health assessment & self- care in kidney ارزیابی سلامت کلیه و خود مراقبتی...

Download Health Assessment & Self- Care in Kidney ارزیابی سلامت کلیه و خود مراقبتی دکتر سید منصور گتمیری SM Gatmiri, MD, Nephrologist, Imam Khomeini

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: franklin-houston

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Health Assessment & Self- Care in Kidney SM Gatmiri, MD, Nephrologist, Imam Khomeini Hospital, NSEP, NRC, TUMS, October 2014 In The Name of God
  • Slide 2
  • Health care includes : 1- Treatment for current illness, 2- Preventive care to lessen future health decline.
  • Slide 3
  • Issues in effective preventive care. -Which to recommend? -Which to discourage? Conditions, Tests & Interventions
  • Slide 4
  • Principles on priorities
  • Slide 5
  • Identifying those conditions that cause largest burden. A small number of modifiable factors probably underlies a large number of outcomes.
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Labeling Effect -Positive: All the screening tests were normal -Negative: Screening test is abnormal and more testing is necessary
  • Slide 10
  • False-positive tests cause worry even after NL follow- up tests. Such situations might promote a sense of vulnerability instead of health. Examples: HCVAb+, PSA &
  • Slide 11
  • HTN (Accounts for 35% of MI and strokes, 49% of episodes of heart failure, and 24% of premature deaths), DM, Smoking, Crash, Breast cancer, Lung cancers, Prostate cancer, Violence, & are issues in effective preventive care
  • Slide 12
  • Examples The optimal interval for screening for HTN is not known. The 2007 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend screening -Every 2 years for SBP
  • Stage 1: NL GFR (>90 mL/min/1.73 m2) & persistent albuminuria (1.8% of the total US adult population). Stage 2: GFR 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2 & persistent albuminuria (3.2 %). Stage 3: GFR 30 & 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 (7.7 %). Stage 4: GFR 15 & 29 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.35 %). Stage 5: GFR of
  • Slide 22
  • SCREENING FOR CKD The NKF-K/DOQI, recommend that all individuals should be assessed for developing CKD.
  • Slide 23
  • Targeting Screening for CKD DM, CVD, HTN, HLP, obesity, metabolic syndrome, smoking, HIV, HBV, HCV infection, Malignancy, Family history of CKD, Age >60 years, Treatment with potentially nephrotoxic drugs
  • Slide 24
  • Testing can be done with 1-U/A 2-First morning or a random "spot" urine for alb or protein & Cr assessment & 3-Serum Cr for GFR determination.
  • Slide 25
  • Ultrasonography in particular risk factors, such as ADPKD &
  • Slide 26
  • GFR=(Ux. V)/Px
  • Slide 27
  • Slide 28
  • MDRD These equations were validated in studies of white patients with nondiabetic CKD.
  • Slide 29
  • Equation which GFR can be calculated using Cystatin C = [100/Cystatin C (mg/L) ]-14
  • Slide 30
  • Excretion of Uremic Toxins
  • Slide 31
  • Kidney International, Vol. 63, Supplement 84 (2003), pp. S6S10
  • Slide 32
  • Excretion of Volume Overload
  • Slide 33
  • Evaluation of Overload, HTN, Pulmonary Edema, Prominent JVP, Generalized Edema
  • Slide 34
  • Balance in Acid Base system
  • Slide 35
  • Tackypnea, Kusmul Breathing, ABG, VBG, Bone Disorder, Muscles wasting,
  • Slide 36
  • Balance in Electrolytes
  • Slide 37
  • Hypo & Hypernatremia Hypo & Hyperkalemia Edema HTN Hypo & Hypercalcemia &
  • Slide 38
  • Trigger of Hematopoesis
  • Slide 39
  • Hb, Hct, Serum Iron, TIBC, Ferritin
  • Slide 40
  • Effect on Vit D & Bone Metabolism
  • Slide 41
  • Ca, P, PTH, Vit D level, (25 OH & Calcitriol), Bone Densitometry, Radiography &
  • Slide 42
  • Patient-Professional Partnership Self-care in Kidney diseases.
  • Slide 43
  • Self-efficacy training for ESRD Journal of Advanced Nursing Volume 43, Issue 4 pages 370375, August 2003
  • Slide 44
  • This RCT examine the effectiveness of self-efficacy training on fluid intake in ESRD.
  • Slide 45
  • In 62 ESRD patients -Experimental group (n = 31) received 12 sessions of structured self-efficacy training (based on Bandura's theory and included an educational component, performance mastery, experience sharing, and stress management) -Control group (n = 31) received routine care.
  • Slide 46
  • Programme focused on: CRF, HD, medications, complications, nutrition, drinking, control of thirst, stress management & participants learned to relax muscles through music, interviewes, weight gain &... & if the goals were achieved, praise and recognition rewards were given.
  • Slide 47
  • Analysis of the sample Table 1 lists the clinical and demographical characteristics of patients who completed the study (n = 62).
  • Slide 48
  • There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, education levels, current use of medication, length of dialysis, symptoms, biochemical data, Kt/V, types of dialyser used and number of chronic diseases between the groups (P > 005).
  • Slide 49
  • Body weight change was significantly different between 2 groups (t = 403, P = 001).
  • Slide 50
  • Mean weight change between groups Descriptive statistics of mean body weight gains for the experimental and control groups at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months following the self-efficacy training are presented in.
  • Slide 51
  • The impact of self- management support (SMS) on the progression of CKD A prospective randomized controlled trial Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. (2011) 26 (11): 3560-3566. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr047 First published online: March 17, 2011
  • Slide 52
  • Methods 54 CKD (Stages IIIV) patients; 27 were randomized into an SMS group and the 27 into a non-SMS group. SMS comprised -health information, -patient education, -telephone-based support and -aid of a support group.
  • Slide 53
  • The primary end points were -absolute eGFR alteration and -of hospitalization events. The secondary end points were -an eGFR decrease of up to 50%, -ESRD demanding RRT, -all cause mortality or a -composite secondary end point.
  • Slide 54
  • Results Absolute eGFR at the end of the study was significantly higher in SMS patients (29.11 20.61 versus 15.72 10.67 mL/min; P < 0.05).
  • Slide 55
  • Fewer hospitalization events for SMS patients [5 (18.50%) versus 12 (44.47%); P < 0.05]. One patient (3.7%) in the SMS group and 9 (33.3%) in the non-SMS group had an eGFR reduction of >50% (P < 0.05).
  • Slide 56
  • Survival analysis of the composite secondary end points of ESRD that required RRT and all-cause mortality revealed no differences between the two groups.
  • Slide 57
  • Prevalence and associations of limited health literacy (HL) in CKD A systematic review Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. (2013) 28 (1): 129-137. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs371 First published online: December 4, 2012
  • Slide 58
  • 7 databases were searched. 82 studies were identified & of which 6 met the inclusion criteria. The total number of people in all studies was 1405. 5 studies were in dialysis or transplant populations, and all were from the USA.
  • Slide 59
  • The review identified associations between limited HL and socio- economic factors (lower education, lower income), and certain process and outcome measures (lower likelihood of referral for transplant, higher mortality).
  • Slide 60
  • Conclusions Limited HL is common among people with CKD and independently associated with socio-economic factors and health outcomes. It may represent an important determinant of inequality in CKD.
  • Slide 61