harcourt brown & carey nga state clean energy financing presentation
DESCRIPTION
State Financing Options for Clean Energy presentation given in April 2011 to NGA by Matthew H. Brown of Harcourt Brown & Carey.TRANSCRIPT
STATE FINANCING OPTIONS FOR CLEAN ENERGYMatthew H. Brown www.harcourtbrown.com
Harcourt Brown & Carey: Energy & Finance
Consulting and financial advisory firm with a specialty in clean energy financing & related energy policy.
Published numerous papers on clean energy finance.
Clean energy finance clients include states, utilities, lenders, federal agencies, national and regional associations and advocacy organizations.
The Challenge
To stimulate economic growth To improve the quality of buildings in
which we work and live To reduce the amount we spend on
imported energy. And to put people back to work through
investments in the above. But States have very limited resources to meet this challenge.
The Solution
Energy efficiency investments paid for by leveraging public money with private capital.
Some Tools Low-cost capital sources Leverage of public capital through credit
enhancements Utility on-bill financing structures
Presentation Outline
Brief review of typical financing structures and elements
Examples of financing tools Capital sources including low cost capital
sources -- QECBs Leveraging strategies Utility on-bill structures
To Begin: Pros and Cons of Finance as a Policy Mechanism
Strengths WeaknessesAllows leverage of public or utility ratepayer funds and increases access to attract private capital
Not all entities have access to finance because of credit quality
Provides for “skin in the game” from borrowers
Even entities who may have access to finance may not want to take on new debt
Sustainability: Extends the life of limited government/utility ratepayer funds and may remove need for rebates in long run
Cost, time and labor intensive to originate, service loans
Can complement rebate programs Requires careful design to price risk and figure out who bears credit risks
Allows the private market to assess and price risk.
Who Lends?• State - Energy Office
- Finance Authority
• Utility• Finance company • Bank• Credit Union• CDFI
Capital Sources•Banks•Credit Unions•CDFIs•Bonding•Federal•Other (Treasury)•Utilities
Lend
Repay•On Bill•Property Tax•Other Fee•3rd Party
Enhance•Loss Reserve•Debt Service Reserve•Loan Insurance•Sub Loans
Security•Tax lien•Fixture lien•At the meter•Unsecured
Sources:•Federal•Foundations•Utilities
CAPITAL
3 Types of Capital
Traditional
Low-CostSpecialty
Capital source determines: cost of funds, term of financing, underwriting. Determined by credit quality.
Capital
Traditional capital sources are most plentiful and provides the bulk of capital for lending. Might be structured as the senior tranche of
funding in a junior/senior financing structure.
Strategic Use of Specialty Capital
Specialized capital sources include Grant funds (grants, DOE stimulus funds, utility
ratepayer funds, foundation funds) Requires partnership with CDFIs, utilities. Some specialized capital sources can be used
to:o 1. make loans in a junior position to senior capital o make loans to below-typical credit quality borrowers.o 2. make loans for extended periods (eg. 15+ years
in residential programs)o 3. provide financing where the obligation to pay
stays with the meter
Low Cost Capital: QECB Overview Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds: QECBs represent
some of the lowest cost financing options available today
QECBs reduce the issuer’s borrowing costs by a direct subsidy from the U.S. Treasury (currently approximately 3.8%) leading to issuer costs starting at 1.5%
This level of subsidy is far greater than the current taxable/tax exempt spread
QECB allocations of $3.2 billion to the states with sub-allocations to municipalities based on population greater than 100,000
QECB Overview
In addition to formula allocations, municipalities can subsequently seek to gain allocation that has been waived by other municipalities or states can issue out of state “holdback”
Projects financed with QECBs must comply with Qualified Energy Conservation Purpose: Energy efficiency, renewable energy generation and
green community programs Public sector projects in Colorado, private sector under
development HB&C is working with Abundant Power to help state
and local governments with QECB-based programs.
LEVERAGE
Leverage using public or utility capital sources
Credit enhancements Money that a government or utility sets aside to cover
potential losses that a lender might incur, up to some maximum amount.
If losses are less than the amount of the credit enhancement then the utility gets its funds back or the funds can be used to support additional lending.
If losses are greater than the size of the credit enhancement, the lender bears the loss.
Ratepayers/shareholders funds are leveraged by a multiplier (5% reserve = 20x leverage) while capping the amount of ratepayer/shareholder exposure.
Leverage Public Capital
Utility or government provides funds to cover loan defaults up to a certain level. Typical levels for residential lending are 5%-
20%, depending on credit quality. In exchange, lender offers a reduced
interest rate, longer loan term or broader access to capital (relaxed underwriting standards).
Pennsylvania: 3rd Party Lender
Leverage: Loan loss reserve of 5% Typical loans are from $5,000-$7,000
over a 4-5 year term. Originally capitalized with $20 million +
from State Treasurer. >$50 million loans made since 2006. Typical credit is >700 FICO. Allowable
down to 640 FICO
Pennsylvania: 3rd Party Lender
Among most successful ee financing: simple and effective with an innovative capital source.
Keystone HELP offers unsecured personal loans at rates ranging from 4.99%-6.99%. 4.99% for whole-house, audited measures. 5.99% for advanced measures. 6.99% for straight-up ENERGY STAR® measures
Administered by a 3rd party lender that specializes in energy lending.
Delivered through a certified contractor network& 1-800 number.
Michigan Saves: Residential
Leverage: $60 million loan facility based on $3 million loan loss reserve .
7% rate to borrower. 10 year max loan term – being raised to
longer term. 640 and a higher FICO score required
(about 50% of MI population qualifies). Marketed through a contractor network.
UTILITY-BASED FINANCING STRUCTURES
On Bill Finance (utility
bill/utility capital)
On Bill Invoice
(utility bill)
3rd Party Bill (Utility Capital)
3rd Party Bill (Utility Credit
Enhanced)
The Spectrum of Utility-Based EE Financing
Move to the right and the utility role diminishes while non-utility role increases.
“Utility” could be shareholder or ratepayer funds.
Utility Invoicing-Only
Utility Invoicing Set up so that utility does not provide capital, but
only bills on behalf of a 3rd party lender. Since the utility is not the creditor, it should avoid
regulation under TILA. One variant is to have two EFT payments (one for
lender and one for utility bill). Under consideration in Indianapolis (IPL).
3rd Party Billing w/Utility Capital Not aware of any such programs in operation.
Mass HEAT Loan Program
Utilities cover defaults on loans (but do not originate or service loans).
Participating banks offer a 5% loan with a minimum FICO score of 650.
Loan terms up to 24 months for small loans (up to $2,000).
Terms go to 7 years for loans up to $15,000. Loan products for large residential and large C&I
under development. Negotiations conducted directly with the Mass
Bankers Association.
Illinois Utilities
Legislation required utilities to develop efficiency financing programs -- $2.5 million each utility for a statewide total of $12.5 million.
Utility ratepayers would cover 100% of defaults.
A 3rd party entity conducts all loan origination and servicing. Loan terms TBD. Contract awarded but not public.
Our firm working to develop capital source.
A Focus on Commercial Lending
Attractive because of larger project sizes and much better paybacks on energy efficiency investments.
Credit is more difficult to evaluate than residential.
Ownership structures are often complex. Loan sizes are often odd (too small for
most lending).
Commercial Program Model (Metrus)
Metrus
Engineering Firm
Bank
Special Purpose Entity
(Established by
Metrus for customer)
Customer/Host
(Seeking Energy Efficient Solutions
and Equipme
nt)
$ (Debt)
$ (Equity) $ (Service Charge)
$ (Fee for Service)
Provides Initial System Audit and Performance Guarantee on system upgrades
Customer takes on no additional debt and instead pays a monthly service charge.
Conclusions
Many sources of funds can be used to provide leverage to attract private capital.
Capital sources and combinations of capital sources are the key to successful financing.
Finance programs need to be designed to put different parties and different kinds of capital in their proper roles.
Conclusions
Financing programs can work, if they are streamlined and marketed not just as financing but as a means to better equipment, more energy savings.
Financing is necessary but not sufficient to meeting energy policy goals.
3rd Party Lender Origination/Servicing
Recruit lenders to do loan origination and loan servicing.
Use flexible capital to credit-enhance: Attract private lender capital by covering a
portion of losses (risk). Convince lenders to reduce their interest
rate Convince lenders to extend loan terms Convince lenders to loan to a broader
spectrum of the population (riskier loans).