he statistics from sfc john duffy. he stats sfc collections early stats (aggregate) final figures...
TRANSCRIPT
HE Statistics from SFC
John Duffy
HE stats
SFC collections Early Stats (aggregate) Final figures (aggregate) Other activity (previously called Minor
Volume Indicators – data for research funding formulae)
Knowledge transfer metrics (unlikely to continue – data for KT funding formula)
HESA collections
Student record Staff record Finance record DLHE surveys
Student record
Participation report Retention report PIs
Participation report
Post-compulsory school age participation FES HESA Some school data from pupil census
Detailed geographical breakdown Intermediate zones (rates are smoothed)
Retention report
Logistic regression analysis producing ‘expected values’ by subject and institution Adjusted for qualifications,
demographics etc Cross-validation (excludes the institution
and subject category data) Compare with actual outcomes
PIs
Produced by HESA – ‘owned’ by HEFCE
Problems Access PI - low participation based on
UK levels and all entrants NS-SEC PI – again based on all entrants Scotland has few low-participation areas
on a UK basis 11% of all UK entrants in 2008-09 were
from outside Scotland
Scottish domiciled students
Access PI based on SIMD and datazones Most deprived 40% Most deprived 20%
SEC PI Entrants from elsewhere in the UK tend
to be of higher social class than entrants from Scotland
PI for all young u/g entrants from SC 4 5 6 7 UK 30.1 Sc26.6 Sc Sc dom 29.0
Lighter touch?
Not so far One-off WARP collection
Entrants in 2008-09 Did they come back in 2009-10?
Single collection Replace Early Stats, HESA SR, Final
figures One retimed collection
Problem of divergence from UK system
Participation Report
Zeg AshrafSFC Statistics26 March 2010
Aims
To summarise participation in FE and HE amongst Scottish domiciled 16+ year olds
Examine variation in participation by geography time student subgroups population subgroups
Data
FESHeadcount derived by matching
enrolments
HESA student recordsStudents at UK HEIs
School pupil census (September)By age on 1st March State schools only
Exclusions
FE enrolments on non-funded courses Students under 16 on 28th February
But includes Postgraduate students College school link courses in FE All FE students regardless of length of
study
Calculating FTE’s
HESA with reference to a full-time, full-year
student (1)
FES For comparability:
Full-time: 1 Part-time: hours studied / expected hours
for full-time course Adjusted for non-completion
FE ParticipationHeadcount FTE
© Crown Copyright. All rights reserved.Scottish Funding Council OSKW9912 (2009).
Glasgow area
Edinburgh area
Aberdeen area
Dundee area
Forth Valley
FE SPR 2007-08
> 1.51.3 - 1.51.1 - 1.30.9 - 1.10.7 - 0.90.5 - 0.7< 0.5Local Authority © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved.
Scottish Funding Council OSKW9912 (2009).
Glasgow area
Edinburgh area
Aberdeen area
Dundee area
Forth Valley
FE SPR for FTEs2007-08
> 1.5
1.3 - 1.5
1.1 - 1.3
0.9 - 1.1
0.7 - 0.9
0.5 - 0.7
< 0.5
Local Authority
Missing postcodes
Data zones imputed for students with no valid postcode
Use matching characteristics related to home location
HESA – local authority and previous institution (1.2 %)
FES - local authority, campus, college (1.2 %)
Population estimation
Mid-year population estimates from GROS by datazone, age, gender
Students recorded at term-time address
As FES and HESA record students at home address, useful if population estimates can be ‘corrected’ to do the same.
Population estimation 2
Two census tables used to adjust estimates: CAS012 - the number of schoolchildren
and students in full-time education living away from home in term-time.
T17 - the number of full-time students and schoolchildren in an area by their accommodation type.
Measuring participation
Rates in population Student sub-groups
Age-gender standardised rates Geographical comparisons Standardised Participation Ratio (SPR):
Observed / Expected if national rates applied
National SPR=1
Key findings from current report the total number of individuals studying in college
or university education has fallen between 2003-04 and 2007-08.
there is substantial geographical variation in levels of participation. Many areas that have relatively low participation in further education have relatively high participation in higher education, and vice versa
In college further education participation in the most deprived areas is 40 per cent higher than that in the less deprived in 2007-08
In college and university higher education participation is higher for women than men in all age groups. In 2007-08, among those aged 16-20, 24 per cent of women were in higher education, compared with 19 per cent of men
Participation Report on SFC Website www.sfc.ac.uk
Reports and PublicationsNov 2008
Next report (2004-05 to 2008-09) due in May 2010
Copies of Technical Report can be provided on request