group 4: institutional collaboration

6
Group 4: Institutional Group 4: Institutional Collaboration Collaboration Group members: Group members: Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) Didier Dervers (UMD) Didier Dervers (UMD) Richard Carroll (WWF) Richard Carroll (WWF) Brian Curran (WCS) Brian Curran (WCS) Lisa Steel (WWF) Lisa Steel (WWF) Bas Huijbregts (WWF) Bas Huijbregts (WWF) (IUCN) (IUCN)

Upload: dawn-bush

Post on 31-Dec-2015

26 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Group 4: Institutional Collaboration. Group members: Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) Didier Dervers (UMD) Richard Carroll (WWF) Brian Curran (WCS) Lisa Steel (WWF) Bas Huijbregts (WWF) (IUCN). Three levels of collaboration. Consortium Planning Team - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

Group 4: Institutional Group 4: Institutional CollaborationCollaboration

Group members:Group members: Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN)Bihini Won wa Musiti (IUCN) Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC)Jean-Pierre Agnangoye (RAPAC) Didier Dervers (UMD)Didier Dervers (UMD) Richard Carroll (WWF)Richard Carroll (WWF) Brian Curran (WCS)Brian Curran (WCS) Lisa Steel (WWF)Lisa Steel (WWF) Bas Huijbregts (WWF)Bas Huijbregts (WWF) (IUCN)(IUCN)

Page 2: Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

Three levels of Three levels of collaborationcollaboration

ConsortiumConsortium Planning TeamPlanning Team Service Providers/Cross-cuttersService Providers/Cross-cutters

Page 3: Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

ConsortiumConsortium

Question/Problem: Role/Responsibility of Question/Problem: Role/Responsibility of Consortium leaderConsortium leader

Need for ToR for Landscape Leader and Need for ToR for Landscape Leader and for ToR for non-lead Consortium for ToR for non-lead Consortium membersmembers

By-laws including conflict resolution By-laws including conflict resolution hierarchyhierarchy

Durability of different structuresDurability of different structures

Page 4: Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

Planning TeamPlanning Team

Problem: Problem: 1.1. How to integrate CARPE landscape planning How to integrate CARPE landscape planning

into the Plan de Convergence/COMIFAC into the Plan de Convergence/COMIFAC process?process?

2.2. How to integrate and harmonize CARPE How to integrate and harmonize CARPE landscape planning into different national LUP landscape planning into different national LUP initiatives?initiatives?

3.3. Who should participate/who should head Who should participate/who should head planning team?planning team?

Page 5: Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

Recommendations:Recommendations:COMIFACCOMIFAC

Revise ToR of National Coordination to be Revise ToR of National Coordination to be more inclusive of landscape planning process, more inclusive of landscape planning process, stated inclusion in Plan de Convergencestated inclusion in Plan de Convergence

Member of CARPE country teamMember of CARPE country team Link LUP processes to COMIFAC via National Link LUP processes to COMIFAC via National

CoordinatorsCoordinators Lobby for recognition of landscape planning Lobby for recognition of landscape planning

process (e.g. pilot sites for nat’l level “macro-process (e.g. pilot sites for nat’l level “macro-zonage” processes)zonage” processes)

Page 6: Group 4: Institutional Collaboration

Recommendations Recommendations (continued)(continued)

Lobby for support Lobby for support expansion/renforcement of national level expansion/renforcement of national level COMIFAC coordination from other COMIFAC coordination from other partners (French or upcoming german partners (French or upcoming german facilitation?) facilitation?)