Harmonic Effects in Electrical Distribution Networks due to EV

Charging

Lauri Kütt, Aalto University School of Electrical Engineering (Finland)

1

14PESGM2765

Introduction

• EVs and PHEVs: usage would follow present commuting patterns

• Traffic surveys provide the input data:

Finland: Henkilöliikennetutkimus 2010–2011

UK: National Travel Survey: 2012

US: 2009 National Household Travel Survey

2

3

Trip start time

Extended Range Electric Vehicle Driving and Charging Behavior Observed Early in the EV Project. SAE International 2013

Charging modes

Energy likely charged: 3 kWh or higher

Slow charging for households – capability already available; 2 … 3 kW; long charging times (up to 10 ... 12 hours)

Fast chargers for service stations – charging time low but high installation cost

Within this discussion, only the aspects of household slow charging are presented

4

Slow charging layout

5

Charger converter topology

http://www.ti.com/solution/ev_hev_charger_level_1_2

http://www.ti.com/solution/ev_hev_charger_level_1_2

Standard requirements for chargers

Slow charging is generally using 10 … 16 A

ISO 61000–3–2 : Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 3-2: Limits - Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current ≤ 16 A per phase)

7

Examples: waveform measurement

8

Volt

age

[V]

Curr

ent

[A]

Time (s)

Examples: harmonic levels

9

Har-monic order

Har-monic freq-

uency

EV1: THDi = 4.0%

EV2: THDi = 12.2%

EV3: THDi = 3.3%

EV4: THDi = 10.4%

Magni-tude

Phase Magni-

tude Phase

Magni-tude

Phase Magni-

tude Phase

Hz A deg A deg A deg A deg

Main 50 9.69 -6 10.2 -13 12.7 -1 10.2 -6

3 150 0.32 8 1.23 107 0.27 -156 0.90 156

5 250 0.077 -25 0.036 117 0.18 149 0.40 178

7 350 0.077 -77 0.042 -163 0.118 -55 0.32 -109

9 450 0.030 34 0.060 121 0.053 -33 0.119 -100

11 550 0.088 82 0.115 160 0.039 110 0.092 159

IEC61000-3-2 limits:

3rd: 2.30 A; 5th: 1.14 A;

7th: 0.77 A; 9th: 0.40 A; 11th: 0.33 A

Charging load effects estimation

• Charging profiles of vehicles

– Expected levels of harmonics for different state of charge (SOC) levels

• Daily activity profiles of vehicle user

– Start of charge timing

– Daily energy used for commuting

• Present state of networks load harmonics profiles (with added expected future loads)

10

Vehicles’ charging profiles

11

Ch

arg

ing c

urr

ent

RM

S [

A]

EV battery state of charge, %

Vehicle user activity data

• Derived from traffic surveys, Monte Carlo based stochastic estimations

• Simplification -> user will charge always when connected

• Not-so-smart charging assumed –> no load shifting, charge always when capable

• Weekdays would be the most intense for same-time vehicle charging

12

Vehicles charging at the same time

• 40 vehicles in the area

13

Nu

mb

er

of

veh

icle

s ch

argi

ng

at t

he

sam

e ti

me

Time of day / hr

90 percentile level

Median load

Minimum load

Harmonics daily patterns

• Measured from existing LV network

• Total load of 115 customers

• No DG, no capacitor banks

• Seasonal variance monitored

14

Example from real network #1

• 3rd harmonic RMS and phase

15

Example from real network #2

• 5th harmonic RMS and phase

16

Harmonic cancellation

17

Harmonic cancellation patterns #1

• 3rd harmonic

18

Lev

el o

f h

arm

onic

can

cell

atio

n

Number of vehicles charging at the same time

Harmonic cancellation patterns #2

• 5th harmonic

19

Lev

el o

f h

arm

onic

can

cell

atio

n

Number of vehicles charging at the same time

Example: daily harmonics of DN #1

• 3rd harmonic

• EV charing is added

20

Example: daily harmonics of DN #2

• 5th harmonic

• EV charing is added

21

Conclusions

• EV chargers are rather AC-network friendly and more friendly than small-power loads

• The most significant harmonics have low levels, well below the standard requirements

22