hf basic

Upload: shamit-rathi

Post on 02-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    1/26

    1

    PETE 629 ADVANCED

    HYDRAULIC FRACTURING Dr. Peter P. Valk

    professorTexas A&M University

    RICH 709 [email protected]

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    2/26

    2

    Source:Reservoir

    Stimulation

    3 rd Ed.

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    3/26

    3

    Well or Reservoir Stimulation? Near wellbore region and/or bulk reservoir? Acceleration versus increasing reserve?

    Explosives

    Huff and puff stimulation (steam, CO 2, electric) Acidizing Acid fracturing Propped fracturing Water frac

    Coupling of goals Frac&pack

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    4/26

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    5/26

    5

    Principle of least resistance

    Horizontal fracture Vertical fracture

    Least Principal Stress Least Principal Stress

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    6/26

    6

    h

    R f

    w

    An Early Paradigm

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    7/26

    7

    Vertical Fracture - Vertical well Bypass damage

    Original skin disappears Change streamlines

    Radial flow disappears

    Wellbore radius is not a

    factor any more Increased PI can be utilized

    p or q

    p J q post D

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    8/26

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    9/26

    9

    Transverse Vertical Fractures - HorizontalWell

    H,max

    Hydraulic Fracture

    H,max

    D

    x f

    H,min

    Radial

    convergingflow in frac

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    10/26

    10

    Fracture Morphology(source: Petroleum Well Construction)

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    11/26

    11

    Fracture Propagation Elasticity Fluid Friction Material balance Fracture Mechanics

    (Propagation)

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    12/26

    12

    Goals first

    Which wellbore-fracture orientation isfavorable? Which can be done? How large should the treatment be? What part of the proppant will reach the

    pay? Width and length (optimum dimensions)? How can it be realized?

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    13/26

    13

    Materials and Equipment

    Fracturing fluids Proppants Equipment

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    14/26

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    15/26

    15

    Fluid type

    Oil-based (phasing out) Water based (polimer)

    Linear Cross linked

    Containing Nitrogen or Carbon dioxidegas

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    16/26

    16

    Crosslinked fluid systemsCrosslinker Gelling Agent pH range Temperature range oF

    B, non-delayed guar, HPG 8-12 70-300

    B, delayed guar, HPG 8-12 70-300

    Zr, delayed guar 7-10 150-300

    Zr, delayed guar 5-8 70-250

    Zr, delayed CMHPG, HPG 9-11 200-400

    Zr-a, delayed CMHPG 3-6 70-275

    Ti, non-delayed guar, HPG,CMHPG

    7-9 100-325

    Ti, delayed guar, HPG,CMHPG

    7-9 100-325

    Al, delayed CMHPG 4-6 70-175

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    17/26

    17

    Fluid additives

    Additive Concentration, gal or lb m added to 1000 gal clean fluid

    purpose

    biocide 0.1-1.0 gal prevent guar polymer decomposition by bacteria

    fluid loss 10-50 lb decrease leak off of fluid during fracturing breakers 0.1-10 lb provide controlled fluid viscosity reduction

    frictionreducers

    0.1-1.0 gal reduce wellbore frictional pressure loss while pumping

    surfactants 0.05-10 reduce surface tension, prevent emulsions,and wetting

    foamingagents

    1-10 gal provide stable foam with nitrogen and carbondioxide

    clay control ----- provide temporary or permanent clay -watercompatibility

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    18/26

    18

    Breakers

    Breaker Applicationtemp, deg F

    Comments

    Enzyme 60-200 Efficient breaker. Limit to below pH 10.

    Encapsulated Enzyme 60-200 Allows higher concentrations for faster breaks.

    Persulfates(Sodium,Ammonium)

    120-200 Economical. Very fast et higher temp.

    Activated persulfates 70-120 Low temperature and high pH

    Encapsulated persulfates

    120-200 Allows higher concentrations for faster breaks.

    High temperatureoxidixers

    200-325 Used where persulfates are too quick.

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    19/26

    19

    Fluid testing

    Compatibility (Precipitation of solids)Rheology (effect of temp, pH, shear)

    Fluid LossBreakingProppant carrying capacity

    Residue in the proppant packFilter-cake residue

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    20/26

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    21/26

    21

    Permeability vs. Closure Stress20/40 Brady Sand

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

    Closure Stress, psi

    P e r m e a

    b i l i t y ,

    D a r c y

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    22/26

    22

    Primary proppant selection

    (stress affected pack permeability)

    6

    8

    10

    15

    20

    0 5 10 15 20 25

    Sand

    Resin Coated Sand

    Inter.-Strength Ceramic

    Inter.-Strength Bauxite

    High-Strength Bauxite

    Closure Stress (kpsi) Secure

    Considerable lossof pack perm

    kpsi is 1000 psi, not Mpsi

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    23/26

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    24/26

    24

    Laboratory-Determined Permeability ofSelected Proppants at 6000 psi(Highly optimistic, KCl water )

    Proppant (API st) Proppant

    permeability (md)

    20/40 Ottawa Sand 150,00012/20 Texas Brown 200,00020/40 ISP, Ceramic 310,00020/40 HS, Bauxite 370,000

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    25/26

    25

    Main Concerns

    Proppant crush

    Proppant fine migration Gel remaining Non-Darcy flow

  • 8/10/2019 HF basic

    26/26

    26

    Procedure Decide if to fracture or not Determine size of treatment Determine main dimensions

    Understand role of rock properties andstress states Make decisions on fluids, proppants Carry out a simple design

    Provide reasonable data for designsoftware Generate pics Evaluate job, make strategic suggestions