heavy flavour physics news from the tevatron
DESCRIPTION
Heavy Flavour Physics News from the Tevatron. Wendy Taylor for the CDF and D Ø Collaborations. APS/AAPT 2010 , Washington, DC, February 13-16, 2010. The b Quark as a Physics Probe. Primary vertex. Where is the antimatter in the Universe? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Heavy Flavour PhysicsNews from the Tevatron
Wendy Taylor
for the CDF and DØ Collaborations
APS/AAPT 2010, Washington, DC, February 13-16, 2010
• Where is the antimatter in the Universe?• Why are there 3 generations of matter? (only 3?)• How does the strong force bind quarks into hadrons?• How does the electroweak force cause hadrons to decay?
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 2
The b Quark as a Physics ProbePrimary vertex
B decay vertexDisplaced track
• Why study B physics at the Tevatron?– Large rate:
– Tevatron energy sufficient to create states not accessible at the e+e- B factories
• However, backgrounds are large:
The Tevatron is a B Factory
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 3
bbbpp 30)(
310/ inelasticbb
Run II Tevatron Proton-Antiproton Collider
• s=1.96 TeV• L = 2.51032cm-2 s-
1 • Ldt = 50 pb-1 per
week
Main Injector
Tevatron
DØCDF
Chicago
p source
Booster
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 4
Detectors
· Excellent muon and tracking coverage high yields
Extended muon system ||<2.0 Tracking up to ||<3.0
• Solenoid and muon toroid polarities flipped every two weeks
· Excellent mass resolution· Particle ID: p, K and by dE/dx and
TOF · L1 trigger on displaced two-track
objects
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 5
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 6
• Flavour-changing neutral current decays are highly suppressed in the SM as they do not occur at tree-level (i.e., lowest order)
• New physics (e.g., SUSY, technicolour, 4th generation*) might occur in internal loops– Could enhance the branching fractions significantly– Could also affect the angular distributions
B(u,d,s)→+-h FCNC Decays
* W.-S. Hou et al., PRD 76 016004 (2007)
B(u,d,s)→+-h Decays• Trigger on two muons in 4.4 fb-1
• Final offline selection uses neural network • Use unbinned maximum log-likelihood fit
to invariant mass• CDFnote 10047
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 7
8.5 9.7 6.3
KKB
KKKB
KB
s
,
,0
0*0*0
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 8
B(u,d,s)→+-h Decays• SM predicts Br ~ O(10-6)• Use as normalization channel for branching
fraction to avoid many systematic uncertainties
• Precision competitive to world average values:
• First ever measurement:
– The rarest measured Bs0 decay!
– Theoretical prediction of 1.6110-6 (Geng and Liu, J.Phys.G29:1103-1118,2003) agrees well
hJB /
60*0
6
10)](09.0)(14.006.1[)(
10)](03.0)(05.038.0[)(
syststatKB
syststatKB
BB
615.013.0
0*0
608.007.0
10]05.1[)(
10]52.0[)(
KB
KB
BB
60 10)](46.0)(33.044.1[)( syststatBs B
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 9
B0→K*0+- Decays• K*0 forward-backward asymmetry AFB
– µ is helicity angle between µ+ direction and the opposite of the B direction in the dimuon rest frame
• K*0 longitudinal polarization FL from angle K between the kaon and the B direction in the K*0 rest frame
• Divide data into 6 bins of q2=m2(µ+µ-)c2
))(θ,Γ(q))(θ,Γ(q))(θ,Γ(q))(θ,Γ(q
)(qAμμ
μμFB 0cos0cos
0cos0cos22
222
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 10
B0→K*0+- Decays• Precision is competitive with B
factory measurements• Experimental results are consistent
Belle
SM
Babar
SM
SM lower than data by 2.7
PRD 79, 031102(R) (2009)PRL 103, 171801 (2009)
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 11
B(d,s)→+- Rare Decays• SM expected limits:
– Br(Bd→+-)<(1.00±0.14)x10-10 ~|Vtd|2
– Br(Bs→+-)<(3.86±0.57)x10-9 ~|Vts|2
• New physics could introduce tree-level contributions – can enhance the branching fraction by x100 over
the SM prediction
B(d,s)→+- Rare Decays• Utilize muons with ||<2.0,
pT>2.0 GeV/c• Boosted decision tree
– B-candidate decay length significance
– B-candidate pT
– B-candidate track isolation– Impact parameter significance– Vertex 2 probability
• Assume no contribution from Bd→+- (|Vtd/Vts|2~0.04)
• DØnote 5906W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 12
B(d,s)→+- Rare Decays• Utilize muons with ||<1.0,
pT>2.0 GeV/c• Muons form B-candidate
vertex• Neural-net variables
– B-candidate decay length and significance
– B-candidate track isolation– Opening angle between B-
candidate momentum and decay length
– pT(B) and pT(µLow)• CDFnote 9892
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 13
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 14
B(d,s)→+- Rare Decays
• At 95% CL in 3.7fb-1:
Br(Bd→+-)<7.6x10-9
Br(Bs→+-)<4.3x10-8
• Expected upper limit in 5fb-1 : Br(Bs→+)<5.3x10-8 (95% CL)
B(d,s)→+- Rare Decays• Enhancements over SM
greater than ~10x already excluded
• Combined Tevatron expected limits may reach 4x with 8fb-1
• Stay tuned!
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 15
NP?
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 16
Upsilon Polarization• Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromodynamics (NRQCD)
– QQ production is perturbative short-distance process– Hadronization into is long-distance process, which is
expanded in powers of heavy quark velocities• Past CDF measurements of J/ and (2s) polarization
do not agree with NRQCD• Reconstruct (1s)→+- decays
• In the rest frame, + makes an angle * with respect to the direction in the lab frame
• = 1 for fully longitudinal polarization• = +1 for fully transverse polarization
*2* cos1
cos
d
d 11
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 17
Upsilon Polarization
• Apply simulated trigger conditions and offline cuts
• Get templates reflecting how fully polarized events would appear in the detector
• Dimuon trigger: pT(1)>4GeV/c, pT(2) >3GeV/c, <0.6; Offline: require good dimuon vertex, with mass consistent with (1s)
• Generate MC samples with fully transverse and fully longitudinal polarizations
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 18
Upsilon Polarization• Determine
polarization parameter by matching a polarization-weighted combination of templates to the *(+) distributions in the data in each of eight pT () bins
• Apparent disagreement with NRQCD and DØ result
• Look forward to new DØ J/ and polarization results
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 19
CP Violation• Violation of the Charge-Parity Symmetry• Charge symmetry: matter antimatter• Parity symmetry: like a mirror symmetry but in 3D
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 20
CP Violation• Violation of the Charge-Parity Symmetry• Charge symmetry: matter antimatter• Parity symmetry: like a mirror symmetry but in 3D
• Large sources of CP violation would explain the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 21
• Bs0 mixing:
• If , an excess of Bs0
would “build up” CP violation• Search for a charge asymmetry in decays
versus decays
CP Violation in Bs0 Mixing
Antimatter Matter
)(Prob)(Prob 0000ssss BBBB
XDB ss 0
XDB ss 0
)(
)(2)(
)(0
0
0
0
tB
tBiM
tB
tBdtdi
s
s
s
s
5102: sSLASM
ftBftB
ftBftBAss
sssSL
)()()()(
00
00
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010
CP Asymmetry in Bs0 Semileptonic Decays
• Need to correct for detector asymmetries– Muon toroid polarity flip
• Use decay time information
• Tagging mixed versus unmixed decays helps
22
)()(0091.00017.0 0012.00023.0 syststatAs
SL
arXiv:0904.3907
CP Phase s in Bs0J/ Decays
• Get two mass eigenstates:
• SM predicts• New physics (e.g., 4th generation) could contribute a
large phase sNP
• Use Bs0J/ decays: golden mode
– yield both CP-even and CP-odd final states, which have different angular distributions
• Can separate the CP components via a time-dependent angular analysis of decay products
23
0 0
0 0
even
odd
sL s s
sH s s
B p B q B CP
B p B q B CP
31212 10)4.12.4()/arg( ΓMs
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010
122 MMM=Δm LHs sHLs ΓΓΓ=ΔΓ cos2 12
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010
CP Phase s in Bs0J/ Decays
24
DØnote 5928
CDFnote 9787
2.12
NPsss 2For large s
NP:
CP Phase s with ASL Constraint
25W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010
Assl=ΔΓs/Δms tan(s)
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 26
• B spectroscopy measurements provide sensitive tests of potential models, heavy quark effective theory (HQET), and lattice gauge theory
b Baryons
b-
b-
• Reconstruct 84893 b0c
+-+- events where c+pK-
+ in 2.4 fb-1
• Observe resonant structures: – b
0c(2595)+- c+-+-
– b0c(2625)+- c
+-+-
– b0c(2455)++-- c
+-+- – b
0c(2455)0+- c+-+-
• Measure branching fractions relative to b0c
+-+-
• Compare theoretical predictions to measured branching fractions to test heavy quark effective theory (HQET)
• Important for measurement of Br(b0c
+-)
Resonant Structure in b0c
+-+-
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 27
Resonant Structure in b0c
+-+-
• Sample collected by the impact-parameter trigger
• Look for resonances with respect to M(c
+)• Veto c* resonances for c*
search
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 28
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 29
Resonant Structure in b0c
+-+-
b- (ssb) Baryon Observation
• Use J/µ+µ- sample• Need to reconstruct three
decay vertices
• DØ uses BDT selection, unbinned likelihood mass fit and b
-J/ - decays for many cross-checks
• CDF uses a cut-based selection with B0J/K*0
and B0J/Ks0 decays for
cross-checks
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 30
b- (ssb) Baryon Observation
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 31
M=|MD0-MCDF|~6
4.2fb-1
M(b-)=6054.46.8(stat)0.9(syst) MeV/c2
PRD 80, 072003 (2009)
M(b-)=616510(stat)13(syst) MeV/c2
PRL 101, 232002 (2008)
S. Godfrey, DPF 2009 Proceedings
• CDF and DØ measurements of the b- mass agree
– DØ: M(b- )=577411(stat)15(syst) MeV/c2 (PRL 99,
052001 (2007))– CDF: M(b
- )=5790.92.6(stat)0.9(syst) MeV/c2
• DØ is performing new analysis with 5 x data– Half the new sample includes the new Layer 0 silicon
detector • CDF could at best double its dataset, but could also
include additional channels• Stay tuned!
b- (ssb) Baryon Observation
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 32
W. Taylor, APS/AAPT 2010 33
Conclusions• The Tevatron experiments are very active in B
physics and things are getting interesting! – CDF/DØ polarization– CDF/DØ b
- mass– CP violation in Bs
0J/– Bs
0→+-
• Tevatron is funded to run through 2011 10fb-1 – Need to improve analysis techniques too
• Can expect many improved results and maybe new discoveries in the next two years!