hilgrad bower

1
142 Theories of Learning is now in its fifth edition. Ernest Hilgard wrote the first two editions, published in 1948 1 and 1956; 2 I came aboard as a coauthor in the third edition (1966) 3 and assumed more responsibility for the book’s contents in its fourth (1975) 4 and fifth (1981) editions. The first edition appeared when learning theory was the dominant orientation of the main movers of psychology, when Clark Hull, Edwin Guth-rie, Wolfgang Kohler, Kenneth Spence, Edward Tolman, and B.F. Skinner were vigorous spokesmen for their view of psychology. In those days, theorizing in psychology was practically synonymous with theorizing about learning and behavior. The first edition of Theories of Learning summarized the conflicting perspectives in such a fair manner that it was immediately adopted by the field as the authoritative textbook. Had citation indices been computed in those days, the text would have been a Citation Classic from its inception. The book’s balanced, authoritative nature was prototypic of the many insightful reviews for which Hilgard became famous professionally and for which he was recognized with the NAS Award for Scientific Reviewing given in 1984 by the National Academy of Sciences. 5 The award was established by Annual Reviews, Inc., and ISI ® . “Successive revisions of the book have followed the developments of the field. New material and chapters were added as theorists developed their positions in response to empirical results and arguments. As the field gradually changed its focus, to less emphasis on animal conditioning studies, new chapters were added on human memory, information processing, computer simulation and mathematical models of learning, and neurophysiology of learning and behavior. Since I participated in those research developments, Hilgard invited me to write chapters on them for the third edition. Although the text could be classified technically as a ‘history’ book, I have tried in the fourth and fifth editions to relate each historical position to still-active issues in recent research. I have been continually surprised at how easy it is, in modern debates, to detect issues that were foreseen and argued about by our forefathers. Besides updating each chapter, new editions also review and integrate recent developments, so that the text continues to have a contemporary flavor in its topics. “Over its 36 years, Theories of Learning has been a highly recommended and used textbook. Solso 6 surveyed American and Canadian graduate psychology departments for their lists of recommended readings for students preparing for their PhD comprehensive or qualifying exams. Theories of Learning was among the few most frequently recommended readings in the 1979 survey. Moreover, it was the only psychology text that had been in this most recommended category throughout all previous, similar surveys of reading lists, conducted in 1971, 1966, 1958, and 1953. Thus, Theories of Learning has stood the test of time in a field that has been characterized by rapid scientific change. Perhaps the text has endured because it has changed with the times, while striving to be authoritative, balanced, and accurate. A sixth edition is currently being planned.” CC/NUMBER 26 JUNE 25, 1984 This Week’s Citation Classic Bower G H & Hilgard E R. Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981. 647 p. [Stanford University, CA] This textbook reviews the major theories and systematic viewpoints regarding the psychology of learning and behavior. Historically significant positions are discussed and evaluated in relation to current research. Additional chapters on recent developments review new findings in conditioning, memory, school learning, neurophysiology, and computer modeling of learning. [The Science Citation Index ® (SCI ® ) and the Social Sciences Citation Index ® (SSCI ® ) indicate that all five editions of this book have been cited in over 655 publications since 1955.] Gordon H. Bower Department of Psychology Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 May 25, 1984 1. Hilgard E R. Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948. 409 p. 2. ............... . Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956. 563 p. 3. Hilgard E R & Bower G H. Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. 661 p. 4 .. ........................ . Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975. 698 p. 5. Garfield E. The 1984 NAS Award for Excellence in Scientific Reviewing: E.R. Hilgard receives sixth award for his work in psychology. Current Contents (24):3-6, 11 June 1984. 6. Solso R. Twenty-five years of recommended readings in psychology. Amer. Psychol. 34:703-5, 1979.

Upload: aderina9032

Post on 21-Jul-2016

7 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

okkkkkkk

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Hilgrad Bower

142

“Theories of Learning is now in its fifthedition. Ernest Hilgard wrote the first twoeditions, published in 19481 and 1956;2 Icame aboard as a coauthor in the thirdedition (1966)3 and assumed moreresponsibility for the book’s contents in itsfourth (1975)4 and fifth (1981) editions. Thefirst edition appeared when learning theorywas the dominant orientation of the mainmovers of psychology, when Clark Hull,Edwin Guth-rie, Wolfgang Kohler, KennethSpence, Edward Tolman, and B.F. Skinnerwere vigorous spokesmen for their view ofpsychology. In those days, theorizing inpsychology was practically synonymous withtheorizing about learning and behavior. Thefirst edition of Theories of Learningsummarized the conflicting perspectives insuch a fair manner that it was immediatelyadopted by the field as the authoritativetextbook. Had citation indices beencomputed in those days, the text would havebeen a Citation Classic from its inception.The book’s balanced, authoritative naturewas prototypic of the many insightful reviewsfor which Hilgard became famousprofessionally and for which he wasrecognized with the NAS Award for Scientific

Reviewing given in 1984 by the NationalAcademy of Sciences.5 The award wasestablished by Annual Reviews, Inc., andISI®.

“Successive revisions of the book havefollowed the developments of the field. Newmaterial and chapters were added astheorists developed their positions inresponse to empirical results and arguments.As the field gradually changed its focus, toless emphasis on animal conditioningstudies, new chapters were added on humanmemory, information processing, computersimulation and mathematical models oflearning, and neurophysiology of learningand behavior. Since I participated in thoseresearch developments, Hilgard invited meto write chapters on them for the thirdedition. Although the text could be classifiedtechnically as a ‘history’ book, I have tried inthe fourth and fifth editions to relate eachhistorical position to still-active issues inrecent research. I have been continuallysurprised at how easy it is, in moderndebates, to detect issues that were foreseenand argued about by our forefathers. Besidesupdating each chapter, new editions alsoreview and integrate recent developments,so that the text continues to have acontemporary flavor in its topics.

“Over its 36 years, Theories of Learning hasbeen a highly recommended and usedtextbook. Solso6 surveyed American andCanadian graduate psychology departmentsfor their lists of recommended readings forstudents preparing for their PhDcomprehensive or qualifying exams.Theories of Learning was among the fewmost frequently recommended readings inthe 1979 survey. Moreover, it was the onlypsychology text that had been in this mostrecommended category throughout allprevious, similar surveys of reading lists,conducted in 1971, 1966, 1958, and 1953.Thus, Theories of Learning has stood the testof time in a field that has been characterizedby rapid scientific change. Perhaps the texthas endured because it has changed with thetimes, while striving to be authoritative,balanced, and accurate. A sixth edition iscurrently being planned.”

CC/NUMBER 26JUNE 25, 1984This Week’s Citation Classic ™

Bower G H & Hilgard E R. Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,1981. 647 p.[Stanford University, CA]

This textbook reviews the major theories andsystematic viewpoints regarding thepsychology of learning and behavior.Historically significant positions arediscussed and evaluated in relation to currentresearch. Additional chapters on recentdevelopments review new findings inconditioning, memory, school learning,neurophysiology, and computer modeling oflearning. [The Science Citation Index® (SCI®)and the Social Sciences Citation Index®

(SSCI®) indicate that all five editions of thisbook have been cited in over 655 publicationssince 1955.]

Gordon H. BowerDepartment of Psychology

Stanford UniversityStanford, CA 94305

May 25, 1984

1. Hilgard E R. Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948. 409 p.2. ............... . Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956. 563 p.3. Hilgard E R & Bower G H. Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. 661 p.4.. ........................ . Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975. 698 p.5. Garfield E. The 1984 NAS Award for Excellence in Scientific Reviewing: E.R. Hilgard receives sixth

award for his work in psychology. Current Contents (24):3-6, 11 June 1984.6. Solso R. Twenty-five years of recommended readings in psychology. Amer. Psychol. 34:703-5, 1979.

hemchand
hemchand