hadron therapy medical applications - infn genova · 2004. 7. 6. · hadron therapy medical...

46
Hadron Therapy Medical Applications G.A. Pablo Cirrone On behalf of the CATANA – GEANT4 Collaboration Qualified Medical Physicist and PhD Student University of Catania and Laboratori Nazionali del Sud - INFN, Italy

Upload: others

Post on 01-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Hadron Therapy Medical Applications

    G.A. Pablo Cirrone

    On behalf of the CATANA – GEANT4 Collaboration

    Qualified Medical Physicist and PhD Student

    University of Catania and Laboratori Nazionali del Sud - INFN, Italy

  • What is the hadron-therapy?

    Use of ions for the radiotherapeutictreatment of tumours

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30depth cm of water

    % d

    ose

    resp

    onse

    8 MV X-rays200 MeV protons20 MeV electronscobalt 60

  • So we can answare to the question:Why clinical proton beams?

    • penetration depth is well-defined and adjustable

    • most energy at end-of -range

    • protons travel in straight lines

    • dose to normal tissue minimised

    • no dose beyond target

    PROTONS PERMIT TO DELIVER AN HIGH DOSE TOTHE TUMOUR SPARING THE SOURRONDING TISSUES

  • In Catania we developed a facility

    CATANAfor the treatment ofocular tumours with proton beams of 62

    AMeV

  • LNSSuperconducting Cyclotron is the

    unique machine in inItaly and South Europe used for protontherapy

    Treatment of thechoroidal melanoma

    In Italy about 300 new cases for year

  • Laboratori Nazionali del Sud –INFN Catania, Italy

    CyclotronLocation

    Proton BeamTreatment

    Room Location

  • •0 ° respect the switching magnet

    •80 meter after extraction

    •3 m proton beam line

    LAYOUT OF LNSPRESENT TREATMENT ROOM

  • Scattering system

    Modulator &Range shifter

    Monitorchambers

    Ligth field

    Laser

  • A brief description of the treatment

    •The surgical phase

    •The Treatment planning phase

    •The verification phase

    •The treatment phase

  • Surgical Phase (Tantalum clips insertions)

    CLIPS: characterizeposition and size oftumor volume

  • two X-Rays tubes for the visualization of the clips

  • Treatment Planning System

    EYEPLANEYEPLAN

    In origin developed by Michael Goiten eTom Miller ( Massachussetts General

    Hospital) e ora mainteined by Martin Sheen(Clatterbridge Center for Oncology) e Charle

    Perrett (PSI)

  • Treatment Planning System Output

    Isodoses curves for different planes

  • θ

    Fixation Light

    φ

    θ Polar Angleφ Azimutal Angle

    Isocenter

    Fixation Point

  • Patiens look at the fixation lightduring the treatment

    PROTON BEAM

  • Patient Distribution by Origin Region

    20

    6

    5

    5

    5

    4

    6

    20

    2

    1

    1

    N.B Total number of patients : 52

  • Hadron-Therapy Center of Sicilian Region

    Project approved on March, 7 2003

  • DETECTORS USED FOR DOSE DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENTS

    DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTION LATERAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION

    •Markus Ionization chamber •GAF Chromic Film

    2 mm

    Sensible Volume = 0.05 cm3

    Markus Chamber layout Irradiated GAF Chromic

    Resolution 100 µm for DDP and 200 µm for LDP

  • Experimental ‘PURE’ Bragg curve

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    Depth in water (mm)

    Rel

    ativ

    e Io

    nizz

    atio

    n (%

    )

    Markus Ionization Chamber

    31.150.503.194.6830.14MARKUS

    Practical Range(d10%, ICRU 59)

    Distal -dose

    falloffd80%-20%

    F.W.H.M.PEAK –PLATEAU

    RATIO

    PEAK DEAPTH

    DETECTOR

  • Experimental ‘modulated’ Bragg curve

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    0 10 20 30 40Depth in water (mm)

    Rel

    ativ

    e D

    ose

    (%)

    95%

    R90%

    80%

    20%

    Modulated region

  • Experimental Lateral Dose Distribution

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

    Distance from axis [ mm ]

    Sig

    nal [

    % ]

    Radiochromic Film

    R 90%-50% Ps [mm]

    Pd [mm]

    Simmetry [%]

    Homogeneity at 95% level

    [mm] LNS 0.92 0.8 1 2.4 21 CCO 0.93 0.75 0.75 2.6 23

  • Why to start a Simulation Work ?

    Therapy with hadrons still represents apioneering thecnique

    Today the development of ahadron-therapy facility requires a long

    experimental work due to the lack of SIMULATION TOOLS

    Our work is inserted in the more general medical-physics GEANT4 activity

    and represents just a different application of a moregeneral approach in the medical-physics field

  • Why to start a Simulation Work ?

    This work concerns mainly:

    Design and optimization of thetansport beam line elements:

    Test of the elements

    Test of the detectorsReconstruction of the dosedistributions:

    To measure dose distribution also in difficult experimental region

    To verify the radiotherapytreatment planning systems

  • Why to start a Simulation Work ?

    So we start our simulation work using GEANT4:

    •To simulate our complete beam linewith all its elements and

    •To riproduce all the dose distributions

    It’s impossible to conceive a modern detector w/o simulation

    Rossi and Greisen 1941, Rev. Mod. Phys. 13:240

  • Why GEANT4 for a Medical Application?

    User support from experts

    Free and “Transparent”code

    Transparency of physics Use of evaluated data libraries

    Independent validationby a large user community worldwide Specific facilities

    controlled by a friendly UI

  • Our GEANT4 Application:

    hadronTherapy.cc

    Complete simulation of CATANAhadron-therapy beam line with two dosemeters

    • Depth Dose Distribution in Water ( Bragg curve ):Markus type ionization chamber;

    • Lateral Dose Distribution:Radiochromic film;

    Each element of the line can be modified (in shape, material and position) and other kinds of dosemeters can be easily

    inserted

  • Design of hadronTherapy Application

    hadronTherapy design

  • Water box + detectorfor Bragg curve as simulated

    Bragg Curve Reconstruction

    Water box with ionisation chamber

  • Bragg Curve Reconstruction

    Detector is simulated with20 K air cylindrical slices, 200 µm thick to reproduce experimental Markus chamber responce

    Energy deposited ineach slice is collected

    We calculated range values for the detectorsimulation validation from Bragg curve

  • Validation of detector for the Bragg curve reconstruction Comparison with ICRU/NIST data

  • Beam Line elements simulation

    • Scattering system

    • Collimators system

    • Monitor chambers

    • Final and Patient’s collimator

  • Scattering system

    DOUBLE SCATTERER FOIL WITH CENTRAL STOPPER15 µm + 25 µm + 7 mm thick copper beam stopper

    Permits to obtain an homogeneus lateraldose distribution at isocenter

  • Collimators system

    Monitor chambers system

  • GEANT4 simulation

    Real hadron-therapy beam line

  • Primary Beam Characteristic

    On the basis of experimentals Bragg curves we were able to set the characteristics of the

    primary beam

    •Initial Energy

    •Energy Spread

    •Spatial Distribution

    •Momentum Distribution

  • Physics models

    StandardProcesses

    Standard +hadronic

    Low Energy Low Energy+ hadronic

  • “beam’s picture” at isocenter

  • Differenze al di sotto del 3% anche sul picco

    Beam Line Validation

    Package basse energie+

    fisica adronica

  • WATER

    Beam Line Validation

    ALLUMINUMRanges comparison with experimental datafor water and copper

  • Lateral Dose Validation

    Difference in penumbra = 0.5 %

    Difference in FWHM = 0.5 %

    Difference Max in the homogeneity region = 2 %

  • Isodoses Comparison (qualitative comparison)

    Dose level at 80% and 60 % of the maximum

    Red: radiochromic film

    Blue: GEANT4

  • Isodoses Comparison (a more quantitative approach)

    Difference of the areas for differtent isodose levels between GEANT4 and Experimental Data

    Collimator Diameter = 20 mm

    Collimator Diameter = 25 mm

    Difference below 5 %

    Difference below 8 %

  • Future developments

    Simulation of the Modulator Wheel to Obtain the Therapeutical Spread OutBragg Peak

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Depth in water [mm]

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    Dep

    th D

    ose

    Dis

    trib

    utio

    n

    tumour

    (Work in progress)

  • Future developments

    Insertion of DICOM images (i.e. Like those from a Computed Tomography Examination)

    More realistic doses distribuition

    Development of new statistical toolsfor ISODOSES COMPARISON between experimental data and fromTPS data

    Transfer of the application to the GRID

    Velocity comparable but quality superior respect with the conventional (analytical based) treatment planning systems actually in use

  • Future developments

    The application will be inserted soon(we hope in the first release of 2004) in the publicdistribution of the GEANT4 tool as advanced example

    We imagine our application can be used from other users for the design and development of new hadron-therapy facility and for the test of the treatment planning systems

  • Thank you

    Maria Grazia Pia

    and

    Susanna Guatelli

    INFN Section of Genova (Italy)

    For their scientific help and practical support they give me during the period I spent at CERN

    in the study of GEANT4 code