have we seen local parity violation at rhic?
DESCRIPTION
Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?. Introduction What the present data tell us Alternative observable. Based on: Adam Bzdak, VK and Jinfeng Liao, PRC81 031901(R) (2010), [arXiv:0912.5050] J. Liao, VK, and Adam Bzdak, in preparation. CPT is in good shape. C. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
1
Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?
● Introduction● What the present data tell us● Alternative observable
Based on: Adam Bzdak, VK and Jinfeng Liao, PRC81 031901(R) (2010), [arXiv:0912.5050] J. Liao, VK, and Adam Bzdak, in preparation
![Page 2: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
2
CPT is in good shape
C
P
T
onjecture
ress Release
hink
![Page 3: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
3
J. Liao, BNL workshop, April 2010
![Page 4: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
4
The basic observable
X (in-plane)
Y (out-of-plane) Py (out-of-plane)
Charge Separation orElectric Dipole in Pt Space(along out-of-plane direction)
Complications:• hard to identify direction of magnetic field (reaction plane)P. E-by-E• Direction of dipole either parallel OR anti-parallel to magnetic field
Px (in-plane)
Momentum space
Coordinate space
Bcurrent
→ only variance of parity-odd operator can be observed
![Page 5: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
5
The STAR measurement(which everybody discusses)
![Page 6: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
6
The STAR measurement(a closer look)
Py(out-of-plane)
Px(in-plane)
+
Concentrate on same sign pairs for the moment
+
Set
Py(out-of-plane)
Px(in-plane)
++
for both configurations
How to distinguish?
![Page 7: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
7
The STAR measurement(which not so many discuss)
Py(out-of-plane)
Px(in-plane)
++
Py(out-of-plane)
Px(in-plane)
++
Data favor in-plane back-to-back correlation
Add to the mix
same sign
opp. sign.
![Page 8: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
8J. Liao
![Page 9: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
9
The bottom line
![Page 10: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
10
Using simple math
STAR measures for same sign pairs in Au+Au:
Therefore:
No out-of-plane correlation for same charge pairs
Opposite charge:
in-plane
in-plane
out-of-plane
out-of-plane
Same Charge
opp. Charge
![Page 11: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
11
Saving the chiral magnetic effect...
![Page 12: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
12
The argument in the STAR papers:Bout, Bin = Background (in and out of plane)P = Parity violating signal
Thus:
The data show
Thus existence of CME would require:
●“Juuuuust right scenario” a.k.a fine tuning !!!●We need to understand the background●We need differential information on
![Page 13: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
13
Do we understand the background
NO!
![Page 14: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
14
How realistic is the assumption ?
Two particle density:
Prominent example: HBT with respect to the reaction plane
Implies: “background” correlations are independent of reaction plane
Reaction plane dependence always enters via v2 !Pt – and eta dependence of v2 needs to be taken into account
Sources discussed in context of CME: Clusters (STAR, F. Wang), Resonances (STAR), .Anomaly (Asakawa et al)...
![Page 15: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
15
Pt-dependence
Correlated pairs areonly moderately harder thanthermal pairs
![Page 16: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
16
Alternative observable
Quadrupolemoment
Reaction planeangle Charged dipole
momentCharged dipoleangle
![Page 17: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
17
Extract dipole moment and angle
![Page 18: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
18J. Liao
![Page 19: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
19J. Liao
![Page 20: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
20
Correlations can lead to similar dipole angel; but reduce magnitude
![Page 21: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
21
SummaryPy(out-of-plane)
Px(in-plane)
++
● Data favor in-plane back-to-back correlation for same charge– CME predicts out of plane
● Presence of CME requires fine-tunining: Background = - CME ?
● Need differential information on– Be aware that pt- and eta
dependencemay be differernt● Alternative observable: measure
charge dipole (orientation and magnitude)
● How about proton-proton????
![Page 22: Have we seen Local Parity Violation at RHIC?](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062410/56815ed1550346895dcd5f4a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
/home/vkoch/Desktop/INT2010/parity_talk.odp
22
Conclusion
NO definitive evidence for local parity violation!
Yet !?