hieber, daniel w. 2012. the politically incorrect guide to language … · 2018. 4. 3. · language...
TRANSCRIPT
Hieber, Daniel W. 2012. The politically incorrect guide to language death. Invited guest lecture, Anthropology 305: ‘Language & Culture’, Professor Amy L. Paugh, Department of Anthropology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, Nov. 11, 2012.
Disclaimer:
There’s actually nothing offensive or politically
incorrect about this presentation.
How boring.2
Overview
1. The standard story
2. Question the received wisdom
3. Reach the same conclusions
Why bother with this exercise?
0 Conclusion: Language shift is complicated. Overly simplistic representations don’t give us the insights we need to address the issue.
3
The Received Story
4
0 Originally 10,000 languages4
0 6,909 living languages left10
0 50% - 90% of those will go extinct by 210014, 7
0 (Some) causes:0 Globalization
0 Technology
0 Overt political repression
0 Cultural dominance
Responses:0
Document them before 0
they die out
Revitalization and 0
reclamation programs
Government support for 0
endangered languages
5
839%
7739%
30416%
8955%
1,8241%
2,0140%
1,0380%
3390%
1330%
Languages as % of World Population10
100,000,000 to 999,999,999
0%
10,000,000 to 99,99
9,9991%
1,000,000to 9,999,
9995%
100,000 to 999,999
13%
10,000 to99,999
28%1,000 to 9
,99930%
100 to 999
16%
10 to 995%
1 to 92%
Languages by Speaker Population10
Language Vitality9
7
4%9%
10%
10%
11%
57%
Extinct since 1950
Severely endangered
Critically endangered
Vulnerable
Definitely endangered
Safe or data-deficient
Language Vitality9
8
4%9%
10%
10%
11%???Safe
???Data-deficient
Extinct since 1950
Severely endangered
Critically endangered
Vulnerable
Definitely endangered
Safe
Data-deficient
Why worry about language death?
0 Value to linguistic science
0 Irreplacable cultural heritage
0 Loss of indigenous knowledge about the world
0 Loss of indigenous perspectives on the world
0 Loss of cultural identity
0 Concommitant decline in biodiversity
0 Language as a human right
0 Benefits of mother tongue education and bilingualism
0 Language death is happening faster now than before
9
A Closer Look at Language Death
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
~ Mark Twain
10
The Original Languagesante 8,000 BC
0 Neolithic population estimate: 10 million9
0 Hunter-gathering can only support small communities
0 Constant fracturing of groups into new branches
0 Each group speaks a slightly different language variety
0 Received wisdom:
0 < ~500 – 1,000 speakers per language7
0 ~ 5,000 – 20,000 languages as of 10,000 y.a.
11
12NSW Department of Education and Communities:http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/shared/abmaps/nations.htm
0 Question: Languages or dialect continuum?
0 Question: Can we meaningfully compare language statistics from today to the Paleolithic?
13
The Agrarian Revolution8,000 – 5,000 BC
Sedentary lifestyle supports larger communities0
Languages grow and crowd each other out / absorb 0
other speaker communities
Received wisdom:0
Languages have been continuously on the decline0
Decrease in # of languages offset by population 0
explosion7
Earliest instance of urbanization0
Renfew0 -Bellwood Effect – decrease in deep-level diversity, i.e. the number of language families7
14
0 Question: Is language death a modern phenomenon?
0 Question: Are the causes of language death today compared to in early history different in kind or simply degree? Is language death today a fundamentally different phenomenon?
15
Counting Languages
16
0 What’s a language?
0 Mutual intelligibilityL1
L2
L3
L4
L5
Dialect chain
Counting Languages
17
0 What’s a language?
0 Mutual intelligibilityL1
L2
L3
L4
L5
Counting Languages
18
0 What’s a language?
0 Mutual intelligibility
0 Politics
0 Chinese
0 Serbo-Croation
0 Language attitudes
0 Scandanavian languages
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L3 = L1 or L2?
Counting Languages
19
What0 ’s a speaker?Cultural knowledge = 0
linguistic knowledgeDo younger speakers 0
count?
Knowledge of quotes, 0
proverbs
Do outsiders count?0
Linguists?0
Non0 -ethnic community members?
0 Are the numbers accurate?5
0 Self-reporting
0 Out-of-date data
0 Under-reporting
0 Australian Native Title1
0 Over-reporting
0 A few phrases = speaker
Ecological Metaphors
20
0 Originally 10,000 languages
0 6,909 living languages left
0 50% - 90% of those will go extinct by 2100
0 (Some) causes:
0 Globalization
0 Technology
0 Overt political repression
0 Cultural dominance
0 Responses:
0 Document them before they die out
0 Revitalization and reclamation programs
0 Government support for endangered languages
Ecological Metaphors
0 Language death / extinction
0 Competition
0 Language ecologies
0 Preservation / revitalization
0 Question: Are languages like organisms? How so? Why not?
0 Question: Which of these metaphors are useful? In what ways?
21
Language & Ecology
0 Clear correlation between linguistic and biological diversity16
0 Language ecology – relationship between languages and the people who speak them5, 6
0 Strong version – theory of language competition13
0 Ecolinguistics – branch of language ecology5
0 Discounts notion of competition
0 Focus on connection between language and their ‘habitat’ or social, political, and economic contexts
22
23
0 Question: Are the causes of language death and biological extinction the same?
0 Question: Are the metaphors of language competition and ecologies useful? Or do they obscure the issues?
0 Question: Do languages compete/die/have habitats, or do speakers, or both?
0 Question: What terminology could we use that might more accurately represent these phenomena?
0 Question: Do you think any of the terminology we’ve discussed is offensive or denigrating?
24
0 Question: Languages naturally change and differentiate from each other over time. Is the rate of linguistic diversification equal to the rate of language shift / death?
0 Question: Should we distinguish different types of diversity? What types?
0 Question: Will dying languages be replaced by new ones? Will the rate of replacement equal the rate of extinction?
25
Language Birth
26
0 Pidgins and creoles
0 Revitalized languages
0 Linguistic diversification
0 Latin > Spanish, Catalan, Corsican, French, Italian, Galician, Mozarabic, Occitan, Portugese, Romansh
0 Regular processes of historical change
Chinglish0 (China)Singlish0 (Singapore)Sheng (Nairobi)0
Portu0 nol (Brazil)
Nubi0 (Arabic: Kenya)Afrikaans (S. Africa)0
Gullah (S.E. U.S. coast)0
Krio0 (Sierra Leone)Kreyol0 (Liberia)Haitian Creole (Haiti)0
Patwa0 (Dominica)Ladino (Judeo0 -Spanish)
Hunting for the Roots of the Language Shift
0 Question: How true are the following statements?0 ‘Indigenous languages are dying because they can’t
express concepts needed for the modern world.’
0 ‘Indigenous languages are dying because they’re some of the most complex and hardest to learn.’
0 Question: What is globalization?0 Is globalization a cause or a result of language shift, or
both?
0 How can globalization actually support linguistic diversity?
27
Overt and Covert Causes
28
0 Natural catastrophes
0 War and genocide
0 Language policy
0 Compulsory education
0 Linguistic nationalism
0 Economic conditions
0 Political autonomy
0 Language attitudes and associations
0 Revitalization efforts?
0 Technology?
Question0 : How is language shift in autochthonous communities similar or different to language shift in immigrant communities?
Question: Which is more important for understanding 0
language shift – the language a person speaks, or the language they teach their children?
29
How should we respond?
30
0 “Let them die in peace.”11
0 “It is paternalistic of linguists to assume that they know what is best for the community.”8
0 “Patwa is keeping back the children.”15
0 “it is most urgent to document languages before they disappear”7
0 “our global village must be truly multicultural and multilingual, or it will not exist at all.”14
0 “Language death is a terrible loss, to all who come into contact with it”5
Subjectivity and Language
0 Question: Is the value of language objective or subjective? (Note: subjective ≠ arbitrary)
0 Question: Are languages mutually exclusive? Are they even in direct competition?
31
Conclusion
0 Language endangerment is complicated.0 (Sorry if you were hoping for a straightforward
conclusion.)
0 Overly simplistic representations don’t give us the insights we need to actually address the issue.
0 A great deal more research needs to be done in understanding the precise causes of language shift, so that communities can best address this phenomenon in the way that is most appropriate for them.
32
Contact Information
Daniel W. Hieber
Rosetta Stone
Slides and other presentations available on website:
www.danielhieber.com
33
Further Reading
EndangeredLanguages.com0
Dying Words0 by Nicholas Evans
When Languages Die0 by K. David Harrison
0 ‘Why do languages die?’ by Daniel W. Hieber
34
Sources1. Boynton, Jessica. 2011. The cost of language mobilisation. SSILA Summer Meeting, Boulder, CO.2. Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge University Press.3. Endangered Languages. 2012. The Linguist List at Eastern Michigan University and The University of
Hawaii at Manoa. http://www.endangeredlanguages.com4. Evans, Nicholas. 2010. Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Wiley-
Blackwell.5. Grenoble, Lenore A. 2011. Language ecology and endangerment. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank
(eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. 27-45. Cambridge University Press.6. Haugen, Einar. 1972. The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford University Press.7. Krauss, Michael E. 1992. The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68(1): 4-10.8. Ladefoged, Peter. 1992. Another view of endangered languages. Language 68(4): 809-811.9. Lee, R. B. & I. DeVore (eds.). 1968. Man the Hunter. Aldine.10. Lewis, M. Paul (ed.), 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edn. SIL International. Online
version: http://www.ethnologue.com11. Malik, Kenan. 2000. Let them die. Prospect, November. Online version:
http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/die.html12. Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. UNESCO. Online
version: http://www.unesco.org/culture/languages-atlas/en/atlasmap.html13. Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution (Cambridge Approaches to Language
Contact). Cambridge University Press.14. Nettle, Daniel & Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages.
Oxford University Press.15. Paugh, Amy L. 2012. Playing with Languages: Children and Change in a Caribbean Village. Berghahn
Books.16. Sutherland, William J. 2003. Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species.
Nature 423: 276-9.35