hear this you elders, and give ears all you inhabitants of the land!
DESCRIPTION
Hear this you Elders, and give ears all you inhabitants of the land! Has anything like this happened in your days, or even in the days of your fathers? Tell your children about it…. What the chewing locust left the swarming locust has eaten; - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Hear this you Elders, and give ears all you inhabitants of the land!
Has anything like this happened in your days, or even in the days of your fathers?
Tell your children about it….
What the chewing locust left the swarming locust has eaten;
What the swarming locust left, the crawling locust has eaten;
And what the crawling locust left, the consuming locust has eaten
“sea level rises and agricultural changes could result in an estimated 150 million environmental refugees by 2050”
Dr. R. Pachauri – Chairman of IPCC, 2005
Samoa’s NAPA Experience
Peniamina D Leavai (Coordinator)
Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment & Meteorology
Climate changes for Samoa
Reduction overall annual rainfallFrequency of sporadic rainfall
events Increase average temperatureRising sea-levels Increase frequency and intensity of
tropical cyclone / hurricanes
Overall NAPA process & experience
NAPA process exceptional in its country-driven approach
Vision: To achieve a high level of community capacity for adaptation to adverse impacts of climate change
National Vision: For every Samoan to achieve a better quality of life (Strategy for the Development of Samoa, SDS 2005-2007)
Objectives of the NAPA
To develop and implement immediate and urgent project based activities to adapt to cc
To protect life and livelihoods of people, infrastructure and environment
To incorporate adaptation measures and goals into national and sectoral policies, and development goals; and
To increase awareness of cc impacts and adaptation activities in communities, civil society and government
Develop Project ProfilesAnd Submit NAPA
13 Pre -Synthesis Sectoral Reports
13 Pre -Synthesis Sectoral Reports
Periodic Review ofRisks and Prioritization
of Activities
Rank Projects/Activities andDemonstrate Integration intoNational Policy Frameworks
And Programmes\
Undertake CriteriaPrioritization Process(Ranking the Criteria)
Articulate Potential NAPAActivities based on Ideas
From Consultation
Conduct Public ConsultationAiming at Identifying Potential
Ideas for Activities
Existing AssessmentsAdequate for NAPA
Development
Participatory Rapid Assessment ofCurrent Vulnerability and PotentialIncrease in Climate Hazards and
Associated Risks
Synthesize Available Impact Assessments,Coping Strategies, Past Consultations,
Trends and Existing Development Frameworks
Build NAPA Team and Multidisciplinary Team
Develop Project ProfilesAnd Submit NAPA
Develop Project ProfilesAnd Submit NAPA
Periodic Review ofRisks and Prioritization
of Activities
Periodic Review ofRisks and Prioritization
of Activities
Ranking of Projects/ActivitiesAnd involve demonstrationOf integration into national
Policy frameworks in Projects
Ranking of Projects/ActivitiesAnd involve demonstrationOf integration into national
Policy frameworks in Projects
Tier-1 and Tier-2 CriteriaPrioritization and SelectionOf Key Adaptation Needs
Tier-1 and Tier-2 CriteriaPrioritization and SelectionOf Key Adaptation Needs
Articulate Potential NAPAActivities based on Ideas
From Consultation
Articulate Potential NAPAActivities based on Ideas
From Consultation
Conduct Public ConsultationAiming at Identifying Potential
Ideas for Activities
Conduct Public ConsultationAiming at Identifying Potential
Ideas for Activities
e.g. CIM Plans, NBSAPs,First Nat Com, MEAs
e.g. CIM Plans, NBSAPs,First Nat Com, MEAs
Participatory Rapid Assessment ofCurrent Vulnerability and PotentialIncrease in Climate Hazards and
Associated Risks
Participatory Rapid Assessment ofCurrent Vulnerability and PotentialIncrease in Climate Hazards and
Associated Risks
Synthesize Available Impact Assessments,Coping Strategies, Past Consultations,
Trends and Existing Development Frameworks
Synthesize Available Impact Assessments,Coping Strategies, Past Consultations,
Trends and Existing Development Frameworks
Climate Change Synthesis ReportClimate Change Synthesis Report
Public Consultation ReportPublic Consultation Report
National Climate Change Country TeamNAPA Task Team
National Climate Change Country TeamNAPA Task Team
??
IMMEDIATE & URGENT COMMUNITY NEEDS
PERCENT (%)
PRIORITY RANKING
Water Availability, Quality & Accessibility
17.6 1
Reforestation 15.2 2
Education & Awareness Programmes
12.8 3
Health 9.9 4
Agriculture & Food Security 9.6 5
Seawalls 9.1 6
Essential Infrastructure & Works 7.8 7
Others 7.8 8
Village Development Inspections 6.8 9
Capacity Building for Social Groups
3.4 10
The top 2 priority projects
1. Securing Community Water Resources Project2. Reforestation, Rehabilitation & Community Forestry Fir
e Prevention Project3. Climate Health Cooperation Program4. Climate Early Warning System5. Agriculture & Food Security Sustainability Project6. Zoning & Strategic Management Planning7. Implement Coastal Infrastructure Management Plans
for Highly Vulnerable District8. Establishing Conservation Programs in Highly
Vulnerable Marine & Terrestrial Areas of Communities9. Sustainable Tourism Adaptation Project
Financial Issues Uncertainty of accessibility to other funds (SCCF, SPA) Funding modalities (LDC Fund, sliding scale) Mismatch: national planning cycles & donor fiscal cycles
Other Constraints Institutional arrangements for multi-stakeholder adaptation
activities Level of synergy between projects and national structures Commitment of implementing agencies`
Lack of Data Unreliable, inconsistent env. & socio-economic data Limited and insufficient data Institutional constraints in accessing and sharing data
Institutional Capacity Capacity of institutions holding/managing databases Socio-economic data and technical tools Sci, tech’l & Instit’l capacity to implement projects
Human Capacity Technical CB to transform project profilesdetailed projects
Technical Issues and Challenges faced
Lessons Learned & Best Practices
Developing pre-synthesis sectoral reports vital to establish baseline information
Country-wide Community Consultation (Public Consultation Report) was a key player in criteria prioritization and ranking of key adaptation needs
Bottom-up approach , consensus approach
Steps taken to implement NAPA to date
National NAPA Dialogue with Development Partners EU: 4millionEURO ‘Water for Life’ Project (Samoa Water
Authority) Australia: Regional Assistance (SPREP) USA: exploring options New Zealand: LDC fund contribution
What are the expectations for implementation? Accessibility to the LDC Fund Integration of NAPA into National Communication
Learn to Adapt”
“Adapt to sustain,
Sustain to live,
Live to learn,