highway program financing july 2011. michigan allocations federal law + state law + michigan policy...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Highway Program Financing
July 2011
![Page 2: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Michigan Allocations
Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment and Allocations
![Page 3: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Federal Perspective
The Federal Highway Program Focuses on
Federal Functional Classification
…NOT jurisdiction
Urbanized/Non-urbanized Areas...NOT cities,
villages, and counties
![Page 4: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Michigan LawMichigan Allocations
Local MDOTEquity Bonus
TEDF-C TEDF-D
TEDF Set Aside
Excluding CMAQ, Enhancements, Earmarks, and Bridge
31.5% of EB to TEDF
15% to Cat. C
16.5% to Cat. D
Rail Crossing Mandate
30%<MDOT<50%
Rail Crossing Funds
![Page 5: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Allocation Process
Assigning Federal Highway Program Apportionments and Allocations to MDOT and Local Programs
![Page 6: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Transportation Management Area Program
FY 2011 - $88.3 million
Equals Federal Suballocation to Areas Over 200K (policy decision)
Suballocated proportionately to MPOs based on population
Local Roads in MPOs of Urbanized Areas Over 200,000
![Page 7: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Transportation Econ. Dev. Fund-Category C
FY 2011 - $9.2 Million
Equity Bonus (Minimum Guarantee) set aside required by state law
Suballocated to counties by fixed statutory percentage
Congestion Relief on Roads in the 5 Urban Counties
![Page 8: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Transportation Econ. Dev. Fund-Category D
FY 2011 - $10.1Million
Equity Bonus (Minimum Guarantee) set aside required by state law
Suballocated to counties by share of rural county primary mileage
System of All-season Roads in the 78 Rural Counties
![Page 9: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Metropolitan Planning
FY 2011 - $10.8 Million
Equals Federal Apportionment (Federal Law)
Suballocated to MPOs by base and population
MPO Process for Urbanized Areas
![Page 10: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
“Fixed” Allocations
TMA Program $88.3
TEDF-C $9.2
TEDF-D $10.1
Metro Planning $10.8
=================
Subtotal $118.4
25% Target $189.1
-Subtotal $118.4
=================
Remaining $70.7
$70.7 million distributed proportionately to remaining programs
Compared to 25 Percent Target
![Page 11: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Small Metropolitan Planning Organization Program
FY 2011 - $21.2 Million
Proportional share of $70.7 million (policy decision)
Suballocated proportionately to MPOs based on population
Local Roads in MPOs of UZAs from 50,000 to 200,000
![Page 12: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Small Urban Program
FY 2011 - $9.2 Million
Proportional share of $70.7million (policy decision)
Granted to Urban Areas by application
Local Roads in Urban Areas 5,000 to 50,000
![Page 13: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Rural STP Program
FY 2011 - $28.0 Million
Proportional share of $70.7 million (policy decision)
Suballocated to counties by FAS formula (area, miles, population)
County Roads Outside Large UZAs
![Page 14: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Safety Programs
FY 2011 - $26.6 Million
Proportional share of $70.7 million (policy decision)
Granted to Local Agencies by application
Local Road Safety, Rail Crossings, and Safe Routes to School
![Page 15: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
“Non-75/25” Programs
Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality
• Total FY 2011 - $78.4 Million
• Allocation determined by project selection process
Transportation Enhancements
• Total FY 2011- $28.6 Million
• Allocation determined by project selection
MDOT and Local Allocations
![Page 16: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
“Non-75/25” Programs
Bridge Funds
• Total FY 2011 -$134.0 Million
• 15% or $20.1 to Local Bridge Program
Earmarks
• Allocation determined by Congress. No Earmarks in FY 2011
Discretionary Funds
• 2011 is the first year in a long time that we had a full discretionary program
MDOT and Local Allocations
![Page 17: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Obligation Authority
Associate apportionments with corresponding obligation authority
Exclude “Non-75/25” Set aside amount of ceilings
associated with “Fixed” Allocations Distribute the remaining ceiling Determine apportionments for other
programs based on authority amount
Allocations by Obligation Authority, NOT Apportionments
75/25 Obligation Authority
Local MDOT
![Page 18: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Local Projects
When a project is submitted by one of the hundreds of local agencies we ask:• Is the project in the S/TIP?
• Does the agency have apportionment?
• Is there local obligation authority?
If all answers are “Yes” we request obligation of funds
![Page 19: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Local Program Rules
Individual counties and MPOs may submit projects using their entire allocation balance if the projects are in the S/STIP
Obligation Authority amounts are available on a “First-come, First serve” basis
Local apportionments/allocations and obligation authority amounts are carried forward from one fiscal year to the next
![Page 20: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Important Reminder
Differences in estimated and actual costs and changes that occur throughout the financial life of a project increase or decrease balances of apportionment / allocations and obligation authority.
![Page 21: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
MDOT Program
MDOT 5 Year Road and Bridge Program• Also STIP and TIP’s
Uses the MDOT Funding “Template”• Repair and Rebuild
• Bridge
• New Roads
• Maintenance
• Etc.
![Page 22: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
MDOT Projects
When a project is submitted by a System Manager we ask:• Is the project in the S/TIP?
• Is it Federal-aid eligible?
• Do we have eligible apportionment?
• Is there MDOT obligation authority?
Depending on the answers, we can obligate federal funds, request “AC authorization, or use State funds
![Page 23: Highway Program Financing July 2011. Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062801/56649e685503460f94b63cee/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)