hematopoietic stem cell transplant for … cell disease: ... § in africa, newborn children born...

25
2/11/16 1 Karen Sweiss, PharmD, BCOP Clinic al Assistant Professor Clinical Pharmacist in Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Department of Pharmacy Practice University of Illinois College of Pharmacy Chicago, IL HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT FOR SICKLE CELL DISEASE: PERSPECTIVES FROM CHILDHOOD TO ADULTHOOD Disclosures I have no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program/presentation. Objectives Define the pathogenesis and clinical sequelae of sickle cell disease (SCD) in pediatric and adult patients Identify theindicationsfor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric and adult patients with SCD Explain the immunology underlying the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in SCD Compare the efficacy andtoxicity ofthe various preparative regimens used in pediatric and adult patients with SCD

Upload: phamnhu

Post on 26-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

2/11/16

1

KarenSweiss, PharmD,BCOPClinical Assistant Professor

Clinical Pharmacist inHematologyandStemCell TransplantDepartmentofPharmacyPractice

Universityof I llinois College ofPharmacyChicago, IL

HEMATOPOIETICSTEMCELLTRANSPLANTFORSICKLECELLDISEASE:PERSPECTIVESFROM

CHILDHOODTOADULTHOOD

Disclosures• Ihave noactual orpotential conflict of interestin

relation tothis program/presentation.

Objectives• Definethepathogenesisandclinicalsequelaeofsickle

cell disease (SCD) inpediatric and adult patients

• Identify theindicationsforallogeneic hematopoieticstem cell transplantation in pediatricand adultpatientswithSCD

• Explaintheimmunologyunderlyingtheuseof allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in SCD

• Compare theefficacyandtoxicityofthevarious preparative regimensusedinpediatricandadultpatientswithSCD

2/11/16

2

SickleCellDisease:AGlobalBurden• Incidence1

§ Affects 90,000to100,000Americans§ Occursamong~1outofevery 500BlackorAfrican-American births

§ InAfrica,newborn childrenbornwithSCDestimated tobe200,000to300,000

• Mortality2§ Killsnearlyhalfamillionpeopleannually

• EconomicCosts2

§ ForadultswithSCDthe average annualcostofmedicalcareexceeds 35,000USdollarsperyear

1h ttp ://www.cd c.go v/n cbddd /sicklecel l /d ata.h tml .Accessed November1 0 ,2 0 1 52Bo lano s-Meade Jetal . B lood Reviews.2 0 1 4;2 8:2 43 -8

SCD:Pathophysiology

h ttp ://sgugenetics.pbwo rks.com/w/page/6 1 1 7 2 3 0 4 /P athophysio lo gy%2 0 of%2 0 Sickle%2 0 Cel l%2 0AnemiaAccessed November 1 2 ,2 0 1 5

SCD:ClinicalSequelae

Rees DC etal . Lan cet.2 0 1 0 ;3 76 (9 75 7):2 01 8-3 1.

2/11/16

3

SCDMortalityRiskFactorsRisk Factor MSH

n=299CSSCDn=3764

CSSCDn=1056

Episode ofAcute ChestSyndrome (ACS) X X X

≥ 3pain crisis annually X

Hgb F <0.5 g/dL X X

Anemia withlow reticulocyte counts X

Renal Failure X X

Seizure History X

Elevated WBC X

Stroke X

Sickle cell lung disease and retinopathy X

Leg Ulcers XMSH:Mu ltice n te rStudyo fHyd roxyu re a in Sickle Ce ll Anemia,C SSCD:Coope rative StudyofSickle Ce ll Dise ase Hbg F:Fe tal Hemoglob in ,WBC :Wh ite Blood Ce ll

Steinberg MHetal . JAMA. 2 00 3;2 89 (13 ):16 45 -51 .P lattOSetal . NEn gl JMed .1 9 9 4;3 30 (23 ):1 6 39 -44 .P owarsDR etal . Med icin e (Bal timo re).2 0 05 ;84 (6):36 3 -7 6.

SCDManagement

Supportive

ErythropoietinStimulating Agents

Bloodtransfusion

IronChelation

Symptomatic

Analgesics

Bloodtransfusions

Antibiotics

Prevention

Penicillin/Vaccinations

Bloodtransfusions

Hydroxyurea

Rees DC etal . Lan cet.2 0 1 0 ;3 76 (9 75 7):2 01 8-3 1.

TreatmentofAdultSCD

Treatmentchallenges:§ Lack of compliance tolong-term medications§ Overuse and dependence of narcotics§ Loss of productivity§ Psychological symptoms inadulthood

Chakrabarti Setal . B io l B lood MarrowTran sp lan t. 20 04 ;1 0(1 ):23 -31 .

Clinical courseworsens inadulthood

TreatmentChallenges

Mortality sharplyincreases everydecade over 20

years old

2/11/16

4

Whatareothertreatmentoptionstoimprove

mortality forAdultSCDpatients?

Hematopoietic CellTransplant

(HCT)

SCDandTransplant:Ahistoricalperspective

As of 2013,there were 1238BMTs forSCT reported toCIBMTR andEBMT-Eurocord

Appelb aum FR . NEn gl JMed ;3 57 :1 4 72 -75C IBMTR:Cen ter fo r In tern ational B lood and MarrowTran sp lan tRegistryEBMT:Eu ropean B lood and MarrowTran sp lan t

SCDandHCTEBMT-Eurocord(1986– 2013)

CIBMTR(1986– 2012)

Transplantations forSCD

Total 611 627

TypeofDonor

HLA-identical 487 430

CordBlood relatedandunrelated

73 71

Haploidentical donor 34 61

Otherunrelateddonor 17 65

Overall Survival

1year 95%± 1% 96%± 2%

2year 94%± 1% 94%± 1%

Gluckman E.ASHedu cation book2 0 13 ;37 0 -3 7 6

2/11/16

5

BenefitversusriskinHCTforSCD• Prolonged lifespan• No clinical vaso-occlusive events• Improved quality of life• Cessation of anemia and RBCtransfusions

• Fewer hospitalizations

Benefits

• GVHD• Infertility• Delayed immunereconstitution/infection

• Treatment-related malignancy• Death

Risks

Shenoy S.Hemato lo gyAmSo c Hemato l Edu c P rogram.2 0 1 1 ;2 73-9

ChallengesinSCDpatients• Patient selection and timingof transplant

§ Stilladebate astowhoandwhentransplant shouldoccur

• Limited patient eligibility§ Disease andage-related comorbiditiesresultinhighermorbidityandmortality inolderpatients

• HCT not available tomost patients§ Socioeconomicsetting§ Absence ofmatchedrelated donor

• Serious concerns about transplant-related mortality§ GVHD, infertility, treatment-induced malignancy

Shenoy S.Hemato lo gyAmSo c Hemato l Edu c P rogram.2 0 1 1 ;2 73-9

ChallengesinSCDpatients

• Donoravailability§ 25% probability of being HLA-matched to sibling§ 19% chance of finding potential alleleic 8/8MUD

• Patientperception§ 62%werewillingto accept >10% TRM§ 30%willingtoaccept 30% TRM§ 50%werewillingto accept infertility§ 20%willingtoaccept chronic GVHD

Chakrabarti S.BoneMarrowTran sp lan t2 0 0 7 ;39 :44 7-4 51

TRM : tran sp lan t-related mo rtal i ty

2/11/16

6

HCTOptionsforSCD• Majorityof transplantsperformed• PreferredduetolowGVHD/graftfailure• Siblingswithsicklecell traitaresuitabledonors

Matchedsiblingdonor

• RelatedorunrelatedUCBtransplantshavebeenperformed• SlowerneutrophilrecoveryandlessGVHDUmbilical cord

• LimiteddataevaluatingMUD forSCD• SCURT(Sickle cell unrelateddonortransplant) study

Matchedunrelateddonor

• Post-transplantcyclophosphamide• Lowratesof GVHDandgraftfailure

HLA-haploidentical

Shenoy S.Hemato lo gyAmSo c Hemato l Edu c P rogram.2 0 1 1 ;2 73-9

FirstSCDtransplant

• First successfulHCTinan8yeargirlwithSCD1

§ Matched-siblingdonor(MSD) withsicklecelltrait§ Myeloablative conditioningregimen:CY120mg/kgover2daysandTBI11.5Gy

§ GVHD prophylaxis:MTXandmethylprednisolone§ Patient curedofbothAMLandSCD§ Proof-of-principleforfuture platforms tostudyHCTinSCD

• Walters etal2 studyof22patients§ MSD usingBu/CY/ATG§ EFS andOSat4years 91%and73%,respectively§ Graft failure19%

1John son FL.NEn gl JMed 19 8 4;31 1 :7 8 02WaltersMC etal . NEn gl JMed 1 9 9 6;33 5 (6):36 9 -7 6

IndicationsforHCTinPediatricSCD

Age<16yearsold

HLA-identical sibling

• Stroke• ACSw/recurrenthospitalizationsorpreviousexchangetransfusions• Recurrentvaso-occlusivepainorrecurrentpriapism• AbnormalMRIorimpairedneurophysiologicalfunction• Stage IorIIsickle lungdisease• Sickle nephropathy(moderatetosevereproteinuria,GFR30-50%predictedvalue)

• Bilateralproliferativeretinopathy• Osteonecrosisof multiplejoints• Redcell alloimmunizationduringlong-termtransfusiontherapy

SymptomaticSCD(1ormorebelow)

WaltersMC etal . NEn gl JMed .1 99 6 ;3 35 (6 ):3 69 -76 .

2/11/16

7

IndicationsforHCTinAdultSCD

Age≥16yearsold

HLA-identical sibling

• Irreversible end-organdamage• Stroke orclinically signif icant CNS event• Elevated TRV ≥2.6m/s• Sickle-related renal insuff iciency(Cr≥1.5times theULN orbiopsyproven)• Sickle hepatopathy( includingironoverload)• Reversible sickle complicationnotameliorated byhydroxyurea• TwoormoreVOCrequiring hospitalizationsforseveral years• AnyACSwhile onhydroxyurea

SymptomaticSCD(1ormorebelow)

Hsieh MM etal . B lood.20 11 ;11 8(5 ):11 97 -12 07.

HCTinpediatricSCD• Publishedresultsareexcellent

§ Fourlargeseriesreportoutcomesofmorethan250children

§ Medianagelessthan10years• Patients

§ DonorswereHLA-identicalsiblings§ High-riskpatientpopulation§ Receivedfullymyeloablativeconditioningregimens

• Outcomes§ Graftrejection7-18%§ OS93-100%§ HCTeliminatesvaso-occlusivesymptomsandreversessomeof theendorgandamage

Watlers MC etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t20 15 ;pi i :S1 0 83 -8 79 1

MSDwithMACregimeninPediatricSCDVermylen etal1(n=50)

Walters etal2(n=50)

Bernaudin etal3 (n=185)

Panepinto etal4(n=67)

Dedeken et al5(n=50)

Lucarelli etal6(n=40)

Conditioningregimen Bu/CY± TLI Bu/CYATG oralemtuzumab

Bu/CY± ATG Bu/CY Bu/Cy± ATG Bu/Cy/ATG

GVHDprophylaxis CSA,ATG CSA,MTX CSA± MTX CSA,MTX CSA/MTXCSA/MMF formatchedUBT

CSA, MTX,methylprednisolone

Medianfollow-up(mo) 60 38 72 61 7.7years 5years

EFS 82% 84% 91% 85% 85.6% DFS91%

OS 96% 94% 96% 96% 94.1% 91%

GraftRejection 10% 10% 7% 13% 8% 0%

TRM 7% 6% 6.9% 0% 4% 9%

aGVHD≥II 20% 15% 20% 10% 10%(grade¾) 17.5%(grade¾)

cGVHD 20% 12% 14% 22% 20% 5%

1Vermylen etal , BoneMarrowTran sp lan t.1 9 9 8 ;22 (1):1 -62WaltersWC etal . B lood .20 0 0;9 5(6 ):1 91 8 -2 43Bernaud in etal , B lood 2 00 7 ;1 10 :27 4 9-5 64P anep in to etal , B r JHaemato l 2 0 0 7;1 37 :47 9-8 55Dedeken etal , B r JHaemato lo gy 2 0 1 4 ;1 6 5 (3):40 2 -6Lu carel l i etal , BoneMarrowTran sp lan t2 0 1 4 ;49 :1 3 76 -81

MSD:matched sib l in gdono rMAC :myelo ab lativecond ition in g

2/11/16

8

HCTinPediatricSCD• Efficacy

§ Mostcenters usedMACregimens§ Childrentransplanted earlier incourseofSCDhadbetterEFS/OS

§ Inpatientswhoengrafted, resolutionofsicklecellphenotype observed

§ Ameliorationofpainfulvaso-occlusivecrises,ACS,hemolyticanemia, andtransfusiondependence

• Toxicity§ Rejection occurred in7-10%ofpatients§ Incidenceofseizures high(anticonvulsanttherapyinstituted)

K ingAetal . B lood2 01 4;1 23 (20 ):30 89 -94

ClinicalOutcomesofHCT

• Noepisodesofpain,strokeorACS• NoSCDCNScomplications• StabilizationofCNSdiseasebycerebral MRI• Variable reversal ofcerebral vasculopathy• Improvement ofosteonecrosisofhumeral head• Correction ofsplenicreticuloendothelialdysfunctionreported

Patients withstableengraftment experiencedresolutionofSCDcomplications:

Vermylen etal . BoneMarrowTran sp lan t.1 9 9 8 ;22 (1):1 -6WaltersWC etal . B lood .20 0 0;95 (6 ):1 91 8 -2 4 .

Longtermoutcomesinchildren

Neurologic

NostrokeeventsafterBMTinpatientswhohadexperiencedstrokebefore

Riskof seizureshighpresumablyduetoBUconditioningandlackof

anticonvulsantprophylaxisRisk↓withIVandtargeted

dosing

Pulmonary

Stableorimprovedatmedianfollowupof 3.2

years afterHCT

Of11patientswithRLDbaseline, 5improved/6

werepersistent

Of2patientswithobstructivechangesatbaseline, 1improved/1

worsened

Gonadal

Mostmaleshadhypogonadotropichypogonadism

Mostfemaleshadovarian

failure

Multicenter trial of 55children whohad successful engraftment afterMSD during the1990s

Walterset al . B io l B lood MarrowTran sp lan t20 1 0;1 6:26 3 -27 2

2/11/16

9

Nonmyeloablative (NMA)RegimensinChildren• Effort toreduce transplant-related toxicity• Iannone etal

§ n=7,medianage 9years§ Fludarabine andTBI200cGy§ 2patientsreceived horse ATG§ GVH prophylaxis:MMF+tacrolimusorCSA

• Results§ ANC<0.5x109 formedian5daysand<0.2x109 for0days§ 1patientgrade IIaGVHD, 6/7patientshaddonorchimerism

§ All6patientshadgraft failure,autologoushematopoieticrecovery, anddiseaserecurrence whenimmunosuppressiontaperedoff

Iannone R etal . B io lB lood MarrowTran sp lan t.20 03 ;9:5 19 -52 8

NMARegimensinChildren

• Increaseingraftfailure attributed topatients beingsensitized tominorhistocompatibility antigens frompriorblood transfusions and tobeingimmunocompetent

• DonorTcellengraftmentwasnotsufficient toestablish stable donorchimerism

• Note:ATGwasnotgiven toall patientsand ISwastaperedoffanytimeb/w~30 to200days

Iannone R etal . B io lB lood MarrowTran sp lan t.20 03 ;9:5 19 -52 8

AlloHCT inAdultSCD

• Fewadultswereinpediatrictrials§ ↓ Survival,↑ acute GVHD

• Contributing Factors:§ End-organ damage§ Transfusions =↑ Risk of graftrejection§ Increased age=↑ Riskfor GVHD

• MACregimensaretootoxicforadultSCDpatients

Vermylen etal , BoneMarrowTran sp lan t.1 9 9 8 ;22 (1):1 -6 .Bernaud in Fetal , B lood .2 00 7;1 10 (7):2 74 9-5 6.

2/11/16

10

Selectionofconditioningregimen

Days Days Days

Patient Graft Patient Graft Patient Graft

Myeloablative Reduced-Intensity Nonmyeloablative

WBC

(x1

09/L)

WBC

(x1

09/L)

0 .5 0.5 0.5

Gyu rko cza B etal . B lood 20 14 ;12 4(3 ):34 4-5 3.

MACexperienceinyoungadultSCD• Kuentz et alreport French experience in15patientsolder

than16years ofage whoreceived MSD, medianfollow-up3.4years

• Bu/CY/ATG andGVHprophylaxiswithMTX/CSA

Outcome n=15Complications Cerebralhemorrhage(n=1)

Seizures(n=1)Pericarditis(n=1)Hemorrhagiccystitis(n=1)Subduralhematoma(n=1)Prolongedthrombocytopenia(n=1)

≥ gradeIIaGVHD n=8ModeratecGVHD n=2DFS 93%Chimerismat1year Fulldonor(n=12)

Mixeddonor(n=2)

Kuen tz etal , B lood 2 01 1;1 18 :44 91 -44 92

MACinAdultSCD

• “STRIDE” study: n=17(MSD) andn=5(MUD), medianage 22years• Nograft failure orSCDrecurrence• 1deathduetointracranial hemorrhage (PRES)• 21/22patientswithstableengraftment (median 9.7months)• OSandEFS 95%;2patientswithgradeIaGVHD; 3patientscGVHD

DAY - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3

Fludarabine 30mg/m2/dayBusulfan (Bu)13.2mg/kg (total)

Tacrolimus orCyclosporineMethotrexate

K rishnamu rti L, etal . American So cietyo fHemato lo gy (ASH)2 0 1 5 ;Ab str 54 3.

- 2 - 1 0

Bu Bu Bu Bu

Flu FluFlu

Flu Flu

Thymoglobulin 6mg/kg

ATGATG ATG ATG

2/11/16

11

Reduced-IntensityConditioning(RIC)inAdultSCD

• 2adultpatientswithend-stage SCDwithHLA-identical siblings• Bothpatients engrafted; however, duetoGVHD complications

diedwithin1year

DAY -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

ATG 30mg/kg/dayFludarabine 30mg/m2/day

Melphalan140mg/m2

Stem CellInfusion

TacrolimusMethotrexate onDay 1,3, 6

van Besien etal . BoneMarrowTran sp lan t.2 0 0 0 ;2 6(4 ):4 45 -9 .

FLU FLU FLU FLUMELATG ATG ATG ATG

RICandMUDinAdultSCD

• SCURT trial: n=29; median age 14years; median f/u25.2months• Graft rejection before D+100(n=3, 10%)• 1-year EFS 76%; 1-year OS 86%• Grade II- IV and III- IV aGVHD atD+180 31%and 17%respectively• cGVHD at 1-year was 62%(extensive 38%)• 7deaths (6fromGVHD, 1fromgraft rejection after 2nd transplant)• PRES in 35%of patients; CMV and EBV in23%of patients

DAY - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3

Fludarabine 150mg/m2

Melphalan140mg/m2

TacrolimusorCyclosporineMethotrexate7.5mg/m2 D+1,3,6

Methylprednisolone1mg/kg/dD+7toD+28

Shenoy S,etal . American So ciety o fHemato lo gy (ASH)2 0 1 5 ;ab str 7 21 .

- 2 - 1 0

Flu Flu Flu Flu Flu Mel

Alemtuzumab(day-22to-19)

+1 to+28

NMAconditioning

KeyPrinciples

• Stablemixeddonorandrecipientchimerism

• ClassictransplantationregimensusedforhematologicmalignanciestootoxicforSCDadultpatientswhohaveaccumulatedorganfailuresandcomorbiditiesbeforetransplant

• LessTRMandlowratesofacuteandchronicGVHDandgraftfailure

2/11/16

12

MixedDonorChimerism

Kean LS,etal . B lood 2 0 03 ;10 2 :4 58 2 -4 5 93

Mixeddonorchimerism

• Use less intense preparative regimens§ Reduced-intensity (RIC)ornonmyeloablative (NMA)§ Completeeradication ofrecipientbonemarrow andGVLnotnecessary

• Red cell compartment replaced with donor red cells§ Donorerythrocytes (HbAA) have survival andmaturationadvantage over recipient erythrocytes (HBSS)

§ Resultsinmajorityofdonor-derived erythropoiesis§ ResolutionofsymptomaticSCDovertime

Bo lano s-Meade,etal . B lood Rev2 0 1 4;28 (6 ):2 43 -8

Alemtuzumabmechanismofaction

• Originally developed for prevention of GVHD andgraftrejection

• Recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody whichbinds toCD52 on the cell surface and triggerscelllysis§ CD8, CD4, NKcells, monocytes- depleted up to 1year

§ B-cells transiently depleted§ Used inconditioning regimens for invivoT celldepletion (replaces ATG)

Haleet al . BoneMarrowTran sp lan t.2 0 02 ;3 0(1 2):7 97 -80 4.Jaglowski et al . B lood .20 10 ;11 6(1 9):3 70 5-1 4.

2/11/16

13

Pharmacyconsiderations:Alemtuzumab

• Test dose: 0.03mg/kg IV onD-7; 0.1mg/kg IVD-6; 0.3mg/kg IVD-5 toD-3• Infuse IVPB over 2hours

DOSINGANDADMINISTRATION

• APAP650-1000mgPO, diphenhydramine 50mg PO, hydrocortisone 100mg IVPoncall, epinephrine 0.4 mg SC oncall, meperidine 25-50mgIVP oncall

PRE-MEDICATIONS

• Bloodpressure, heart rate, temperature ( infusionreaction)• CMV PCRforCMV reactivation

MONITORING

• Infusion reactions (fever, chills, hypotension, rigors, etc)• Infection(CMV, HSV,PJP)

ADVERSEREACTIONS

Campath ® P rescrib in g in fo rmation

Sirolimus• Discovered in1975inEasterIsland(RapaNuitonative

islanders)hence itsoriginalname

• Chemicalstructure: carbocycliclactone-lactam macrolideantibiotic

• Pharmacokinetics§ Highlylipophilicdrug,highlyboundtoredbloodcells§ Poorbioavailability(~15%)§ Extensive hepaticmetabolism(CYP3A4)§ Substrate forp-glycoprotein§ Longhalflife(~57-62hours)henceoncedailydosing

IngleGR ,etal . Ann P harmaco ther 2 0 0 0 ;34 (9):1 04 4-5 5

Pharmacyconsiderations:Sirolimus

• Loading: 5mg PO every 4hoursx3doses; Maintenance: 5mg PO daily

DOSINGANDADMINISTRATION

• Target trough8-12ng/dL

THERAPEUTICDRUGMONITORING

• CYP3A4inhibitors ( i.e., voriconazole, diltiazem) and inducers ( i.e, phenytoin,rifampin)

DRUG INTERACTIONS

• Cytopenia• Myalgias/arthralgias• Delayedwound healing• Interstitial pneumonitis• Stomatitis/aphthous-like oralulcers• Hypercholesterolemia/hypertriglyceridemia

ADVERSEREACTIONS

• Proteinuria• Peripheral edema• Hypertension• Acneiformrash

IngleGR ,etal . Ann P harmaco ther 2 0 0 0 ;34 (9):1 04 4-5 5

2/11/16

14

Sirolimusmechanismofaction(MOA)• MacrolideantibioticwhichformsacomplexwithFKBP-12thatbinds

toinhibitmammaliantargetofrapamycin (mTOR)• HaltsT-cellproliferationbyinhibitingprogressionfromG1 toSphase

IngleGR ,etal . Ann P harmaco ther 2 0 0 0 ;34 (9):1 04 4-5 5

Sirolimusandmixedchimerism• MixedchimerismMOA

§ SirolimusdoesnotblockT-cellactivation(signal1)butbindstomTOR blockingproliferation(signal2)1

§ Signal1inabsenceofsignal2rendersTcellanergy andpromotesT celltolerance

• Murinemousetransplantationmodels2§ Compared 30daycourseofCSAtosirolimus§ Long-term highlevelchimerismwasattained onlyinsirolimus-treated mice

§ Mixedlymphocyte reactions demonstrated tolerance todonorcells

1Powel l JDetal . J Immuno l 1 9 9 9;1 62 (5):22 7 5-2 78 42P owel l JDetal . Tran sp lan tation 2 0 05 ;80 (11 ):15 41 -15 45

Sirolimusstomatitis• ClinicalPresentation

§ Solitary ormultiplelesionswithrapidonsetafter initiation§ Ovoidshapew/centralgray area surrounded byerythematous halo

§ Canbepainfulanddebilitating

• Villa etalreportedcaseseries§ Mediantime toonset55daysafter allogeneic SCT§ 92.9%ulcersonnon-keratinizedmucosa(mostlyventrolateral tongue)

§ 13patientsreceived topicalsteroids§ Clinicalimprovementinallpatients§ Mediantime toresolutionwas14days

1Vi l la Aetal . B io lB loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5;2 1(3 ):50 3-8

2/11/16

15

NonmyeloablativeConditioninginAdultSCD

• 2adultpatientswithendstageSCDandHLA-identicalsiblings• 1- successfullyengraftedandSCDcomplicationfreeat27monthsout• 1- Rejectedgraft3monthsoutfromtransplant

DAY -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

ATG10mg/kg/day withtitration

200cGYofTBI

Stem CellInfusion

CyclosporineMycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

Ho ran etal . BoneMarrowTran sp lan t.2 0 05 ;3 5(2 ):17 1-7

Fludarabine 25mg/m2/day

-6

Hsiehetal.

Phase 1- 2ProspectiveTrial

Inclusion Criteria:• 16years or older• Hemoglobin SS orSC• HLA identical family member• Severe SCD

Hsieh etal . NEn gl JMed .2 0 09 ;3 61 (2 4):23 09 -17

Severe end-organcomplication-Previous CVA

-SCD nephropathy-Elevated tricuspid

regurgitation- jet velocity

Potential reversiblecomplication

-Frequent VOCcomplications

-ACS-Osteonecrosis

-Red-cellalloimmunization

Endpoints:Primary:- Stem cellengraftmentSecondary:- Avoidance ofGVHD- Adverse Events- Hemoglobin values- Hemolytic variables

88patients didnothavematched

donors

112patients

24patients

10patients Included

ConditioningRegimen

DAY -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

Alemtuzumab1mg/kg/total

300cGYTBI

Stem CellInfusion

Sirolimus

RESTDAY

Hsieh etal . NEn gl JMed .2 0 09 ;36 1(2 4):2 30 9-1 7

2/11/16

16

GraftOutcomes

• All10patientsalive,1graftrejection• Meanpercentageofdonormyeloidcellswas83.3%

Pt #Time sinceASCT

(months)Duration ofNeutropenia

(days)Duration ofLeucopenia

(months)Hgb(g/dl)

1 54 21 3.5 12

2 36 18 2.5 11.1

3 42 12 6 14.8

4 33 29 6 11.4

5 30 10 4 14.3

6 32 10 6 14.7

7 29 19 8 12.2

8 30 11 1.5 12.1

9 16 15 3.5 11.7

10 15 18 4 10.5

Median 30 15.5 4 12.65

Hsieh etal . NEn gl JMed .2 0 09 ;36 1(2 4):2 30 9-1 7

AdverseEvents

• AcuteorchronicGVHDdidnotoccurinanypatientEvent # of

patientsTimeafter

ASCTOutcome

CMVreactivation 1 14days Treatedwithfoscarnetand resolvedNarcotic withdrawal 3 Varying Hospital admittotapernarcotics

Abdominal Pain 2 3&12months Resolved

Transfusion-associated babesiosis 1 8months ResolvedExercise-related rhabdomyolosis 1 3 months Switched bactrimtopentamidineVentriculartachycardia 1 Previous to

ASCTRatecontrolled

Clostridium difficilecolitis 1 4months ResolvedCholelithiasis- induced acutepancreatitis

1 15months Resolved

Fever 1 1months Resolved

Hsieh etal . NEn gl JMed .2 0 09 ;36 1(2 4):2 30 9-1 7

Hsiehetal,2014• Study

• High riskSCDpatients• NMAregimen (extensionofpreviously reporteddata)

• Outcomes§ n=30§ 29patientssurvived median3.4years,noNRM§ 1patientdiedofintracranial bleedafter relapse§ 87%patientswithlong-term stable donorengraftment§ Mean donorTcelllevel48%andmyeloid86%§ NoaGVHD orcGVHD§ 15patientsdiscontinuedISTsuccessfully§ ↓ annualhospitalizationrate,↓mean weekly narcotic use

Hsieh etal , JAMA2 0 1 4;3 12 (1):4 8-5 6

2/11/16

17

Sirolimuscomplications

• 3patientsbeingtreatedforhyperlipidemia

Complication # ofpatients TimeafterASCT OutcomePneumonitis

Patient 3 1 16months Sirolimus switched tocyclosporine

Patient 9 1 4months Reduction ofgoal trough

Arthralgias

Patient 9 1 3months Reduction ofgoal trough andsupportive care

Patient 1 1 4months Reduction ofgoal trough andsupportive care

Hsieh etal . NEn gl JMed 2 0 0 9 ;36 1(2 4):2 30 9-1 7

NMAinadultSCD– UICexperience

DAY -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

Alemtuzumab1mg/kg/total

300cGYTBI

Stem CellInfusion

Sirolimus

RESTDAY

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

UICexperience• Conditioning regimen

§ Alemtuzumab/TBI300cGy§ GVHD prophylaxiswithSirolimus§ n=13,age 17-40§ Manypatients hadhighhematopoietic celltransplantation-specificcomorbidityindex(HCT-CI) ≥3

• Outcomes§ 11patientshadsevereneutropenia(ANC<500)formediandurationof6days

§ Medianhospitalization33days§ 1patienthadsecondarygraftfailure(noncompliantwithIST)§ NocasesofaGVHDorcGVHD§ At1year,12/13patientsmaintainedstabledonorchimerism§ 1patienthadsirolimus pulmonarytoxicity§ 4/13patientsdevelopedinfection;3/13hadCMVreactivation

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

2/11/16

18

Transientneutropenia

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1 8 15 22 29

Neu

trop

hil C

ount

(x

109 /L

)

Day Post-Transplant

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

Hemoglobinconcentration

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Pre-HSCT 3 6 9 12

Hemoglobin

(g/dL)

Months Post-HSCT

Female

Male

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

Sirolimusandchimerism

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

2/11/16

19

Hemoglobinfractionation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pre-transplant Day+30 Day+60 Day+90 Day+180 1 Year

Hem

oglo

bin

A (%

)

Hb AA Donor

Hb AS Donor

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

PatientQualityofLife(SF-36score)

30.1 31

36.8 37

42.137.6

48.245.5

GENERALHEALTH BODILYPAIN

NormBasedSF-36Score

Pre-HSCT Day+30 Day+90 1Year

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

HCT–specificComorbidityIndex(HCT-CI)HCT-CIscore

• TooldevelopedbySeattleFredHutchinsonCancerResearchCentertocaptureinformationon17differentorgan-specificco-morbidities

• HCT-CI>8associatedwith30%NRM

UICexperience• HCT-CIassessedbaselineinallpatientsatUIC

• AdultSCDpatientshavemanyco-morbiditiesandthisshowsthatthisregimensafeandeffectiveinpatientswithhighHCT-CI

Sorro r etal , B lood 2 00 5;1 06 :29 12 -2 91 9Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t 2 01 5 .p ii :S1 08 3-8 79 1

HCT-CIscoreof UICcohort*Figure courtesyof Damiano Rondelli

andPritesh Patel

LowHCT-CI (n=2)Intermediate HCT-CI (n=1)High HCT-CI (n=10)

2/11/16

20

UICexperience• NMAregimenofalemtuzumab and low-doseTBI

§ Normalizeshemoglobinin92%ofpatientswithclinicallyaggressive SCD

§ ReducesSCD-related complications§ Improvescardiopulmonary function§ Improvesqualityoflife

• Sirolimus trough levels§ Lower trough levelsofsirolimus resultedinchimerismlevelsequivalent tothose observed withhigherlevels

§ Lesstoxicity(arthralgias, mucositis,pneumonitis)

• ABO incompatibility§ 2patientswere ABOmismatchedandsuccessfullyengrafted (firstreported)

ALTERNATIVEDONORTRANSPLANTATIONUMBILICALCORD

HLA-HAPLOIDENTICAL

Umbilicalcordbloodtransplant(UCBT)• CBisanalternativesourceofhematopoietic

stemcellsforpatientswithmalignantandnonmalignantdiseases

• HLA-identicalsiblingUCBT§ ↓ aGVHD and cGVHD§ Graft failure in10% of patients1

§ Not studied inadults

• UnrelatedUCBTmuchlesssatisfactory2§ High rateof primary graftfailure and TRM§ DFSonly 50%2

1Locatel l i etal . B lood2 0 1 3 ;12 2 (6):1 07 2 -782Ruggeri etal . B io l B lood MarrowTran sp lan t2 0 1 1 ;17 (9 ):1 3 75 -1 38 2

2/11/16

21

BMversuscordinpediatricSCDLocatellietal(n=389)

Locatellietal(n=96)

Stemcellsource BM HLA-siblingCBTConditioningregimen Bu/CY/Flu,or

Bu/Flu/TT±ATGBu/CY,Bu/CY/Flu,Bu/Flu/TT,Bu/Flu,orBu/CY/TT±ATG

GVHDprophylaxis CSA±MTX(76%) CSA ± MTX(30%)

Medianfollow-up(mo)

72 72

EFS 88% 83%OS 95% 97%GraftFailure n=29 (7.4%) n=10(10.4%)TRM n=18 n=3aGVHD ≥II 21% 10%cGVHD 42/355(12%) 6/84(7%)

• Eurocord and EBMT1

• Median f/u70months• Median age 8.1years (BMT) and

5.9(UCBT)• Thalassemia major orSCD• CBT versus BM

• Slower neutrophil recovery(19versus 23days)

• Less aGVHD• No extensive cGVHD• No dif ference inOS (p=0.92)• DFS 92%(BM)and90%(CB)• 21patients died of

transplant-related causes (18BMT and 3CB)

• Related UCBT suitable option forpatients

Lo catel l i etal . B lood 2 0 13 ;12 2(6 ):10 72 -78

RICandUCBTinPediatricAdultSCD

• SCURT trial: n=8; median age 13.7years, median follow-upof 1.8years• Neutrophil recovery @median of 22days; 6of 8patients had platelet recovery

(>50,000/mm3)by day 100• 3patients whoengrafted had 100%donorcells byday 100,5had autologous recovery• 2patients had grade II aGVHD, 1chronicextensive cGVHD (died of respiratory failure)• Conclusion: high incidence of graftfailure; SCURT cordblood arm suspended

DAY - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 3

Fludarabine 150mg/m2

Melphalan140mg/m2

TacrolimusorCyclosporineMMF

B io l B lood MarrowTran sp lan t20 12 ;18 :12 65 -12 7 2

- 2 - 1 0

Flu Flu Flu Flu Flu Mel

Alemtuzumab(startingD-21)

+1 to+28

HaploidenticalSCT• Rationale

§ HLA-identical matched donors difficult tofind§ MAC prohibited inmost adult patients§ GVTeffect not necessary in non-malignantdiseases

• Post-transplantcyclophosphamide (PT-CY)§ Targets proliferating, allo-reactive Tcells§ Spares hematopoietic stem cells because of highlevelsof aldehyde dehydrogenase

§ Similar GVHDrisk and immune reconstitutioncompared toMSD

Bolano s-Meade.B lood 20 12 ;20 :42 85 -4 29 1

2/11/16

22

HLA-haploidenticalSCTinadults

• NMA regimen using Flu/CY/ATG andGVHD prophylaxis withCY andFK /MMF orsirolimus/MMF

• Median followup of 711days, median age 30years• n=14(HLA-haploidentical) and n=3 (HLA-matched sibling donors)• 11patients engrafted; median time toneutrophil and platelet recovery was 24days• 10patients asymptomatic and 6patients off IS• 1patient developed aGVHD (skin, resolved withouttreatment)• No deaths reported

DAY - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 - 4

Flu 150mg/m2

CY14.5mg/kgD-6andD-5TBI2GyD-1

- 3 - 2 -1

RabbitATG0.5mg/kgonD-9and2mg/kgonD-8

andD-7

0 +1 +2 +3 +4

ATG ATG ATGFLU FLU FLU FLU FLU FLUCY CY TBI

CY CY

CY50mg/kg/dD+3andD+4FK/sirolimus (1year) andMMF(D+35)

Bo lano s-Meade.B lood 20 12 ;20 :42 85 -4 29 1

Conclusions• SCD patients need tobe completely immunoablated

§ Immunocompetent patients§ Alloimmunization

• Encouraging data in pediatrics usingMAC regimens§ Bu/Cy/ATG§ Longtermcomplications(gonadal,neurologic)

• MAC regimens have not been successful in adults§ HighTRMinadultswhohavemoreadvancedSCD§ NMAregimenssafeandeffectiveinadults§ SmalllevelchimerismamelioratesSCDsymptoms§ Alternativetransplantsbeingexplored(haplo-HCT,UBCT)

OverallSurvivalbyDonorSource

The3-yearOS~90%regardless of thesourceofHSCsGlu ckman E.ASHedu cation book2 0 13 ;37 0 -3 7 6

2/11/16

23

Supportivecaresconsiderations

• RBCexchange priortoHCT• Goal HBS < 30%

ALLOSENSITIZATION

• Penicillin VK• Acyclovir• Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim orpentamidine forPJPprophylaxis• Fluconazole

INFECTIONPROPHYLAXIS

• Maintain platelet count>50Kand Hemoglobin >9• Avoid use of growthfactoras it has showntoexacerbate SCD crises

PRECAUTIONS/CONTRAINDICATIONS

• These patients are opioid dependent and pain symptoms take time toresolveafter HCT

PAINMANAGEMENT

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

ConclusionGrowing adultSCDpopulation:

↑ morbidity andmortality↑ hospitalizations andhealthcarecosts

Limited treatments for refractoryseveredisease

Addition ofalemtuzumab andsirolimus toAlloHCT processachievesmixedchimerism anddemonstrates asafeandeffectiveoption forAdultSCDwith severedisease

AlloHCT proven successful ineliminating symptomsandcomplications forpediatric SCDpatients, tootoxicforadults SCDpatients

Saraf etal . B io l B loodMarrowTran sp lan t.2 01 5 .p ii : S10 8 3-8 79 1

ARSQuestion#1

Myeloablativeconditioningregimensarepreferredforadultpatientsovernon-myeloablativeconditioningregimensduetodecreasetransplantrelatedmortalityandincreasechimerism.A. TrueB. False

2/11/16

24

Case1

PTisa21year-oldfemalewithSCDandisbeingconsideredforHCT.Shehasbeenadmittedseveraltimesforpaincrisisandacutechestsyndrome.Shehasosteonecrosisinherrightkneeandhadastroke1yearago.Sheisonchronicpartialexchangetransfusions.

ARSQuestion#2• Basedonthispatient’s PMH,whatisthe

indication forHCT?A. Multiple pain crisisB. History of strokeC. Osteonecrosis of 1jointD. None of theabove. Thispatient does not have

an indication for HCT

ARSQuestion#3

Themostappropriateconditioning regimenforheris?A. Bu16mg/kg,TBI800cGyB. Bu14mg/kg,FLU180mg/m2,ATGC. Bu12mg/kg,CY200mg/kg,alemtuzumabD. BU6.4mg/kg,FLU180mg/m

2

2/11/16

25

ARSQuestion#4MAisa5year-oldmalewithSCD.HehasanHLA-identicalsibling.HisPMHissignificantfor2episodesofACS,4episodesofvaso-occlusivecrises,andrecurrent priapism.BecauseofhisPMH,heisbeingconsideredforHCT.

ARSQuestion#4Whatisthemostappropriateconditioningregimenforthispatient?

A. Bu 16mg/kg, CY 200mg/kgB. TBI 200 cGy, FLU 24mg/m2, Cy500mg/m2

C. BU 6.4mg/kg IV, FLU180mg/m2

D. TBI 200 cGy, FLU 150mg/m2

KarenSweiss, PharmD,BCOPClinical Assistant Professor

Clinical Pharmacist inHematologyandStemCell TransplantDepartmentofPharmacyPractice

Universityof I llinois College ofPharmacyChicago, IL

HEMATOPOIETICSTEMCELLTRANSPLANTFORSICKLECELLDISEASE:PERSPECTIVESFROM

CHILDHOODTOADULTHOOD