guidelines for slope stability with lightweight fillbartlett/geoomaha/guidelines for slope... ·...

19
2/4/2018 1 Guidelines for Slope Stability Improvement with Lightweight Fill Steven Bartlett, University of Utah 1 Design methodology overview David Arellano, University of Memphis 2

Upload: lamthu

Post on 27-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2/4/2018

1

Guidelines for Slope Stability Improvement with Lightweight FillSteven Bartlett, University of Utah

1

Design methodology overviewDavid Arellano, University of Memphis

2

2/4/2018

2

Outline

Overview Design methodologyConstruction practices & cost considerations Update on previous standard for slope stability

applicationsQuestion and answer session

3

OverviewProblem Statement

New roadway alignments and/or widening of existing roadway embankments will be required to solve the current and future highway capacity problem.

Roadway construction often exacerbates the landslide problem in hilly areas by alternating the landscape, slopes, and drainages and by changing and channeling runoff (Spiker and Gori, 2003).

Geofoam provides an alternative slope stabilization and repair technique that is based on reducing the driving forces.

4

2/4/2018

3

OverviewMajor Components of an EPS-Block Geofoam Slope System

5

US 160Durango, CO. Photos: Sutmoller

Slope stabilization

6

OverviewFirst Slide Remediation in U.S. with EPS blocks

2/4/2018

4

7

AL DOTAL DOT

Slope stabilizationOverviewSlide Remediation in Alabama

Overview of EPS Block Placement Configuration

8

AL DOT

Completed RoadRemediated Slide

OverviewSlide Remediation in Alabama

2/4/2018

5

Outline

Overview Design methodologyConstruction practices & other considerationsQuestion and answers

9

NCHRP 24-11(02)

10

a) Slope-sided fill.

b) Vertical-sided fill (Geofoam wall).

Design Methodology

2/4/2018

6

Static and Seismic Slope Stability (Existing Soil Slope Material Only)

11

Failure Modes External instability Internal instability Pavement system failure

Design Methodology

Key Assumptions of Design Procedure

Based on a self-stable adjacent upper slope to prevent earth pressures on the EPS fill mass that can result in horizontal sliding between blocks.

Based on the installation of a permanent drainage system.

12

2/4/2018

7

Static and Seismic Slope Stability (Both Fill Mass and Existing Soil Slope Material)

13

Complex Internal Failure

Design Methodology

External Seismic Stability Failure: Horizontal Sliding of the Entire Embankment & Overturning of an Entire Vertical Embankment about the Toe of the Embankment

14

Sliding

Overturning

Design Methodology

2/4/2018

8

Bearing Capacity Failure & Settlement

15

Bearing Capacity Failure

Settlement

Design Methodology

Internal Seismic Stability Failure Horizontal Sliding

16

Design Methodology

2/4/2018

9

Load Bearing Failure of the Blocks

17

e total FS

1. Selection of EPS type directly below the pavement system• Traffic and gravity stresses on top of the geofoam.

2. Selection of EPS type at various depths within the EPSblock fill mass.• Traffic and gravity load stresses at various depths

within the geofoam.

Design Methodology

Depth(m)

Estimated Largest Preliminary Stress

(kPa)

PreliminaryEPS Type

0.5 96 EPS390.75 58 EPS291.0 38 EPS192 26 EPS193 13 EPS194 15 EPS195 10 EPS19 18

Design MethodologyLoad Bearing (cont.)

2/4/2018

10

Pavement Design and Failure of Pavement System

19

Design Methodology

1Background investigation including stability analysis

of existing slope

2Select a preliminary type of

EPS and assume a preliminary pavement system

design (if necessary)

3Optimize volume & location

of EPS fill or assume a preliminary fill mass

arrangement

5Static slope stability

(external)acceptable?

6Seismic stability and overturning (external)

acceptable?

7Seismic stability

(internal)acceptable?

8Pavement system

design

9Does required pavement system result in a change in

overburden stress compared to the preliminary pavement system design developed in Step 2?

Return to Step 5

Yes

11Settlement(external)

acceptable?

12Bearing capacity

(external)acceptable?

10Load bearing

(internal)acceptable?

13Design Details

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Return to Step 3

Return to Step 3

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

OR

4Modify optimized EPS fill as

needed for constructability

Yes

No

Will inter-block connectors meet

Step 7 requirements?

Does slope include roadwayat head of slide?

(See Figure 13 (b))

-If yes, proceed to Step 8-If no, skip to Step 10

Return to Step 8 and modify pavement system

Return to Step 2 and use EPS blocks with higher

elastic limit stress

Optimize volume & location of EPS fill based

on required seismic stability. Modify

optimized fill as needed for constructability. Recheck static slope

stability.

No

No

20

Design Methodology

2/4/2018

11

21

Design Methodology(Steps)

Optimization Procedure

Stability analysis results from optimization procedure Stability analysis results of modified layout

Design Methodology

2/4/2018

12

23

Design Methodology

24Design Methodology

2/4/2018

13

25

Increasing Block Resistance

8Pavement system

design

9Does required pavement system result in a change in

overburden stress compared to the preliminary pavement system design developed in Step 2?

Return to Step 5(Static slope

stability)

No

Yes

Does slope include roadwayat head of slide?

(See Figure 13 (b))

-If yes, proceed to Step 8-If no, skip to Step 10

26

Design Methodology

2/4/2018

14

10Load bearing

(internal)acceptable?

Yes

NoOR

Return to Step 8 and modify pavement system

Return to Step 2 and use EPS blocks with higher

elastic limit stress

27

28

2/4/2018

15

Outline

Overview Design methodologyConstruction practices & other considerationsQuestion and answers

29

30

AL DOT

Typical EPS Block Placement Configuration(note alternating block pattern for each layer)

Construction practices & other considerations

2/4/2018

16

Long-Term DurabilityAaboe & Frydenlund (2011)

• 1972 Norway Flom Bridge• First major lightweight fill project.• Over 40 years of extensive worldwide use.

31

Construction practices & other considerations

Ultraviolet RadiationPhoto: Sutmoller

32

Construction practices & other considerations

2/4/2018

17

FlammabilityFrydenlund and Aabøe (1996)

Two known fires worldwide – both in Norway

Geofoam can be manufactured with flame retardant additives.

Storage and handling of geofoam blocks should be done with attention to fire safety.

33

Construction practices & other considerations

Photos: Sutmoller34

HydrocarbonsProtection

Construction practices & other considerations

2/4/2018

18

Groundwater Control During Construction

“Site flooding as a result of a heavy rain that caused previously placed blocks to float and move out of position was the underlying cause in all cases.”

(Horvath 2010)

35

Construction practices & other considerations

Placement of Subsurface Drainage

36

AL DOT

Subsurface Drainage System &Drainage Channel

Drainage Channel DivertsWater Away From Slope

Construction practices & other considerations

2/4/2018

19

Questions and Answers