he response of women from poor landless …
TRANSCRIPT
THE RESPONSE OF WOMEN FROM POOR LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS TO THE IMPACTS OF
RECURRING NATURAL HAZARDS
A study of coping strategies in northern Bangladesh.
Wageningen University
Wageningen, The Netherlands, December 2013
Master Programme: International Development Studies
Specialisation: Disaster Studies
Thesis Code: RDS-80733
Nienke Bilo
850128 068140
Supervisors:
Dr. J.F. Warner - Disaster Studies
Dr. E.D. Rasch - Rural Development Sociology
i
Abstract
This thesis looks into the perception of and the response to natural hazards of women from poor
landless households in northern Bangladesh. Based on social theory on disaster, the impact of
hazards is assumed to be a social construction in which the characteristics of people, their
vulnerabilities and capacities, play a major role. Hazard response is based on their livelihoods and
access to resources, and coping is an ongoing process of actions taken before, during and after a
hazard. At two locations in northern Bangladesh individual interviews with these women have been
conducted about their lives, the hazards they face, how they respond to these hazards and the
support they get either from the Government of Bangladesh, (i)NGOs or community members. The
results show most of them live a hand-to-mouth existence based on insecure incomes and struggle
frequently with excessive rain, flooding and storms. Their response focusses on the well-being of the
family, on arranging food and safety. They lack resources and access to take any structural protection
measures, either in advance or after a hazard. People’s fragile livelihoods are at the core of their
susceptibility to harm and lack of capacity to cope and support each other. Structural outside
assistance is lacking and the loans available give only temporarily relief and year-long burden. On the
long-term many of the chosen and available coping strategies are likely to undermine rather than
strengthen them in their battle against the hazards they face.
Keywords: natural hazards, vulnerability, livelihoods, response capacity, coping strategies,
Bangladesh, poor women.
iii
Acknowledgements
Even now this thesis has been finished, there are numerous points left open for discussion. The last
words I write however will not address these, but express my thanks to the many people who have
supported and helped me to reach this point. First of all I want to thank my supervisors Jeroen
Warner and Elisabet Rasch from Wageningen University who have started this process with me over
a year ago and never stopped supporting me. They gave me useful advice and feedback to prepare,
execute and finally finish my research. Special thanks also to Judith de Bruijne of the FLUID
foundation, who arranged this opportunity to do my thesis research in Bangladesh. I thank Anowar
Kamal, the director of UST, for his hospitality and support, just as I want to thank all UST’s employees
who gave me their friendship, shared their knowledge and supported me. Thanks also to my
translators, Hera, Mushfiq and especially Moznu. Thank you all for making my research possible!
Then, to all whom I see as my biggest fans and supporters, my thanks! I am happy I can say you were
right in believing in me and I am grateful to know you all! Thank you mom and dad for all the
support, even at a distance of 1000s of kilometres, in my happiness, victories and disappointments.
Daddy, specially to you, for also reading my thesis and giving me feedback! Thank you brothers and
family for support, calls, e-mails, advice and surprise post packages! Thanks also to my friends and
supporters Sascha, Ruward, Hilde and Leo, who helped me put things in perspective and think
pragmatically, or simply forget my doubts with a chat and tea or some other drink. You all kept me
happy and going! Just as you did Mireille and Hein, when we were in Bangladesh and sharing this
experience, the joy, funny things and frustrations.
Last but not least I want to express my gratitude to the women whom shared their stories with me.
Your stories are the heart of this thesis and talking to you all made my stay in Bangladesh one to
never forget. I could not help you, but I hope this thesis does right to what you told me. Dhan'yabād!
Thank you so much! Your stories can be read here. To all who read it: enjoy reading it, but realise this
is not my story, but my interpretation of stories shared with me by women living the reality of it.
Nienke Bilo
Wageningen, December 2013
v
Table of contents
Abstract i
Acknowledgements iii
Table of contents v
List of abbreviations vii
List of Bangla words vii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Problem statement 2
1.2. Structure of thesis 3
2. THEORETICAL / CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 5
2.1. Hazards, disaster (risk) and local impact. 5
2.2. Vulnerability. 6
2.3. Capacity. 9
2.4. Outside assistance. 10
2.5. People’s response to hazards: a reflection on the theory. 13
3. METHODOLOGY 14
3.1. Data collection. 14
3.2. Data analysis. 16
3.3. Discussion and limitations. 16
4. THE BENGAL CONTEXT OF HAZARDS AND RESPONSE 18
4.1. Natural hazards, disasters, impacts and response in Bangladesh. 18
4.2. A description of the research locations. 21
5. DAILY life 25
5.1. Life in the rural areas surrounding Kochukata and Tangomari Hat. 25
5.2. Life in Toikorerpara and Uttar Toikorerpara. 29
5.3. A reflection on livelihoods and occurring hazards. 32
6. LIFE DURING RAIN AND STORMS 34
6.1. Life during moderate floods. 34
6.2. Life during floods of higher level and longer duration. 35
6.3. Daily life interfered by storm, thunder and hail. 37
6.4. A reflection on life during hazards. 38
vi
7. UNFOLDING IMPACTS 39
7.1. Human lives and safety 39
7.2. Damage to houses and belongings 40
7.3. Income and food security. 41
7.4. Poultry, livestock, crops, vegetables and fruit trees. 42
7.5. A reflection on unfolding impacts of floods and storms on life and livelihoods. 42
8. LIFE AFTER THE RAINY SEASON AND STORMS 43
8.1. Picking up life after individual floods and the whole rainy seasons. 43
8.2. Picking up life after storms. 44
8.3. A reflection on the impact of hazards on life after their occurrence. 45
9. SOCIAL PROTECTION AND WOMEN’S NEEDS AND WANTS 47
9.1. Government support. 47
9.2. Projects by NGOs. 48
9.3. Loans and private borrowings. 49
9.4. Women’s identified needs and expressed wants. 50
9.5. Reflection on the support women get, need and want. 51
10. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 52
10.1. Women’s response to floods and storms. 52
10.2. Some notes on local coping in Bangladesh. 53
10.3. Conclusion. 56
REFERENCES 59
APPENDIX 65
vii
List of abbreviations
ASA Association for Social Advancement (NGO)
BRAC Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (NGO) (although no longer used as abbr.)
CDMP Comprhensive Disaster Management Programme
DM Disaster Management
DRR Disaster Risk Reduction
FSUP Food Security for Ultra Poor Women
GO Government Organisation
GoB Government of Bangladesh
(i)NGO (international) Non-Governmental Organisation
PAR model Pressure and Release model
RDRS Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Service (NGO)
SHARP Self-Help and Rehabilitation Program (NGO)
UDMC Union Disaster Management Committee
UP Union Parishad (local administrative unit of the government)
UST Unnayan Shahojogy Team (NGO)
List of Bangla words
Adi (loan) system following the principle of taking care of other people’s land or animals
for half of its returns (see for further explanation chapter 5.1).
Alop tula portable stove
Bhat heightened road serving as protection against high water
Bura raft made from banana trees, used for transport in times of floods
Char sandbanks and new islands in and alongside rivers emerging after floods, often very
fertile, offering great income opportunities and posing great risks during monsoon
Dahl preparation of lentils often eaten with rice.
Doka name used in (uttar) Toikorerpara for bamboo beams used as emergency braces to
strut houses during storms
Kif a place under the roof of houses, where people can put their belongings
Monga term used to describe a nearfamine like situation, and seasonal food shortages in
northern districts of Bangladesh
Monsoon rainy season, during Bangla months Ashaŗhô and Shrabôn (half June - half August)
Mst. Mosammat, Islamic name and first name of many women.
Tea hostel tea houses, like cafes, serving tea, a snack, lunch and diner
Teckna name used in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara for bamboo beams used as
emergency braces to strut houses during storms
Toki heightened table used to cook on in times of floods
Tula stove
1
1. INTRODUCTION
“Ten or twenty years ago I did not need to move from here, but recently I move frequently, because
the floods come here frequently. It is not possible to stay here, that is why I move. The water is
moving our land. The river comes in here. Ten years ago the situation was different. […] Flood is
harmful for the poor people only. It is very harmful and it is not possible to face frequent floods every
year. So it is getting worse day by day. Previous, people were not used to begging but because of the
moving of land people are getting used to begging. They expect help from others. In previous times
that was not there.”
(Mst. Momena Katum, 50 years, widow, living with her in-laws in Uttar Toikorerpara, Bangladesh)
In Bangladesh, people face recurring and increasing problems with extreme weather events like
floods during the rainy season. Their situation, like Momena’s, reflect the global trend in natural
hazards and disasters. International data on the occurrence of disasters show a trend of increasing
numbers of natural disasters each year, and also the numbers of people affected by and the
economic costs become higher and higher. Despite these numbers, the reported number of people
killed however is steadily decreasing (EM-DAT, 2012a). Natural hazards, such as storms, floods,
droughts and earthquakes don’t seem as deadly as before, but still they can cause great set-back to
development. In economic terms damage sometimes equals the sum of development aid a country
receives or money it borrows in the course of several years. Disasters can thus cause a permanent
loss of development momentum (World Bank, 2006). Moreover the poor tend to be more vulnerable
to disaster (DFID, 2005; Schmidt & Bloemertz, 2006). Like Momena says, they cannot face frequent
hazards and even turn to begging to cope. Many however do face the hazards, and this thesis looks
at how women from poor landless households in northern Bangladesh do that, how they perceive
the hazards they face and how they cope, either with or without support.
Since the late 1990s the discussion around climate change and its supposed effects on the
occurrence of natural hazards and disasters has brought the issue of mainstreaming disaster
management (DM) in development projects in the spotlights of (inter)national and multilateral
institutions and agreements (Birkmann & Teichman, 2010). Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is even
formally mainstreamed in the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015, as ‘more effective integration
of disaster risk’ has become the first of its three strategic goals (Benson & Twigg, 2007). Despite all
these policy measures, practice is still lagging behind (Juneja, 2008). It proves hard to reduce
people’s vulnerability to natural hazards, through development and DRR. Many things have to be
considered and there isn’t one solution that fits everywhere (Cannon, Twigg & Rowell, 2003). The
local context is important and therefore also the participation of local communities (Gaillard, 2010).
Their knowledge and practices tend to be locally and socially appropriate, and give insight in the local
perspectives and priorities. Including people and their knowledge in the process of assisting them
empowers them and increases the chance of successful protection (Mallick, Rahman, Alam, et al.,
2005).
About local knowledge and response in Bangladesh most is known about people in coastal areas
facing cyclones, and people living on frequently flooded chars (which are islands) in the middle of
one of the country’s main rivers. Research shows the impacts of hazards are location specific and
2
damage is unequally distributed. Moreover the ability to cope varies and depends, among other
things, on people’s socio-economic conditions, living location, education, awareness of risk and
occupation (Paul & Routray, 2010). Outside assistance available also influences their coping, but
indigenous knowledge, social ties and safety nets are found most important in the coping of
Bangladeshis (Alam & Collins, 2010; Masud-All-Kamal, 2013; Paul & Routray, 2010, 2011; Sultana &
Rayhan, 2012).
1.1. Problem statement
Local communities are the first line of defence in case of natural hazards and people with a history of
facing natural hazards develop their own ways of coping (Gaillard, 2010). Their knowledge and
practices are crucial in dealing with the impact of natural hazards and disasters, as they tend to be
adjusted to the context (Mallick et al., 2005). Nevertheless much damage is done, many people are
affected, and their practices thus seem to fall short in countering the negative impacts of natural
hazards. Reducing people’s vulnerability through outside assistance proves difficult and complex.
Efficient alignment and mutual reinforcement of local knowledge and coping strategies and outside
assistance is crucial for effective hazard response. Bangladesh is a country with a high poverty rate
(UNDP, 2013), and high numbers of natural hazards and people affected each year (EM-DAT, 2012b;
PreventionWeb, 2012), and the numbers suggest the country and its people would profit much from
effective hazard response. Insight in people’s response and how they view outside assistance is
needed to achieve this and align outside assistance and local coping.
This research focusses on the lives of women from poor landless households in Northern Bangladesh
and their stories about natural hazards and disasters, response and outside assistance. Little is
known about the dynamics between their lives, recurring natural hazards, impact, response and
outside assistance. Most research on local coping and response to hazards in Bangladesh focusses on
major nationwide disasters, or disaster-prone areas such as coastal areas, river plains and ‘chars’1.
Moreover women are often underrepresented in research on local coping strategies in Bangladesh
(14,6%; 10% in resp. Brouwer et al., 2007; Paul & Routray, 2011), while some findings suggest they
tend to be the ones doing most of the (construction) work to protect their family and assets in case
of disaster (Lein, 2009). Focusing on the perspective of women in northern Bangladesh can therefore
shed new light on household coping strategies. Including outside assistance can furthermore provide
new insights in the relation between local coping strategies and activities from the Government of
Bangladesh (GoB) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and give new input to the
discussion on efficient alignment.
Research aim, main question and sub-questions
Bangladesh is a country with many poor people affected by natural hazards and in need of support.
Based on the believe efficient alignment and mutual reinforcement of local knowledge and coping
strategies and outside assistance is needed for effective hazard response, this research aims for
1 Chars are sandbanks and new islands in and alongside the river emerging after floods. Chars are often very
fertile and offer people great income opportunities. During the monsoon however these chars easily flood.
3
insight in local experience of hazard impact, response and outside assistance in Bangladesh. This
knowledge is seen as a pre-condition to reach alignment. Although much is known already, there are
also gaps concerning poor households in northern Bangladesh and the experience and knowledge of
women. This has led to the following question guiding this research: How do women from poor
landless households in Nilphamari and Gaibandha district, Bangladesh, perceive and respond to
recurring natural hazards affecting their lives, and the outside assistance they receive?
Following the main question, and guiding the search for an answer, are five sub-questions.
1) What does the daily life of the women look like?
2) In what ways do natural hazards affect the lives of the women?
3) How do the women perceive the recurring natural hazards and its effects?
4) How do the women respond to and cope with hazard risks and impacts?
5) How do the women perceive the available and unavailable support for disaster response
from government and (i)NGOs?
These questions are formulated from an actor-oriented perspective. The emphasis is on people
rather than structures, because they themselves, their lives and livelihoods are at the base of their
vulnerability to hazard impacts and their capacity to respond and adapt. The next chapter discussing
the theoretical framework of this research, will elaborate more on this relation between people’s
lives, vulnerability and capacity.
1.2. Structure of thesis
In order to give a clear insight in the way poor women in rural Northern Bangladesh perceive the
natural hazards they face and how they respond, this thesis will take you from theory to practice and
back again. Chapter 2 discusses the theory on which this research is built. It explains how the impact
of natural hazards is a social construction resulting from a hazard meeting a society, community or
household with certain characteristics influencing their vulnerability and capacity. Large-scale
processes in society, but also people’s livelihoods play a major role in their susceptibility to harm and
capacity to counter threats and negative impacts. External and internal factors play a role in how
people make a living in normal times and are able to continue their way of living in hazardous times.
The access to resources needed and thus household’s relationships turn out to be crucial.
In chapter 3 the main question to guide the research has been formulated: How do women from poor
landless households in northern Bangladesh, perceive and respond to the recurring natural hazards
they face and the outside assistance they receive? To answer this question and reach the above set
research aims an actor-oriented approach, and individual interviews with women from poor landless
households have been chosen. The research is set in northern Bangladesh and the research context is
described more detailed in chapter 4. In general the Bengal context reflects much of the above
discussed global trends in occurrence and response. Although indigenous knowledge, social ties and
safety nets are most important in people’s response, the poor remain most vulnerable. At the
research locations, there are high poverty rates and a relation between hazard impact and poverty
has been found. Little is however known about hazard impacts and local response.
4
In chapter 5 life at the research locations is described as it is told by the women interviewed. The
chapter shows people live from insecure income and depend on fragile livelihoods. Income and food
are everyday challenges and the rainy season, especially floods and storms make these issues even
more problematic. Chapter 6 illustrates this by describing life during floods and storms. Women
almost unanimous state that during these times cannot be worked, there is no income, food cannot
be bought and they can thus not eat or feed their family. With the help of borrowed money and rice
and other strategies, they nevertheless manage to get through. However, as becomes clear in
chapter 7, other problems occur besides income and food, and may last far beyond the occurrence of
flood. The description of life after the flood in chapter 8 shows this increases pressures on the
income of the women and their family, and many have to take refuge to measures undermining their
already fragile livelihoods, either by selling assets, taking a loan or giving in on basic daily needs.
Chapter 9 explains the role of loans and other outside assistance provided to the women and their
family. It turns out no specific attention is given to hazards by either the GoB or NGOs, and loans are
the major outside assistance available to deal with hazard impacts or other problems. Money meets
the need women identify, but loans come with an obligation and many families face serious
difficulties with repaying them.
In chapter 10 the findings of this research are discussed and a conclusion is drawn. Women’s
response to hazards, before, during and after its occurrence, is put together and reflected upon with
the help of the theory and what was already known about local coping in Bangladesh. In short the
findings show that people’s response capacities and strategies, as well as the available support, do
not structurally help the poor deal with the hazards they face. Their response focusses on the well-
being of the family, on arranging food and safety, but resources are lacking to take any structural
measures or change the situation, either in advance or after the hazards occurrence. People’s fragile
livelihoods are at the core of their vulnerability and lack of capacity, and impact as well as coping
strategies undermine rather than strengthen their position in the battle against the hazards they
face.
5
2. THEORETICAL / CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter discusses the theory and concepts framing this research. In order to understand the
response of poor women in Northern Bangladesh to the natural hazards and disasters they face, the
dynamics of hazards and impact are important. The chapter starts with a discussion of natural
hazards and disaster (risk), the use of these concepts in disaster research and how they relate. It
shows the impact of a hazard results from an interplay with people’s vulnerability and capacity to
respond and adapt, and the chapter thus continues with a discussion of these concepts. Finally,
before concluding the chapter with a reflection on the relation between the theory and people’s
response, the effect of outside assistance on hazard impact and people’s vulnerability and capacity
will be addressed.
2.1. Hazards, disaster (risk) and local impact.
To gain insight in the response of poor women in northern Bangladesh it is important to understand
what hazards are and how they can influence their lives. In general natural hazards refer to ‘a natural
events that may affect different places at different times’ (Wisner, Blaikie, Cannon & Davis, 2004:49).
More specifically, they are characterized as ‘potentially harmful’ (Wisner, Gaillard & Kelman, 2012),
and carrying ‘a potential for social, infrastructural, or environmental damage’ (Oliver-Smith &
Hoffman, 2002:4). Natural hazards vary in characteristics and intensity and can lead to situations of
severe damage, but do not equate or automatically lead to disaster (Frerks, Hilhorst, & Moreyra,
1999). The risk on a disaster (R) is the result from a complex interplay between a potentially
damaging hazard (H), and the vulnerability (V) and capacity (C) of a society. A relation commonly
schematized as R = H * V / C (Wisner et al, 2004; 2012; Birkmann, 2006). This means the impact of a
natural hazard on a society, community, household or individual is determined by their
characteristics, by their vulnerability and capacity. A disaster, but actually any impact of hazards, is
thus socially constructed. This will become more clear in the discussion of both vulnerability (V) and
capacity (C) in the following paragraphs of this chapter. Here first a short continuation of the
discussion on disaster and the insight it gives on the impact hazards can have.
In the field of disaster studies there is a lively discussion about what exactly a disaster is and a large
number of definitions exist (Alexander, 1997; Frerks et al., 1999; Wisner et al., 2012). Discussions
concern, among other issues, the distinction between incidents and disasters, the simplicity of
definitions compared to the complexity of events, and which elements to include to define a
situation as a disaster (Alexander, 1997). Especially the distinction between incidents, emergencies
and disaster becomes relevant because formal declarations of disaster have implications for support
and insurances (Wisner et al., 2012). These issues are less relevant for this research however and the
key elements identified in existing definitions by Frerks and his colleagues will be sufficient. They
distinguish key elements, which together describe a natural disaster as:
- “an extreme phenomenon;
- of great intensity and limited endurance;
- occurring at a certain location;
- involving a complex interplay between physical and human systems;
6
- causing loss of lives and threats to public health, as well as physical damage and disruption of
livelihood systems and society;
- outstripping local capacities and resources;
- requiring outside assistance to cope with” (Frerks et al., 1999:7).
These elements can also be found in the definition Wisner and his colleagues formulated, stating a
natural disaster is “a situation involving a natural hazard which has consequences in terms of
damage, livelihoods/economic disruption and/or casualties that are too great for the affected area
and people to deal with properly on their own” (Wisner et al., 2012:30).
Natural hazards have the potential to impact people in different ways, from personal lives and
health, belongings and livelihoods, to economic activities and society functioning in general. This has
been an important guide in the execution and reporting of this research, just as the fact that effects
can be primary and direct, but also secondary effect as a hazard and its impact unfold through time
(Wisner & Adams, 2002). Not all hazards impacting all these aspects of life are considered disasters
or require outside assistance, as the threshold of labelling a situation a disaster is not clear. The
concept nevertheless bears the inherent meaning of extremes and a focus on outcomes, rather than
dynamics and local or even personal impacts. Therefor it is not used any further as a central concept,
but will be focussed on hazard impacts and the important variables at play are. From here on, the use
of hazards will refer to natural events, while hazard impact will refer to the effects these events have
on people’s lives. Whether or not, how, and in what degree a hazard affects people, the hazard
impact is socially constructed and depends on people’s vulnerability and capacity.
2.2. Vulnerability.
Vulnerability plays a key role in the impact of hazards on people’s lives. A hazard will not affect a
population or community negatively or lead to disaster if it’s not vulnerable. Or, in other words, if
people are not susceptible or prone to damage or injury, a hazard will not lead to disaster nor have
negative impacts (Wisner et al., 2004). Although vulnerability is generally referred to as the
susceptibility to suffer damage (Gaillard, 2010), its meaning is subject to discussion. Over 25
definitions can be found in recent literature (Birkmann, 2006), and a shared language and clarity
about where it stands for as a scientific concept is lacking (Birkmann, 2006; Birkmann, Cardona,
Carreño, et al., 2013). The common-sense meaning is however sufficient, and instead of diving into
this theoretical discussion, the focus will be what makes people susceptible for harm. External factors
of influence are discussed first. These concern the ‘complex set of characteristics determined by
wider social, political and economic processes’ (Cannon et al., 2003). The characteristics of people’s
livelihoods addressed secondly are the internal factors, and will put the focus on people rather than
societal structures. As will become clear this links closely to the actor-oriented approach and leads to
people’s capacity to act, which will be discussed in the next paragraph.
External factors and processes generating unsafe conditions.
The Pressure and Release (PAR) model addresses the bigger picture of people’s vulnerability. It
explains how impersonal large-scale and long-term processes can result in unsafe conditions making
people and households susceptible to damage and injury when a hazard occurs. Like a nutcracker
7
causing pressure from opposing sites until the nut cracks, processes in society and hazards from
nature put people at risk (figure 1). Vulnerability is generated by factors and processes originating
quite remote from where hazards impact life. The most distant factors or ‘root causes’ are large-scale
and long-term social, political and economic processes. The local and contemporary manifestations
of, and reactions to these processes, from diseases, urbanisation and regulations, to wars, are called
‘dynamic pressures’. These pressures translate ‘root causes’ into ‘unsafe conditions’ like living in
hazardous locations, unsafe housing, lack of protection by the state and having to engage in
dangerous ways of earning an income. (Wisner et al., 2004).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Pressure and Release Model. Source: Wisner et al., 2004
Unsafe conditions are specific expressions of people’s vulnerability making them susceptible to harm
(Wisner et al., 2004), but they are not the only factor influencing people’s vulnerability. Not only can
large-scale processes lead to unsafe conditions, they also have consequences for the way people
make their living. Globalisation, economic processes of production and exchange, of exploitation and
empowerment lead to both marginalisation of and opportunity for people and affect how they build
their livelihoods (Scoones, 2009). Although the PAR model explains the underlying chain of causation
of vulnerability, it does not giving insight at what happens at the pressure point where a natural
event meets society and interferes with people’s lives. Where the PAR model fails to account for
change in the conditions and vulnerability of people before, during and after the onset of a disaster
(Wisner et al., 2004), a livelihood approach may give insight. Moreover, by being a people-centred
approach (DfID in Scoones, 2009) it can take into account the characteristics of people, which is
according to Cannon and his colleagues essential to understand their vulnerability (Cannon et al.,
2003).
8
Vulnerability at household level.
The progression of vulnerability as described in the PAR model, can be seen as the external side of
vulnerability, the side of the unsafe conditions, risks, stress and shocks or hazards. There is however
also an internal side which concerns the characteristics of the people and households at risk. This
side is according to Chambers (1989) the side of defencelessness, the inability or lack of means to
cope with shocks and hazards. Many however would hesitate or even critique the use of this word as
it depicts people as incapable and approaches them in a negative sense. The lack of means to cope
however, is widely acknowledged as being of influence. According to Gaillard the assets and
resources essential for sustaining a livelihood are crucial in defining vulnerability (Gaillard, 2010).
Together with people’s initial well-being, self- and social protection, and social and political
networks, livelihoods are part of a complex set of characteristics that influence the impact of hazards
and damage on people’s lives (Cannon et al., 2003). Even within households there are dynamics
influencing the impact of hazards on individuals. Neumayer and Plümper (2007) found socio-
economic patterns in everyday live create differential gender-specific vulnerability to hazard impacts,
suggesting a higher vulnerability of women compared to men.
Looking at people’s livelihood and its immediate context will help understand the internal side of
people’s vulnerability. As livelihoods are generally accepted to be about people, their resources and
what they do with these (Ahmed, Quisumbing, Nasreen, Hoddinott & Bryan, 2009), this means
looking at their capabilities, assets (both material and social resources), and activities for a means of
living (Chambers and Conway in Scoones, 2009). A sustainable livelihood implies it is ‘stable, durable,
resilient and robust in the face of both external shocks and internal stresses’ (Scoones, 2009:188).
Assets and resources are essential (Gaillard, 2010), and people’s ability to arrange and use the
resources they need in normal times and in times of hazards and disaster, is a crucial factors in their
susceptibility to harm (Wisner et al., 2004). Access however is not free and unlimited, but depends
on social and economic relations at different levels, from local to national. These relations
encompass flows of goods and allocate resources through their politics shaping and shaped by rights,
obligations and expectations (ibid). Moreover large-scale political and economic processes create
marginalisation, dispossession, accumulation and differentiation influencing the flows of goods
(Scoones, 2009), illustrating the link mentioned before between large-scale processes and people’s
livelihoods.
In normal times households make a living through decision making on how to use the resources
available to them. In this process they can to some extend buy themselves protection against
hazards. They can, for example, strengthen their house, diversify their income and arrange a shelter.
Moreover through relationships household members have as citizens or community members, they
may have access to social protection like hazard precautions and preparedness provided by the state,
other institutions or local collective action. When a natural hazard occurs the social and self-
protection measures may absorb some of the immediate and enfolding impacts, while other impacts
may burst through the ‘layer of protection’ and affect different households in varying degrees. When
the hazard makes life no longer normal, the relations of households, their access to resources,
especially safety, and their capacity to cope and adapt in this situation become very important, as
well as the outside assistance that may come later. Through time occurring impacts and human
response unfold and eventually lead to altered conditions of vulnerability and protections. (Wisner et
9
al., 2004).2 Reaching sustainable livelihoods that are stable, durable, resilient and robust in the face
of stresses like natural hazards, involves access, relations and the capacity to cope and adapt, but
also needs links between the reality and particularities of poor people’s livelihoods and wider
processes involving power and politics (Scoones, 2009).
2.3. Capacity.
The former paragraph shows vulnerability is closely related to capacity, as it is subject to people’s
ability to arrange and use resources. Capacity can be seen as the counterpart of vulnerability and an
autonomous variable, but also as determining factor of vulnerability, and the relation between the
two is subject to discussion. Although there is no consensus about the exact relation, capacity is
commonly understood as a variable countering the negative impacts of a hazard and lowering the
risk on disaster. This paragraph will discuss capacity from an actor-oriented point of view, starting
with a short discussion of agency before turning to people’s capacity to take protective actions.
Agency and action.
In building a livelihood households depend on the resources available to them. Besides the unsafe
conditions they face, their vulnerability in times of hazard is subject to the degree in which they
manage to access and use the resources they need. They process information, decide, choose,
innovate, experiment, strategize etc, to make the best of the normal and hazardous situations they
face. According to Long (1992), these actions show people’s capacity to respond to life
circumstances. In actor-oriented sociology the capacity to act is often described as human agency
(Emirbayer & Mische, 1998; Campbell, 2009). Although there is no consensus about what agency
exactly is (ibid), a short discussion of some of its basic characteristics does help to understand how
the capacity to act in a situation like that of the women in this research emerges or exists.
Agency is frequently posed as the antipode of structure (Giddens, 1979; Biesta & Tedder, 2006;
Campbell, 2009), and used as a synonym for action (Biesta & Tedder, 2006; Scott & Marshall, 2009),
that according to some, is social-culturally mediated and willed (Campbell, 2009) or intentional
(Connor, 2011). Employing social and economic relations to access resources needed to make a living
or to counter the impacts of a hazard illustrates an important aspect of agency, namely social
engagement (Emirbayer & Mische, 1998). People exist in relation to others, to society and the
situations they encounter, and assign meaning to these (Long, 1992). Agency is the temporally
embedded process in which people are socially engaged, and in which they make decisions based on
the context and what they know, being informed by the past and oriented towards the present and
the future. The (structural) contexts of people’s actions are temporal and change from situation to
situation, affecting their agency (Emirbayer & Mische, 1998). In other words, their capacity to act
depends on the temporal and contextual situation, and on the relations and resources they are able
to employ in that situation.
2 Wisner and his colleagues describe this process of access, impact and trajectory of vulnerability in the access
model, which they describe in the book ‘At Risk’ (see Wisner et al, 2004: chapter 3).
10
The actor-oriented perspective emphasizes people’s agency instead of structure as determining
factor in decision making and acting. Structure however cannot be ignored as people’s agency and
capacity to act is placed in time and space, indicating the importance of the temporal and spatial
context. In case of hazards and the capacity to counter its impacts, the context is made up of the
unsafe conditions and social protection resulting from large and less-large scale economic, political
and social processes, and households’ social relations and position in society. This context influences
people’s capacity to do what is needed to protect themselves and their families from the hazards
they face. It is however not only the socially constructed context of unsafe conditions, social
protection and relations and their characteristics that steer the behaviour of individuals, households
and groups. People’s (religious) beliefs and ideas, and thoughts of fatalism also affect their behaviour
and should be considered in looking at their response to hazards (Cannon, 2008). Although people
have the ability or capacity to take action, for different reasons they may not employ this to change a
situation.
Response and adaptation.
In making a living people can choose to create some self-protection against hazards. When however
a hazard occurs they will have to act upon a changing situation, as unfolding impacts and human
response change both vulnerability, safety and capacity through time (Wisner et al., 2004). Therefor
Birkmann and colleagues distinguish between response capacity including the capacities to
anticipate, cope and recover, and adaptive capacity or the capacity to learn and change existing
practices (Birkmann et al., 2013). Ideally, protection thus is a continuous process, stretching from
well before until well after the actual occurrence of a hazard. A process that can also be seen as
sequential stages of a cycle, including: a) planning, prevention, preparedness and mitigation; b)
emergency response; and, c) recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction for sustainable
development, including lessons learned and new ideas on how to act in stages a, b and c, next time
(Wisner & Adams, 2002).
Response capacities aim to maintain life as known in situations of stress and hazard, and concern the
degree in which households are able to take actions to minimize risk and impact well in advance,
during, and after a hazard. The idea of protection as an on-going cyclical process however is more
than this. It includes a process of learning from a hazard and undertaking actions to deal with it
better next time. A process of changing things to limit the risk of damage and building up life in a
sustainable way (Wisner & Adams, 2002). Adaptation goes even further as according to Birkmann
and colleagues it implies action that aims to change the context creating vulnerability and
constraining human capacity to act (Birkmann et al., 2013). The capacity of people for protective
action or response therefore also includes being able to learn and change their own situation either
at household or even institutional level.
2.4. Outside assistance.
In ‘The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction’, disaster risk is defined by the
factors ‘hazard’, ‘vulnerability’, ‘capacity’, and finally also ‘protective actions carried out by larger
entities’ (Wisner et al., 2012). Protective actions can be set up by the government but also be part of
11
the activities of NGOs. When present they are part of people’s social protection and the context in
which they act. Here the influence of these protective actions on disaster risk will be discussed. Since
this thesis concerns women’s response to the risks and hazards they face, the main focus will be on
its relation with and influence on people’s capacities and actions. The effectiveness of protective
actions is the subject of discussion at both scientific and political level. Here however the focus will
be on how these protective actions are perceived and how they may affect local response to risks
and hazards.
Social protection.
‘Protective actions carried out by larger entities’ is a factor besides capacity that can counteract
vulnerability (Wisner et al., 2012). Although referring to the state and (i)NGOs (ibid), these protective
actions also include actions undertaken collectively by a community, or groups of people otherwise
organized (Wisner et al., 2004). They include hazard precautions and preparedness and can be
structural measures like river embankments and storm shelters, as well as community coping
mechanisms and communal charity. The protective actions are the social protection that is referred
to in the paragraph on vulnerability at household level. Like the ‘unsafe conditions’ in the PAR model,
it is a local expression of larger processes. Just as social, political and economic processes can lead to
conditions that make people susceptible to harm in times of hazards, they can also contribute to
protection (ibid).
Outside assistance does not automatically mean actual protection for people. Although Birkmann
(2011) found that the relative poor people in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam consider external or
government support the most important support they get in times of major flood, not all support is
effective. Protective actions need to be attuned to the context, both geographically, socially,
economically and politically, in order to meet the needs at a certain location. There is not one
solution that fits everywhere, therefore the participation of local communities is required to enhance
capacities, reduce vulnerabilities and build resilience3 (Gaillard, 2010). Their knowledge and practices
tend to be locally appropriate and socially responsible, and gives insight in the local perspectives and
priorities. Including people and their knowledge in the process of assisting them empowers them and
increases the chance of successful protection (Mallick et al., 2005). Actual social protection thus
results from alignment of assistance with a specific situation, and with people and their needs.
3 Resilience is one of the main concept in disaster studies nowadays. In the context of natural hazards, where
social and ecological systems meet, resilience ‘refers to the magnitude of disturbance that can be absorbed before a system changes to a radically different state as well as the capacity to self-organise and the capacity for adaptation to emerging circumstances’ (Adger, 2006:268). As such it is a normative description of a situation. The focus of this research however is on hazard impact and response, for which a livelihood approach and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity are thought to be more useful. Therefore the choice is made not to include this popular concept. Resilience is nevertheless closely linked to effective hazard response and livelihoods, and it is argued ‘vulnerability is influenced by the elements of social-ecological resilience’ (Adger, 2006:269).
12
Vulnerability and outside assistance.
The impact of natural hazards is socially constructed and people’s livelihoods, in particular their
access to resources, are at the core of their vulnerability. In case of severe impacts outside assistance
often fails to reduce people’s vulnerability by meeting their immediate needs only without taking
into account the future and support of livelihoods (Cannon et al., 2003). Although the Hyogo
Framework for Action 2005-2015 formally mainstreamed Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) into
development by making ‘more effective integration of disaster risk’ the first of its three strategic
goals (Benson & Twigg, 2007), many development initiatives also fail to reduce people’s vulnerability.
In development there is often little attention to disaster-related issues, as priority is given to social
and economic issues. Development and development failure nevertheless greatly influence people’s
vulnerability in face of hazards, and in return do hazards and disaster leave a heavy toll on
development (Gaillard, 2010).
It proves hard to integrate all aspects of influence on people’s vulnerability in development and DRR.
Despite good intentions and temporarily success, outside assistance does not necessarily reduce
vulnerability and create protection. Instead it can ‘create new forms of vulnerability or exacerbate
existing ones’ (Benson & Twigg, 2007), for example by changing livelihoods in a none-hazard proof
way. Otherwise, as vulnerability is a social product, power relations can exclude those most
vulnerable from benefitting from outside assistance (Juneja, 2008). The very poor in society are often
allocated less resources as they have more difficulties with articulating their needs compared to
more influential groups (Gow and Morss, in Hutton & Haque, 2004). It is therefore important that
both people’s livelihoods and the (power) relations in a community are taken into account. Including
all aspects discussed here as being of influence on the impact of hazards Cannon and his colleagues
state outside assistance can contribute to people’s protection and reduce vulnerability when it: 1)
strengthens peoples’ nutritional, health, morale and other aspects of their well-being; 2) reinforces
their livelihood and its resilience to hazard impacts; 3) increases their capacity of self-protection,
and; 4) arranges access to social protection measures (Cannon et al, 2003).
Capacity and outside assistance.
Increasing people’s capacity and self-protection is according to Cannon and his colleagues (2003) an
important aspect of improving their protection against hazards and reducing their vulnerability. This
is no more than logic as local communities almost always form the first line of defence in case of
natural hazards and disasters. People have developed their own ways of coping, and ‘as long as they
are empowered with adequate resources’ they have the capacities for dealing with natural hazards
on their own (Gaillard, 2010). The access to resources can thus increase people’s capacity, and
following the theory on vulnerability and capacity, so can the improvement and use of people’s social
network. In case of floods in Bangladesh, outside assistance combined with people’s relations, their
social capital, significantly improved people’s capacity and reduced their vulnerability (Paul &
Routray 2010, 2011).
The effect of outside assistance is two sided, as measures taken to protect people and enable them
to live with risk, can also create dependency and reduce people’s capacity (Gaillard, 2010). People
built their livelihoods in a context of larger scale social, political and economic processes and social
13
and economic relations. It is in the same context, through its power relations, that structural
measures to counter the negative impacts of natural hazards are selected by governments or other
large entities. These measures often change the context in which people live, creating a new context,
introducing new situations. Outside assistance, or protective actions taken in the form of structural
adaptation measures not only provide protection, if they do, but also demand adaptation or
adjustment. The ability of people to adapt to these measures, the changed context of their lives, and
the changed dynamics of risk, can be both positively and negatively affect their capacity (Birkmann,
2011).
2.5. People’s response to hazards: a reflection on the theory.
The actions people take to reduce their vulnerability to hazard impacts, are a display of their agency,
showing their capacity to act. Taking this as the starting point of their response to risk and hazard
impacts, response can be understood in the context of unsafe conditions deriving from large-scale
and long-term processes in society and household livelihood choices and dynamics. Social and
economic relations are among the most important factors as well as people’s capacity to employ
these relations to access resources needed. The capacity to act depends on these relations and
access, but actual action also depends on people’s personal characteristics, their engagement in a
situation as well as their experience, knowledge, life expectations and beliefs. Moreover hazard
characteristics, as well as social protection influence response taken. As hazards tend to have
unfolding impacts through time and response to these actions change situations, including people’s
vulnerabilities and capacities, response has to be understood as dynamic and context dependent.
The discussed theory on disasters and disaster risk has led to the identification of important issues to
be researched in order to understand the dynamics behind hazard impacts and household response.
Besides the investigation of actual actions taken, insight in the following issues is thought important:
the hazards itself, the risks and impacts, livelihoods, household social and economic relations,
people’s personal characteristics (experience, knowledge, expectation, belief), outside assistance and
social protection. How these are incorporated in the actual research will be discussed in the next
chapter on the research methodology.
14
3. METHODOLOGY
The general aim of this research is to gain insight in household response to risk and impact of natural
hazards and disasters, and outside assistance. In this chapter the methods used to reach this aim are
discussed. The chapter has been divided in three parts. The first part explains the data collection and
the second part discusses the analysis of the data and its reporting. The final part is a reflection on
the chosen methodology and points out some of its weaknesses and strengths.
3.1. Data collection.
Following the process of exploring theory on disaster and response, literature on coping in
Bangladesh4, and formulating a main question and sub-questions, the research methods have been
chosen. They are based on the actor-oriented approach and link to the aims of this research. They
are discussed here shortly, followed by short descriptions of the research location and respondents.
Research methods.
People themselves are best able to represent their perspective on hazards and talking with them was
most important way of data collection. Individual interviews are the main research method applied in
this research, and 31 interviews have been done. Based on the theory discussed, the themes
included in the main question of this thesis, and a literature study on local response to hazards in
Bangladesh a list of topics has been made (see appendix). This list guided the interviews and
discussion of people’s lives, livelihood, problems, view on hazards and related problems, response to
hazards and outside assistance, and helped to address relevant issues. The interviews were partly
structured by the topics identified in advance. Yet the answers of the women, and the issues on
which they seemed to put emphasis were very important and were allowed to take over the course
of the interviews. As a result not every topic is discussed in every interview.
The individual interviews have been
complemented with a group interview and a
risk mapping done in Kochukata (picture 1).
This choice has been made because it helps
understand the women’s risk perceptions
and response, and improves communication
about risk between the women and me
(Sudmeier-Rieux, Jaquet, Derron et al.,
2012: 682). Furthermore, to get the context
of the research more clear and to gather
interesting examples and relevant info for
the interviews, additional interviews with
people on the streets, in tea shops and at
4 Included in the next chapter about the research context.
Picture 1: Risk mapping during the group interview
15
NGOs were conducted. Moreover transect walks have been done to get a clearer idea of the daily
lives of people, the problems they face and what happens when the hazards they experience as
harmful occur. The data gathered through these methods have been used in sketching the context of
the stories women told, and is integrated in the results presented in the next chapters.
Research location.
The research locations were picked based on
the research aim and the advice and
possibilities offered by Unnayan Shahojogy
Team (UST), my hosting NGO in Bangladesh.
Nilphamari and Gaibandha district in
Bangladesh’s northern Rangpur division have
been chosen. Rangpur division has, together
with Barisal, the highest poverty head count
ratio of Bangladesh. Moreover a relation is
found between poverty and proneness to
natural disasters, especially the flooding of the
Jamuna river, within the district (WorldBank,
BBS & WFP, n.d). This made the locations
interesting for this research. More detailed
descriptions of the actual research locations
can be found in the next chapter on the
research context.
Research participants.
Women from poor landless households were the focus group in this research. Initial contacts were
made through the contacts of UST and their employees. Most participants however have been
approached on the streets and selected based on some basic questions about their sources of
income and land-ownership. Based on the initial contacts made, new participants were selected
through snowball-sampling. A total of 31 women aged between 19 and 80 years old5 from 4 unions
were interviewed. They came from Kochukata Porchim Para in Kachukata Union; Porchim
Khutiamara Alim Madrasha Para, Porchim Khutiamara Nodir Par, and Porchim Khutiamara Nodir Par
Hindu Para in Khutamara Union6; Parakut in Putimari Union; Thoikorer Para, Uttar (north) Thoikorer
Para, Pabantair, and Bangar Para in Haldia Union.
5 Age is often guessed by the women, only few know their exact age.
6 In this thesis these three are referred to a Khutiamara (Alim Madrasha)
Map 1: the 7 divisions of Bangladesh
16
3.2. Data analysis.
Two issues have been important in the analysis and reporting of the data collected. First analysis the
data had to contribute to answering the main question and meeting the research aims. Second, the
stories of the women had to play a major role in the report, both recognizable as their stories, as well
as real and imaginable for the reader. The decisions made concerning these two issues are discussed
here.
Analysis of the interviews.
Since the main focus is on what the women’s stories, the interviews have all been recorded and
worked out literally before analysing them. The central concepts as they were operationalized and
processed in the list guiding the interviews, have also been the main guide in coding the stories of
the women. All interviews have been coded through colouring the parts on people’s livelihoods, on
natural hazards, hazard impacts, household response and outside assistance. The coded parts have
then been furthermore specified. On impact and response for example, tags were used for parts
referring to human lives, houses and shelter, household items, crops or garden, poultry or livestock,
food and food security, work and income, drinking water and sanitation, or something else. This has
then been furthermore specified into whether action was taken before, during or after the impact of
a hazard.
Report writing.
The emphasis in the report is on the stories the women told. These stories are the base on which an
answer to the question of ‘How women from poor landless households in Nilphamari and Gaibandha
district, Bangladesh, perceive and respond to the recurring natural hazards and disasters they face
and the outside assistance they receive’. With the help of coding, they have been put together to
sketch a picture of their lives before, during and after the hazards they face in order to give insight in
how they deal with the impact. A lot of examples have been used in order to keep the women at the
center of this research. In between the telling of their stories however, links are made to the theory
on disaster, vulnerability and capacity, to place their stories in a scientific context and link the
information it provides to the main question and topics of this research. On the links to the theory,
research aim and main question is reflected in the discussion to be able to draw a conclusion on
household response to natural hazards.
3.3. Discussion and limitations.
The set-up of this research and the chosen methods of data-collection and analysis have resulted in a
good amount of data. There were however also some flaws in its design and obstacles hampering its
execution, of which some are without a doubt due to my own inexperience. Three of them I think are
important to mention, starting with the barrier that existed between the women I interviewed and
me. Due to my lack of the Bengal language and understanding of its culture, I felt the interviews
could not reach the depth I wished. All interviews were done with the help of student translators,
which made the conversations indirect and sometimes led to misunderstandings and
17
miscommunication. Moreover the fact that I was learning about the culture and livelihoods of the
women, the same moment I was researching it for the purpose of understanding the impact and
response to hazards, may have led to lack of depth, due to a lack of understanding on my side.
Besides, it became more and more clear the women and I have way different understandings of
natural hazards and disasters, probably due to life’s experience. I know I did not completely grasp
their perspective and experience, and I still do understand for what it is, but by telling what they told
me I believe this thesis helps to understand it in the context of our (by our culture shaped)
understanding of hazards and disasters.
The obvious barrier between the women and me, in language and culture, but also in appearance,
affected my research in another way. I was a curiosity and my presence cause attention and led to
expectation. I found out I was automatically linked to money and seen as someone able to provide
people help. As gossiping is one of the women’s favourite pastimes, my presence and activities were
soon known at the places I did my interviews. I attracted lots of people and individual interviews
were seldom individual as there were almost always bystanders that could have influenced answers
by their being, looks and comments. Moreover I found out my interviews evoked certain answers
due to its topic, and the fact women had discussed my presence and activities among themselves. A
transect walk I made through Kochukata is a good illustration. As I was talking to a man on the street
about the rainy season, women came by and according to my translator they convinced him to
change his answers. The expectations my presence raised are likely to be reflected in women’s
answers to my questions. This is however not seen as a big flaw, since it is known and it does also
give some insight in their situation.
The choice of the locations has definitely influenced the research and its findings. Two locations were
chosen, but due to that it was hard to really get to know the situation and the context you are
researching. Furthermore the first location in Nilphamari turned out to face most problems from
monga and poverty. Monga can be regarded a hazard as it is a period of high unemployment. It does
have connections with the rainy season, but has to do with the agricultural calendar rather than
extreme weather events. Nevertheless did the location lead to very interesting interviews on the
effects of the weather and the (by many considered moderate) floods in the rainy season on the lives
of the poor. Unfortunately the situation differed much from the second location in Rangpur, putting
some challenges to the analysis and reporting of the gathered data.
18
4. THE BENGAL CONTEXT OF HAZARDS AND RESPONSE
The occurrence of natural hazards is booming and thanks to the discussion on climate change
everyone knows. This chapter discusses the Bengal context and illustrates the situation at the
research locations. The response of government and NGOs to natural hazards is discussed and an
overview of what is already known about local coping strategies in Bangladesh is given. Finally the
situation at the research locations will be described and serves as an introduction on the daily lives
discussed in the next chapter.
4.1. Natural hazards, disasters, impacts and response in Bangladesh .
Bangladesh is a country in which the in the introduction described worldwide trends in disaster
occurrence and damage costs are reflected. Cyclones, floods, droughts, earthquakes, tornados and
famines are regular recurring events in Bangladesh (Department of Disaster Management, 2012). In
the period of 1980-2010 the country faced at least 234 disasters in which 191,836 people died, which
equals over 6,000 deaths a year. Moreover, on average over 10 million people are affected every
year and annual economic damages exceed the US $ 550 million (PreventionWeb, 2012).
Storms/cyclones and floods are the most regular occurring hazards in Bangladesh, costing the
country most, both in terms of lives lost, lives affected and economic damages (see table 1). The
deadliest and probably the best known storm in the last 30 years is the 1991 cyclone that hit
Bangladesh in April that year. It took the lives of 138,866 people, and affected the lives of over 15
million Bangladeshi (EM-DAT, 2012b).
Table 1: Most costly disasters of the last 30 years in Bangladesh
Table 1a: number of people affected Table 1b: number of people killed Table 1c: economic damage
Year & Disaster People
Affected Year & Disaster
People
killed Year & Disaster
Costs
(US$x1000)
1988 Flood 45,000,000 1991 Storm 138,866 1998 Flood 4,300,000
2004 Flood 36,000,000 1985 Storm 15,000 2007 Storm 2,300,000
1984 Flood 30,000,000 2007 Storm 4,234 2004 Flood 2,200,000
1987 Flood 29,700,000 1982 Epidemic 2,696 1988 Flood 2,137,000
1983 Drought 20,000,000 1988 Flood 2,379 1991 Storm 1,780,000
1991 Storm 15,438,849 1987 Flood 2,055 1995 Storm 800,000
1998 Flood 15,000,050 1991 Epidemic 1,700 1987 Flood 727,500
2007 Flood 13,771,380 1984 Flood 1,200 2000 Flood 500,000
1995 Flood 12,656,006 2007 Flood 1,110 2004 Earthquake 500,000
1993 Flood 11,469,537 1998 Flood 1,050 1987 Flood 330,000
Source: EM-DAT, 2012b
In general, both the extreme and the recurring smaller natural disasters and disaster losses affect the
development process in Bangladesh and mean a significant set-back to the country’s development
(Mallick et al., 2005; Khan & Rahman, 2007). Although the country has seen a steady growth of 1.6
percent in its Human Development Index value, since 1980, with a score of 0.515 the country is still
19
ranked in the low development category. Moreover the positive development is unequally
distributed among the population, and a great deal of its momentum can be regarded lost due to
this. According to data from 2007, 58 percent of the Bengal population faces multiple deprivations in
education, health and/or standard of living, and another 21 percent are susceptible to this. Looking
at income poverty, over 40 percent lives below the poverty line of US $1.25 a day (UNDP, 2013). Due
to their poverty, many poor Bangladeshis do not have sufficient means to cope and lack effective
safety nets. Therefore they are regarded more vulnerable than other people in case of natural
hazards and disasters (Akter, 2012; Bannerman, Rashid & Revje, 2011).
Response from government and NGOs.
The management of natural disasters is one of the key development challenges for Bangladesh
(Mallick et al., 2005). Thanks to its long history with natural hazards, the country can face this
challenge with an already developed extensive informal and institutional structure for disaster
management (DMB & DMRD, 2010; Khan & Rahman, 2007). Moreover, the Government of
Bangladesh (GoB) signed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
and finished its National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) including short and long-term plans to
build capacities and resilience among communities at risk (Akter, 2012). The government aims “to
reduce the risk of people, especially the poor and the disadvantaged, from the effects of natural,
environmental and human induced hazards, to a manageable and acceptable humanitarian level, and
to have in place an efficient emergency response system capable of handling large scale disasters”
(Disaster Management Vision, n.d.). Moreover it has set the goal ‘to empower at risk communities’,
and made ‘the benefit of vulnerable communities, especially women and the poor and socially
disadvantaged’ a core principle in its national plan (DMB & DMRD, 2010).
In 2004 the Comprehensive Disaster Management Programme (CDMP) was developed to tackle the
government’s lack of capacity for effective implementation of its plans. This programme promotes
cooperation and coordination between government, development partners, civil society and NGOs.
Consortia and partnerships have been established to set priorities and allocate resources
(Bannerman et al., 2011). A multi-level and multi-agency network has developed, including
ministries, ministry departments, (i)NGOs, the Bangladesh Red Crescent/Cross Society (BRCS),
voluntary organizations and official committees with community representatives7 (DMB & DMRD,
2010; Khan & Rahman, 2007). Cooperation like this between the GoB and (i)NGOs is unprecedented,
as can be explained by the country’s history.
After the independence-war ended in 1971 Bangladesh had an acute need for assistance to help
those affected by the war. A task local, newly established and international NGOs take on as the
newly established government lacks the experience and resources to take care of all people in need.
They prove better capable in the disbursement of relief than government agencies and through time
many donor agencies continue to channel their relief aid through NGOs, even after the GoB proves
itself capable after a disastrous flood in 1998 (Matin & Taher, 2001; Paul, 2006). The sector grows
and develops from relief and rehabilitation via participatory development to more self-reliant
7 An overview of the Disaster Management Institutions and Legislations can be found in Bangladesh’s ‘National
Plan for Disaster Management 2010-2015’ (DMB & DMRD, 2010), or in Khan & Rahman (2007) who assess the partnership approach in Bangladesh’s Disaster Management.
20
development, in order to avoid ‘relief-dependency’ and to reduce the vulnerability of the poor to
hazards of various nature. Nowadays most NGOs in Bangladesh focus on savings and micro-credit for
the poor, and empowerment of the marginalised. Most disaster response is still limited to post-
disaster relief and the channelling of foreign aid (Matin & Taher, 2001).
The need for a combined short-term relief and long-term preparedness has become more
acknowledged since the 1990s, also in Bangladesh. Nevertheless, many NGOs prefer a pragmatic
combination of ‘development’ and ‘disaster’, and disaster response is limited to relief, capacity
building and livelihood development initiatives do not get linked to hazards, and the nature of the
development-disaster link often remains unaddressed (Matin & Taher, 2001; Jenkins, 2003). With a
focus on micro-credit and savings the question is whether NGOs are able to help poor and
marginalised people in their needs to deal with natural hazards. Emphasis is often placed on socio-
economic improvement rather than local capacity building benefitting people susceptible for harm
from natural hazards. Mostly big NGOs risk alienation from the poorest people and grass root issues
that once dominated their agendas. Successes in reducing the disaster-vulnerability of the poorest
and most vulnerable people are often achieved by smaller local NGOs that work in partnership with
larger international NGOs. These partnerships empower people to cope with for example floods, as
they use local knowledge and initiative. Solutions found are practical strategies supported with the
supply of resources needed (Jenkins, 2003).
Literature suggests Bangladesh has a well-developed government structure and NGO sector to
protect people against natural hazards, reduce their vulnerability and increase their capacity to act.
Main actors are the GoB and its bodies, with at the community level the Union Parishad (UP) and
Union Disaster Management Committee (UDMC), the Bangladesh Red Crescent/Cross Society (BRCS),
(i)NGOs such as CARE, Oxfam, BRAC and Proshika, and the small local NGOs and community based
organisations (CBOs) (DMB & DMRD, 2010; Khan & Rahman, 2007, Matin & Taher, 2001). Their
actions discussed above, link to different aspects of the PAR model and the external side of
vulnerability. On the one hand the CDMP reflects the realization of the GoB that addressing root
causes, in order to reduce people’s vulnerability, needs institutional support at all levels from
national to local. On the other hand, the NGO sector, largely focuses on the unsafe conditions related
to poverty. As Jenkins (2003) however argues, people not only need socio-economic improvement
but also capacity building and knowledge to cope. NGOs thus not only risk alienation, but like the
PAR model risk project ‘failure’ because of a lack of connection to people’s perception of and
response to hazard impacts.
Individual and household response.
On the response of Bengali people to the natural hazards they face, most is known about people in
the coastal areas facing cyclones, and people on chars facing floods. In general research on coping
and response to natural hazards in Bangladesh shows the impacts are location specific and damage is
uneven distributed. People’s ability to cope also varies and depends, among other things, on their
socio-economic conditions, living location, education, awareness of risk, and occupation (Paul &
Routray, 2010). Research on the 1998 flood shows hazards can affect several aspects of people’s
lives, like their house, land and other assets, employment, health, consumption and nutrition (Del
Ninno, Dorosh, Smith & Roy, 2001; Khandker, 2007). Their response is based on their perception of
21
the risk, the magnitude and intensity of the hazard, and dependent on their age, gender, job, income,
social class, family size, and the information and external assistance available to them (Paul &
Routray, 2010, 2011).
Following the theory on capacity and the ideas of response and adaptation capacities (Birkmann et
al, 2013), and the stages of disaster management (Wisner & Adams, 2002), three stages of protective
actions can be distinguished in local response to hazards in Bangladesh:
- Protective action well in advance of a hazard: These actions indicate anticipation of the possible
effects certain hazards will have on household’s livelihoods. The actions aim to minimize loss and
facilitate recovery, and include (amongst others): a plan for action, adaptation of houses and
homesteads, construction of a shelter, structural measures to protect belongings and animals,
diversification of livelihoods, crop selection and adjustment of cultivation activities, and money
saving and food stocking (Lein, 2009; Paul & Routray, 2010, 2011).
- Protective action during the occurrence of a hazard: These actions focus on coping with the
situation during a hazard and are taken immediately before, during or directly after its
occurrence. Actions aim to safe whatever can be saved by acting at the moment and focus on
protection of family, animals, house and belongings, and securing food and water (Del Ninno et
al, 2001; Lein, 2009; Paul & Routray, 2010, 2011). Response can be of very different order
however. During the 1998 flood people adopted strategies ranged from skipping meals and
selling household assets, to migration (Khandker, 2007).
- Protective action after a hazard: These actions aim to overcome the impact of hazards, secure
income and reduce further risks. Actions focus on repairing damage, securing food and income,
and include alternative income earning, relying on savings, money borrowing, loans, disposal of
household assets, depending on relief, changed eating behaviour (Del Ninno et al, 2001; Lein,
2009; Paul & Routray, 2010, 2011).
Indigenous knowledge and strategies as well as the borrowing of money and other resources are
found as major household responses to flood and cyclones in Bangladesh (Masud-All-Kamal, 2013;
Paul & Routray, 2010, 2011; Sultana & Rayhan, 2012). Social ties, bonding and safety nets, as well as
intra-community cooperation and informal risk sharing are very important mechanisms through
which this happens (Alam & Collins, 2010; Paul & Routray, 2011), but also formal forms of
microfinance often help people compensate for their losses (Khandker, 2007). Many of this happens
post-disaster, but people adopt coping strategies in a sequential order, dependent on the situation
and whether the disaster has surpassed their capacity to cope on their own with the resources they
have (Paul & Routray, 2010, 2011).
4.2. A description of the research locations.
The research locations in Nilphamari and Gaibandha district are not found in any of the literature on
local coping with natural hazards. The districts are not known for their disaster proneness, but rather
for their poverty. Nevertheless correlations are found between the district’s poverty and proneness
to natural disasters, especially the flooding of the Jamuna river (WorldBank, BBS & WFP, n.d). A short
description of the areas will be given here, including some geographical and weather-related facts.
22
Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara in Nilphamari district .
Nilphamari district has a population of 1,834,231 people (around 1180/km2). The district counts 6
upazilas and 87 unions, covering 361 villages8 (BBS, 2007a; BBS & SID, 2011, 2012a). The villages
Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara included in my research are located in the neighboring rural
unions Kachukata, Khutamara and Putimari with populations of 25,431 (1198/km2), 34,103
(1286/km2), and 33,254 (1390/km2), and average household sizes of just over 4 persons. The unions
have vibrant rural markets and the employment rates are on average 88 per cent among men, and 5
per cent among women9. Of them 82-92 per cent work in agriculture, 2-3 per cent in industry and 6-
15 per cent in the service sector. Most women do household work and are not looking for work (BBS
& SID, 2012a). It is estimated that over 44 per cent of the population in Nilphamari is extreme poor
and is not able to daily acquire a basket of food meeting their nutritional needs (WorldBank, BBS &
WFP, n.d; WFP, 2005).
Map 1: Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara in Nilphamari district.
There is no indication there are regular reoccurring natural disasters in Nilphamari. No records of
these can be found in the countries’ national plan or any other resource or database on the internet.
News articles and maps on flooding however indicate flash floods do occur now and then (Flood,
2000; Flood, n.d.). Moreover extreme weather like storms with lots of rain, hail and thunder, and
extreme cold weather with casualties and damage do occur10, but no official records on this can be
8 Bangladesh has a very complicated division of overlapping geographical and administrative units, consisting of
Divisions, Disticts, Upazilas/Thanas, Unions, Mauzas, Villages and Wards, of which those mentioned are sufficient for this research. 9 Taken the population aged 7 years and above not attending school.
10 E.g.: ‘Storm lashes Nilphamari five times in 24 hours’ (http://bdnews24.com, May 19, 2005); ‘One killed as
nor'wester lashes Nilphamari’ (http://www.snnbd.com, May 7,2009); ‘Cold takes heavy toll on Nilphamari
23
found. For cases that call for outside assistance there is nevertheless the Union Disaster
Management Committee (UDMC), established by the GoB and led by the Union Parishad Chairman11.
This committee is responsible for disaster risk reduction and emergency response, according to its
tasks and responsibilities described in its standing orders (see: DDM, n.d.). Moreover there were 61
NGOs active in the district in 2007, and 2 development projects were running on health, 9 on poverty
alleviation, 10 on roads and communication, 21 on agriculture and food, 8 on education, and 6 on
not otherwise specified issues (BBS, 2007a). There is no record of projects on disaster management
or risk reduction.
Toikorerpara and Uttar Toikorerpara in Gaibandha district.
Gaibandha district has a population of 2,379,255 people (around 1125/km2). In 2011 the district was
divided in 7 Upazilas and 82 unions, covering 1250 villages (BBS & SID, 2011, 2012b). The villages
Toikorerpara and Uttar Toikorerpara included in my research lie in Haldia union, part of Saghatta
upazila12, with a population of 21,862 (467/km2) and an average household size of just under 4
persons. Haldia has a rural market, but it is at the border of the union and kilometres away from the
villages. The employment rates in the union, are 83 per cent among men, and 4 per cent among
women13. Of the employed 92 per cent works in agriculture, 1 per cent in industry, and 7 per cent in
the service sector. Just as in Kachukata, Khutamara and Putimari, most women are not looking for
work but work in their own household (BBS & SID, 2012b). It is estimated that between 33 and 43 per
cent of the population in Gaibandha is extreme poor and is not able to daily acquire a basket of food
meeting their nutritional needs (WorldBank, BBS & WFP, n.d; WFP, 2005).
Map 2: Toikorerpara and Uttar Toikorerpara in Gaibandha district.
children. One killed, hundreds affected in last 10 days’ (archive.thedailystar.net, November 2, 2011); ‘15 villages go under water in Nilphamari’ (http://theindependentbd.com, July 9, 2013); 11
The equivalent of a mayor. 12
An upazila is a smaller administrative unit than the division in which it is located, a union even smaller. 13
Taken the population aged 7 years and above not attending school.
24
The most common natural hazards in Gaibandha are flash and river flooding and river bank erosion,
especially at the river banks and locations near the Jamuna river (DMB & DMRD, 2010; Flood, 2000;
Flood, n.d.). Cyclones, nor’westers or tornados do not occur here, although tornados have
incidentally passed by (DMB & DMRD, 2010). Extreme weather, however occurs regularly in certain
seasons. Although no official records have been found, news articles can be found on casualties and
damage due to thunder, hail, storms and abnormal low temperatures14. Just as in Kachukata and
Khutamara there is a UDMC responsible for disaster risk reduction and emergency response. In 2007
there were also 20 NGOs active in Saghatta and 4 development projects were running on health, 4 on
poverty alleviation, 4 on family planning, 16 on roads and communication, 8 on agriculture and food,
and 8 on education (BBS, 2007b). No account is however found on projects running on disaster
management or risk reduction.
14
E.g.: ‘Tornadoes hit northern Bangladesh’ (http://news.bbc.co.uk, March 21, 2005); ‘Flood victims face food, water crises in northern Bangladesh’ (businessnews-bd.com, July 2, 2012); ‘Rain triggers floods in Gaibandha’ (archive.thedailystar.net, September 19, 2012); ‘Rising water level deteriorates flood situation in Gaibandha’ (www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com, September 28, 2012); ‘Gaibandha flood situation worsens as dyke collapses. 50 villages flooded in Sirajganj’ (www.thedailystar.net, September 12, 2013).
25
5. DAILY LIFE
This chapter is the first of the chapters presenting the results of this research. It discusses the daily
lives of the women spoken to and thereby links to the theory on vulnerability and capacity in which
people’s livelihood and the context in which they build it are important factors. It is the starting point
of gaining insight in their response, as it helps to understand which aspects of people’s lives are
susceptible to harm from natural hazards or provide them the resources needed to adequately
respond to its threats. Although this will be discussed further in the next chapters, understanding it
starts here. Daily life as told by the women at both research locations is described here, as well as the
problems they face and the natural hazards that interrupts daily life. With the main focus on the
rainy season and storms, as these turn out to be the natural events posing most threats and
challenges to life, the next chapters then tell the stories of life during the rainy season and storms,
the challenges it poses, life after it, and outside assistance as it is perceived and affects hazard
impacts and coping strategies.
5.1. Life in the rural areas surrounding Kochukata and Tangomari Hat .
In Bangladesh’s northern Rangpur division halfway between Nilphamari and Djaldhaka, where the
road between these cities crosses a for Bengal norms small and on the map nameless river, lie the
market places Kochukata Hat and Tangomari Hat. Travelling from Nilphamari to Djaldhaka you would
first pass Kochukata Hat, then cross the river, and 1.5 km north-east you would pass Tangomari Hat.
These two market places are the centres of local trade of both Kachukata and Khutamara Union and
cover a collection of (among others) tea hostels, market stalls with fresh food, both meat and
vegetables, shops for office and household supplies, and blacksmiths and carpenters. During the day
and early in the evening these places are busy like beehives as people, just like the roads, from
surrounding villages and smaller bazaars come together.
Picture 2: harvesting tobacco and potatoes.
Both women and men participate.
Picture 3: market place.
A scene dominated by men.
26
Kachukata Porchim Para, Parakut, and Porchim Khutiamara Alim Madrasha Para15, are some of the
markets’ neighbouring villages. In January the roads from the markets to these villages will lead you
through fields of sprouting tobacco, potatoes, paddy and rapeseed. Even the river, with just a
fraction of the water it contains in the rainy season, is taken over by farmers to grow paddy. It seems
every inch of land you’ll pass is used either to live or to grow crops. Yet the view is diverse as crops
alternate with other crops almost as much as cultivated land with houses, saw mills and schools.
Villages are never far apart, and people are everywhere. During the day it is hard to follow a road for
only 50 meters without meeting someone else. In the villages, on the fields and on the road outside
the market places, you see both men and women (picture 2). In the crowded market place the scene
is dominated by men (picture 3).
Daily life.
Compared to midday the roads around Kochukata Hat and Tangomari Hat are quiet around 8 in the
morning. The cold January nights have caused a blanket of fog above fields and in between the
houses and only those who have to be outside are outside. Apart from a few exceptions the fields are
still empty. The quiet stream of people walking or cycling the roads are on their way to work. Most of
them are men, and because of the cold they are wearing socks, or ear warmers and extra shawls,
some even have them wrapped around their head. Before they left the house, wives and mothers got
up at 6 or 7 am in the morning to do chores and breakfast made of rice and potatoes. After breakfast
most men leave for work, as they are the main providers of the family. Around 9 am the children
leave for school, and after that the women also go their way.
Many poor families depend on their incomes earned with day labour in agriculture or brick factories,
or with van pulling. In lesser degrees families also depend on fishing or remittances from migrated
husbands or children. Day laborers find a job based on demand and the amount of work available.
This makes their income uncertain and irregular, even more so since agricultural practices are based
on season and weather. As van pullers men often hire a van or, if they are lucky, buy their own with
the help of micro-credit. Incomes from day labor, van pulling of a hired or own van, or fishing, do not
differ much and vary between 100 and 200 taka per day, which equals € 0,96 - € 1,92 or $ 1,26 - $
2,5416. For many families it is difficult to meet all their needs from this income. Some families even
do no longer have the income of a man to rely on. Women therefore sometimes work as day laborer
in agriculture or housekeeping to earn some money or food for the day.
During the day many women take care of animals, cultivate land, grow vegetables to eat or sell the
fruits of their labour. Vegetables are often grown near the house or on vacant land in order to feed
the family, only in case of unexpected high yields the vegetables are sold. Some families are also able
to access land and animals through ‘adi’. According to this principle families pay the input needed for
growing crops on land and nurturing animals not their own. In case of land they also pay half of the
yield to the landowner, while they can keep the other half, either to be sold or stored for own use. In
case of animals also half of the output has to be paid and half can be kept, meaning they can have
the second born or half of the selling price of the raised animal. Taking care of the land or animals, as
15
From now on referred to as Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara 16
Exchange rate of June 20, 2013, according to the calculator on http://www.wisselkoers.nl/
27
many only have access to one of these, does not take the whole day, and if there is no work or they
have finished the women like to visit other women and spend the rest of the day gossiping.
At the end of the afternoon, around 5 or 6 pm the men arrive home and the women start cooking.
This takes them around 2 hours and the families often eat at around 8 or 9 pm. Most of the time they
eat rice, a preparation of lentils called ‘dahl’, cauliflower and potato. After dinner the children do
their homework, the men go to the market and the women stay at home to watch the children. They
do not have much to do then, except for repairing clothes sometimes. Around 10 pm everyone goes
to sleep, to start the same routine the next morning, for 7 days a week. For ultra-poor women
however, life may be somewhat different as they tend to do day labour more often than other
women. They work in the field of others or do other people’s housekeeping.
Problems and coping strategies in daily life.
On the question which problems they face in their lives most women in Kochukata, Parakut and
Khutiamara mention problems with money and income. A woman in Kochukata, whose husband and
son are van pullers and earn between 100 and 150 taka a day, explains: “We do not have any other
income options, only the van. If they [husband and son] can earn, we can eat, otherwise it is difficult.
[…] We go to the neighbors [for help], but they are also poor, that is why they only give advice and
nothing else”17
This women’s reaction reflects the answer of many women. Income is needed to eat, and if there is
no income or not enough problems arise with food, clothing, school, dowry, and housing. Only little
support can be expected and only little support can be given, as most families are in the exact same
position. A woman, whose husband has broken his arm and cannot work at the moment, states: “If
you face any problems, other people don’t help you. If the person has money, you go there and
borrow it. But they take a lot of interest”18.
Borrowing is the most common strategy to overcome problems with income and secure the needs of
the family. People borrow from the richer people against a high interest, or from NGOs like RDRS,
BRAC, GrameenBank, SHARP or ASA. This happens quite often as fixed wages are rare and injuries
and illness not uncommon and directly threaten the food security and other needs of families.
Moreover the natural hazards discussed hereafter do threaten income and obstruct the opportunity
to work and earn.
Natural events interfering with daily life.
Since it is January some of the women face difficulties with the cold. More often than before they
face unusual low temperatures for which they don’t have the proper clothes to protect their children
and themselves. Moreover the cold and the fog are threatening the health of the animals and the
crops and vegetables on the field. The cold even made it to the national papers this year19. Referring
to the fog one women said that this winter ‘there was a day without sunlight, it was all dark for one
17
Mst. Deguda Begum (35-40 yrs), living with husband (van puller) and 2 sons in Kochukata 18
Shada Rani (35 yrs), living with husband (day labourer) and 5 children in Parakut. 19
‘Cold claims 7 lives in Nilphamari’ (http://www.banglanews24.com, January 11, 2013)
28
day’20. It is however not the cold, but storms and floods that pose most challenges to the lives of the
poor women in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara. In what follows the natural hazards that cause
problems will be described as it was told by them. In their accounts, wind, rain, collapsing houses,
thunder strikes, destroyed crops and trees, often become one story. Words like weather and storm
are unfamiliar, and weather aspects and effects are intertwined and inseparable in the women’s
stories on storms and floods.
The rainy season.
The weather in the rainy season or monsoon is mentioned by many women in Kochukata, Parakut
and Khutiamara as interfering most with their daily lives. This season starts in the Bengali months
Ashaŗh and Srabon and the weather is marked by continues rainfall, combined from time to time
with hard winds, storms, hail, thunder and lightning. For the women these weather types are hard to
distinguish and their stories indicate thunder, hard winds and rain occur often at the same time. Hail
occurs less often, but the accounts vary from 1 to 2 times the whole season up to 20 days in a month,
with hailstones varying in size from 3 to 20 cm. In general women know what to expect from the
season, but they never know when exactly what to expect as they don’t have access to weather
forecasting or warning systems. Moreover most of their descriptions of the season do not include the
weather types and characteristics named here, but refer to a characterisation of life summarized as:
‘people cannot move, people cannot earn, people cannot eat’.
According to the women people cannot move during the rainy season due to the excessive rain
causing floods three times on average each year. In general it takes a couple of days for the water to
rise, and depending on the weather and the location it stays varying from a couple of days to a
month, to then disappear again until the next rain. The flood characteristics are thus very situational
and some women face one feet high water in their premises for 2 to 3 days, while others are not be
able to stay at home for two weeks or longer because the water level at their premises rises to 1
meter or more. The land near the river, and on the riverside of the ‘bhat’21 floods most severely, just
as the lower laying agricultural lands. One woman moved her house about 50 or 100 meters from the
riverside to the ‘baht’, showing the location specificity of flood. At this location she does not face any
problems with flood, while the old location of her house has been taken by the floods of last years.
Storms.
Storm or extreme winds are often mentioned as interfering with daily life during the rainy season
and outside of it. According to the women storms occur from summer through the rainy season and
last till autumn, with a peak in occurrence during the summer months Boishakh and Joishtho and the
rainy season. One of the women explains that “during the rainy season, the storm generally comes
every day. Sometimes little, sometimes bigger and it will stay all night, sometimes all day, sometimes
all night and day” 22.
20
Mst. Minuri (35 yrs), living with husband (retired) and 3 children in Kochukata 21
A ‘bhat’ is a heightened road that serves as protection against flooding rivers. It is comparable to the Dutch dykes. 22
Adida (25 yrs), living with her husband and 2 children in Khutiamara.
29
Although referred to as storms in this thesis, the women mention cyclones, tornadoes, storms or just
hard winds. A woman mentioned tornados and described it as ‘the wind that blows away the trees
from their roots’23. Others talk about ‘a rolling kind of wind’, ‘fast moving wind’, ‘wind coming from
one side and then from the other’, or ‘wind that starts moving from the ground’. Some of the women
view storms as a period of several weeks or months in which storms hit in periods from 1-2 hours to
a couple of days. Others however describe storms as events that last a couple of hours to a day and
may occur several times a week.
Women’s comments on the weather and the occurring hazards.
Looking back and comparing current rainy seasons with the past, over half of the women believe the
weather has become worse and the effects on life have increased. They argue the water stays longer
during the rainy season, its level is higher and the effects in terms of damage are bigger. Moreover
some specifically refer to the increase in hail and storm during the season, and one of them referred
to the increased cold and the fog in winter as sign of this change. Not all agree, and some think there
is less rain and water. One woman thought nowadays there is less rain and more storm and hail
during the rainy season, and in general it is believed the storms have increased in occurrence and
effects. Women say there are more storms, they last longer, are stronger and cause more problems
than they used to. Most women expect the trends they see in the weather and its (negative) effects
to continue in the future, not for the least because ‘[they] have no money to do anything about it’.
But there is also the believe that ‘it depends on the Almighty’.
5.2. Life in Toikorerpara and Uttar Toikorerpara.
On the western banks of the great and mighty Jamuna in the Gaibandha District of Bangladesh’s
Northern Rangpur Division, lies Sughatta Upazilla. It lies tucked away between the waters of the
kilometres broad breaded Brahmaputra-Jamuna river in the east and the much smaller Bangali river
in the west. The more you would travel east, the more your journey will continue on bhats, and
eventually you will end up in Haldia Union. The bhats are heightened roads that function as
embankments to protect against the water. Along the eastside of the main ‘bhat’ crossing from
north to south through Haldia Union you’ll see huge water basins dug. They are located at the side of
the Jamuna river and serve as water storage. Right now, in march, there is only a low level of water
left. In the rainy season however these meters deep basins of 30 by 150 meters or more flood to
eventually serve as storage as the water level has lowered again.
In between the main bhat and the one functioning as the last line of defence against the Jamuna
river lie Toikorerpara and Uttar (north) Toikorerpara. There is no market in these places, and neither
are there markets in the neighbouring villages of Bangerpara, Pabantair and Bera. Along the bhat
there are just a couple of small ‘tea hostels’24, a shop and some stalls where now and then meat or
vegetables are sold. The only transportation available here are vans. To find another place to buy
23
Monjura (35 yrs), widow, living with 2 children in Kochukata. 24
Tea hostels are like cafes. People, mostly men, go here during the day to drink tea and eat a quick snack, lunch or dinner.
30
food or to eat will take you with a 15 minute travel north in the direction to Saghatta city and it will
take you even longer to get to the nearest market place.
Daily life.
Daily life in Toikorerpara and Uttar Toikorerpara25 has many similarities with life in Kochukata,
Parakut and Khutiamara. The poor live a hand-to-mouth existence, and every day is about meeting
the daily needs of the family members. In male-headed households an income of 100-200 taka26 is
earned by day labour or van-pulling. If possible this is supported by women’s work on rented land,
growing vegetables or taking care of some animals. The lives of older women or those married with
an older man however isn’t structured anymore by their own work. A woman of around 35 years old
told: “My son is responsible for earning money. My husband does not work anymore. [My son] is a
farmer, working here. We don’t have our own land, we just work as labourer, hired. [...] Sometimes
people also hire me, [but] not related to agriculture [and] they pay me not money but only rice”27.
Only a few of the women earn some money or food through day labour in agriculture or
housekeeping. Most of them like the woman mentioned however depend on the income of the sons
they live with, or the remittances of the son(s) that left for work to one of Bangladesh’s megacities.
Those who are able combine it with renting land to grow crops, growing vegetables on vacant land or
taking care of animals and selling the eggs, milk or young animals. All women spoken to that have no
income from their husband have access to either land or animals to support their living. Nevertheless
some of them turn to begging in neighbouring villages or marketplaces in times of need, while others
rely on the goodness of their neighbours.
Problems and coping strategies in daily life.
Illustrative for the problems many women face in daily life is the following story of a woman from
Toikorerpara. She is living with her husband, 10-year old daughter and 7-year old son, and explained
to me her problems and how she dealt with it. She said: “The main problem is food. Because I am ill, I
have a pain in my back and my husband does not earn. He is mad28, and that is the main problem.
Sometimes the neighbours help us, but they also have not enough to eat. Sometimes we go to
another village to get some help. We beg. We ask [people]to give something because I am poor and
cannot earn. Then the people help. [...] I took [a loan of] 5000 taka from Grameen Bank and per week
pay 230. My husband was seriously ill, blood came from his mouth, that is why I took the loan. For my
husband’s disease and also to buy some food for the cow. I also used the money to buy food.”29
The above account on problems and coping represents the stories of many women. It is the daily
uncertainty for both income and food that worries the women and marks their daily lives. Their
25
From now on referred to as (Uttar) Toikorerpara, meaning both villages. 26
which equals € 0,96 - € 1,92 or $ 1,26 - $ 2,54 - Exchange rate of June 20, 2013, according to the calculator on http://www.wisselkoers.nl/ 27
Mst. Mojiton Begum (30+ yrs), living with husband (retired), 2 sons (1 is day labourer) and daughter-in-law in Toikorerpara. 28
This is how my translator translated what she said, but later when he used the word more often, he explained it meant old and unable to work. 29
Peari Begum (40 yrs), living with husband (retired) and 2 children in Toikorerpara.
31
stories however also show that older, ill or disabled husbands are part of this problem because they
can no longer provide for their family. Just as in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara it is hard to get
support from neighbours and family. Although often in a lesser degree, most of them are also poor
and not able to offer more than advice. To solve their problems some of the women who still have a
husband providing income, take a loan at a NGO. Many other women are not able to get one or do
not want it because they know they’re unable to pay the instalments. Some however get help from
the Food Security for Ultra Poor Women (FSUP) project30, which focuses on food security and
introduced the Heifer principle through which most of the participants got their own animals to
support their livelihood.
Natural events interfering with daily life.
During the time of my to Toikorerpara it is March, and half spring in Bangla called Bôshonto. The
roads and the land around Toikorerpara are dusty and dry and the ponds and water basins only
contain low levels of water. There is barely any wind and it rained only once the past weeks. That
evening for 1,5 hours the rain literally poured out of heaven, together with small hailstones,
combined with some gusts of wind. Nevertheless it is hard to imagine the stories women tell about
storms, rain and flood. For them the rainy season, especially its co-occurring floods, poses most
challenges to daily life. Here the events will be described as they did it. As becomes clear in the next
chapter, it is however the water that stays behind rather than the weather events giving it, that
causes problems and therefore dominates their stories. Moreover, also here counts that weather
aspects and effects are intertwined and inseparable in their stories on storms and floods.
Floods.
The weather during the rainy season is marked by rain, now and then accompanied by strong wind,
or even storm, thunder and hail. Sometimes it continues raining for long times, up to 5 or even 7
days, and women know they can expect floods whenever it starts raining and the water becomes
higher. On average there are 2-3 floods each year according to the women spoken to.
‘Simultaneously when there is rain there is flood’ 31, said one of them. Some women however
mention that they think the floods are not only caused by local rainfall, water also comes from the
Jamuna river. They describe it as ‘waves coming from the river’ and ‘water that is coming rapidly’
while ‘it makes a loud sound’, and although they believe flood is caused both by rainfall and from the
river, many say more water comes from the river.
The speed with which the water enters the premises and houses of people varies and the statement
‘sometimes the water rises in 1 day and sometimes in 3-4 days’, seems to cover most accounts. One
woman stated “when I sees the water outside the door and think what shall I do, with that thinking I
30
This is a joint initiative of seven local partners: Rangpur Dinajpur Rural Service (RDRS), Christian Commission for Development in Bangladesh (CCDB), Centre for Disability in Development (CDD), Leprosy Mission, Gram Bikash Kendra (GBK), Unnayan Shahojogy Team (UST), and Gana Unnayan Kendra (GUK), and two international partners: Stichting Dark & Light Blind Care (D&L), The Netherlands, and The Leprosy Mission (TLM), England and Wales and Channel Islands. 31
Mst. Momena Katum (50 yrs), widow, living with her in-laws in Uttar Toikorerpara
32
can see the water go inside”32, while another said “in the morning I see water is near the tubewell, in
the evening it is near our room, next day water is everywhere and in the evening I see the water [...]
at bed height”33. Depending on the flood and the amount of water, as well as the location, the final
height of the water varies from one feet in the premises of people’s houses to five feet inside, where
it will stay 3 days to a month. After it stops raining the water goes back to the river or disappears into
the ground. Overall it comes faster than it disappears.
Storms.
Storms occur during the rainy season, but are not merely a seasonal phenomenon and occur also in
its preceding months. Nevertheless they are most often mentioned in relation to the rainy season,
and talking about storms almost automatically brings the conversation back to the rainy season and
floods. The storms are described as lasting about 1 to 2 hours, and appear suddenly on no specific
time. The sky gets dark, the wind starts blowing fast and the rain is pouring down, sometimes with
hail or thunder. In comparison to floods the storms do not really pose big problems to life, although
they can make it difficult when trees break and houses collapse.
Women’s thoughts and expectations concerning the weather and the occurring hazards.
The weather and its effects, especially the floods, differ from situation to situation, from flood to
flood and from location to location. Some of the women in (Uttar) Toikorerpara say the situation is
the same as before, but most women have noticed changes in the floods of the past few years. They
say the floods have increased due to the changing course of the Jamuna river. The river has come
closer and aggravates the its occurrence and number. It has not always been the case that much of
the excessive water came from the river and caused more than 1 flood during the raining season. The
current floods come very rapidly, the water level is higher, it gets inside houses and many women
and their families have to move out. Some say this change is also due to a broken embankment 2 km
away that has not been repaired, although it broke a couple of years ago. The women say they face
lots of difficulties because of this and ‘they don’t have any peace now’34. They say the situation in the
future depends on water level of the Jamuna, but also that it will be what God provides.
5.3. A reflection on livelihoods and occurring hazards.
The phrase ‘living a hand-to-mouth existence’ captures the livelihoods of the poor women spoken to
in Kochukata, Parakut, Khutiamara and (Uttar) Toikorerpara well. They and their families have to
make a living from insecure sources of income, without fixed loans or labour contracts. Almost all
families eat what they earn and often face difficulties with food when earnings disappoint. Food is
most women’s main concern, but income insecurity also affects their ability to meet needs in
clothing, medicine and healthcare, education and the marriage of daughters. Many women take care
of animals like cows, goats, chickens or ducks or grow vegetables or crops to contribute to the
family’s income and food security. In case of real problems they ask neighbours for advice but often
32
Mst. Golapi Begum (40 yrs), living with husband (day labourer) and 3 children in Pabantair. 33
Roshida Begum (45 yrs), living with husband (retired) in Toikorerpara. 34
Morjina (60 yrs), widow, living alone in Uttar Toikorerpara
33
have to turn to informal or formal lending systems to solve their problems. It is not a lack of will to
help but rather a lack of assets and resources to help each other, just as it is the cause of many
problems.
The internal side of vulnerability is closely related to people’s livelihoods and their ability to arrange
and use the resources they need in normal times and in times of hazards. The livelihoods of the
women described here often lack resources to meet needs even in normal times, and leave no room
to buy themselves protection against hazards. A situation that is common also for neighbours and
family. The relations of households, that in theory become very important in times of hazard, are
likely to be insufficient to provide access to resources needed. This suggests their livelihoods and
relations only provide a thin layer of (self) protection, unlikely to absorb much of the impacts of
hazards. Depending on the magnitude and scale of the hazard, it is likely only small impacts can be
absorbed by the household itself.
In Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara moderate levels of flood in the rainy season and severe winds
interfere with daily life, and in (Uttar) Toikorerpara it are mostly the relative high water levels. These
are not exactly the hazards that impact life in such a way that the 7 key characteristics of a disaster
are met that Frerks and his colleagues distinguished, but rather events that pose a threat to the
already uncertain livelihood of many families. It seems the situation of the women spoken to reflects
unsafe conditions because of low and insecure income and regularly occurring threatening weather.
A situation that furthermore seems aggravated by a lack of household assets or access to resources
through the families’ relations. Whether however this is true, and what kind of self and social
protection is present or can be arranged when hazards occur, will be discussed hereafter. The next
chapters will tell the story of life during and after the rainy season and storms, and will look in further
detail to people’s response, keeping in mind people’s belief that the future is in the hands of the
Almighty.
34
6. LIFE DURING RAIN AND STORMS
Almost all women at both locations mention the rainy season with its extreme weather, especially
excessive water and storms as most problematic natural events interfering with their daily life. Daily
life changes as the water rises and it becomes more difficult and dangerous to move from place to
place. This chapter will illustrate this by telling about their lives during these events. First life during
moderate floods will be described, as it represents the stories of many women in Kochukata, Parakut
and Khutiamara. It is the story of those able to stay at home during the floods. Thereafter life during
floods of higher level and longer duration will be described, as it represents the stories of many
women in (Uttar) Toikorerpara or living near a river. They are not able to stay at home, but have to
take shelter elsewhere. Finally life during storms will be described because most women at both
locations face storms regularly. The chapter will conclude with a reflection of life during these
hazards, focussing on the effects on people’s livelihoods and their capacity to deal with the situation.
6.1. Life during moderate floods.
“In the rainy season the water comes in here. One feet, and it stays only three or four days. When the
water comes I am afraid about our children, because when they fall down the water they cannot
swim. […]
During the rainy season if we face the problem we cannot earn, then we cannot eat. If we can earn
then we can buy food. During the rainy season, generally when it is flooded, we have the problem
with food because it is not available. When I cannot arrange food for the children we go to the
neighbour for the food of our children. We eat less. Now we eat three times on a day, full, but during
the rainy season we eat less, 1 time or 2 times, and with less food. Now the price of rice is 25, but
during the rainy season it will be 32, 33 or more. I cannot make it sometimes, we cannot arrange the
rice, that is why. Vegetables are available, but the prices are high. During the rainy season we buy
less vegetables. We didn’t store [food] because what my man earns, we need for one day” (Asatum,
Parakut) 35.
The story of Asatum is illustrative for the situation of many women during the rainy season. The well-
being of children and the availability of food are their main concerns. To arrange food they can no
longer depend on the income they used to depend on. Day labour is often impossible as the
agricultural fields are under water and riding a van becomes dangerous. Life, especially meeting the
need of food, is no longer secure, but rather uncertain and food prices increase as income decreases.
What makes it even more difficult is the challenge to cook. Firewood is wet, and the outdoor cookers
are flooded. If the water level allows it, some women try to get the water out of the cooker and dry it
with ashes. Others cook at neighbours’ special on plinth raised cooking rooms with roofs, or use
bricks, chairs and tins to create a cooking place inside their house. If they have enough food some
women try to cook for two meals at once. Rice is the main and often only type of food during floods,
because food prices rise, and it is the cheapest food available. Meals are often reduced to once a day
and sometimes adults don’t eat at all. Trimoti Nero Bala explains “if we cannot cook, we try to buy
35
Asatum (22 yrs), living with husband (van puller) 2 children in Parakut.
35
something from the shop and feed our children. I didn’t eat sometimes, but only fed the children”36.
As Asatum story shows, it happens adults don’t eat for 1 or 2 days, to make sure their children have
something to eat.
Many men migrate during the rainy season to cities like Dhaka, Saidpur or Chittagong to earn money.
Most women however do not leave the village, and their lives become limited to their own home and
some of the neighboring houses. During the day they cook if it is possible, do their chores as far as
the rain and the flood allow, gather food for the animals, and gossip with each other, although at
times that can get boring. They face the challenge to meet their family’s needs, and inconveniences
like leaking roofs, a soggy mud floor and the threat of more damage form hail and storms that occur
during the season. Batashi Begum, although her husband doesn’t leave, notices life is different when
many of the men are gone. Those women staying behind wait for remittances, meanwhile depending
more heavily on especially each other to meet daily needs. Although some are ashamed to do it,
many women borrow both food and money from each other and the rich to be able to feed their
children37.
One woman’s description of daily life when the water comes inside the house very well captured the
stories of many. She said: “We are trying to sit down on the bed. Not only we, also the animals. We
keep all our things together and we keep it in the roof of our house. The roof is empty, there is
bamboo, over there we put it. [It is called] ‘kif’ “38.
Almost all women spoken to in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara, tell stories identical to this one.
Most families spend their time inside their house, together with their animals. The ducks and
chickens they keep in self-made baskets, and also the goats and cows are kept in the room. When
the water comes inside they put their belongings on bamboo mats under the roof of the house, a
place they call ‘kif’, and continue life on their bed(s), together with their animals. For some, mostly
those living near a river, the water however rises too high to stay at home. They move out.
6.2. Life during floods of higher level and longer duration.
“To protect my family, me and my family go to the road and take shelter there. We take shelter in
other people’s house on the other side. On this side there is water, on the other side there is no water.
The road is like a ‘bhat’. […] I didn’t take any prevention for the flood damage to my house. I only
protect my family. We go to [the bhat]. When the water comes, and I can see the water reaching, I
call other people and take the house in another place. Only the roof. To protect [it] from the flood.
Everything I take to other people’s house. When the water comes, in an instance I take everything to
the other’s house. I make a boat from the banana tree, and our things I keep in there and I take it.
[The boat], it is called ‘bura’. Everything I take in the ‘bura’, also the children” (Shada Rani, Parakut)39.
36
Trimote Nero Bala (24 yrs), living with her husband (van puller), mother-in-law and 3 children in Khutiamara. 37
Batashi Begum (25 yrs), living with husband (renting a tea hostel), his other wife and their 2 children in Parakut 38
Lisu (35 yrs), living with husband (river fisher) and 3 children in Parakut. 39
Shada Rani (35 yrs), living with husband (day labourer) and 5 children in Parakut.
36
Differing much from Asati’s story, Shada Rani’s story is less representive for the women spoken to in
Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara. Only the houses of those living near the river, unprotected by
any embankment or ‘bhat’, get under water completely and become unliveable. A situation which
has more resemblances with the situation of women in (Uttar) Toikorerpara. But also here, people’s
houses are their first shelter, and they stay at home as long as the water levels permit. During the
days children often play and make the best of the situation enjoying the water, while mothers try to
keep them out. The women spend their time tailoring or gossiping with other women, they cannot
work and neither can the men. When the water rises to levels too high to live with the family on
beds, many women arrange places for their children and older husbands to stay.
Roshida Begum explains what her live looks like when the family has to move: “I send my son-in-law
to my father’s house. For the safety of my grandchild I send them to my father’s house, with the goat
and chicken and everything. I stay in the room with one bed put on another bed.[…] I send my
husband to the main road, it is high. Only I stay [here]. Sometimes my husband stays with relatives
and sometimes alone. When he lives alone on the embankment we make a small house, with roof and
in there he lives with the animals. […] In daytime I use to go to the embankment and also cut some
tree leaves for the animals. Sometimes I cook there, sometimes I cook here. If I cook here, I cook with
the ‘alop tula’40 and cook for two persons. I take food for my husband over there. Last year I went
there with the banana boat, but it is difficult to go there. […] In the evening I come back and go to bed
and open the window to see if any robber comes”41.
Sometimes the women and their family members staying at the house, sleep in the water sitting
upright with their heads against the wall. Others decide to take their bed sheets, pillows, food and
cooking materials, lock their house and join their family, friends and neighbours at the embankment
until the water level drops.
With high water levels, food even becomes a bigger problem than with moderate water levels.
Besides the lack of income and increased food prices, high water makes it difficult to visit the market
to buy food. Moreover because of the changed nature of floods in (Uttar) Toikorerpara, the last
harvest of rice before the rainy season failed and people, even the rich, have not been able to store
rice. Some do have dried and flattened rice stored, but many families haven’t and to arrange food
most women borrow money from richer neighbours. Others beg for money or rice, or depend on the
gifts of others. Parents eat less and give their children the bigger shares. There is often only enough
food for one meal a day. A young women, left by her husband, but taking care of their 2 children
says: “If I get half a kg of rice, I cook a quarter and keep a quarter for later. I eat little and keep more
for the children”42.
Arranging food is also more difficult because most cookers are built on the ground and useless during
the floods. Like Roshida Begum, many women therefore make ‘alop tulas’ from clay, which can be
moved. During floods they place them on a high table, which they call ‘toki’, and they cook on the
bed. An additional problem however is the firewood. Some women have thought of storing some in
the high places of their house, but not all. And although people are willing to share their cooking
areas, sharing dry wood is not very common. Since most people only have rice or potatoes, not being
able to cook means they cannot eat.
40
A small portable cooker/stove 41
Roshida Begum (45 yrs), living with husband (retired) in Toikorerpara. 42
Pomeshar Moyna Rani (35 yrs), left by her husband, living with 2 children in Uttar Toikorerpara.
37
Luckily safe drinking water is no problem for any of the women spoken to. Even on the embankment,
away from their own home water from the tubewells on the west side of the road is freely available.
Sanitation however is much scarcer. During the rainy season this lack causes real problems. When
the women have to go to the bathroom they use the ‘bura’ to get away from the house as far as is
reasonably possible, and do it far off. They do however feel the flood and lack of sanitation threatens
their health and that of the children. Even more so because people cannot bury their death relatives
and animals that have died during the flood. They send them away on ‘buras’. Because of this and
excessive water all the time people, especially children, get diarrhoea or dysentery. When they face
diarrhoea, people threat themselves with ORS, which they call saline and buy at the pharmacy. For
other diseases however they have to go to a clinic, or even the hospital, but not always they are able
as hospitals are farther away and transportation limited during the rainy season.
6.3. Daily life interfered by storm, thunder and hail .
Hard winds, thunder and hail often co-occur with rain in the rainy season, but also occur outside the
rainy season. Whether it occurs during the rainy season or not, most women react by stopping their
daily activities, take some precautions and then make sure the family and animals gets safe inside. In
case of hard wind, they start with strutting the house with as many bamboo beams that serve as
emergency braces as possible. In Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara they call them ‘teckna’, and in
(Uttar) Toikorerpar ‘doka’ (pictures 4 and 5). But many know the these will not be enough to protect
their house against a severe storm. A women from Kochukata said: “I try to protect my house with
bamboo, but I feel it will still blow up sometimes”43.
Not all women therefore take shelter in their own house but in the strongest house nearby, while
others stay under their bed out of fear. People stay at their chosen shelter until the storm is over two
hours or sometimes a day later. This does not necessarily mean inside, as one woman told: “All my
family members go to a place where there is nothing, no trees, nothing. Because when a tree breaks
43
Monjura (35 yrs), widow, living with 2 children in Kochukata.
Picture 4 and 5: construction and use of teckna /doka
38
down we can get injured, that’s why we go to a place where there is nothing. And if we die, we’ll die
all at the same time”44.
Hailstones can be very big, making lots of noise on the tin roofs of houses, and causing damage to
both houses, trees and crops. People fear the hail and thunder and children get upset by the noise.
Women who use to cook outside are afraid to go out and don’t cook, or cook inside if that is possible.
Some however try to cook in advance, just as a woman from Kochukata: “normally if I see the clouds
turn black I try to cook early and try to get the food inside”45.
Storms, especially with hail and thunder scare the women and fear keeps them and their husbands
inside so they cannot earn, but the effect on everyday life is nowhere near that of the rainy season.
6.4. A reflection on life during hazards.
During floods and storms the problems with income and food women and their families face in daily
life are magnified. When the water level rises or storms rage people cannot move much, cannot
work, do not earn and cannot buy food. A problem more easily dealt with during and after storms
than floods, but both situations show the susceptibility of the poor to suffer from food shortage.
There are not many self-protection measures taken in advance to avoid this problem, and during
floods the poor rely heavily on others for food and money. Their relations provide them access to
resources needed to meet their family’s needs. Especially women whose husbands have migrated for
work, depend heavily on each other, but for all relations become a main source of protection against
enfolding hazard impacts. During the occurrence of floods or storms there are no social protection
measures people rely on. Coping and response are embedded in their livelihoods and relations, as
the access to resources needed during hazards come from everyday life.
Life during floods and storms focusses on the wellbeing of the family. Most efforts are put in
arranging food and safety, and just as for food people often also rely on others for shelter. Living
with the water however seems to be normal and accepted, and little to no measures are taken to
keep the water out of the house. To protect the house during storms, people do however take
measures and prepare in advance. Moreover they have developed strategies to keep their
belongings and animals safe and dry during floods. It seems they have found effective ways to cope.
Whether it is sufficient, will become more clear in the next chapters on the unfolding impacts of
hazards, and amongst other things, the needs women still have to deal with the risk and threats
coming from the hazards they face. These chapters will illustrate more of the women’s vulnerabilities
and their response to impacts on both the short and longer term.
44
Lisu (35 yrs), living with husband (river fisher) and 3 children in Parakut. 45
Komola (20 yrs) living with daughter in Kochukata. Husband is rickshawpuller in Dhaka.
39
7. UNFOLDING IMPACTS
Even when floods and storms have passed, they can still affect life. Hazards can result in both
primary and secondary effects (Wisner & Adams, 2002), and response also includes actions taken
after hazards to overcome its impacts (Birkmann et al, 2013; Del Ninno et al, 2001; Lein, 2009; Paul &
Routray, 2010, 2011; Wisner & Adams, 2002). With every action people take they change the
conditions in and with which they have to live. This is not only true for life during hazards, as
discussed in the former chapter, but also for life directly after it and in the longer run. In order to
gain a complete understanding of women’s strategies to deal with the effects of natural hazards,
including recovery and response to secondary effects, this chapter will outline the threats and
problems experienced by them from the onset of the hazards onwards. It is a short intermezzo to
clarify how hazards affect different aspects of life. How women deal with problems they face after
the actual hazards will be discussed in the next chapter on life after the hazards.
7.1. Human lives and safety
Many women fear storms and the rainy season for the threat to their lives and that of their family,
especially their children. They often know stories about people who died because of floods or
storms, but the stories concern hearsay and some go back ten years. Overall, of all the natural
hazards they face throughout the year, storms are most lethal. It was thunder lightening, collapsing
houses or breaking trees that killed people, but ‘during storm usually people do not die but get
injured’46. There was however also a woman who told about a storm 3 years ago by which 100-150
people got killed due to thunder lightening and diseases afterwards47. The event however did not
come back in other interviews and a check of newspaper articles did not confirm the story.
Newspaper articles however do confirm fatalities during storms, both tornados and nor’westers48
and together with the stories of women, they show the fear for lives is realistic.
Two women I spoke to lost a child during the rainy season. One was four years old and drowned and
the other got ill. Although the floods and storms do not lead to many fatalities, people get injured
and floods and diseases are closely related. Children, but also adults, get diarrhoea and dysentery.
This has not to do with a lack of safe drinking water, as everyone has access to tube wells, both at
home or where they take shelter during floods or storms. Sanitation however is a problem, especially
during floods. Most poor women don’t have any latrine let alone a raised and flood resilient one, and
during floods they ‘use the boat and go far to do it’. Women know this lack of sufficient sanitation
increases the risk of waterborne diseases. Peari Begum explains: “During the flood season the bad
water comes, sometimes many animals die in the water. Mainly for the water people are ill” 49.
In case of disease health care or medicines have to be arranged, but that is not always easy. Peari
Begum’s story about how she lost her son, during a flood, says: “my older one died for the flood. For
46
Adida (25 yrs), living with husband (betel leave seller) and 2 children in Khutiamara. 47
Nasima Atar (46 yrs), living with her husband (day laborer) in Khutiamara. 48
Nor’westers called Kal-Baishakhi in Bangla, are severe thunderstorms accompanied with strong winds that occur mainly during the Bengal summer, in the month Boîshakh 49
Peari Begum (40 yrs), living with husband (retired) and 2 children in Toikorerpara.
40
the flood we could not arrange food, that is why he died. […]. I get some medicine from the clinic, but
it was not enough, but for more I need to go to the hospital”.
7.2. Damage to houses and belongings
The houses of the poor are placed on a raised plinth made of mud. Among the houses I’ve seen there
is no exception, although some plinths are higher than others and some have vegetation to protect it
from being washed away. The houses itself have a frame constructed from either bamboo or wood,
of which the pillars are entrenched in the mud floor. On top of the pillars are beams, and on top of
that rests the frame of the pitched roof. The walls are made of reed, jute or bamboo matting, or
corrugated tin attached to the frame with wire, bolts or straw-like rope. The roof is made from the
same kind of materials, although there is high percentage of corrugated tin roofs. Compared to
Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara, where most poor live in bamboo, reed or jute houses, (Uttar)
Toikorerpara has more houses made of tin.
Many women say the poor construction of their houses, especially the lack of robustness of the
pillars, is a major problem, and most have experienced at least once damage to their house in times
of storms or floods. Storms are feared most, as houses can be smashed by hard blows of wind, trees
might fall down and damage the house, and even the complete house or its roofs might be blown
away. Women living at the edge of villages next to open field, fear most because there are no other
houses that break the wind before it gets to their house. Not only women living at these locations
mentioned this, but also during the group discussion held in Kochukata, women explained that those
living at the edge of the village are more likely to suffer damage to their house from storms.
In (Uttar) Toikorerpara women also fear much for damage from floods. They face higher levels of
water, just like those living in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara at the river side of the
embankment. The longer the water stays and the higher it gets, the more likely damage to the walls,
pillars and floor of the house. Reed, jute and bamboo walls as well as pillars get rotten by the
excessive water, and tin walls bend and get affected. Moreover moderate floods already damage the
houses’ plinths of mud and plain rain may cause damage to the reed, jute and bamboo walls,
especially when there is a hard wind blowing. Rain combined with hail can furthermore damage the
tin roofs, causing bumps and sometimes even holes in the tin. Whatever the cause however, after
the actual occurrence of the event, the damage to houses poses real challenges to the lives of
women and their families.
Despite to the damage to houses, household items are barely mentioned as being damaged by
natural hazards. One of the women told she has no special things, giving the shortest and clearest
explanation possible for the reason why so little is said about these things. Things you don’t have
can’t be threatened. When water gets inside during floods the few belongings people have do
nevertheless often get wet and damaged . Only one woman faced problems from the storm with one
of the household’s assets. Her family once took a loan to buy a van, and she is the only woman
whose family owns its productive asset with which they earn their income. Last year a storm had
blown the van, that was kept outside, away. The van was damaged severely and the cost for
41
reparation was around 3000 taka. In general damage to belongings does not concern such big
amounts of money or influence people’s income in such degrees.
7.3. Income and food security.
As became clear in the former chapter, hazards directly interfere with the poor’s daily practice of
working for an income. The whole rainy season it is almost impossible to find work, and in times of
regular storms and bad weather men sometimes cannot work for a week. The effects of both floods
and storms on employment and earnings can however be longer than the hazard itself. A woman
from Kochukata, mother of four and the main provider of her family, told about finding work after
rain or storms: “After the rain sometimes I can get work and sometimes I cannot. It takes a week to a
month to get a job. [After a storm] it takes 15 days to a month to two months to get a job, because
the field gets destructed […] and it takes time”50.
Not finding work directly after the rainy season is a common problem, often ascribed to the floods
and ‘monga’51, both related to agriculture and the sowing calendar. Not finding work after a storm
however is only partly explained by the woman’s argument of destructed fields or damage to other
assets needed to earn money. It is also fear, as becomes clear from the following account of a
woman from Parakut: “for the storm we suffer for food. We cannot work, that is why we have the
problem. My children are little and I take care of them. That is why I cannot work in other’s house and
during a storm my husband can also not work. A storm stays 1-2 hours a day, but for the storm me
and my husband cannot do work for 4 or 5 days. When a storm occur people fear when it will come
again”52.
Having no work and no income is a direct threat coming from natural hazards, and as long as
difficulties with employment exist, the problems with arranging enough food for the family
continues. A widow in Uttar Toikorerpara told: “During the flood season the food price becomes
higher and only when they can harvest rice it will be lower. After the rain or flood, when it is less, I
face a lot of problems with food and clothes and everything because there is no work. I cannot earn
and sometimes I starve for food”53.
Problems with food also arise or even increase when storms or hail destroy agricultural fields and
lead to crop failure. Then it is likely there is a combination of no work, food shortage on a bigger
scale and increased food prices.
50
Mst. Minuri (35 yrs), living with husband (retired) and 3 children in Kochukata. 51
“Monga is a Bangla word that has been derived from “Mehenga” meaning “expensive” which indicates high food price, consequent poverty and hunger. Generally, the term monga is used to describe a nearfamine like situation, and is also an indicator of seasonal food shortage which prevails in some northern districts of Bangladesh” (Ahamad, Khondker, Ahmed & Tanin, 2013: 1078) 52
Shada Rani (35 yrs), living with husband (day labourer) and 5 children in Parakut. 53
Mst. Rina Begum (45 yrs), living with her son's family in Uttar Toikorerpara.
42
7.4. Poultry, livestock, crops, vegetables and fruit trees.
About half of the women own or take care of animals. They regard natural hazards as threats to their
animals, as floods can cause diseases and storms can cause injuries, and they fear for their well-
being. Only a few however mention real problems with the well-being of their animals. A problem
mentioned in the interviews is the difficulty some have with feeding their animals, as less food is
available during floods, and it becomes more expensive to take care of. Moreover one woman said:
“After the flood people became ill, sometimes diarrhoea or cholera, that kind of disease. And also the
cow, they have lots of problems, because after the flood they eat grass, but the grass is no good, that
is why they get ill”54.
The threats posed by natural hazards to the crops, vegetables and fruit trees people grow is more
often materialized than the threats to animals. Storms break trees, which furthermore can damage
vegetables and crops, and fields can be destroyed or crops damaged by wind or hail. Moreover hail
damages the fruit growing on trees, and lightening might even destroy whole trees. A more
structural and recurrent problem in (Uttar) Toikorerpara however are the floods in the rainy season
which make it impossible to grow anything. Although the women say this is usual, increased
variability and unpredictability of the first flood, also poses new problems when the last paddy grown
before the rainy season cannot be harvested.
7.5. A reflection on unfolding impacts of floods and storms on life and
livelihoods.
As shown in the former chapter and confirmed in this one, women are mainly concerned with their
own safety, that of family members, and with the availability of food during floods and storms. There
does however seems to be a network of connections between these and the impact of hazards on
the categories discussed above. The availability of food is closely linked to the ability to work, and
there are also links between threats to human lives and the safety of houses. Life during the floods
and storms shows people’s priorities and how they cope with threats. This chapter shows it does not
end there, as challenges with income and food are likely to remain, while other challenges emerge.
People may have to face damaged houses, fields and vegetable gardens, as well as illness, injuries
and sick animals. The question is whether these can be solved the same way as challenges were
solved during the hazards. How people deal with the impacts after the actual hazards, whether they
choose to rely again on their relations or decide otherwise, as well as how they continue their lives
will be discussed in the next chapter.
54
Mst. Rina Begum (45 yrs), living with her son's family in Uttar Toikorerpara
43
8. LIFE AFTER THE RAINY SEASON AND STORMS
This chapter describes the lives of the women after the actual hazard, in what can be called the
period of recovery. It discusses the direct impact of the rainy season and storms on life, as well as the
actions taken to overcome these, to secure income and reduce further risks. The chapter will follow
the women’s stories of life after rainy seasons and storms. The chapter will end with a reflection on
the stories using the theory on vulnerability and capacity. Specifically will be reflected on whether
the stories tell something about how both unfold and change, through mutual influence and in
reaction on people’s actions to protect themselves and recover.
8.1. Picking up life after individual floods and the whole rainy seasons.
After the water from the last flood in the rainy season has left, people’s premises, fields and villages
look desolate. Crops and land are damaged and depending on the water level, houses are damaged
too as is true for those living at the riverside of the bhat in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara and
most poor women in (Uttar) Toikorerpara. Those who left to take shelter during the flood come
home to see their walls and doors damaged, their mud floors scattered and their belongings wet and
starting to rot. Entering their house they find their legs stuck in the mud, and it is hard to move. The
water has gone, but has left behind a muddy mess for many. Minu, widow and living next to her son,
tells: “After the flood usually first I try to repair my house. Then I do other things. Last time, inside my
house, to dry it, it took 5 or 6 days, and to repair everything it took about 10 days. After the flood, my
son goes outside to work, and when he comes in the evening, or before going to work in the morning,
he helps me to repair it. After the flood he also helps me much with food”55.
Illustrating however that live is interrupted by more than the damage to personal belongings is what
Roshida Begum tells: “Nowadays life is good, but after the flood life became worse than life during
the flood time. Because for the flood time we have food, but after the flood time we didn’t get any
food. That is why life is worse. […] [People] sometimes sell their tree, sometimes sell the land, or sell
the cow, that is how they get money. But those people who don’t have any tree, cow, land, they have
nothing there, so that is worse life. […] After the flood first I try to repair my house and it takes
sometimes 15 to 20 days to repair my house, […] and after that I try to find work from other’s people
house. For if I can work, I can eat. In a day 1 time or 2 times, it depends on what I can do”56.
Just like described above, it takes most families between 10 and 20 days to repair their house after a
flood. The very first thing women do when the water level has dropped far enough, is taking all
belongings outside to dry. The mud that is left from the scattered floor they leave to dry, while new
mud is collected to restore the floor as soon as possible. When tin walls are damaged by the water
people take them out to repair, unbend and clean it. Most people do as much of the work
themselves. Because the women cannot do the work alone they do it with their husbands, before
and after he has worked, until everything is done. Screws, bamboo, tin, and even the mud when they
55
Minu (50 yrs), widow, living with her son's family in Uttar Toikorerpara 56
Roshida Begum (45 yrs), living with husband (retired) in Toikorerpara.
44
don’t have access to land, are bought with money that must be spared from the daily income or has
been borrowed from other people. Widows, those who are left behind or have aged husbands that
cannot do the work, have to rely on their sons, or the kindness of neighbours and rich people. But
people do not help each other much, as most people are poor and busy with their own problems.
Besides the damage that has to be repaired, many poor families face a debt after the rainy season.
Few people take a loan specifically to overcome the impacts of floods, but many have borrowed and
do borrow money to buy food. Private loans are high interested. People have to work hard to pay it
back, and some work extra for a period up to 6 months. What makes it more difficult however is that
it is hard to get work after the rainy season. Regardless the location and height of the floods, women
say the difficulty to find work after the rainy season is causing most problems. For women working in
other households, work depends on whether or not these households have anything to spend. A
woman explains: “Sometime after the flood people can harvest some crops. And if people can
harvest, then I can work and earn some paddy from the home. Last year people could not get
anything from the field and I suffered more. After the flood, if the people can harvest, I have the work,
otherwise I cannot get work during the flood time or after the flood time”57.
After the rainy season there are no crops in the field, nothing can be harvested and many men are
without work right after the flood. Those who can work, who have a van, work at brick factories or
migrate for work, tend to work hard to compensate. If they cannot work, they cannot earn money
and cannot buy food or other things they need, nor repay their debts or reparation costs. Some sell
their assets, like fruit trees, land, livestock or poultry to get money. Those who have nothing cannot
sell, so they turn to begging, and almost everyone eats less either because they have not enough
money to buy more, or they tend sell on the left-over rice, or simply to spare money. When more
work in agriculture comes available life slowly turns back to normal and problems reduce as income
becomes more secure.
8.2. Picking up life after storms.
Lisuu is a 35 year old woman living with her husband, 2 daughters and 1 son. Her husband is a river
fisher and they live from his income of 100 to 150 taka a day. Occasionally Lisu works in other
people’s houses and complements the family’s income with a small amount of money or rice. The
family’s main problem is money, as only 1 person earns an income and that is not enough for the
family’s daily needs and the children’s education. The problem becomes more evident when a storm
causes damage to the house. She tells: “my house was damaged by the storm. The pillar got
damaged and that is why the roof also fell down. I had no money, so I took a loan from the NGO. They
gave me 1000 taka and I made it. I did not have enough money to make it stronger to protect the
house”58.
Besides repairing the damage to houses, women have two major concerns after storms: food and
work. During the storm their families had no income and faced problems with getting and preparing
57
Mst. Rina Begum (45 yrs), living with her son's family in Uttar Toikorerpara 58
Lisu (35 yrs), living with husband (river fisher) and 3 children in Parakut.
45
food. Those who lacked food therefore go out to arrange food or earn money first, for if they can
earn they can eat. As before, life after a storm is about providing in the needs of the family. Damage
however poses new challenges to do this. People have to live with the damage, as they think about
ways to overcome it, and they furthermore have to repair the damage. Like Lisu many women in
Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara take loans to cover the costs. Others however choose to sell
their livestock or poultry, or as many of the poor women in (Uttar) Toikorerpara depend on the
goodness of their neighbours and family. Many also try to save money by working more and
spending less. Even some women who are not used to working, work for a couple of weeks to
overcome the extra costs. For days or even weeks daily life consist of combining hard work with
repairing homes and lending a hand to neighbours or family.
The hard work and borrowed money help most, but not all of the poor to rebuild their house, but like
Lisu often not enough for improvement, leaving many women in fear damage might happen again.
Only a few manage to get some extra pillars or replace the bamboo walls by tin, and one woman
thinks about how to get an extra loan to improve her house. Overall for many poor, storms affect
daily routines and life directly after it, but also in the long term, as instalments have to be paid.
Moreover it should be kept in mind both the direct and indirect effects often interfere with effects
from the rainy season, and cannot really be separated from these.
8.3. A reflection on the impact of hazards on life after their occurrence .
After the rainy season and certain storms, people face many similar problems, although it is quite
certain the problems after the rainy season are more severe and women also indicate it has more
prolonged effects on their income. In general people face damage to their houses, food shortage,
debts and they have difficulties finding work. Many prioritize the repair of their house and do most of
the work themselves, sometimes with the help of their neighbours and family. However, they also
need to work and earn money to buy food and pay off their debts of borrowing during the floods.
This is often difficult, so they eat less out of necessity or to save money, sell some of their assets or
choose to borrow more money. The stories the women tell make clear it is hard, but step by step
people overcome the impacts of the floods and storms, and return to normal life as through time
work becomes available and income more secure.
Yet, the overcoming of impacts does not seem sufficient when looking closer at the problems women
mention and how they cope with them. Work, and working hard and more, is one of the prominent
coping strategies among the poor, but because of the difficulties with finding a job this strategy
rather aggravates than solve the problems arising from hazards. Lack of income is compensated by
eating less, while food is already a problem; borrowing more money, while many already have debts
and difficulties repaying it; or selling assets, while these are often needed to complement the
nutrition intake or supply a small but steady source of income. The chosen and available strategies to
overcome the impacts of hazards may solve the problems for a day, but makes them, or rather keeps
them, susceptible for hunger, debts and shortages of all kind. As the threats and direct impacts of
flood and storms disappear through time, the vulnerability of the poor in everyday life and in cases of
new floods and storms, remains. Besides loans outside assistance and social protection seem to be
46
lacking, both in everyday life as in hazardous times. The influence of what is there and what is
lacking, as told by the women, will be discussed in the next chapter.
47
9. SOCIAL PROTECTION AND WOMEN’S NEEDS AND WANTS
Actions taken by entities larger than the household, such as the GoB, GOs, (i)NGOs and community
organisations, are part of people’s social protection against hazards. They can also contribute to
vulnerability, but however they turn out, they do make part of the context in which people act. Social
protection influences their vulnerability and capacity as well as their decision making about dealing
with the hazards they face. At local level the Union Parishad (UP) represents the GoB through the
Union Disaster Management Committee (UDMC) in its responsibility for DRR and emergency
response. The committee is chaired by the UP chairman, and its members are representatives from
different groups and organisations, including NGOs, in society. At the research locations UP
headquarters are centrally located in Kachukata Hat, Tangomari Hat and Haldia. For administrative
issues, and support people have to visit the UP headquarters. NGO offices are also often found at
these centrally located places, but through field offices and field workers their presences is more
visible also in smaller villages. In fact, it is hard to travel through any village or ward without passing a
sign announcing a NGO’s project or field office.
Following the stories of the women, here the activities of the Government of Bangladesh and
projects of NGOs at the research locations will be discussed. Additionally the issue of private
borrowings, loans and micro-credits will be addressed as it covers much of the (i)NGO projects at the
research locations and is well-known to the women. Thereafter the needs and wants they identify to
be better able to deal with hazards will be discussed. The chapter will conclude with a reflection on
the relation between the ‘protective actions carried out by larger entities’ and women’s social
protection as well as their vulnerability, capacity to act and influence on decision making.
9.1. Government support.
Government support in times of natural hazards is a sensitive issue, and even my translators got
nervous sometimes by discussing it. Illustrative for this is the interview I had with Dilera Katum in
Khutiamara. As she tells me she thinks the government is responsible for helping the people during
the rainy season, but actually does nothing, she starts laughing nervously. As I ask why the
government doesn’t do anything she keeps silent, but bystanders and also my translator laugh a little
and talk secretively with each other. Then one of them tells me they don’t get help because the
government is not interested in poor people. A point of view shared by many women, among whom
Roshida Begum. She is very open about support from the government. When she tells me the
government provides help, but the UP chairman did not provide it to the poor, a bystander gets
really angry and starts yelling at her. The information she is giving me should not be told and is not
my business. But as I fear this might bring Shimoti in trouble, she says she only tells the truth and is
not afraid for consequences. She continues and says the poor in Bangladesh do not get anything but
the powerful take it all, and her view is shared by those joining the interview.
According to some women the government is well aware of their difficulties with natural hazards.
“The government knows it because during the election generally people come and work and say we
48
will help you during the flood, but after the election they didn’t do it”59. Moreover members come by
and make promises, but in both cases nothing actually happens, and many women do no longer
expect anything from them. Occasionally during the rainy season however, rice is made available by
the government to be distributed by the UP among the ultra-poor. Most of the women did not get
any support at all, but some did get rice. They say it was because they are ultra-poor and asked a UP
member personally for help. Those who didn’t get any say it was because the UP members and
chairman favour the people they know, or ask money in return for help. The general view of the
women is that most of the rice goes to those in power and is not distributed properly. Some however
believe there is simply not enough for all the poor people. Some still trust the members that
promised they will get it next time rice is made available.
9.2. Projects by NGOs.
About two-third of the 31 women interviewed were at that time involved with a NGO. Of them 7
were involved in a food security project for poor women. The other 12 were involved in micro-
finance, loans or saving schemes, which are individual arrangements with NGOs. Most women do not
see micro-finance as being involved in a NGO, and thus despite the high involvement with NGOs
most women denied being helped by NGOs or involved in projects. Mst. Minuri from Kochukata tells:
“Other people are getting but she is not getting. She got to the NGO to get support, but they just told
her ‘we only give you 1 time’. Her neighbours got goat, chicken from NGOs but she could not get
anything. [Why not?] It depends on the NGO. They have listed her name, maybe she will get, maybe
not. They already told her she will be given one time”60.
It happens often the women see other people get help, while they don’t get any. They don’t know
why, but in general they also do not know much about NGOs nor understand how they work. They
expect help when someone writes down their names and can only hope they will actually get it.
In case of help from NGOs to deal with the impact of natural hazards, only one woman remembered
being helped 10 or 12 years ago. In Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara NGOs are mainly seen as
providers of micro-credit. According to the women NGOs do not have any attention to the floods or
the storms. They talk about loans and money and teach about how to do business and to earn
money, but not about how to rebuild your house. One woman told she does not know about any
NGO working specifically on protection from natural hazards. In (Uttar) Toikorerpara this is slightly
different. Here more of the women are involved in a food security project, and they mention more
often that NGOs come to visit them and give advice about what to do during the rainy season when
there are floods. The women say they get advice about boiling water, cooking food, and sometimes
they even get food support. One of the women also told the Food Security for Ultra Poor (FSUP)
project she is in, gives attention to the flood and problems arising from it. Moreover, another woman
said she does go to NGOs for food. The NGOs do not come to her, and sometimes they do not have
any food to give. Then they tell her to come back another time.
59
Peari Begum (40 yrs), living with husband (retired) and 2 children in Toikorerpara. 60
Mst. Minuri (35 yrs), living with husband (retired) and 3 children in Kochukata.
49
9.3. Loans and private borrowings.
The women’s stories on life after a hazard, and on the impacts of the hazards as told in the previous
chapters, show life after a storm can become very expensive. Not only because of the damage and
reparation costs, but also because of damaged crops and land, and raised food prices that make it
difficult to arrange enough food to feed the whole family. Particularly women from Kochukata,
Parakut and Khutiamara take private loans or borrow from neighbours or other people. Private
borrowings are often used as a way to provide for their family, to be able to buy food when there is
no other income. Some however borrow to repair the house, or improve it, just as Shimoti Shova
Rani from Parakut: “Because my house broke and income stopped, I borrow from others and it is high
interested. For 1000 they take 150 taka”61.
Many women admit borrowings are expensive and high interested, but nevertheless choose for it.
One of the reasons is because it is hard for the poor to get a loan at a bank or NGO, without being
able to proof they can repay it. About half of the women in Kochukata, Parakut and Khutiamara have
nevertheless been able to get a loan. Some have taken it as an investment for a cow, a van or a small
shop or business, just what the loans or micro-credits are for. Others use it to buy medicines and
food and have lied to get the loan62. Some take loans specifically to pay for the damage done to their
house, but often the loans have multiple reasons, of which overcoming damage is very common. Lisu
explains about the loans she and her husband take: “after the storm the loss will be a couple of
thousand taka. We don’t have any savings. If we can get a loan from a NGO, then it is okay, but if we
cannot get a loan, we go to people who have money. But it is high interested. If we take a loan from a
NGO, we will repay it in one year and generally they take in weekly. […] Generally after a flood we go
to other people to take some money. With the previous loan, there is still 1000 or 2000 left”63.
Many women admit they have debts due to loans and borrowings. They have to repay weekly and
pay from the scarce amount of money they earn. Some are not able to pay every week, and pay half
of the instalment for a couple of weeks or borrow the money from neighbours. Many take loans
yearly, but if they are not able to pay back they cannot get a new loan. One woman however
managed to do so, although it has not made her life easier. She said: “I borrowed money from 3
NGOs: UST, GOP, and ServeAid. I am not able to pay back the money. I have a debt and get yelled at
every time people come to collect the money”64.
Several women admitted they have loans at NGOs and private borrowings, but cannot repay it and
are scolded weekly by those coming to collect the instalments. Others admit the loans solve
problems on the short term, but make life difficult as the instalments need to be paid. Many however
are confident they can repay their loans and are happy with them.
61
Shimoti Shova Rani (55 yrs), widow, living with her daughter, son-in-law (works in transportation) and grandson in Parakut. 62
An informal group interview with people from a village just outside of Khutiamara taught me people tell they will invest the money, buy a cow or start a business to get a loan. They think about new reasons all the time, because buying food or repairing your house aren’t activities that pay themselves back and assure repayment of the loan. 63
Lisu (35 yrs), living with husband (river fisher) and 3 children in Parakut. 64
Nasima Atar (46 yrs), living with husband (day laborer) in Khutiamara.
50
9.4. Women’s identified needs and expressed wants.
Summarizing women’s answers to the question what would help them in dealing with the natural
hazards they face, is the answer of Asatum stating ‘for poor people money is the main concern’65. In
many ways the needs women mention do not differ from their needs in normal - non-hazardous -
times. They express the need for money, as well as for work and development so they are able to
arrange money for food, improved housing, reparation after hazards, and to pay dowry. Most
women believe that if they have a job, a steady income or money everything will be fine because
then they can take care of themselves and their families. This relates closely to the support they want
and the desire to be able to take care of their family and themselves and live a good life, also during
the rainy season and storms.
The women argue they are poor and any help will be better than nothing, also in times of floods or
after storms. They find it difficult to specify what they would want then, although some express they
want help with food, clothes, money or building materials from the government or NGOs. They say
that if they have food or money to buy food they can overcome the floods and storms and everything
will be good. Work will be equally good, because then easily they can earn money and support their
family. In general livestock, especially cows and goats are much wanted, just as related trainings.
Livestock will help support the family and generate an income as it provides milk and offspring.
Furthermore animals are assets that can be sold in times of trouble or when dowry has to be paid. If
there are any other trainings that will help them support their family they want it, even more so
because some women think that with a training they will also get money and food. Also trainings on
how to protect the family or improve the house in times of hazards are welcome, although some still
prefer money.
If they could choose any help before the rainy season, women say that if they can get money they
can improve their house. They would build a concrete house, or strengthen the current house with
tin, concrete pillars and bricks, and heighten the floor. Being able to strengthen the house before the
rainy season, or before a storm, is preferred, but help to get building materials when houses have
been damaged is also welcome. Women would like to have a stronger house not only to prevent
damage, but also to ensure the safety of family members. Shimoti Shova Rani explains: “if I could get
anything to strengthen my house, that would be good for me. If I get tin, I can easily make it strong.
Then if I fix my house, I can work anywhere and easily earn 3 days in a week, […] because the mental
pressure is not there because my house is strong. I can earn more and I can eat more, In a day I can
eat 3 times then”66.
The needs women identify and their want for development and income overlap with the opinions of
project managers in the research areas. In general they believe the main problem of the people is
that they are not educated and cannot earn enough. If they would be educated they could earn more
and have less problems. People are poor and do not have the assets to work on their own protection.
It was argued by some that natural hazards do not pose big problems at the research location, and
one manager suggested women exaggerate about the costs and damage they suffer because they
65
Asatum (22 yrs), living with husband (van puller) 2 children in Parakut. 66
Shimoti Shova Rani (55 yrs), widow, living with her daughter, son-in-law (works in transportation) and grandson in Parakut.
51
expect money. In general managers admit it is not always easy for the poor to recover, and
strengthening local response to natural hazards would help them, and they cannot take care of
everything. Only one manager thought that if NGOs would work together more and set focus more
set-up projects on dealing with natural hazards, it would help the people a lot. Besides micro-credits
they could provide materials because it might cost people around 10 000 taka to buy sufficient
materials. 67
9.5. Reflection on the support women get, need and want.
The support women get from the GoB or (i)NGOs to deal with the impact of floods and storms is,
according to their stories, minimal. The government sometimes provides rice, and NGOs provide
advice or also some rice. Taking into account the former chapters, there do not seem to be any
protection measures or mechanisms present to decrease people’s susceptibility to harm in case of
natural hazards. The only support available seem to be food security programs, micro-credits and
informal loan providers. The FSUP project gives some attention to the floods, but NGOs do not
include hazard impacts or discuss the issue as they provide people a micro-credit. In providing people
access to money they do meet one of the major needs women identify for dealing with hazards or
problems in everyday life. It gives people access to a resource they need, and with that increases
people’s capacity to act at the moment the money is available. It however also creates an obligation,
which is often hard for the poor to meet, and which reduces their capacity as instalments have to be
paid from their hard earned money throughout the rest of the year.
The women spoken to really want to be able to take care of their family and give them a good life,
also during the rainy season and storms. They see money, income and development as the ways to
do it. The assistance available to them does not seem to help as it has no lasting outcomes that: 1)
strengthen their nutrition, health, morale and other aspects of their well-being; 2) reinforce their
livelihood and its resilience to hazard impacts; 3) increase their capacity of self-protection, or; 4)
arrange access to social protection measures (Cannon et al, 2003). The perspective of women on the
outside support they get and need does show how a good government structure addressing root
causes of vulnerability does not automatically meet experienced needs, change local conditions and
contributes to safety. Neither does the attempt of NGOs to change the unsafe condition of poverty
by providing micro-credit. To release the pressure or reduce the vulnerability described in the PAR
model, there needs to be a better connection to and alignment with the livelihoods of people and
the aspects of it threatened by natural hazards. To release pressure there is a need for more than a
single institutional focus of managing disaster or the pragmatic combination of ‘development’ and
‘disaster preparedness’ preferred by NGOs.
67
Information from personal communication with managers and employees working at different projects from NGOs around Tangomari and Kachukata Hat, and Toikorerpara.
52
10. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The information gathered for this thesis is ordered and written down in the former chapters. The
chapters tell about the lives of women from poor landless households in normal times, during the
rainy season and storms, and after these natural events, and what role outside assistance plays. In
order to gain insight in the local perspective on natural hazards and the way people cope with its
threats and impacts, they provide the information gathered to answer the question: How do women
from poor landless households in Nilphamari and Gaibandha district, Bangladesh, perceive and
respond to recurring natural hazards affecting their lives, and the outside assistance they receive?
The findings from the previous chapters are put together here, and reflected upon in light of the
discussed theory on hazards, disaster, vulnerability and capacity to act. Thereafter the findings are
placed in the greater context coping and outside assistance in Bangladesh, and compared to other
recent findings and trends in academic research on coping and disaster response. The chapter will
end with a conclusion on local coping strategies from the perspective of poor women in Northern
Bangladesh.
10.1. Women’s response to floods and storms .
As explained in the theory, natural hazards are understood as natural events that are potentially
harmful and can lead to situations of severe damage. The eventual damage or impact however is not
the result of the natural event alone, but socially constructed, resulting from a situation in which a
hazard meets vulnerable people, susceptible to harm and lacking the capacity to prevent or deal with
negative impacts. Large-scale and long-term processes in society as well as people’s livelihood
characteristics lead to unsafe conditions and susceptibility to harm on the one hand, and social
protection and access to resources on the other hand. People’s livelihood choices and options,
specifically their social and economic relations and access to resources, and their personal
characteristics, their engagement in a situation as well as their experience, knowledge, life
expectations and beliefs, play important roles in their response to potentially damaging natural
hazards. As hazards tend to have unfolding impacts and situations change through time, response
has to be understood as a dynamic and context dependent process of decision making and acting.
People’s livelihoods play a central role in what is at risk and what can be done about it. This research
shows the response of women from poor landless households in Northern Bangladesh. Their
livelihoods are based on insecure and minimal incomes and they live a hand-to-mouth existence.
They eat what they earn and often face problems with food and other basic needs. Recurring rain,
floods and storms pose an additional threat to their already uncertain livelihood, as it impairs their
mobility and they cannot work, cannot earn and thus cannot buy food. Food shortage is a major
problem but cannot be anticipated as most women lack the resources and income to store food in
non-hazardous times. Since there are no social protection measures they can rely on, they depend
heavily on others for money and food.
Although actions focus on the well-being of the family, on arranging food and safety, and little to no
precautionary measures have been taken, people have developed strategies to keep their belongings
53
and animals protected during floods and storms. With the help of others, women and their families
manage to get through the hazards. Often however the impacts continue afterwards, as arranging
income and food remains problematic and additional challenges occur from damaged houses, fields
and vegetable gardens, as well as illness, injuries and sick animals. The strategy to overcome these
with working hard and more often is only partly successful as jobs are hard to find. The lack of
income is therefore compensated by eating less, borrowing money or selling household assets. This
helps for a moment, but eventually contributes to the existing problems with food and income and
keep people also in between hazards susceptible for hunger, debts and shortages of all kind.
At the research location, GOs and (i)NGOs do not give attention to the impact of floods and storms
on the daily life of people. Only occasionally food is made available, and often it is not enough or it is
poorly distributed among all people in need. There are some food security programs from NGOs, but
according to the participants no specific attention is given to the impact of floods and storms, or to
effective response. To secure their needs throughout the year many women choose to take a loan
from a bank or NGO. They are pushed either by the effects of hazards, or by the recurring problems
with meeting the needs of their family. The availability of money seems to meet the by many
identified need for money. The women see money, income and development as the solution for their
problems and the best way to meet their wish to be able to take care of their family. But loans come
with an obligation and many families have difficulties with paying the instalments.
Ideally hazard response consists of an on-going cyclical process of protective actions in which is
learned and adaptation measures are taken to improve the situation during coming hazards, but
instead the research findings show a cyclical process that seems to be a vicious circle of shortages. It
describes livelihoods that are not stable, durable, resilient and robust in the face of external shocks
like natural hazards. The response of women is based on uncertain livelihoods, with limited access to
the resources they need, limited opportunities to arrange self-protection and a lack of social
protection. Their livelihoods do not contribute to their capacity to deal with hazards, but rather
reinforces unsafe conditions as hazards and impact unfold and people have to take refuge to
measures that undermine the livelihood that supports them. Nevertheless people do not change
their strategies, seek for ways to deal with the hazards better next time, or initiate actions for
adaptation. Hazards, but even more so people’s response, put additional pressure on already
uncertain incomes and problems with money and daily needs. Loans give relief for a moment, but
eventually contribute to the pressure on income as instalments have to be paid. This influences their
capacity to adapt, prepare and respond, and their vulnerability during the next hazard, illustrating
part of the processes and dynamics of the social construction of hazard impacts.
10.2. Some notes on local coping in Bangladesh.
Underlying the choice to look at people’s response to natural hazards from the perspective of
women, is the assumption their perspective can lead to new insights as they are underrepresented in
research on coping in Bangladesh (14,6%; 10% in resp. Brouwer et al., 2007; Paul & Routray, 2011),
while some findings suggest they do most of the work to protect their family and assets in case of
disaster (Lein, 2009). The findings of this research however do not differ much from the findings of
the research described in the context chapter of this thesis. In general it confirms the importance of
54
social ties, bonding, and relations in the community as safety nets and sources for informal
borrowing of money and other resources. Furthermore it confirms skipping meals, eating less, selling
household assets and seasonal migration for work and income as common response strategies. As
found in other research, this research found most response strategies are adopted post-hazard, but
from before the onset of the hazard a sequence of strategies can be distinguished. There are
however also some nuances to these findings.
Indigenous knowledge and coping strategies.
Despite the importance of indigenous knowledge in many local response strategies in Bangladesh,
the findings of this research indicate women no longer depend on indigenous knowledge and long
used strategies. They have little to no knowledge on indications of upcoming extreme and
threatening weather and they do not recall any coping strategies learned from their parents or other
older community members. The use of ‘buras’, the roofspace called ‘kif’, and the struts called ‘doka’
or ‘teckna’ do have a long history and are community knowledge. Coping strategies based on
informal risk sharing and community cooperation, however are no (longer) common practice, as
women believe they lack the necessary resources and knowledge. Although relations are important
and many women seek advice from others, they do not expect financial support or believe they have
something to offer to others. The informal support people rely on is thus is not as strong as may be
assumed by the aid industry.
The findings also suggest extreme weather has increased in occurrence and impacts, and is now less
predictable. Therefore coping strategies used from old may be no longer sufficient. Poverty and
change in the nature of hazards may force people to search for and adopt new response strategies.
The change in the occurrence of extreme weather events, insufficient (indigenous) coping strategies
and resources link the findings of this research to the many studies done on climate change and its
impact on people’s overall well-being and coping capacity. From a livelihood perspective, not only
coping strategies may be eliminated, also certain livelihood options my become insufficient to
provide for a family’s daily needs. Adaptation is not yet part of women’s response to natural hazards,
but they and their families may not survive, and a sustainable livelihood may not be achieved, unless
they respond to this possible long-run change by adaptation to it through a change in livelihood
configuration (Scoones, 2009). Although this research did not take climate change into account, it
might be interesting to look at variations in weather events and effects on people in areas regarded
of moderate risk for disaster.
The perspective of women.
The findings of Lein (2009) made clear women play a special and important role in coping of
households from riverine communities in Bangladesh. Although the situation of the women in this
research is very different, their role in coping with hazards is no less important. Women and men
work equally hard and cooperate to overcome the impact of storms and floods. Women take special
care of the children, animals and household belongings, while men often work to earn the money
needed and assist in mornings and evenings to repair damage. A closer look at the role of women
shows they play a crucial role just before, during and after a hazard. Just before and during a hazard
they often ensure everyone and everything is safe, and if possible or necessary that food is available.
55
After the hazard their actions are crucial to make sure there is income, food and damage is repaired.
They either work to support the family’s needs, or stay home and make sure damage is repaired and
their husbands can work. Their role however in everyday life, in building and sustaining a livelihood,
may be most important. They support the family income through growing vegetables or crops, or by
taking care for animals. All this cannot be underestimated, given the fact that response is rooted in
people’s livelihoods and both household vulnerability and capacity are subject to relations and access
to resources, including women’s.
Not only does this research show the importance of women’s contributions to household livelihoods
and hazard response, although less explicitly it also shows the unequal treatment of women
compared to men. This is visible on the streets during the day and becomes clear in the stories from
women. Women often earn less than man or get paid in food instead of money. They spend much
more time at home and are expected not to visit public places like the market and tea hostels on
their own. Conditions that indicate limited access to resource like money, and limited opportunities
to establish useful relations outside of the family and neighborhood. Positive change in these
conditions may result in increased access to money/income and a broader network of relations to
rely on in times of need. This in turn can reduce the vulnerability and increase the capacity to act of
women, but also households.
Increased access to money/income and a broader network to rely may even more affect the women
that are the head of their household, as well as those taking care of the family including their elderly
husbands. They bear sole responsibility to get and keep their family and animals safe and fed during
and after floods and storms, and to make sure damage is repaired and money earned. They miss the
income and network of relations from a husband to rely on and are in general lacking access to
resources unless they are involved in food security projects aimed specifically at ultra-poor women.
Although informal support may be assumed by the aid industry, these women express feelings of
helplessness and absence of social support. A finding confirmed in a recent study of McIntyre and
Munro on the help received by ultra-poor women heads of households. They found these women are
socially regarded beyond reach, and their attempts of coping in normal life are shaped by this idea of
being beyond reach and by shame and feelings of estrangement. This group of women are likely to
have more difficulties in getting support from neighbors and family members (McIntyre & Munro,
2013). Research targeting this group would give more insight on coping strategies of this specific
group.
Outside assistance.
This thesis started with the assumption that insight in people’s response is needed for efficient
alignment and mutual reinforcement of people’s coping strategies and outside assistance. The
literature discussed in the context chapter shows many NGOs in Bangladesh focus on savings and
micro-credit and include hazard and disaster response in a pragmatic way into development
practices. Specific focus and inclusion of disaster risk reduction and management is lacking and
Jenkins (2003) specifically poses the question whether micro-credit and saving programs will help the
poor to deal with hazard impacts. The findings of this research confirm the described practices of
NGOs, as micro-credit is the only support available for many poor, and those participating in food
security programs indicate hazards and coping are not included. Furthermore the findings show
56
these forms of support do not offer structural solutions to the problems people face with hazards,
nor contribute to their coping capacity in the long term. Even when people decide to use micro-credit
for other purposes than disaster response, it may negatively affect their response capacity, as
instalments are hard to pay and force people to take refuge (especially during and after hazards) to
coping strategies that undermine their already insecure livelihood.
10.3. Conclusion.
The response of women from poor landless households in northern Bangladesh is shaped by their
insecure livelihoods and the general poverty around them. They lack resources to take structural
measures to adapt to hazardous situations, and response is aimed at maintaining life as known as
good as possible. Normal life is characterised by the principle of hand-to-mouth living, and during
hazards this is an even greater truth. Response to threats in these times focusses on the well-being of
the family, on arranging safety and food and making sure the family makes it through the hazard.
There are only limited opportunities to arrange self-protection or take refuge to social protection
measures. Yet people do make it through. Their response capacities and strategies, the limited but
available support, the food security projects, and loans, do however not structurally help and
sometimes even undermine them to deal with hazards. None of it has lasting outcomes that 1)
strengthen people’s nutrition, health, morale and other aspects of their well-being; 2) reinforce their
livelihood and its resilience to hazard impacts; 3) increase their capacity of self-protection, or; 4)
arrange access to social protection measures (Cannon et al, 2003).
By starting this research the aim was set to gain insight in local experience of hazard impact,
response and outside assistance. This aim was based on the belief that hazard response needs
efficient alignment and mutual reinforcement of local knowledge and coping strategies and outside
assistance. The theory discussed confirms this, and shows outside assistance can reduce people’s
vulnerability, increase their capacity, but can also lead to opposite results. The findings of this
research give insight in local perspectives and coping, and furthermore shows the lack of this link.
The well-developed government structure, does address root causes and includes local institutions,
but in reality does not realise its core principle of benefitting vulnerable communities, among which
women and the poor. The needs women identify are not addressed by the support provided, if any
support is provided. Moreover the programs of NGOs do not link to the particularities and reality of
the livelihoods of the poor. Its micro-credit programs seem to be a ready to use product rather than
a project designed to help people with the problems they face. The need to link identified in the
theory and also from the Bengal context are thus confirmed and the negative effects proven, also
and maybe particularly for vulnerability of the poor for hazard impacts.
The theoretical framework on which this research is based has been helpful to gain insight in
women’s perspective of and response to the impact of hazards and outside assistance. The idea of
hazard impact being a social construction finding its causes in processes in society and the
characteristics of people, their lives and livelihoods have been a good starting point. The findings
confirm people’s vulnerability and capacity are indeed based on the conditions they live in,
particularly the way they have made a living and the access to resources they have. The findings
however also show signs of psychological aspects like expectations of the future and thoughts about
57
own abilities influencing response. Although mentioned, this is not included in the theory on
livelihood discussed, but might very well deserve a place, especially as a factor influencing the
sustainability. What people believe about the future, influences how they act today and thus how
they prepare. Moreover, and maybe even more important, expectations about hazard impacts may
influence the commitment in building a livelihood.
Without sufficient strategies to cope or adaptation, hazards will remain big challenges for the poor in
northern Bangladesh, putting their livelihoods under constant pressure. It is not surprising that
thoughts of fatalism can be heard through in the women’s stories, as they ask ‘what can we do?’ and
say their future ‘depends on the Almighty’. Neither is it surprising they ask me, a researcher, for help.
They want every help they can get, and believe development is at the key of it. I however wonder
what can be done for these women and their families, as disaster proof development proves difficult.
The link between development and disaster impact however is clearly shown in this research and
Cannon and his colleagues (2003) set out four clear indications of what can help people cope.
Considering this, I do believe a change can be achieved when people’s livelihoods and its risks are
taken into account. Despite a chance of failure, it is worth a try as there is much more to gain here
than to lose.
59
REFERENCES
Adger, W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268-281.
Ahamad, M.G., Khondker, R.K., Ahmed, Z.U. & Tanin, F. (2013). Seasonal food insecurity in
Bangladesh: evidences from northern areas. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global
Change, 18, 1077-1088
Ahmed, A.U., Quisumbing, A.R., Nasreen, M., Hoddinott, J.F. & Bryan, E. (2009). Comparing Food and
Cash Transfers to the Ultra Poor in Bangladesh. Washington, DC.: International Food Policy
Research Institute (IFPRI). Retrieved on September 18, 2013, from:
http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/rr163.pdf
Akter, S. (2012). The role of microinsurance as safety net against environmental risks in Bangladesh.
The Journal of Environmental Development, 21(2), 263-280
Alam, D. & Collins, A.E. (2010). Cyclone disaster vulnerability and response experiences in coastal
Bangladesh. Disasters, 34(4), 931-954
Alexander, D. (1997). The study of natural disasters, 1977-1997: some reflections on a changing field
of knowledge. Disasters, 21(4), 284-304
Bannerman, M., Rashid, Md.H.O. & Revje, K. (2011). NGO-government partnerships for disaster
preparedness in Bangladesh. Humanitarian Exchange Magazine, 50. Retrieved March 12, 2013,
from: http://www.odihpn.org/humanitarian-exchange-magazine/issue-
50/ngo%E2%80%93government-partnerships-for-disaster-preparedness-in-bangladesh
BBS (2007a). Zila Profile. Zila: Nilphamari. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved October 15,
2013, from: http://www.bbs.gov.bd/RptZillaProfile.aspx
BBS (2007b). Zila Profile. Zila: Gaibandha; Upazila/Thana: Saghatta. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
Retrieved October 15, 2013, from: http://www.bbs.gov.bd/RptZillaProfile.aspx
BBS & SID (2011). Population and housing census 2011. Socio-economic and Demographic Report.
National Series, volume 4. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and Statistics and Informatics
Division, Ministry of Planning.
BBS & SID (2012a). Community Report Nilphamari Zila, June 2012. Population and housing census
2011. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of
Planning. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from:
http://www.bbs.gov.bd/PageWebMenuContent.aspx?MenuKey=478
BBS & SID (2012b). Community Report Gaibandha Zila, June 2012.Population and housing census
2011. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of
Planning. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from:
http://www.bbs.gov.bd/PageWebMenuContent.aspx?MenuKey=475
60
Benson, C. & Twigg, J. (2007). Tools for mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction. Guidance notes for
development organisations. Geneva: ProVention Consortium. Retrieved December 18, 2012,
from: http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=1066
Biesta, G. & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of
agency-as-achievement. Working Paper TLRP
Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual
frameworks and definitions. In: J. Birkmann (Ed.), Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards:
towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press
Birkmann, J. (2011). First- and second-order adaptation to natural hazards and extreme events in the
context of climate change. Natural Hazards, 58, 811-840.
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O.D., Carrreño, M.L., Barbat, A.H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger,
S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P. & Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal
responses: the MOVE framework. Natural Hazards, 67, 193-211.
Birkmann, J. & Teichman, K. von (2010). Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change
adaptation: key challenges – scales, knowledge and norms. Sustainability Science, 5, 171-184
Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L. & Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to
environmental risk: A case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis,
27(2), 313-326.
Campbell, C. (2009). Distinguishing the power of agency from agentic power: a note on Weber and
the “Black Box” of personal agency. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 407-418.
Cannon, T. (2008). Vulnerability, “innocent” disasters and the imperative of cultural understanding.
Disaster Prevention and Management, 17(3), 350-357
Cannon, T., Twigg, J. & Rowell, J. (2003). Social Vulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and disasters.
Report to DFID Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance Department (CHAD) and Sustainable
Livelihoods Support Office. Retrieved July 22, 2013 from:
http://www.eldis.org/go/topics&id=21628&type=Document
Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial introduction: vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin, 20(2), 1-7.
Connor, S. (2011). Structure and agency: a debate for community development? Community
Development Journal, 46(S2), ii97-ii110.
DDM (n.d.). As per standing orders. Union Disaster Management Committee (UDMC). Department of
Disaster Management. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from:
http://www.ddm.gov.bd/committe/udmc.pdf
Del Nino, C., Dorosh, P.A., Smith, L.C. & Roy, D.K. (2001) The 1998 Floods in Bangladesh. Disaster
impacts, household coping strategies, and response. (Research Report 122). Washington D.C.:
International Food Policy Research Institute.
61
Department of Disaster Management (2012). Outline of most severe disaster. Ministry of Disaster
Management and Relief: Department of Disaster Management. Retrieved December 4, 2012,
from: http://www.dmb.gov.bd/s-disaster
DFID (2005). Disaster Risk Reduction: a development concern. Policy briefing. UK Department for
International Development.
Disaster Management Vision (n.d.). Retrieved October 3, 2013, from:
http://www.ddm.gov.bd/govvision.php
DMB (2012). Creation of DMB. Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief: Department of Disaster
Management. Retrieved December 19, 2012, from: http://www.dmb.gov.bd/creation.
DMB & DMRD (2010). National Plan for Disaster Management 2010-2015. Government of the
People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
EM-DAT (2012a). The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database. Brussels: Université Catholique de
Louvain. Retrieved January 4, 2013, from: http://www.emdat.be/natural-disasters-trends.
EM-DAT (2012b). The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database. Brussels: Université Catholique
de Louvain. Retrieved January 5, 2013, from: http://www.emdat.be/result-country-profile
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
Flood [topographic map] (2000). Retrieved October 15, 2013, from:
http://www.apipnm.org/swlwpnr/reports/y_sa/z_bd/bdmp261.htm
Flood [topographic map] (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2013 from:
http://lib.pmo.gov.bd/maps/images/bangladesh/Flood.gif
Frerks, G. E., Hilhorst, D., & Moreyra, A. (1999). Natural Disasters. A Framework for analysis and
action. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
Gaillard, J.C. (2010). Vulnerability, capacity and resilience: perspectives for climate and development
policy. Journal of International Development, 22, 218-232.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory action, structure, and contradiction in social
analysis. Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Hutton, D & Haque, C.E. (2004). Human vulnerability, dislocation and resettlement : adaptation
processes of river-bank erosion-induced displacees in Bangladesh. Disasters, 28(1), 41-62.
Jenkins, B. (2003). NGOS in Bangladesh: are they in a strong position to assist vulnerable people in
living on low-lying lands to cope with floods? Journal of South Asian Studies, 26(3), 455-466.
Juneja, S. (2008). Disasters and poverty: the risk nexus. A review of literature. Background paper for
the 2009 ISDR global assessment report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: United Nations
International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction Secretariat.
Khan, M.R. & Rahman, M.A. (2007). Partnership approach to disaster management in Bangladesh: a
critical policy assessment. Natural Hazards, 41, 359-378.
62
Khandker, S.R. (2007) Coping with Flood: role of institutions in Bangladesh. Agricultural Economics,
36, 169-180.
Lein, H. (2009). The poorest and most vulnerable? On hazards, livelihoods and labelling of riverine
communities in Bangladesh. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30, 98-113.
Long, N. (1992). From paradigm lost to paradigm regained? In: N. Long & A. Long (Eds.), Battlefields
of knowledge. The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development.
London and New York: Routledge.
Mallick, D.L., Rahman, A., Alam, M., Juel, A.S.Md., Ahmad, A.N. & Alam, S.S. (2005). Case Study 3:
Bangladesh. Floods in Bangladesh: A shift from disaster management towards disaster
preparedness. IDS Bulletin, 36(4), 53-70.
Masud-All-Kamal, Md. (2013). Livelihood coping and recovery from disaster: The case of coastal
Bangladesh. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 35-44.
Matin, N. & Taher, Md. (2001). The changing emphasis of disasters in Bangladesh NGOs. Disasters,
25(3), 227-239.
McIntyre, L. & Munro, J. (2013). “Nobody helps us”: insights from ultra-poor Bangladeshi women on
being beyond reach. Development in Practice, 23(2), 157-168.
Ministries and Divisions (n.d.). Retrieved October 3, 2013, from:
http://www.bangladesh.gov.bd/index.php?option=com_weblinks&task=ministry&Itemid=152
Neumayer, E. & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of
catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981-2002. Annals of the Association
of American Geographers, 97(3), 551-566.
Oliver-Smith, A. & Hoffman, S.M. (2002). Introduction: why anthropologist should study disasters. In:
S.M. Hoffman and A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe and culture. The anthropology of disaster.
Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Paul, B.K. (2006). Disaster relief efforts: an update. Progress in Development Studies, 6(3), 211-223.
Paul, S.K. & Routray, J.K. (2010). Flood proneness and coping strategies: the experiences of two
villages in Bangladesh. Disasters, 34(2), 489-508.
Paul, S.K. & Routray, J.K. (2011). Household response to cyclone and induced surge in coastal
Bangladesh: coping strategies and explanatory variables. Natural Hazards, 57, 477-499.
PreventionWeb (2012). Bangladesh - Disaster Statistics. Retrieved December 4, 2012, from:
http://www.preventionweb.net/english/countries/statistics/index.php?cid=14.
Schmidt, A. & Bloemertz, L. (2006). Vulnerability and poverty – a co-dependent pair. In: A. Schmidt, L.
Bloemertz and E. Macamo (Eds.), Linking Poverty Reduction and Disaster Risk Management.
Eschborn: GTZ
63
Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihood perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies,
36(1), 171-196
Scott, J. & Marshall, G. (2009). Agency. In: A dictionary of sociology (3rd ed). Oxford: Oxford University
Press. Retrieved December 30, 2012, from: http://
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199533008.001.0001/acref-
9780199533008-e-41?rskey=Oo1II6&result=1
Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Jaquet, S., Derron, M-H., Jaboyedoff & Devkota, S. (2012). A case study of coping
strategies and landslides in two villages of Central-Eastern Nepal. Applied Geography, 32,680-
690
Sultana, N. & Rayhan, Md.I. (2012). Coping strategies with floods in Bangladesh: an empirical study.
Natural Hazards, 64, 1209-1218.
UNDP (2013). Explanatory note on 2013 HDR composite indices. Bangladesh. Retrieved October 1,
2013, from: http://hdrstats.undp.org/images/explanations/BGD.pdf
WFP (2005). Extreme Poverty Map 2005. World Food Programme. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from:
http://www.foodsecurityatlas.org/bgd/country/access/poverty
Wisner B. & Adams, J. (2002). Environmental health in emergencies and disasters. A practical guide.
Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO). Retrieved on December 28, 2012, from:
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/hygiene/emergencies/emergencies2002/en/
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability
and disasters (2nd edition). London: Routledge
Wisner, B., Gaillard, J.C. & Kelman, I. (2012). Framing disaster. Theories and stories seeking to
understand hazards, vulnerability and risk. In: B.Wisner, J.C. Gaillard & I. Kelman (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. Oxon and New York: Routledge
World Bank (2006). Hazards of Nature, Risk to Development. An IEG evaluation of World Bank
assistance for natural disasters. Washington D.C: The World Bank
WorldBank, BBS & WFP (n.d). Updating Poverty Maps of Bangladesh. Key Findings. World Bank,
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics & the United Nations World Food Programme. Retrieved
October 15, 2013 from:
http://www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/UpdatingPovertyMapsofBanglade
sh.pdf
65
APPENDIX
Relevant topics to discuss in the interviews were selected from the theory:
a) hazards and disasters,
b) vulnerability and capacity, with at the center people’s livelihoods and relations, as well as
their past experiences, life expectations and beliefs, and
c) outside assistance or social protection being it activities from government bodies and NGOs,
or community collective action.
and guided by 5 (overlapping) themes identified in the main question of this research:
1) occurring natural hazards and disasters,
2) women’s perception of these and
3) their response,
4) outside assistance of government and NGOs and
5) women’s perception of this outside assistance.
Based on these topics and themes the interviews were guided by the following interview set-up:
Interview set-up Possible topics to discuss
General information - Name / age / living location / years living at current location / household composition / literacy & education
- occupation household members / other income generating activities / income per day / homestead garden / animals
- main problems / social support for and from others - involvement in NGO and GO projects
Natural hazards - Problematic weather or natural hazards - description (what is it, when does it occur, how long etc and what
happens, life during its occurrence) - has it changed compared to 5 or 10 years ago - expectations for the future
Damage / impact - Human lives - houses and shelter - household items - crops and garden - animals - food and food security - work and income - drinking water and sanitation - possible other effects - local economy for each of these: - what is done to protect it - what are the effects on it - how overcome the impacts
Outside assistance - Help from NGO or GO (what, who, when and why) - expectations and opinion - needs and wants