h->zz->4l update

22
H->ZZ->4l update 10/02/08

Upload: astin

Post on 05-Feb-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

H->ZZ->4l update. 10/02/08. Current Status. This was the first run through analysis chain from the cms note http://cms.cern.ch/iCMS/jsp/openfile.jsp?tp=draft&files=AN2008_050_v3.pdf Samples used: Hzz150 pythia Z’s forced to e, mu, tau’s Inlcuded 4e, 4mu enhancement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: H->ZZ->4l update

H->ZZ->4l update

10/02/08

Page 2: H->ZZ->4l update

Current Status

• This was the first run through analysis chain from the cms note– http://cms.cern.ch/iCMS/jsp/openfile.jsp?tp=draft&files=AN2008_050_v3.pdf

• Samples used:– Hzz150 pythia

• Z’s forced to e, mu, tau’s• Inlcuded 4e, 4mu enhancement• X section * BR = 0.01120 pb

– ZZ (qq->ZZ->4l, s + t channel), comphep• Z’s forced to e, mu, tau• Used a m4l dependent K factor• Xsection * BR = 0.131 pb

– Ttbar TopRex• Tt->WWbb; W -> e, mu, tau; b-> freely• Xsection * BR = 2.51 pb

– Zbb• Comphep• Z-> e, mu, tau; b->freely• Filter: 4 (e/mu w/pt > 2 and |eta| < 2.7)

Page 3: H->ZZ->4l update

Signal Fid Efficiency

• My version of Figure 3:– Den = h->ZZ->(4e, 4, or 2e2 inclusive)– Num = h->ZZ->(4e, 4, or 2e2 exclusive with || < 2.5)

Page 4: H->ZZ->4l update

Efficiency for Presel Cuts

• Combine figure 13 and 14– Various cuts for the preselection

• HLT (set to one for now)• Skim ( 2 l’s with pT > 10 and 1 w/pT > 5)• Two l+l- pairs• Two pairs ml+l- > 12 for both

• m4l > 100• Isolation requirement (e’s only)

Page 5: H->ZZ->4l update

#’s for Presel Cuts (4 mu channel)

h150 zz tt zbb

HLT 1 1 1 1skim 3 leps 0.987 0.978 0.983 0.8624 mu sel 0.83 0.978 0.983 0.8612 M2mu > 12 0.83 0.978 0.869 0.84m4l > 100 0.828 0.849 0.777 0.683loose iso 0.818 0.849 0.777 0.683

= # passing fid cut and passes cut (1-6) / # passing fid cut• Fid Cut:

• 4 leps (2e2mu, 4e, 4mu w/status=1) for signal

• same with |eta| < 2.5 for zz

• same with |eta| < 2.5 and pt > 2 for ttbar, zbb

Page 6: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel Kinematics -- lepton pT

Page 7: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel Kinematics -- lepton pT

Page 8: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel kinematics -- m2lBlue = ml+l- closest to mZ, red = the other ml+l-

Page 9: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel kinematics -- m2l

Page 10: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel kinematics -- m4l

Page 11: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel kinematics -- m4l

Page 12: H->ZZ->4l update

Presel m4l Stacked: normalized to xsection

Page 13: H->ZZ->4l update

Event Selection• We implemented the same cuts for selection (with

our variables)

• The numbers of events expected for 1 fb-1

sel 4e 4m 2e2mh150 0.5 1.14 1.28

zz 1.76 3.38 4.75tt 0 0.31 0.11

zbb 0.42 0.22 0.17

presel 4e 4m 2e2mh150 1.01 1.52 2.2

zz 4.9 8.1 8.4tt 19.7 65.7 54

zbb 12.4 31 20

Page 14: H->ZZ->4l update

Efficiency for Selection Cuts

Column1 h150 zz tt zbbIsolation 0.857 0.691 0.009 0.00152IP 0.857 691 0.009 0.0152pt 0.839 0.651 0.0063 0.011mZ1 0.839 0.651 0.0063 0.011mZ2 0.767 0.418 0.0046 0.0073

Page 15: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection Kinematics -- lepton pT

Page 16: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection Kinematics -- lepton pT

Page 17: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection kinematics -- m2l

Blue = ml+l- closest to mZ, red = the other ml+l-

Page 18: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection kinematics -- m2l

Page 19: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection kinematics -- m4l (norm to xsection)

Page 20: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection kinematics -- m4l (norm to xsection)

Page 21: H->ZZ->4l update

Selection kinematics -- m4l (norm to xsection)

Page 22: H->ZZ->4l update

M4l Stacked: normalized to xsection