1997) .
2 3 1
E f f ec t s o f r eappra i sa l . O n t h e b a s i s o f t h e p r o c e s s m o d e l
o f e m o t i o n d e p i c t e d i n F i g u r e 1 , I h y p o t h e s i z e d th a t r e e v a lu a t i n g
t h e s i g n i f ic a n c e o f a p o t e n t i a l ly e m o t i o n - e l ic i t in g f i lm w o u l d
l e a d t o f e w e r e xpe r i e n t i a l , be ha v i o r a l , a nd phys i o l og i c a l s i gns
o f e m o t i o n t h a n s i m p l y w a t c h i n g t h e f i l m . I n d e e d , c o m p a r e d
w i t h w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s , r e a pp r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s r e po r t e d l e s s
d i s g u s t e x p e r i e n c e a n d s h o w e d f e w e r b e h a v i o r a l s i g n s o f d i s -
gus t , s ugg e s t i ng t he e f f ic a c y o f t h i s e m o t i on r e gu l a t o r y s t r a t e gy ,
e ve n i n t he c on t e x t o f a po t e n t ne ga t i ve e m o t i on . T h i s po i n t i s
r e i n f o r c e d b y t h e o b s e r v a t i o n th a t a l t h o u g h 7 w a t c h a n d s u p p r e s -
s i o n c o n d i t i o n p a r t i c ip a n t s a s k e d f o r t h e f i l m t o b e s t o p p e d ( a n d
t h u s w e r e r e p l a c e d ; s e e f o o t n o te 4 ) , n o n e o f t h e r ea p p r a i s a l
pa r t i c i pa n t s d i d s o , X 2( 1 , N = 120 ) = 3 . 41 , p = . 07 ( one -
t a i l e d ) .
Su r p r i s i ng l y , how e ve r , r e a pp r a i s a l a nd w a t c h pa r t i c i pa n t s ha d
c o m p a r a b l e p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s p o n s e s t o t h e f i l m . A n i n s p e c t io n
o f t h e c o n t i n u o u s p l o t s o f p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s p o n d i n g ( s e e F i g u r e s
3 - 5 ) r e v e a ls th a t r e a p p r a i sa l p a r t i c ip a n t s m a y h a v e s h o w n
s l i gh t l y l e s s phys i o l o g i c a l a c ti va t i on , bu t t he s e d i f f e r e nc e s w e r e
n o t s i g n if i ca n t . W h y d i d n ' t r e a p p r a i s a l d e c r e a s e p h y s i o l o g i c a l
r e s pon d i ng ? N u l l f i nd i ngs a r e s u s c e p t i b l e t o d i ve r ge n t e xp l a n a -t i o n s, b u t o n e p o s s i b i l i t y i s t h a t r e a p p r a i sa l s i m p l y d o e s n o t
a f f e ct t h e p h y s i o l o g i c a l c o m p o n e n t o f a n e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n s e
( S t e p t o e & V o g e l e, 1 9 8 6 ) . G i v e n t h e s m a l l c o r r e l a ti o n s a m o n g
t h e c o m p o n e n t s o f a n e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n s e ( e . g . , L a n g , R i c e , &
S t e r nba c h , 197 2 ) , a n i n t e r ve n t i on s uc h a s r e a pp r a i s a l m i g h t
s e l e ct i v e ly ta r g e t j u s t t w o o f t h e c o m p o n e n t s o f t h e r e s p o n s e
( b e h a v i o r a n d e x p e r i e n c e ) a n d n o t a t h i r d ( p e r i p h e r a l p h y s i o l -
o g y ) . A l t e rn a t iv e l y , i t m a y b e t h a t t h e p o t e n c y o f t h e a m p u t a t io n
f i l m ga ve r e a pp r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s l i t tl e c ha nc e t o s hu t dow n i t s
p o w e r f u l ( p o s s i b l y s u b c o r t i c a l l y m e d i a t e d ) a u t o n o m i c e f f e ct s
( s e e L e D o u x , 1 9 8 9 ) . P e r h a p s w i t h a m i l d e r f il m , a m o r e c o g n i -
t iv e l y e la b o r a t e d e m o t i o n , a l o n g e r e m o t i o n e p i s o d e , o r m o r e
de t a i l e d r e a pp r a i s a l i n s t r uc t i ons , r e a pp r a i s a l pa r t i c i pa n t s w ou l d
h a v e s h o w n l e s s er p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s p o n d i n g .
E f f ec t s o f suppres s ion . C o m p a r e d w i t h w a t c h p a r t i c i p a n t s ,
t h o s e i n t h e s u p p r e s s io n c o n d i t i o n s h o w e d t h e e x p e c t e d d e c r e a s e
i n e xp r e s s i ve be ha v i o r . M or e ove r , t he y e xp e r i e nc e d ju s t a s m uc h
d i s g u s t a n d s h o w e d m o r e s y m p a t h e t i c a c t i v a t i o n o n a l l t h r e e
m e a s u r e s ( f i nge r pu l s e a m p l i t ude , f i nge r t e m pe r a t u r e , a nd s k i nc onduc t a nc e l e ve l ) . T h i s pa t t e r n o f f i nd i ngs i s c ons i s t e n t w i t h
p r e v i o u s s t u d i es u s i n g t h is p a r a d i g m ( G r o s s & L e v e n s o n , 1 99 3 ,
1 9 9 7 ) a n d s u g g e s t s t h a t r e s p o n s e - f o c u s e d e m o t i o n r e g u l a t i o n
c o m e s a t t h e c o s t o f h e i g h t e n e d p h y s i o l o g i c a l r e s p o n d i n g , p o s s i -
b l y due t o t he pa r a l l e l a c t i va ti on o f s ubc o r t i c a l e m o t i on c e n t e r s
a l ongs i de h i ghe r o r de r i nh i b i t o r y s t r uc t u r e s .
I n p r e v i o u s s tu d i e s ( G r o s s & L e v e n s o n , 1 9 9 3 ) , p a r t i ci p a n t s
w h o s u p p r e s s e d d i s g u s t s h o w e d d e c r e a s e d s o m a t i c a c t i v it y an d
ha d c onc om i t a n t de c r e a s e s i n he a r t r a t e . I n t he p r e s e n t s t udy ,
how e ve r , e ve n t hough s upp r e s s i on pa r t i c i pa n t s w e r e r a t e d a s
s h o w i n g l e s s e x p r e ss i v e b e h a v i o r t h a n w a t c h p a r t ic i p a n t s , th e y
s how e d ne i t he r l e s s s om a t i c a c t i v i t y no r l ow e r he a r t ra t e s . W hy
m i g h t t h i s f e a t u r e o f t h e s u p p r e s s i o n r e s p o n s e f o u n d i n t w op r e v i o u s s t u d i e s o f d i s g u s t b e a b s e n t i n t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y ? A n
e x a m i n a t i o n o f a c t i v it y l ev e l m e a n s a c r o s s s t u d ie s p r o v i d e s o n e
p o s s i b l e e x p l a n a ti o n . W h e r e a s p a r t i c ip a n t s i n t h e w a t c h c o n d i -
t i o n in t h e t w o p r i o r s tu d i e s ( G r o s s & L e v e n s o n , 1 9 9 3 ) s h o w e d
a n a ve r a g e i nc r e a s e o f 0 . 11 un i t s o f s om a t i c a c ti v i ty , pa r t i c i pa n t s
i n t he w a t c h c ond i t i on i n t he p r e s e n t s t udy s how e d a de c r e a s e
f r o m b a s e l in e o f - 0 . 0 5 u n i ts ( a s c o m p a r e d w i t h - 0 . 0 8 i n t h e
s upp r e s s i on c on d i t i on ) . T h i s m a ke s i t li ke l y t ha t a f loo r e f f e c t
w a s ope r a t i ve : Supp r e s s i on c ou l d no t de c r e a s e s om a t i c a c t i v i t y
f u r t he r be c a us e t he s om a t i c a c t i v i t y l e ve l s o f t he pa r t i c i pa n t s i n
t h e w a t c h c o n d i t i o n a l r e a d y w e r e w e l l b e l o w t h e ir b a s e l in e l e v -
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 9/14
232 GROSS
Figure 3. Mean change in finger pulse amplitude during the amputation trial for the three instructional
groups. Note that the ordinate's scale is such that increased sympathetic activation is upward.
els. This suggests that the specific effects of suppression on
somatic activity, and hence heart rate, wil l depend on the preci se
pattern of somatic activity generated by the target emotion in a
given setting (see Gross & Levenson, 1997).
Implications for Psychological Health
The present research suggests that for negative emotions such
as disgust, antecedent-focused and response-focused emotion
regulation may have quite different consequences. Reappraisal
led to decreased feelings of disgust, even when this strategy
was foisted on participants in the context of a potent emotion-
eliciting film, where it might be thought there would be little
room for such cogni tive strategies. This suggests that reappraisal
might have much to recommend it as an effective route to experi-
encing less negative emotion, and it may well be reappraisaland other antecedent-focused emotion regulatory strategies that
theorists have in mind when espousing the positive consequences
of emotion regulation for psychological health (Thayer, New-
man, & McClain, 1994). By contrast, inhi biting the outward
expression of negative emotion fails to provide any relief from
the subjective experience of negative emotion.
These findings indicate that reappraisal may be prefe rable to
suppression as a route to psychological well-being. But anteced-
ent-focused emotion regulation is not itself without costs. For
example, inflexible or unrealistic reappraisals might lead one
to deny important features of one' s environment, such as haz-
ards at work or abusive tendencies in a partner. In such cases,
the short-term benefits of relief from negative emotion would
almost certainly be outweighed by the long- term costs of stifling
the adaptive behavioral tendencies, such as flight, associated
with negative emotions. In addition, there may be more general
costs of any form of emotion regulation that diminishes emo-
tion-expressive behavior. Theorists since Darwin (187 2/1 965)
have argued that we rely on the emotional expressions of our
social partners to give us information about their needs and
preferences. For example, if we inadvertently anger someone,
their angry expression signals what has happened, and we are
able to apologize. But if the person we have angered regulates
emotion in a way that diminishes expressive behavior, we may
be oblivious to the problem and do nothing to change our ac-
tions. In this case, the person who is regulating is likely to
continue to have emotional responses, perhaps at even greater
intensi ty levels.
If, as I have argued, different forms of emotion regulation
have different consequences, no one strategy is likely to prove
unifor mly superior to all others across all contexts. Thus, what
is crucial is knowing how and when to use various emotion
regulatory strategies (Tavris, 1984). Such knowledge may be
communica ted in a variety of ways (Gross & Mufioz, 1995),
and a more complete understanding of the costs and benefits of
diverse regulatory processes promises to inform clinical inter-
ventions designed to promote healthy forms of emotion regula-
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 10/14
TWO FORMS OF EMOTION REGULATION 233
- 3 . 5 -
~- 2 . 5 -
&
~ - - 1 . 5 -
IN
q~
w - 0 . 5 -
iBa,,eUnell Ilnetructtoneli [ ~
m i 0 mi j O i
O J O g
e 00
mI
i P o n ~ n , , , , , _ h
- . - . E espp r s l m
• I imq
0 . 62 1 4 ,1 6 1 8 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 4 1
r i m e ( - , )
Figure 4. Meanchange in finger emperature during the amputation trial for the three instructional groups.
Note that the ordinate's scale is such that increased sympathetic activation is upward.
tion that are well matched to situational demands. These inter-
ventions may target individuals known to be at elevated risk for
depression or anxiety, or those whose professions (e.g., airline
personnel and paramedics) require them to regularly manage
intense emotions such as anger and disgust (Hochschild, 1983;
A. C. Smith & Kleinman , 1989; Sutton, 1991 ).
Impl icat ions for Physical Heal th
The present results are consistent with the view that emotion
regulation, particularly emotional suppression, may play a role
in physical health. Although the long-term health consequences
of acute emotional suppression were not assessed in this study,
the present results do show that each time emotion is suppressed
rather than expressed, sympathetic tone will be elevated. Any
one response of increased intensity would be unlikely to have
deleterious consequences, but it is conceivable that if such re-
sponses were repeated many times there might be adverse health
consequences (Krant z & Manuck, 1984). Extrapolating further,
suppression might increase not onl y the intensity of physiologi-
cal responses but also their frequency. As noted above, one
importan t functio n of emotions is to signal to others o ne' s
wishes and needs. I f these signals are systematically concealed,
others may not know one's wishes. This would make it less
likely that one 's interactants would be accommodating and more
likely that one would have intense and frequent negative-emo-
tion-laden interactions.
But how might these intense, frequent emotional responses
affect physical health? One link between emotional suppression
and physical health is suggested by the literature on cardiovascu-
lar disease. Here, emotional suppression has been shown to
be associated with essential hypertension and coronary artery
disease (Friedman & Booth-Kewley, 1987; Manuck & Krantz,
1986; Roter & Ewart, 1992; Steptoe, 1993). One possible mech-
anism underly ing this association may be sustained physiologi-
cal reactivity that is in excess of current metabolic demands
(Steptoe, 1981; Williams, 1986). The evidence from the present
study is consisten t with this possibility, showing that the acute
effects of emotional suppression include increased sympathetic
activation of the cardiovascular system despite low levels of
somatic activity. It remains to be determined, of course, whether
repeated episodes of this sort do in fact affect the integrity of
the cardiovascular system in vulnerable individuals.A second potential link between emotional suppression and
health is suggested by the stress tradition (Ursin & Olff, 1993)
and, more particularly, by research on stress and immune func-
tioning (Kiecolt-Gla ser & Glaser, 1991). Here, the suggestion
is that the stress response (which involves both autonomic and
neuroendocrine compon ents) may lead to the selective inhibit ion
of certain aspects of the immune response (Maier, Watldns, &
Fleshner, 1994; Sapolsky, 1994). Clearly, the links between vari-
ous components of the stress response and immune functioning
are extremely complex (Dienstbier, 1989; O'Leary, 1990).
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 11/14
234 GROSS
2 . 5 "
IB &- eUnq l [In-,la.ucUonq ~ Ipo,,t.t.ml,
i : I - " ' * " I: "..,.
; - . , / . - - - . t
i J a ,i 55 " , ' , ~4 , , , ~ , ;^ r~ " e " . ,~_ 1 A . ._• / I f I1"~11 m d I " L | I ~ , IP I I ~ l , i I~ '~ I" L • ~1~
/ : :," A.I/%;
1 21 41 Ol 81 101 121 1,1.1 161 181 201 221 2,1.1
T i m e ( , . )
Figure 5. Meanchange in skin conductanceduring the amputation trial for the three instructional groups.
Note that the ordinate's scale is such that increased sympathetic activation is upward.
Nonetheless, the finding that inhibiti ng moderate levels of emo-
tional expressive behavior leads to increased sympathetic activa-
tion of the cardiovascular system raises the possibility that sup-
press ion may activate some elements of the classic stress re-
sponse, which in turn may influence the nature and course of
immune responding (Esterling, Antoni, Kumar, & Schnei-
derman, 1990; Felten & Felten, 1994; Pennebaker, Kiecolt-Gla-
ser, & Glaser, 1988).
Direc t ions fo r Future Research
One direction for future research concerns the generalizability
of the present findings. For example, might the consequences
of emotion regulation vary according to whether the emotion
being regulated is anger, disgust, sadness, or some other emo-
tion? The lack of consensus as to whether each emotion calls
forth emotion-specific physiological (e.g., Cacioppo, Klein,Berntson, & Hatfield, 1993; Levenson, 1992; Zajonc & Mcln-
tosh, 1992) and behavioral (e.g., Ekman, 1994; Izard, 1994;
Russell, 1994) response tendencies makes this question difficult
to answer, bu t different emotions conceivably might present dif-
ferent emotion regulatory challenges. Note, however, that in the
context of emotional suppression, results to date suggest that
commonalities in the effects of suppression outweigh differ-
ences (Gross & Levenson, 1997). A second form of generaliz-
ability concerns participant characteristics. Over ha lf of the par-
ticipants in the present study were Asian American, and all were
college-age. Given known differences in emotional experience,
expression, and control across ethnic groups (e.g., Gross &
John, 1998) and age groups (e.g., Gross et al., 1997), it will
be important to assess whether these findings generalize to other
research participants. A third aspect of generalizability concerns
relations with other forms of emotion regulation, such as distrac-
tion or exaggeration (see Ekman & Friesen, 1969). It also will
be impor tant to test limits of generalizability by examining other
regulatory processes, such as negative mood regulation (Catan-
zaro & Mearns, 1990; Nolen-Hoeksema, Parker, & Larson, 1994;
Thayer et al., 1994) , thought suppression (Roemer & Borkovec,
1994; Wegner, 1994), and even self-es teem regulation (Steele,
Spencer, & Lynch, 1993). By tracing points of divergence and
convergence across different emotions, participant groups, and
regulatory processes, a more differentiated view of emotion
regulation will emerge--one that avoids premature synthesis
but reveals interconnecti ons among apparently diverse processes
(e.g., Westen, 1994).
Future work also must consider emotion regulation in all its
complexity outside the confines of the laboratory. Interview data
(Gross et al., 1998; Tice & Baumeister, 1993) suggest that
individuals use a rich variety of emotion regulation strategies
and that these may vary rapidly over the course o f an interaction.
Some of these would have been difficult to observe in a labora-
tory paradigm such as the one used here. Examples include
situation selection and situation modification (primary control
strategies in which a person modifies a bothersome environment;
see Rothbaum, Weisz, & Snyder, 1982) , as well as strategies
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 12/14
T W O F O R M S O F E M O T I O N R E G U L A T IO N 2 3 5
t h a t o c c u r o u t s i d e c o n s c i o u s a w a r e n e s s , s u c h a s r e p r e s s i o n
( B r o w n e t a l ., 1 9 9 6 ; W e i n b e r g e r , 1 9 9 0 ) . L a b o r a t o r y - b a s e d s t u d -
i e s m u s t b e c o m p l e m e n t e d w i t h f i e l d w o r k , a n d t h e r a n g e o f
d e p e n d e n t m e a s u r e s s h o u l d b e b r o a d e n e d t o i n c l u d e a w i d e r
r a n g e o f c o g n i t i v e , e x p e r i e n t i a l , p h y s i o l o g i c a l , a n d b e h a v i o r a l
m e a s u r e s .
I n a d d i t i o n , i t w i l l b e i m p o r t a n t t o c o n s i d e r h o w i n d i v i d u a l s '
e m o t i o n r e g u l a t o r y g o a l s ( e . g ., K i n g & E m m o n s , 1 9 9 0 ; S w i n -k e l s & G i u l i a n o , 1 9 9 5 ) a n d s p o n t a n e o u s l y c h o s e n s t r a t e g i e s
( e . g . , B a n d u r a & R o s e n t h a l , 1 9 6 6 ) a f f e c t p r o x i m a l i n t ra i n d i v i d -
u a l a n d i n t e r p e r s o n a l f u n c t i o n i n g , a s w e l l a s m o r e d i s t a l p s y c h o -
l o g i c a l a n d p h y s i c a l h e a l th o u t c o m e s . F o r e x a m p l e , d o e s t h e
e f f e c t o f r e a p p r a i s a l d e p e n d o n w h e t h e r s o m e o n e h a b i t u a l l y u s e s
t h i s s t r a t e g y ? O r h o w , s p e c i f i c a l l y , a p e r s o n g o e s a b o u t t r y i n g
t o re a p p r a i s e a p o t e n t i a l l y e m o t i o n - e l i c i t i n g s i t u a ti o n ? C o m p l e -
m e n t i n g t h i s i d i o g r a p h i c a p p r o a c h , n o m o t h e t i c a n a l y s e s w i l l b e
n e e d e d t o i n t e g r a t e b r o a d e r b u t r e l a t e d c o n s t r u c t s , s u c h a s t h e
i n t e r n a l i z e r - e x t e rn a l i z e r d i m e n s i o n ( B u c k , 1 9 79 ; C a c i o p p o e t
a l ., 1 9 9 2 ) , d i v e r s e f a c e t s o f e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i v i t y ( G r o s s &
J o h n , 1 9 9 7 ) , e m o t i o n a l a m b i v a l e n c e ( K i n g & E m m o n s , 1 9 9 0 ) ,
a n d e m o t i o n a l i n t e l l ig e n c e ( G o l e m a n , 1 9 9 5 ; S a lo v e y , H s e e , &
M a y e r , 1 9 9 3 ) . B y e x a m i n i n g t h e s e p e r s o n a l a n d c o n t e x t u a l f a c -
t o rs , w e w i l l le a r n w h e t h e r s o m e p e o p l e a r e b e t t e r s u i te d c o g n i -
t i v e ly a n d t e m p e r a m e n t a l l y t o u s e s o m e e m o t i o n r e g u l a t o r y s t r a t -
e g i e s r a t h e r t h a n o t h e r s i n p a r t i c u l a r s i t u a t i o n s ( e . g . , E n g e b r e t -
s o n , M a t t h e w s , & S c h e i e r, 1 9 8 9 ; R o t h b a r t & A h a d i , 1 9 9 4 ) .
S u m m a r y
I n t h e c o m p l e x s o c i a l w o r l d i n w h i c h w e l i v e , s t r o n g e m o t i o n s
o c c a s i o n a l l y m a y b e u n w e l c o m e ( e . g . , w h e n t h e y c o m p r o m i s e
t a s k p e r f o r m a n c e o r b e t r a y s e c r e t p r e f e r e n c e s ) . A t s u c h t i m e s ,
w e a t t e m p t t o r e g u l a t e o u r e m o t i o n s , a n d I h a v e s u g g e s t e d t h a t
w e m a y d o s o i n t w o q u i t e d i f f e r e n t w a y s . T h e f i r s t i s t o r e a p -
p r a i s e o u r c i r c u m s t a n c e s s o a s t o a l t e r t h e i r e m o t i o n a l i m p a c t .T h i s s t u d y h a s s h o w n t h a t s u c h r e a p p r a i sa l s d e c r e a s e e x p r e s s i v e
b e h a v i o r a n d s u b j e c t i v e e x p e r i e n c e . T h e s e c o n d i s to i n h i b i t
e m o t i o n - e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r o n c e t h e e m o t i o n i s a l r e a d y u n d e r
w a y . T h i s s t u d y h a s s h o w n t h a t s u c h e m o t i o n a l s u p p r e s s i o n
d e c r e a s e s e x p r e s s i v e b e h a v i o r , b u t d o e s n o t a f f e c t s u b j e c t i v e
e x p e r i e n c e , a n d a c t u a l l y i n c r e a s e s c e r t a i n a s p e c t s o f p h y s i o l o g i -
c a l r e sp o n d i n g . W i t h t h e s e d i v e r g e n t c o n s e q u e n c e s i n m i n d , I
h a v e s p e c u l a t e d t h a t c e r t a i n f o r m s o f a n t e c e d e n t - f o c u s e d e m o -
t i o n r e g u l a t i o n ( e . g . , r e a p p r a i s a l ) o f t e n m a y b e b e t t e r f o r o n e ' s
h e a l t h th a n c e r t a i n f o r m s o f re s p o n s e - f o c u s e d e m o t i o n r e g u l a -
t i o n ( e . g . , s u p p r e s s i o n ) .
R e f e r e n c e s
Alexander, F. (19 39 ). Psychological aspects of medicine. Psychosomatic
Medic ine , 1, 7-1 8.
Alexander, F. (1950 ) . Psychosomatic medicine: Its principles a nd appli-
cations. New York: Nor ton.
Alexander, F. , & French, T M . (194 6) . Psychoanalytic therapy: Princi-
ples and applications. New York: Ronald Press .
Arnold, M. A. (1960) . Emotion and personali ty. New Yor k : C o lumbia
University Press.
Bandura, A. , & Rosenthal , T . L. (19 66) . Vicar iou s class ical condi t ioning
as a funct ion of arousal level . Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 3, 5 4 - 6 2 .
Bar low, D . H. (198 8) . Anxiety and its disorders. New York: Gui l ford
Press.
Barlow, D . H. ( 1991 ). Disorders of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 2,
5 8 - 7 1 .
Beck, A. T, R ush, A. J . , Shaw, B. F. , & Emery, G. (1 979 ) . Cognitive
therapy of depression. New York: Gui l ford Press.
Bro wn , L. L., Tomarken, A. J. , Orth, D. N ., Loosen, P. T., Kalin, N . H., &
Davidson, R. J . (1996 ) . Individual dif ferences in repress ive -defe n-
siveness predict basal salivary cortisol levels. Journal o f Personality
and Social Psychology, 70, 3 6 2 - 3 7 1 .
Buck, R. (1979). Individual differences in non-verbal sending accuracy
and electrodermal responding: The externa l izing- inte rnal izing dimen-
sion. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in non-verbal communication (pp.
140-170) . Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager , Gunn & Hain.
Cacioppo, J . T ., Klein, D .J . , Bem tson, G. G. , & Hatf ield, E. (19 93) .
The psychophys iology of emotion. In M. Lew is & J .M . Hav i land
( E ds . ) , Handbook of emotions (pp. 109 - 142 ) . New York: Gui l ford
Press.
Cacioppo, J. T., Uc hino , B. N., Crites, S . L., Snydersmith, M. A ., Smith,
G. , Berntson, G. G . , & Lang, P. J . (1992) . Relationship betwe en facial
expressiveness and sympathetic activation in emotion: A critica l re-
view, with emp has is on mo del ing underlying mechanisms and individ-
ual differences. Journal o f Personality an d Social Psychology, 62,1 1 0 - 1 2 8 .
Camp os, J. J ., Camp os, R. G., & Barrett, K. C. (198 9). E mergent them es
in the s tudy o f emotional development and e mo tion regulat ion. Devel-
opmental Psychology, 25, 3 9 4 - 4 0 2 .
Catanzaro, S. J . , & Meatus, J . (19 90 ). M easuring generalized ex pectan-
cies for negative mo od regulation: Initial scale development and imp li-
cations. Journal o f Personality Assessment, 54, 5 4 6 - 5 6 3 .
Dandoy, A. C. , & Golds tein, A . G. (19 90) . The use o f cogni t ive appraisal
to reduce stress reactions: A replication. Journal o f Social Behavior
and Personality, 5, 2 7 5 - 2 8 5 .
Darwin, C. (1965) . The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
Chicago: Univers i ty of Chicago Press . (Original work publ ished
1872)
Diens tbier , R . A. (19 89) . Arousal and phys iological toughness : Implica-
tions for mental and physical health. Psychological Review, 96, 8 4 -
100.
Dunbar , F. (1954) . Emotions and bodily changes (3rd ed. ) . New York:
Colum bia Univers i ty Press.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Maszk, P. , Smith, M., & Kar-
bon, M. ( 1995 ) . The role o f emotional i ty and regulat ion in chi ld ren 's
social funct ion ing: A longitudinal s tudy . Child Development, 66,
1360- 1384 .
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expres-
s ion of emotion. In J . Cole (Ed. ) , Nebraska Sympo sium o n Motivation,
1971 (pp. 20 7-2 83 ) . Lincoln: Univers i ty of Nebraska Press.
Ekman, P. (1994) . Strong evide nce for universals in facial express ions:
A reply to Russell 's mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115,
2 6 8 - 2 8 7 .
Ekman, P., & Fr iesen, W. V. (196 9) . The reper toire of nonverbal behav -ior: Categories, origin, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 4 9 - 9 8 .
Ekman, P. , Fr iesen, W. V. , & An col i , S . (1980) . Facial s igns of emotional
experience. Journal o f Personality an d Social Psychology, 39, 1 1 2 4 -
1134.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W . V., & O 'Sul l ivan , M. (1988 ) . Sm iles when lying.
Journal o f Personality an d Social Psychology, 54, 4 1 4 - 4 2 0 .
Engebretson, T. O., Matthews, K. A., & Scheier, M. F. (1989). Relations
between anger express ion and cardiovascular react ivi ty: Reconci l ing
inconsistent findings through a matching hypothesis. Journal o f Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 57 , 513- 521 .
Es terl ing, B. A. , Antoni , M. H. , Kumar , M. , & Schneiderman, N. (199 0) .
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 13/14
2 3 6 G R O S S
Emotional repression, stress disclosure responses, and Epstein-Barr
viral capsid antigen titers. Psy c h o so ma t i c M e d i c in e , 5 2 , 397-410.
Fawzy, E I., Fawzy, N. W., Hyun, C. S., Elashoff, R., Guthrie, D., Fahey,
J. L., & Morton, D. L. (1993). Malignant melanoma: Effects of an
early structured psychiatric intervention, coping, and affective state
on recurrence and survival 6 years later. Arc h i v e s o f Ge n e ra l P sy c h i a -
try, 50, 681-689.
Felten, S. Y., & Felten, D. L. (1994) . Neural-immune interactions. Pro g -ress in Bra in Research, 100, 152-157.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Ways o f Coping Quest ionnaire .
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Fox, N. J. (Ed.). (1994) . The development of emotion regulation: Bio-
logical and behavioral considerations. M o n o g ra p h s o f t h e S o c i e ty f o r
Re se a rc h i n C h i l d De v e l o p me n t , 5 9 (2-3, Serial No. 240).
Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id . In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.),
Th e s t a n d a rd e d i t io n o f t h e c o mp l e t e p sy c h o l o g i c a l w o rk s o f S i g mu n d
F r e u d (Vol. 19, pp. 3-66). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work
published 1923)
Friedman, H. S., & Booth-Kewley, S. (1987). Personality, Type A behav-
ior, and coronary heart disease: The role of emotional expression.
J o u rn a l o f Pe r so n a l i t y a n d S o c i a l Psy c h o l o g y , 5 3 , 783-792.
Frijda, N. H. (1986).The emot ions .
Cambridge, England: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologis t , 43 ,
349-358.
Garber, J., & Dodge, K. A. (Eds.). ( 1991 ). Th e d e v e l o p me n t o f e mo t i o n
regula t ion and dysregula t ion . Cambridge, England: Cambridge Uni-
versity Press.
Goleman, D. ( 1995 ). Emot ional in te l l igence . New York: Bantam Books.
Gross, J. (198 9). Emotional expression in cancer onset and progression.
S o c i a l S c i e n c e a n d M e d i c in e , 2 8 , 1239-1248.
Gross, J.J. (1998). Emotion regulation. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. C., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Gottestam, K., &
Hsu, A. Y. C. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression,
and control. Psy c h o l o g y a n d Ag i n g , 1 2 , 590-599.
Gross, J. J., Feldman Barrett, L. A., & Richards, J. M. (1998). Emo t i o n
regula t ion in everyday l i fe . Manuscript in preparation.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1997). Revealing feelings: Facets of emo-
tional expressivity in self -reports , peer ratings, and behavior. J o u rn a l
o f Pe r so n a l i t y a n d S o c i a l Psy c h o l o g y, 7 2 , 435-448.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity:
Multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. J o u rn a l o f Pe r so n a l -
ity and Socia l Psychology, 74, 170-191.
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiol-
ogy, self-report, and expressive behavior. J o u rn a l o f Pe r so n a l i t y a n d
Soc ial Psychology, 64, 970-986.
Gross , J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995) . Emotion elicitation using films.
Cogni t ion and Emot ion , 9 , 87-108.
Gross, J.J., & Levenson, R.W. (1997). Hiding feelings: The acute
effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. J o u rn a l o f Ab n o r -ma l Psychology, 106, 95-103.
Gross, J.J., & Mufioz, R. E (199 5). Emotion regulation and mental
health. Clin ica l Psychology: Sc ience and Pract ice , 2, 151 - 164.
Haan, N. (1993). The assessment of coping, defense, and stress. In L.
Goldberger (Ed.), Han dbook o f ' s t ress: Theo ret ica l and c l in ica l as-
p e c t s (2nd ed., pp. 258-27 3) . New York: Free Press.
Halliday, J. L. (1937). Approach to asthma. Br i t i sh J o u rn a l o f M e d i c a l
Psychology, 17, 1-53.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). Th e ma n a g e d h e a r t : C o mme rc i a l i za t i o n o f
h u ma n f e e l i n g . Berkeley: University of California Press.
Izard, C. E. (1977). Hu ma n e mo t i o n s . New York: Plenum.
Izard, C. E. (1994). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence
from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psy c h o l o g i c a l B u l l e-
tin, 115, 288-299.
Katz, L., & Epstein, S. (1991). Constructive thinking and coping with
laboratory-induced stress. J o u rn a l o f Pe r so n a l i ty a n d S o c i a l Psy c h o l -
ogy, 61, 789-800.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1991). Stress and immune function
in humans. In R. Ader, D. L. Felten, & N. Cohen ( Eds .), Psy c h o n e u -
ro i mmu n o l o g y (2nd ed., pp. 849-867). San Diego, CA: AcademicPress.
King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over emotional expres-
sion: Psychological and physical correlates. J o u rn a l o f Pe r so n a l i t y
and Socia l Psychology, 58 , 864-877.
Krantz, D. S., & Manuck, S. B. (1984). Acute psychophysiologic reac-
tivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodologic
critique. Psychologica l Bul le t in , 3 , 435-464.
Lang, P. J. ( 1995 ). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and atten-
tion. American Psychologis t , 50 , 372-385.
Lang, P. J., Rice, D. G., & Sternbach, R. A. (1972). The psychophysiol-
ogy of emotion. In N. J. Greenfield & R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), H a n d -
b o o k o f p sy c h o p h y s i o l o g y (pp. 62 3-6 43). New York: Holt, Rine-
hart & Winston.
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emo t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n . New York: Oxford
University Press.
Lazarus, R. S., & Alfert, E. (1964). Short-circuiting of threat by experi-
mentally altering cognitive appraisal. J o u r n a l o f A b n o r m a l a n d S o c i al
Psychology, 69, 195-205.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress , appra isa l and coping .
New York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. S., & Opton, E. M., Jr. (19 66) . The study of psychological
stress: A summary of theoretical formulations and experimental find-
ings. In C.D. Spielberger (Ed.), An x i e t y a n d b e h a v i o r (pp. 225-
262). New York: Academic Press.
LeDoux, J. E. (1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain.
Cogni t ion and Emot ion , 3 , 267-289.
Levenson, R. W. (1992). Autonomic nervous system differences among
emotions. Psych ologica l Sc ience, 3 , 23-27.
Levenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ek-man & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), Fu n d a me n t a l q u e s t i o n s a b o u t t h e n a -
t u re o f e mo t i o n (p p . 123 -12 6). New York: Oxford University Press.
Maier, S. F., Watkins, L. R., & Fleshner, M. (1994). Psychoneuroimmu-
nology: The interface between behavior, brain, and immunity. A m e r i -
can Psychologis t , 49 , 1004-1017.
Manuck, S. B., & Krantz, D. S. (1986). Psychophysiologic reactivity in
coronary heart disease and essential hypertension. In K. A. Matthews,
S. M. Weiss, T. Detre, T. M. Dembroski, B. Falkner, S. B. Manuck, &
R. B. Williams, Jr. (Eds.), Ha ndboo k o f st ress , reac t iv i~ , and card io-
v a sc u l a r d i se a se (pp. 11-34) . New York: Wiley.
Meichenbaum, D.A. (1985). Stress inoculation training. New York:
Pergamon Press.
Mischel, W. (1974). Processes in delay of gratification. In L. Berkowitz
(Ed.), Ad v a n c e s i n e x p e r i me n t a l so c i a l p sy c h o l o g y (Vol. 7, pp. 249-
291 ). New York: Academic Press.Morris, W.N., & Reilly, N.P. (1987). Toward the self-regulafion of
mood: Theory and research. Motiva t ion and Emot ion , 11 , 215-249.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Parker, L.E. , & Larson, J. (1994) . Ruminative
coping with depressed mood following loss. Journ al o f Personal i~ . ,
and So cia l Psycholog3; 67 , 92-104.
Obrist, P. A. ( 1981 ). C a rd i o v a sc u l a rp sy c h o p h y s i o l o g y . New York: Ple-
num Press.
O'Leary, A. (199 0). Stress, emotion, and human immune function. Psy -
chologica l Bul le tin , 108 , 363-382.
Pennebaker, J. (1990). Op e n i n g u p : Th e h e a l i n g p o w e rs o f c o n f id i n g i n
others. New York: Morrow.
Pennebaker, J., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1988). Disclosure of
8/7/2019 Gross - Emotion Regulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/gross-emotion-regulation 14/14
T W O F O R M S O F E M O T I O N R E G U L A T I O N 237
t raumas an d imm une funct ion: Hea l th impl icat io ns for psychotherapy.
Journal o f Consulting an d Clinical Psychology, 56, 2 3 9 - 2 4 5 .
P l u t ch i k , R . (1 9 8 0 ) . Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. N ew
York: Harper & Row.
Ri p p e re , V . (1 9 7 7 ) . "W h a t ' s t h e t h i n g t o d o w h en y o u ' re fee l i ng d e -
p r e s s e d ? " - - A p i lo t s tu dy . Behavior Research and Therapy, 15, 1 8 5 -
191.
Roemer, L., & Bork ovec, T. D. (19 94) . E ffects of suppressing thoughtsab o u t emo t i o n a l ma t e r i a l . Journal of Abno rma l Psychology, 103,
4 6 7 - 4 7 4 .
Roter, D. L. , & Ew art , C. K. (19 92) . E mo t ional inhib i t ion in essent ia l
h y p e r t en s i o n : O b s t ac l e t o co mmu n i ca t i o n d u r i n g med i ca l v i s i t s?
Health Psychology, 11, 1 6 3 - 1 6 9 .
Ro t h b a r t , M. K . , & A h ad i , S . A . (1 9 9 4 ) . Temp eramen t an d t he d ev e l op -
ment of personality. Journal of Abno rma l Psychology, 103 , 5 5 - 6 6 .
Rothba um, E, W eisz , J . R., & Snyder, S. S. (198 2). Chan ging the world
an d ch an g i n g t h e se l f : A t w o -p ro cess mo d e l o f p e rce i v ed co n t ro l .
Journal of Personal ity and Social Psychology, 42, 5 - 3 7 .
Ru sse l l , J . A . ( 1 9 9 4 ) . I s t h e re u n i v ersa l reco g n i t i o n o f emo t i o n f ro m
facia l express ion? A review of the cross-cul tura l s tudies . Psychologi-
cal Bulletin, 11 5, 1 0 2 - 1 4 1 .
Salovey, P. , Hsee, C. K. , & Mayer, J . D. (1993). Emot ional in te l l igence
an d se l f -reg u l a ti o n . In D .M . W eg n e r & J .W . Pen n eb ak e r (Ed s . ) ,Handbook of mental control (p p . 2 5 8 -2 7 7 ) . En g l ew o o d C l i f f s , N J :
Prent ice Hal l .
Sap o l sk y , R .M. (1 9 9 4 ) . Wh y zebras don' t get ulcers. New York:
Freeman .
Say e t t e , M. A . (1 9 9 3 ) . A n ap p ra i sa l -d i s ru p t i o n mo d e l o f a l co h o l ' s e f -
fects on s t ress responses in socia l drinkers . Psychological Bulletin,
114, 4 5 9 - 4 7 6 .
Sche rer , K . (1 9 8 4 ) . O n t h e n a t u re an d fu n c t i o n o f emo t i o n : A co m p o n en t
p ro cess ap p ro ach . In K . R . Sch e re r & P . Ek man (Ed s . ) , Approaches
to emotion (p p . 2 9 3 -3 1 7 ) . H i l l sd a l e , N J : Er l b au m.
Sel igma n, M . E. P. ( 1991 ) . Learned opt imism. N ew Y o rk : K n o p f .
Shoda, Y. , Misch el , W., & Peake, P. K. (19 90) . Predic t ing adolescent
co g n i t i v e an d se l f - reg u l a t o ry co mp e t en c i e s f ro m p re sch o o l d e l ay o f
grat i f ica t ion: Ident i fy ing d iagnost ic condi t ions. Developmental Psy-
chology, 26, 9 7 8 - 9 8 6 .
Smi t h , A . C . , & K l e i n man , S . (1 9 8 9 ) . Man ag i n g emo t i o n s i n med i ca l
school : Stude nts ' contac ts wi th the l iv ing and the dead . Social Psychol-
ogy Quarterly, 52, 5 6 - 6 9 .
Smi t h , C . A . , & E l l sw o r t h , P . C . (1 9 8 5 ) . Pa t t e rns o f co g n i t iv e ap p ra i sa l
i n emo t i o n . Journal of Personal i ty and Social Psychology, 48, 8 1 3 -
838.
Smith , T. W. (1992). Host i l i ty and heal th : Current s ta tus of a psychoso-
mat ic hypothesis . Health Psychology, 11, 1 3 9 - 1 5 0 .
Speism an, J . C. , Lazarus, R. S., Mordkoff, A. , & Davison , L. (196 4).
Ex p e r i men t a l red u c t i o n o f s t re s s b a sed o n eg o -d e fen se t h eo ry. Journal
of Abno rma l and Social Psychology, 68, 3 6 7 - 3 8 0 .
Spiegel , D. , Bloom , J . R. , Kraemer, H. C. , Got thei l , E. (1989 ). Effect
o f p sy ch o so c i a l t re a t men t o n su rv i v a l o f p a t i en t s w i t h m e t a s ta t i c b rea s t
cancer. Lancet, 2, 8 8 8 - 8 9 1 .Steele , C. M., Spencer, S. J . , & Lynch, M. (1 993 ). Sel f- im age resi l ience
an d d i s so n an ce : Th e ro l e o f a f f i rma t i o n a l re so u rce s . Journal o f Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 64, 8 8 5 - 8 9 6 .
S t ep t o e , A . (1 9 8 1 ) . Psychological facto rs in cardiovascular disease.
New York: Academic Press .
S t ep t oe , A . (1 9 9 3 ) . S t re s s an d t h e ca rd i o v ascu la r sy s tem: A p sy ch o so c i a l
perspect ive . In S. C. Stanford & P. Salmon (Eds.) , Stress: F rom syn-
apse to syndrome (p p . 1 1 9 -1 4 1 ) . Lo n d o n : A cad emi c Press.
Steptoe, A., & Vogele, C. (19 86) . Are s t ress respon ses influenced by
co g n i t iv e ap p ra i sa l ? A n ex p e r i m en t a l co mp ar i so n o f co p i n g s t ra t egi e s .
British Journal o f Psychology, 77, 2 4 3 - 2 5 5 .
Su t t o n , R . I . ( 1 99 1 ). Ma i n t a i n i n g n o rms ab o u t ex p re ssed emo t i o n s : Th e
case of b i l l co l lectors . Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 2 4 5 -
268.
Swinkels , A. , & Giul iano , T. A. ( 1995 ) . The m easure men t and conceptu-
a l i z a t i o n o f mo o d aw aren ess : Mo n i t o r i n g an d l ab e l i n g o n e ' s mo o d
sta tes . Personality an d Social Psychology Bu lletin, 21, 9 3 4 - 9 4 9 .
Tav r i s , C . (1 9 8 4 ) . O n t h e w i sd o m o f co u n t i n g t o t en : Pe rso n a l an d
so c i a l d an g e rs o f an g e r ex p re ss i o n . In P . Sh av e r (Ed . ) , R e v i e w o f
personali ty and social psychology (pp. 1 7 0 -1 9 1 ) . B ev e r l y H i l ls , CA :
Sage.
Thayer, R. E. , Newman, J . R. , & McClain , T. M. (1994). Sel f-regula t ion
of mood: St ra tegies for changing a bad mood, ra is ing energy , and
reducing tension . Journal o f Personal ity and Social Psychology, 67,
9 1 0 - 9 2 5 .
Th o mp so n , R . A . (1 9 9 1 ) . Emo t i o n a l reg u l a t io n an d emo t i o n a l d ev e lo p -
ment . Educational Psychology Review, 3, 2 6 9 - 3 0 7 .
Tice , D. M., & Baum eister , R. E ( 1993 ) . Con tro l l ing anger: Sel f- induced
emo t i o n ch an g e . In D . M. W eg n e r & J . W . Pen n eb ak e r (Ed s . ) , Hand-
book o f mental control (pp. 258 - 277 ) . Englew ood C l i f t s , N J: Pren t ice
Hal l .
Tomkins, S. (1984). Affect theory . In P. Ekman (Ed.) , Emotion in the
human face ( 2 n d ed ., p p . 3 5 3 -3 9 5 ) . N ew Y o rk : Cam b r i d g e U n i v e rs it y
Press.
U rs i n , H ., & O l f f , M. (1 9 9 3 ) . Th e s t re s s re sp o n se . In S . C. S t an fo rd &
P. Sa l mo n (Ed s . ) , Stress: From synapse to syndrome ( p p . 3 - 2 2 ) .
London: Academic Press .
V a i l lan t , G .E . , & D rak e , R .E . (1 9 8 5 ) . Ma t u r i t y o f eg o d e fen se i n
re la t ion to D S M - I I I Axis II pe rsonal i ty d isorder. Archives o f General
Psychiatry, 42, 5 9 7 - 6 0 1 .
W eg n er , D . M. (1 9 9 4 ) . I ro n i c p ro cesse s o f men t a l co n t ro l. Psychologi-
cal Review, 101, 3 4 - 5 2 .
Weinberger, D. A. (1990). The const ruct val id i ty of the repressive cop-
ing s ty le . In J . L. Singer (Ed .) , Repression a nd dissociation: Implica-
tions fo r personality theory, psychopathology, and health ( p p . 3 3 7 -
386) . Chica go: Universi ty of Chicago Press .
W es t en , D . (1 9 9 4 ) . To w ard an i n t eg ra t i v e mo d e l o f a f fec t reg u l a t i o n :
Appl icat ions to socia l -psychological research . Journal of Personality,
62 , 6 4 1 - 6 6 7 .
Wil l iam s, R. B. , Jr . (19 86) . Pat terns of react iv i ty and st ress . In K. A.
Mat thews, S. M. Weiss , T. Det re , T. M., D emb roski , B . Falkner, S. B.
Man u ck , & R . B . W i l l i ams , Jr . (Ed s . ) , Handb ook of stress, reactivity,
and cardiovascular disease (pp . 109 -12 5 ) . New York: Wiley.
Za j o n c , R .B . , & Mc l n t o sh , D .N . (1 9 9 2 ) . Em o t i o n s re sea rch : So me
p ro mi s i n g q u es t i o n s an d so me q u es t i o n ab le p ro mi se s . Psychological
Science, 3, 7 0 - 7 4 .
R e c e i v e d S e p t e m b e r 6 , 1 9 9 6
R e v i s i o n r e c e i v e d J a n u a r y 3 1 , 1 9 9 7
A c c e p t e d F e b r u a r y 3, 1 9 97 •