heavy metal forces of unification and fragmentation within a musical subculture
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
1/13
VWB - Verlag fr Wissenschaft und Bildung, Brenreiter, Schott Music GmbH & Co. KG and Florian Noetzel
GmbH Verlagare collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The World of Music.
http://www.jstor.org
VWB - Verlag fr Wissenschaft und Bildung
Brenreiter
Schott Music GmbH Co. KG
Florian Noetzel GmbH Verlag
Heavy Metal: Forces of Unification and Fragmentation within a Musical Subculture
Author(s): Bettina RoccorSource: The World of Music, Vol. 42, No. 1, Gothic, Metal, Rap, and Rave - Youth Culture andIts Educational Dimensions (2000), pp. 83-94Published by: VWB - Verlag fr Wissenschaft und BildungStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41699315Accessed: 21-12-2015 13:57 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of contentin a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/http://www.jstor.org/publisher/vwbhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41699315http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41699315http://www.jstor.org/publisher/vwbhttp://www.jstor.org/ -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
2/13
theworld
f
music
2(1)-
2000:
3-94
Heavy
Metal: Forces
of
Unification
and
Fragmentation
within a Musical Subculture
BettinaRoccor
Abstract
The
istory
fheavy
metal
eaches ack o he 960s.An
ndependent
ultural
rac-
tice
eveloped
n
he 970s
nd
xperienced
ts
heighturing
he
980s,
eclining
n
popularity
n he
ourse
f
he
ollowing
ecade.
oday
he
eavy
etalcene nGer-
many
sa
multifaceted
ultural
andscape
n
which
diversity
f
tyles
hat
eveloped
over hreeecadesoexistside y ide,more r ess eacefully.n pite f heir any
differences,
ost
ans
eel
hemselves
obe members
f
ne
amily
ecause ll
heavy
metal
tyles
re
based n he ame
asic
musical
atterns,
he alues
upporting
heir
culture
ave emained
redominantly
he
ame
nd hemusics
negativemage
as
unified
he
ans
n heir
ndignation.
1. Introduction
Those
whowant
o
approach
he
heavy
metal cenewith view owards
musical d-
ucation, ithoutmmediatelyisqualifyinghemselvesythe probablyew)metal
music
aficionados
resent
n
the
classroom,
hould
be
aware of a few
essential
things.
irst
f
all,
the
heavy
metal cene nvolves
musically
entered
ub-culture
without
deological
ommitmentsn the enseof a
political
uperstructure
o which
scenemembers
eel
hemselvesommitted
Stratmann
000,
Roccor
1996a,
Roccor
1996b,
Mhlmann
999).
So
you
hould
orget
he umors
ou
haveheard rread
up
to now hat
laim hat
eavy
metal nvolves
decidedly ight-wing
ultural
ractice:
heavy
metal
^and
Rechtsrock
right-wing
ock)
retwo
ompletely
ifferentusical
phenomena.
he kernel
f
heavy
metal s not
special
kind f
deology
ut ather
themusic f
heavy
metal.
verything
lse is
subject
o the
momentaryolitical,
o-
cal,
social and ndividualonditions ithinwhich hiskind f music s made and
consumed.
hus
here re few
heavy
metal ands
hat how
decided
olitical
tti-
tude n their
yricsmostly
ather
eft-wing,
utwithin he
blackmetal
cene,
ome
fascistic).
utthe
uestion
rises,
o
what xtent o
such
groups ctually
nfluence
theworld
iews ftheir
onsumers?
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
3/13
84
theworld
f
music
2(1)-
2000
This s indeed
ne of
the
most
mportant
esearch
uestions
egardingouth
nd
media:
do consumers
ccept
withoutriticism hatevers
presented
o
them,
r
are
they
n
a
position
o distance hemselvesnd to
develop
differentiatedalue
sys-
tem?
kin,
he
emale
inger
f
he and kunk
nasie,
oubts he
ersuadingoten-
tial
f
ong yrics:
I don't
elievehatmusic
an ransform
olitics,
ot ven
he
oliticalpinions
f he
people
who isten
o t.
Music s more
ommentary
n ife.Music anbe effective
when
t s bound
o n
already
xisting
ovement/mental
ttitude
r n milieu
s a
cultural
lement,
ommenting,
eflecting
nd
trengthening
hat
movement,
tc.But
then,hemovementsalreadyhere. usic idn'treatet.Music escribeshat as
happened
ith
generation,
hat as
happened
n he
world
n
whicht
ives,moves,
andwhich
thas
oface
Stratmann
000:30).
The
question
f
whether
usic
r
yrics
ontribute
t all to
formingpinions
ep-
resents
worthwhile
eneral
opic
or
music
nstruction.n
music
history
here
re
certainly
nough
xamples
f
political
monopolization
f music nd the
resulting
difficulties
n
dealing
with
works
f rt
nd heir
reators;
neneeds
nly
hink
fRi-
chard
Wagner
ndhis
role
during
he
period
f theNational
ocialists.
We willre-
turn
ater
othe
roblem
f
politically
otivated
se ofmusic.
2.
The Metal
Fans:
Deviant
Satanists?
The
message
f
heavy
metal
s-
to
emphasize
his
gain-
not
more ndnot
essthan
themusic
alled
heavy
metal.
And
thismusic
eflects
hediverse
worlds
f ts
fans,
of
people
whofeel
hemselves
ttracted,
or
he
most
aried
easons,
othis oud
kind
of
rockmusic
nd
ts
ymbolism.
f
you
sk
a
fan
why
he
istens
o
heavy
metal,
he
first
nswer
s almost
lways,
Because
like he
music."One
can
only
make tate-
ments
n
the easons
or
his
nstinctive
ympathy
or
heavy
metal
fone has nten-
sively ealtwithhe ife toriesf he ans. rite ssumptionsuch s thatt s factors
like
"coming
rom
roken
amilies"
r
"unemployment"
hich ead
consumerso
grab
or
eavy
metal
CDs
only
cratch
he urface
fthe ituation.
he
fans retoo
diverse
n
general,
nd
too different
re
thekinds
f
affinityhey
eel
owards he
metal
cene.
But
nthe
lassroom,
he
entral ole
fmusic
hould
lways
e
empha-
sized
n
order
o
give
tudents
n
adequate
dea
of
heavy
metal ulture.
The
heavy
metal an
efers
o
a
musical
radition
hat as
grown
ver
he ourse
of
decades,
tradition
rom
whichmost
f the
ontemporary
cene
has created
ts
self-understanding.
his
fact
sually
emains
oncealed
o critics
f he
heavy
metal
scene:
hey
nterpret
he
phenomena
f
heavy
metal
xclusively
n
thebasis
of the
symbolismccompanyinghemusic,whetherntheformf mages, igns, exts r
behavior.2
result
f
his s
the
negative
ublic
mage
f
he
heavy
metal
cene,
n-
changed
o the
present.
o
put
t
simply,
his
mage
declares
he
average
head-
banger"
o be
a latent
ight-wing
adical,
exist,
iolent,
lcoholic,
ebilitated
nd,
even
more,
atanically
social;
ll must
e
wary
f
him
cf.
Seifert
991,
Der
Spiegel
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
4/13
Roccor.
eavy
Metal
85
2/1989:152f,
ravo
35/1990:52f).
his
image
could
only
develop
because
heavy
metal as
been
nterpreted
ithout etailed
nowledge
f ts
historical
evelopment
andcurrent
tylisticiversity.
urther,
uch
nterpretations
ave
onlypaid
attention
to
the
xpressions
f ove for
heavy
metal hown
y
fans: n
exteriorhat eems e-
bellious,
rovocative,
ften
liched,
nd
beyond
ll other ashionablerends
Roc-
cor
1992).
3. The
Kernel
ofMetal: Music
The
roots
f
heavy
metal ie n the
1960s,
when ands ikeBlack
Sabbath,
ed
Zep-
pelin
nd
Deep Purple
made
popular
loud
and
guitar-heavy
ind f rock alled
"hard"
r
"heavy"
ock,
orming
counterweight
o the
ften
olitically
otivated
"hippie
music"
Herr
1998,
Khnemund
997,
Roccor
1996a,
1996b,
Walser1993
and
Weinstein
991).
From
hese
commerciallyuite
uccessful)
eginnings,
n n-
dependent
ultural
ractice
eveloped
uring
he1970s
with ands uch s Thin iz-
zy,
Nazareth,
ush
and
Rainbow,
which
eached heir
eight
f
popularity
n the
1980s.
Acts
uch
s Iron
Maiden,
Judas
riest,Metallica,
layer,
axon and
Ozzy
Osbourne
ormed,
oth n the
musical s
well as behavioral
evel,
he
tylistic
oun-
dation or his evelopmentalhase. nretrospect,his sregardeds thegolden ge
of
heavy
metal
nd s referred
o
as
such
by
thosewho
dentify
hemselves ith his
scene.
This
nchoring
fthe ntire
eavy
metal
cene
n
a common radition
as
is often
accentuated
o the
present)
houldnot
obscure hefact hat he
heavy
metal
and-
scape,
which
resents
tself
s
a
uniform
ubcultureo
outsiders,
as
fallen
nto
ew,
smaller
erritories
ince hemid-1980s.
ifferencesetween hese erritoriesie on
both
hemusical
s well as the
tylistic
nd
deological
evels. n additionothe
yp-
ical
heavy
metal
fthe ate 1970s and
early
980s,
tyles eveloped
rom hemid-
1980s
uch
s thrash etal
fast,
aw
inging,.g.,Slayer); peed
metal
fast,
echni-
cally
difficult,
.g.,
Metallica,
xciter);
eathmetal
without
heclassical
refrain,
"not eautiful"
inging,.g.,
Death,
Obituary)
ndblackmetal
stylistically
ariable,
satanist
ymbolism,
.g.,
King
Diamond,
Morbid
Angel).
ome
styles
ave
gained
numerically
maller
ut
ery
oyalbody
f
fans,
uch
s
progressive
etal
musical-
ly
complex,
riented
oward lassic
music,
.g.,
Blind
Guardian,
ream
Theater),
whitemetal
Christian
yrics,
musically
aried,
.g., Stryper,
ount
Raven)
and
doommetal
slow,
dragging,.g.,
St.
Vitus,
Candlemass).
articularly
n the
U.S.,
moderate
etal
cts
uch s
Ozzy
Osbourne,
otley
riie nd
Van Halen
conquered
the ecord
harts
uring
he1980s.
Inthe1990sheavymetal penedtself ptoneighboringtylesnd llowed le-
ments
rom
runge,
echno,
olk,
othic
nd hardcoreo
flow
nto tsmusic.At the
same
ime,
ew
isteners
merged
hono
onger orresponded
o the
ypical eavy
fan;
twas no
onger
contradictiono isten
o
first etallica
a
typical
metal
and)
and henMarusha
a
popular
echno-Djane).
he market
hanged,
hich
ed for x-
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
5/13
86
theworld
f
music
2(1)-
2000
ample
o he ormer
epresentative
f he
cene,
he
ournal
MetalHammer
changing
itsname
o
simply
ammern
order o draw
young
eaderswhowanted o
isten o
more
han
ust
metal. n this
ontext,
heworldwideuccessof theband
Metallica
was
highlymportant
or he cene.Whethern
positive
r
negative
ense,
his
and
still
timulates
iscussions
ithin he
ceneas it broke
way
from
many
ld tradi-
tions
nd hus
ncited kind
f
dentity
risis
mongmany
ans.
Today
he
gothic
metal
cene s
particularly
opular, style
hat ontainsntense
guitars
nd
s tied
o dramatics
nd
gloominess
ypical
f the
gothic
tyle. ypical
gothic
metal
ands
nclude
Atrocity, y Dying
Bride ndParadise
ost.
This cene
formedntandem ith he econd enerationftheblackmetalmovementfast,n-
clusion
f sacred
music
lements,
inging
hat
anges
rom
wheezing
o
screeching
(e.g.,
Dimmu
orgir,
mperor).
so-called
truemetal"
evival lso
took
lace
dur-
ing
he1990s
when
many
ands
harked
ack
o classical
heavy
metal nd
used
ypi-
cal
stylistic
eans
as
the
very
uccessful
roup
Hammerfall)
uch
s
high
ocaliz-
ing,
guitar
olos,
straight
hythms,
sword&
sorcery"
isual effects
nd
fantasy
lyrics.
Whilenumerous
ult ands
f he 980s
uch
s
Destruction,
gent
teel
nd
Metal
Church
eunited
o tie nto
heir
arlier
uccess,
new
bands lso
tried o
gain
fresh
uyers
or
heir
music
nder
he
heading
newmetal."
Today
he
metal
cene s
highly
iverse
n musical
erms,
ncluding
othmelo-
dramaticallads s wellas two-minute-longrind oreattacks.n addition othe
purely
musical
ifferences
hat
mostly
emain
idden
othe
utsider,
e also find
i-
verse
egional
eculiarities.
urther,
istinctions
mong
henumerous
an
roups
e-
velop
out
of
different
ife
ituations
nd even
between
riends.
ere
do not
only
mean
he
ategories
hat
igeonhole
ertain
ands
otheir
espective
ountriesf
or-
igin
for
U.S.
metal
elongs
s
little
o the
U.S. alone
s the uccess
fthe o-called
"
Neue
Deutsche
Hrte
(lit.,
new
German
ard)
group
ammstein
as been imited
to
Germany
Jeske
996/1997/1999,
ader
& Jeske
995,
1997
&
1998
andMhl-
mann
999).
Also
tobe
considered
re ssues
f nstrumentalization
f
hemusic
nd
the
ymbolism
hat
ccompanies
his
rocess.
4.
The
Fragmentation
f
Metal
F ans
According
o the
ocio-cultural
ontext,
eclaring
neself
fan
f
heavy
metal
rof
a
particular
and
rom
his
pectrum
antake
n different
eanings.
he
best
xam-
ple
of
this
s
theband
Slayer,
which
s
controversial
ithin he
cene
because f
ts
lyrics
nd
the
tatements
hey
ave
made
n
nterviews
ut lso
highly opular
e-
cause
of
ts
music.
The
band's
songs
hold
completely
ifferent
ignificance
or
group fright-wingaleteenage adicals romhe ormerastGermanyhan or
clique
of ntellectual
orth
orean
tudents
r
a Brazilian
metal
an
rom he
white
middle
lass.
t
is the
ontext
hich
s
decisive,
ot
necessarily
he
original
nten-
tions
f
theband
tself.
hus
hefan
lub
ogo
of
the
group
layer, grinning
kull
wearing
fireman's
elmet,
ecorates
-shirts,
atches
nd
pins
with
he words
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
6/13
Roccor.
eavy
Metal
87
above
t,
Slatanic
Wehrmacht
("Slatanic"
German rmed
orces).
ight-wing
ans
interpret
his
s a
declaration
f
sympathy
or
he
Nazi
period,
while
hose rom he
left-wing,
ntellectual
pectrum
ake hismotive o be
a
skillful
rovocation
f the
bourgeois
ociety
hat
uppresses
tsmemoriesf heNazis. Nazi skinheadsisten
o
Slayer
o stimulate
hem
o attack
oreigners,
hile
North orean tudents iscuss
philosophical
nd
political
opics
othe ounds f he and.Brazilian
ans
egard
he
group,
ith
ts
wo
South
American
members,
s a
spiritual
elative
o the alterna-
tive"national
eroes
f
Sepultura,
extremely
uccessful
hrashmetal
band
from
Rio.
Slayertself asmade uperficial,fnot osay ompletelyaive, tatementsn n-
terviews
n
political
opics,
nd
they
now
bout s much
boutNational
ocialism
as could
be written
n
a
single
heet f
paper.
ut his
idnot
prevent
hebandfrom
writing
song
bout he
oncentration
amp
doctor osef
Mengele.
Angel
fDeath"
goes
down
he
ist fhis
unimaginable
ctsof
cruelty
n a
choppy
ascade
of
words,
without
udging
r
commenting
n them.As
a
prank,
he
youth
adio
tation
f the
Bavarian
roadcastingompany
ncehad
this ext
ead n the ir
s
though
t
were
a
poem
by
the
well-known
oet
Gottfried
enn.Presented
n
this
way,
t created
goose
pimples
mong
non-metal
ans
s
well,
ust
as when
layer lays
he
ong
n
live
concerts.
The example fSlayer howsthatheavymetal lso representsform fart,
which
s
thus
nterpretable;
ach fan
nterprets
he
tatements,
mages
nd
yrics
f
the
band
differently.
ut
the
arge
majority
s
not t
all interested
n whatkind
f
statement
s
being
made,
for
xample,
n the
ong
Angel
f Death."
They
ikethe
song,
he
music,
he
vocal
style;
hey
ould
are ess
about he ontents
fthe
yrics.
This s
one
reason
why
many
ans
re
rritated
henmetal
ournalists
sk
uncomfort-
able
questions
bout
ontroversial
usicians
ikePeter
teele
or
Slayer
nd
the n-
tentions
ftheir
ong yrics.
hey
ind
hemusic
ood,
nd
they
on't
want oknow
any
more.
his
s
what s also
meant
y
he tatement
hat
hemetal cene an be
de-
scribed
s
nonpolitical:
he
meanings
f
yrics
nd
mages
s of
esser
mportance
compared
o a
song's
musical
ualities.
n
right-wing
ock,
he ituations
the
ppo-
site: he
yrics
re n
the
oreground
nd
he
ery
imple, unk-like
usic orms
nly
an
acoustic
ackground
othe
houted azi
slogans.
In
view
f he
many
arieties
f
heavy
metal
ypes,
s well s the ocial
differenc-
es
among
ts
fans,
whether
elated
o
class,
gender, ge
or
ethnicity,
he
question
emerges
s
to
why
he
heavy
metal
ulture
till
perceives
tself s a
single
ulture.
The
scene
ontinuouslyresents
tself o the
utsideworldwith
nbroken
ride
s a
unified
ntity,
lthough
hose
iewing
t
from he
utside an
see
little
ommonality
between,
ay,
the
gothic
metal
cene and
progressive
ans,
r
between raditional
"metals"ndblackmetal ans.Both n theirlothings wellas in their ehavior nd
musical
ractices,
ans
display
lear
differences
mong
hemselves
nd make lear
attempts
o set
up
borders
ith
eighboring
ubstyles
ndtheir lienteles.
Each
type
f
heavy
metal
as
developed
tsown
ystem
f
signs
made
of
music,
symbolism,
lothing
nd behavior.
n
theblackmetal
cene,
or
nstance,
he
black,
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
7/13
88
the
world
f
music
2(1)-
2000
studded
eather
lothing
ntroduced
n the
arly
1980s
by groups
ikeJudas
riest,
Mercyful
ate
or Motrhead
as revived
uring
heradicalization
f black
metal;
outfits
ere
modified
y
adding
ccessories rom
hematically
elated
ubcultures.
The
black
metal
utfit
ncludes
hreateningly
ong, piked
racelets,
lack
ederhose,
vampire-like
apes,
heavy
lack
ied-up
oots
ndbizarre
lack-and-white
akeup.
Martial
rts
weapons
ike
battle-axes,
aces
nd
outsized words
omplete
he m-
age
of
the
dangerous
night
f
darkness.
he
masquerade
f "merciless"
epresents
an
optical
ounterpart
o the
music.
he atter
hould
e more
adical
nd
relentless
than
nything
hat
ad
previously
elighted
eavy
metal
ans.All
elements,
hether
in heyrics,he elf-presentationf hemusiciansr he tage hows, it nto he ign
system
f
"black
metal."
his
system
s
also
supported
y
the
music,
with
ts
high-
speed
double
ass,
torms
friffs
nd
ts
ometimes
verboard
ysterics,
ometimes
choppy
inging,
hich
s
accompanied
y
dramatic
horuses
nd chords
n the
or-
gan.
The
fans
who
ove
this
music
rient
hemselves
ptically
o the
musicians,
ut
usually
hoose
or
hemselves
more
moderate
treet
ersion
f
he ebellious
orror
outfits.
In
case
of
doubt,
earing
ong
hair
nd
fan
hirt,
he
niform
f
hemetal
an,
s
enough
or
ll
outsiders
o
recognize
person
s
belonging
o themetal
cene.
De-
tails
ell
nsiders
he
person's
references
or
particular
eavy
tyle,
uch
s
the
shirtmotivendtheparticularccessorieshat reworn. orexample crossworn
upside-down
ith
strongly
lienating
and
ogo
is
an
indication
or
he
person's
passion
or
lack
metal.
Otherwise
he ndividual
eed
for
xpression
ecides
how
many
dditional
lothing
lements
re
taken
ver
from
he
musicians.
fan
ould
decide
o
wear
martial
rts-related
ilver
ewelry
the
upside-down
ross
or
penta-
gram,
tuds
r
chains)
r
makeup-
orelse
can make
do without
ny
utside
igns
f
belonging
o
the
cene
and
simply
uy
black
metal
CDs
and
go
to concerts
f the
bands.
In
contrast
o
the adical
lack
metal
cene
which
s
at
themoment
articularly
popularmong ounger
ans
n
Germany),
he
raditionalists'
cene
has
taken
p
the
fight
or
he
good
old"truemetal." his
scene,
whichs also
quite
ctivenow,
pro-
claims
ts
onvictions
articularly
n
fanzines.
or
he
raditionalists,
eath
ndblack
metal
o not
ven
belong
o
heavy
metal.
heir
rguments
gainst
eath
nd
black
metal
xtend
rom
he
uality
f
themusic
too
dilettantish)
o
the ust
or
ommer-
cial
success
t
any
ost,
othe
yrics,
hich
re aid
tocross
ll
boundaries
f aste
n
order
o ncrease
ales.
This
traditionalist
roup
wears
lothing
xactly
ike
that
f
the
ans
fthe
1980s:
ight-fitting
eans,
neakers,
and
hirts
nd
a kind
f
monk's
habit,
n
which
atches
with he
names
f
particular
ands
have
been
ewn.
his
out-
fit
roclaims,
I
am
a metal
Urgestein
lit.,
riginal
ock,
r
an
original,
oyal
fan)
and 'mnot shamedf t."This truemetal" actioneesto t hathe ands
rom
he
1970s
and
80s
are
not
forgotten;
hey
lay
he
role
of
Heimatpfleger
caretakers
f
traditional
ustoms,
word
sually
sed
n
connection
ith
olk
ulture),
ho
dig
up
and
revive
he
old
song
epertoire."
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
8/13
Roccor.
eavy
Metal
89
Trench
warfare
ithinhe
heavy
metal cene s one
factorhat asmarkedtsde-
velopment,
hether
etween black"
nd
"white"
ommunities,
etween oft ock
and
deathmetal
ans,
r between
olitically
ctive
nd
disinterestedans. urther-
more,
ince
he ate
1980s
metal-typical
an ulture as
experienced diluting ro-
cess
due
to
the
teadily
rowing roup
f isteners ho isten
o
not
nly eavy
metal
but lso
formerly
enemy
musics"
uch s
hiphop,
echno,
ndependent
ndrelated
substyles.
husmass
heavy
metalmusical vents
eld t the ndofthe 0th
entury
such
s the
pen
irconcert Rock
am
Ring"presented
colorfulmixture
f musi-
cians
of
completely
ifferent usical
ypes.
en
years go,
t wouldhave beenun-
thinkableor uchgroupsoappear ogethern onestage.n reactionothis,ndivid-
ual
scenes
re
establishing
vents
hat
resent
xclusively
heir
wnbands
e.g.,
he
Wacken
Open
Air
or the
Dynamo
Open
Air
n Eindhoven
ormetal
ans;
heZillo-
Festival
rGothicAVave-Treffen
n
Leipzig
for heblack
cene).
What s
put
n
dis-
play
t
uch vents
s the
pure
octrine,"
hether
n a
musical,
ptical
rbehavioral
level.
This
s for
hemetal
an
chaoticmud
fight,
or hewaver
he killful
resen-
tation
f he
perfectly
tyled
elf.
till,
hemetal cene
fightsgainst
nconsistencies
resulting
rom
he imitlessness
f the
marketnd
theno
longer
xistent
eparation
between
mainstream
nd
underground
at
east n the
art
f hemusic
ndustry).
5.
Forces
of
Unification
As
mentioned
arlier,
eavy
metal
ontinues
o
represent
tself
o the utside
world
as a closed
cultural
ystem,
system
n which
he ame aws
apply
s
twenty ears
ago.
The
foundation
f this
proudly
roclaimed
elf-understanding
eemsto be
a
continuing
onsensus
n whatmakes
heavy
metal
ndependent
rom
ther
tyles.
y
means
fdiverse
trategies,
he
eadership
f
magazines
nd
fanzines,
or
xample,
swear
o a
common
enominator
hat s
supposed
omaintainhe
pirit
f
heavy
met-
al over ndaboveall stylisticoundaries.nmy pinion
here re
n
particular
hree
such
factorshat
llegedly
nsure
hat
eavy
metal
emains a beast hat
efuses o
die:"4
Firm
ies
o a common
musical
radition.
Recognition
ffundamental
eavy
metal
alues.
Negative
valuation
y
outsiders.
As
soon
s
a new
tyle
or
the eaction
o
t)
coincides
t east
partially
ith hese
three
actors,
t
an
be
integrated
nto
he
heavy
metal
ultures a whole.
Before his
happens,
certain
hase
f
uncertaintyay
lso
emerge,
uring
hich
much iscus-
sion
nd
polemicizing
ake
lace.
Generational
onflicts
lay
n essential ole
nthis
integrationrocess. heolder ans sually eact irstna way hat ejectshatwhich
is
produced
ndfavored
y
he
younger
eneration
ecause ften
henew
tyle ues-
tions
he
xisting
radition
nd
produces
ew
ways
f
measuring
usical,
yrical
nd
behavioral
rovocation.
good example
fthis
s the
group
eathmetal,
hich n-
stigated
oth
ndignation
s well
as
enthusiasm.
heirmusic ontained
heezing
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
9/13
90
theworld
f
music
2(1)
-2000
voices nstead
f
high,
lear
vocalization,
storm friffsnstead f
guitar
olos,
nd
morbid
yrics
nstead f
hymns
othe
peacefulness
f
he
ock n roll
ifestyle.
n
the
end,
hough,
he
many
ritics romhe
heavy
metal cenehad o
grudgingly
cknowl-
edge
that
his
generation
f metal ans nd musicians
re
doing
nothing
ore han
what
hey
hemselves
ad donefive r
ten
years
arlier. he
younger eneration
s
shocking
he "old
guys"
nd
showing
hem hat he extremes
ave not
yet
been
reached
y
ny
tretch
fthe
magination.
ven
funder
rotest,
eathmetal
as fi-
nally
ccepted,
nd
here
was
peace
until he
next ew
tyle merged.
he new
tyle
that aused
stir-
meaning
hat t
delighted
ome
ndlessly
nd madeothers hake
their eadswith orror-was the adical tyle fblackmetal.n thisway, he ultural
spectrum
f
heavy
metal
has been
continually
roadened
new
without
aving
o
give
up
that
which
lready
xisted.
After
ll,
the
younger,
ebellious ands
lso em-
phasize
epeatedly
he nfluence
nd
nspiration
hey
avereceived
rom heir
rede-
cessors.)
he
ndependence
f
he ubscenes
hus
orms
nly superficial
ontrast
o
the
propagated
nity
f
the ulture
s a
whole.The
musical
oundation,
hat
s,
the
collective
eroes
nd
themusical
heritage,
njoys
uninterrupted
espect
oth rom
the
younger
s well
as the lder
an
generations,
ndthis
reates
iesbetween
hem.
Today
he
cene
hasthe
major
roblem
hat
othing
ew r
provocative
as
appeared
on
thehorizon
or
uite
while.Musicians
re
quoting
hemselves
nd
stewing
n
theirwnuices,which ausesmany ans opredicthe ndofheavymetal.
In
spite
fall
their
ifferences,
hat
ontributes
onsiderably
o the we
feeling"
of
the cene
s the
negative erception
mong
utsiders
fthe
heavy
metal
ulture.
The
heavy
metal
cene
s a
conglomerate
f
numerous
lichs,
ot
nly
or
he
gno-
rant mateur
ut lso
for
many rofessionals
ho
give
scholarly, hilosophical
r
journalistic
ommentary
n
heavy
metal.
he
long-haired
igure
earing
monk's
habit
as become
symbol
or he
dull,
thically
isoriented
attle-like
asses
who
can
only
be shaken
ut
of their
ethargy
y
means
of
brainless,
mercilessly
oud,
stamping
usic
without
ny
kind
f
meaningful
ontents.
imply
he act
hat ome-
one"belongs"
o a certain
musical
genre
ecomes
vidence
or
whole
tring
f
characteristics
hat re
ttached
othat
eclared an. he reactionothis
negative
a-
beling
s on
the ne hand
collective,
more-or-less
ustified
ndignation,
s
well as
the
mergence
f
"we
feeling"-
hat
s,
he
erception
f we
who re
unjustifiably
attacked."
his
martyr
onsciousness"
as
been
driven o new
heights y
he
group
Die
Bhsen
Onkelz.
his
group
trained
ts
mage
s an
unjustifiably
ttacked
ictim
of
themedia
o
the imit.
ue
to the
group's
never
ontested
ast
s
skinheads,
he
media
ccused
hem
f
having
ome
responsibility
or
he eries
f
anti-foreigner
t-
tacks
made
n
Germany
uring
he
arly
990s.
ome of
the rsonists
ho
etfire
o
houses
where
sylum-seekers
ived
had
wornOnkelz
hirts,
nd
n the
arly
980s
thebandhada song n tsrepertoireith he itle Trken aus" TurksGo Home)
which
was
however
ever
ublished.
n the
asis
of hese
acts,
he
ress
oncluded
that
ie Bhsen
Onkelz
was an
deological
redecessor
f
growing
ight-wing
adi-
calism.
ven
hough
heband
epeatedly
istanced
tself rom
he
ight-wing
adical
scene,
nd
even
organized
Rock
Against
he
Right-wing"
estivals,
any
media
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
10/13
Roccor.
eavy
Metal
91
representatives
nsisted
n this view.
Indignation
ver
the
unjustified
reatment
brought
ogether
he
and nd
ts
ans,
which s
why
Onkelz ans ancount n
at
east
one
song
on each
new
recording
ith he heme We are the
capegoats
f the
na-
tion."
As this
xample
hows,
indingogether
ans
eyond tylistic
orderss the om-
mon
knowledge
hat
many
f
the
heavy
metal
lichs re
basedon a too
iteral
er-
ception
f he
cene
nd hat hismusic
ctually ays
much
more
hat s
socially
ele-
vant han
s
commonly
ssumed.
isagreements
ver ndividual
trategies
n
how o
deal with
ttacks
rom
he utside
o however
ave
separating
ffect.
While ome
make ffortsoward larificationnddialogue, thers rawback nto till tronger
forms
f
provocation.
he
atter
ick
up
the
gauntlet
hrownown
by
ritics
ith e-
ligious
r
youth-protection
otivations
nd
answer
hesewith till
rasser lichs
that
elp
hemselves
o all
the
ignals
hat erve
rt. ome
even
resort
o
violence,
s
in he adical
lack
metal
cene
n
Norway,
here
anatics
ent o far
s to setfire
o
churches
nd o
carry
utbrutal
ttacks
n
Christian
ands
Roccor
1992,
Billerbeck
& Nordhausen
994
andKrull
1993).
Heavy
metal
s
not,
s
so often
sserted,
imply
oud,
primitive
ockbut ather
form
fmusic
hat
tands
or
particular
ttitude
owards
ife,
or alues
hat he
ans
miss
n their
ormal
veryday
orld nd
which
hey
not
rarely
ind n
themetal
scene. repeat ere nly hemostmportantatchwordshat rerepeatedlysedby
fans
nd
musicians:
uthenticity,
onesty,
olidarity,
ohesion,
ommunity
eeling,
the
lain
ruth
ithout
dornment,
irectness,
oyalty,
ithout
ompromise,
onesty,
provocation,
eing
different.
bsolute
ounter-values
or
he scene
are:
salability,
playing
p
to
norms,
ommercialization,
gomania,
osing,
ensorship.
ne of
the
central
oncepts
f themetal
cene
s
that f
freedom: reedom
o
say
what
one
wants,
o
think
hat ne
wants,
o ook
s one
wants,
ithout
egard
f
reigning
or-
als.
For
this
eason,
hemusicians
who
enjoy
he
highest
egree
f admirationre
those
who
practice
heavy
metal
tyle
f
ifewith
he east
degree
f
compromise.
These
are musicians
who
have
themselves
attooed
ver their ntire
odies,
who
grow
heir
air own
otheir
ips,
who
prefer
o
wear he ame lothes
ay
n nd
day
out
and
who remain
nconditionally
rue
o the
deepermeaning
f
heavy
metal n
their
music
nd
yrics,
egardless
f newer
rends r sales
figures.
o
do
your
wn
thing
nd
o et
ll kinds f
riticism
lide ff
ou:
his
epresents
he dealof hemet-
al scene-
an
deal,
t hould
e
noted,
hat
tands
iametrically
pposed
othe ctual
lives
ofmost
ans.
6.
Conclusion
For
those
who
want o
approach
he
heavy
metal
cene,
wouldrecommend
irst
bearing
he
ollowing
nmind
speaking
rom
many
ears
f
experience):
he
argest
barrier
s the
xisting
lich n
one's own
head.One must
earn o
perceive
he
erson
behind
he
bloodthirstyooking
-shirt
nd
to
comprehend
is or her
ppearance
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
11/13
92
theworld
f
music
2(1)-
2000
simply
s an
expression
f
being
fan,
withoutash
nterpretations
bout
he
possi-
ble
conceptual
ontent.
mportant
s that hefan s
always
he
xpert. econdly,
he
researchers
hould t east
ttempt
o
get
sed
o
the
music,
or f
hey
ave
noknowl-
edge
ofthe
music,
hey
willbe able to find ut ittle bout ts
fans.
hird,
nvestiga-
tors
hould bstain
rom ash
ategorizations,
or
he
fine ifferencesre
precisely
what
s
mportant
othe
metal an.
A finalword f
dvice:
nevermake hemistake f
describingeavy
metal s "noise"-
orBon Jovi
s a
heavy
metal
roup.
hat
would
mean
he ertain
ndof
ny
kind fconversation.
Notes
1
The
ssertion
as
eenmade
hat
eavy
etal as
he
endency
owards
ight-wing
adicalism,
for
xample
nLenz 989
nd
er
piegel
4/1998:304;
riticism
f his iew
an efound
n
Helsper
992,
tock
Mhlberg
990
ndMatthesius
995.
his oes ot
meanhat
herere
no
heavy
etal ans
ith radical
ight-wing
rientation.
hese
o
exist,
ust
s the
sually
overlooked
onpolitical
nd eft-
ing-oriented
kinhead
cenes.
ee Farin
Seidel-Pielen
1994
nd
unk-Hennigs
995.
2
This
olds
rue
articularly
n
he
se f
atanicr
ccult
ymbols
n
heavy
etal.
ee heit-
eraturen pponentsfChristianock,uchs Banol 987, umer984ndGlogauer
992.
3
On
he
tyles
f
heavy
etal,
eeRoccor
996a
nd 996b.
4
A formulation
fDeena
Weinstein
9
1
5
On he
etailed
istory
fDie
Bhsen
nkelz,
eeHartsch
997.
References
Banol,
ernando
alazar
1987
Die
okkulte
eite
esRock.
nchen:
irthammer.
Bumer,
lrich
1984
Wir ollen
ur eine
eele.
ardrock:
aten,
akten
Hintergrnde.
ielefeld:
hris-
tliche
iteraturverbreitung.
Billerbeck,
iane
Frank
ordhausen
1994
Der
Mordfall
andro
.Berlin:
H.
Links.
Farin,
laus
Eberhard
eidel-Pielen
1994
Skinheads.
nchen:
.
H. Beck.
Funk-Hennings,
rika
1995
"Skinheadmusik,
i-Musik,
azi-Rock."
ahrbuch
r
Volksliedforschung
0: 84-
101.
Glogauer,
erner
1 92
"Videoclips
om
eufel,
ergewaltigen
ndMorden
Sic .
Verharmlosende
tudie
er
Landesmedienanstalten."
(ugend)-M(edien)-S(chutz)-Report
:
44-48.
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
12/13
Roccor.
eavy
Metal
93
Hartsch,
dmund
1997
Danke
r
ichtsBhse
nkelz.
rankfurtmMain: O
Management.
Helsper,
erner
1992
Okkultismus-
ieneue
ugendreligion?
ie
Symbolik
esTodes
nd
esBsenn er
Jugendkultur.pladen:
eske nd udrich.
Herr,
atthias
1989-98
atthias
err'
Heavy
Metal exikon
vols. -6.Berlin:
elbstverlag
1989/1990/
1991/1994/1996/1998].
Jeske,
tger
t l.
1996-99.S.Metal,ols. -3. erlin:.P.Verlageske/MaderbR1996/1997/1999].
Khnemund,
tz
t l.
1997
Rock
ard
nzyklopdie.
00 er
nteressantestenockbands
usden
etzten
reiig
Jahren.
ortmund:
ock
ard.
Krull,
lex
1
93
"Von atanisten
nd ierschtzern."
ock ard
0:6-8.
Lenz,
eter
1989
"It sn't ock'n
oll,
hat's
hy
e ike
t. aschistischend
atanistischeendenzen
des
Heavy
Metal
mKontext
erGeschichte
erRockmusik."
nRock
yrik.
xem-
plarische
nalysen
nglischsprachiger
ong-Texte
Erhardahl/Karsten
hrkorb,
eds. ssen: ieBlaue ule, 88-212.
Mader,
atthias,
tger
eske,
t l.
1995
NWoBHM.
he
loryays.
erlin:.P.
Verlag
eske/MaderbR.
1997
New
Wave
f
ritish
eavy
etal
vol. .
Berlin:.P.
Verlag
eske/MaderbR.
1998
Heavy
etal ade
n
Germany.
erlin:.P.
Verlag
eske/Mader
bR.
Matthesius,
eate
1 95
"DieBhsen
nkelz
mehrls ine
echtekinheadmusikband."
ugendwohl
,
1 1
5.
Mhlmann,
diger
1999
Letzte
usfahrt:
ermania.in
hnomenamenseue eutscherte. erlin:
.P.
Verlag
eske/Mader
bR.
Roccor,ettina
1992
Heavy
etal.
ine
antypologie
nhand
on
leidung.
egensburg:
niversitte-
gensburg
unpublished
aster's
hesis).
1994
"Heavy
etal.
ewaltdarstellung
der
ewaltverherrlichung?"
n
GewaltnderKul-
tur,
olf
W.
Brednich,
alter
artinger,
ds.Passau: assauertudienurVolk-
skunde,
45-58.
1996a
Heavy
etal-
unst,ommerz,
etzerei.
erlin:.P.
Verlag
eske/MaderbR.
1996b
Heavy
etal-
ie
Bands,
ie
ans,
ie
Gegner.
nchen:.H.Beck.
1997
"Crossover.tilistische
renzberschreitungen
nden 0er nd 0er ahren."nTech-
no. wischenokalkolorit
ndUniversalstruktur.ermann
rtmaier,
onald
itzler,
Franz
uber,
ichaela
fadenhauer,
ds.Mnchen:okumentationum
Workshop
imHaus er ugendarbeitnMnchenm 4.und 5.Januar997,9-62.
Roccor,
ettinaMartin
telzer
1995
"Heavy
etal-Clubs.nMnner-Kulturened.
Burglengenfeld:egleitheft
ur on-
derausstellung
m
Oberpflzer
olkskundemuseum
urglengenfeld,
5 -166.
This content downloaded from 200.16.89.152 on Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:57:57 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
7/24/2019 Heavy Metal Forces of Unification and Fragmentation Within a Musical Subculture
13/13
94
the
world
f
music
2(1)-
2000
Seifert,
ike
1 9
"Hard
ock
Heavy
etaln erserisen
Presse. ammermusikr ehmmerte?"
Rock
ard 7:32-35.
Stock,
anfred
Phillip
hlberg
1990
Die
Szene
on nnen.
kinheads,
rufties,
eavy
Metals,
unks. erlin:
hristoph
Links/Linksdruck.
Stratmann,
olger
t l.
2000
"Rock
nd olitik."
ock ard
52:22-33.
Walser,
obert
1993 Runningithhe evil. owerGenderndMadnessnHeavy etal usic. anover:
Wesleyan
niversity
ress.
Weinstein,
eena
1 9
Heavy
etal.
Cultural
ociology.
ew
ork:
exington
ooks.