hierarchical decomposition of minimally invasive surgery: a valuable research and investigative tool...
TRANSCRIPT
NissenFundoplication
Prepare patient Divide peritoneum Divide short gastricsExpose crura and
GE junctionWrap fundus CloseRepair crura
DividePull fundus
underAnchorfundus
JoinSuturewrap
Elevateesophagus
Locate Locate Locate LocateDivide Divide
Slipgrasperunder
LiftGraspfundus
Transfergrasp
Pull acrossInsert
endostitchSuture Knot Cut suture Suture Knot Cut suture
Reach andorient
Grasp andhold / cut
Push Pull Release
Switch tool
Hierarchical Decomposition of Minimally Invasive Surgery:A Valuable Research and Investigative Tool
MacKenzie, C.L., Ibbotson, J.A., Cao, C.G.L. & Lomax, A.J., Simon Fraser University, Canada
AcknowledgementsThanks to the surgeons, O.R. staff, and patients. Thanks to E. Lee, S. Manske, and B. Zheng.
Funded by British Columbia Health Research Foundation (BCHRF) and Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), Canada.
What surgical steps are difficult and take time?Note the time to wrap fundus is shortened when the short gastrics are cut
Where is the surgeon looking?Analysis of gaze patterns: on the monitor, down on hands, away
Total Number of Motions for Suturing (both tools)
0
2
4
6
810
12
14
16
18
reach & orient grasp & hold/cut push pull release
Motion
Fre
quen
cy
normal suture
anchor suture
What motions are performed most often during suturing?Reaching and orienting
4. Results
1. Background Complex activities break down to progressively smaller units
(Miller, Galanter & Pribram, 1960)
Human factors, task analysis, user-task-tool
2. Purpose1. To study the surgeon as the user of the technology in a complex
human-machine system
2. To decompose minimally invasive surgery hierarchically
3. Method Videotape laparoscopic procedures:
- cholecystectomies (n = 4)
- inguinal hernia repairs (n = 4)
- Nissen fundoplications (n = 9)
Define events e.g., tool entries, gaze shift, goal attainment
Develop hierarchical decomposition
Operationally define beginnings and endings of:
- surgical steps
- substeps
- tasks
- subtasks
- tool motions
Annotate videotapes and perform analyses on the timing of events.
5. Discussion Hierarchical decomposition can be used to:
1. Evaluate surgeons’ performance
2. Design training for surgery e.g., with augmented or virtual environments
Modular sections correspond to our procedural breakdown
3. Evaluate surgeons’ learning
4. Design and evaluate effectiveness of new tools
5. Evaluate different aspects of O.R. layout e.g., monitor display position
6. Preoperative planning of patient-specific surgery
7. Analyze surgeons’ focus of attention at different levels of the hierarchy
8. Improve safety and decrease errors
9. Make a better “fit” between technology and the surgeon.
6. ReferencesCao, C.G.L., MacKenzie, C.L., Ibbotson, J.A., Turner, L.J., Blair, N.P. and Nagy, A.G. (1999).
Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic procedures. In Westwood, J.D., Hoffman, H.M., Robb, R.A., & Stredney, D. (Eds.), The convergence of physical and informational technologies: Options for a new era in healthcare. (MMVR: 7). Amsterdam: IOS Press, 83-89.
Ibbotson, J.A., MacKenzie, C.L., Cao, C.G.L., and Lomax, A.J. (1999). Gaze patterns in laparoscopic surgery. In Westwood, J.D., et al. (Eds.) The convergence of physical and informational technologies: Options for a new era in healthcare. (MMVR: 7). Amsterdam: IOS Press, 154-160.
MacKenzie, C.L., Ibbotson, J.A., Cao, C.G.L. and Lomax, A.J. (1998). Intelligent tools for minimally invasive surgery: Safety and error issues. In Proceedings of Enhancing patient safety and reducing errors in health care. Chicago: National Patient Safety Foundation, 226-229.
Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Duration of Fundoplication Surgical Steps
05
10152025303540
prepare patient divideperitoneum
expose cruraand EG junction
repair crura divide shortgastrics
wrap fundus
Surgical Step
Dura
tion
(m
inut
es)
No Division
Divide Short Gastrics