gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: who …...muzzle reflection shock wave shock wave...

20
Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who shot first? Robert C. Maher Montana State University Bozeman 171 st Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Salt Lake City May 2016 Paper 2aAAa7

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who shot first?

Robert C. Maher Montana State University – Bozeman

171st Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America – Salt Lake City – May 2016Paper 2aAAa7

Page 2: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Outline• Introduction

– Audio forensic analysis– Gunshot acoustics– Forensic acoustical interpretation

• Example 1: who shot first?• Example 2: who shot first?• Conclusion

Page 3: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Introduction

• Audio Forensics is the field of forensic science relating to the acquisition, analysis, and evaluation of sound recordings that may ultimately be presented in court or some official venue.

• Primary forensic concerns:i. authenticityii. enhancementiii. interpretation and documentation

Page 4: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Gunshot Acoustics

• Confined combustion of gunpowder propels the bullet out of the gun barrel.

• The explosive gases expand rapidly behind the bullet causing the muzzle blast.

• The muzzle blast can exceed 150dB in the vicinity of the firearm.

• The muzzle blast is directional.

Page 5: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Gunshot Acoustic Evidence Near the Shooter

• Mechanical Action• Muzzle Blast• Supersonic Projectile (shock wave)• Surface Vibration• ReflectionsNote:

Limitations of microphone and audio recording chain (e.g., codecs)

Page 6: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Example Gunshot Recording

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

Time [ms]

Am

plitu

de [l

inea

r sca

le]

Ch 1 RCh 2 L

L R

Muzzle Blast

Muzzle Reflection

Shock Wave

Shock Wave Reflection

Page 7: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

9mm Handgun (anechoic)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

Time [msec]

Am

plitu

de [P

a]

Page 8: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Forensic Example 1

• Two armed perpetrators on a city street– Witnesses and evidence that both individuals

shot handguns, but not clear who fired first.– One of the individuals died due to gunshot

wound, the other individual survived and claims self defense.

– A residential surveillance system recorded the sound of gunfire, but not video of the scene.

– Who shot first?

Page 9: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

First two shots…

Echo: 0.54 s

Page 10: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

First two shots (cont.)

Page 11: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Echo 0.54 seconds

• Air temperature 16 celsius: c = 341 m/s• 0.54 seconds == 184 meters

Page 12: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Street Geometry

Distance: ~90 meters

Additional path: ~180 meters

Page 13: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Echo 0.54 seconds

• Echo explanation fits geometry, but why not a distinct echo for both gunshots?

Page 14: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Witnesses agree…

• Individual #1 (deceased) was pointing firearm southward

• Individual #2 (claiming self defense) was pointing firearm northward

• Conclusion: northward-pointing gun facing reflecting surface caused more distinct echo, so Individual #2 fired first.

Page 15: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Forensic Example 2

• Law enforcement officers approach a knife-wielding individual.– One officer has a Taser, the others have

handguns pointed at the suspect.– Shots are fired and the Taser is deployed.– Audio recordings made by Taser and by

nearby dashboard cameras in police cars– Which was first, gunshot or Taser?

Page 16: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Taser and Shots

Page 17: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Taser Sequence

Page 18: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Dashcam Recordings

Page 19: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Analysis• Initial sound of Taser is obscured.

– Dashboard recorders pick up gunshot sounds, but not Taser.

– Plan: work backward to align timing based on last gunshot.

• Conclusion:– First gunshot at 15.4 seconds– Taser deployment at 15.8 seconds– Gunshot precedes Taser by 0.4 seconds.

Page 20: Gunshot recordings from a criminal incident: Who …...Muzzle Reflection Shock Wave Shock Wave Reflection 9mm Handgun (anechoic) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12-800-600-400-200 0 200 400 600 800 Time

Conclusion• Care is needed to assess the validity of acoustic

analysis claims involving gunshot evidence.• Forensic gunshot recordings generally contain

background noise, distortion, clipping, multi-path reflections and reverberation.

• In some cases, timing analysis of the gunshot sounds and acoustic reflections is appropriate.

• Situations involving multiple concurrent recordings of the same event are particularly useful.