healthcoach4me evaluation and recommendations esther sheppard idia612
DESCRIPTION
HealthCoach4Me Evaluation and Recommendations Esther Sheppard IDIA612. Home page:“Take Charge of Your Health” Activates users to take action. Patient Activation Measure. Goal: Visual simplification;. Visual Simplification. 1. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
HealthCoach4Me
Evaluation and RecommendationsEsther Sheppard
IDIA612
Home page:“Take Charge of Your Health”
Activates users to take action
Pat
ient
Act
ivat
ion
Mea
sure
Goal: Visual simplification; V
isua
l Sim
plif
icat
ion
1. Three large boxes at bottom are more distinguishable then elements above.
11
Site has vibrant color; implies energy, success, and fun with lots of information. Users can identify with portraits. Homepage is visually too busy; hard to read/scan
Hea
lthc
oach
4Me.
com
Hom
e pa
ge
1.Too much motion2. Not enough negative (empty/quiet) space
11
11
22
By simplifying visual space user can find and read primary information easily
Vis
ual S
impl
ific
atio
n
Visual simplification
Vis
ual S
impl
ific
atio
n
22
1. Registration buttons have been consolidated to one prominent location. In interior pages it is a rectilinear button in similar location.
2. Animated squares were removed and replaced with two links to videos. “Why Register” was removed.
3. More negative space as well as appropriate space between lines of text makes reading and scanning easier to communicate important information.
33
11
Healthcoach4Me.com
• Includes audience of older adults
– Stress Management
– COPD
– Heart Disease
– Diabetes
– Medicine
Aud
ienc
e
Goal: Navigation which is usable for all targeted age groups; Use proportional size to distance of targets
Nav
igat
ion
11
1. The purple space between the main navigation and secondary navigation is too wide and isn’t utilized effectively.
2. The distance between links is too far and the targets are too small.3. Result: Older adults will have a more difficult time using the site.
Navigation is usable for all targeted age groups; Proportional size to distance of targets
Nav
igat
ion
1. Main navigation is grouped closely and larger in scale. Health Library opens to reveal Health Management and Medical Conditions categories.
2. My Coaching Plan slides down to accommodate two categories.
11
22
Goal: Enable users to skip repetitive navigation linksN
avig
atio
n
The previous animated program list opens to the same list which requires an added step to register or take a tour.
Nav
igat
ion
Process Flows: Animated Programs on left. Proposal on right.N
avig
atio
n
Home
Health Library
Health Management
Medicine
Home
View all Programs
Registration form
Dashboard
Health Library
Medicine
The previous animated program list which constitutes the Health Library, has been reorganized into two categories which open to reveal linked text.
Nav
igat
ion
1. Icons have been removed.2. Alternative, static, healthful happy person imageResult: Navigation is in one place; links go directly to content.
11
22
Goal: Error PreventionE
rror
Pre
vent
ion
1. Unnecessary space contributes to need to scroll (2).3. Text is too small and not spaced well.Result: Chunking would enable older users to register more easily
11
22
33
Provide clear feedback on actions; fix bugP
robl
em w
ith
logi
n
11
11
22
1. Email is already registered but doesn’t match records.2. Password is correct
Registration ProcessE
rror
Pre
vent
ion
11
1. Login and Register take user to one point of entry.
Login or register entry pointE
rror
Pre
vent
ion
User has single page to complete login process or initiate registration.
Text block is chunked to eliminate scrollingE
rror
Pre
vent
ion
Separation of text block from form enables quick scanning.
Goal: Consistency and AnticipationE
rror
Pre
vent
ion
22
11
1. Registration steps let user know where they are in process2. Input is in consistent location
Consistency of location of inputE
rror
Pre
vent
ion
11
1. Next Step in same location.
“Start my Coaching Plan” finalizes process with “Submit”E
rror
Pre
vent
ion
“Explore” programs are redundant with health library but don’t have a clear purpose.
Hea
lth
Too
ls
Alternative proposal on home page: “Try a Health Tool”H
ealt
h T
ools
Health Tools: Three health tools for users to sample directly.
Hea
lth
Too
ls
Process Flows: Animated Programs on left. “Try a Health Tool” on right.H
ealt
h T
ools
Home
Try a Health Tool
Relaxation Activity
Home
View all Programs
Registration form
Dashboard
Health Library
COPD
Result: •Direct Access to tool•Less Frustration•Experiential information delivered•Provides broader understanding of resources on site•Interactive
Recommendations:• Consider older users as guide for interface and interaction design
• Simplify visual space
• Simplify and reorganize navigation; utilize Fitts’ Law
• Minimize vertical scrolling
• Use familiar language
• Organize registration for one point of entry; simplified visual field, consistency and anticipation
• Reconsider goal of animated program list; use minimal selection to inform potential members of available tools with direct action and broaden their understanding of what the site offers.
Additional recommendation:
• Consider content inventory of all PDF’s and reorganize to inform categorizations and access.
References Athavale, A., V., (2010) Usability evaluation of two websites providing
information on Diabetes. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries. Vol.4 •
No.2.P46. Retrieved June 1, 2011 from http://www.jhidc.org/index.php/jhidc/article/viewFile/48/82
Chisnell,D, E., Redish, J, C., Lee, A. (2006) New heuristics for understanding older adults as web users. Retrieved May 28,2011 from www.usabilityworks.net/resources/chisnell_redish_lee_heuristics.pdf
De Jong, M., Van Der Geest, T., (2000) Characterizing web heuristics. TechnicalCommunication 47 pp 311-25. Retrieved May 28, 2011 from http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/library/jong_00_heuristics.pdf
Hibbard, J. (2007) The elusive health care consumer: What will it take to activate patients? Retrieved May 28, 2011 from http://www.academyhealth.org/Publications/BriefList.cfm?navItemNumber=534
Koivunen, M-R., McCathieNevile, C. (2009) Accesible graphics and multimedia on the web. Retreived on May 31, 2011 from http://www.w3.org/2001/05/hfweb/heuristics.htm
Nielsen, J. Ten usability heuristics. Retrieved on May 28, 2011. http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html
Heu
rist
ics
References Paddison. C., Englefield, P., (2004) Applying heuristics to accessibility inspections. Interacting
with Computers 16, pp. 507–521. Retrieved May 28,2011 from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/intcom
Randeree, E. and Rao, H.R. (2004) ‘E-health and assurance: curing hospital websites’, Int. J. Electronic Healthcare, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.33–46.
Research-based web design & usability guidelines. Retrieved June 1, 2011 from
http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/
Section 508 standards guide Retrieved May 28, 2011 fromhttp://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?fuseAction=stdsdoc#Web
Tognazzini, B. First principles of interaction design Retrieved May 29, 2011 from http://www.asktog.com/basics/firstPrinciples.html
Heu
rist
ics