high, clif - alta report vol. 11 (2006.06.03 - 2006.07.16) (eng) (pdf) [alta1206all]

7/31/2019 High, Clif - ALTA Report Vol. 11 (2006.06.03 - 2006.07.16) (eng) (pdf) [ALTA1206ALL]

1/67

ALTA IR - 1206 -Introduction - June 3, 2006

Asymmetric Language Trend Analysis Intelligence ReportChanges in language precede changes in behavior.

By Tenax SE for HalfPastHuman.com

Note this report is offered for entertainment value only. Any resemblance between the events portrayed in

this report and any developing reality is purely co-incidental and in no manner represents foreknowledge on

the part of the authors of this report.

Note that this information is derived from humans expressing themselves on the internet. As such, human

emotional values and the words used to express them are being sampled and interpreted here, NOT THEFUTURE. Any resemblance between this report and future developments is entirely in the mind of the

perceiver and does not exist in reality. The Authors cannot be held liable for accuracy of lack thereof in this

report. Authors cannot be held liable for human interpretation of this report nor any action any human takesas a result of this report. Any human foolish enough to alter their behavior based on this entertainment-onlyanalysis demonstrates themselves incapable of rational appreciation of reality, and the authors are explicitly

held harmless and blameless for any and all such mental aberrations on the part of the reader.

06.03.2006

Note: Entities are identified by a blue typeface. Aspect words are enclosed in square brackets []. Attribute

words/phrases are within parentheses (). Near sentences or concepts composed of both leading aspect and

trailing attributes are single quoted '. Interpretive editorial comments are preceded by an asterisk *.Editorial notes are within {} curly braces.

Our expectations are to achieve 70+ million reads within our bandwidth limitations. We expect a 6 part

report series from this data set.

Time Maps - A view forward

Consider the following chart.

Chart 1


2/67

This chart was developed for the ALTA 1006 series and is the expression of the totality of emotional sums

shifts within the modelspace. The horizontal scale is an expression of time denoted in days (more about that

below), and the vertical scale is the summation value range for the emotional sums. The numeric value onthe vertical scale is relatively meaningless. It could just as easily be stated in hundreds or double digit

values. It derives from our early assumptions and that we began the project in 1997 with a range for

emotive values which went from -1 to 1 (minus/negative 1/one to positive 1/one). As the work has evolvedover time we have had to adjust various scales given developing circumstances. This has led to the current

range of minus -100/one hundred to 100/one hundred. The basis of the range is the correlation between

rising emotional tension, and rising numeric values. The reverse is true for the falling emotional values.Within our work we refer to periods of time when emotions are 'rising' as 'building emotional periods'.

Conversely, when the numeric values are falling we label such a time as a 'release period'. As may be

guessed, both of these terms stem from the manner in which humans, both in the individual and the

aggregate, digest emotional stressors. At the basis of our work, we have extrapolated certain characteristics

of humans and their methods of emotional expression. One of our premises is that stressors on the humansinduce emotional responses after a period of 'accretion' or gathering of emotional stressors. These are

internally digested, and once a 'trigger' level has been reached, humans release the emotion, that is, express

it or manifest its impact.

Our work attempts to capture 'leaks' of both current and future emotional expression within the linguistic

shifts which humans betray within their daily choice of words. Our work is further predicated on thepremise that behavioral changes, especially within masses of humans, are motivated by emotionalmanifestation. Thus the theory that if we could monitor changing emotions, and accurately calculate the

'percolation time' between stressor input and emotional output, we could predict future behavioral changes

on a broad scale. The 'percolation time' is at the core of the work. This is a best guess as to how long it

takes for an event/circumstance to which there is an emotional component to 'work its way through the

system' to where the emotional response to the event is being manifest into the universe at large.

One can ascertain that the 'percolation time' is both the key to the whole of the process, and the weakest

link in our chain. This lag between stressor and emotional reaction is a hugely variant component. Inobservation this can easily be validated by merely observing how individual humans react to various

emotional stressors. Of course the very first variant is the individual human. As human responses to the

same stressor are widely ranging, it was initially quite clear that the largest possible level of inputs for our

work would be required just to smooth over the whole variance of individual response issue. So withhumans widely and wildly variant in how they react to various emotions, and noting that individual humans

themselves are also inconsistent in reactions, that is their health, state of mind, et al contributes to how they

respond emotionally to the same stimulus, it became necessary to pursue our work within a range of values

which we were assuming that we had incorrectly localized at any given point. Basically, as the whole of theprocess was based on some very wide possible ranges, we had to assume that we had our numeric

representations "off" by some degree at any given time. Thus the value adjustment or 'tuning of the lexicon'

which is an integral part of the processing. To lay it out plain, our timing sucks.

As noted the 'percolation time' is a key component of our whole effort. We usually are incorrect in this area

whereas we may have other aspects of our Time Map well laid out. The inaccuracy of this part of the

processing is well known to us and arises due to the other core part of the processing. In beginning this oddlinguistic exercise we had to start somewhere, so a copy of a very extensive English language dictionary in

electronic format was obtained. The definitions were stripped out leaving only the word list. This lexiconwas then placed as the 'key field' or primary key in a large database. At that point a series of associations

were made between words which then formed our 'descriptor sets' in which all those words which were

variants of a theme were linked. We then linked the words within the lexicon based on a large number(potentially up to 640 - multi-dimensional array, 64 by 10) of other associations. These include such things

as word types, commonly shared usage/phrases, and our range of numeric emotional indicators which arethe grist for the mill of the modelspace and which provide the numeric values which allow us to both place

word groupings within our modelspace and which are used to create the charts placed within these reports.


3/67

Any discussion about our timing values must note that our time values are human and not calendar focused.

For instance we ended up using a lunar calendar month as most humans seem to respond to that

emotionally when viewed in the aggregate. Further we have many celestial markers such as the equinoxes

and the solstices, but also note that cultural calendars trump solar associations as in the 'summer' beingdefined as Memorial Day to Labor Day (end of May to early September) within the USofA, whereas much

of Franco influenced Europe thinks of 'summer' as the month of vacation which is usually August. Other

variants of course extend to northern versus southern hemisphere climate realities.

Within the limitations expressed above, what we have done at the core level is to assign a series of numbers

to various lexical descriptors in various categories. For instance take the word 'jak' or 'jacked' with themeaning of 'to take by force or intimidation'. This word, being newly derived from slang, has a very high

'immediacy value' as it is emotionally loaded. As a general rule, slang develops within the culture within

each new generation in order to 'reprioritize' the emotional expressions of the generation. In other words the

idea is to to *not* use your parents emotive triggers as they are 'old and tired' and have less emotional

trigger impact for your generation. So each generation develops its own new lexicon additions. Further, asthese words gain popular acceptance and understanding, they are internalized to certain emotional levels or

triggers which have become fixed by popular peer pressures *within that generation*. This explains why

old farts *never* do slang well. Using slang which is out-of-your-generation is risky given that youremotional reaction to work groupings is inherently different from that of the slang creating generation. At

least they think so, therefore out-of-generation usage of slang always comes across as misplaced, thus its

consistent use as an emotional prop within media. But, for our work, even the attempt at the use of theslang words is revealing. And to return to our illustration, the word 'jak' has very high emotive values in

both immediacy and short-term, but has very low long-term-impact values. Thus when we discover the

word being used within our data set, it tends to drive up the immediacy sums for the area in which it

appears, and to reduce the longer term values for that same group. Make sense?

Now multiply this by a few tens of millions, et viola, you're in the extreme linguistics business.

Oh, for your information, we have defined the "immediacy" value set as being from 3/three days to the end

of 3/three weeks, while short term value set is from 3/three weeks (beginning thereof) out to the end of3/three months. Long term values are sub divided into an additional 8/eight sets but continue on from

3/three months out to over 18/eighteen months. As may be expected, our longer term values also drop off in

accuracy the further out we go.

Our process begins and ends with our spyders which are computer programs which eat words off the

internet in their hundreds of billions. We throw away most of the words as not being pertinent to our goals,

and then process the others into a giant numeric stew. The resulting values are then reduced to a very small

set of key indicators which then get associated with a group of X, Y, Z values, and such things as colorindicators, and cross link associations. These numbers then allow us to turn on and color a single pixel in

our 3/three dimensional modelspace to represent that particular word descriptor set.

Our visual modelspace is basically a virtual aquarium space of 3/three dimensions all of which have a scale

of 60 units each unit of which is composed of either a lunar day (X axis), an emotional numeric value (Y

axis), or a change deviation numeric value (Z axis). It is the changing groups of supporting words and their

emotional numeric values captured within lexical proximate to our descriptor sets which drive themodelspace forward in time. The modelspace has several emotionally neutral areas which are considered to

be 'zero zones' in which the emotional values are neutral to behavioral change generation. The modelspaceis too complex to provide a visual representation within our reports. Further, there is *NO* visual clue as to

what group of words a pixel is actually linked. This is determined with a further level of processing after

attractive groups of pixels are visually located within modelspace.

To make the links back to the descriptor sets for our interpretations which provide the bulk of the ALTAreport series, we must locate a grouping of pixels to examine, note their cross links by turning on cross

links within the modelspace, note the termination points (as an XYZ,ColorHue, ColorVariant, Motion,

DirectionVariant) set of coordinates, and then use these to trace back to the lexicon to discover the

associated word group as a descriptor. At that point, the 'found' word is what we term to be an 'aspect' or


4/67

the 'head of a related, emotionally, current discussion word set'. Each aspect is supported by a set of words

of indeterminate size which are interpreted to define the meaning within the modelspace of this "linguistic

leak of emotional pressures on behavior change". Clear as mud?

So the modelspace is too large in data to provide within these reports, and is meaningless without the work

of associating pixel groups with word groups. We have extrapolated a charting technique from the

modelspace as is illustrated above, but we continually note that this is a very very flat representation of avery dynamic, and complex structure. Further the charts are of a necessity *only* expressing the extreme

values as they represent summation sets. Thus the nuances are totally lost within the charting. Further the

charts are a frozen view of a dynamic process. Thus we have had emotional descriptor sets indicate abehavior change which initially was being pegged to a particular date, which after later processing was

moved to some other date due to additions to the sums from new data. So the charts should be taken as only

of a momentary accuracy.

Further it needs to be noted that all charts as snapshots or frozen numeric sums represented visually will*not* show any changes to the emotional landscape as the various behavioral changes come about and then

themselves ripple outward in effects which alter discussion sets on the internet and thus our next set of data

gathering. We do get some hints about these ripples, but not reliably to the level of intensity.

One last note about our modelspace is that groups of pixels are aggregated by our processing such that they

are together within the model and form what we call 'entities' An entity is a grouping of descriptor setsaround a central theme, usually one we wish to track. An example of an entity would be the Terra entity asa proxy for the emotional relationship between humans and planet earth, or the Markets entity as a proxy

for the emotional relationship with the 'money industries'. We need to note that an entity definition may

include tens of thousands of descriptors with associated cross links. These entities are complex, and as

language changes, we must also change our entity definitions in order to stay current with linguistic

nuance. Thus is could be seen that the very nature of the entity can and does change over time. As aninstance our initial BushCo entity, representing the aggregate of Bush political, corporate, conservative,

religious and media cabal has over time decreased into the current Bushista entity. This occurred as the

various corporate, media, military and other sub sets have moved out of the entity as the various constituentgroups have been disappointed and emotionally disenfranchised from the Bush cabal. We see these

movements of emotional attachment months before the general mainstream media stumbles over them.

Meta Data - Zipf's Distribution Discovery Dynamically Done

As any linguist may suspect in seeing our results for the first time, much of our work is based on Zipf's

Law and unique corollaries, and complementary extensions to the premise of our own devising. In the case

of this work, the core of it has been to extend Zipf's Law to the dynamism which is now possible due to theinternet. As noted ad nauseam, our work is based on the changes within the lexicons in use, lexical shifts

from lexicon to lexicon (primary domain shifts predicated on lexicon shifts), and the attempt to gather and

extrapolate from data in a near-real-time fashion. As an interesting aside, it is Zipf's Law which allows the"bible codes" to always provide just what the questioner wants to find, as long as it is run against

letter/word/numeral languages such as hebrew, and when applied to events or circumstances, as long as it is

done so retroactively. In other words, the Zipf's ratios provide for distribution patterns which will *always*

manifest after the fact. Not really useful for predictive work.

One of our extensions to Zipf's work is used to develop what we have termed to be 'meta data influences'. Ameta data influence occurs when the same descriptor set, referencing the same emotively defined value set

occurs in multiple entities simultaneously. Within our entities, or collections of complex descriptor sets

clustered around central themes, the appearance of a specific descriptor set which also is found with thesame level of primary specificity in other entities, marks the rise of a 'meta data layer'. An example of this

is the currently active 'secrets revealed' meta data layer which is appearing in almost all of the entitieswithin the modelspace. We must note that while common to the entities, the meta data layers are more

impacting on some entities that others, and the impacts vary over time. So, as an example which may be

easily observed within "real life" or manifesting circumstances, we offer the 'secrets revealed' meta data

layer and its appearance over these last 2/two years within the Bushista entity (getting close to peaking


5/67

within this entity), as well as in other entities such as the Terra entity wherein we have had a number of

years of increasing anxiety about 'secrets' being revealed concerning climate change. It is also possible to

observe the rise of the 'secrets revealed' meta data influence on any number of "real life" analogs to our

modelspace entities. Take as an example, the Markets entity. It only takes a casual glance at recentmainstream media outputs to come across the common theme that we are expressing as 'secrets revealed'.

These meta data layers build up within the various entities over time, and progress from general behavioralinfluences within a specific entity, to broader influences felt across a number of entities if not the whole of

modelspace. Along with 'secrets revealed' as a current meta data layer, we also have 'aggression' and newly

emerging 'transformation'. There are a number of other meta data layers which will be discussed as we goforward with the series including 'rebellion/revolution', 'encounters with scarcity' and others, but for this

introduction our attention is focused on the first two layers mentioned, 'secrets revealed' and 'aggression'.

Both of these layers have been in operation, or "affective" as we say here in the radical linguistics business,

for several years at this point. New developments within the last two report series show these two layers

merging into a larger and much more complex meta data layer which we have labeled as 'conflict'. Nownote that we label these layers. We do so deliberately after much analysis and discussion, but where ever

possible we label the meta data layer with words from as high up within the descriptor set as possible. Thus

in the case of the emerging 'conflict' meta data layer, there are thousands of words/aspects within thedescriptor set from which to choose. Our guide in choosing labels is as broad as possible a context while

retaining the highest emotional values. Thus for instance we did not choose 'war' as it has a higher than the

mean emotive value, and is much more restrictive a descriptor within the connotations it produces than ouralternative of 'conflict'. Does that make sense? Clear as mud?

In the last 2/two series, a meta data layer has been observed forming within the longer term processing of

the values for those series. Now, time being what it is, we have reached near to the manifestation point that

we are projecting for the appearance of the 'conflict' meta data layer. As noted in the chart below, and

within the last series, our data shows that the new layer will be effective on August 31, 2006, very late inthe night, Pacific Coast of North America time zone. When examining the chart below, do not allow the

large change of direction within the trend line at that time-point on August 31 to amplify the concept of

'conflict'. The trend line rises due to the totality of all the emotional sums for all of the entities and *not*from just the meta data layer itself.

Chart 2

The chart above shows the aggregate sums of the emotive values which is to say, all the values, both

positive and negative, within their respective cohorts (immediacy, short term, longer term ranges), and theresultant sum is charted here. This is a very very crude way of compressing down the data within

modelspace. We offer the charts only as a visual aid for the discussions, and of a necessity are frequently

having to provide long discussions about how the modelspace actually deviates from the flattened 2/twodimensional version shown within the charts.


6/67

So, to be clear is good. We do not expect 'war' to break out planet wide on August 31, 2006. We do expect

that the 'conflict' meta data layer will manifest its influence on events of that day and early September. We

also do expect that the very rapid change from the emotional release period into the very steeply rising

emotional building period to manifest as an event or series of trigger events which will propel humanity upthe emotional trend line shown. A further chart to reinforce and clarify the concept.

Chart 3

To begin this ALTA report series, given the rapidly rising complexity which we are facing as multiple meta

data layers push their influences into the various entities, and given recent events "on the ground" here on

earth, we are providing a summation chart from the ALTA 1006 series as a jumping off point for the

interpretations for this current series.

Chart 4

In order to provide some guidance as to how to measure or plot our projections against real world

manifesting circumstances, we are providing the following chart which was produced for ALTA reportseries posted in early Spring of 2005. This chart provides an early charting of the emotive value sums for

the period within which the Katrina/Rita/Fema disasters struck the USofA. Given how recent the events,the emotive reactions are likely still fresh, and should provide a basis for understanding the kinds of

emotive reactions we mean when we discuss 'building' and 'release' periods.


7/67

Chart 5

Note that the vertical scale is *not* the same on both charts. To reconcile the values sets, you can note thatin Chart 4, the very first red circle labeled as a 'revolution' within USofA separated from 'rebellion' is the

equivalent of the totality of release from all of the Katrina/Rita/FEMA immediacy values within Chart 5.

Does that make sense? Restated, the first red circle on Chart 4 found near September 16 (9/16) is the same

emotive value levels as we find in Chart 5 for both of the red circles. To provide a better visual

representation of the juxtaposition of the Katrina/Rita/FEMA disaster which triggered the release periodshown on Chart 5, we are providing yet another version of the base chart for Charts 1 and 4 with the 2005

emotive summation values transposed to the current vertical scale.

Chart 6

As one may expect the data illustrated by these charts drawn from the last ALTA series gives the

impression of "interesting" days ahead for 2006 and beyond.


8/67

Conclusion: Gather by the River...just leave us the hell out of it, Administrative Notes

One of our policies is that if a subscriber irritates us with their religion, or insists on any religious

attachments to our work, we refuse their patronage thereafter. We operate under a singular approach to theemotionally hot area of religion by invoking the only prayer in our personal religion:

Oh lord, protect us from your followers!

For we have real work to do, and they just get in the way.

One other action which will result in refusal of patronage is if the contents of our copyrighted material are

posted without our permission. It really really really causes headaches in the spyder operations at the server

end the next time we go out gathering data.

Our data is flowing and the processing for this ALTA series has begun. We will be deep into the firstinterpretation period this week with an examination of the immediacy values and any changes to the meta

data layers within the modelspace. As a rule, which is frequently broken by how the data directs, we tend to

process for immediacy values for parts 1 and 2, with short term and near-focus-longer-term values found inparts 3 and 4, and a return to immediacy values along with very long term values in parts 5 and 6. We note

that "needs must as the devil drives" and as our devil is clearly the data, we go where it directs.

We expect Part 1 to be posted by late on Saturday, June 10, 2006.

We also need to note that some personalities within universe are apparently screwing around with us on the

internet which may occasionally interfere with our email communications. So.... please check back on

Saturdays to our main page at halfpasthuman.com where we will have the announcement posted of the

latest postings, as well as the headlines from the entities.

Thank you for participating in this ALTA series.

With apologies to Rabindrinath Tagore, transliterated from Gitanjali

Where mind is without fear and the head is held high;

where knowledge is free;

where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls;

where words come out from the depth of truth;

where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection;

where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit;

where the mind is led forward into ever widening thought and action-

into that heaven of freedom, let my planet wake.

Copyright 2006 by HalfpastHuman. All rights reserved.

Released through subscription only.

No reproduction in whole or in part without prior permission.


9/67


10/67

In the chart below we need to note the second of the light cyan rectangles which encompasses from

approximately June 4th through June 19th. Along with the other two light cyan rectangles, this area is one

in which the "out and about" presence of Bush and members of the Bush cabal will be acting as 'pressure

points' around which emotional tensions will be rising. We note with some satisfaction the deliberateattempt by the Bush cabal to drive up emotional tensions over specific issues such as 'gay marriage' so as to

switch the emotive focus of the populace from the many real problems besetting the planet. Instead, the

Bush cabal would rather have the focus on an issue which they believe they can use to effectivelymanipulate 'all of the people' one way or the other.

Chart 1

This emotional tension pressuring campaign by the Bush cabal has been forecast by the changes within the

Bushista entity over these last few ALTA reports. This campaign of emotional manipulation by theBushistas, and the subsequent one to begin on or about June 25th and complete on July 5th are significant

in that they represent, as shown within the Bushista entity, the last time that the Bush cabal will be in a

position to 'drive news' or implement any form of political action other than reaction. Further, both of therectangle bound periods which terminate on June 5th also are entirely being driven, as is shown within the

extensive cross links, by the Markets entity.

It is as though the Bush cabal had been given instructions to mount a very emotional campaign around avery emotional subject in order that the populace should be very distracted during the month of June. The

Markets entity points toward this being the case due to the rapid rise of the 'dollar death' aspect/attribute set

to primacy, and due to its huge number of cross links over to the Bushista entity. The immediacy value

processing as well as the short term value processing are all moving, within the Markets entity, the Bushista

entity, and the 2/two populace entities, toward the lexical point that 'inner change' is going to be manifestedby 'outer alterations'. Further an alternative interpretation of the dominant aspect for the Markets entity over

the Summer of 2006 is 'distillation' as an aspect with supporting attributes going to the idea that 'distillation

of the inner core leaves mud/debris'.

As primary supporting aspect/attribute sets for the rise of 'inner change/alteration' or 'distillation' of the

Markets entity, we find that 'arrogance' and 'fear' and 'greed' are the three sets most prominently situatedwithin 'distillation'. Further there is much language to support the idea that 'fear' is overwhelming 'greed' as

a direct trigger effect of the emerging 'distillation'. Much of this language is extensively cross linked backto 'fear' and 'anxiety' within Bushista entity where it appears that much of the resulting energy from the

'fear' is being channeled into the noted distractions.

At the core of the 'fear' aspect, both directly held and through internal to the Markets entity as well as

external over to other entities, is language going to the 'death of the dollar'. As noted on the chart above, the

first of 2/two periods of stress concerning the 'dollar, usofa' occurred around mid May. The second of these,not noted on the chart, will occur just as the emotional energies peak around/on July 5th. At that point the

trend line slips into an emotional release period. Also at that point the shift within the lexical base for the

Markets entity suggests that 'dollar death' will become a very prominent feature of the economic landscape.


11/67

The immediacy values processing of these past 9/nine days points to a 'boil' or 'turmoil' on-going but

'invisible' except to those who would know how to 'read/analyze {the} ripples/currents'. Further elements

within the lexical set have accrued such that the imagery is of a 'hole needing {to be} filled'. This and otherlanguage suggests the emergence of a very large push, with lots of emotional pressure behind it, to 'fill the

hole'. As there are very extensive cross links to the Gold/Silver/PM's entity, as well as much in the way of

'commodities' referenced, it seems safe to suggest that the language is pointing to a 'boiling/turmoil' behindthe scenes as those with 'holes' {ed note: in their shorts} are desperately maneuvering to 'fill them'.

Further, as we examine the language accretions to the Markets entity in both the immediacy values area andthe short term value set {ed note: taking us through August}, we find that the emotional boiling is just

starting. As with all 'boiling', our Markets entity lexical 'boiling' begins with a number of bubbles, which

rise to the surface, and pop, releasing their heat and steam. This is very much the picture that our descriptor

set is painting. We first have a lexical sketch for all of the bubbles, most notably the 'housing' bubble as the

point of concern in the last few months, and now, as the emotional momentum increases, the next 'bubble'being featured within the Markets entity is the 'dollar' bubble of these last few decades. The popping of the

'dollar bubble' as shown by the data set will occur over the course of several months. The first hint the

language gave placed the inception date of the meme in mid May, with the manifestation of the visible echoeffect coming on July 5th though the 8th.

As had been noted in previous ALTA reports of this year, a situation would emerge this Summer in which aBush cabal spokesperson would render some 'bad words/mal mots' about a developing financial/marketssituation, and make things worse. In fact, the data now points to some more details in that this descriptor set

is going to the idea of 'arrogant behavior radiates importance', but, as is shown within the supporting

aspect/attribute set, the 'speaker/spokesperson' does not 'grasp the process, nor value', and their 'words

push/drive proceeding' which in turn is seen as 'provoking misery'. Somehow the 'words of the face' are to

'trigger changes {at the/to the} core' such that 'once black' the 'spots run with yellow fear' while 'cold bloodfills the feet'.

The 'change' which will be 'induced {by} fear {of the} yellow spots' is seen as being 'repeatedly discussed'.This latter data set is suggesting that the 'discussion' itself, that is, the mere fact that it is occurring within

the public fora, is important. Much of the discussion language within the data set is cross linked internally

within Markets back to the aspect of 'danger'. This 'discussion of dangers/danger/risk' is shown as 'covered

3/three times', and on the last is 'accepted'. One interpretation of this language is a series of publicdiscussions such as press conferences which will follow the 'gaff/malprop' of the Bushista which is felt as a

proximate trigger to subsequent behavior changes within Markets. These 'public discussions' are viewed as

important drivers of a very large change in attitude or mind set within the public at large. This is shown as

occurring during our 'release period' which begins on or about July 1, and extends until August 31.

Gold/Silver/Commodities - Destruction of the Feet

EDITORIAL NOTE: We do not forecast prices with our work, but rather look to the discovery of

emotional trends. These in turn affect prices/currencies, but need not do so. In other words the currentemotional trends are for 'desire to acquire' commodities such as gold and silver. Recent price movements

are running contrary to all the emotional indicators that we have within modelspace. Given the nature andsize of the gold/silver markets, the supposition on our part is that a very large manipulation is on-

going/manifesting. The emotional trends of the last few months are still in place, and still being reinforced

by new value sets being processed. Therefore the counter-trend pricing would appear to be the result oflarge scale "paper pushing" as an attempt to drive down prices, very likely as an attempt to cover short

positions. In spite of the movement seen within the prices for gold and silver, we still maintain that theemotional values and the trends/movements within modelspace are for 'desire to acquire'. Further, all our

lexical sets are gaining in emotional values in the direction of positive perception for gold/silver, and as

noted above, a negative or 'dying' position for the 'dollar, usofa'.


12/67

The current data for the Gold/Silver/Commodities entity as gathered for this series of reports shows a

continuing build in both the impact of 'duality' within the real world, as well as a continuing of 'alteration of

core/basis/fundamentals'. As noted above, the emotive sums associated with Commodities as an entity are

still accruing positive for 'acquisition' and 'want'. Further we note that the rising aspect/attribute set withinthe Commodities entity goes to 'feet destroyed, life becomes hell'. While this is indeed a very negative

linguistic set with very high emotive sums, and while it is supported by a number of aspects going to

bespoke emotions such as 'sorrow', 'desire', 'need', and others, the whole of the area within the entity isfocused external. The cross links are very pointedly showing that this lexical set is describing a

'cause/driver' for the short term, and longer term value sets. The emotional 'driver' for later this Summer

and beyond is shown as a 'world under-going/encountering/enduring destroyed feet'. This aspect/attributeset has extensive support with imagery providing a view in which 'shortages dominate', and in which 'few

sleep soundly, weeks of hell', and 'beds not restful, destroyed structures hang overhead {in} dreams'. Other

imagery is painting a picture in which a combination of a number of factors are congealing into a situation

difficult to understand.

There are a number of supporting lexical structures going to variants of the idea of 'destruction {of the} old

regime' and 'destruction {of the} dominant clique/group/mode'. At the top of this structure we note that

numbers of cross links going over to both Markets and the 2/two populace entities, Populace/USofA andGlobalPop all terminate within aspect sets which go to the idea of a time in which the 'destructive ones' are

to 'reach the summit'. One other interpretation is that can be reached is also supported by the data set and

goes to the image of 'summit of destructiveness {will be soon} reached'. This last is supported in turn by'skin wounded, battle stalls, destruction complete'. Our interpretation from the data is that the recent global

price action in both paper and goods markets (commodities) is a manifestation of this 'destruction of the

past dominant clique' which is both on-going at the time of this writing, as well as being linked to the

'dollar death'. It is clear from the linguistic sets we have now, that while the paper markets may well

continue downward in price, the commodities will reach the limit of their 'summit of destructiveness' within

the next 3/three months with the majority of that 'destructiveness' being reached within the next 3/threeweeks. This area is apparently going to the idea of the 'destruction of the past dominant {paradigm/milieu}'

which will be reaching near to its 'summit' of destruction soon. However, the 'dollar death' is *not*

included within these aspects/attribute sets and will specifically continue all through Summer such that itparticipates within both the emotional release period {July 5 m/l through August 31} and the subsequent

emotional build period. Further we find that 'dollar' references within the Commodities entity are

redundantly and extensively linked back over to meta data layers participating in the 'conflict' manifestation

of September and beyond.

Even as we examine the data set, the values continue to accrue for a 'destruction of the feet' such that 'all

things change' and that 'life become hell' for a great many. However grim the wording, it is also supported

by aspect/attribute sets going to the idea of a 'beginning'. This 'beginning' aspect is fully supported, and isrising in both shorter term values and the longer term value set. The implication is that a new 'beginning'

which is characterized as 'innocent/pure/fresh' and which relates to 'transactions/currencies' will start later

this year as a natural outgrowth of the 'complete destruction of the feet'. This 'beginning' data set is locatedwithin the Commodities entity, and is heavily cross linked both internally and externally to the meta data

layers of 'secrets revealed' as well as 'encounter with scarcity/shortages'. The interpretation arising from our

timing clues {ed note: always to be taken very loosely, more indicators than exact dates} shows that the

'new, innocent/fresh beginning' will arise simultaneously with the manifestation of the'signs/words/malprops' of 'disease {of} paper/dollar/debt'.

Terra - Oceans - Fish Wars, Unexpected Comes True, Space Goat Farts Drive to Increase

As we once again bore the reader with endless repetition of our contention that several meta data layers aremanifesting their influences upon all and sundry, we will note that we have instances of 'encounter with

scarcity' rising with some speed within the Terra entity, 'oceans' sub set. In this aspect/attribute instance {ed

note: the meta data layers primary aspect/attribute sets are held in all entities affected, but have local

variants from the collective common set} of the 'encounter with scarcity' we run into the first supporting set


13/67

going very bluntly to 'nets without fish'. Further reinforcing the idea are both extensive cross links to the

'global shortages' appearing within the populace entities {ed note: Populace/USofA, and GlobalPop}.

The whole of this sub set of the Terra entity, 'oceans' set, is dominated by the idea of '2/two changes' whichare shown, by virtue of appearing within the immediacy and short term data sets, to manifest this Summer.

Within our timing clues, we are seeing mostly late July, and early August, however the impact of the

'encounter with scarcity' and 'no fishes in nets' lexical threads go directly to 'crisis of survival' whichappears within the long term data set of the populace entities for Fall and beyond. It is as though the

concept of 'no fishes {to be} caught' will take a while to impact the Press and other entities with the idea of

'self at risk'. However there are multiple indications for much coverage of additional 'starvation clusters',and 'risk of empty bellies' over the late Summer and into Fall.

Again this area, while participating in the meta data layer of 'encounter with scarcity', also participates,

albeit as supporting aspect/attributes, in both the 'restrictions on movement' and the 'conflict' meta data

layer. The issue of 'protein' from the oceans will apparently intrude heavily on 'local politics' such that'bans' will be issued against 'trespass on open waters', or as we are interpreting it, 'traditional fishing

grounds'. As the modelspace is progressed over the course of Summer, and into Fall, the issue of 'empty

nets' will act as a proximate trigger for 'violence, nation versus nation'.

Both the internally held instances of 'restrictions on movement' and 'conflict' within the 'oceans' sub set are

supported by the aspect/attribute set going to the idea of 'the unexpected has come true'. This particularlexical set is very high in emotive values for all 3/three primary categories of immediacy, short term, andlonger term values. The bespoke emotional descriptors of 'wonder' and 'awe/shock' are both present with

very large supporting bases. Much of the 'unexpected comes true with resounding shock/awe' language is

also focused on the Southern hemisphere oceans. While there is a considerable amount of Pacific Ocean

referencing language, nonetheless, the overwhelming amount of the descriptor accretions for the recent

processing are Southern oceans pointing. The whole of the 'unexpected comes true' language set alsocontains a complete set of descriptors in support which appear to be pointing to the 'end of the mature

relationship' between humans and oceans. We also need note that this language is both internally holding,

as well as externally cross linked back to yet another emerging meta data layer, the 'transformations' layer.Again, just to note that 'transformations' represents a 'no going back' shift from one state to another. This is

very much a descriptor set which goes to the idea of morphing, or 'deep, permanent, radical change of

state'. What this 'radical state change' will produce is not hinted at.

What we do have as hints is that when the modelspace is progressed over the Summer, the Terra entity,

'oceans' sub set picks up several aspect/attribute sets for the idea of 'rocking' or 'oscillation' between

'balanced motion' and 'backlash/backwash/backward/retrograde motions'. This effect is shown as arriving

around June 25th or so, and becoming something of a 'written curiosity' or 'spoken question' as though itwill be discussed at some length within the mainstream media. Further we find that the effect is the

proximate cause of the 'collapse of the last/final fisheries'. Much of these descriptor sets also point to

imagery that 'winds, erratic/unseasonable' are the proximate cause for the 'oceans misery'.

Terra - Fluid Motion, Fear of Ruined Shoes, 5/Five by the Side of the Road

It will come as no surprise that the data set for the Terra entity contains large quantities of aspect/attributesets going to 'storms'. The Katrina/Rita storm group of last year has boosted the subject substantially over

this time, and now we have more 'storm' talk showing up within the data sets than ever before. The largeamount of data is proving to be a problem to process, but on the whole, much more valuable within the

structure of our lexical alchemy.

A large supporting aspect for the Terra entity, as noted above, goes to the 'winds'. Within that we have the

threads which relate to, support, or are influenced by the 'oceans' sub set. We also have a very large 'winds'lexical structure which stands alone, that is it does not participate within the 'oceans' sub set, though it does

have cross links over to other 'winds' areas which do. The large, stand-alone, 'winds' section is providing

imagery for 'winds' which 'knock things askew' in so far as weather is concerned. These 'winds' are also

shown as being a very large 'carrier of misery' which will 'settle in {for the} summer'. Further we find that


14/67

several references appear to a 'contest' or 'contention' between an 'elderly, experienced' person, and a

'young', 'charismatic' person. The data set seems to be suggesting that the 'following of the younger leads to

disaster', and that in the process the 'old will be abandoned'. The scenario in which the choice between the

'younger' and the 'elder' is to be made is unclear, but it is complete held within the 'storms' and 'winds' datasets suggestive of either tornados or hurricanes.

Along with everyone else on the planet, our data also suggests that a very active, dangerous, anddestructive hurricane season is to manifest this year. The data goes to the idea of 'crippling loss' and 'blood

drains from the legs'. These areas are specifically held by 'hurricane' sub set within the 'storms, wind' sub

set of Terra entity. As the entity is moved through Summer along with the modelspace we note that muchof the values which propel the data set into extremes of emotive sums appears in late August, but extends to

nearly December. This area is difficult to extract from the overall rapid rise in emotional tension which is

apparently accompanying the 'conflict' meta data layer. Put another way, we do find a lot of very rapidly

rising emotional sums relative to 'storms' and 'hurricanes' from late August onward, but given the totality of

the emotional sums, the 'hurricane' contribution is not dominant. Make sense?

We also note that as the modelspace is progressed, the 'winds' sub set acquires a number of new elements at

the end of August, and the first part of September. These new elements participate within the 'duality', andthe 'transformation' meta data layers which extend into 2007. The implication is for 'storms' which will

'manifest' due to the 'duality' of 'wind streams' which the data shows as 'affecting each other', but not able to

'merge'. These 'twin rivers' within the atmosphere are being described as one of the primary causes of a'duality' which 'contends/confronts' the populace entities. Again we note that the 'wind' areas are alsoextensively cross linked to the fisheries issues arising later in the Summer.

Also internally held within the Terra entity, sub set 'fluid motion', and running more-or-less parallel in

emotive tension values to the 'winds' section is an area headed by the aspect of 'waves'. The 'waves' aspect

has attribute sets going to 'tsunami', though we must be clear that it is impossible for us to detect thedifference between the "fear of" an event, and the appearance of the event itself. What we do find is that the

data is clearly pointing to 'waves' being a real problem in both the short term, and longer term time frames.

Further the 'damage/destruction' caused by the 'waves' is showing to both 'humans', and their'constructions'. This latter is *not* restricted to 'off shore energy platforms', but also includes language

suggesting both coastal and inland damage from 'ocean waves'. The 'waves' are supported by a large

number of descriptors which range from the prosaic 'tidal' to 'tsunami' to 'freak'. All of the supporting sets

go to the idea of 'damage' and 'unexpected surge propels heart {to} throat'. This last is seen as affecting avery large group of people, perhaps as many as 3/three hundred, who will all apparently be watching this

'surge' from a 'high bluff'. The data suggests that this group will be 'facing west' and will have 'power eating

{at their} feet, waves lick leather'. This last we are interpreting as 'shoes' as their is other supporting

language suggesting a 'dress up' party or gathering on a 'grassy rise' which will have a whole lot of upsetfemales as their 'dresses rend/tear' as they 'fall backward, recoiling' from the appearance of 'surging waves'.

The data goes on to suggest that these unfortunate party attendees will 'fear for their lives' and will 'piss

their pants' as the 'wave appears westward' and 'grows to head height'. Bearing in mind their heads will beseveral hundred feet off the ocean on top their necks which are peering from a 'tall knoll/hill'. The 'party'

will be breaking up early as the attendees, led by their female cohort, 'recoil' down the hill, 'clothing

asunder, torn', and 'covered with mud, shaking with fear, cold'.

Again, following the 'waves' data set to is terminating aspect/attribute, we continually run into participatory

sub sets which go to 'duality'. In this case most are referencing a 'duality {between/of} salt, fresh' with asuggestion that a 'large river' of 'fresh water' will be pouring into the ocean where it will *not* mingle, and

problems with 'duality internal' will commence. This must also be examined in light of the 'no fishes in the

nets' aspect of the 'oceans' sub set as it also has 'duality', and it would be quite devastating for the oceans tosuddenly receive an unexpected river of fresh water.

The data is also providing some further details or reinforcing aspects/attribute sets in that we have a very

large number of cross links internal to the Terra entity in which the originating point is 'space', with the sub

set of 'energy' and which terminates in either the 'oceans' or the 'winds' sub sets. In all cases the 'space'

section of the Terra entity is quite clear about reporting the potential to 'receive energy' such that 'all things


15/67

increase' where the 'all things' is pointing at 'oceans, waves' sub set as well as 'winds, storms' sub set.

Further there is a direct terminating internal cross link from 'unexpected happens' within 'oceans' and the

'rising increase' sub set of 'space, energy'. Much of the 'space, energy' sub set is tied to 'aries' as the point of

origination, though this may be misleading as there are a number of 'energy events' shown, and not allpossess this link.

Also of a worrisome nature is that the 'space' sub set of the Terra entity has undergone an 80/eighty per centchange in aspect/attribute sets. Usually such large scale changes precede similar large scale events affecting

humans which induce a large scale change in behavior. That the 'space' sub set has taken on churn at this

level is indicative of some significant level of focus on the subject by mainstream media and the resultingchange in emotions throughout the populace. The main aspect/attribute set for this area, when progressed

through the modelspace moves to a rising aspect/attribute set of 'increase'. This aspect is supported by

lexical structures going to the idea of 'increase {in} winds' and 'increase in waters/waves'. Both of these are

shown as appearing *after* the 'unexpected comes true'. Then, the 'increase' in both 'winds and waves' is

shown via cross link to both populace entities as 'pushing {humans/populace} off course' such that'movements are halted, crisis'. This last is of course yet one more hook into the developing meta data layer

of 'restrictions on movement'.

In previous ALTA reports of this year we have been getting language indicating that a series of '5/five

quakes' would 'rock our world' this Summer {ed note: more or less from Memorial Day/USofA holiday -

end of May through to Labor Day, early September}. The data showed that at some point within the quakeseries, likely after the first quake, the Press would be able to get into the quake stricken area, and out wouldemerge a story about a 'postponed wedding'. Following this first quake would be a gap of days/weeks, then

there would be 3/three quakes close together with the last of the 3/three being the largest. Then the data

suggested another gap of days, more or less equal to the first gap, and yet one more, largish quake would

shake things up. It can be argued at this point that we have already seen the manifestation of the first quake,

the subsequent 'wedding postponed' story, and then 3/three other quakes in close proximate to each other.This last would be the group of three quakes that struck near Fiji this week. IF this is the middle part of the

series, then a gap of about 10/ten to 14/days would result and we would theoretically expect to see the

largest of the group of five quakes described within the data set. Now we note that the first earthquake wasa 6.2 and subsequently the largest of the most recent Fiji quakes was a 6.1. Therefore to fit our description,

the next earthquake need only be a 6.3 in magnitude, but it should have the impact of producing 'isolation

through restrictions of movement' and other noted impacts. Additionally, our previous data set had very

strong suggestions that the earthquake which produced 'isolation' would be located 'north of 50/fifty' as in50/fifty degrees of latitude.

*READ THE FOLLOWING VERY CAREFULLY*

The current processing of the data set does have a large Terra based sub set going to earthquakes, and there

is a body of lexical structures which do indicate the West Coast of the USofA as the point of impact of the

earthquake and the timing component does indicate within the last 2/two weeks of June. HOWEVER, wenote that there are planned, and discussed "exercises" in place, and on-going in which a large number of

people are pretending that an earthquake will strike the New Madrid fault of the USofA on June 19th. In

addition, a number of government employees are to pretend that they are 'vital to life here in the USofA',

and will run like rabbits to bunker down in burrows in a 'continuity of government' exercise. THESE andother drills will and do impact our data set. So there is a huge caveat to the interpretation below. Our data

mining cannot tell the difference between a mass delusion, or mass pretending, and the actual events. If thenumbers of people discussing the event is large, and they have a sufficient amount of emotional

investment/energy within the exercise, then this may/will cause them to alter their lexicon and we will pick

that up within our acquisition process as being a valid change set. Does that make sense? Put another way,if one is looking at a large group of people through binoculars from far enough away, it is hard to say if

they are in a panic for real, or just pretending for a film, and the cameras are just outside the visible field ofthe binoculars.

So, given our peculiar binoculars which is modelspace, and given the caveat above, we do find that '5/five'

people who are described as 'liberal minded' will be the focus of the press *after* a large earthquake causes


16/67


17/67

out of the 'rebellion' theme currently manifesting within the populace globally. The 'revolution' meta data

layer does not auger well for this entity as the 'marshy waters conceal hazards'. And we ain't talking golf

here. The data set is going much more toward the idea of 'guillotine, guillotine!'.

Conclusion: Part 1 - Don't Feed the Monkeys

In our work numbers dominate. They stream past as ISO character descriptors for unicode, or pummel us asdata themselves sucked up from the number stew that is the internet. Numbers rule all. Within our

processing numbers are employed as constant slaves attempting to discipline unruly linguistics. We use

numbers with vanity, declaring that the functions of universe shall herd themselves as docile domestics intoour mathematic corrals.

We use numbers. We have also taken the time to read B. Fuller's Synergetics, including chapter 1200.00 on

Numerology. After much skin wrinkling and coffee consumption, we even think we get it.

So we distrust numbers.

Further, we have a rule that numbers can be dangerous. Especially in the hands of some people. Somepeople will use numbers to attempt manipulation. This is a constant theme found on cable "news" shows of

all kinds where numbers are used to scare, intimidate, attempt to awe, or as in the financial areas, actually

used to change behavior. For instance, not a day goes by without some numbers being offered to drivebehavior in purchasing. Numbers are constantly being used to beat people about the head on the assumptionthat a new behavior will result.

Seemingly, for all the energy expended, and effort involved, it does not work. Still that does not prevent

people from trying.

But the real problem with numbers is that for the individual monkey mind, numbers are shiny strange

attractors which captivate beyond all reason. In fact, they captivate to the detriment of reason.

Take the case of the pending large earthquake that is suggested by our data. The observer could easily be

faced with someone running up shouting "10/ten" as though that number has meaning. Seemingly, the

shouter should have some concept of what a "10/ten" earthquake would be like, but when pressed as to why

the huge 'fear rush' they are experiencing, and usually would like you to also experience, they have verylittle understanding of what a '10/ten' in earthquake language would actually manifest on the ground. When

they are invited to step outside of monkey mind for a minute and analyze either their fear state, or the

captivating image which drives it, both will melt under reason. After all, while earthquakes kill, as has been

shown, they do so primarily through bad engineering. True, the recent Pakistan earthquake had a very highdeath toll, and there were many landslides, but the majority of deaths were caused by building failure, not

sliding into ravines. Still, the point is maintained, that even when the earth decides to open up and swallow

people during an earthquake, it is both rare, and affects small groups of people. The vast majority of injuryand death comes from human engineering and construction practices, not the effects of the quake itself.

Having recent experience with a 6.8 earthquake which nearly collapsed the Washington State Capitol

dome, we can say, that as far as destruction is concerned, the number of the magnitude of the earthquake isless than meaningful. In many case people die due to engineering failure in very small magnitude quakes.

So when presented with a foaming at the mouth, emotion engorged human waving numbers, the thing to dois to *not* take them seriously. It does not matter whether it is a government stooge shouting 'be well, the

economy is the best ever, here are numbers' or whether it is the latest prophet shouting 'fear and flee, giant

earthquake coming, god has given me numbers'. In either case the point being pressed is an attempt toenlarge the emotional wave, either positive or negative, with your participation. The smart human says "no

thanks" and keeps their emotional state under their own control.

The smart human recognizes it is unwise to feed the monkeys, and if one must, only to give them peanuts

and never numbers.


18/67

Part 2 of this series is expected to be posted by late on Saturday, June 17th 2006.

Copyright 2006 by HalfpastHuman. All rights reserved.Released through subscription only.

No reproduction in whole or in part without prior permission.

ALTA IR - 1206 -Part 2 - June 17, 2006

Part 2: Meta Data - Shifting Time Maps*

GlobalPop - Obituary for a Buck, LingEx #22*

Markets - Abysmal Supports Natural*

Gold/Commodities - Irrigation of Summer Fields Foams Turbulent Creek *

Populace/USofA - 2/Two per cent Solution*

Conclusion: Part 2 - Burning of Rome, July 18, 64 AD - Six Days, Seven Nights*

Asymmetric Language Trend Analysis Intelligence Report

Changes in language precede changes in behavior.

By Tenax SE for HalfPastHuman.com

Note this report is offered for entertainment value only. Any resemblance between the events portrayed in

this report and any developing reality is purely co-incidental and in no manner represents foreknowledge onthe part of the authors of this report.

Note that this information is derived from humans expressing themselves on the internet. As such, humanemotional values and the words used to express them are being sampled and interpreted here, NOT THE

FUTURE. Any resemblance between this report and future developments is entirely in the mind of the

perceiver and does not exist in reality. The Authors cannot be held liable for accuracy of lack thereof in this

report. Authors cannot be held liable for human interpretation of this report nor any action any human takesas a result of this report. Any human foolish enough to alter their behavior based on this entertainment-only

analysis demonstrates themselves incapable of rational appreciation of reality, and the authors are explicitlyheld harmless and blameless for any and all such mental aberrations on the part of the reader.

06.17.2006

Note: Entities are identified by a blue typeface. Aspect words are enclosed in square brackets []. Attributewords/phrases are within parentheses (). Near sentences or concepts composed of both leading aspect and

trailing attributes are single quoted '. Interpretive editorial comments are preceded by an asterisk *.

Editorial notes are within {} curly braces.


19/67

Data set distilled from 19.97 million reads. Our expectations are to achieve 70+ million reads within our

bandwidth limitations. We expect a 6 part report series from this data set.

Meta Data - Shifting Time Maps

The whole of our effort is dependent on the premise that changes in the "usual and common, daily lexicon"

presay changes in attitude which begets behavioral changes. Note the key word in that sentence is"changes". The whole of our processing effort is devoted to changes. Thus it is to be expected that

processing from week to week will reveal changes within manifesting trend lines. And so it is now. The

chart below reflects the updated processing from this last weeks' immediacy, and short term value sets.Additionally it has the longer term values, sub sets "duration" and "impacts" also processed.

Chart 1

As can be observed when comparing this chart with previous versions, some changes in the timing have

become noticable.The first to receive comment is that our 'peak' of the current emotional building periodhas now been shifted forward on our time scale by this week's immediacy value processing. Instead of

appearing around July 5 or so, we now have the peak of the emotional building period shifted to June 28th.

In addition, the value range is now higher by nearly .001 on our vertical scale. This is denoting a rising

tension trend within the general trend upward. In other words, the most recent processing is finding nearlyall the emotive values to be raised, thus raising the whole of the trend line with little alteration of its general

shape.

The next item to note is that the soon to manifest emotional release period has lengthened on the back end

as well. Not only has it now indicated as starting nearly 8/eight days earlier, it also has extended out toSeptember 8th, an increase of nearly 9/nine days on the back end. Further the depth of the bottom is lower,

and the angles of descent are slightly steeper.

In the same vein, we need note that several of the more singular 'release instances', as shown in safety-

yellow on the chart, have deepened their individual value sets. This is also now true of the

'rebellion/revolution' release points indicated in green. In all cases the values sought lower lows even in therise of emotive sums generally.

As the chart shows, the meta data layer of 'conflict' is still emerging on 08.31.2006, though a slight shift

closer to midnight (UTC) shows up. This move is only about 20/twenty minutes, and is not likely

significant. The emotive sums of the 'conflict' meta data layer, along with the rest of modelspace, isshowing an increase in the value set. This solidification of the emotional trend line for 'conflict' is also seen

appearing in both 'secrets revealed' and 'duality'.

GlobalPop - Obituary for a Buck, LingEx #22


20/67

As the modelspace is progressed past the June Summer Solstice and into July, new lexical elements are

arising which may offer a few details to some of the larger brush descriptors that we had been able to

extract in previous ALTA series. Since ALTA 406 we have been anticipating a couple of 'international

crises' this Summer. As if there is not enough tension and aggression floating about in the world, the dataindicated that these would be completely new international crises, though of course, as with all things

human, they are related to the waves of emotions set forth by past actions. In the most recent immediacy

values, the lexical structures for these crises have grown and provided us with some interesting bits uponwhich to gnaw.

The data set is showing that our 2/two crises will be 'echoes of the past' in that they will be 'staging asthough done/complete long ago'.The parties involved, while certainly including the Bushista entity, are

indicated as being non-USofA centered. That is to say, that the international crises, while involving the

USofA, will begin with 'conflicts/aggressions' or 'release/relief/redress' of 'old wounds/scars' on other

countries collective psyche.

In the case of the first {ed note: we think the first, they may emerge nearly simultaneously} of these crises,

the lexical structure at its center goes to the idea of 'stresses/pressures on government in Belgium'. This set

is very robustly filled out with much redundancy of both aspect and attributes at all levels. In addition, theset is extensively internally cross linked both to its own locality and to the larger GobalPop entity of which

it is a part. The level of cross links suggests a very deep and impacting emotional wave with much residual

ramifications stretching both forward into time, as shown with the extremely high longer-term emotivesums for this entity, as well as out-and-about geographically. The 'stresses on government in Belgium' arerepetitiously supported several layers deep within GlobalPop entity. In each of the supporting

aspect/attribute layers the data set also includes 'resignation', as well as 'dissolution'. As an added bonus, the

second of the 'international crises' will also spin off some of its energy back to this same theme in that it

will also 'return to pressure/stress government in Belgium'. Further, the second appearance of this crisis will

be triggered by 'new actions/behavior' which will somehow involve Italy and its 'invasion' issues.

As supporting layers of the extensive cross links all wrapped up in 'aggression' which is seemingly

'pressurized/compressed' into the 'conflict' meta data layer, the data set provides a number of descriptorswith some additional level of details. As the first crisis is beginning to gain traction on the Press entity,

several interesting cross links appear. A linkage to 'pharaoh' as a concept, and as history emerges. Shortly

after this set is acquired, the data also gains links from Egypt over to Italy, and again, to 'invasion', and then

joins in the supporting layers for 'stressors' within the GlobalPop, sub set 'government', sub set 'Belgium'.

A separate thread that emerges at this point goes to the idea of 'travel bans/restrictions on movement' with a

'China' focus, and supported by 'international agreement'. This area could be interpreted as 'China, through

international agreement, imposes a travel ban on ?', or that 'China lifts/retards travel ban/restrictions onmovement'. While both of these word groups are supported within the data set, given the China to Iran

connection these days, it may be that the second international crisis will involve China voting veto against

sanctions on Iran. A much more probable scenario given current events.

As the modelspace is progressed through the Summer, and as it has past July 15, 2006, the data set begins

to rapidly acquire a number of new values in support of these international crises, including many in the

Bushista entity. Further, the data at that point is also seemingly indicating that a 'global acknowledgement{of} depression in USofA' will emerge, as will some 'printed words, obituary for the USofA dollar'. Again,

given the tightly restricted flow of mainstream media inside the USofA due to corporatism, it may well bethat little coverage of 'dollar death' occurs within the borders of the USofA, and this is rather a more global

phenomena which is why we are discovering it within the GlobalPop entity at this time.

With the release period taking a big step downward on July 15th, the data set gains aspects suggesting that

a new 'Pact of Steel' agreement will 'emerge into awareness'. The emotive values within GlobalPop suggestthat this will be 'propaganda' focused, and will be a driving component of the up wave of the next period of

emotional building shown beginning on September 9, 2006. Much of the wording within this group goes to

the idea of 'propaganda' as well as 'reaction' or 'response'. Of course, this new 'Pact of Steel' will not involve


21/67

Hitler and the King of Italy. Care to guess just who will occupy which role? Hmmm. Linguistic experiment

#22....email us your guess.

Also bound up in 'international crises number deux' are a significant number of threads going to the'catholic church', as well as 'roman catholic' and 'catholicism'. These are all, without exception, within this

area, negatively when the emotional values are summed. The lexical structures also show the formation of

very extensive cross links internally to GlobalPop and back to the emerging wide spread data layer of'religion(s) destroyed/dissolved'. This theme is emerging in several of the entities, and although growing in

both scope and size, it has not yet reached the level of meta data layer. It may yet, we cannot determine that

at this point. However the main theme supporting the appearance of the 'catholic church' within GlobalPopfollowing the movement of the modelspace beyond July 15th goes to the idea of 'cracks, rips/tears fabrics'.

Alternatively, the set also provides imagery of 'history/tales drive split {in the} fabric/pattern {of} old

social order'. This in turn is further linked back to the 'Pact of Steel' as well as much of the newly acquired

values for 'israel/palestine'.

Seemingly not to be left out of all the "fun" of this Summer, a separate thread within GlobalPop shows that

as the international crisis theme goes forward Russia will be off on its own 'journey to the past' as the

'duma' will be 'set as imperial'. This may mean that the Russian Duma will begin to rubber stamp Putin'sdesires as though he is 'emperor/tzar', but it also could be interpreted the other way as 'executive control

presses down on the Russian Duma'. At this point hard to interpret either way, but worth noting that the

longer term value set shows what happens this Summer with the 'structure' of the Russian political systemwill be with the planet for a very long time indeed. The data set indicates that '1/one hundred years of value'is the impact of the changes. The immediacy values of this group also are arguing for a large and lasting

impression as the 'duration' value is over 130/one-hundred-and-thirty times the sum of the immediacy-of-

emotion value. Whatever this change to the 'duma', one of its first impacts is seen at the level of

'geography', and this area is heavily cross linked back to the 'restrictions on travel' and 'duality' meta data

layers.

Markets - Abysmal Supports Natural

Within our modelspace we sometimes are able to catch sight of changes within the entities as they occur.

These happen when there is a significant change within the descriptor set which is used to define the entity.

In running our processing in deterministic mode, we will "force" changes on an entity by altering the

descriptor set, then running the prolog processing in order to see if there is actual data support for aparticular descriptor set. At other times, the data itself is signaling a change by the addition or subtraction

of descriptor phrases to the base of the entity.

We have such a situation now emerging within the Markets entity. This entity is acquiring a very large base

of new descriptors which are deriving from the Economy entity. Our interpretation at the macro level of

this change is that more of 'reality' will be intruding on the fantasy/wishfullness of the Markets entity. This

does not bode well for the Markets entity nor the real paper-trading markets for which it stands proxy.

An alternative way of looking at the changes would be to suggest that there is to be a convergence betweenthe "real economy" and the "markets economy", however there is no support for this within our

modelspace. To the contrary, within modelspace the Economy entity is larger than ever, and is robustly

adding to the overall emotional stew that defines our linguistic simulation. What does appear to besupported is that tendrils of reality based thinking will begin to 'erode' the layers of paper abstractions

which form the base of the Markets entity.

We note that as the modelspace is moved forward through July and August, several of the previously noted

meta data layers begin to occupy larger areas of the dynamic emotional sums of the entity. Most

specifically, and most dramatically, we are finding that 'restricted movement' and its companion


22/67

aspect/attribute set of 'encounter with scarcity' are becoming dominant within the months running up to the

appearance of the 'conflict' meta data layer in September. We need to note that 'conflict' will likely express

itself not as warfare, but rather as layer upon layer of conflict within all parts of the social order. This

would include the political, and both the markets and economic realms within society. The 'restrictedmovement' and 'encounter with scarcity' meta data layers are also showing signs of moving into dominance

within the Populace/USofA entity across these two months of July and August. At one level, the mere

appearance of the 'restricted movement' and 'encounter with scarcity' meta data aspect/attribute setsthemselves are indicative of 'conflict' being expressed.

As the modelspace is moved forward through the Summer, the data suggests that for'financial/paper/currency' markets this will be anything but a usual year. While many of the

'participants/traders' are seen as 'desiring relief, and relaxation {from the} strain', the data indicates that

they will get neither. In the supporting aspect/attribute sets for the rising 'restricted movement' we note that

'heat steams water', and 'steam heat burns' as well as 'hot, energetic pace exhausts {the} young'. Further the

data set goes on to acquire aspect/attribute support such as 'young {are} ignorant of risks/dangers', and'supple stride hobbled, hampered {by} restricted movements'. Again and again we find repeated references

to 'risks/danger' as both aspect and within the supporting attribute sets. The same theme emerges within the

cross links, both internally to Markets entity and within the very extensive cross link set. This is especiallytrue of the cross links over to the Economy entity as well as to the Gold/Commodities entity.

Much of the supporting sets for 'danger' and 'risk' are unusually filled with specific linguistic sets relating to'premature action'. This lexical structure is unusual in that 'risk' or 'danger' are a high emotional sum to anegative value while very usually not containing references to 'action' as 'action' is frequently seen within

our sets as belonging to the groups that 'remove fear' or are 'anti-fear'. This makes sense at the grosser

physical level as within many species, including homo sapiens modernia, 'fear' induces 'paralysis' both of

mind and body. What we have here is the inclusion of language going to the idea that 'premature action'

represents a 'larger danger/risk' than does the 'trapped in the headlights-of-fear paralysis'. Repeatedly, atseveral layers within the supporting aspect/attribute sets we find that 'fearless/disregarding_fear

reaction/beginning' is to become 'stuck/mired' in a very strong 'top wave/rising wave'. NOTE that this is an

emotional wave and does not represent any pricing or other currency related specific movement. INSTEADwhat we have here is the indications that a 'new {emotional} wave/meme' will emerge which is shown as so

strong as to 'overwhelm {the} gathering/massing tide'. Again, just to be repetitious as hell, the data set

contains many references to 'regrets' which are 'associated {with} ignorance {of what is} on horizon', and

'brazen action brings misfortune/ruin'.

There are a number of 'summer summits' which are indicated both at the macro level of Markets entity

movement through modelspace as well as internally to the entity in its aspect/attribute sets acquired over

this most recent processing cycle. Within this latter set we note that 'repentance disappears' {ed note: not agood thing}, and that 'reckless action' appears which sets up its own 'wave/cycle of regrets' to come. In that

sense the 'summer summit' is the 'pinnacle of sorrow' or 'height of despair'. A curious phrase, as we would

usually think of 'despair' and 'down', not 'up/height', but this is specifically showing up within the data set.It may be an artifact of the processing, but nonetheless it is supported within the lexicon for the Markets

entity. Further the 'pinnacle of sorrow' is extensively cross linked internally to the idea of 'ignorant action,

without thought, tension/energy driven'. The 'reckless action' is somehow associated with 'third' or 'partial

piece, mostly a third', or 'third set {of} demons'. This last is curious, but there are some creeping sets ofcharacterizations which are being added to the descriptor set of the Markets entity as was discussed above,

and along with the 'reality based' language we also have a small number of words going to 'fearful images'.These descriptors should be taken as clues to developing emotional states as in 'beset by demons' or 'seeing

demons' within market actions. In both cases the emotional state is one of 'fear' and 'tension'. Again, both of

these also link over to the idea of 'premature action' which is 'driven by {one's} demons/fears'. Make sense?

At the macro or large scale movement level, the Markets entity has acquired a very sharply steepdownward motion past our neutral line midway within modelspace. Further it is acquiring a lexical set of

aspect/attributes within the months of July/August which go to the image of 'abysmal support drowns all'.

Yet another way of interpreting the aspects/attributes would be that 'abysmal support, dollar regularity

improper'. This last aspect/attribute set 'dollar regularity' holds many variants on 'improper' of which a


23/67

number go to 'criminal', while yet others include 'bribery/crime'. It is also worth noting that the 'dollar

regularity' is shown as 'eliciting party/confidence' which ends as there is 'no inkling' of 'proper conduct

{under these} circumstances'. The implication is for a shift in perspective on the 'dollar' which will not do

the currency any good at all. As much of this area is cross linked over to the Press entity, the interpretationis that while much of the 'dollar unhinging' may have occurred prior to late July, early August, it will take

the mainstream media until then to start reporting the 'uncomfortable/tense' facts about the 'dollar, usofa'.

As the modelspace reaches August 31, the data set has moved the aspect/attributes of 'natural

position/location' into a rising state relative to the meta data layer of 'encounter with scarcity'. While still

dominated by the 'restricted movement' meta data layer, this sub set of the Markets entity nonethelessindicates that 'natural position' of the 'material world' will be 'returning'. This 'returning' is supported by the

acquisition of a large number of new values within the shorter term value set. The majority of these values

are pushing the Markets entity into a very much tighter cluster within the modelspace. Igor noted that it

looked like a "jellyfish in a pressure cooker". The description is apt. The usual "looseness" of the entity

seems to disappear as the modelspace is moved forward into the shorter term value sets. The implication ofthe visual impression is of the whole of the modelspace becoming 'pressurized' over the month of August.

This is due to more than merely Markets entity showing rapid transitions around values indicating 'tension'

and 'internal pressures'.

It is interesting that both within the emotional tension values chart, and within the Markets entity, the

months of January 2007 and February 2007 are showing up as 'fulcrum/pivotal' for 'turns'. While our longerrange data set has yet to be processed, we nonetheless are accruing references for both of these months, andassociated with next year. It may be that whatever arrives in the way of "market sentiment" in Summer of

2006 will be with us until the end of February, 2007.

Gold/Commodities - Irrigation of Summer Fields Foams Turbulent Creek

The descriptor set for the Commodities entity which contains the sub sets for 'gold/silver/precious metals',

over the course of the short term values processing {ed note: 3/three weeks to 3/three months inclusive},

shows a rising aspect of 'fertility' which is supported by the curious set of aspect/attributes going to theimage of 'irrigation pipes active attitude'. This in turn is supported by 'wild creek foams {with} potential'.

And in its turn, this is supported by 'channeling wild creek {brings} irrigation {to the} fields'. Note that all

these word groupings individually tie back to the lexicon to the set of 'testing of limits' or 'limitations

probed'.

If we follow the chain of links from the Commodities entity back to the descriptor set within the lexicon we

repeated run into the idea of 'youthful inexperience tests limits'. Or as is also found 'exploration of potential

shifts attitudes'. Again, these are extensively cross linked within the entity back to areas which also go tosimilar sentiments such as 'questioning restrictions frees actions/movement'. Or, 'successful movement

{depends on/achieved by} consistency {with} natural arrangement'. This in turn also appears at the same

lexical summation levels as other aspects which indicate that 'turbulence irritates ThePowersThatBe'. Notethis last is obtained by cross links to ThePowersThatBe entity where we have a termination in

'irritation/aggravation'.

An odd aspect/attribute set which goes to the idea of 'budding starts {on} Winter solstice' appears as the

shorter term values are processed. This 'budding' is supported by 'advantage/growth' and 'consistency {of}new spring growth'. However we again must note that the 'Winter solstice' is not the usual time of

'budding'. Also it must be noted that the whole of the period from August 31 through the end of February of

2007 is dominated by 'conflict' at the meta data layer, and that much of the language for the Commoditiesentity is also dominated by this aspect as well.

Populace/USofA - 2/Two per cent Solution


24/67


25/67

long political action, just slightly under 2/two per cent of the populace was involved. Again, the point to

Igor and other doubters of the interpretation of this linguistic shift to 'revolution' from 'rebellion

high, clif - alta report vol. 11 (2006.06.03 - 2006.07.16) (eng) (pdf) [alta1206all]

Documents