health financing and universal health coverage - what's gender got to do with it?
TRANSCRIPT
Health financing & UHC – what’s gender got to do
with it?Sophie WitterJanuary 2016
Background: webinar panel, 1 July 2015
Introduction to health financing and UHC
Rob Yates,Chatham House, UK
Gendered questions related to health financing and gaps in health literature
Sophie Witter,Queen Margaret University, UK
Gender implications of health financing reforms
Veloshnee Govender, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Lessons on health sector reforms and gender from India, and lessons for UHC
TK Sundari Ravindran,Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, India
Commentary Sarah Ssali,Makerere University, School of Women and Gender Studies, Uganda
Q&A
Webinar process and outputs• X people participated; positive feedback – mostly
excellent ratings, some good• Video of webinar, webinar slides, storify and blog
relating to it all posted on RinGS site:http://resyst.lshtm.ac.uk/resources/gender-and-health-systems-financing
• Article in draft for special edition of Health Policy and Planning – ‘minding the gaps’
Some core insights – minding the (research) gap
• Need for more cross-cutting of silos: shocking that work on health financing and gender is so limited•Most work as been done on user fees and gender and
household impacts, plus some analysis of funding allocations to MCH/RH
• All other areas remain under-explored – especially on resource allocation, purchasing, benefits packages and governance
• Also need more investigation of gender implications of different health financing reforms and relationship between gender equity and UHC
Core insights – minding the (equity) gap• Gender-based vulnerabilities not factored into the design of health
financing schemes (e.g. high % of women in informal sector)• Education, employment & wealth do not mean that women automatically
have access to cash - critical consideration for UHC• Addressing unintended consequences, e.g. insurance packages with
limited household numbers & adverse effects• UHC requires an essential health package that goes beyond maternal
health & addresses women's needs across the life cycle (including routine SRH services)
• Abortion remains very contested service, even in countries which have comprehensive packages
• Market failures, e.g. gender-biases and profit-seeking combine to produce peculiar distortions (e.g. unnecessary hysterectomies)
• To operationalise 'progressive universalism' we must engage with the politics, as well as underlying social determinants