hearing in distance or where is that sound? today: isabelle peretz musical & non-musical brains nov....

Download Hearing in Distance Or Where is that sound? Today: Isabelle Peretz Musical & Non-musical Brains Nov. 12 noon + Lunch Rm 2068B South Building

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: doris-armstrong

Post on 18-Jan-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Results of Walk vs. Metric Greater accuracy with walking judgments –Much less variability –Overestimation of metric close distances –Underestimation of metric long distances Why did we find this result?

TRANSCRIPT

Hearing in Distance Or Where is that sound? Today: Isabelle Peretz Musical & Non-musical Brains Nov. 12 noon + Lunch Rm 2068B South Building Improving Accuracy How do listeners judge distance? Metrics of perception Absolute distance: objective scale Euclidean Egocentric distance: metric in body relations Gibsonian (J.J. Gibson*) Finding a source in distance (Russell, 2004) Experiment: test distance of a sound source meters Blindfolded walk to position or declare distance in Euclidean Units When are people better? Results of Walk vs. Metric Greater accuracy with walking judgments Much less variability Overestimation of metric close distances Underestimation of metric long distances Why did we find this result? Is It Just Experience? Judge Sound Source Walking Pull board Laying on stomach, walking on hands Metrical declaration Blindfold listening Full vision movement to source position Judge distances 2 30 meters Results with the Crawl Experiment Walk & Crawl very accurate Some underestimation at very long distances Much more variation with metric judgment Tendency for overestimation Golfers show improved accuracy judging metric distance No underestimation tendency at greater distances with body- relevant units The Affordance Paradigm Why are listeners better judging distances using body-relevant actions? Use of Affordances Gibsons simple idea World is perceived in action relevant units All perception evolved to support action Best perception when subjects interact with environment Affordances Action/body-relevant properties of the world Graspable, Eatable, Sitable, Walkable Hearing the Silent World Localization Study of sound sources Sound producing objects relative to listener Are sound sources the basis of hearing? Visual world Light producing objects Sun, lamps Light reflecting surfaces Tables, faces, trees Can we detect sound obscuring/reflecting surfaces? Hearing the Silent World Sound obstructing surfaces Diffuse sound field set behind sound attenuating surfaces Are listeners sensitive to position of surfaces? Test behavioral judgment Is the aperture large enough to allow passage? Ego-centric judgment facilitates accuracy Aperture size affects intensity, spectra Randomize intensities, sine wave signals Listeners can detect position of sound obstructing surfaces Elevation Height relative to listener How can this be determined? Interaural cues? Timing difference between the ears Mid-Saggital plane Loudness difference between the ears Absorption by head & pinna Front-back confusions Pinna cues Forward, downward facing Partially resolve front-back errors Distance How far away is a sound source? Interaural cues? Azimuth does not indicate relative distance Pinna cues? Slight-downward facing More distant cues higher in the perceptual plane Salient cues for distance Intensity Attenuation over distance Frequency dependent Unreliable indicator Reverberation Increase in number and lag of echoes DEMO