group of geotechnical engineering university of cantabria ...university of cantabria, santander,...

16
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain Pore pressures during stone column installation 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Jorge Castro Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Upload: others

Post on 15-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Pore pressures during stone column installation

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

Jorge Castro Group of Geotechnical Engineering

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Page 2: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Outline

Introduction

Site characterization

Instrumentation

Data analysisPeaks of pore pressures

Influence of previous column installations

Pore pressure dissipation

Conclusions

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions 2/16

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

Page 3: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Introduction

3/16

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

Page 4: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization ●

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Site characterization

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

CPTU

BoreholeDepth(m)

γd

(kN/m3)W(%)

wL(%)

wP(%)

Between columns

4-4.6 17.0 21 35.4 19.5

8-8.6 17.2 22 34.2 16.8

10.1-10.7 16.4 22 32.2 16.3

Outside columns

2-2.6 17.8 18 21.8 16.7

4-4.6 17.0 22 33.0 18.3

6-6.6 17.4 19 33.6 18.1

8.6-9.2 17.3 21 26.6 8.4

Summary of index soil tests

4/16

Page 5: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization ●

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Site characterization

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

Borehole Depth(m) c'(kPa) Φ(º) cu

(kPa) cc cs

Between columns

4-4.6 25 26 29.5 0.130 0.020

8-8.6 20 25 30.5 0.110 0.017

10.1-10.7 15 28 0.109 0.012

Outside columns

2-2.6 70 32 0.086 0.008

4-4.6 23 29 78.0 0.123 0.016

6-6.6 31 26 166.5 0.118 0.012

8.6-9.2 30 30 57.0 0.065 0.006

Summary of oedometer, triaxial and unconfined compression tests

5/16

Cv

10-3/10-4

cm2/s

Page 6: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization ●

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Site characterization

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

Column properties

Triangular pattern

Dry bottom-feed method

Diameter dc = 0.8 m

Spacing de = 2.8 m

Area replacement ratio

ar

=0.074

Length L = 9 m

6/16

Page 7: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Instrumentation

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

ROADSUECA

PZ01_1-PZ01_2

PZ02_1-PZ02_2

PZ03_1-PZ03_2

4 m

7 m6,60 m

PZ01_1

PZ01_2

PZ02_1

PZ02_2

PZ03_1

PZ03_2

STONE COLUMN

5

7

6

4

3

2

1

7/16

Page 8: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Instrumentation

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

02468

1016:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00.0 17:30:00 18:00:00 18:30:00

Dep

th (m

)

050

100150200

16:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00.0 17:30:00 18:00:00 18:30:00

Time

Cur

rent

(am

pere

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

16:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00.0 17:30:00 18:00:00 18:30:00

PZ 01PZ 02PZ 03

Por

e pr

essu

re m

easu

red

(kP

a)

8/16

Page 9: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

0

10

20

30

0 1.5 3.0 4.5

4m7m

CO

LUM

N

k=22.2 kPaR=5.37m

k=22.8 kPaR=5.63 m

Distance to SC 1 (m)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re (k

Pa)

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

9/16

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛=Δ

rRku ln

First

column

installation

Elastic-perfectly

plastic

behaviour

uck 2=

Page 10: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

10/16

0

25

50

75

100

0 1.5 3.0 4.5

4m7m

CO

LUM

N

k=34.4 kPaR=4.89 kPa

k=73.4 kPaR=4.51 m

Distance to the column (m)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re (k

Pa) ⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛=Δ

rRku ln

Elastic-perfectly

plastic

behaviour

uck 2=

All

column

installations

Page 11: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 10 20 30 40 50

PZ 01PZ 02PZ 03

Peak of pore pressure at 4m (kPa)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re a

t 7m

(kP

a)

11/16

Page 12: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

1

2

3

4

5

1 2 3 4 5

PZ 01PZ 02PZ 03

u/u0 (4m)

u/u 0 (7

m)

12/16

Page 13: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

0

10

20

30

40

50

1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5

4

3

5

2

1

Distance to column (m)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re (k

Pa)

PZ01-1

0

10

20

30

40

50

1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5

6

3

4

5

2

1

Distance to column (m)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re (k

Pa)

PZ01-2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5

7

6

3

4

5

21

Distance to column (m)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re (k

Pa)

PZ02-2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5

6

3

4

5

2

1

Distance to column (m)

Pea

k of

por

e pr

essu

re (k

Pa)

PZ02-1

13/16

Page 14: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

0

20

40

60

80

00:00:00 00:03:00 00:06:00 00:09:00 00:12:00 00:15:00

PZ03-1 / SC 2PZ03-1 / SC 3PZ02-1 / SC 5

Time (hh:mm:ss)

Exc

ess

pore

pre

ssur

es (k

Pa)

14/16

Page 15: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Data analysis

15/16

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20

No fractured zonerf=2arf=3a

Time (days)

Exc

ess

pore

pre

ssur

es (k

Pa)

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 2 4 6

10 days1 day0.1 dayu0

CO

LUM

N

r (m)

Exc

ess

pore

pre

ssur

es (k

Pa)

Isochrones without fractured zone Consolidation curves at piezometer (r=1.6 m)

Ch

=10-2

cm2/s

Page 16: Group of Geotechnical Engineering University of Cantabria ...University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. Conclusions. 16/16. 18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy Results of field

Introduction ●

Site characterization

Instrumentation ●

Data analysis

Conclusions

University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Conclusions

16/16

18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy

Results of field instrumentation to study pore pressures during

stone column installation

Peaks of pore pressures fairly well matched by cavity

expansion theory

Depth influence

Previous column installation influence

Difficult to explain the fast dissipation