heses and the hefce web facility sroc 08 april 2009 presented by christine daniel, analytical...
TRANSCRIPT
HESES and the HEFCE web facility
SROC
08 April 2009
Presented by Christine Daniel, Analytical Services Group, HEFCE
Outline of presentation
Part 1 – WP and TESS
• Widening participation (WP)/teaching enhancement and student success (TESS) allocations for 2009-10
Part 2 – HESA derived statistics
• The web facility• The derived statistics
exercise
Part 1
WP and Tess
What is WP funding for?
• Recognises the additional costs of recruiting and retaining students from disadvantaged or non-traditional backgrounds
• Institutional funding, not student support
How much funding is allocated?
• Total 2009-10 allocations: £143m, of which £2m set aside for July allocation
• Two streams of the WP allocation:
– Funding for widening access (£61m FT; £66m PT)
– Funding for disabled students (£13m)
Widening Access Allocation
• New UG entrants are assigned to census wards using postcode
• Wards assigned to quintiles according to:– FT UG under 21: young HE participation– PT and mature FT: average educational
achievement
• Students weighted according to quintile of their ward
• Institution average weight calculated for FT and PT students and used to calculate allocation
WA population
• FT or PT HEFCE-funded UK-domiciled undergraduate (including FD) entrants
• This information taken from HESES07 re-creation and only counts students eligible to be counted in Column 4 of the re-creation
• ELQs are not counted in population
Key HESA fields used in WA allocation
• POSTCODE
• QUALENT2
• COURSEAIM
WP for disabled students allocation
• Calculate proportion of students in receipt of Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA)
• Proportions across sector ranked and split into quartiles
• Institution assigned to a quartile and then weighted according to this quartile
• Weight is used in calculating allocation
• Allocation is subject to a minimum value
Disabled students allocation population
• HEFCE-funded, independently funded or non-fundable UK-domiciled students who would be eligible to receive the DSA (if they were disabled)
• This information taken from HESES07 re-creation and only counts students eligible to be counted in Column 4 of the re-creation
Key HESA fields used in disabled students allocation
• DISALL = 4 indicates a student is in receipt of the DSA
What is TESS funding for?
• To support the enhancement of learning and teaching
• Improving retention of students who are at risk of not continuing their studies
• To contribute to the success of students
• Institutional funding, not student support
How much funding is allocated?
• Total 2009-10 allocations: £269m, of which £3m set aside for July allocation
• Three streams of the TESS allocation:– Improving retention (£171m FT; £54m PT)– Institutional learning and teaching strategies (£31m)– Research informed teaching (£10m)
FT Improving Retention allocation
• FT UG new entrants assigned to risk categories based on age and entry qualifications
• Students weighted according to their risk category
• Institution average weight calculated for FT students and used to calculate allocation
FT IR population
• FT and SWOUT HEFCE-fundable UK-domiciled undergraduate (including FD) entrants
• This information taken from HESES07 re-creation and only counts students eligible to be counted in Column 4 of the re-creation
• ELQs are not counted in population
Key HESA fields used in FT improving retention allocation
• QUALENT2
• The ‘qualifications on entry’ entity (we use QUALTYPE, QUALSBJ and QUALGRADE)
• UCASPERID and UCASAPPID
Timetable for 2009-10 WP/TESS allocations
• September 2008: 2007-08 HESA web facility released
• March 2009: initial 2009-10 WP/TESS allocation
• March 2009: 2007-08 HESA derived statistics exercise launched
• May 2009: deadline for receipt of amendments to 2007-08 HESA data for inclusion in July allocation
Timetable for 2009-10 WP/TESS allocations
• July 2009: revised 2009-10 WP/TESS allocations
• Summer 2009: 2008-09 HESA web facility released
• Winter 2009-10: 2008-09 HESA derived statistics exercise launched
Useful reading
How we fund WP
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/widen/fund/
How we fund TESS
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/funding/support/
‘2007-08 statistics derived from HESA data: Guide to HEFCE web facility ’ (HEFCE 2008/30) - Annex E and Appendix 7
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2008/08_30/
‘Funding higher education in England’ (HEFCE 2008/33)
http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2008/08_33/
Part 2
HESA derived statisticsHESA derived statistics
HESA derived statistics
• What are the derived statistics?• How will we use HESA data to monitor funding?• Timetable• What is the web facility?• What is the derived statistics exercise?
• How do I find out more?
What are the derived statistics?
• Monitor funding allocations
• Inform Widening Participation (WP) allocations
• Inform flexible study measure
• Research Degree Qualification Rates (RDQRs)
• Transparent Approach to Costing TRAC(T) student FTEs
• Data for audit purposes
• LLN student summaries
• Non-completion toolkit
How do we monitor teaching funding with HESA data?
• Generate HESES re-creation using HESA data
• Generate HESES re-creation based on cost centre sector norms for subjects
• Select institutions to explain differences between HESES and HESES re-creation
• HESES re-creation supersedes HESES for funding purposes
HESES re-creation output (1)
• Each HEI provided with:
– HESES re-creation tables 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4 and 6
– HESES re-creation grant adjustment report, standard resource and assumed fees
– WP allocation report based on HESES re-creation assumed FTEs
HESES re-creation output (2)
• HESA-HESES comparison summary tables
• Equivalent HESES tables
• Individualised data for each HESA record
• Includes all derived fields used to re-create HESES
Teaching funding monitoring timetable
• December 2007 - HESES07 deadline
• October 2008 – Final deadline for 2007-08 HESA data
• November 2008 - HEFCE receive 2007-08 HESA data
• December 2008 - HESES08 deadline
• March 2009 – Selection notification (HESES07 and 2007-08 HESA)
• May 2009 - Deadline for initial response
• June 2009 – Deadline for amending 2007-08 HESA data (as part of this exercise)
• September 2009 – Interim grant adjustments (if exercise not complete)*
• October 2009 - Final deadline for 2008-09 HESA data
• November 2009 - HEFCE receive 2008-09 HESA data
* different for HESES re-creation based on cost centre sector norms
HESA derived statistics web facility (1)
• Available in summer each year
• Unlimited use/useable for entire year
• Submit HESA data to HEFCE extranet (secure)
• Obtain outputs listed earlier as aggregated Excel output and associated individualised file
HESA derived statistics web facility (2)
• Comprehensive guide on using web facility
• Full description of algorithms
• Trouble-shooting guidance
• Detail of ‘problems of fit’
• ‘Pseudo code’
• Support through ‘helpline’ and e-mail
Flexible study measure - background
• Often referred to as ‘partial completion’
• ‘Review of the teaching funding method: Second consultation on changes to the method’ HEFCE 2007/02
• HEIs confidence to allow students to change their pace of study
What are ‘partial completions’?
• Completed activity is less than student’s initial study intentions for the year
• Completed modules only
• HESES definitions for ‘completed module’
Overview of methodology
• 2007-08 and 2006-07 HESA data
• Calculate flexible study measure weighting
• Based on standard resource and assumed fees for partially completing students
• Applied to contract range
• Migration funding (initially)
Further detail of methodology (1)
• HESES07 re-creation
• Plus students in HESES population that did not generate a countable year in HESES07
• Identify partial completions and assign funding characteristics (price group, fee level etc.)
• Calculate standard resource for partial completions (modules completed)
Further detail of methodology (2)
• Calculate assumed resource for partial completions (modules attempted)
• Calculate weighting to reflect where HEIs would move relative to the tolerance band if ‘partial completions’ had been included in the teaching funding model for 2007-08
What are ‘partial completions’?
• HESES population (HESEXCL=0, 512 etc.)
• Non-completions (HESCOMP=3)• Completed modules (MODOUT = 1, 2)• Module ‘countable’ in HESES07
(MODSTAT = 1, 2, 4)• Student’s completed ‘module FTE’ >
0.167 (normally 20 credits)
And attempted modules?
• Non-completed modules (MODOUT = 1, 2, 4, 6, 7)
• Attempted modules ‘countable’ in HESES07 (MODSTAT = 1, 2, 4, 5)
Further information about the flexible study measure
• Forthcoming 2007-08 HESA derived statistics publication
• 2009-10 Grant letter: technical guidance, paragraphs 174-188
Web facility demo
HESA-HESES exercise
• HESA-HESES07 comparison – twelfth year HESA used to monitor funding
• HESES re-created for all HEIs
• All HEIs are tested against the ‘selection criteria’
• Similar exercise is conducted for FE Colleges using ILR data
HESA-HESES – response criteria
• HESA-HESES06
– £500,000 difference in contract range holdback
– £500,000 net difference in funding conditional upon delivery of growth
– £100,000 medical and dental contract FTE
– WP criterion (based on HESES06 re-creation FTEs)
– Model 2 LLN criterion
• HESA-HESES07
– ?
– Table 7 criterion
HESA-HESES – no response required
No response required
– does not mean that HESA and HESES data are consistent
– discrepancies may impact WP funding allocations
– does not exempt HEI from subsequent data
audit/ retrospective funding adjustments
HESA-HESES – response required (1)
• Submit Action and Implementation Plan
• Action Plan to remove discrepancies between HESA-HESES
• Implementation Plan to ensure that similar errors do not recur in the future
HESA-HESES – response required (2)
• Action Plan should address all of the following (where relevant):
– Errors in HESES
– Errors in HESA
– Problems of fit with the HEFCE algorithms
Errors in HESES
• HESES re-creation will only be ‘signed-off’ once we are
satisfied that it ‘reasonably represents the outturn
position for the year’
• HESES re-creation will supersede HESES
• Retrospective adjustment to funding will be made
Errors in HESA
• Corrections to HESA data
• Administrative fee will be charged by HESA (20% of annual subscription)
• Revised HESA compared to HESES to ensure
discrepancies are fully explained
Problems of fit with HEFCE algorithms (1)
Known algorithmic approximations:
– INSTAPP
– Part-time FTE (some non-standard years)
– Assignments to price groups (as above)
Problems of fit with HEFCE algorithms (2)
• Unlikely to be sole cause for discrepancies
• Evidence may be requested (e.g. HE prospectus)
• Provide necessary data to correct assumptions and reconcile the two data sources
Who to contact and useful reading
Contact: Ewa Wawrzynska at [email protected] or
[email protected] 931 7353
Further reading:
HEFCE 2008/07 on 2006-07 reconciliation
HEFCE 2008/30 on 2007-08 web facility
HEFCE 2009/?? on 2007-08 reconciliation