heart failure update 2012
Post on 18-Oct-2014
2.252 views
DESCRIPTION
Heart failure update 2012 by john hakim, MDTRANSCRIPT
Heart Failure Update 2012
John Hakim MD FACCSouthern Maryland
HospitalFood for thought
Outlineof CHF Talk
Definition Pathophysiology Medical Treatment Mechanical Treatment Device Treatment Transplantation Option Future Hopes and Dreams
Definition of Heart Failure
bull HF is a complex clinical syndrome that can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill with or eject blood
In systolic heart failure the dominant feature is a reduction in cardiac output
In diastolic heart failure the dominant feature is impaired filling of the left ventricle
Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in the US
middot Approximately 5 million patients in this country have HF
middot Over 550000 patients are diagnosed with HF for the first time each year
middot Primary reason for 12 to 15 million office visits and 65 million hospital days each year
middot In 2001 nearly 53000 patients died of HF as a primary cause
Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
middot The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
middot HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
middot More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Outlineof CHF Talk
Definition Pathophysiology Medical Treatment Mechanical Treatment Device Treatment Transplantation Option Future Hopes and Dreams
Definition of Heart Failure
bull HF is a complex clinical syndrome that can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill with or eject blood
In systolic heart failure the dominant feature is a reduction in cardiac output
In diastolic heart failure the dominant feature is impaired filling of the left ventricle
Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in the US
middot Approximately 5 million patients in this country have HF
middot Over 550000 patients are diagnosed with HF for the first time each year
middot Primary reason for 12 to 15 million office visits and 65 million hospital days each year
middot In 2001 nearly 53000 patients died of HF as a primary cause
Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
middot The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
middot HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
middot More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Definition of Heart Failure
bull HF is a complex clinical syndrome that can result from any structural or functional cardiac disorder that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill with or eject blood
In systolic heart failure the dominant feature is a reduction in cardiac output
In diastolic heart failure the dominant feature is impaired filling of the left ventricle
Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in the US
middot Approximately 5 million patients in this country have HF
middot Over 550000 patients are diagnosed with HF for the first time each year
middot Primary reason for 12 to 15 million office visits and 65 million hospital days each year
middot In 2001 nearly 53000 patients died of HF as a primary cause
Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
middot The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
middot HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
middot More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in the US
middot Approximately 5 million patients in this country have HF
middot Over 550000 patients are diagnosed with HF for the first time each year
middot Primary reason for 12 to 15 million office visits and 65 million hospital days each year
middot In 2001 nearly 53000 patients died of HF as a primary cause
Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
middot The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
middot HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
middot More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
middot The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
middot HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
middot More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
middot The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
middot HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
middot More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
New York Heart Association Classification
Class I Physical activity is not limited and does not cause significant fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class II Physical activity is somewhat limited You are comfortable at rest but ordinary activity causes fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class III Physical activity is markedly limited You are comfortable at rest but less-than-ordinary activities cause fatigue heart palpitations trouble breathing or chest pain
Class IV All physical activity causes discomfort Symptoms also are present at rest Minor physical activity always makes symptoms worse
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Prognosis
Class IV has 30 to 70 annual mortality
Class III has 10 to 20 annual mortality
Class II has 5 to 10 annual mortality
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Character of Heart failure
Signs and symptoms of intravascular and interstitial volume overload including shortness of breath rales and edema
Manifestations of inadequate tissue perfusion such as impaired exercise tolerance fatigue and renal dysfunction
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Right Sided Heart failure
Fluid retention without dyspnea or rales
Often associated with weight gain dilation of the right ventricle
The focus of this talk is Chronic Left Sided Heart failure
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Types of Left sided Heart failure
Systolic dysfunction- reduced LV ejection fraction
Diastolic dysfunction- increased ventricular stiffness or impaired myocardial relaxation Often with preserved LV ejection fraction
Physiologic states where the heart cannot compensate for increased circulation or metabolic requirements (Regurgitatant valvular disease intra cardiac shunts disorders of heart rate or rhythm)
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Causes of CHF
Structural abnormalities (congenital or acquired) that affect the peripheral and coronary arterial circulation pericardium myocardium or cardiac valves thus leading to the increased hemodynamic burden or myocardial or coronary insufficiency responsible for heart failure
Fundamental causes comprising the biochemical and physiological mechanisms through which either an increased hemodynamic burden or a reduction in oxygen delivery to the myocardium results in impairment of myocardial contraction and
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Etiology of Heart failure
Any condition that causes myocardial necrosis or chronic pressure or volume overload can cause CHF
Hypertension is a factor in 75 of patients
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
Fatigue or inability to exercise well having less energy feeling more tired than usual
Dyspnea at rest or exertion Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea shortness of breath while sleeping or
that wakes you at night Orthopnea-Shortness of breath while lying down gets worse when you lie flat Cough ndash can be wet or dry with crackles and usually worse with lying
down
Weight gain bull Swelling in the feet or ankles usually worse at the end of the day or
after standing for long periods shoes may no longer fitbull Sometimes edma is painful but usually pressure indents the skin bull Abdominal swelling with decreased appetite and decreased muscle
strenght (Cardiac Chachectia)bull Abdominal distention (Ascites) usually a sign of right heart failure
Urination bull frequent urination usually at night Increased urination (Due to high
BNP)
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Signs of heart failure
Exertional dyspnea Orthopnea Gallup sounds Lung Crepitations Pulmonary edema Edema
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
Caused by rapid fluid buildup in the lungs (congestion pulmonary edema) Symptoms develop suddenly and may include
Severe shortness of breath An irregular or rapid heartbeat Coughing up foamy pink mucus
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
COMMON CAUSES OFSYSTOLIC FAILURE
Ischemic Heart disease and Prior MI account for
23 of systolic heart failure Essential Hypertension is a major cause of
ischemic and non ischemic systolic heart failure Hypertension increases afterload and accelerates
the progression of heart failure HTN causes chronic pressure overload
Other causes of Non ischemic heart failure aregenetic diseases Toxicdrug induced Immune mediated infiltrative process Metabolic disorders
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
All-cause Mortality vs LVEF (Median 29)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
LVEFlt30
LVEFge30
p=0005 vs LVEFlt30
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Cause of Systolic Heart failureAcquired vs Genetic Causes
bull Acquired Causesbull Hypertensionbull Diabetesbull Dyslipidemiabull Valvular heart diseasebull Coronary or peripheral vascular
diseasebull Myopathybull Rheumatic feverbull Mediastinal irradiationbull Sleep Apneabull Exposure to cardiotoxic agents
(Adrianomycin Danaurubicin Embrel)
bull Current and past alcohol consumption
bull Smokingbull Collagen vascular diseasebull Exposure to sexually transmitted
diseasesbull Thyroid disorderbull Pheochromocytomabull Obesity
Genetic Causes Predisposition to
atherosclerotic disease or Valvular disease
(Hx of MIs strokes PAD) Sudden cardiac death Myopathy Conduction system disease
(need for pacemaker) Tachyarrhythmia Cardiomyopathy
(unexplained HF) Skeletal Myopathy
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Complications of Chronic Heart failure
An irregular heartbeat leading to death (VT)
A stroke leading to death A heart attack leading to death Deep vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism Anemia Cognitive impairment Mitral valve regurgitation
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Common test ordered in CHF
medical history and a physical exam Lab testsElectrocardiogram Chest X-ray EchocardiogramBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) TSH Nuclear stress testMUGA Cardiac catheterization
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Diastolic Heart Failure
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
Patients with symptoms and signs of Heart Failure with normal systolic function and diastolic dysfunctionbull 30 to 50 of patients with Heart failure
symptoms have normal LV systolic function bull Abnormal LV filling and elevated filling
pressuresbull Usually due to Impaired relaxation of the LV
and increased stiffness of the cardiac muscle
Most prevalent in patients over 75 years old
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Jackson G et al BMJ 2000320167-170
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
Pathologic Myocardial hypertrophybull HTN Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Aging Ischemic fibrosis Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
bull Infiltrative disorders (Amyloid Sarcoid)bull Storage Diseases (Hemochromatosis)
Endomyocardial disorders Valvular heart disease
bull (obstructive or regurgitation)
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
DIASTOLIC HEART FAILUREusually due to Hemodynamic stress
Patients with diastolic heart failure do not tolerate hemodynamic stress well
Atrial fibrillation causes loss of atrial contraction and often leads to Diastolic CHF
Tachycardia shortens diastole and leads to CHF Elevation in BP worsens myocardial relaxation Ischemia worsens diastolic function raising
LA and PA pressures (This is why ischemia causes SOB)
Aortic Stenosis causes worsening diastolic function
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Diastolic CHFAll treatments are empiric
(No trial data)
2005 ACCAHA guidelines supports 4 treatments of diastolic CHFbull Control of systolic and diastolic HTNbull Control of atrial rate in patients with A
fibbull Control of pulmonary congestion and
edema with diureticsbull Coronary revascularization of patients
with CAD where ischemia causes worse diastolic function
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Edema
Treatmentbull Loop diuretics (furosemide)
Both immediate action to dilate pulmonary arteries and longer action to diurese
bull Afterload Reduction Nitrates Morphine Ace inhibitors (Captopril enalapril etc)
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Systolic Heart Failure
The ballooning of the Heart
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Copyright copy2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Heart Failure Pathophysiology (the whole body participates)
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Neurohormonal activation
Decreased cardiac output activates many neuro-hormonal compensatory systems that in the short term act to preserve circulatory hemostasis and maintain arterial pressure
When in excess these systems play a role in worsening of CHF
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure
What Improves Survival ACE inhibitors Beta Blockers Spironolactone (Aldactone)
Eplenrone (Inspira) -Hydralazine and Nitrates (V-Heft) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) Device Therapy (AICD)
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
DIURETICS
Sodium and Water retention are the hallmark of CHF and diuretics are mandatory treatment for patients with pulmonary or Peripheral edema
Patients with CHF should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily and seek advice if a weigh gain of more than 15kg in 24 hrs
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Why give ACE inhibitors
Directics activate the Renin Angiotensis system and should be given in combination with and ACE inhibitor
Correction of fluid overload with diuretics should be undertaken before starting an ACE inhibitor
Adding an ACE inhibitor to a patient on high dose diuretic may result in significant first dose hypotension
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
ACE-INHIBITORS
ACE inhibitors relieve symptoms reduce hospitalizations and improve survival in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure and should be used regardless of the severity of CHF
Patients with the lowest EF derive the greatest benefits from ACE inhibitors
The evidence that ACE inhibitors improve survival and symptomatic wellbeing is incontrovertible
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Beta Blocker- Why do they work
In heart failure the nervous system is over stimulated Norepinephrine levels rise
Increased levels of circulating norepinephrine cause heart remodeling and arrhythmias
High levels of norepinephrine are directly toxic to heart cells and increase risk of death
Beta Blockers ndash block the toxic effect of nervous system over stimulation and norepinephrine
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Normal
The Normal Heart is a b1-Organ That Functions in a b1 -Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Normal Heart failure
Heart Failure Converts the Circulation From a b1- to a b1b2 a1- Environment
b1
b1
b1 b2
b1
b1
b2
b1
b1b1
b1 b1b1
b2
b1
b1 b1
b2
b1
b1
b1
b2b2
b1 b2b1 b2a1
a1
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
NE NE
NE
Cardiac cell toxicity
Carvedilol
b1 b2 a1
Metoprolol
Cofactors
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
[123I]mIBG Planar Imaging for Cardiac Assessment
Normal innervation NHYA Class II NYHA Class IV
Quantitation of cardiac uptake of [123I]mIBG expressed in terms of the ratio of countspixel between regions of interest (ROIs) drawn around the heart (H) and in the upper mediastinum (M) the HM ratio
HM ratio 22 17 11
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Results of Direct Comparison Trials withMetoprolol and Carvedilol in CHF Patients
LV EjectionFraction ()
0
+2
+4
+6
+8
+10
+12
Metoprolol(n=123)
Carvedilol(n=125)
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141(6)899-907
P = 0009
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
BETA-BLOCKERS
BETA-BLOCKERS inhibit the adverse effects of chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system acting on the myocardium
Patients with minimal symptoms (NYHA 2) derive little symptomatic benefit from beta blockers
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
BETA-BLOCKERS
Beta-BLOCKERS approved for the management of CHF are Carvedilol Metoprolol and bisoprolol
All three drugs have been shown to prolong survival but they are not the same
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Primary Argument Supporting the Belief That Only b1 -Blockade is Important
Mortality results in earlier large-scale trials
MERIT-HF (metoprolol) 34 in risk
CIBIS-2 (bisoprolol) 34 in risk
COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 35 in risk
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Usualantisympathetic blockade
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
More than usualantisympathetic blockade
Less than usualantisympathetic blockade
Usualantisympathetic blockade
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
b-1 + b-2andor a-1
060 080 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
050 075 100b-blocker
betterb-blocker
worse
b-1 only
b-blockerswith ISA
D = 13 D = 13
32 Post-InfarctionTrials (n=26580)
27 Heart FailureTrials (n=15851)
125
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Metoprolol
(selective blockade)
Carvedilol
(comprehensive blockade)
Baseline
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Metoprolol tartrate
Carvedilol
3125 mg BID
Baseline
625 mg BID
125 mg BID
1020 deaths
COMET Study Design
5 mg BID
125 mg BID
25 mg BID
3029 ptsclass II-III CHF
LVEF lt 35
25 mg BID
50 mg BID
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Packer M et al Am Heart J 2001141884ndash888
+ 12
+ 6
0
ndash 6
ndash 12
ndash 18
ndash 24
P=009 P=072
LV EjectionFraction ()
LV End-DiastolicVolume (mLm2)
+ 12
+ 10
+ 8
+ 6
+ 4
+ 2
0
Metoprolol (n=123)
Carvedilol (n=125)
Mean duration 875 mos
Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
COMET(Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
Compares comprehensive 1- 2- 1-blockade with carvedilol to 1-selective blockade with metoprolol tartrate
Prespecified end points all-cause mortality combined risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization
More than 3000 patients with class IIndashIV heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic Cardiomyopathybull With over 1020 events COMET is the largest
trial ever conducted in heart failure Intended follow-up was at least 35 years
bull 10000 patient-years makes COMET the longest trial ever conducted in heart failure
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Randomized(No run-in phase)
3029 patients with stable heart failure New York Heart AssociationClass IIndashIV receiving standard treatment including ACE inhibitors
Time to 1020 deathsEstimated to be 4 to 6 years
Screening Titration to maximum tolerated
or target dose
(Start carvedilol 3125 mg bid metoprolol tartrate 5 mg bid)
Assessments every 4 months during maintenance phase
(n1500) Metoprolol 50 mg bid
(n1500) Carvedilol 25 mg bid
Poole-Wilson PA et al Eur J Heart Fail 20024321ndash329 Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
COMET Study Design
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Time (years)
Per
cen
tag
e M
ort
alit
y (
)
0
10
20
30
40
0 1 2 3 4 5
Relativerisk
95 CI P value
Carvedilol vs Metoprolol
083 074ndash093 0017
Metoprolol
Carvedilol
Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
macr17Risk reduction
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
COMET Median Survival
Carvedilol 80 yearsMetoprolol 66 years
Carvedilol prolonged median survival by 14 years beyond that achieved with metoprolol
Assuming constant hazard
Poole-Wilson PA et al Lancet 20033627ndash13
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
ALDOSTERONE RECEPTORS WITHINTHE HEART MEDIATE FIBROSIS
HYPERTROPHY AND ARRHYTHMOGENESIS
REDUCTION IN ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND SYMPTOMATIC RELIEF IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CHF AT DOSES 25MGMDAY
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Spironolactone and Epelnerone
HYPERKALAEMIAPARTICULARLY WHEN USED WITH ACE-INHIBITORSATRAs
IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTIONMONITORING OF POTASSIUM LEVELS ESSENTIAL
USED IN COMBINATION WITH ACEINHIBITORLOOP DIURETIC +-DIGOXIN
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Digoxin
BLOCKAGE OF THE SODIUMPOTASSIUM ATPase PUMP RESULTS IN INCREASED INOTROPIC RESPONSIVENESS
THE DATA SUGGESTS THAT DIGOXIN HAS NO INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL BUT REDUCES HOSPITALISATION AND IMPROVED THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF MANY PATIENTS
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
Digoxin improves Symptoms and prevents hospitalizations in men but not women
Niseritide (Natracor) induces diuresis and improves symptoms but does not improve longevity
Amiodarone helps prevent arrythmic events
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart Failure Device Treatment
Bi-Ventricular pacemaker helps improve cardiac output and improves symptoms sometimes
Automatic Implantable Defibrillator improves survival in patients with EF less than 35 (Better than drug therapy alone)
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
Bristow MR et al Paper presented at American College of Cardiology March 31 2003 Chicago Ill
12-monthOPT Event Rate(1-y) = 190
P=12 CRT vs OPT
P=002 CRT-D vs OPT
12-month event rate reductionsCRT = by 239CRT-D = by 434
Any Death
P
atie
nts
Eve
nt-
Fre
e
Days from Randomization
0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080
60
50
70
80
90
100
CRT = cardiac resynchronization therapy CRT-D = cardiac resynchronization therapy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator OPT = optimal drug therapy
CRT-D
OPT
CRT
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
100
80
60
40
20
00000 6 12 18 24 30
No at Risk
LV assist device
Medical therapy68 18 22 11 5 1
61 27 11 4 3 0
Months
Su
rviv
al (
)
Medical therapy
LV assist device
Rose EA N Engl J Med 20013451435ndash1443
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart Transplant Waiting ListJanuary 9th 2012
73 people Washington DC metropolitan area waiting for heart transplant
3155 people In USA waiting for heart Transplant
2011 1760 patients on the heart wait list received heart transplants That figure represents a decrease from the 2333 hearts transplanted in 2010 and the 2211 in 2009
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Heart Transplantation There were 2125 heart transplants performed in
the United States in 2005 and 2016 in 2004 Each year thousands more adults would benefit
from a heart transplant if more donated hearts were available
In the United States 724 percent of heart transplant patients are male 700 percent are white 191 percent are ages 35-49 and 450 percent are ages 50-64
As of Aug 11 2006the one-year survival rate was 861 percent for males and 839 percent for females the three-year survival rate was about 783 percent for males and 749 percent for females The five-year survival rate was 712 percent for males and 669 percent for females
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Markers of Heart Failure
Identify Markers and we can better treat the disease
Albumin BNP Chest to HEART MIBG ratio- a marker for denervation of the
heart and loss of sympathic tone- assessment of myocardial sympathetic innervation as determined by the heart to mediastinum (HM) ratio on planar 123I‑mIBG imaging as either normal (gt16) or abnormal (lt16) for identifying HF subjects at higher risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
UACR= urinary albumin to creatinine ratio Macroalbuminuria=UACR gt25 mgmmol Microalbuminuria=UACR 25ndash250 mgmmol (men) or 35ndash250 mgmmol (women)compared with normoalbuminuria (UACRlt25 mgmmol) n=1349
End point Microalbuminuria n=704
Macroalbuminuria n=257
Per 100-mgmmol UACR increment
CV death or HF hospitalization
143 (121ndash169) 175 (139ndash220) 107(100ndash114)
All-cause mortality
162 (132ndash199) 176 (132ndash2middot35) 108(100ndash117)
HF hospitalization
131 (107ndash159) 167 (128ndash2middot17) 107 099ndash115)
Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analysis from CHARM Study)
Adjusted hazard ratios (95 CI) for clinical outcomes by degree of albuminuria (defined by UACR with cut points and as continuous variable) in CHARM
Jackson CE et al Lancet 2009 374543ndash550
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140)
SurvivalProbability
Time (days)
ltMedianLess than 140 BNP
gtMedianGreater Than 140BNP
plt000001
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
HM=096Died at 8 moHF Progression
HM=138
Died at 8 mo SCD (No ICD)
HM=167
No event
1 2 3
Three Patients with NYHA Class II HF and LVEF between 20 and 25 Patient 1 has highly elevated BNP (gt1000) BNP in patients 2 and 3 is normal (lt100)
Based upon the results of ADMIRE-HF 2-year cardiac mortality risk for patient 1 is 10 times that of patient 3(IF your Chest to HEART MIBG ratio is greater than 16 you donrsquot die)
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
All-cause Mortality vs BNP (Median 140) amp HM
Time (days)
BNPgt140amp HM ge160
BNPgt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HMlt160
BNPlt140amp HM ge160
SurvivalProbability
p=0024 vs BNPgt140 amp HM ge160
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Current and Future Therapies
Drugs CHF disease
management programs
Resynchronizatin therapy + ICD
Renal Denervation
ultrafiltration does not work if diuretic resistant
LVADs bull Total artificial heart
Cardiac transplantbull (batistacardiomyoplast
y amp ldquoacornrdquo does not work)
Early-stage Treatment Late-stage Treatment
Resynchronization therapy is an effective early-stage therapy
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the Kidney
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
-1162012 AHA Encouraging two-year follow-up from the Stem Cell Infusion in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO) trial
-c-KIT-positive Ccardiac stem Cells in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF lt40) following an MI In the trial the cells were harvested from the patients right atrial appendage isolated and expanded and then infused to repair an infarction during coronary bypass surgery
-Echocardiography showed the average LVEF in the 18 patients treated with the CSC infusion increased from 290 before infusion to 360 (p lt0001) four months after the procedure During that period LVEF improved only from 292 to 294 in 13 control patients
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
eecp
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
EECP Reduced frequency or complete elimination of
angina symptoms Better ability to exercise free from chest pain and
breathlessness Decrease in need for anti-angina nitrate
medication Clinical tests show Decreased exercise-induced signs of angina on
ECG (prolonged time to ST depression on exercise stress testing)
Increased blood supply to heart muscle demonstrated by myocardial perfusion scan techniques before and after EECP (Technetium scan Cardiovascular MRI stress ECHO)
Improvement of EF in some Patients
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
Heart Transplantation- A viable option for a select few patients
Left Ventricular Assist devices and the Artificial heart are available options and used mainly as a bridge to transplant and not destination therapy
Stem cell transplantation and myocaridal cell imlantation have not yet proven viable
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASENumber of Transplants Reported
ORGANTransplants Reported from 712006 through
6302007
Total Transplants Reported through
6302007
Heart 3114 80106
Heart-Lung 63 3341
Lung 2099 25950
ISHLT 2008J Heart Lung Transplant 200827 937-983
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
The HeartMateII is a continuous flow cardiac assist device Heart surgeon Bud Frazier and his team are working with two such devices to develop a continuous flow artificial heart (Courtesy Texas Heartreg Institute)
Artificial Heart
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD and HF
Control Volume Improve Clinical Outcomes
DiureticsRenal ReplacementTherapy
Digoxin
-BlockerACEIor ARB
AldosteroneAntagonist
or ARB
Treat Residual Symptoms
CRT an ICD
HDZNISDNIn selected patients
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Drugs to avoid in heart failure
NSAID ndash I buprophen( Advil Motrin) Naproxen ( Alieve Naprosyn) Cox-2 inhibitors (Celebrex)
The NSAID can cause kidney to retain salt and water and Interfere with ACEARB class
Use Acetemenphen Or Narcotics instead for pain and aches
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Anti-Arrhythmics in Class 1 ( Sodium Blockers and Class 3 ( Potassium Channel blockers)
The only heart rhythm drugs safe in Systolic dysfuction are Amiodarone and Dofeditilide (Tikosyn)
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Drugs to Avoid in CHF
Avoid Non Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel blockers
Non- dihydropridine Calcium Channel blockers (Verapamil amp Diltiazem) decrease the strength of myocardial contractility and decrease heart rate
Verapamil and Diltiazem can worsen Heart failure and do not improve survival
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hypertensives
Amlodipine and Felodipine have not been shown to decrease survival in heart failure
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
KaplanndashMeier Plots of the Time to the First Primary Event (Death or Cardiovascular Morbidity) among 571 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Receiving Amlodipine and 582 Receiving Placebo
Packer M et al N Engl J Med 19963351107-1114
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Drugs to Avoid In CHF Antacids that contain sodium (salt) To relieve heartburn or
indigestion Why Just like eating salty foods sodium from medications can cause
your body to retain fluid making swelling and shortness of breath worse and raising blood pressure
Alternatives Some companies produce low-sodium antacids Look at the ingredients list and warning statements to see if sodium is listed (companies are required to put it on the label if there are 5 mg or more of sodium per dose) If you are not sure ask your doctor or pharmacist
Other Drugs to Avoid Decongestants containing pseudoephedrine (such as Sudafed) which
can raise blood pressure and force the heart to work harder Alcohol and illicit drugs they are a common cause of hospitalization for
heart failure Some nutritional supplements and growth hormone therapies (talk to
your doctor about any you are considering taking)
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
Pain relievers called NSAIDs Ibuprofen such as Advil and Motrin Naproxen such as Aleve Aspirin such as Bayer
bull If your doctor has told you to take a low-dose aspirin every day for your heart problems its probably okay to take it Low-dose aspirin can help prevent blood clots and may prevent a stroke or a heart attack
bull Higher doses of aspirin may make your heart failure worse Do not take aspirin for pain such as from headaches or arthritis Use acetaminophen such as Tylenol instead
Pain relievers Celecoxib Etodolac Indomethacin Ibuprofen Ketoprofen Nabumetone Naproxen Piroxicam Sulindac
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Drugs to Avoid in heart failure Cold cough flu or sinus medicines Be sure to check the label Do not take medicines that contain
pseudoephedrine ephedrine phenylephrine or oxymetazoline such as bull Sudafedbull Nose sprays (decongestants) such as Afrin and Dristanbull Herbal remedies such as ma huang and Herbalife
Make sure your cough and cold medicines dont contain aspirin or ibuprofen
Antiarrhythmics These are drugs used to treat a fast or uneven heart rhythm You may
need to avoid the following bull Disopyramidebull Dofetilidebull Flecainidebull Procainamide bull Propafenonebull Quinidinebull Sotalol
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Drugs not to take with Heart failure
Antacids or laxatives that contain sodium Check the label for sodium or saline Examples include
bull Antacids such as Alka-Seltzer bull Laxatives such as Fleet Phospho-Soda
Calcium channel blockers People with a certain kind of heart failure may need to avoid the
following medicines bull Diltiazem bull Verapamil
If you need to take a calcium channel blocker for another health problem such as high blood pressure your doctor will watch your health carefully
Certain diabetes medicines Most diabetes drugs are safe to take but you may need to avoid the
following bull Metformin bull Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone1 ( Avandaia and ACTOS)
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
The largest randomized double-blind trial to date has confirmed what smaller studies have suggested and what many physicians have long believed a daily multivitamin does not reduce the risk of CVD
Physcians Health Study II results presented at AHA Nov 2012 PHS II launched in 1997 with a total of 14 641 US male physicians
age 50 or older at the outset randomized to different vitamin arms or placebo The other three arms of the studymdashlooking at beta-carotene vitamin E or vitamin C
Over a median follow-up of 112 years 1732 CV events occurred but the rate of events was no higher among men taking placebo than those taking a daily multivitamin
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work 1142012 AHA meeting- Ultrafiltration was associated with
worsening renal function and more severe adverse events compared with optimum drug therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure in the CARRESS-HF trial
CARRESS-HF trial involved 188 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal failure who were randomized to stepped pharmacological care or ultrafiltration The primary end point was change in serum creatinine and change in weight (reflecting fluid offload) at 96 hours
-similar weight loss occurred in both groups (average about 12 pounds) but while there was little change in creatinine levels in the drug-treated group there was a significant increase in creatinine in the ultrafiltration group There was no difference between the two groups in death or hospitalization for heart failure but there were more severe adverse events in the ultrafiltration group (72 vs 57) mainly due to kidney failure Bleeding and and IV-catheter-related complications
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
What doesnrsquot HelpAliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
November 3 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine
Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardio-Renal Endpoints (ALTITUDE) trial testing Aliskiren (Tekturna Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as an adjunct to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade
The drug not only failed to provide benefit to patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV and renal events but may actually have been harmful
In ALTITUDE 8561 patients were randomly assigned to aliskiren (n=4274) or placebo (n=4287) on a background of an ACE inhibitor or ARB for approximately four years
The primary end point was a composite of CV death resuscitation from sudden death nonfatal MI or stroke unplanned hospitalization for heart failure ESRD or renal death or a doubling of serum creatinine for at least one month
There was no statistical difference in the primary end point between the treatment groups but the aliskiren group experienced more adverse events especially hyperkalemia and hypertension
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
ACC- 2010 - Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure(ASCEND-HF) there was no evidence for a major benefit from nesiritide vs placebo on top of standard care
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Primary results and renal-function safety end point in ASCEND-HF IV nesiritide in ADHF
ASCEND-HF-
End points Placebo () n=3511 Nesiritide () n=3496 p
30-d deathHF hospitalization 101 94 031
bull30-d death 40 36
bull30-d HF rehospitalization 61 60
Dyspnea at 6 h 421 445 0030
bullModerately better 287 295
bullMarkedly better 134 150
Dyspnea at 24 h 661 682 0007
bullModerately better 386 378
bullMarkedly better 275 304
gt25 decrease eGFR 295 314 011
a Condashprimary end pointseGFR=estimated glomerular filtration
rate
Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure 1142010 American Heart Association
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
The EndQuestions
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32)
HF Risk Factor Treatment Goals
Risk Factor Goal
Hypertension Generally lt 13080
Diabetes See ADA guidelines1
Hyperlipidemia See NCEP guidelines2
Inactivity 20-30 min aerobic 3-5 x wk
Obesity Weight reduction lt 30 BMI
Alcohol Men le 2 drinksday women le 1
Smoking Cessation
Dietary Sodium Maximum 2-3 gday 1Diabetes Care 2006 29 S4-S42
2JAMA 2001 2852486-97
Adapted from
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Common precursors of chronic heart failure
bullCoronary artery disease (for example consequent upon acute myocardial infarction) bullChronic hypertension bullCardiomyopathy (for example dilated hypertrophic alcoholic and idiopathic) bullValve dysfunction (for example diseases of the aortic and mitral valve) bullCardiac arrhythmiasconduction disturbance (for example heart block and atrial fibrillation) bullPericardial disease (for example constrictive pericarditis) bullInfection (for example rheumatic fever Chagas disease viral myocarditis and HIV
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
History of Beta Blockade for CHF
1993 The Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Trial studied 383 patients with class 2-3 CHF for 18 months The target dose of immediate-release metoprolol was 100 to 150mg per day The metoprolol group showed reduced all-cause mortality compared to the placebo group but the difference was small
The major benefit was in need for heart transplant Two metoprolol patients needed a heart transplant but 19 in the placebo group did Metoprolol improved EF quality of life and exercise capacity compared to placebo
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTSWITH COMORBIDITIES
1048708 AFTER MI-USE IN ALL PATIENTS WITHOUT A CONTRAINDICATION 1048708 COPD IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION UNLESS THERE IS SEVERE REACTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE 1048708 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-USE LOWER DOSES OF METOPROLOL OR BISOPROLOL 1048708 DIABETIC PATIENTS DERIVE SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT-CARVEDILOL MAY BE PREFERRED
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Digoxin 1048708 BLOOD LEVEL MONITORING REQUIRED 1048708 LEVELS FOR HEART FAILURE ARE USUALLY 05-08NGMl FOR HEART FAILURE AND UP TO 2NGML FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION 1048708 DOSE DEPENDS ON DEGREE OF RENAL FUNCTION 1048708 LOADING DOSES REQUIRED FOR MORE RAPID RESPONSE 1048708 MONITOR FOR NAUSEA AND VOMITING WHICH ARE OFTEN EARLY SIGNS OF TOXICITY
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Treatment of Diastolic CHF
APART FROM A FEW EXCEPTIONSDATA FROM LONG TERMINVESTIGATIONS OF ANY AGENTCOMPARED TO PLACEBO INPATIENTS WITH DIASTOLIC FAILUREARE LACKING
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Diastolic CHF
REDUCTION IN LFT VENTRICULAR FILLING PRESSURES WITH THE USE OF DIURETICS ANDOR NITRATES
SLOWING OF THE HEART RATE WITH BETABLOCKERS AND OR RATE LIMITING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS SUCH AS VERAPAMIL (WHICH IS GENERALLY CONTRAINDICATED IN SYSTOLIC FAILURE)
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Diastolic CHF
RECENT STUDY WITH CANDERSARTANIN PATIENTS WITH LVEFgt40DEMONSTRATED A SIGNIFICANTREDUCTION IN HOSPITALISATIONSFOR HEART FAILURE THERE WAS NOSIGNIFIACNT DIFFERENCE IN THE RISKOF STROKES OR MYOCARDIALINFARCTION
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-
Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis of ADHERE data shows
Three variables are the strongest predictors of mortality in hospitalized ADHF patients
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
BUN gt 43 mgdL
Systolic blood pressure lt 115 mmHg
Serum creatinine gt 275 mgdL
Fonarow GC et al JAMA 2005293572-80
- Heart Failure Update 2012
- Outline of CHF Talk
- Slide 3
- Definition of Heart Failure
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in t
- Heart failure is a major cause of Hospitalization
- Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
- New York Heart Association Classification
- Slide 11
- Prognosis
- Character of Heart failure
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Right Sided Heart failure
- Slide 17
- Types of Left sided Heart failure
- Causes of CHF
- Etiology of Heart failure
- Classical Symptoms of Heart Failure
- Signs of heart failure
- Slide 23
- Acute Heart Failure Symptoms
- COMMON CAUSES OF SYSTOLIC FAILURE
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Cause of Systolic Heart failure Acquired vs Genetic Causes
- Complications of Chronic Heart failure
- Common test ordered in CHF
- Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE
- Slide 33
- Slide 34
- Pathogenesis of Diastolic Heart Failure
- DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE usually due to Hemodynamic stress
- Diastolic CHF All treatments are empiric (No trial data)
- Diastolic Heart Failure often presents with Acute Pulmonary Ede
- Systolic Heart Failure
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- Neurohormonal activation
- Slide 44
- Medical Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure What Improves Survi
- DIURETICS
- Why give ACE inhibitors
- ACE-INHIBITORS
- Beta Blocker- Why do they work
- Slide 50
- Slide 51
- Slide 52
- Slide 53
- Slide 54
- BETA-BLOCKERS
- BETA-BLOCKERS (2)
- Slide 57
- Slide 58
- Slide 59
- Slide 60
- Slide 61
- Slide 62
- Slide 63
- COMET Study Design
- COMET Study Design (2)
- Comparison of Carvedilol With Metoprolol on LV Function
- COMET (Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial)
- COMET Study Design (3)
- Effect of Carvedilol vs Metoprolol on Mortality
- COMET Median Survival
- Slide 71
- EPHESUS TRIAL Inspra
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone
- Spironolactone and Epelnerone (2)
- Slide 75
- Digoxin
- Heart Failure-Medical Treatment
- Heart Failure Device Treatment
- COMPANION Secondary End Point of All-cause Mortality
- REMATCH-LVADs in Extremely Severe Heart Failure
- People Donrsquot want and LVAD they want a Heart
- Heart Transplant Waiting List
- Heart Transplantation
- Markers of Heart Failure
- Albumin excretion is prognostic marker in heart failure (Analys
- Slide 86
- Slide 87
- Slide 88
- Current and Future Therapies
- Curing Heart failure by curing hypertension- Denervating the K
- Slide 91
- Stem Cells trial Shows Promise for Ischemic heart failure
- Balloon Pump to augment Coronary Perfusion
- eecp
- EECP
- Future Horizons and Pipe Dreams
- Worldwide REGISTRY DATABASE Number of Transplants Reported
- Artificial Heart
- Evidence-Based Treatment Across the Continuum of Systolic LVD a
- Drugs to avoid in heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- Drugs to Avoid in CHF
- 15 Dihydropiridines are neutral in Heart failure as Anti-hyper
- Slide 104
- Slide 105
- Drugs to Avoid In CHF
- Other drugs to Avoid in Heart failure
- Drugs to Avoid in heart failure
- Drugs not to take with Heart failure
- Biggest Myth Vitamins prevent CVD risk or heart failure risk
- Ultrafiltration- doesnrsquot work
- Slide 112
- What doesnrsquot Help Aliskarin for dual ARB-Renin Blocade
- Neseritide- Doesnrsquot make a difference
- Slide 115
- The End Questions
- HFSA 2010 Practice Guideline (32) HF Risk Factor Treatment Goa
- Slide 118
- Slide 119
- Slide 120
- Slide 121
- Slide 122
- Slide 123
- Common precursors of chronic heart failure
- Slide 125
- Slide 126
- History of Beta Blockade for CHF
- USING BETA BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH COMORBIDITIES
- Digoxin (2)
- Treatment of Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF
- Diastolic CHF (2)
- Predictors of Mortality Based on Analysis of ADHERE Database
-