heavy metal forces of unification and fragmentation within a musical subculture

Upload: anonymous-lyxcvo

Post on 23-Feb-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    1/13

    VWB - Verlag fr Wissenschaft und Bildung, Brenreiter, Schott Music GmbH & Co. KG and Florian Noetzel

    GmbH Verlagare collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The World of Music.

    http://www.jstor.org

    VWB - Verlag fr Wissenschaft und Bildung

    Brenreiter

    Schott Music GmbH Co. KG

    Florian Noetzel GmbH Verlag

    Heavy Metal: Forces of Unification and Fragmentation within a Musical Subculture

    Author(s): Bettina RoccorSource: The World of Music, Vol. 42, No. 1, Gothic, Metal, Rap, and Rave - Youth Culture andIts Educational Dimensions (2000), pp. 83-94Published by: VWB - Verlag fr Wissenschaft und BildungStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41699315Accessed: 21-12-2015 13:57 UTC

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of contentin a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/http://www.jstor.org/publisher/vwbhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41699315http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41699315http://www.jstor.org/publisher/vwbhttp://www.jstor.org/
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    2/13

    theworld

    f

    music

    2(1)-

    2000:

    3-94

    Heavy

    Metal: Forces

    of

    Unification

    and

    Fragmentation

    within a Musical Subculture

    BettinaRoccor

    Abstract

    The

    istory

    fheavy

    metal

    eaches ack o he 960s.An

    ndependent

    ultural

    rac-

    tice

    eveloped

    n

    he 970s

    nd

    xperienced

    ts

    heighturing

    he

    980s,

    eclining

    n

    popularity

    n he

    ourse

    f

    he

    ollowing

    ecade.

    oday

    he

    eavy

    etalcene nGer-

    many

    sa

    multifaceted

    ultural

    andscape

    n

    which

    diversity

    f

    tyles

    hat

    eveloped

    over hreeecadesoexistside y ide,more r ess eacefully.n pite f heir any

    differences,

    ost

    ans

    eel

    hemselves

    obe members

    f

    ne

    amily

    ecause ll

    heavy

    metal

    tyles

    re

    based n he ame

    asic

    musical

    atterns,

    he alues

    upporting

    heir

    culture

    ave emained

    redominantly

    he

    ame

    nd hemusics

    negativemage

    as

    unified

    he

    ans

    n heir

    ndignation.

    1. Introduction

    Those

    whowant

    o

    approach

    he

    heavy

    metal cenewith view owards

    musical d-

    ucation, ithoutmmediatelyisqualifyinghemselvesythe probablyew)metal

    music

    aficionados

    resent

    n

    the

    classroom,

    hould

    be

    aware of a few

    essential

    things.

    irst

    f

    all,

    the

    heavy

    metal cene nvolves

    musically

    entered

    ub-culture

    without

    deological

    ommitmentsn the enseof a

    political

    uperstructure

    o which

    scenemembers

    eel

    hemselvesommitted

    Stratmann

    000,

    Roccor

    1996a,

    Roccor

    1996b,

    Mhlmann

    999).

    So

    you

    hould

    orget

    he umors

    ou

    haveheard rread

    up

    to now hat

    laim hat

    eavy

    metal nvolves

    decidedly ight-wing

    ultural

    ractice:

    heavy

    metal

    ^and

    Rechtsrock

    right-wing

    ock)

    retwo

    ompletely

    ifferentusical

    phenomena.

    he kernel

    f

    heavy

    metal s not

    special

    kind f

    deology

    ut ather

    themusic f

    heavy

    metal.

    verything

    lse is

    subject

    o the

    momentaryolitical,

    o-

    cal,

    social and ndividualonditions ithinwhich hiskind f music s made and

    consumed.

    hus

    here re few

    heavy

    metal ands

    hat how

    decided

    olitical

    tti-

    tude n their

    yricsmostly

    ather

    eft-wing,

    utwithin he

    blackmetal

    cene,

    ome

    fascistic).

    utthe

    uestion

    rises,

    o

    what xtent o

    such

    groups ctually

    nfluence

    theworld

    iews ftheir

    onsumers?

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    3/13

    84

    theworld

    f

    music

    2(1)-

    2000

    This s indeed

    ne of

    the

    most

    mportant

    esearch

    uestions

    egardingouth

    nd

    media:

    do consumers

    ccept

    withoutriticism hatevers

    presented

    o

    them,

    r

    are

    they

    n

    a

    position

    o distance hemselvesnd to

    develop

    differentiatedalue

    sys-

    tem?

    kin,

    he

    emale

    inger

    f

    he and kunk

    nasie,

    oubts he

    ersuadingoten-

    tial

    f

    ong yrics:

    I don't

    elievehatmusic

    an ransform

    olitics,

    ot ven

    he

    oliticalpinions

    f he

    people

    who isten

    o t.

    Music s more

    ommentary

    n ife.Music anbe effective

    when

    t s bound

    o n

    already

    xisting

    ovement/mental

    ttitude

    r n milieu

    s a

    cultural

    lement,

    ommenting,

    eflecting

    nd

    trengthening

    hat

    movement,

    tc.But

    then,hemovementsalreadyhere. usic idn'treatet.Music escribeshat as

    happened

    ith

    generation,

    hat as

    happened

    n he

    world

    n

    whicht

    ives,moves,

    andwhich

    thas

    oface

    Stratmann

    000:30).

    The

    question

    f

    whether

    usic

    r

    yrics

    ontribute

    t all to

    formingpinions

    ep-

    resents

    worthwhile

    eneral

    opic

    or

    music

    nstruction.n

    music

    history

    here

    re

    certainly

    nough

    xamples

    f

    political

    monopolization

    f music nd the

    resulting

    difficulties

    n

    dealing

    with

    works

    f rt

    nd heir

    reators;

    neneeds

    nly

    hink

    fRi-

    chard

    Wagner

    ndhis

    role

    during

    he

    period

    f theNational

    ocialists.

    We willre-

    turn

    ater

    othe

    roblem

    f

    politically

    otivated

    se ofmusic.

    2.

    The Metal

    Fans:

    Deviant

    Satanists?

    The

    message

    f

    heavy

    metal

    s-

    to

    emphasize

    his

    gain-

    not

    more ndnot

    essthan

    themusic

    alled

    heavy

    metal.

    And

    thismusic

    eflects

    hediverse

    worlds

    f ts

    fans,

    of

    people

    whofeel

    hemselves

    ttracted,

    or

    he

    most

    aried

    easons,

    othis oud

    kind

    of

    rockmusic

    nd

    ts

    ymbolism.

    f

    you

    sk

    a

    fan

    why

    he

    istens

    o

    heavy

    metal,

    he

    first

    nswer

    s almost

    lways,

    Because

    like he

    music."One

    can

    only

    make tate-

    ments

    n

    the easons

    or

    his

    nstinctive

    ympathy

    or

    heavy

    metal

    fone has nten-

    sively ealtwithhe ife toriesf he ans. rite ssumptionsuch s thatt s factors

    like

    "coming

    rom

    roken

    amilies"

    r

    "unemployment"

    hich ead

    consumerso

    grab

    or

    eavy

    metal

    CDs

    only

    cratch

    he urface

    fthe ituation.

    he

    fans retoo

    diverse

    n

    general,

    nd

    too different

    re

    thekinds

    f

    affinityhey

    eel

    owards he

    metal

    cene.

    But

    nthe

    lassroom,

    he

    entral ole

    fmusic

    hould

    lways

    e

    empha-

    sized

    n

    order

    o

    give

    tudents

    n

    adequate

    dea

    of

    heavy

    metal ulture.

    The

    heavy

    metal an

    efers

    o

    a

    musical

    radition

    hat as

    grown

    ver

    he ourse

    of

    decades,

    tradition

    rom

    whichmost

    f the

    ontemporary

    cene

    has created

    ts

    self-understanding.

    his

    fact

    sually

    emains

    oncealed

    o critics

    f he

    heavy

    metal

    scene:

    hey

    nterpret

    he

    phenomena

    f

    heavy

    metal

    xclusively

    n

    thebasis

    of the

    symbolismccompanyinghemusic,whetherntheformf mages, igns, exts r

    behavior.2

    result

    f

    his s

    the

    negative

    ublic

    mage

    f

    he

    heavy

    metal

    cene,

    n-

    changed

    o the

    present.

    o

    put

    t

    simply,

    his

    mage

    declares

    he

    average

    head-

    banger"

    o be

    a latent

    ight-wing

    adical,

    exist,

    iolent,

    lcoholic,

    ebilitated

    nd,

    even

    more,

    atanically

    social;

    ll must

    e

    wary

    f

    him

    cf.

    Seifert

    991,

    Der

    Spiegel

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    4/13

    Roccor.

    eavy

    Metal

    85

    2/1989:152f,

    ravo

    35/1990:52f).

    his

    image

    could

    only

    develop

    because

    heavy

    metal as

    been

    nterpreted

    ithout etailed

    nowledge

    f ts

    historical

    evelopment

    andcurrent

    tylisticiversity.

    urther,

    uch

    nterpretations

    ave

    onlypaid

    attention

    to

    the

    xpressions

    f ove for

    heavy

    metal hown

    y

    fans: n

    exteriorhat eems e-

    bellious,

    rovocative,

    ften

    liched,

    nd

    beyond

    ll other ashionablerends

    Roc-

    cor

    1992).

    3. The

    Kernel

    ofMetal: Music

    The

    roots

    f

    heavy

    metal ie n the

    1960s,

    when ands ikeBlack

    Sabbath,

    ed

    Zep-

    pelin

    nd

    Deep Purple

    made

    popular

    loud

    and

    guitar-heavy

    ind f rock alled

    "hard"

    r

    "heavy"

    ock,

    orming

    counterweight

    o the

    ften

    olitically

    otivated

    "hippie

    music"

    Herr

    1998,

    Khnemund

    997,

    Roccor

    1996a,

    1996b,

    Walser1993

    and

    Weinstein

    991).

    From

    hese

    commerciallyuite

    uccessful)

    eginnings,

    n n-

    dependent

    ultural

    ractice

    eveloped

    uring

    he1970s

    with ands uch s Thin iz-

    zy,

    Nazareth,

    ush

    and

    Rainbow,

    which

    eached heir

    eight

    f

    popularity

    n the

    1980s.

    Acts

    uch

    s Iron

    Maiden,

    Judas

    riest,Metallica,

    layer,

    axon and

    Ozzy

    Osbourne

    ormed,

    oth n the

    musical s

    well as behavioral

    evel,

    he

    tylistic

    oun-

    dation or his evelopmentalhase. nretrospect,his sregardeds thegolden ge

    of

    heavy

    metal

    nd s referred

    o

    as

    such

    by

    thosewho

    dentify

    hemselves ith his

    scene.

    This

    nchoring

    fthe ntire

    eavy

    metal

    cene

    n

    a common radition

    as

    is often

    accentuated

    o the

    present)

    houldnot

    obscure hefact hat he

    heavy

    metal

    and-

    scape,

    which

    resents

    tself

    s

    a

    uniform

    ubcultureo

    outsiders,

    as

    fallen

    nto

    ew,

    smaller

    erritories

    ince hemid-1980s.

    ifferencesetween hese erritoriesie on

    both

    hemusical

    s well as the

    tylistic

    nd

    deological

    evels. n additionothe

    yp-

    ical

    heavy

    metal

    fthe ate 1970s and

    early

    980s,

    tyles eveloped

    rom hemid-

    1980s

    uch

    s thrash etal

    fast,

    aw

    inging,.g.,Slayer); peed

    metal

    fast,

    echni-

    cally

    difficult,

    .g.,

    Metallica,

    xciter);

    eathmetal

    without

    heclassical

    refrain,

    "not eautiful"

    inging,.g.,

    Death,

    Obituary)

    ndblackmetal

    stylistically

    ariable,

    satanist

    ymbolism,

    .g.,

    King

    Diamond,

    Morbid

    Angel).

    ome

    styles

    ave

    gained

    numerically

    maller

    ut

    ery

    oyalbody

    f

    fans,

    uch

    s

    progressive

    etal

    musical-

    ly

    complex,

    riented

    oward lassic

    music,

    .g.,

    Blind

    Guardian,

    ream

    Theater),

    whitemetal

    Christian

    yrics,

    musically

    aried,

    .g., Stryper,

    ount

    Raven)

    and

    doommetal

    slow,

    dragging,.g.,

    St.

    Vitus,

    Candlemass).

    articularly

    n the

    U.S.,

    moderate

    etal

    cts

    uch s

    Ozzy

    Osbourne,

    otley

    riie nd

    Van Halen

    conquered

    the ecord

    harts

    uring

    he1980s.

    Inthe1990sheavymetal penedtself ptoneighboringtylesnd llowed le-

    ments

    rom

    runge,

    echno,

    olk,

    othic

    nd hardcoreo

    flow

    nto tsmusic.At the

    same

    ime,

    ew

    isteners

    merged

    hono

    onger orresponded

    o the

    ypical eavy

    fan;

    twas no

    onger

    contradictiono isten

    o

    first etallica

    a

    typical

    metal

    and)

    and henMarusha

    a

    popular

    echno-Djane).

    he market

    hanged,

    hich

    ed for x-

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    5/13

    86

    theworld

    f

    music

    2(1)-

    2000

    ample

    o he ormer

    epresentative

    f he

    cene,

    he

    ournal

    MetalHammer

    changing

    itsname

    o

    simply

    ammern

    order o draw

    young

    eaderswhowanted o

    isten o

    more

    han

    ust

    metal. n this

    ontext,

    heworldwideuccessof theband

    Metallica

    was

    highlymportant

    or he cene.Whethern

    positive

    r

    negative

    ense,

    his

    and

    still

    timulates

    iscussions

    ithin he

    ceneas it broke

    way

    from

    many

    ld tradi-

    tions

    nd hus

    ncited kind

    f

    dentity

    risis

    mongmany

    ans.

    Today

    he

    gothic

    metal

    cene s

    particularly

    opular, style

    hat ontainsntense

    guitars

    nd

    s tied

    o dramatics

    nd

    gloominess

    ypical

    f the

    gothic

    tyle. ypical

    gothic

    metal

    ands

    nclude

    Atrocity, y Dying

    Bride ndParadise

    ost.

    This cene

    formedntandem ith he econd enerationftheblackmetalmovementfast,n-

    clusion

    f sacred

    music

    lements,

    inging

    hat

    anges

    rom

    wheezing

    o

    screeching

    (e.g.,

    Dimmu

    orgir,

    mperor).

    so-called

    truemetal"

    evival lso

    took

    lace

    dur-

    ing

    he1990s

    when

    many

    ands

    harked

    ack

    o classical

    heavy

    metal nd

    used

    ypi-

    cal

    stylistic

    eans

    as

    the

    very

    uccessful

    roup

    Hammerfall)

    uch

    s

    high

    ocaliz-

    ing,

    guitar

    olos,

    straight

    hythms,

    sword&

    sorcery"

    isual effects

    nd

    fantasy

    lyrics.

    Whilenumerous

    ult ands

    f he 980s

    uch

    s

    Destruction,

    gent

    teel

    nd

    Metal

    Church

    eunited

    o tie nto

    heir

    arlier

    uccess,

    new

    bands lso

    tried o

    gain

    fresh

    uyers

    or

    heir

    music

    nder

    he

    heading

    newmetal."

    Today

    he

    metal

    cene s

    highly

    iverse

    n musical

    erms,

    ncluding

    othmelo-

    dramaticallads s wellas two-minute-longrind oreattacks.n addition othe

    purely

    musical

    ifferences

    hat

    mostly

    emain

    idden

    othe

    utsider,

    e also find

    i-

    verse

    egional

    eculiarities.

    urther,

    istinctions

    mong

    henumerous

    an

    roups

    e-

    velop

    out

    of

    different

    ife

    ituations

    nd even

    between

    riends.

    ere

    do not

    only

    mean

    he

    ategories

    hat

    igeonhole

    ertain

    ands

    otheir

    espective

    ountriesf

    or-

    igin

    for

    U.S.

    metal

    elongs

    s

    little

    o the

    U.S. alone

    s the uccess

    fthe o-called

    "

    Neue

    Deutsche

    Hrte

    (lit.,

    new

    German

    ard)

    group

    ammstein

    as been imited

    to

    Germany

    Jeske

    996/1997/1999,

    ader

    & Jeske

    995,

    1997

    &

    1998

    andMhl-

    mann

    999).

    Also

    tobe

    considered

    re ssues

    f nstrumentalization

    f

    hemusic

    nd

    the

    ymbolism

    hat

    ccompanies

    his

    rocess.

    4.

    The

    Fragmentation

    f

    Metal

    F ans

    According

    o the

    ocio-cultural

    ontext,

    eclaring

    neself

    fan

    f

    heavy

    metal

    rof

    a

    particular

    and

    rom

    his

    pectrum

    antake

    n different

    eanings.

    he

    best

    xam-

    ple

    of

    this

    s

    theband

    Slayer,

    which

    s

    controversial

    ithin he

    cene

    because f

    ts

    lyrics

    nd

    the

    tatements

    hey

    ave

    made

    n

    nterviews

    ut lso

    highly opular

    e-

    cause

    of

    ts

    music.

    The

    band's

    songs

    hold

    completely

    ifferent

    ignificance

    or

    group fright-wingaleteenage adicals romhe ormerastGermanyhan or

    clique

    of ntellectual

    orth

    orean

    tudents

    r

    a Brazilian

    metal

    an

    rom he

    white

    middle

    lass.

    t

    is the

    ontext

    hich

    s

    decisive,

    ot

    necessarily

    he

    original

    nten-

    tions

    f

    theband

    tself.

    hus

    hefan

    lub

    ogo

    of

    the

    group

    layer, grinning

    kull

    wearing

    fireman's

    elmet,

    ecorates

    -shirts,

    atches

    nd

    pins

    with

    he words

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    6/13

    Roccor.

    eavy

    Metal

    87

    above

    t,

    Slatanic

    Wehrmacht

    ("Slatanic"

    German rmed

    orces).

    ight-wing

    ans

    interpret

    his

    s a

    declaration

    f

    sympathy

    or

    he

    Nazi

    period,

    while

    hose rom he

    left-wing,

    ntellectual

    pectrum

    ake hismotive o be

    a

    skillful

    rovocation

    f the

    bourgeois

    ociety

    hat

    uppresses

    tsmemoriesf heNazis. Nazi skinheadsisten

    o

    Slayer

    o stimulate

    hem

    o attack

    oreigners,

    hile

    North orean tudents iscuss

    philosophical

    nd

    political

    opics

    othe ounds f he and.Brazilian

    ans

    egard

    he

    group,

    ith

    ts

    wo

    South

    American

    members,

    s a

    spiritual

    elative

    o the alterna-

    tive"national

    eroes

    f

    Sepultura,

    extremely

    uccessful

    hrashmetal

    band

    from

    Rio.

    Slayertself asmade uperficial,fnot osay ompletelyaive, tatementsn n-

    terviews

    n

    political

    opics,

    nd

    they

    now

    bout s much

    boutNational

    ocialism

    as could

    be written

    n

    a

    single

    heet f

    paper.

    ut his

    idnot

    prevent

    hebandfrom

    writing

    song

    bout he

    oncentration

    amp

    doctor osef

    Mengele.

    Angel

    fDeath"

    goes

    down

    he

    ist fhis

    unimaginable

    ctsof

    cruelty

    n a

    choppy

    ascade

    of

    words,

    without

    udging

    r

    commenting

    n them.As

    a

    prank,

    he

    youth

    adio

    tation

    f the

    Bavarian

    roadcastingompany

    ncehad

    this ext

    ead n the ir

    s

    though

    t

    were

    a

    poem

    by

    the

    well-known

    oet

    Gottfried

    enn.Presented

    n

    this

    way,

    t created

    goose

    pimples

    mong

    non-metal

    ans

    s

    well,

    ust

    as when

    layer lays

    he

    ong

    n

    live

    concerts.

    The example fSlayer howsthatheavymetal lso representsform fart,

    which

    s

    thus

    nterpretable;

    ach fan

    nterprets

    he

    tatements,

    mages

    nd

    yrics

    f

    the

    band

    differently.

    ut

    the

    arge

    majority

    s

    not t

    all interested

    n whatkind

    f

    statement

    s

    being

    made,

    for

    xample,

    n the

    ong

    Angel

    f Death."

    They

    ikethe

    song,

    he

    music,

    he

    vocal

    style;

    hey

    ould

    are ess

    about he ontents

    fthe

    yrics.

    This s

    one

    reason

    why

    many

    ans

    re

    rritated

    henmetal

    ournalists

    sk

    uncomfort-

    able

    questions

    bout

    ontroversial

    usicians

    ikePeter

    teele

    or

    Slayer

    nd

    the n-

    tentions

    ftheir

    ong yrics.

    hey

    ind

    hemusic

    ood,

    nd

    they

    on't

    want oknow

    any

    more.

    his

    s

    what s also

    meant

    y

    he tatement

    hat

    hemetal cene an be

    de-

    scribed

    s

    nonpolitical:

    he

    meanings

    f

    yrics

    nd

    mages

    s of

    esser

    mportance

    compared

    o a

    song's

    musical

    ualities.

    n

    right-wing

    ock,

    he ituations

    the

    ppo-

    site: he

    yrics

    re n

    the

    oreground

    nd

    he

    ery

    imple, unk-like

    usic orms

    nly

    an

    acoustic

    ackground

    othe

    houted azi

    slogans.

    In

    view

    f he

    many

    arieties

    f

    heavy

    metal

    ypes,

    s well s the ocial

    differenc-

    es

    among

    ts

    fans,

    whether

    elated

    o

    class,

    gender, ge

    or

    ethnicity,

    he

    question

    emerges

    s

    to

    why

    he

    heavy

    metal

    ulture

    till

    perceives

    tself s a

    single

    ulture.

    The

    scene

    ontinuouslyresents

    tself o the

    utsideworldwith

    nbroken

    ride

    s a

    unified

    ntity,

    lthough

    hose

    iewing

    t

    from he

    utside an

    see

    little

    ommonality

    between,

    ay,

    the

    gothic

    metal

    cene and

    progressive

    ans,

    r

    between raditional

    "metals"ndblackmetal ans.Both n theirlothings wellas in their ehavior nd

    musical

    ractices,

    ans

    display

    lear

    differences

    mong

    hemselves

    nd make lear

    attempts

    o set

    up

    borders

    ith

    eighboring

    ubstyles

    ndtheir lienteles.

    Each

    type

    f

    heavy

    metal

    as

    developed

    tsown

    ystem

    f

    signs

    made

    of

    music,

    symbolism,

    lothing

    nd behavior.

    n

    theblackmetal

    cene,

    or

    nstance,

    he

    black,

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    7/13

    88

    the

    world

    f

    music

    2(1)-

    2000

    studded

    eather

    lothing

    ntroduced

    n the

    arly

    1980s

    by groups

    ikeJudas

    riest,

    Mercyful

    ate

    or Motrhead

    as revived

    uring

    heradicalization

    f black

    metal;

    outfits

    ere

    modified

    y

    adding

    ccessories rom

    hematically

    elated

    ubcultures.

    The

    black

    metal

    utfit

    ncludes

    hreateningly

    ong, piked

    racelets,

    lack

    ederhose,

    vampire-like

    apes,

    heavy

    lack

    ied-up

    oots

    ndbizarre

    lack-and-white

    akeup.

    Martial

    rts

    weapons

    ike

    battle-axes,

    aces

    nd

    outsized words

    omplete

    he m-

    age

    of

    the

    dangerous

    night

    f

    darkness.

    he

    masquerade

    f "merciless"

    epresents

    an

    optical

    ounterpart

    o the

    music.

    he atter

    hould

    e more

    adical

    nd

    relentless

    than

    nything

    hat

    ad

    previously

    elighted

    eavy

    metal

    ans.All

    elements,

    hether

    in heyrics,he elf-presentationf hemusiciansr he tage hows, it nto he ign

    system

    f

    "black

    metal."

    his

    system

    s

    also

    supported

    y

    the

    music,

    with

    ts

    high-

    speed

    double

    ass,

    torms

    friffs

    nd

    ts

    ometimes

    verboard

    ysterics,

    ometimes

    choppy

    inging,

    hich

    s

    accompanied

    y

    dramatic

    horuses

    nd chords

    n the

    or-

    gan.

    The

    fans

    who

    ove

    this

    music

    rient

    hemselves

    ptically

    o the

    musicians,

    ut

    usually

    hoose

    or

    hemselves

    more

    moderate

    treet

    ersion

    f

    he ebellious

    orror

    outfits.

    In

    case

    of

    doubt,

    earing

    ong

    hair

    nd

    fan

    hirt,

    he

    niform

    f

    hemetal

    an,

    s

    enough

    or

    ll

    outsiders

    o

    recognize

    person

    s

    belonging

    o themetal

    cene.

    De-

    tails

    ell

    nsiders

    he

    person's

    references

    or

    particular

    eavy

    tyle,

    uch

    s

    the

    shirtmotivendtheparticularccessorieshat reworn. orexample crossworn

    upside-down

    ith

    strongly

    lienating

    and

    ogo

    is

    an

    indication

    or

    he

    person's

    passion

    or

    lack

    metal.

    Otherwise

    he ndividual

    eed

    for

    xpression

    ecides

    how

    many

    dditional

    lothing

    lements

    re

    taken

    ver

    from

    he

    musicians.

    fan

    ould

    decide

    o

    wear

    martial

    rts-related

    ilver

    ewelry

    the

    upside-down

    ross

    or

    penta-

    gram,

    tuds

    r

    chains)

    r

    makeup-

    orelse

    can make

    do without

    ny

    utside

    igns

    f

    belonging

    o

    the

    cene

    and

    simply

    uy

    black

    metal

    CDs

    and

    go

    to concerts

    f the

    bands.

    In

    contrast

    o

    the adical

    lack

    metal

    cene

    which

    s

    at

    themoment

    articularly

    popularmong ounger

    ans

    n

    Germany),

    he

    raditionalists'

    cene

    has

    taken

    p

    the

    fight

    or

    he

    good

    old"truemetal." his

    scene,

    whichs also

    quite

    ctivenow,

    pro-

    claims

    ts

    onvictions

    articularly

    n

    fanzines.

    or

    he

    raditionalists,

    eath

    ndblack

    metal

    o not

    ven

    belong

    o

    heavy

    metal.

    heir

    rguments

    gainst

    eath

    nd

    black

    metal

    xtend

    rom

    he

    uality

    f

    themusic

    too

    dilettantish)

    o

    the ust

    or

    ommer-

    cial

    success

    t

    any

    ost,

    othe

    yrics,

    hich

    re aid

    tocross

    ll

    boundaries

    f aste

    n

    order

    o ncrease

    ales.

    This

    traditionalist

    roup

    wears

    lothing

    xactly

    ike

    that

    f

    the

    ans

    fthe

    1980s:

    ight-fitting

    eans,

    neakers,

    and

    hirts

    nd

    a kind

    f

    monk's

    habit,

    n

    which

    atches

    with he

    names

    f

    particular

    ands

    have

    been

    ewn.

    his

    out-

    fit

    roclaims,

    I

    am

    a metal

    Urgestein

    lit.,

    riginal

    ock,

    r

    an

    original,

    oyal

    fan)

    and 'mnot shamedf t."This truemetal" actioneesto t hathe ands

    rom

    he

    1970s

    and

    80s

    are

    not

    forgotten;

    hey

    lay

    he

    role

    of

    Heimatpfleger

    caretakers

    f

    traditional

    ustoms,

    word

    sually

    sed

    n

    connection

    ith

    olk

    ulture),

    ho

    dig

    up

    and

    revive

    he

    old

    song

    epertoire."

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    8/13

    Roccor.

    eavy

    Metal

    89

    Trench

    warfare

    ithinhe

    heavy

    metal cene s one

    factorhat asmarkedtsde-

    velopment,

    hether

    etween black"

    nd

    "white"

    ommunities,

    etween oft ock

    and

    deathmetal

    ans,

    r between

    olitically

    ctive

    nd

    disinterestedans. urther-

    more,

    ince

    he ate

    1980s

    metal-typical

    an ulture as

    experienced diluting ro-

    cess

    due

    to

    the

    teadily

    rowing roup

    f isteners ho isten

    o

    not

    nly eavy

    metal

    but lso

    formerly

    enemy

    musics"

    uch s

    hiphop,

    echno,

    ndependent

    ndrelated

    substyles.

    husmass

    heavy

    metalmusical vents

    eld t the ndofthe 0th

    entury

    such

    s the

    pen

    irconcert Rock

    am

    Ring"presented

    colorfulmixture

    f musi-

    cians

    of

    completely

    ifferent usical

    ypes.

    en

    years go,

    t wouldhave beenun-

    thinkableor uchgroupsoappear ogethern onestage.n reactionothis,ndivid-

    ual

    scenes

    re

    establishing

    vents

    hat

    resent

    xclusively

    heir

    wnbands

    e.g.,

    he

    Wacken

    Open

    Air

    or the

    Dynamo

    Open

    Air

    n Eindhoven

    ormetal

    ans;

    heZillo-

    Festival

    rGothicAVave-Treffen

    n

    Leipzig

    for heblack

    cene).

    What s

    put

    n

    dis-

    play

    t

    uch vents

    s the

    pure

    octrine,"

    hether

    n a

    musical,

    ptical

    rbehavioral

    level.

    This

    s for

    hemetal

    an

    chaoticmud

    fight,

    or hewaver

    he killful

    resen-

    tation

    f he

    perfectly

    tyled

    elf.

    till,

    hemetal cene

    fightsgainst

    nconsistencies

    resulting

    rom

    he imitlessness

    f the

    marketnd

    theno

    longer

    xistent

    eparation

    between

    mainstream

    nd

    underground

    at

    east n the

    art

    f hemusic

    ndustry).

    5.

    Forces

    of

    Unification

    As

    mentioned

    arlier,

    eavy

    metal

    ontinues

    o

    represent

    tself

    o the utside

    world

    as a closed

    cultural

    ystem,

    system

    n which

    he ame aws

    apply

    s

    twenty ears

    ago.

    The

    foundation

    f this

    proudly

    roclaimed

    elf-understanding

    eemsto be

    a

    continuing

    onsensus

    n whatmakes

    heavy

    metal

    ndependent

    rom

    ther

    tyles.

    y

    means

    fdiverse

    trategies,

    he

    eadership

    f

    magazines

    nd

    fanzines,

    or

    xample,

    swear

    o a

    common

    enominator

    hat s

    supposed

    omaintainhe

    pirit

    f

    heavy

    met-

    al over ndaboveall stylisticoundaries.nmy pinion

    here re

    n

    particular

    hree

    such

    factorshat

    llegedly

    nsure

    hat

    eavy

    metal

    emains a beast hat

    efuses o

    die:"4

    Firm

    ies

    o a common

    musical

    radition.

    Recognition

    ffundamental

    eavy

    metal

    alues.

    Negative

    valuation

    y

    outsiders.

    As

    soon

    s

    a new

    tyle

    or

    the eaction

    o

    t)

    coincides

    t east

    partially

    ith hese

    three

    actors,

    t

    an

    be

    integrated

    nto

    he

    heavy

    metal

    ultures a whole.

    Before his

    happens,

    certain

    hase

    f

    uncertaintyay

    lso

    emerge,

    uring

    hich

    much iscus-

    sion

    nd

    polemicizing

    ake

    lace.

    Generational

    onflicts

    lay

    n essential ole

    nthis

    integrationrocess. heolder ans sually eact irstna way hat ejectshatwhich

    is

    produced

    ndfavored

    y

    he

    younger

    eneration

    ecause ften

    henew

    tyle ues-

    tions

    he

    xisting

    radition

    nd

    produces

    ew

    ways

    f

    measuring

    usical,

    yrical

    nd

    behavioral

    rovocation.

    good example

    fthis

    s the

    group

    eathmetal,

    hich n-

    stigated

    oth

    ndignation

    s well

    as

    enthusiasm.

    heirmusic ontained

    heezing

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    9/13

    90

    theworld

    f

    music

    2(1)

    -2000

    voices nstead

    f

    high,

    lear

    vocalization,

    storm friffsnstead f

    guitar

    olos,

    nd

    morbid

    yrics

    nstead f

    hymns

    othe

    peacefulness

    f

    he

    ock n roll

    ifestyle.

    n

    the

    end,

    hough,

    he

    many

    ritics romhe

    heavy

    metal cenehad o

    grudgingly

    cknowl-

    edge

    that

    his

    generation

    f metal ans nd musicians

    re

    doing

    nothing

    ore han

    what

    hey

    hemselves

    ad donefive r

    ten

    years

    arlier. he

    younger eneration

    s

    shocking

    he "old

    guys"

    nd

    showing

    hem hat he extremes

    ave not

    yet

    been

    reached

    y

    ny

    tretch

    fthe

    magination.

    ven

    funder

    rotest,

    eathmetal

    as fi-

    nally

    ccepted,

    nd

    here

    was

    peace

    until he

    next ew

    tyle merged.

    he new

    tyle

    that aused

    stir-

    meaning

    hat t

    delighted

    ome

    ndlessly

    nd madeothers hake

    their eadswith orror-was the adical tyle fblackmetal.n thisway, he ultural

    spectrum

    f

    heavy

    metal

    has been

    continually

    roadened

    new

    without

    aving

    o

    give

    up

    that

    which

    lready

    xisted.

    After

    ll,

    the

    younger,

    ebellious ands

    lso em-

    phasize

    epeatedly

    he nfluence

    nd

    nspiration

    hey

    avereceived

    rom heir

    rede-

    cessors.)

    he

    ndependence

    f

    he ubscenes

    hus

    orms

    nly superficial

    ontrast

    o

    the

    propagated

    nity

    f

    the ulture

    s a

    whole.The

    musical

    oundation,

    hat

    s,

    the

    collective

    eroes

    nd

    themusical

    heritage,

    njoys

    uninterrupted

    espect

    oth rom

    the

    younger

    s well

    as the lder

    an

    generations,

    ndthis

    reates

    iesbetween

    hem.

    Today

    he

    cene

    hasthe

    major

    roblem

    hat

    othing

    ew r

    provocative

    as

    appeared

    on

    thehorizon

    or

    uite

    while.Musicians

    re

    quoting

    hemselves

    nd

    stewing

    n

    theirwnuices,which ausesmany ans opredicthe ndofheavymetal.

    In

    spite

    fall

    their

    ifferences,

    hat

    ontributes

    onsiderably

    o the we

    feeling"

    of

    the cene

    s the

    negative erception

    mong

    utsiders

    fthe

    heavy

    metal

    ulture.

    The

    heavy

    metal

    cene

    s a

    conglomerate

    f

    numerous

    lichs,

    ot

    nly

    or

    he

    gno-

    rant mateur

    ut lso

    for

    many rofessionals

    ho

    give

    scholarly, hilosophical

    r

    journalistic

    ommentary

    n

    heavy

    metal.

    he

    long-haired

    igure

    earing

    monk's

    habit

    as become

    symbol

    or he

    dull,

    thically

    isoriented

    attle-like

    asses

    who

    can

    only

    be shaken

    ut

    of their

    ethargy

    y

    means

    of

    brainless,

    mercilessly

    oud,

    stamping

    usic

    without

    ny

    kind

    f

    meaningful

    ontents.

    imply

    he act

    hat ome-

    one"belongs"

    o a certain

    musical

    genre

    ecomes

    vidence

    or

    whole

    tring

    f

    characteristics

    hat re

    ttached

    othat

    eclared an. he reactionothis

    negative

    a-

    beling

    s on

    the ne hand

    collective,

    more-or-less

    ustified

    ndignation,

    s

    well as

    the

    mergence

    f

    "we

    feeling"-

    hat

    s,

    he

    erception

    f we

    who re

    unjustifiably

    attacked."

    his

    martyr

    onsciousness"

    as

    been

    driven o new

    heights y

    he

    group

    Die

    Bhsen

    Onkelz.

    his

    group

    trained

    ts

    mage

    s an

    unjustifiably

    ttacked

    ictim

    of

    themedia

    o

    the imit.

    ue

    to the

    group's

    never

    ontested

    ast

    s

    skinheads,

    he

    media

    ccused

    hem

    f

    having

    ome

    responsibility

    or

    he eries

    f

    anti-foreigner

    t-

    tacks

    made

    n

    Germany

    uring

    he

    arly

    990s.

    ome of

    the rsonists

    ho

    etfire

    o

    houses

    where

    sylum-seekers

    ived

    had

    wornOnkelz

    hirts,

    nd

    n the

    arly

    980s

    thebandhada song n tsrepertoireith he itle Trken aus" TurksGo Home)

    which

    was

    however

    ever

    ublished.

    n the

    asis

    of hese

    acts,

    he

    ress

    oncluded

    that

    ie Bhsen

    Onkelz

    was an

    deological

    redecessor

    f

    growing

    ight-wing

    adi-

    calism.

    ven

    hough

    heband

    epeatedly

    istanced

    tself rom

    he

    ight-wing

    adical

    scene,

    nd

    even

    organized

    Rock

    Against

    he

    Right-wing"

    estivals,

    any

    media

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    10/13

    Roccor.

    eavy

    Metal

    91

    representatives

    nsisted

    n this view.

    Indignation

    ver

    the

    unjustified

    reatment

    brought

    ogether

    he

    and nd

    ts

    ans,

    which s

    why

    Onkelz ans ancount n

    at

    east

    one

    song

    on each

    new

    recording

    ith he heme We are the

    capegoats

    f the

    na-

    tion."

    As this

    xample

    hows,

    indingogether

    ans

    eyond tylistic

    orderss the om-

    mon

    knowledge

    hat

    many

    f

    the

    heavy

    metal

    lichs re

    basedon a too

    iteral

    er-

    ception

    f he

    cene

    nd hat hismusic

    ctually ays

    much

    more

    hat s

    socially

    ele-

    vant han

    s

    commonly

    ssumed.

    isagreements

    ver ndividual

    trategies

    n

    how o

    deal with

    ttacks

    rom

    he utside

    o however

    ave

    separating

    ffect.

    While ome

    make ffortsoward larificationnddialogue, thers rawback nto till tronger

    forms

    f

    provocation.

    he

    atter

    ick

    up

    the

    gauntlet

    hrownown

    by

    ritics

    ith e-

    ligious

    r

    youth-protection

    otivations

    nd

    answer

    hesewith till

    rasser lichs

    that

    elp

    hemselves

    o all

    the

    ignals

    hat erve

    rt. ome

    even

    resort

    o

    violence,

    s

    in he adical

    lack

    metal

    cene

    n

    Norway,

    here

    anatics

    ent o far

    s to setfire

    o

    churches

    nd o

    carry

    utbrutal

    ttacks

    n

    Christian

    ands

    Roccor

    1992,

    Billerbeck

    & Nordhausen

    994

    andKrull

    1993).

    Heavy

    metal

    s

    not,

    s

    so often

    sserted,

    imply

    oud,

    primitive

    ockbut ather

    form

    fmusic

    hat

    tands

    or

    particular

    ttitude

    owards

    ife,

    or alues

    hat he

    ans

    miss

    n their

    ormal

    veryday

    orld nd

    which

    hey

    not

    rarely

    ind n

    themetal

    scene. repeat ere nly hemostmportantatchwordshat rerepeatedlysedby

    fans

    nd

    musicians:

    uthenticity,

    onesty,

    olidarity,

    ohesion,

    ommunity

    eeling,

    the

    lain

    ruth

    ithout

    dornment,

    irectness,

    oyalty,

    ithout

    ompromise,

    onesty,

    provocation,

    eing

    different.

    bsolute

    ounter-values

    or

    he scene

    are:

    salability,

    playing

    p

    to

    norms,

    ommercialization,

    gomania,

    osing,

    ensorship.

    ne of

    the

    central

    oncepts

    f themetal

    cene

    s

    that f

    freedom: reedom

    o

    say

    what

    one

    wants,

    o

    think

    hat ne

    wants,

    o ook

    s one

    wants,

    ithout

    egard

    f

    reigning

    or-

    als.

    For

    this

    eason,

    hemusicians

    who

    enjoy

    he

    highest

    egree

    f admirationre

    those

    who

    practice

    heavy

    metal

    tyle

    f

    ifewith

    he east

    degree

    f

    compromise.

    These

    are musicians

    who

    have

    themselves

    attooed

    ver their ntire

    odies,

    who

    grow

    heir

    air own

    otheir

    ips,

    who

    prefer

    o

    wear he ame lothes

    ay

    n nd

    day

    out

    and

    who remain

    nconditionally

    rue

    o the

    deepermeaning

    f

    heavy

    metal n

    their

    music

    nd

    yrics,

    egardless

    f newer

    rends r sales

    figures.

    o

    do

    your

    wn

    thing

    nd

    o et

    ll kinds f

    riticism

    lide ff

    ou:

    his

    epresents

    he dealof hemet-

    al scene-

    an

    deal,

    t hould

    e

    noted,

    hat

    tands

    iametrically

    pposed

    othe ctual

    lives

    ofmost

    ans.

    6.

    Conclusion

    For

    those

    who

    want o

    approach

    he

    heavy

    metal

    cene,

    wouldrecommend

    irst

    bearing

    he

    ollowing

    nmind

    speaking

    rom

    many

    ears

    f

    experience):

    he

    argest

    barrier

    s the

    xisting

    lich n

    one's own

    head.One must

    earn o

    perceive

    he

    erson

    behind

    he

    bloodthirstyooking

    -shirt

    nd

    to

    comprehend

    is or her

    ppearance

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    11/13

    92

    theworld

    f

    music

    2(1)-

    2000

    simply

    s an

    expression

    f

    being

    fan,

    withoutash

    nterpretations

    bout

    he

    possi-

    ble

    conceptual

    ontent.

    mportant

    s that hefan s

    always

    he

    xpert. econdly,

    he

    researchers

    hould t east

    ttempt

    o

    get

    sed

    o

    the

    music,

    or f

    hey

    ave

    noknowl-

    edge

    ofthe

    music,

    hey

    willbe able to find ut ittle bout ts

    fans.

    hird,

    nvestiga-

    tors

    hould bstain

    rom ash

    ategorizations,

    or

    he

    fine ifferencesre

    precisely

    what

    s

    mportant

    othe

    metal an.

    A finalword f

    dvice:

    nevermake hemistake f

    describingeavy

    metal s "noise"-

    orBon Jovi

    s a

    heavy

    metal

    roup.

    hat

    would

    mean

    he ertain

    ndof

    ny

    kind fconversation.

    Notes

    1

    The

    ssertion

    as

    eenmade

    hat

    eavy

    etal as

    he

    endency

    owards

    ight-wing

    adicalism,

    for

    xample

    nLenz 989

    nd

    er

    piegel

    4/1998:304;

    riticism

    f his iew

    an efound

    n

    Helsper

    992,

    tock

    Mhlberg

    990

    ndMatthesius

    995.

    his oes ot

    meanhat

    herere

    no

    heavy

    etal ans

    ith radical

    ight-wing

    rientation.

    hese

    o

    exist,

    ust

    s the

    sually

    overlooked

    onpolitical

    nd eft-

    ing-oriented

    kinhead

    cenes.

    ee Farin

    Seidel-Pielen

    1994

    nd

    unk-Hennigs

    995.

    2

    This

    olds

    rue

    articularly

    n

    he

    se f

    atanicr

    ccult

    ymbols

    n

    heavy

    etal.

    ee heit-

    eraturen pponentsfChristianock,uchs Banol 987, umer984ndGlogauer

    992.

    3

    On

    he

    tyles

    f

    heavy

    etal,

    eeRoccor

    996a

    nd 996b.

    4

    A formulation

    fDeena

    Weinstein

    9

    1

    5

    On he

    etailed

    istory

    fDie

    Bhsen

    nkelz,

    eeHartsch

    997.

    References

    Banol,

    ernando

    alazar

    1987

    Die

    okkulte

    eite

    esRock.

    nchen:

    irthammer.

    Bumer,

    lrich

    1984

    Wir ollen

    ur eine

    eele.

    ardrock:

    aten,

    akten

    Hintergrnde.

    ielefeld:

    hris-

    tliche

    iteraturverbreitung.

    Billerbeck,

    iane

    Frank

    ordhausen

    1994

    Der

    Mordfall

    andro

    .Berlin:

    H.

    Links.

    Farin,

    laus

    Eberhard

    eidel-Pielen

    1994

    Skinheads.

    nchen:

    .

    H. Beck.

    Funk-Hennings,

    rika

    1995

    "Skinheadmusik,

    i-Musik,

    azi-Rock."

    ahrbuch

    r

    Volksliedforschung

    0: 84-

    101.

    Glogauer,

    erner

    1 92

    "Videoclips

    om

    eufel,

    ergewaltigen

    ndMorden

    Sic .

    Verharmlosende

    tudie

    er

    Landesmedienanstalten."

    (ugend)-M(edien)-S(chutz)-Report

    :

    44-48.

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    12/13

    Roccor.

    eavy

    Metal

    93

    Hartsch,

    dmund

    1997

    Danke

    r

    ichtsBhse

    nkelz.

    rankfurtmMain: O

    Management.

    Helsper,

    erner

    1992

    Okkultismus-

    ieneue

    ugendreligion?

    ie

    Symbolik

    esTodes

    nd

    esBsenn er

    Jugendkultur.pladen:

    eske nd udrich.

    Herr,

    atthias

    1989-98

    atthias

    err'

    Heavy

    Metal exikon

    vols. -6.Berlin:

    elbstverlag

    1989/1990/

    1991/1994/1996/1998].

    Jeske,

    tger

    t l.

    1996-99.S.Metal,ols. -3. erlin:.P.Verlageske/MaderbR1996/1997/1999].

    Khnemund,

    tz

    t l.

    1997

    Rock

    ard

    nzyklopdie.

    00 er

    nteressantestenockbands

    usden

    etzten

    reiig

    Jahren.

    ortmund:

    ock

    ard.

    Krull,

    lex

    1

    93

    "Von atanisten

    nd ierschtzern."

    ock ard

    0:6-8.

    Lenz,

    eter

    1989

    "It sn't ock'n

    oll,

    hat's

    hy

    e ike

    t. aschistischend

    atanistischeendenzen

    des

    Heavy

    Metal

    mKontext

    erGeschichte

    erRockmusik."

    nRock

    yrik.

    xem-

    plarische

    nalysen

    nglischsprachiger

    ong-Texte

    Erhardahl/Karsten

    hrkorb,

    eds. ssen: ieBlaue ule, 88-212.

    Mader,

    atthias,

    tger

    eske,

    t l.

    1995

    NWoBHM.

    he

    loryays.

    erlin:.P.

    Verlag

    eske/MaderbR.

    1997

    New

    Wave

    f

    ritish

    eavy

    etal

    vol. .

    Berlin:.P.

    Verlag

    eske/MaderbR.

    1998

    Heavy

    etal ade

    n

    Germany.

    erlin:.P.

    Verlag

    eske/Mader

    bR.

    Matthesius,

    eate

    1 95

    "DieBhsen

    nkelz

    mehrls ine

    echtekinheadmusikband."

    ugendwohl

    ,

    1 1

    5.

    Mhlmann,

    diger

    1999

    Letzte

    usfahrt:

    ermania.in

    hnomenamenseue eutscherte. erlin:

    .P.

    Verlag

    eske/Mader

    bR.

    Roccor,ettina

    1992

    Heavy

    etal.

    ine

    antypologie

    nhand

    on

    leidung.

    egensburg:

    niversitte-

    gensburg

    unpublished

    aster's

    hesis).

    1994

    "Heavy

    etal.

    ewaltdarstellung

    der

    ewaltverherrlichung?"

    n

    GewaltnderKul-

    tur,

    olf

    W.

    Brednich,

    alter

    artinger,

    ds.Passau: assauertudienurVolk-

    skunde,

    45-58.

    1996a

    Heavy

    etal-

    unst,ommerz,

    etzerei.

    erlin:.P.

    Verlag

    eske/MaderbR.

    1996b

    Heavy

    etal-

    ie

    Bands,

    ie

    ans,

    ie

    Gegner.

    nchen:.H.Beck.

    1997

    "Crossover.tilistische

    renzberschreitungen

    nden 0er nd 0er ahren."nTech-

    no. wischenokalkolorit

    ndUniversalstruktur.ermann

    rtmaier,

    onald

    itzler,

    Franz

    uber,

    ichaela

    fadenhauer,

    ds.Mnchen:okumentationum

    Workshop

    imHaus er ugendarbeitnMnchenm 4.und 5.Januar997,9-62.

    Roccor,

    ettinaMartin

    telzer

    1995

    "Heavy

    etal-Clubs.nMnner-Kulturened.

    Burglengenfeld:egleitheft

    ur on-

    derausstellung

    m

    Oberpflzer

    olkskundemuseum

    urglengenfeld,

    5 -166.

    This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture

    13/13

    94

    the

    world

    f

    music

    2(1)-

    2000

    Seifert,

    ike

    1 9

    "Hard

    ock

    Heavy

    etaln erserisen

    Presse. ammermusikr ehmmerte?"

    Rock

    ard 7:32-35.

    Stock,

    anfred

    Phillip

    hlberg

    1990

    Die

    Szene

    on nnen.

    kinheads,

    rufties,

    eavy

    Metals,

    unks. erlin:

    hristoph

    Links/Linksdruck.

    Stratmann,

    olger

    t l.

    2000

    "Rock

    nd olitik."

    ock ard

    52:22-33.

    Walser,

    obert

    1993 Runningithhe evil. owerGenderndMadnessnHeavy etal usic. anover:

    Wesleyan

    niversity

    ress.

    Weinstein,

    eena

    1 9

    Heavy

    etal.

    Cultural

    ociology.

    ew

    ork:

    exington

    ooks.