hermes microtech inc.: a new mba case and teaching module on entrepreneurial leadership and systems...
TRANSCRIPT
Hermes Microtech Inc.:A New MBA Case and Teaching Module on Entrepreneurial Leadership and Systems
Innovation in “Greening” Buildingsfrom Darden Business School
Chris Lotspeich
Second Hill Group
WRI BELL Conference
18–19 July 2003
Fort Lauderdale, FL
2
Batten Fellowship
• The Batten Institute at Darden at UVA
• Chris a visiting Batten Fellow 2002–2003
• Sponsor Prof. Andrea Larson
• MBA module based on consulting experience
Second Hill Group
3
MBA Teaching Module
• Article on systems innovation theory
• Fictional case on implementation challenges– Champion greening company facilities– Change strategies & organizational dynamics
• Two technical notes– Whole-systems design & management– LEED green building rating system
Second Hill Group
4
Topical Overview
• Systems innovation and entrepreneurship
• Greening facilities can improve companies
• Green building strategies
• Overcoming obstacles to implementation
Second Hill Group
5
Systems Innovation Article
• System dynamics of economy & environment
• Small factors cause big system changes
• Economic activity degrades ecosystems
• Transition to sustainable system condition
Second Hill Group
6
Entrepreneurship and Innovation
• Schumpeterian creative destruction
• Entrepreneurs have new vision of the future
• Harness resources to realize their vision
• Innovate new methods, products, processes
Second Hill Group
7
Systems Innovation
• Organizational systems produce technical systems– Design-build process makes buildings
• Entrepreneur innovates systemic change
• Coordinates incremental changes at leverage points
• Creates big changes in both system & outcome
• Organizational learning via product improvement
Second Hill Group
8
Greening Facilities: A Good First Step
• Every business uses buildings, pays overhead costs
• The design-build-operate process is wasteful
• Proven improvements are well understood
• Learning integrates many functions and disciplines
• Early wins free resources, build buy-in
Second Hill Group
9
Green Building Benefits
• Healthier indoor & outdoor environments
• Cost reductions
– Capital costs can be same or lower
– Operating cost reductions typically ~50%
• Potential labor productivity increases
• Promotes innovation
Second Hill Group
10
LEED Rating System Tech Note
• Voluntary standard of US Green Building Council– Industry-wide stakeholder association
– Power to transform market
• Defines “green” based on accepted best practices
• Flexible menu of opportunities– Promotes innovation, economy
• Credible third-party certification
Second Hill Group
11
Resource Efficiency Strategies
• Integrated, whole-systems design– Big savings can cost less than small ones
• Appropriate technology– Low-impact materials and energy use
• Management Techniques – Money, information, organizational behavior
Second Hill Group
12
End-Use, Least-Cost Analysis
• Historical supply-side focus: How to get more resources?
• But users want end-use services, not resources– Hot showers, cold beer, light, comfort, torque…– … not oil , electricity, wood, etc.
• Demand-side focus: what is the least expensive, least polluting way to deliver those services?
Second Hill Group
13
Whole-Systems Design Approach
• Life-Cycle Analysis (LCA), total cost of ownership
• Consider interactions and synergies
• Compounding leverage of downstream savings
• “Charrette” stakeholder group design process
Second Hill Group
14
The Leverage of Downstream Savings
Second Hill Group
15
Building The Business Case• Use total cost of ownership
– Capital and operating costs– Credit savings from reduced infrastructure
• Turn cost centers into profit centers– Cost reductions add directly to bottom line– Less risk, more return than earning on sales margin
• Investment criteria: Payback vs. ROI
Second Hill Group
16
Payback vs. Return On Investment
• Payback period calculation is the inverse of ROI
• Capital asset ROI criteria based on marginal cost of capital– 15% COC = ~7 year payback
• Most retrofit investments capped at 2-year payback period– 2-year payback = 50% annual ROI
• Bias vs energy efficiency, not a level playing field
• Asking efficiency to pay >3 more than COC hurts profits
Second Hill Group
17
Prioritization by Simple Payback
Second Hill Group
Source: EPA Energy Star® Small Business Guide
18
Common Obstacles to Efficiency
• Disincentives, split incentives and perverse incentives
• Lack of information
• Capital misallocation
• Organizational behavior
Second Hill Group
19
Differing Incentives in Building (I)
• Consider the owner, architect, builder, and tenant
• Owner: May not know about efficient methods– If he doesn’t ask for efficiency, he won’t get it
• Architect: Not trained in resource-efficient techniques, and not asked to prioritize them– No incentive to work harder and argue for efficiency– Traditionally, architects and engineers are compensated
for what they spend, not what they save
Second Hill Group
20
Differing Incentives in Building (II)
• Contractor: Wants maximum profit from his bid
- He’s rewarded for the lowest bid, and won’t pay the bills
- Incentive to install cheap (and inefficient) equipment
- Electric heaters, inefficient fridge, incandescent bulbs...
Tenant: Had no say, and is stuck with the bills
Second Hill Group
21
Improving Building Efficiency
• Increase awareness of efficient techniques
• Specify building performance, efficiency
• Performance-based fees – Reward the architect for what she saves
• Integrated design workshop, or “charrette”– All involved meet with experts to optimize the design
• Share savings with building energy managers
Second Hill Group
22
Hermes Microtech Case Study• CEO and VP of EHS want green building
• Young manager tasked with implementation
• Has CEO support, but not full authority over project
• Consider lessons of prior efforts, consultant input
• Assess goals & incentives of process participants
• What should be her strategy for new project?
Second Hill Group
23
Hermes Dramatis Personae• CEO• VP of Production
Department• VP of Environment and
Facilities Department• Special Assistant to VP
of Environment & Facilities (protagonist)
• Comptroller
• Construction Manager from Production Dep’t
• Product Engineer from Facilities Division
• Site Facilities Director• Architect vendor• Construction vendor• Green building NGO
consultant• Green engineering
consultant
Second Hill Group
24
Hermes Organizational Chart
Second Hill Group
Regina ShinelleProject Manager
Susan LegumeComptroller
OperationsDivision
Chip SmithExec VP
Production Department
Heather GlenSpecial Assistant to EVP
for Environmentand Facilities
Tom DowitProject Chief Engineer
Steve SparksFacilities Director
FacilitiesDivision
EnvironmentDivision
Sandy StrandExec VP
Environment and FacilitiesDepartment
Alden TorusCEO
25
• The Batten Institute and the Darden School
(www.darden.virginia.edu/batten)• Rocky Mountain Institute (www.rmi.org)• Contact the author:
Chris LotspeichPrincipal, Second Hill Group
37 Majus Dr, Coventry, CT 06238 USATel: + 1.970.948.3280
E-mail: [email protected]
Second Hill Group
For More Information
26
Second Hill Group
Payback vs ROI Appendix
27
Return on Investment (ROI)• Many capital investments assessed in terms of ROI
• Department of Energy method:
– CA = Annual energy cost after implementation
– CB = Annual energy cost before implementation
– CI = Cost of implementation
• Annual return on investment (ROI)*, expressed as a percentage:
CB – CA CI (*This approach ignores certain tax effects and depreciation)
Second Hill Group
28
Simple Payback• Payback period calculation is the inverse of ROI, where:
– CA = Annual energy cost after implementation
– CB = Annual energy cost before implementation
– CI = Cost of implementation
• Simple payback*, expressed as the number of years needed to recover costs:
CI__ CB – CA
(*This approach ignores certain tax effects and depreciation)
Second Hill Group