henrik nilsson, university of gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 ›...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NGS and molecular identification of fungi
Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburg
![Page 2: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
High proportion of incorrectly identified fungi
Correct identification: Archaeorhizomycetes
![Page 4: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
No name – no communication
![Page 5: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The UNITE database (http://unite.ut.ee) • All fungal ITS sequences in GenBank
• …clustered to ~species level (95%-100% similarity in 0.5% steps) – species hypotheses
• …unique names of all such species hypotheses:
Archaeorhizomyces|AY394904|SH197124.06FU
Or in short: SH197124.06FU
![Page 6: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
http://unite.ut.ee/sh/SH197124.06FU
![Page 7: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• …named as far as possible (phylum, class, order…)
• …with ecological/geographical metadata
• …with substandard sequences pruned
…web-based, third-party sequence annotation style!
![Page 8: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• …and circumscribed as well as possible Some SHs are best circumscribed at 97%: Many others require tighter clustering, here 98.5% and 99%:
Others require 99.5% or 100%: Some species have mutually fully conserved ITS regions:
![Page 9: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
% SHs Singleton SHs
97 17 432 22 157
97.5 18 536 24 796
98 19 558 27 915
98.5 20 885 32 618
99 22 396 40 973
99.5 26 397 63 881
Dynamic 4 403 RefS 16 783 RepS
46%$
45%$
1%$3%$
0%$ 0%$
3%$ 2%$
Ascomycota$
Basidiomycota$
Chytridiomycota$
Glomeromycota$
Incertae$sedis$
Neocallimas>gomycota$
Uniden>fied$
Zygomycota$
At a default of 98.5% similarity: 20,885 non-singleton SHs 32,618 singleton SHs
Latest version: <1% of SH unassigned at phylum level
![Page 10: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
http://unite.ut.ee/repository.php
NGS pipelines Various other databases and resources Standalone BLAST files
![Page 11: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Original names Largely uninformative or misleading
![Page 13: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
But improvement is easy …and must be easy
![Page 14: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Taxonomic re-annotation powered by Index Fungorum
![Page 15: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
~40% of all public ITS sequences are annotated with country of collection.
<25% of all public ITS sequences are
annotated with a host.
![Page 16: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Addition of geo/ecological metadata easy, standards-compliant
(ISO / Darwin Core)
![Page 17: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
If specimen/culture data are not provided with the INSDC entry, they can be associated with sequences through a single click. Sequences from type material are particularly useful.
![Page 18: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Annotation efforts
Various Dikarya
Mycorrhizal fungi
![Page 20: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
31,954 changes implemented
• 5,135 taxonomic re-annotations • 25,028 additions of geographical/host data • 1,368 specifications of reference sequences (~1,000 types) • 401 broken sequences removed
Plant pathogenic
fungi
![Page 21: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Chimeras ( 1,000 removed )
![Page 22: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• 29,956 taxonomic re-annotations
• 50,442 specifications of country of collection
• 52,801 specifications of host
• 2,553 chimeric sequences found
• 7,105 low read quality sequences found
• 4,948 specifications of reference sequences
• 12,142 sequences connected to specimens/cultures
![Page 23: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Why do I get “Unidentified fungus”? • Reference sequences poorly annotated (“fixed”,
now less than 1% “Unidentified fungus”)
• Type material not sequenced
• NGS-bases studies recover fungi that Sanger-based studies don’t – not so easy to “fix”
![Page 24: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
15,79$
29,84$
0,12$ 0,06$ 0,35$
34,24$
19,61$
31,49$
21,45$
0$ 0$ 0$
9$
38,06$
69,05$
15,73$
0$ 0,95$ 0,56$ 0,22$
13,59$
0$
10$
20$
30$
40$
50$
60$
70$
80$
UNITE - new developments Implementing Next Generation Sequences (NGS) into Sanger-based species hypotheses
3 NGS datasets:
Papua New Guinea 2 448 RepS
Colombia 454 RepS
Estonia 2 730 RepS
![Page 25: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists to go through “their” fungi in UNITE
- Correct bad/missing names - Designate reference sequences for SHs - Add metadata on, e.g., country of collection - Remove broken sequences
• Sequences from type/authentic material
• Report nomenclatural issues to Index Fungorum or MycoBank
• …annotation effort for indoor fungi?
![Page 27: Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburgmicrobe.net › wp-content › uploads › 2014 › 09 › SF_RHN.pdf · Improving identification success of indoor fungi • Relevant taxonomists](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022060406/5f0f5bbc7e708231d443c37f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)