hearsay
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
HEARSAYYEAH YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT HOMESKILLET
![Page 2: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Reasons For Hearsay
• Everything testified to in a trial should be subject to cross examination
• If its an out of court statement, how can the adverse party cross examine the declarant’s statement for truthfulness?
• Make sure that each side has a chance to get their say on each matter
• ALL OF LAW IS PRETTY MUCH BASED ON THE ABOVE
![Page 3: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Rule 801: Definition
• 1. A statement is (1) an oral or written assertion or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if intended as an assertion. – Nonverbal conduct: head nodding, pointing
• A declarant is the person who makes a statement
• 2. Hearsay is a statement, other than the one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
• EVEN if the witness is the declarant- HEARSAY
![Page 4: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Statements Confused For Hearsay/ How to object
• The following statement is commonly confused for Hearsay: – Prior Statement By Witness during the Trial– This would be brought up on cross– Why is this okay?
• It is being cross examined. Both sides may put their own spin on it.
• If the witness begins to say hearsay- “Objection, Hearsay”
• If the lawyer asks a question requiring Hearsay in the answer- “Objection, Calls for Hearsay
![Page 5: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Truth of the matter asserted?
• If something is being admitted for the “truth of the matter asserted, it: – Is offered to prove a point material to the
case• To Be Hearsay:
– Out of Court Statement – Truth of the Matter Asserted
• Example: In a case about a murder in which the weather is immaterial, Declarant says: “Janie said she thought the weather was cold.” NOT HEARSAY!
![Page 6: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Examples
• “When you asked if he murdered his wife, did he respond?” “Yes, he nodded his head”. – Is this Hearsay?
• “What happened then?” “She said, ‘Hey, Bill,’. And then he attacked her.” – Is this Hearsay?
• “I told him I didn’t see anyone.” – Is this Hearsay?
![Page 7: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Rule 802: ADMISSABILITY
• Hearsay is never admissible in court…. – UNLESS you have an exception
• These exceptions are, as everything, at the mercy of the judge. Get used to them being overturned.
• Be able to quote the exact rule of your exception, you’ll look smarter… really
• Even if you know that something the other side is trying to get in is hearsay, object! They might not know!
![Page 8: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Rule 803: Exceptions When Availability of Declarant is
Immaterial• Present Sense Impression (Subsection 1):
Statement describing or explaining made while declarant was experiencing event, or immediately thereafter
• Excited Utterance (Subsection 2): A statement made by the declarant while the declarant was under the excitement caused by the event
• Then-Existing Condition (Sub. 3): Statement of declarant’s then-existing state of mind, emotion, or body
![Page 9: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Discussion Of 803, Sub 1-3
• The most crucial part of the three statements stated in previous slide:
• HOW MUCH TIME PASSED between stressful event and statement
• Person must have still been under the stress of the event
• The excitement must have destroyed the usual obstacles of the mind- the declarant must have been too affected to speak falsely
![Page 10: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
803 Exceptions Con.: Records
• Subsections 4-14 are all RECORDED DOCUMENTS or ABSENCE OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS
• Ex.- Family records, marriage statistics, vital statistics, school records, records of membership in religious organizations
• Anything that is regularly recorded, or a recording that should be there but is missing is admissible
• MACC Inventory information, perhaps?
![Page 11: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
803 Exceptions Continued: Reputations
• Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History (Sub. 19)- Opinion of the reputation of a person’s family history– the Mitchells and Monks, peut-etre...
• Reputation Concerning Boundaries of Land (Sub. 20)- Opinion as to where the boundaries of land are– MAP, anyone?
• Reputation of Character (Sub. 21)- reputation of a person’s character as judged by members of the community
![Page 12: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Rule 804: Exceptions to Hearsay When Declarant is
Unavailable• Definition of Unavailability• The Declarant is:
– Exempted by the court from testifying – Refusing to testify – Unable to be present because of death or
then-existing illness– Unable to be found – NOT unavailable if any of the above was
caused by any sort of wrongdoing on the part of the witness to keep the declarant from testifying
![Page 13: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
804 Con.- Exceptions When Availability is Material
• Previous Testimony (Subsection 1): Testimony given as a witness in any legal procedure IF the opposite party has a motive to develop the information for themselves as well
• Statement Under Belief of Impending Death (Sub. 2): Testimony made when the declarant was in genuine fear of death. Whether or not the person actually died is irrelevant
![Page 14: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
804: Exceptions Continued
• Statement Against Interest (Sub. 3): A statement so wildly against the declarant’s interest that no reasonable person would have made the statement without believing its truth. – Ex. “He told me, “Well, don’t say
anything, but I definitely lied to the insurance company.”
![Page 15: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Rule 805: Hearsay WITHIN Hearsay
•Hearsay within Hearsay is only admissible if both Hearsays have an exception.
•“He told me she’d asked him…”
![Page 16: Hearsay](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022102823/548d0ad7b479598c1b8b45b7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Rule 806: Attacking or Supporting Credibility of
Declarant• When a hearsay statement has been
admitted• It is possible for either party to attack
the credibility of the declarant (impeachment)– Evidence of a conduct that contradicted the
statement – Can basically destroy the declarant’s
character without any rules– Character evidence becomes relevant