group of geotechnical engineering university of cantabria ...university of cantabria, santander,...
TRANSCRIPT
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Pore pressures during stone column installation
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
Jorge Castro Group of Geotechnical Engineering
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Outline
Introduction
Site characterization
Instrumentation
Data analysisPeaks of pore pressures
Influence of previous column installations
Pore pressure dissipation
Conclusions
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions 2/16
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
Introduction
●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Introduction
3/16
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
Introduction ●
Site characterization ●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Site characterization
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
CPTU
BoreholeDepth(m)
γd
(kN/m3)W(%)
wL(%)
wP(%)
Between columns
4-4.6 17.0 21 35.4 19.5
8-8.6 17.2 22 34.2 16.8
10.1-10.7 16.4 22 32.2 16.3
Outside columns
2-2.6 17.8 18 21.8 16.7
4-4.6 17.0 22 33.0 18.3
6-6.6 17.4 19 33.6 18.1
8.6-9.2 17.3 21 26.6 8.4
Summary of index soil tests
4/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization ●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Site characterization
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
Borehole Depth(m) c'(kPa) Φ(º) cu
(kPa) cc cs
Between columns
4-4.6 25 26 29.5 0.130 0.020
8-8.6 20 25 30.5 0.110 0.017
10.1-10.7 15 28 0.109 0.012
Outside columns
2-2.6 70 32 0.086 0.008
4-4.6 23 29 78.0 0.123 0.016
6-6.6 31 26 166.5 0.118 0.012
8.6-9.2 30 30 57.0 0.065 0.006
Summary of oedometer, triaxial and unconfined compression tests
5/16
Cv
≈
10-3/10-4
cm2/s
Introduction ●
Site characterization ●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Site characterization
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
Column properties
Triangular pattern
Dry bottom-feed method
Diameter dc = 0.8 m
Spacing de = 2.8 m
Area replacement ratio
ar
=0.074
Length L = 9 m
6/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation
●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Instrumentation
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
ROADSUECA
PZ01_1-PZ01_2
PZ02_1-PZ02_2
PZ03_1-PZ03_2
4 m
7 m6,60 m
PZ01_1
PZ01_2
PZ02_1
PZ02_2
PZ03_1
PZ03_2
STONE COLUMN
5
7
6
4
3
2
1
7/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation
●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Instrumentation
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
02468
1016:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00.0 17:30:00 18:00:00 18:30:00
Dep
th (m
)
050
100150200
16:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00.0 17:30:00 18:00:00 18:30:00
Time
Cur
rent
(am
pere
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
16:00:00 16:30:00 17:00:00.0 17:30:00 18:00:00 18:30:00
PZ 01PZ 02PZ 03
Por
e pr
essu
re m
easu
red
(kP
a)
8/16
0
10
20
30
0 1.5 3.0 4.5
4m7m
CO
LUM
N
k=22.2 kPaR=5.37m
k=22.8 kPaR=5.63 m
Distance to SC 1 (m)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re (k
Pa)
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
9/16
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛=Δ
rRku ln
First
column
installation
Elastic-perfectly
plastic
behaviour
uck 2=
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
10/16
0
25
50
75
100
0 1.5 3.0 4.5
4m7m
CO
LUM
N
k=34.4 kPaR=4.89 kPa
k=73.4 kPaR=4.51 m
Distance to the column (m)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re (k
Pa) ⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛=Δ
rRku ln
Elastic-perfectly
plastic
behaviour
uck 2=
All
column
installations
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50
PZ 01PZ 02PZ 03
Peak of pore pressure at 4m (kPa)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re a
t 7m
(kP
a)
11/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5
PZ 01PZ 02PZ 03
u/u0 (4m)
u/u 0 (7
m)
12/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
0
10
20
30
40
50
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
4
3
5
2
1
Distance to column (m)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re (k
Pa)
PZ01-1
0
10
20
30
40
50
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
6
3
4
5
2
1
Distance to column (m)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re (k
Pa)
PZ01-2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
7
6
3
4
5
21
Distance to column (m)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re (k
Pa)
PZ02-2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
6
3
4
5
2
1
Distance to column (m)
Pea
k of
por
e pr
essu
re (k
Pa)
PZ02-1
13/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
0
20
40
60
80
00:00:00 00:03:00 00:06:00 00:09:00 00:12:00 00:15:00
PZ03-1 / SC 2PZ03-1 / SC 3PZ02-1 / SC 5
Time (hh:mm:ss)
Exc
ess
pore
pre
ssur
es (k
Pa)
14/16
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Data analysis
15/16
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20
No fractured zonerf=2arf=3a
Time (days)
Exc
ess
pore
pre
ssur
es (k
Pa)
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 2 4 6
10 days1 day0.1 dayu0
CO
LUM
N
r (m)
Exc
ess
pore
pre
ssur
es (k
Pa)
Isochrones without fractured zone Consolidation curves at piezometer (r=1.6 m)
Ch
=10-2
cm2/s
Introduction ●
Site characterization
●
Instrumentation ●
Data analysis
●
Conclusions
University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Conclusions
16/16
18 EYGEC, 17-20 June 2007, Ancona, Italy
Results of field instrumentation to study pore pressures during
stone column installation
Peaks of pore pressures fairly well matched by cavity
expansion theory
Depth influence
Previous column installation influence
Difficult to explain the fast dissipation