group 2 (wto)

Upload: antriksh-verma

Post on 07-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    1/19

    WORLD TRADE

    ORGANIZATION

    SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:DR. LUXMI AARZOO DALAL

    NEHA LAKRA

    POOJA CHANDEL

    PRIYANKASINGH

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    2/19

    2

    INTRODUCTION

    The WTO was established on 1st January 1995 under the Marrakech Agreement,

    replacing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which

    commenced in 1948.

    The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an organization that intends to

    supervise and liberalize international trade.

    WTO focuses on derive from previous trade negotiations, especially from

    the Uruguay Round (19861994).

    The organization is currently endeavoring to persist with a trade negotiation

    called the Doha Development Agenda (or Doha Round), which was launched in

    2001.

    The WTO administers the trade agreements negotiated by its members, inparticular the GATT, the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services), and

    the TRIPS(Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights)

    The WTO has 153 members, representing more than 97% of total world trade and

    30 observers, most seeking membership.

    India is one of the founder member of the WTO.

    WTO is governed by a ministerial conference, meeting every two years.

    BASIC PRINCIPLES

    Five principles are of particular importance in understanding both the pre-1994 GATT

    and the WTO:

    Non-Discrimination:It has two major components: the most favored

    nation (MFN) rule, and the national treatment policy. Both are embedded in the

    main WTO rules on goods, services, and intellectual property, but their precise

    scope and nature differ across these areas. The principle of non-discrimination

    has one more dimension: national treatment. National treatment enjoins allmember countries to treat imported and locally produced goods equally. It only

    applies only after a product, service or item of intellectual property has entered

    the market.

    Transparency: The WTO members are required to publish their trade regulations,

    to maintain institutions allowing for the review of administrative decisions

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    3/19

    3

    affecting trade, to respond to requests for information by other members, and to

    notify changes in trade policies to the WTO. These internal transparency

    requirements are supplemented and facilitated by periodic country-specific

    reports (trade policy reviews) through the Trade Policy Review Mechanism

    (TPRM).

    Binding and enforceable commitments: The tariff commitments made by WTO

    members in a multilateral trade negotiation and on accession are enumerated in

    a schedule (list) of concessions. These schedules establish "ceiling bindings": a

    country can change its bindings, but only after negotiating with its trading

    partners, which could mean compensating them for loss of trade. If satisfaction is

    not obtained, the complaining country may invoke the WTO dispute settlement

    procedures.

    Reciprocity: It reflects both a desire to limit the scope of free-riding that may

    arise because of the MFN rule, and a desire to obtain better access to foreignmarkets. A related point is that for a nation to negotiate, it is necessary that the

    gain from doing so be greater than the gain available

    from unilateral liberalization; reciprocal concessions intend to ensure that such

    gains will materialize

    Safety Valves: A final principle embodied in the WTO is that, in specific

    circumstances, governments should be able to restrict trade. Four types of

    provisions exist in this connection.

    Goods and services meant for noneconomic objectives such as public

    health and national security.

    Industries likely to be injured by competition from imports.

    Articles aimed at ensuring fair competition.

    Provisions permitting intervention in trade for economic reasons.

    OBJECTIVES

    Raising standard of living and income, promoting full employment, expanding

    production and trade, and optimum utilization of world resources.

    Introduce sustainable development.

    Taking positive steps to ensure that developing countries, secure a better share of

    growth in world trade.

    Prompt trade flows by encouraging nations to adopt non-discriminatory and non-

    predictable policies.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    4/19

    4

    Establish procedures for solving trade disputes among members.

    FUNCTIONS

    Administering and implementing the multilateral and plurilateral trade

    agreements which together make up the WTO.

    Acting as a forum for multilateral trade negotiations.

    Seeking to resolve trade disputes.

    Overseeing national trade policies.

    Cooperating with other international institutes involved in global economic

    policy-making.

    DIFFERENCESB/WGATT AND THE WTO

    The GATT was a set of rules, a multilateral agreement, with no institutional

    foundation, only a small associated secretariat which had its origins in the

    attempt to establish an International Trade Organization in the 1940s. The WTO

    is a permanent institution with its own secretariat.

    The GATT was applied on a provisional basis even if, after more than 40 years,

    governments chose to treat it as permanent commitment. The WTO

    commitments are full and permanent.

    The GATT rules applied to trade in merchandise goods. In addition to goods, the

    WTO covers trade in services and trade-related aspects of intellectual property.

    While the GATT was multi-lateral instrument, by the 1980s, many new

    agreements had been added of a plurilateral, and therefore, selective nature. The

    agreements which constitute the WTO are almost all multilateral and thus,

    involve commitments for the entire memberships.

    The WTO dispute settlement system , more automatic and thus much less

    susceptible to blockages, than the old GATT system. The implementation of WTO

    dispute findings will also be more easily assured.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    5/19

    5

    The Structure of the WTO is dominated by its highest authority, the Ministerial

    Conference, composed of representatives of all WTO members, which is required

    to meet at least every two years and which can take decisions on all matters under

    any of the multilateral trade agreements. The day-to-day work of the WTO,however, falls to a number of subsidiary bodies; principally the General Council,

    also composed of all WTO members, which is required to report to the

    MinisterialConference.

    The General Council convenes in two particular forms - as the Dispute Settlement

    Body, to oversee the dispute settlement procedures and as the Trade Policy

    Review Body to conduct regular reviews of the trade policies of individual WTO

    members.

    The

    Council for Goods oversees the implementation and functioning of all theagreements covering trade in goods.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    6/19

    6

    The Committee on Trade and Development is concerned with issues relating to

    the developing countries and, especially, to the "least-developed" among them.

    The Committee on Balance of Payments is responsible for consultations between

    WTO members and countries which take trade-restrictive measures, in order to

    cope with balance-of-payments difficulties.

    Issues relating to WTO's financing and budget are dealt with by a Committee on

    Budget.

    WTO-THE WHOLE WORLD IN WHOSE HANDS

    The fundamental principles of such an agreement are:-

    Most favored nations (MFN) every signatory will extend to every other signatory

    member , the same and equal treatment in a non-discriminatory manner (All

    General

    Council

    Committee

    on Budget

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    7/19

    7

    nations weather rich or poor , weak or strong would be given same treatment by

    all the signatory members).

    The second principle isNational Treatment which means that the imported goods

    and domestically produced goods will be treated alike , except for the payment of

    custom duty at the time of import.

    GATT 23 original signatories

    AUSTRALIA

    LEBANON

    LUXEMBOURG

    THENETEHRLANDS

    NEW ZEALAND

    NORWAY

    PAKISTAN

    SOUTHERN RHODESIA

    SYRIA

    SOUTH AFRICA

    UNITED KINGDOM

    UNITED STATES

    INDIA

    BELGIUM

    BRAZIL

    BURMA

    CANADA

    CEYLON

    CHILE

    CHINA

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    8/19

    8

    CUBA

    CZECHOSLOVAKIA

    FRANCE

    GATT AND WTO

    The rationale of international trade is comparative advantage so that all countries

    benefit through open & fair international trade.

    In international trade predictability of rules and regulations governing import,

    standards ,tariffs , customs procedures and so on are absolutely necessary if there

    is orderly growth of trade.

    Realizing that trade would suffer if there is no stability , leading trading nations

    entered into the General Agreement On Tariff and Trade(GATT) in 1947-48 to

    ensure orderly and transparent international trade.

    GATT is a multinational treaty that was signed in 1948 by 102 countries with the

    objective of bringing down tariff and non-tariff barriers to international trade.

    Until 1994 the main concerns of GATT were to check DUMPING and

    UNETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES.

    The Uruguay Round Agreements of GATT(held during 1984-94) envisaged an

    Increase in the coverage of legal provisions and establishment of an institution

    called the World Trade Organization (WTO)

    AGREEMENTS OFWTO

    1. General Elimination of Quantitative restrictions(QRs):-

    No prohibitions or restrictions other than duties and taxes whether made

    effective through quotas, import or export licenses or other measures, shall be

    instituted or maintained by any contracting country on the importation of any

    product of any other member country( GATT,1947)

    QR refers to limits set by countries to restrict imports(or exports).This could bein the form of quota, licensing (special import license , restricted list and

    canalized list).

    Canalizing imports refers to allowing only a few firms to import specific items by

    the government agency responsible for monitoring the respective sector. Thus,

    QRs are measures other than duties , taken to restrict import.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    9/19

    9

    Import tariffs (duties) per se do not prevent entry of products.

    On the other hand, QRs can be more trade restrictive than tariff measures. So,

    WTO does not permit member countries to impose QRs under normal

    circumstances.

    But countries can impose QRs in non discriminatory manner for any of these

    reasons:-

    To safeguard the balance of payment position.

    As a safeguard measure when there is serious injury to domestic

    producers.

    Restrictions on any agricultural or fisheries product when there is

    temporary domestic surplus of the product.

    AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE (AOA)

    The original GATT was applicable to agricultural trade but it had loopholes.

    The agreement allowed member countries to use some non-tariff measures such

    as import quotas and to subsidize.

    As a result of this agricultural trade was highly distorted , especially with the use

    of export subsidies that normally would not have been allowed for industrial

    products.

    The objective of agriculture agreement is to reform trade in the sector and make

    policies more market oriented in order to improve predictability level forimporting and exporting countries alike.

    As per agreement, the developing countries dont have to cut their subsidies or

    lower their tariffs as much as developed countries and they were given extra time

    to complete their obligations.

    Special provisions have been made keeping in view the interests of the least

    developed economies

    AOA has 3 basic clauses:-

    Market access

    Domestic support

    Export subsidies

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    10/19

    10

    As per AOA tariff alone is the rule of market access in agricultural products.

    The commitment required conversion of all non-barriers into equivalent tariff

    rates i.e., levels of protection. (this conversion was called tariffication)

    The agricultural agreement distinguishes between support programmes that

    stimulate production directly and those who are considered to have no directeffect .

    Domestic subsidies that do have a direct effect on production and trade were to

    be reduced in countries where support exceeded level specified(using calculations

    known as total agreement measurement of support or total AMS)

    There are some categories of support measures that were not subject to

    reduction:-

    1. Green box measures These measures have minimum impact on trade and can

    be used freely. They include govt. services like research ,disease control,infrastructure and food security.

    Also include payments directly made to farmers that dont stimulate production

    such as certain forms of direct income support.

    2. Blue box measures- Include indirect payments to farmers where they are

    required to limit production ,certain government assisted programmes to

    encourage agricultural and rural development in developing countries and other

    measured when compared with the total value of the product or products

    supported.

    AGREEMENT ON TEXTILE AND CLOTHING(ATC) 1995-

    2004

    Before the agreement came into effect a large part of textiles and clothing exports

    from the developing countries to the industrial countries was subject to quota

    under special regime.

    Till the end of the Uruguay round, textile and clothing quotas were negotiated

    bilaterally and governed by rules of multi fibre arrangement(MFA).

    This provided scope for the application of selective quantitative restrictions when

    surge in imports of particular products caused severe damage to industry of

    importing country.

    MFA was a deviation from the basic GATT principle of non-discrimination.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    11/19

    11

    On january1, 1995 it was replaced by WTO agreement on textiles and clothing

    which removed these quotas.

    ARTICLE 3 of WTO deals with quantitative restrictions other than those under

    MFA.

    ARTICLE 5 of ATC contains rules and procedures regarding circumvention of

    quotas through trans shipment, re-routing ,false declaration of origin or

    falsification of official documents

    The textile Monitoring Body(TMB) was established to supervise the

    implementation of the ATC and ensure that they are in conformity with the rules.

    It is a quasi judicial standing body which consists of a chairman and 10 TMB

    members who discharge their functions by taking all decisions by consensus.

    GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN SERVICES(GATS)

    GATS is the first ever set of multilateral, legally enforceable rules covering

    international trade in services.

    GATS operates on 3 levels:-

    1. The main text containing general principles and obligations

    2. Annexes dealing with rules for specific sectors

    3. Individual countries specific commitments to provide access to their markets.

    4. Lists showing where countries are temporarily not applying the MFN principle of

    non-discrimination

    The agreement covers all internationally traded services .

    They are classified into 4 categories-

    1. Cross border supply(services from one country to the other)

    2. Consumption abroad(firms making use of a service in another country)

    3. Commercial presence(a foreign company setting branches in other countries to

    provide services)

    4. Presence of natural persons(people traveling from their country to the other to supply

    services there)

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    12/19

    12

    MFN treatment:- Treating ones trading partners equally. Under GATS if a

    country allows foreign competition in a sector , equal opportunities in that sector

    should be given to service providers from all other WTO countries.

    Transparency:-Govt. must publish all relevant laws and regulations so that

    foreign and govt. can use them to obtain info about regulations in any servicesector.

    Regulations:-govt. should regulate services reasonably , objectively and

    impartially

    International payments and transfers:-

    Once govt. has made a commitment to open a service sector to foreign

    competition , it must not normally restrict money from being transferred out of

    the country as payment for services supplied in that sector.

    (The only exception is when there are balance of payments difficulties and even

    in such cases the restrictions must be temporary and subject to other limits and

    conditions.)

    AGREEMENT ON TRADE RELATED INVESTMENT

    MEASURES(TRIMS)

    It recognizes that certain measures can restrict and distort trade and states that

    no member shall apply any measure that discriminates against foreigners or

    foreign products.

    According to this ,the govt. cannot impose measures which require particular

    levels of local procurement by an enterprise(local content requirements)

    It also discourages measure which limit a companys imports or set targets for the

    company to export(trade balancing requirements)

    AGREEMENT ON IMPORT LISCENCING

    The agreement on import licensing procedures says import licensing should be

    simple, transparent and predictable, if there are quantitative restrictions.For e.g.

    the agreement requires the government to publish sufficient information for

    traders to know how and why the licenses are granted.

    It also describes how countries should notify the WTO when they introduce new

    import licensing procedures or change existing procedures.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    13/19

    13

    The agreement offers guidance on how government should assess applications for

    license.

    It sets criteria for automatic licensing so that procedures used do not restrict

    trade.

    It also tries to minimize the importers burden in applying for the licenses, so that

    the administrative work does not restrict or distort imports.

    The agreement says that the agencies handling the licensing should not normally

    take more than 30 days to deal with an application , 60 days when all

    applications are considered at the same time. This is now part of the WTO

    package signed by all the WTO members.

    AGREEMENT ON VALUATION OF GOODSAT CUSTOMS

    The WTO agreement on custom valuation aims for a fair, uniform and neutralsystem for the valuation of goods for customs purposes a system that outlaws

    the use of arbitrary custom values.

    The Uruguay Round ministerial decision gives customs administrations the right

    to request further information in cases where they have reason to doubt the

    accuracy of the declared value of imported goods.

    AGREEMENT ON PRE-SHIPMENT INVESTMENT:

    Pre-shipment inspection is the practice of employing specialized companies to

    check the shipment details- essentially price, quality and quantity- of goodsordered from overseas.

    The purpose of it is to safeguard national interests like prevention of capital

    flight, commercial fraud and custom duty evasion.

    The WTO agreement recognizes that GATT principles and obligations apply to

    the activities of pre shipment inspection agencies mandated by governments. The

    obligations of exporting members towards countries using pre-shipment

    inspection includes non-discrimination in the application of domestic laws and

    regulations, prompt publication of those laws and regulations and the provisionof technical assistance where requested.

    The agreement establishes an independent review procedure. It is administered

    jointly by an organization representing inspection agencies and a body

    representing exporters. Its purpose is to resolve disputes between exporter and

    an inspection agency.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    14/19

    14

    AGREEMENT ON RULES OF ORIGIN

    RULES OF ORIGIN are the criteria used to define where a product was made.

    Rules of origin are also used to compile trade statistics, and for made in

    labels that are attached to the products.

    This agreement requires the WTO members to ensure that their rules of origin

    are transparent and do not have restricting, distorting or disruptive effects on

    international trade.

    The agreement aims for common( harmonized ) rules of origin among all the

    WTO members, except in some kinds of preferential trade. For e.g. , countries

    setting up a free trade area are allowed to use different rules of origin for product

    traded under their free trade agreement.

    AGREEMENT TO TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE

    (technical regulations and standards)

    The agreement on technical barriers to trade (TBT) tries to ensure that

    regulations, standards, testing and certification procedures do not create

    unnecessary obstacles.

    The WTOs version is a modification of the code negotiated in 1973-79 Tokyo

    round. However, the agreement recognizes the countries rights to set the

    standards they consider appropriate- for e.g. , for human, animal or plant life or

    health, for the protection of the environment or to meet other consumer

    interests. In order to prevent too much diversity, the agreement encouragescountries to use international standards wheresoevers appropriate.

    The agreement states that the procedures used to decide whether a product

    conforms with standards have to be fair and equitable. It discourages any

    methods that would give domestically produced goods an unfair advantage.

    The agreement also encourages countries to recognise each others testing

    procedures. In this way a product can be assessed to certify if it meets the

    importing countrys standard through testing in the country where it is made.

    Manufacturers and exporters also ought to know about the latest standards intheir prospective markets.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    15/19

    15

    AGREEMENT ON ANTI-DUMPING

    If a company exports a product at a price lower than the price it normally charges

    on its own home market, it is said to be dumping the product. WTO disciplines

    anti dumping actions, and it is often called the ANTI-DUMPING agreement.

    The WTO anti-dumping agreement covers:

    1. Detailed rules for calculating the amount of dumping.

    2. Procedures for initiating and conducting anti-dumping investigation.

    3. Rules on the implementation and duration (normally 5 years ) of anti-dumping

    measures.

    The agreement says that the member countries must inform the committee on

    anti-dumping practices about all preliminary and final anti-dumping actions,

    promptly and in detail.

    They must also report on all investigations twice a year.

    When differences arise members are encouraged to consult each other.

    They can also use the WTOs dispute settlement procedure.

    TRADE RELATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS(

    TRIPS)

    India has already implemented the TRIPS agreement by launching the product

    patent system from january 2005.

    Another notable point in this field has been in the passing of TRIPS plus

    legislation in the field of copyright law.

    The 1994 amendments to the Act of 1957 provides protection to all original

    literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, cinematographic films and sound

    recordings.

    The most recent changes as satellite broadcasting, software and digital

    technology under Indian copyright protection.

    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYAGREEMENT

    During the Singapore Ministerial Conference of WTO, a Ministerial declaration

    on trade in information technology products was adopted.

    This declaration aims to expand the world trade in information technology

    products .

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    16/19

    16

    India participated in the negotiations on the agreement from the early stages and

    after extensive discussions with trading partners, joined as a participant on April

    1, 1997.

    REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS:

    Although regional trade blocks are based on the principle of discriminatory trade,

    WTO has a special provision for this.

    Using this condition , many regional trade groups such as North American Free

    Trade (NAFTA), European Free Trade Area (EFTA), Association of South East

    AsianNations (ASEAN) and GulfCo-operativeCouncil (GCC) have been set up.

    India has been instrumental in setting up of the South Asian Association for

    Regional Cooperation (SAARC), whose major achievement in 1995 was the

    conclusion of the negotiations on trade preferences within the framework of the

    SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA).

    SAPTA became operational on december 7, 1995 and includes preferential tariff

    concessions on 226 items and product groups.

    The Indian Ocean rim Association for Regional Cooperation was formed along

    with 13 countries in the region.Economic cooperation is expected to take place in

    trade facilitation, promotion and liberalisation, promotion of foreign investment,

    promotion of scientific and technological cooperation, tourism and development

    of infrastructure and human resources.

    EVALUATION OFWTO

    BENEFITS:-

    WTO has made significant achievements in reducing the tariff and non-tariff

    barriers to trade. Developing countries too have been benefiting significantly out

    of it.

    The liberalization of investment has been resulting in increase in competition,

    efficiency of resource utilisation, improvement in quality and productivity and

    fall in prices and acceleration of economic development.

    WTO provides a forum for multilateral discussion of economic relations between

    nations.

    It has a system in place to settle trade disputes between nations.

    WTO has a mechanism to deal with violation of trade agreements.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    17/19

    17

    DRAWBACKS/CRITICISMS

    Negotiations and decision making in the WTO are dominated by the developed

    countries.

    Many developing countries do not have the financial and knowledge resources to

    effectively participate in the WTO discussions and negations.

    Because of the dependence of developing countries on the developed ones, the

    developed countries are able to resort to arms-twisting tactics.

    Many of the policy liberalizations are done without considering the vulnerability

    of the developing countries and the possible adverse effect on them.

    The WTO has not been successful in imposing the organization's disciplines on

    the developed countries.

    The developing countries have, in general, been getting a raw deal from the WTO.

    WTO & DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

    Do Developing Countries Suffer in the WTO System?

    The Wall Street Journal has reported that while the US and the EC are getting the

    best prices of the world trade pie, the developing countries are getting the crumbs.

    SPECIAL CONSIDERATION

    Some of the areas like TRIPs, TRIMs and services have been very sensitive as faras the developing countries are concerned as the Uruguay Round Agreements in

    them mean that the developing countries will have to lower the protection against

    competition from the unequal developed economies.

    In the previous Rounds, the UR also gives special considerations to developing

    countries, particularly to the least developed countries and to those with balance

    of payments problems.

    WTO AND INDIA

    The Uruguay Round Agreements and WTO have come in for scathing criticismsin India. Many politicians and others have argued that India should withdraw

    from the WTO.

    Criticisms are either baseless or due to lack of knowledge of the international

    trading environment& misinformation.

    Just meant to oppose the government by the opposition parties.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    18/19

    18

    Should India Quit WTO?

    Accepting the demand of some of the critics that India should withdraw from the

    WTO will be a big blunder that the nation can commit.

    By being a part of WTO India enjoys the most favoured nation(MFN)status with

    all other members of the WTO.

    Opting out would mean an infinitely laborious task of entering into bilateral

    negotiations with each and every one of the trading partners which would

    amount to having ones arms twisted bilaterally by the US, the EC and Japan,

    turn by turn ,on everything from intellectual property rights to NPT, human

    rights and environmentally clean technologies for packaging.

    INDIAS TRADE GAIN

    Estimates of Indias possible gain from the trade liberalization vary very wide- between $2 billion and $7 billion a year. Although the liberalization of trade in

    textiles is benefitting the developing countries , Indias gain largely depend on

    her competitive strength vis-a vis other textile exporters.

    Indias gain from the trade liberalization is much less than of many other

    developing countries ,such as the South East Asian economies and China,

    because-

    1. Indias share in the world trade is very low(less than one per cent).

    2. Its foreign trade-GDP ratio is very low.

  • 8/6/2019 group 2 (WTO)

    19/19

    19