hazard management effectiveness & measurement - · pdf filehazard management effectiveness...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Hazard Management Effectiveness & Measurement
Drillsafe MeetingPerth 25th March, 2004Paul Young
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Hazard Management
• Variety of Hazard Management Tools• A Means to Measure• Assessment and Continuous improvement• Knowledge Sharing Ability
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Schlumberger Hazard Analysis Tools
Tas
k
I
NC
RE
AS
ING
CO
MP
LE
XIT
Y
P
roce
ss
QRA
PRIAM HAZID/HAZOP
HARC Record Form (Design & Planning)
HARC Record Form (Worksite Operations)
JSA (QHSE) Form
THA Prompt Card
Stand Back 5x5
STOP, Commentary Drive SIPP Observation, Unsafe Act Audit
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Measuring Effectiveness
• Statistics– Trend Analysis– Performance Against Objectives (Score Cards)
• Participation– Reporting Rates– Passport
• Audits and Assessments– Scores– Remedial Action Closure.
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Measuring Effectiveness
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Measuring Effectiveness
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Hazard Management – Risk Profile
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Measuring Effectiveness -Scorecards
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Measuring Effectiveness
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Participation – Passport Review
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Continuous Improvement
• Accountability• Behavioural Observations• Evolution of the HARC• Knowledge Management.
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
JSA – Instilling Accountability
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Behavioural Observations
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
FOCUS AREA
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Evolution of the HARC
• Hazard Analysis & Risk Control– Refining the JSA to ensure ALARP before
proceeding– A Hazard Management Tool for tasks of
significant risk.
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
HARC Workflow
Assess Likelihood of each undesired event
Assess Potential Severity of each undesired event
Place analyses on OFS Risk Assessment Matrix.
Is it acceptable?
Risk reduction with improved Prevention
Risk reduction with improved Mitigation
Document in HARC form, agree review cycle,
proceed
No
Yes
Identify all hazards associated with planned
activities
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
HARC
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Risk Assessment
SE
VE
RIT
Y
-11L
-21S
-41C
-31M
-51 M C
-22L
-41S
-62M
-82C
-102MC
-33L
-63S
-93M
-123C
-153MC
-44L
-55L
-84S
-124M
-164C
-204MC
-105S
-155M
-205C
-255 M C
-1Light
-2
-3
-4
-5
Serious
Major
Catastrophic
Multi-Catastrophic
321
Possible
Unlikely
Improbable
5
Probable
4
Likely
LIKELIHOOD
White arrow indicates decreasing r isk
R E D
BLUE
YELLOW
GREEN
INTOLERABLE: Do not take this r isk
UNDESIRABLE: Demonstrate ALARP before proceeding
ACCEPTABLE: Proceed careful ly, with continuous improvement
NEGLIGIBLE: Safe to proceed
-16 to -10
-9 to -5
-4 to -2
-1
BLACK NON-OPERABLE: Evacuate the zone and or area/country-25 to -20
Negligible Safe to proceed
Acceptable Proceed carefully, with continuous improvement
Undesirable Demonstrate ALARP before proceedingIntolerable Do not take this RiskBlack Zone Non-Operable
Negligible Safe to proceed
Acceptable Proceed carefully, with continuous improvement
Undesirable Demonstrate ALARP before proceedingIntolerable Do not take this RiskBlack Zone Non-Operable
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Knowledge Management
• All HSE documentation controlled centrally• HARCS, Hazards & Alerts stored centrally• Employee Subscriptions to Knowledge
databases• Automatic email notification of alerts &
changes
Sch
lum
berg
er Private
Summary
•Successful Hazard Management depends on• having the right tools for the complexity and risk involved• a method to measure and assess effectiveness• continuous assessment improvement• an effective way to share identified hazards with all employees